We Keep Coding

C# Dynamically assign a specific default value to all fields of a certain type in new object instances?

I have a class that contains multiple string fields. Whenever an object of this class is instantiated, I'd like those fields to be automatically assigned with the same specific default value (something like "Undefined"). The reason is:
If I have to serialize the object before all fields are populated with real data, I want those fields to display as this default value rather than being null or string.Empty.
String fields may be added/removed from this class as the project progresses. I'd like to not have to touch the constructor every time that occurs.
Is there any way to do this other than explicitly assigning the default value to each of the string fields one by one in the class constructor?

In C# 6.0 and above, you can use Auto-Property Initializer:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/whats-new/csharp-6#auto-property-initializers
Basically:
public string Property { get; set; } = "UNDEFINED";

You would have to use reflection. Something like this
Type type = obj.GetType();
PropertyInfo[] properties = type.GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo property in properties)
{
if (property.PropertyType == typeof(string)) property.setValue(obj, "UNDEFINED");
}

First of all: I don't see how it could be best practice to do what you want.
If you want something like this to show up in your code:
public string Property { get; set; } = "UNDEFINED";
You should probably look into creating custom snippets that simply write exactly that. e.g. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms165394.aspx
If you don't want that, you could use reflection to find all fields (e.g. strings) in the constructor and set them.
C# Reflection - Get field values from a simple class
FieldInfo[] fields = data.GetType().GetFields(BindingFlags.Public |
BindingFlags.NonPublic |
BindingFlags.Instance);
Setting a property by reflection with a string value
Ship ship = new Ship();
string value = "5.5";
PropertyInfo propertyInfo = ship.GetType().GetProperty("Latitude");
propertyInfo.SetValue(ship, Convert.ChangeType(value, propertyInfo.PropertyType), null);

Well, why not have an extension method like
public static class MyClass
{
public static string GetDefault(this str, string defaultVal)
{
return string.IsNullOrEmpty(str) ? defaultVal : str;
}
}
For a type
public class SomeClass
{
public string str = string.Empty;
}
You can call
SomeClass s = new SomeClass();
s.str.GetDefault("UNDEFINED");

You can initialize values to fields directly instead of in the constructor.
private string myStringVariable = "UNDEFINED";
Perhaps you should reconsider the structure of your program though if it permits many fields to be initialized to undefined.

Maybe I am misunderstanding this but why not do word for word what you described in the question in your constructor?
public class Weee
{
public string name { get; set; }
public int order { get; set; }
public string whatever { get; set; }
public Weee()
{
foreach(var p in typeof(Weee).GetProperties().Where(a => a.PropertyType == typeof(string)))
{
p.SetValue(this, "wut");
}
}
}

You can create a property initializer and have a base class use it. Your classes can then inherit from the base and have their properties automatically initialized:
public class PropertyInitializer
{
public void Initialize<T>(object obj, T value)
{
PropertyInfo[] properties = obj.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo property in properties)
{
if (property.PropertyType == typeof(T))
{
property.SetValue(obj, value);
}
}
}
}
public class InitializedBase
{
protected InitializedBase()
{
var initializer = new PropertyInitializer();
//Initialize all strings
initializer.Initialize<string>(this, "Juan");
//Initialize all integers
initializer.Initialize<int>(this, 31);
}
}
//Sample class to illustrate
public class AutoInitializedClass : InitializedBase
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public int Age { get; set; }
public override string ToString()
{
return string.Format("My name is {0} and I am {1} years old", Name, Age);
}
}
Sample usage:
AutoInitializedClass sample = new AutoInitializedClass();
Console.WriteLine(sample);
Console output:
My name is Juan and I am 31 years old
Notice the base class is using the PropertyInitializer class to initialize fields. This is a simplified example. You can expand it as it fits you (it may not work out of the box with all types).
I personally don't recommend this. It's called a constructor for a reason but you asked a question and I provided an answer.

Here is a simple class from which you can inherit that does exactly what you want:
Example usage:
public class MyClass : DefaultedObject<string>
{
public string MyStringField;
protected override string Default => "UNDEFINED";
}
var myClass = new MyClass();
// myClass.MyStringField == "UNDEFINED"
Implementation:
public abstract class DefaultedObject<T>
{
protected DefaultedObject()
{
T defaultValue = Default;
FieldInfo[] fields = GetType().GetFields(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
foreach(FieldInfo field in fields) {
if(field.FieldType == typeof(T)) {
field.SetValue(this, defaultValue);
}
}
}
protected abstract T Default { get; }
}

I appreciate all the feedback to this question. Here's what ended up working. First, for any string attributes in the class that I wanted to receive an automatic default value, I established as a property:
public string attribute1 {get; set;}
public string attribute2 {get; set;}
And so on. Then, in the class constructor, I included the following loop which iterates through each property of type string:
foreach(PropertyInfo property in GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (property.PropertyType == typeof(string))
property.SetValue(this, "UNDEFINED"));
}
This produced the desired outcome for me.

How can I use reflection to change properties with missing setters?

I have two classes with property getters only
public class A
{
public A(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
public string Name { get; }
public string Value { get; set;}
public string Data { get; set;}
}
public class B
{
public B(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
public string Name { get; }
public string Value { get; set;}
}
They are different in shape but share some of the same property names and types.
How can I copy values when they only have getters?
This is a typical scenario when I send an object as a constructor parameter to extract values from in the new object. Then I need to copy values one by one. This can produce lots of code and is hard to maintain.
Can this be made simpler? Is there a way to use reflection to copy objects when the target only has getter properties?

It is possible to create a helper function that copies two objects where the target object only has property getters.
Try this;
public static void CopyItem<U, T>(U source, T target)
{
// Need a way to rename the backing-field name to the property Name ("<A>k__BackingField" => "A")
Func<string, string> renameBackingField = key => new string(key.Skip(1).Take(key.IndexOf('>') - 1).ToArray());
// Get public source properties (change BindingFlags if you need to copy private memebers as well)
var sourceProperties = source.GetType().GetProperties().ToDictionary(item => item.Name);
// Get "missing" property setter's backing field
var targetFields = typeof(T).GetFields(BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.SetField).ToDictionary(item => renameBackingField(item.Name));
// Copy properties where target name matches the source property name
foreach(var sourceProperty in sourceProperties)
{
if (targetFields.ContainsKey(sourceProperty.Key) == false)
continue; // No match. skip
var sourceValue = sourceProperty.Value.GetValue(source);
targetFields[sourceProperty.Key].SetValue(target, sourceValue);
}
}
This is a generic description. You will probably want to check the property and field data types as well before you copy the value to prevent exceptions. Both name and data type should match.
Use CopyItem to copy matching source properties in a constructor;
public class SomeClass
{
public SomeClass(SomeSourceClass source)
{
Helper.CopyItem(source, this);
}
}

Strongly-typed Search functionality for class?

I am trying to figure out something with c# code, and I'm not 100% sure if it is possible, but I am trying to implement search functionality for several classes which is streamlined and overall easy to develop for. Right now I have the following code:
[DataContract(IsReference = true), Serializable]
public class ClassSearch
{
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public object Value { get; set; }
public override string ToString()
{
return String.Format("{0} = {1}", Name, Value);
}
... // additional logic
}
However, I would like to include strong typing for the object value so that it only can be set to the property that is passed in, I guess like similar (hypothetical, not sure if this would work)
[DataContract(IsReference = true), Serializable]
public class ClassSearch<TProperty>
{
[DataMember]
public TProperty Property {get; set; }
public override string ToString()
{
return String.Format("{0} = '{1}'", Property.Name, Property);
}
... // additional logic
}
public class MainClass
{
public void Execute()
{
SomeClass someClass = new Class{
Property = "Value";
};
ClassSearch search = new ClassSearch<SomeClass.Property>{
Property = someClass.Property
};
var retString = search.ToString(); // Returns "Property = 'Value'"
}
}

It seems you are trying to create a WCF service to be able to pass any type you like.
First of all, this is not WSDL-friendly. All WCF services needs to be able to be exposed in WSDL. WSDL is all about well-defined contracts hence the types need be all defined. So that generic approach would not work - mainly because of WSDL. Having said that, you still can use generics but then you have to use KnownType and actually define all the types possible - which for me defeats the object.
Yet, one thing you can do is to serialize the object yourself and pass around with its type name across the wire. On the other side, you can pick it up deserialize.
So something along the line of:
// NOTE: Not meant for production!
[DataContract]
public class GenericWcfPayload
{
[DataMember]
public byte[] Payload {get; set;}
[DataMember]
public string TypeName {get; set;}
}

If there are no easier answers I would try it with this one.
You could use expressions like so:
// Sample object with a property.
SomeClass someClass = new SomeClass{Property = "Value"};
// Create the member expression.
Expression<Func<object /*prop owner object*/, object/*prop value*/>> e =
owner => ((SomeClass)owner).Property;
// Get property name by analyzing expression.
string propName = ((MemberExpression)e.Body).Member.Name;
// Get property value by compiling and running expression.
object propValue = e.Compile().Invoke(someClass);
You hand over your property by the member expression owner => ((SomeClass)owner).Property. This expression contains both information you need: property name and property value. The last two lines show you how to get name and value.
Following a larger example:
class MainClass
{
public static void Execute()
{
SomeClass someClass = new SomeClass{
Property = "Value"
};
var search = new ClassSearch(s => ((SomeClass)s).Property);
Console.Out.WriteLine("{0} = '{1}'", search.Property.Name, search.Property.GetValue(someClass));
}
}
class Reflector
{
public static string GetPropertyName(Expression<Func<object, object>> e)
{
if (e.Body.NodeType != ExpressionType.MemberAccess)
{
throw new ArgumentException("Wrong expression!");
}
MemberExpression me = ((MemberExpression) e.Body);
return me.Member.Name;
}
}
class ClassSearch
{
public ClassSearch(Expression<Func<object, object>> e)
{
Property = new PropertyNameAndValue(e);
}
public PropertyNameAndValue Property { get; private set; }
public override string ToString()
{
return String.Format("{0} = '{1}'", Property.Name, Property);
}
}
class PropertyNameAndValue
{
private readonly Func<object, object> _func;
public PropertyNameAndValue(Expression<Func<object, object>> e)
{
_func = e.Compile();
Name = Reflector.GetPropertyName(e);
}
public object GetValue(object propOwner)
{
return _func.Invoke(propOwner);
}
public string Name { get; private set; }
}
class SomeClass
{
public string Property { get; set; }
}
The main part of that example is the method Reflector.GetPropertyName(...) that returns the name of a property within an expression. I.e. Reflector.GetPropertyName(s => ((SomeClass)s).Property) would return "Property".
The advantage is: This is type-safe because in new ClassSearch(s => s.Property) compiling would end with an error if SomeClass would not have a property 'Property'.
The disadvantage is: This is not type-safe because if you write e.g. new ClassSearch(s => s.Method()) and there would be a method 'Method' then there would be no compile error but a runtime error.

How check whether class members are not null or empty

I have a class with only string members like this :
public class MyClass
{
public string MyProp1 { get; set; }
public string MyProp2 { get; set; }
}
I create an instance :
Var myClass = new MyClass();
Later in the code, I’d like to know if all the member (MyProp1 and MyProp2) are not null or empty. I know I can use a if of course but there is much more properties than 2 in my real code.
Is there a way to do this ?
Thanks,

Using a dictionary based store for your properties is probably the easiest way of doing this:
public class MyClass
{
private IDictionary<String, String> _store;
public MyClass()
{
_store = new Dictionary<String, String>();
}
public string MyProp1 {
get { return GetOrDefault("MyProp1"); }
set { _store["MyProp1"] = value; }
}
public string MyProp2 {
get { return GetOrDefault("MyProp2"); }
set { _store["MyProp2"] = value; }
}
public Boolean HasData()
{
return _store.Any(x => !String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(x.Value));
}
public Boolean IsEmpty()
{
return _store.All(x => String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(x.Value));
}
private String GetOrDefault(String propertyName)
{
if (_store.ContainsKey(propertyName))
{
return _store[propertyName];
}
return String.Empty;
}
}
Another method for doing this would be to compare it with a default instance:
public class MyClass
{
public string MyProp1 { get; set; }
public string MyProp2 { get; set; }
public static readonly MyClass Empty = new MyClass();
public Boolean HasData()
{
return !Empty.Equals(this);
}
public Boolean IsEmpty()
{
return Empty.Equals(this);
}
}

You can try to use the reflect to check the properties. You should need confirm that all the properties are public, and the type is string. Here is the code.
public static bool IsNullOrEmpty(MyClass prop)
{
bool result = true;
PropertyInfo[] ps = prop.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo pi in ps)
{
string value = pi.GetValue(prop, null).ToString();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(value))
{
result = false;
break;
}
}
return result;
}

To check if your class contains 'any' properties which are null:
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo[] properties = myClass.GetType().GetProperties
(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
bool hasNullProperty = properties.Any(y => y.GetValue(x, null) == null);

You can always initialize your class like
public class MyClass
{
public MyClass() {
this.MyProp1 = this.MyProp2 = String.Empty;
}
public string MyProp1 { get; set; }
public string MyProp2 { get; set; }
}
and, unless your programmatically assign a null value to it, the new MyClass() will always have String.Empty in their 2 properties...
from comment:
What I do in those cases is call a helper, for example: string name = myHelper.CheckNode(xmlNode); and in that helper I check if it's null, any other check, I can easily tweek the helper method and it will be available to all elements, and you can extend it to support not only strings but all other data types as well
So, imagine that you are reading nodes from your XML, you write them like:
string name = myHelper.CheckNode(node);
in your helper, you could have something like:
XmlNodeList datasourceNodes = rootNode.SelectNodes("dataSources/dataSource");
foreach (XmlNode datasourceNode in datasourceNodes)
{
DataSource dataSource = new DataSource();
dataSource.Name = myHelper.CheckAttr(datasourceNode.Attributes["name"]);
dataSource.ODBC = myHelper.CheckNode(datasourceNode.SelectSingleNode("odbc"));
// or a variant (Extension Method)
dataSource.UID = datasourceNode.CheckNode("user");
dataSource.PWD = datasourceNode.CheckAttr("password");
ds.Add(dataSource);
}
your helper then could have a method like:
public static string CheckAttr(XmlAttribute attr)
{
return attr == null ? "" : attr.Value.Trim();
}
public static string CheckNode(XmlNode node)
{
return node == null ? "" : node.InnerText.Trim();
}
or for the variant (Extension Method)
public static string CheckAttr(this XmlNode, string attrName)
{
return attrName[attrName] == null ? "" : attrName[attrName].Value.Trim();
}
public static string CheckNode(this XmlNode, string nodeName)
{
return node.SelectSingleNode(nodeName) == null ?
"" :
node.SelectSingleNode(nodeName).InnerText.Trim();
}

If there are many properties in the class, one way of handling this is storing them in a collection, such as an array or a dictionary, instead of declaring each property as a separate member of the class.
Then you can access data in the dictionary by key, which is as easy as accessing a property of a class. And the advantage is that you can loop over the dictionary and check all the properties in a loop.

I would suggest creating a function in your class where you check String.IsNullOrEmpty(MyProp1) etc. for all your properties. This way you at least have gathered all the ckecking functionality in a single place. And you only have this place to modify whenever you add new properties.

To check if all the elements are set you could add a IsEmpty() method to your class that would check the internal properties. Then you wouldn't have to duplicate the if statements everywhere trough your code.
In your IsEmpty() method you can use a regular if statement to check all the fields or you can use reflection to automaticaly retrieve all string properties and check their values. The performance of reflection will be worse then a normal if check but if that's not a problem you can reuse the reflection code in all your entities to check their values.

By using Attribute Base programming you can achieve this. In this approach you will need to place attribute over the class member, and validation is can be done. You can also use Microsoft Enterprise Library for this.

Probably the best way would be to :
Restructure your properties in the form of a Dictionary of strings. Loop through the dictionary to test the strings using string.IsNullOrEmpty(). You could replace the N getter/setters by a single Indexer property which sets and retrieves the strings directly from the dictionary based on a key

You can use try the following style. I haven't tried it before but you might see if it helps
If (String.IsNullOrEmpty(string1 && string2 && string3))

Get collection property of a specific type

I have a class MyDatabaseContext that has a series of DbSet collection properties:
public DbSet<EntityA> EntitiesA { get; set; }
public DbSet<EntityB> EntitiesB { get; set; }
public DbSet<EntityC> EntitiesC { get; set; }
I need to get the name of the collection given the type of the entity.
For example, I have "EntityB" and want to get as a result "EntitiesB".
I really wanted to avoid switch-case statements, since MyDatabaseContext is generated automatically (T4 templates).

if you just want the name of the property here you go. I would just refine the answer given by hunter. You can use the same method with string as return type.
public string GetEntitiName<T>() where T : class
{
PropertyInfo propInfo = typeof(MyDatabaseContext).GetProperties().Where(p => p.PropertyType == typeof(DbSet<T>)).FirstOrDefault();
string propertyName = propInfo.Name; //The string has the property name ..
return propertyName;
}
I tried a sample similar to your situation. Try replacing List with DbSet.
class Program
{
public static void GetEntities<T>() where T : class
{
var info = typeof(TestClass1).GetProperties().Where(p => p.PropertyType == typeof(List<T>));
Console.WriteLine(info.FirstOrDefault().Name);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
GetEntities<int>();
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
public class TestClass1
{
public List<int> IntTest { get; set; }
public List<double> DoubleTest { get; set; }
public List<string> IStringTest { get; set; }
}
This sample works.

I know this is old page, But my answer maybe useful for other guys referring here. (like me)
I think you want to accessing EntitiesB to run a query on it, like EntitiesB.Where(a=>a.bla=="blabla"). If I'm right or another visitor of this page needs something like this, just easily use the following code:
using System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure;
using System.Data.Objects;
((IObjectContextAdapter)_dbContext).ObjectContext.CreateObjectSet<EntityB>()
Description:
_dbContext is Context class inherting from DbContext.
EntitiesB is DbSet<EntityB> defined in Context class.
Example:
Ilist result = ((IObjectContextAdapter)_dbContext).ObjectContext.CreateObjectSet<EntityB>().Where(b=>b.bla=="blabla").ToList();

Your generated file is a partial class, you could create a new file and declare a class with same name using the keyword partial, then make a method which will return the desired Collection...

I haven't actually done this myself, but it sounds like what you want to do is to use reflection to locate the property of type "DbSet" that has the appropriate generic type parameter. The following pseudo-C# should get you started:
foreach ( FieldInfo field in this.GetType() )
{
if ( field.FieldType.IsGenericType )
{
foreach ( Type param in field.FieldType.GetGenericArguments() )
{
if ( param.Name == soughtType )
{
return field.Name;
}
}
}
}