How to call managed c# functions from unmanaged c++
Or use a project of mine that allows C# to create unmanaged exports. Those can be consumed as if they were written in a native language.
I used COM interop first, but by now I switched to IJW (it just works), as it is a lot simpler. I have a wrapper C++/CLR DLL (compile with /clr).
A simple example (using statics to make the calls easier):
namespace MyClasses
{
public class MyClass
{
public static void DoSomething()
{
MessageBox.Show("Hello World");
}
}
}
In the DLL I can reference namespaces as follows:
using namespace MyClasses;
And call it:
__declspec(dllexport) void CallManagedCode()
{
MyClass::DoSomething();
}
Now you have an unmanaged DLL export "CallManagedCode" which calls into the managed code.
Of course, you also have to convert data between the managed/unmanaged boundary. Starting with VS2008, Microsoft includes a marshal-helper for converting between unmanaged and managed types. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb384865.aspx
I used C++/CLI wrapper classes described here and it was relatively easy to implement.
RE: How to call managed C# code from an unmanaged C++ application?
http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/DotNet/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.interop/2005-05/msg00030.html
Calling Managed .NET C# COM Objects from Unmanaged C++ Code ...
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/ManagedCOM.aspx
Wrapping a managed C# DLL in a unmanaged C++ project : dll .
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/.NET/Q_22006727.html
Related
I am attempting to write a DLL using the C# .NET Framework 2.0. Everything compiles okay, but when I try to access the DLL from my application, it fails when attempting to get the procedure address. So, I oped the DLL in Dependency Walker, and all of my public functions are missing!
My DLL, so far, is fairly straightforward:
namespace MyDll_Namespace
{
public class MyDllClass
{
public static int Func1( /* params */ ) { /* ... */ }
public static int Func2( /* params */ ) { /* ... */ }
public static int Func3( /* params */ ) { /* ... */ }
public static int Func4( /* params */ ) { /* ... */ }
}
}
There's not much else, just a few constants and delegates defined inside the class, as well as outside the class in the namespace. Any thoughts or suggestions would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Dependency walker is for win32 DLLs (which is native code), not .NET assemblies (which is managed code). It won't find methods in an arbitrary class (even if they are static). If you need to call managed code from native code, there are ways of doing that, but it's not pretty.
If you want to use your dll from managed code, it's a lot easier. Check out System.Assembly and Activator.
An example of this:
var assembly = Assembly.LoadFile(#"\path\to\your.dll");
var mydllclass_type = assembly.GetType("MyDllClass");
var instance = Activator.CreateInstance(mydllclass_type);
The instance will be an object. To call the methods, you need to use reflection, because the interface is not known at compile-time.
If you are creating a plugin system, the best way is to have a common interface or abstract base for all plugins, and have that referenced by your program. Those third parties who implement a plugin, will also reference this contract. In this case, the last line changes a bit:
var instance = (IMyDllClass)Activator.CreateInstance(mydllclass_type);
Now you can use the methods like in a regularly constructed object.
Part of the problem here is that dependency walker is a tool for native applications. It doesn't understand managed code and hence won't display any of the managed types + methods that you've defined.
I'm confused by this line in your question
when I try to access the DLL from my application, it fails when attempting to get the procedure address
This sounds a bit like an error I would see in a native application, not a managed one. Are you trying to access the C# code from a native application? If so this can only be done via COM magic and not via direct calling. Can you explain in more detail what is going on here?
Try .net Reflector to see exactly what's inside your built DLL (in order to make sure everything is the way it is supposed to).
Also make sure you're in release mode while building your DLL before referencing it... I don't know if it's going to change anything, but it worths the try =)
You need to add a reference to your dll and the runtime will automatically allow you to call your function. Here is a little tutorial on writing a .net class library.
I decided to write my DLLs in C++. However, here is a bunch of useful information I found for using managed code from unmanaged code:
Is it possible to use a DLL created using C# in an unmanaged VC++ application?
How do I call C++/CLI (.NET) DLLs from standard, unmanaged non-.NET applications?
Using managed code in an unmanaged application
Using Managed Components from Unmanaged Code
An Overview of Managed/Unmanaged Code Interoperability
Unmanaged Exports
Calling Managed .NET C# COM Objects from Unmanaged C++ Code
All-In-One Code Framework
CLR Hosting APIs
How To: Migrate to /clr
How to call a managed DLL from native Visual C++ code in Visual Studio.NET or in Visual Studio 2005
I am working on a solution, most of its core engine is developed as Win32 C++ (and is Platform independent and is also used on OS X), some time ago we needed to call C++ dll's of core engine from C# and I was able to Load main solution's DLL in C# (by the help of some threads here on SO). but now we have certain things implemented in Managed C# dll and need to use it in Win32 C++ project? (and just function definitions and dll are provided)
You can create a managed C++ interop DLL to act as a wrapper around the C# library.
Most tutorials on managed C++ unfortunately only explain how to wrap unmanaged C++ for use in C#. But it can work the other way also.
Define an abstract interface class in your native C++ code, then create a concrete subclass inside the managed C++ DLL. Call into your C# objects in the method implementations.
Finally, export a factory function that will instantiate the implementation class and return a base-class pointer that your native code can use.
Here's a quick example:
First, define the class interface in your native DLL.
interopclassbase.h
class InteropClassBase
{
public:
virtual void doStuff() = 0;
virtual int getValue() = 0;
virtual void getString(CString* outStr) = 0;
};
Now you need to create a C++/CLI DLL that will allow you to mix native and managed code in a single assembly. Add a new C++ project to your solution, and in the project configuration set the "Common Language Runtime Support" option to Mixed (/clr).
Once you've added a reference to your C# library (which we'll call ManagedLibrary) we can implement the interop class:
interopclass.cpp
#include "interopclassbase.h"
#include <vcclr.h>
public class InteropClass : public InteropClassBase
{
protected:
gcroot<ManagedLibrary::ManagedObject^> m_managedObject;
public:
InteropClass()
{
m_managedObject = gcnew ManagedLibrary::ManagedObject();
}
virtual void doStuff()
{
m_managedObject->doStuff();
}
virtual int getValue()
{
return m_managedObject->getValue();
}
virtual void getString(CString* pOutStr)
{
System::String^ managedString = m_managedObject->getString();
CString nativeString(managedString); // overloaded CString constructor
if (pOutStr) *pOutStr = nativeString;
}
};
__declspec(dllexport) InteropClassBase* getImplementationPointer()
{
return new InteropClass();
}
Now you just need to load the interop DLL from your native project and call the exported function.
One solution is COM Interop. Possibly the only solution. It a big topic. There's a big fat blue book at work I use. Hundreds of pages of nothing but COM Interop.
The short version is that you label some classes and interfaces in the managed side, and have interop assemblies created which look like COM dlls, but are really proxies to the managed assemblies. The interop assemblies are registered like COM dlls and off you go.
MSDN has a lot of information about it.
This is probably a good starting spot.
"Exposing .NET Framework Components to COM"
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa720072%28VS.71%29.aspx
It can be surprisingly easy, but try to keep it simple.
To create a managed object and call methods on it you need to have the CLR running in your C++ process.
Under windows you can host the CLR by referencing mscoree.dll and hosting the CLR in process.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163567.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms230997.aspx
For Mono, you can embed the Mono runtime within your C++ application.
http://www.mono-project.com/Embedding_Mono
i need to bind C++ dll to my C# WinCE program. (scanner dll)
how i can do it ?
thank's in advance
You need to use Interop to call into unmanaged code.
using System.Runtime.InteropServices; // DllImport
public class Win32 {
[DllImport("User32.Dll")]
public static extern void SetWindowText(int h, String s);
}
Here is an article that discusses the topic in detail (also where the code is sourced from).
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc301501.aspx
An alternative to InterOp is to write a C++ DLL using CLR extensions which acts as a wrapper to the traditional C++ DLL. This gives you a chance to handle unusual types, e.g. custom structures or classes, if Marshaling isn't going to work. (According to MSDN you can extend the Marshaling support (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb531313.aspx) but I haven't tried this personally, and depending on what you're doing it might be a lot of work).
For example if you want to access a DLL which exports a class, you can have a wrapper DLL which owns an instance of the C++ class and defines a .NET class which maps onto the C++ class. For example, here's a snippet from a C++/CLR DLL which we use to make one of our old C++ DLLs available in .NET:
// This is the constructor for the CLR (managed) object
FileInf::FileInf()
{
// Create the C++ (unmanaged) object
m_pFileInf = gcnew DILib::FileInf();
}
// This is a managed interface which replicates the old
// unmanaged functionality
bool FileInf::IsDirectory()
{
return m_pFileInf->IsDirectory();
}
I'd say if InterOp works then stick with it, but I'm not sure if it's the best way to solve every C++ / .NET interfacing problem, and this is an alternative.
I have a C++/CLI project that wraps a native C++ application, which I use in my C# project. I added a few void methods in my C++/CLI class which expose correctly to my C# project. The intellisense shows fine in C# and I can interact with the methods. However, when I put a return type of a struct in C++/CLI, the method doesn't show as availible in C#. Any ideas?
C++/CLI
IPFILTERINFOLIST GetBlockList()
{
return _packetFilter->GetBlockList();
}
...which calls...
C++ Native
IPFILTERINFOLIST PacketFilter::GetBlockList()
{
return m_lstFilters;
}
You should create a "managed version" of the IPFILERTINFO struct and copy your unmanaged data into it. Then you create a normal .NET List<> and add all those managed objects to it.
Suppose I am writing an application in C++ and C#. I want to write the low level parts in C++ and write the high level logic in C#. How can I load a .NET assembly from my C++ program and start calling methods and accessing the properties of my C# classes?
You should really look into C++/CLI. It makes tasks like this nearly trivial.
Otherwise, you'll have to generate COM wrappers around the C# code and have your C++ app call the COM wrappers.
[Guid("123565C4-C5FA-4512-A560-1D47F9FDFA20")]
public interface IConfig
{
[DispId(1)]
string Destination{ get; }
[DispId(2)]
void Unserialize();
[DispId(3)]
void Serialize();
}
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("12AC8095-BD27-4de8-A30B-991940666927")]
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
public sealed class Config : IConfig
{
public Config()
{
}
public string Destination
{
get { return ""; }
}
public void Serialize()
{
}
public void Unserialize()
{
}
}
After that, you need to regasm your assembly. Regasm will add the necessary registry entries to allow your .NET component to be see as a COM Component. After, you can call your .NET Component in C++ in the same way as any other COM component.
I would definitely investigate C++/CLI for this and avoid COM and all the registration hassles that tends to produce.
What is the motivation for using C++? If it is simply style then you might find you can write everything in C++/CLI. If it is performance then calling back and forth between managed C++ and unmanaged code is relatively straight forward. But it is never going to be transparent. You can't pass a managed pointer to unmanaged code first without pinning it so that the garbage collector won't move it, and of course unmanaged code won't know about your managed types. But managed (C++) code can know about your unmanaged types.
One other thing to note is that C++/CLI assemblies that include unmanaged code will be architecture specific. You will need separates builds for x86 and x64 (and IA64).
If you can have both managed and unmanaged code in your process, you can create a C++ class with virtual functions. Implement the class with mixed mode C++/CLI. Inject the implementation to your C++ code, so that the (high-level) implementation can be called from your (low-level) C++ code.
You can wrap the .NET component in a COM component - which is quite easy with the .NET tools - and call it via COM.
If the low level parts in in C++ then typically you call that from the C# code passing in the values that are needed. This should work in the standard way that you're probably accustomed to. You'll need to read up on marshalling for example.
You could look at this blog to get some concrete details.
Create your .NET assembly as normal, but be sure to mark the class with the ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.AutoDual) and be sure an assembly info SetAssemblyAtribute to ComVisible( true ).
Then, create the COM wrapper with REGASM:
regasm mydll.dll /tlb:mydll.tbl /codebase f:_code\ClassLibraryForCom
be sure to use the /codebase directive -- it is necessary if you aren't going to give the assembly a strong name.
rp
Since C# can import C++ standard exports, it might be easier to load up your C++ dll inside of a C# application instead of using COM from C++.
See documentation for System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImport.
Also, here is a complete list of the types of Interop that you can do between managed and unmanaged code:
http://blogs.msdn.com/deeptanshuv/archive/2005/06/26/432870.aspx
In a nutshell:
(a) Using COM-Interop
(b) Using imports/pinvoke (explicit method calls)
(c) IJW and MC++ apps : MC++ & IJW apps can freely call back and forth to each other.
(d) Hosting. This is rare, but the CLR can be hosted by an unmanaged app which means that the runtime invokes a bunch of hosting callbacks.
I found this link to embedding Mono:
http://www.mono-project.com/Embedding_Mono
It provides what seems to be a pretty straightforward interface for interacting with assemblies. This could be an attractive option, especially if you want to be cross-platform