We Keep Coding

Modal Dialog with WPF using MVVM

There are tons and tons of articles around the internet about this topic, but I just can't wrap my head around it. Most articles use code behind, but I want to stick to "pure" MVVM since I try to learn it. Also, I explicitly don't want to use any other framework (MVVMlight, Ninject...). I just want to stick to what WPF has to offer. I know this got asked a lot, but what I found either was not mvvm or was not specific enough.
My task is simple: I want to see the most simple solution of opening a modal dialog, send it a string, and get a string from the dialog back upon closing it.
Therefore I set up my MainWindow.xaml with a text input field (TextBox), a button (that should open the modal dialog) and a textblock that will show the message I intend to receive from the dialog.
The dialog has a TextBlock, showing the user-input from MainWindow.xaml, and a TextBox to enter some text, and a button. You guessed it: you press the button, and the message I typed into the textfield get's returned to MainWindow.xaml. Please refer also to the images I've included - I think it's pretty self-explanatory.
MainWindow.xaml
<Window x:Class="Dialogs.MainWindow"
...
Title="First View (Main Window)" Height="240" Width="630">
<Grid>
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Margin="10">
<TextBlock Text="Main View sayz: "/>
<TextBox Width="360" Margin="10,0,0,30"/>
</StackPanel>
<Button Content="Send to Second View" Command="{Binding SendToSecondViewCommand}" Width="200"/>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Margin="10,30,10,10">
<TextBlock Text="Second View replies: "/>
<TextBlock Width="360"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</Window>
SecondView.xaml
<UserControl x:Class="Dialogs.SecondView"
...
d:DesignHeight="240" d:DesignWidth="630" Background="BlanchedAlmond">
<Grid>
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Margin="10">
<TextBlock Text="This is what First View sayz: "/>
<TextBlock Width="360"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Margin="10">
<TextBlock Text="Second View replies: "/>
<TextBox Width="360" Margin="10,0,0,30"/>
</StackPanel>
<Button Content="Reply to First View" Command="{Binding ReplyToFirstViewCommand}" Width="200"/>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
Here is how I implemented INotifyPropertyChanged (It's actually a .cs file named BaseClasses; I know it's not named properly...)
public abstract class NotifyPropertyChangedBase : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void OnPropertyChanged<T>(ref T variable, T value,
[CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
variable = value;
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
And here my base class for relay commands:
public class CommandDelegateBase : ICommand
{
public delegate void ExecuteDelegate(object parameter);
public delegate bool CanExecuteDelegate(object paramerter);
private ExecuteDelegate execute;
private CanExecuteDelegate canExecute;
public CommandDelegateBase(ExecuteDelegate _execute, CanExecuteDelegate _canExecute = null)
{
execute = _execute;
canExecute = _canExecute;
}
public event EventHandler CanExecuteChanged
{
add { CommandManager.RequerySuggested += value; }
remove { CommandManager.RequerySuggested -= value; }
}
public bool CanExecute(object parameter)
{
return canExecute?.Invoke(parameter) ?? true;
}
public void Execute(object parameter)
{
execute.Invoke(parameter);
}
}
Lastly my ViewModels:
FirstViewModel:
public class FirstViewViewModel: NotifyPropertyChangedBase
{
private string _sendText;
public string SendText
{
get { return _sendText; }
set
{
_sendText = value;
OnPropertyChanged(ref _sendText, value);
}
}
public ICommand SendToSecondViewCommand { get; set; }
public FirstViewViewModel()
{
SendToSecondViewCommand = new CommandDelegateBase(SendExecuteCommand, SendCanExecuteCommand);
}
private bool SendCanExecuteCommand(object paramerter)
{
return true;
}
private void SendExecuteCommand(object parameter)
{
//Do stuff to :
// a) show the second view as modal dialog
// b) submit what I just wrote (SendText)
}
}
SecondViewModel:
public class SecondViewViewModel : NotifyPropertyChangedBase
{
private string _replyText;
public string ReplyText
{
get { return _replyText; }
set
{
_replyText = value;
OnPropertyChanged(ref _replyText, value);
}
}
public ICommand ReplyToFirstViewCommand { get; set; }
public SecondViewViewModel()
{
ReplyToFirstViewCommand = new CommandDelegateBase(ReplyExecuteCommand, ReplyCanExecuteCommand);
}
private bool ReplyCanExecuteCommand(object paramerter)
{
return true;
}
private void ReplyExecuteCommand(object parameter)
{
//Do stuff to :
// a) close the second view
// b) reply what I just wrote (ReplyText) back to First View.
}
}
I have a folder called "Models" in my solution but for the sake of simplicity it's empty.
I know there are solutions with helper classes or services - what ever pertains mvvm will do. I also do know that doing this for such a simple task as what I want is quiet "overkill", and has a lot more writing code coming with it than it would be justifyable for this purpose. But again: I'd like to learn this, and understand what I am doing.
Thank you so much in advance!

I wrote an article about this subject and provided a library and sample application. The article itself is long...because it's not a trivial topic...but causing a dialog box to appear can be as simple as this:
this.Dialogs.Add(new CustomDialogBoxViewModel()); // dialog box appears here
UPDATE: I just noticed that my MvvmDialogs library in that package is actually referencing MvvmLite. That's a vestigial remnant from when I was developing it though, the library itself doesn't need it, so you can remove the reference altogether.

Finding an MVVM pure solution to a programming problem, which may be straightforward in other contexts, is often not a simple task. However, creating a library of helper classes is a "write once, use many times" scenario, so no matter how much code is required, you don't have to reproduce it for every usage.
My preferred method for handling message dialogs in MVVM is a two part service module.
The View registers its data context (its ViewModel) with the DialogService as potentially wanting to display a dialog - the service will use the View's UI context to do so when it does.
The ViewModel calls the injected dialog service each time a dialog should be displayed. Calls to the MessageDialog service are made using the async / await pattern, rather than requiring some other form of callback in the ViewModel.
So now, displaying a MessageDialog from a ViewModel is as simple as
await _dialogService.ShowMessageAsync(this, "Hello from the dialog service.", perDialogIcon.Information, "Mvvm Dialog Service").ConfigureAwait(false);
or
var response = await _dialogService.ShowDialogAsync(this, perDialogButton.YesNo, "Do you want to continue?", perDialogIcon.Question, "Mvvm Dialog Service").ConfigureAwait(false);
I covered this in more detail on a blog post.
As an aside, your ViewModel properties look a bit wierd - you're setting the backing-field value, then passing it into your OnPropertyChanged() method where the value is set again.

C# MVVM: Binding a RadioButton to a boolean Property

I am quiet new to programming and am currently learning C# and the MVVM pattern.
I need to code a database tool for ChiliPlants for university.
There you should be able to add a new object to an ObservableCollection.
To add a new Item to this ObservableCollection a new Window opens. It looks like this:
Window Add
I now want the two RadioBoxes to be bound to a property called "HybridSeed". Which is defined in the ViewModel:
//Public Property HybridSeed
public bool HybridSeed
{
get { return ChiliModel.HybridSeed; }
set
{
if (ChiliModel.HybridSeed == value)
return;
ChiliModel.HybridSeed = value;
OnPropertyChanged("HybridSeed");
}
}
The RadioBox part of my View looks like this:
<RadioButton Grid.Row="5" Content="Ja" Grid.Column="1" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="10,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
<RadioButton Grid.Row="5" Content="Nein" Grid.Column="1" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="89,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
But how to bind the outcome of a user clicking on these RadioButtons to this HybridSeed Property? Important is that the outcome is a bool.
I looked up almost every entry similar to this topic, but I did not find a simple solution. Or a solution which I was able to understand with my bad coding skills :( ...
I would be very happy if you guys could help me. Please keep it simple for this newbie :)
If there is a simpler solution using a CheckBox or a ComboBox it would also be perfect. The most important thing is to have a nice user interface. Right now it only works with a TextBox where the user always has to write "True" or "False".
Solution:
I added the IsClicked Property in the "Yes" RadioButton to be bound to my boulean property with: IsClicked="{Binding HybridSeed}". Thanks to naslund for his fast answer :)

Just bind HybridSeed to the Yes-radiobutton. It will then either be true if the user has selected that or false if No-radiobutton has been selected (or if nothing has been selected). Binding to both buttons in this case is a bit redundant since the mechanism of radiobuttons takes care of it.
WPF:
<RadioButton Content="Yes" IsChecked="{Binding HybridSeed}" />
<RadioButton Content="No" />
<Label Content="{Binding HybridSeed}" ContentStringFormat="Value is: {0}" />
Logic:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new ViewModel();
}
}
public class ViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private bool hybridSeed;
public bool HybridSeed
{
get { return hybridSeed; }
set
{
hybridSeed = value;
OnPropertyChanged(nameof(HybridSeed));
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
[NotifyPropertyChangedInvocator]
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}

opening the appbar in metro style apps using binding property

My main page has the appbar and it is shared across different pages. I wrote the following code to open the appbar on the click of a gridview item.
XAML
<AppBar Opened="AppBar_Opened" IsOpen="{Binding IsAppBarOpen}">
Back end
private void Clock_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
App.ViewModel.SelectedClock = (Clock)ThemeGridView.SelectedItem;
App.WorldViewModel.IsAppBarOpen = true;
}
private void ThemeGridView_ItemClick(object sender, ItemClickEventArgs e)
{
App.ViewModel.SelectedClock = (Clock)ThemeGridView.SelectedItem;
App.WorldViewModel.IsAppBarOpen = true;
}
WorldViewModel
private bool _IsAppBarOpen;
public bool IsAppBarOpen
{
get { return _IsAppBarOpen; }
set { base.SetProperty(ref _IsAppBarOpen, value); }
}
GridView XAML
<GridView
Grid.Row="1"
Grid.Column="1"
x:Name="ThemeGridView"
ItemsSource="{Binding Clocks}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource WorldClockTemplate}"
SelectionChanged="Clock_SelectionChanged"
SelectionMode="None"
IsItemClickEnabled="True"
ItemClick="ThemeGridView_ItemClick"
>
<GridView.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<WrapGrid />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</GridView.ItemsPanel>
</GridView>
But the appbar is not popping up when i select the gridview item. There is no binding error so its really mysterious!

There is not way to bind IsOpen property according the msdn:
Note Binding to the IsOpen property doesn't have the expected results
because the PropertyChanged notification doesn't occur when the
property is set.

<AppBar Opened="AppBar_Opened" IsOpen="{Binding IsAppBarOpen, **Mode=TwoWay**}">

This works for me. I use MVVM Light Toolkit.
public bool AppBarIsOpen
{
get { return this._appBarIsOpen; }
set
{
if (this._appBarIsOpen == value) { return; }
this._appBarIsOpen = value;
this.RaisePropertyChanged("AppBarIsOpen"); // without INotifyPropertyChanged it doesn't work
}
}
<AppBar
IsSticky="True"
IsOpen="{Binding Path=AppBarIsOpen, Mode=TwoWay}">

Roman Weisert's answer correctly states the likely reason for it not working, although you also must make the binding two-way as Zack Weiner suggested (I'm not sure the reason for the latter since the binding is not working in the target-to-source direction anyway). The current value of AppBar.IsOpen may not be reflected by IsAppBarOpen of your view-model. When that's the case, and you try updating the value, it's possible that no PropertyChanged event is raised since you may not actually be updating a value. Instead, you may be just setting the value from false to false or from true to true. Most SetProperty method implementations do not raise the PropertyChanged event unless there is an actual change, and I presume yours is the same.
To fix the problem, consider modifying your view-model as follows:
public bool IsAppBarOpen
{
get { return _IsAppBarOpen; } //changes initiated from UI not reflected
set //not updated from UI
{
_IsAppBarOpen = value;
base.OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
bool _IsAppBarOpen;
The notable difference from your view-model's code, is that SetProperty is not called here so PropertyChanged is raised even when the backing store equals the newly introduced value. In case your base class differs, note that mine has an OnPropertyChanged method with the signature
void OnPropertyChanged( [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null )
that serves to raise the PropertyChanged event.
I can see from your use of the code-behind, though, that you are not really following MVVM. If MVVM is not a concern to you, then you could forgo the IsAppBarOpen property altogether and just directly set AppBar.IsOpen. As someone who religiously adheres to MVVM, however, I do not recommend that you further head in that (sinful) direction.

I had the same issue and using Caliburn Micro for WinRT and with this code worked for me:
<AppBar IsOpen="{Binding AppBarsOpen}" Name="MainAppBar" Padding="10,0,10,0" AutomationProperties.Name="Bottom App Bar">
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="50*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="50*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<StackPanel x:Name="LeftPanel" Orientation="Horizontal" Grid.Column="0" HorizontalAlignment="Left">
<Button Name="ShowFlyout" Style="{StaticResource BookmarksAppBarButtonStyle}" />
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel x:Name="RightPanel" Orientation="Horizontal" Grid.Column="1" HorizontalAlignment="Right">
<Button Style="{StaticResource SaveAppBarButtonStyle}" />
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</AppBar>
And that's your property in ViewModel:
public bool AppBarsOpen
{
get { return _appBarsOpen; }
set
{
if (value.Equals(_appBarsOpen)) return;
_appBarsOpen = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => AppBarsOpen);
}
}

Had the same issue, solved it by adding the Closed event and updating the ViewModel from the code behind. Saw no other way since TwoWay binding was not working as Roman pointed out.
XAML
<AppBar x:Name="BottomAppBar1"
AutomationProperties.Name="Bottom App Bar"
Closed="BottomAppBar1_Closed"
IsOpen="{Binding IsOpen, Mode=TwoWay}"
IsSticky="True">
C# Code behind
private void BottomAppBar1_Closed(object sender, object e)
{
MainViewModel vm = this.DataContext as MainViewModel;
vm.IsOpen = false;
}
C# MainViewModel
public const string IsOpenPropertyName = "IsOpen";
private bool isOpen = false;
/// <summary>
/// Sets and gets the IsOpen property.
/// Changes to that property's value raise the PropertyChanged event.
/// </summary>
public bool IsOpen
{
get
{
return isOpen;
}
set
{
RaisePropertyChanging(IsOpenPropertyName);
isOpen = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(IsOpenPropertyName);
}
}

You should bind both IsOpen and IsSticky two way because otherwise you will get problems with for example having to tap two time to unselect an item (once to close the app bar and once for unselecting) and also it's the will help having your app bar behave more standarly (will prevent the app bar to pop down on tap when an item is selected).
To show the app bar you will need to do the following (the order is important):
this.IsAppBarSticky = true;
this.IsAppBarOpen = true;
and to hide it, do the following:
this.IsAppBarSticky = false;
this.IsAppBarOpen = false;

Another way to make this work without having to use a codebehind handler for app bar closed event:
public class AppBarClosedCommand
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("Command", typeof(ICommand),
typeof(AppBarClosedCommand), new PropertyMetadata(null, CommandPropertyChanged));
public static void SetCommand(DependencyObject attached, ICommand value)
{
attached.SetValue(CommandProperty, value);
}
public static ICommand GetCommand(DependencyObject attached)
{
return (ICommand)attached.GetValue(CommandProperty);
}
private static void CommandPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
// Attach click handler
(d as AppBar).Closed += AppBar_onClose;
}
private static void AppBar_onClose(object sender, object e)
{
// Get GridView
var appBar = (sender as AppBar);
// Get command
ICommand command = GetCommand(appBar);
// Execute command
command.Execute(e);
}
}
then in the XAML you can use it like :
common:AppBarClosedCommand.Command="{Binding AppBarClosedCommand}"
with the command function looking like:
public void OnAppBarClosed()
{
AppBarOpen = false;
}

set SelectedIndex of Combobox in WPF to 0

I am binding a Collection at run time to a Combobox and I would like to set the Index after to 0. I could not find a straight answer to what I want.
_stationNames = new ObservableCollection<string>(_floorUnits.Unit.Select(f => f.Name));
_stationNames.Insert(0, "All");
stationsComboBox.ItemsSource = _stationNames;
stationsComboBox.SelectedIndex = 0;//Doesn;t work
Xaml
<ComboBox x:Name="stationsComboBox" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1" Text="{Binding Name}"
SelectionChanged="StationComboBoxSelectionChanged" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="3"
SelectedIndex="0"/>

It sounds like you're trying to use it like you would with WinForms. WPF is a slightly different beast and a lot more powerful regarding bindings.
I recommend reading a bit on MVVM to get the most benefit from WPF. By binding the XAML to a view model class (rather than trying to wire things up in Code-behind) you will find you can accomplish what you want with a lot more flexibility without oodles of code.
For instance: Given the following VM:
public class MyViewModel: INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public ObservableCollection<string> StationNames
{
get;
private set;
}
public Something()
{
StationNames = new ObservableCollection<string>( new [] {_floorUnits.Unit.Select(f=>f.Name)});
StationNames.Insert(0, "All");
}
private string _selectedStationName = null;
public string SelectedStationName
{
get
{
return _selectedStationName;
}
set
{
_selectedStationName = value;
FirePropertyChanged("SelectedStationName");
}
}
private void FirePropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if ( PropertyChanged != null )
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
You can set your view's (XAML form) DataContext to an instance of the ViewModel and update your combo box definition to:
<ComboBox x:Name="stationsComboBox" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=StationNames}" SelectedItem={Binding Path=SelectedStationName} VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="3"
SelectedIndex="0"/>
From here whenever the combo box selection changes, the VM's SelectedStationName updates to reflect the current selection, and from anywhere in the VM code, setting the VM's SelectedStationName will update the combo's selection. (I.e. implementing a Reset button, etc.)
Normally though, with something like what you've suggested, I would be looking at binding directly to the Units collection. (or VM's derived from units if they themselves can be viewed/edited.) In any case it should give you a bit of a starting point to start researching into WPF bindings.

How to group checkboxes in treeview wpf mvvm when selection range is [0,1]

I have made a tree View in wpf Using MVVM .
it is working fine but here is one problem that leaf node contains some checkboxes and user have only two options either to select one or none .
So here how i can restricted user to select maximum only one cold drink.
I did one trick but it didn't work that when i have already selected a drink and then i select another one than i set the last selected value in the observable collection to false but it doesn't affect on view and selected check boxes remains selected although in collection only one option's value is true.
I cant use radio button instedof checkbox becasue user can select none of the options and i cant give an additional option for none of the above.
If any one have any solution so please let me know I'll be very thankful.
updated question:
i think i didn't define my problem in a proper way so i am giving my code snipperts here hope by this i'll get the solution o f my problem...
My View Model Class
namespace TestViewModels
{
public class ViewModel :ViewModelBase
{
private ObservableCollection<AvailableProducts> _MyTreeViewProperty
public ObservableCollection<AvailableProducts> MyTreeViewProperty
{
get { return _MyTreeViewProperty
set { _MyTreeViewProperty value;
RaisePropertyChanged("MyTreeViewProperty");}
}
}
public class AvailableProducts
{
private string _BrandName;
public string BrandName
{
get { return _BrandName
set { _BrandName = value; }
}
private bool _IsExpanded;
public bool IsExpanded
{
get
{
return _IsExpanded;
}
set
{
_IsExpanded = value;
}
}
private ObservableCollection<ProductTypes> _MyProductTypes
public ObservableCollection<ProductTypes> MyProductTypes
{
get { return _MyProductTypes}
set { _MyProductTypes= value; }
}
}
public class ProductTypes
{
private string _ProductTypeName;
public string ProductTypeName
{
get { return _ProductTypeName;
set { _ProductTypeNamevalue; }
}
private ObservableCollection<ProductSubTypes> _ProdSubTypes;
public ObservableCollection<ProductSubTypes> ProdSubTypes
{
get { return _ProdSubTypes;}
set { _ProdSubTypes;= value; }
}
}
public class ProductSubTypes
{
private string _ProductSubTypeName;
public string ProductSubTypeName
{
get { return _ProductSubTypeName;
set { _ProductSubTypeName;}
}
private int _ParentID;
public int ParentID
{
get { return _ParentID;}
set { _ParentID;= value; }
}
private bool _IsAssigned;
public bool IsAssigned
{
get { return _IsAssigned; }
set
{
_IsAssigned = value;
if _ParentID;!= 0)
{
//updating data in database
//Calling and setting new collection value in property
//issue : updated collection sets in setter of MyTreeViewProperty but before calling getter
// it comes to IsAssigned getter so view doesnt get updated collection of MyTreeViewProperty
}
RaisePropertyChanged("IsAssigned");
}
}
}
}
View
<Page x:Class="ShiftManagerViews.Pages.ProductTreeSelection
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
DataContext="{Binding ProductsTree, Source={StaticResource Locator}}"
mc:Ignorable="d" Width="870" Height="665"
>
<TreeView Margin="10,10,0,13" ItemsSource="{Binding MyTreeViewProperty, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" HorizontalAlignment="Left"
VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="800" Height="Auto" MinHeight="400" MaxHeight="800">
<TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TreeViewItem}">
<Setter Property="IsExpanded" Value="{Binding IsExpanded, Mode=TwoWay}" />
</Style>
</TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
<TreeView.Resources>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:AvailableProducts}"
ItemsSource="{Binding MyProductTypes}">
<WrapPanel>
<Image Width="20" Height="20" Source="/ShiftManagerViews;component/Images/12.bmp"/>
<Label Content="{Binding BrandName}" FontSize="14"/>
</WrapPanel>
</HierarchicalDataTemplate>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:ProductTypes}"
ItemsSource="{Binding ProdSubTypes}">
<WrapPanel>
<Image Width="18" Height="15" Source="/ShiftManagerViews;component/Images/12.bmp"/>
<Label Content="{Binding ProductTypeName}" FontSize="13"/>
</WrapPanel>
</HierarchicalDataTemplate>
<!-- the template for showing the Leaf node's properties-->
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:ProductSubTypes}">
<StackPanel>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding IsAssigned, Mode=TwoWay}" Content="{Binding ProductSubTypeName}" Height="25">
</CheckBox>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</TreeView.Resources>
</TreeView>

What about using a ListBox to display sub-items instead of a TreeView? You can style that so the items contain a CheckBox to show IsSelected instead of highlighting the item.

I'd suggest your user interface is wrong. If the user can only pick one then it would be better to swap these for radio buttons and add a "None of the above" option. That'll then give you the behaviour you want for free and your UI will be more intuitive.
EDIT: Since you say you can't add a "None" option and want to use a checkbox (even though I strongly disagree on checkboxes where a radio button is more appropriate - a common UI error)...
The technical problem you are probably facing is that an ObservableCollection only raises notification events if the collection itself changes. i.e. Only if items are added or removed. It does not raised events when items within the collection change, therefore the changing the status of the checkbox in the code will not raise the event for the UI binding to act on.
One solution to this to write a custom class that extends ObservableCollection that does provide this behaviour
From MSDN:
If you need to know if someone has changed a property of one of the
items within the collection, you'll need to ensure that the items in
the collection implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface, and
you'll need to manually attach property changed event handlers for
those objects. No matter how you change properties of objects within
the collection, the collection's PropertyChanged event will not fire.
As a matter of fact, the ObservableCollection's PropertyChanged event
handler is protected—you can't even react to it unless you inherit
from the class and expose it yourself. You could, of course, handle
the PropertyChanged event for each item within the collection from
your inherited collection

I upvoted Rachel's answer, it is a common way in WPF to databind sets of radio buttons or check boxes. If you still want to go the tree view way, below code works. All view related code is in the view, so below code follows MVVM principles. If you are a MVVM purist you can put the code behind and a TreeView control in a user control if you do not want any code behind.
XAML:
<TreeView ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Drinks}">
<TreeView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<CheckBox Content="{Binding .}" Checked="OnCheckBoxChecked" Unchecked="OnCheckBoxUnchecked" Loaded="OnCheckBoxLoaded" />
</DataTemplate>
</TreeView.ItemTemplate>
</TreeView>
Code behind + VM:
public partial class Window1
{
public Window1()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new VM();
}
private void OnCheckBoxChecked(object sender, System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs e)
{
foreach (CheckBox checkBox in _checkBoxes.Where(cb => cb != sender))
{
checkBox.IsChecked = false;
}
(DataContext as VM).CurrentDrink = (sender as CheckBox).Content.ToString();
}
private void OnCheckBoxUnchecked(object sender, System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs e)
{
(DataContext as VM).CurrentDrink = null;
}
private void OnCheckBoxLoaded(object sender, System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs e)
{
_checkBoxes.Add(sender as CheckBox);
}
private List<CheckBox> _checkBoxes = new List<CheckBox>();
}
public class VM
{
public List<string> Drinks
{
get
{
return new List<string>() { "Coffee", "Tea", "Juice" };
}
}
public string CurrentDrink { get; set; }
}

I did one trick but it didn't work that when i have already selected a
drink and then i select another one than i set the last selected value
in the observable collection to false but it doesn't affect on view
and selected check boxes remains selected although in collection only
one option's value is true.
Make sure that your child objects (AvailableProducts
and SubProductTypes) also implement INotifyPropertyChanged, this will make sure that the UI receives changes when modify the object.
Once all of you objects update the UI properly you will be able to layer in, and test, whatever custom business logic you need.
So if you have a product type that can only have one sub chosen, you could add a property on ProductType called OnlyAllowOneChild. Whenever, a child object raises a IsAssigned changed event, the parent can set false all other children. This of course requires you to have the parent either register for the children's PropertyChangedEvent, or got grab an EventAggregator (MVVMLight Messenger, or PRISM EvenAggregator) and create a messaging system.

Finally i am succeeded to solve my problem.
on Is Assigned property i am updating my database values and calling a method in view using MVVM Light messaging and passing currently selected leaf's parent id in it as a parameter...
Added a property in class Product Types to expand the parent node of the last selected leaf..
In view's method i am refreshing data context's source and passing currently selected leaf's parent id tO the VM to set its Is Expanded property value to true...
By this my view is working perfectly as same as i want...
If any body have solution better than this than I'll be happy to know.