I am quiet new to programming and am currently learning C# and the MVVM pattern.
I need to code a database tool for ChiliPlants for university.
There you should be able to add a new object to an ObservableCollection.
To add a new Item to this ObservableCollection a new Window opens. It looks like this:
Window Add
I now want the two RadioBoxes to be bound to a property called "HybridSeed". Which is defined in the ViewModel:
//Public Property HybridSeed
public bool HybridSeed
{
get { return ChiliModel.HybridSeed; }
set
{
if (ChiliModel.HybridSeed == value)
return;
ChiliModel.HybridSeed = value;
OnPropertyChanged("HybridSeed");
}
}
The RadioBox part of my View looks like this:
<RadioButton Grid.Row="5" Content="Ja" Grid.Column="1" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="10,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
<RadioButton Grid.Row="5" Content="Nein" Grid.Column="1" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="89,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
But how to bind the outcome of a user clicking on these RadioButtons to this HybridSeed Property? Important is that the outcome is a bool.
I looked up almost every entry similar to this topic, but I did not find a simple solution. Or a solution which I was able to understand with my bad coding skills :( ...
I would be very happy if you guys could help me. Please keep it simple for this newbie :)
If there is a simpler solution using a CheckBox or a ComboBox it would also be perfect. The most important thing is to have a nice user interface. Right now it only works with a TextBox where the user always has to write "True" or "False".
Solution:
I added the IsClicked Property in the "Yes" RadioButton to be bound to my boulean property with: IsClicked="{Binding HybridSeed}". Thanks to naslund for his fast answer :)
Just bind HybridSeed to the Yes-radiobutton. It will then either be true if the user has selected that or false if No-radiobutton has been selected (or if nothing has been selected). Binding to both buttons in this case is a bit redundant since the mechanism of radiobuttons takes care of it.
WPF:
<RadioButton Content="Yes" IsChecked="{Binding HybridSeed}" />
<RadioButton Content="No" />
<Label Content="{Binding HybridSeed}" ContentStringFormat="Value is: {0}" />
Logic:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new ViewModel();
}
}
public class ViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private bool hybridSeed;
public bool HybridSeed
{
get { return hybridSeed; }
set
{
hybridSeed = value;
OnPropertyChanged(nameof(HybridSeed));
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
[NotifyPropertyChangedInvocator]
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
Related
This question already has answers here:
Issue with DependencyProperty binding
(3 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I would like to be able to bind complex model (many properties) to UserControl through DependencyProperty, and if model would be edited in UserControl I would like to see this edited information inside my binded model.
Example application: Model, UserControl (xaml + cs), MainWindow (xaml + cs). I have no ViewModel to simplify idea.
Model:
public class MyModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string _surname;
private string _name;
public string Name
{
get => _name;
set
{
_name = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public string Surname
{
get => _surname;
set
{
_surname = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
MyModelEditor.xaml (inside Grid):
<DockPanel>
<TextBox Text="{Binding MyModel.Name}"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding MyModel.Surname}"/>
</DockPanel>
Also contains this line in UserControl root element:
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"
MyModelEditor.xaml.cs:
public partial class MyModelEditor : UserControl
{
public MyModel MyModel
{
get => (MyModel)GetValue(MyModelProperty);
set => SetValue(MyModelProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MyModelProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MyModel", typeof(MyModel), typeof(MyModelEditor), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null));
public MyModelEditor()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
MainWindow.xaml (inside Grid):
<DockPanel>
<Button DockPanel.Dock="Bottom" Content="Press Me!" Click="ButtonBase_OnClick"/>
<controls:MyModelEditor MyModel="{Binding MyModel}"/>
</DockPanel>
MainWindow.xaml.cs:
public partial class MainWindow : Window, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private MyModel _myModel;
public MyModel MyModel
{
get => _myModel;
set
{
_myModel = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
private void ButtonBase_OnClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(MyModel?.Name);
}
}
My test scenario: type text in textbox, press button.
Current behavior: Message after pressing button is empty.
Expected behavior: Message after pressing button is same like in textbox.
I wold not like to bind to all properties separately, because in future I will have much more then two properties.
Why current approach does not work?
How can I achieve my goal?
You are apparently not using the UserControl instance as Binding source in your UserControl's XAML. One way to do this would be to set the Binding's RelativeSource:
<TextBox Text="{Binding MyModel.Name,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=UserControl}}"/>
However, you don't need a new dependency property at all for this purpose. Just bind the UserControl's DataContext to a MyModel instance, like
<controls:MyModelEditor DataContext="{Binding MyModel}"/>
The Bindings in the UserControl's XAML would automatically work with the MyModel object, like this:
<DockPanel>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Name}"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Surname}"/>
</DockPanel>
For both of your TextBox controls, you should define their Binding with a TwoWay mode (ms docs on binding modes). Which, basically, would assure that the data flow is working in both direction (i.e. from the view model into the view and the other way around):
<DockPanel>
<TextBox Text="{Binding MyModel.Name, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding MyModel.Surname, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</DockPanel>
As a good practice, you should always explicitly define what is the mode of the the Binding (NOTE: by default it's OneWay TwoWay - how to know which is the default?).
Another tip would be to go ahead and use MvvmHelpers nuget (github project), which could spare you the time of implementing INotifyPropertyChanged. Besides, you shouldn't re-invent the wheel
EDIT: Fixes are in your GitHub repo
Two things to note here
You have not instantiated your ViewModel (i.e. MyModel), so it was always null
You don't need to create DependencyPropery every time you want to pass some information to your UserControl. You could simply bind the DataContext itself
I'm working on a WPF project and its MVVM. I got a problem about refreshing combobox binding value. So, here its the case, i have a combobox and button on my grid. I need to change datasource then refresh to see new values according to selected one step before.
Please tell me what is the best method to like next button? After that maybe need to like previous button.
public MyScriptForm(IMyScriptModel viewModel) {
this.Model=viewModel;
InitializeComponent();
Height=Double.NaN;
Width=Double.NaN;
}
public IMyScriptModel Model {
get {
return this.DataContext as IMyScriptModel;
}
set {
this.DataContext=value;
}
}
private void btnNext_Click(object sender,
RoutedEventArgs e) {
/// to what ?
Model.cbxAnswer.Clear();
Model.cbxAnswer.add("Step2Data");
}
Create{//its a huge project, this working on when this form created
myScript.Model.cbxAnswer.Add("1");
myScript.Model.cbxAnswer.Add("2");
myScript.Model.cbxAnswer.Add("3");
}
destroy{}
////////////////////////
//Onmy model
public List<string> cbxAnswer {
get {
return m_cbxAnswer;
}
set {
m_cbxAnswer=value;
OnPropertyChanged("cbxAnswer");
}
}
public List<string> m_cbxAnswer=new List<string>();
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName) {
if (PropertyChanged !=null) PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
XAML:
<Grid>
<ComboBox Name="cbxAnswer" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="10,130,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="130" Height="25" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=cbxAnswer}" />
<Button Name="btnNext" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="215,130,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="75" Content="İlerle" Click="btnNext_Click" />
</Grid>
You are just adding and removing from the collection (as opposed to creating a new one). This means that you need a collection that implements INotifyCollectionChanged.
A very convenient class that already does this is ObservableCollection<T>, which I would use instead of List<T> here, and anywhere else you need collection changes to propagate to the UI.
If you are truly doing a full refresh, you may consider just recreating the collection instead of doing add/removes. This could give you a net performance gain, as doing each operation individually must be handled by the UI, as opposed to all at once.
Hy,
I have a menu with a few menu items. I have various other elements like a treeview and some controls. When I open the program all elements in the menu are available. But the first step I have to do is to connect to the server. So all the the other elements shouldn't available till there is made a connection via the connection menu item.
Then I want to show only menu items if a special tree view (for instance the whole item structure) item is choosen for instance all topics. For instance there should be special menu items available if I click a treeview entry in the menu.
Is it possible to accomplish this in xaml?
Update1:
MainWindow.xaml
Title="Service Bus Visualizer" Height="680" Width="1200" Name="Root"
<MenuItem Header="_Read File" Name="readFile" Click="MenuItemReadFile" HorizontalAlignment="Right" Width="187" IsEnabled="{Binding Path=DataContext.IsMonitoring, ElementName=Root}">
<MenuItem.Icon>
<Image Source="Icons/Open.ico" Width="16" Height="16" />
</MenuItem.Icon>
</MenuItem>
MainWindow.xaml.cs
public bool IsMonitoring
{
get
{
return isMonitoring;
}
set
{
isMonitoring = value;
RaisePropertyChanged("IsMonitoring");
}
}
private bool isMonitoring;
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.IsMonitoring = false;
this.DataContext = this;
Application.Current.MainWindow = this;
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void RaisePropertyChanged(string name)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
}
}
ConnectionWindow.xaml.cs
MainWindow mainWindow = Application.Current.MainWindow as MainWindow;
mainWindow.IsMonitoring = true;
I get no error on the output window but it doesn't work?
Update2:
I have a second parameter which is a ObservableCollection.
MainWindow.xaml
<ListBox Grid.Row="3" Name="Logger" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=DataContext.LoggingList, ElementName=Root}" DisplayMemberPath="Message" IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True" ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Visible" SelectionChanged="BringSelectionIntoView">
</ListBox>
MainWindow.xaml.cs
public static ObservableCollection<Log> LoggingList { get; set; }
public MainWindow()
{
LoggingList = new ThreadSafeObservableCollection<Log>();
this.IsMonitoring = false;
this.DataContext = this;
Application.Current.MainWindow = this;
InitializeComponent();
}
Log.cs
public class Log : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public string Message {
get
{
return message;
}
set
{
message = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("Message");
}
}
public string message;
public Log()
{
}
public Log(string message)
{
this.Message = message;
NotifyPropertyChanged("Message");
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void NotifyPropertyChanged(string name)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
}
}
Best regards
First, you have two options as far as "availability" is concerned. The "IsEnabled" property, and the "Visible" property. "IsEnabled" is a bool, and determines if the user can click/select/interact with a given element. Generally speaking, if this property is set to false the element will appear "greyed out".
Changing Visibility will make the element appear/disappear entirely. When set to "Visible" (this is actually an enum), it appears normally. When set to "Hidden", the space for it is reserved on the UI, but you can't actually see it. When set to "Collapsed" you cannot see it and no space is reserved for it in the layout.
For your first requirement (waiting to connect to the server), I would use IsEnabled bound to a "IsConnected" property like so:
IsEnabled="{Binding IsConnected}"
That would go on each item that needs to have this behavior.
The "context-specific" menu items are a bit more complicated, but the basic idea would be a binding on Visible for each of the context sensitive items like:
Visible="{Binding Path=SelectedItem, ElementName=MyTreeView, Converter={StaticResource SelectedItemToVisibilityConverter}, ConverterParameter={x:Type ChildItem}"
I am assuming that each items visibility depends on what type of item is selected (child or parent), you should be able to extend the example if I was wrong. The converter would then look like:
public class SelectedItemToVisibilityConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
if ((parameter as Type).IsInstanceOfType(value))
return Visibility.Visible;
else
return Visibility.Collapsed;
}
public object ConvertBack(...)
{
return Binding.DoNothing;
}
}
Please let me know if I can clarify anything. Hopefully that gives you a good starting point for what you are trying to do.
Update:
Looking at your code I see a couple potential problems:
IsMonitoring is declared as a public field. Binding only works with public properties. This property needs to raise the PropertyChanged event for it to work.
In "MainWindow.xaml.cs" you are setting the DataContext multiple times. This isn't how DataContext works in WPF. You need to set it to one object (your ViewModel) that contains all the properties you are interested in binding to. While it is considered bad practice, you could write this.DataContext = this to get it working before you build a ViewModel class.
The IsMonitoring field is declared in your "MainWindow.xaml.cs" file. First, this should be in a view model. Second, the binding is looking for that property on the MenuItem class (likely because it is in some sort of ItemsControl). If you want it on the root data context, give your window some name (like "Root") and use the following binding:
"{Binding Path=DataContext.IsMonitoring, ElementName=Root}"
Hopefully that makes sense. Let me know if I can help further!
Objective: Set the visibility of a control based on the selected value of a ComboBox
Issue: The property that is being used to check the visibility is in the VM, however I don't know how to use it as DataContext is already defined to another object, i.e would I need to bind 2 datacontexts?!
Details:
I have a CustomControl that I load in my view associating to it a DataContext (a List of objects that is displayed as a grid:
<GUI:Counterparties_UserInputs x:Name="UserInputs" DockPanel.Dock="Right" DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource counterpartiesDataView}}"/>
In that user control I have some StackPanel which visibility should be triggered based on the selection of a ComboBox:
<ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource CounterpartyTypes}}" SelectedValue="{Binding SelectedCounterpartyType}"/>
<StackPanel Visibility="{Binding Path=SelectedCounterpartyType,Converter={StaticResource SelectedValueToVisible}}"/>
The issue I have is that the code behind is never hit as I don't find how to associate an "extra" DataContext to the view.
Here is my code behind:
public partial class Counterparties_UserInputs : UserControl
{
...
public Counterparties_UserInputs()
{
// this.DataContext = _cptyUserInputsVM;
_cptyUserInputsVM = new Counterparties_UserInputs_VM();
InitializeComponent();
}
}
And the ViewModel where the Property "SelectedCounterpartyType" is never hit:
public class Counterparties_UserInputs_VM : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private string _selectedCounterpartyType;
public string SelectedCounterpartyType
{
get
{
return _selectedCounterpartyType;
}
set
{
_selectedCounterpartyType = value;
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs("SelectedCounterpartyType"));
}
}
}
}
I've seen that answer already but it's not exactly what I am doing... So would really appreciate your help! Thank you!
I am binding a Collection at run time to a Combobox and I would like to set the Index after to 0. I could not find a straight answer to what I want.
_stationNames = new ObservableCollection<string>(_floorUnits.Unit.Select(f => f.Name));
_stationNames.Insert(0, "All");
stationsComboBox.ItemsSource = _stationNames;
stationsComboBox.SelectedIndex = 0;//Doesn;t work
Xaml
<ComboBox x:Name="stationsComboBox" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1" Text="{Binding Name}"
SelectionChanged="StationComboBoxSelectionChanged" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="3"
SelectedIndex="0"/>
It sounds like you're trying to use it like you would with WinForms. WPF is a slightly different beast and a lot more powerful regarding bindings.
I recommend reading a bit on MVVM to get the most benefit from WPF. By binding the XAML to a view model class (rather than trying to wire things up in Code-behind) you will find you can accomplish what you want with a lot more flexibility without oodles of code.
For instance: Given the following VM:
public class MyViewModel: INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public ObservableCollection<string> StationNames
{
get;
private set;
}
public Something()
{
StationNames = new ObservableCollection<string>( new [] {_floorUnits.Unit.Select(f=>f.Name)});
StationNames.Insert(0, "All");
}
private string _selectedStationName = null;
public string SelectedStationName
{
get
{
return _selectedStationName;
}
set
{
_selectedStationName = value;
FirePropertyChanged("SelectedStationName");
}
}
private void FirePropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if ( PropertyChanged != null )
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
You can set your view's (XAML form) DataContext to an instance of the ViewModel and update your combo box definition to:
<ComboBox x:Name="stationsComboBox" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=StationNames}" SelectedItem={Binding Path=SelectedStationName} VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="3"
SelectedIndex="0"/>
From here whenever the combo box selection changes, the VM's SelectedStationName updates to reflect the current selection, and from anywhere in the VM code, setting the VM's SelectedStationName will update the combo's selection. (I.e. implementing a Reset button, etc.)
Normally though, with something like what you've suggested, I would be looking at binding directly to the Units collection. (or VM's derived from units if they themselves can be viewed/edited.) In any case it should give you a bit of a starting point to start researching into WPF bindings.