We Keep Coding

How to execute static methods by name

I have an XML file with classes name like this:
<ActiveMonitorsList>
<MonitorName>CertificatesMonitor</MonitorName>
<MonitorName>ServicesMonitor</MonitorName>
<MonitorName>LogsMonitor</MonitorName>
<MonitorName>DBMonitor</MonitorName>
</ActiveMonitorsList>
Each of this classes containts a method: bool SingleCheck();
I would like to execute this bool SingleCheck() method for each class that is in this XML file.
What is the best way to do this?
This is what I have so far - it doesn't work:
foreach (string monitorName in monitorsList)
{
Type thisType = GetType();
MethodInfo singleMonitorMethod = thisType.GetMethod("{monitorName}.SingleCheck");
bool methodResult = singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(...);
}
In place of (...) - don't know what to put here, but I want to get
the result of the method (it's always bool).
All of those methods I want to pass as paramters are static.
I guess delegates, Actions or Func<> have to go in here...
Thank You very much in advance!
Edit: Each name in XML points to a separate class. Each class have the same named method: public static bool SingleCheck().
What I want to do is:
get all the monitors names (classes names will be the same)
invoke a method (it has the same name in each class) inside EVERY
class present on that list.
EDIT - PROBLEM SOLVED:
When I first created my project, I included separate folder for all monitors. Then I changed my mind, deleted this folder and added manually SAME FILES to my solution. In this way - those files still had "using <namespace>.Monitors"...
And that's why I couldn't list those classes and the Types were still nulls...
Thanks for all suggestions ! ;)

I would suggest to take this overload of the method Invoke It wants an object(calling instance) and a set of input parameters for the method from you.
Since it is a static method, you can calmly pass null as the first parameter and because you method does not have any parameters you again can calmly pass null as the second value. Don't forget to cast object to the corresponding return type. In your case bool.
bool methodResult = (bool)singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(null, null);
To get the correct Type you actually need to know the namespace! So this would look like this:
foreach (string monitorName in monitorsList)
{
string typeName = $"{yourNameSpace}.{monitorName}";
Type thisType = Type.GetType(typeName);
MethodInfo singleMonitorMethod = thisType.GetMethod("SingleCheck");
bool methodResult = (bool)singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(null, null);
}
If the loop is in the same namespace this should also work:
Type thisType = Type.GetType($"{GetType().Namespace}.{monitorName}");

thisType.GetMethod("{monitorName}.SingleCheck") won't work because of two reasons. 1) You forgot the string interpolation $-sign and thus are searching for a method called "{monitorName}.SingleCheck" which obviously can't exist with such a name. 2) Instead of thisType you need to provide the type containing the method.
Invoke needs to be called with the instance as first parameter - null for static methods - and an object array for the method parameters.
Assuming that your monitor classes are in the same assembly like your current type you would need to do the following:
foreach (string monitorName in monitorsList)
{
Type monitorType = GetType().Assembly.GetExportedTypes().Single(x => x.Name == monitorName);
MethodInfo singleMonitorMethod = monitorType.GetMethod("SingleCheck");
bool methodResult = (bool)singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(null, Array.Empty<object>());
}
I prefer Array.Empty over new object[0] or new object[] { } because it doesn't create a new object every time.
Edited: Changed the type discovery according to Mong Zhu's comment that GetType(monitorName) does need the fully-qualified name.

System.Reflection.AmbiguousMatchException: 'Ambiguous match found.'

I am trying to get the MethodInfo from a method TableExists<T> so I can call it with a type.
The method is declared inside OrmLiteSchemaApi class. There are 2 overloads:
public static bool TableExists<T>(this IDbConnection dbConn)
{
// code omitted
}
public static bool TableExists(this IDbConnection dbConn, string tableName, string schema = null)
{
// code omitted
}
I am trying to get the MethodInfo like this:
var tableMethod = typeof(OrmLiteSchemaApi).GetMethod("TableExists");
But it generates exception:
System.Reflection.AmbiguousMatchException: 'Ambiguous match found.'
I could only find an old question related to this that suggested to pass an empty object array as parameter but this doesn't seem to work for .net core.
I guess I need to specify the specific overload but I am not sure exactly how.
How do I get the MethodInfo?

You can use GetMethods (plural!) to get an array of all matching methods, and then look for the one which has IsGenericMethod:
var tm = typeof(OrmLiteSchemaApi)
.GetMethods()
.Where(x => x.Name == "TableExists")
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.IsGenericMethod);
I recommend this over using parameter specifiers, since it'll give you an object you can step through at debug time if there are ever any problems.

Passing an empty object array would only work if you're looking for a function with no parameters. Instead, you need to use a different overload of GetMethod that specifies the types of parameters as a type array. That way you can tell it which reference to get by specifying which types of parameters it should look for.

How can I pass delegates to a function for generic delegates?

I have a function to return relevant text from various windows controls.
I was hoping to be able to create something a little more elegant, and less static.
Here's code that functions the way I want it to:
public string returnText(Control controller)
{
string bob = controller.GetType().Name.ToString();
if (bob == "TextBox")
return ((TextBox)controller).Text;
else if (bob == "ComboBox")
return ((ComboBox)controller).SelectedValue.ToString();
else
return "Invalid Object";
}
What I'd like to do is something like this:
Calling code:
TextBoxValue del = x => x.Text;
ComboBoxValue com = x => x.SelectedValue.ToString();
bob.returnText2(this.cboUnitType, com);
bob.returnText2(this.txtCurbAdj, del);
Function:
public string returnText2<T>(T controller, Func<T, string> lambda )
{
return lambda(controller);
}
I'm guessing I'm doing the generic side of things wrong, but I haven't been able to figure out the right way to do it.
Or maybe I'm completely out to lunch here.

Here's a cleaner (and clearer) version of your original code. It doesn't use any reflection, generics or ToString calls. Instead, it uses a pattern matching switch statement:
public static string ReturnText(Control control)
{
switch (control)
{
case TextBox tb:
return tb.Text;
case ComboBox cb:
return cb.SelectedText;
//etc.
default: return string.Empty;
}
}
By the way, your use of the name controller for a variable of type Control is misleading; controller has real meaning in other contexts.
An alternative would be to create a Dictionary<Type, Func<Control, string>> where an entry would look like {typeof(Textbox), c=>((TextBox)c).Text}, but I think that would be a lot less clear than just using a switch like I've shown.
One other thing: You could make this function an extension method on the Control type (by putting it in a static class and putting the keyword this before Control in the parameter list). I'd probably rename it GetTextValue. At that point, you could just say var textValue = anyControl.GetTextValue(); for any control on your page. Unfortunately, there isn't an extension property yet in C#

Using reflection is pretty easy. What you do is use the type of the class to retrieve their properties. Then you request the value of that property on an object and you got the value.
here a quick simple reflection. What it does is get the type of the object, request the property named SelectedValue then query the combobox object to retrieve the value and finally convert as string.
var combobox = this.cboUnitType;
var value = combobox.GetType().GetProperty("SelectedValue").GetValue(combobox ).ToString();
Here the same thing made into a function and quite generic plus has possible error handling
private string GetValue(object obj, string property)
{
var value = "";
try
{
value = obj.GetType().GetProperty(property).GetValue(obj).ToString();
}
catch { }
return value;
}

Get the name of the first argument in an extension method?

string thing = "etc";
thing = thing.GetName();
//now thing == "thing"
Is this even possible?
public static string GetName(this object obj)
{
return ... POOF! //should == "thing"
}

I agree #Reed's answer. However, if you REALLY want to achieve this functionality, you could make this work:
string thing = "etc";
thing = new{thing}.GetName();
The GetName extension method would simply use reflection to grab the name of the first property from the anonymous object.
The only other way would be to use a Lambda Expression, but the code would definitely be much more complicated.

No. At the point you're using it, the "name" would be "obj" - This could be retrieved (with debugging symbols in place) via MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().GetParameters()[0].Name.
However, you can't retrieve the variable name from the calling method.

If you need the original variable name inside an extension method, I think it's best to do this:
thing.DoSomething(nameof(thing));
public static string DoSomething(this object obj, string name) {
// name == "thing"
}

New in C# 6 is nameof() which would replace the extension method entirely.
if (x == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(x));
WriteLine(nameof(person.Address.ZipCode)); // prints "ZipCode”
Somewhat related is the CallerMemberAttribute which will get the name of the method where the function was called. A useful comparison of the two methods, with examples relating to PropertyChanged events, also talks about the IL code generated (TL;DR: they're the same).

Get Method Name Using Lambda Expression

I'm trying to get the name of a method on a type using a lambda expression. I'm using Windows Identity Foundation and need to define access policies with the type name with namespace as a resource and the method name as the action. Here is an example.
This is the type I would be getting the type name and method name from:
namespace My.OrderEntry {
public class Order {
public void AddItem(string itemNumber, int quantity) {}
}
}
This is how I would like to define the access policy through a DSL:
ForResource<Order>().Performing(o => o.AddItem).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());
From that statement, I would like to get "My.OrderEntry.Order" as the resource and "AddItem" as the action. Getting the type name with namespace is no problem, but I don't think I can use a lambda for a method like I'm trying to do.
public static IPermissionExp Performing<T>(
this IActionExp<T> exp,
Func<T, delegate???> action) {} //this is where I don't know what to define
Is this sort of thing even possible to do? Is there another way to do this sort of thing without using magic strings?

There are two ways to do this:
1: You could make overloads that take the various Func and Action delegates(eg Expression<Func<T, Func<TParam1,TParam2, TReturn>>. Note that your callers would need to specify the generic parameters explicitly, either in the method call or by creating the delegate. This would be used like this:
ForResource<Order>().Performing(o => new Action<string>(o.AddItem)).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());
2: You could take an Expression<Action> that contains a method call, and parse out the MethodInfo being called from the expression tree. This would be used like this:
ForResource<Order>().Performing(o => { o.AddItem(null); }).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());

It looks like this is what you are looking for if you want the name of the action delegate method passed in to the Performing function.
public static IPermissionExp Performing<T>(
this IActionExp<T> exp,
Expression<Action<T, string, int>> action)
{
var expression = action.Body as MethodCallExpression;
string actionMethodName = string.Empty;
if (expression != null)
{
actionMethodName = expression.Method.Name;
}
// use actionMethodName ("AddItem" in the case below) here
}
This would allow you to call the method like this...
ForResource<Order>().Performing((o, a, b) => o.AddItem(a, b)).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());

I recently did a thing at work where you defined the a method using a lambda, which the internal object then took the name of. You could use strings as well, or pass in a MethodInfo but the first one isn't really type safe (and typos are a big risk), and the latter is not very elegant.
Basically I had a method like this (this is not the exact method, it is a bit more advanced):
public void SetRequest(Request req, Expression<Func<Service, Func<long, IEnumerable<Stuff>>> methodSelector);
The key here is the "Expression" thing, this lets you "select" a method like this:
SetRequest(req, service => service.SomeMethodTakingLongReturningStuffs);
Method selector is made into a expression tree which you can then fetch different bits of data from. I don't recall exactly what the resulting tree looks like, it also depends on how your lambdas look.

You could pass it in as a Action instead, which doesn't force any return type. It is still a little messy though, because you have to pass some arguments to the method in order for it to compile.