string thing = "etc";
thing = thing.GetName();
//now thing == "thing"
Is this even possible?
public static string GetName(this object obj)
{
return ... POOF! //should == "thing"
}
I agree #Reed's answer. However, if you REALLY want to achieve this functionality, you could make this work:
string thing = "etc";
thing = new{thing}.GetName();
The GetName extension method would simply use reflection to grab the name of the first property from the anonymous object.
The only other way would be to use a Lambda Expression, but the code would definitely be much more complicated.
No. At the point you're using it, the "name" would be "obj" - This could be retrieved (with debugging symbols in place) via MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().GetParameters()[0].Name.
However, you can't retrieve the variable name from the calling method.
If you need the original variable name inside an extension method, I think it's best to do this:
thing.DoSomething(nameof(thing));
public static string DoSomething(this object obj, string name) {
// name == "thing"
}
New in C# 6 is nameof() which would replace the extension method entirely.
if (x == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(x));
WriteLine(nameof(person.Address.ZipCode)); // prints "ZipCode”
Somewhat related is the CallerMemberAttribute which will get the name of the method where the function was called. A useful comparison of the two methods, with examples relating to PropertyChanged events, also talks about the IL code generated (TL;DR: they're the same).
Related
I have an XML file with classes name like this:
<ActiveMonitorsList>
<MonitorName>CertificatesMonitor</MonitorName>
<MonitorName>ServicesMonitor</MonitorName>
<MonitorName>LogsMonitor</MonitorName>
<MonitorName>DBMonitor</MonitorName>
</ActiveMonitorsList>
Each of this classes containts a method: bool SingleCheck();
I would like to execute this bool SingleCheck() method for each class that is in this XML file.
What is the best way to do this?
This is what I have so far - it doesn't work:
foreach (string monitorName in monitorsList)
{
Type thisType = GetType();
MethodInfo singleMonitorMethod = thisType.GetMethod("{monitorName}.SingleCheck");
bool methodResult = singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(...);
}
In place of (...) - don't know what to put here, but I want to get
the result of the method (it's always bool).
All of those methods I want to pass as paramters are static.
I guess delegates, Actions or Func<> have to go in here...
Thank You very much in advance!
Edit: Each name in XML points to a separate class. Each class have the same named method: public static bool SingleCheck().
What I want to do is:
get all the monitors names (classes names will be the same)
invoke a method (it has the same name in each class) inside EVERY
class present on that list.
EDIT - PROBLEM SOLVED:
When I first created my project, I included separate folder for all monitors. Then I changed my mind, deleted this folder and added manually SAME FILES to my solution. In this way - those files still had "using <namespace>.Monitors"...
And that's why I couldn't list those classes and the Types were still nulls...
Thanks for all suggestions ! ;)
I would suggest to take this overload of the method Invoke It wants an object(calling instance) and a set of input parameters for the method from you.
Since it is a static method, you can calmly pass null as the first parameter and because you method does not have any parameters you again can calmly pass null as the second value. Don't forget to cast object to the corresponding return type. In your case bool.
bool methodResult = (bool)singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(null, null);
To get the correct Type you actually need to know the namespace! So this would look like this:
foreach (string monitorName in monitorsList)
{
string typeName = $"{yourNameSpace}.{monitorName}";
Type thisType = Type.GetType(typeName);
MethodInfo singleMonitorMethod = thisType.GetMethod("SingleCheck");
bool methodResult = (bool)singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(null, null);
}
If the loop is in the same namespace this should also work:
Type thisType = Type.GetType($"{GetType().Namespace}.{monitorName}");
thisType.GetMethod("{monitorName}.SingleCheck") won't work because of two reasons. 1) You forgot the string interpolation $-sign and thus are searching for a method called "{monitorName}.SingleCheck" which obviously can't exist with such a name. 2) Instead of thisType you need to provide the type containing the method.
Invoke needs to be called with the instance as first parameter - null for static methods - and an object array for the method parameters.
Assuming that your monitor classes are in the same assembly like your current type you would need to do the following:
foreach (string monitorName in monitorsList)
{
Type monitorType = GetType().Assembly.GetExportedTypes().Single(x => x.Name == monitorName);
MethodInfo singleMonitorMethod = monitorType.GetMethod("SingleCheck");
bool methodResult = (bool)singleMonitorMethod.Invoke(null, Array.Empty<object>());
}
I prefer Array.Empty over new object[0] or new object[] { } because it doesn't create a new object every time.
Edited: Changed the type discovery according to Mong Zhu's comment that GetType(monitorName) does need the fully-qualified name.
I was wondering if there was some existing logic to obtain the name (or any other relevant information) about the definition of a parameter in its containing method/constructor signature by looking at an invocation of that particular method/constructor. Basically, I just want to be able to get a default name for a variable that will be passed as an argument to the invocation. So, if a method if defined as such:
public void Foo(object firstParam, object secondParam, object thirdParam)
I would want to be able to say that the second argument of the following invocation
object bar = null;
this.Foo(null, bar, null)
is expected to have the name "secondParam". Basically, I just want to relate an argument to the original parameter whose "spot" it occupies in the invocation.
I am asking if any util methods that I am not aware of already exist within Roslyn, as there are some more complex scenarios to handle, such as named or optionnal arguments. The solution I've come up with in the meantime should covers some cases, but probably not all (especially params, which should require some more specialized logic to handle). Here's what I have so far:
private IEnumerable<IdentifierNameSyntax> GetParameterNamesFromArgumentList(ArgumentListSyntax argumentList, SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext context)
{
var arguments = argumentList.Arguments;
var parameters = argumentList.Parent.GetSymbolOrDeclaredAs<IMethodSymbol>(context)?.Parameters;
if (parameters != null)
{
var index = 0;
foreach (var parameter in parameters)
{
var argument = index < arguments.Count ? arguments[index] : null;
if (argument != null && argument.NameColon == null)
{
yield return SyntaxFactory.IdentifierName(parameter.Name);
}
else if (argument != null)
{
yield return argument.NameColon.Name;
}
index++;
}
}
}
I could be using DeclaringSyntaxReferenceson the method symbol, but I think that just having the names from the IParameterSymbol suited my needs well enough. Again, if this kind of logic is already implemented anywhere else, I'd rather use it. If not, well, feel free to tell me what you think of the problem.
Sadly I don't think there is a good public way to do this. See Roslyn's internal DetermineParameter helper for something that might help.
I have a method as following:
public void MyMethod(object obj){
// implement
}
And I call it like this:
MyMethod(new { myparam= "waoww"});
So how can I implement MyMethod() to get myparam value?
Edit
I use this:
dynamic d= obj;
string param = d.myparam;
but the error rise :
'object' does not contain a definition for 'myparam'
also I use breakpoint and I see the d have myparam string property.
And is there any way to check dynamic type to if contain any property like this:
if(d.contain(myparam))?
Edit II
This is my main code:
public static MvcHtmlString SecureActionLink(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper,
string linkText, string actionName, string controllerName,
object routeValues, object htmlAttributes) {
string areaName =
(string)htmlHelper.ViewContext.RouteData.DataTokens["area"];
dynamic areaObject = routeValues;
if(areaObject != null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(areaObject.area))
areaName = areaObject.area;
// more
}
and call it as:
<p>#Html.SecureActionLink("Secure Link between Areas", "Index", "Context",
new { area = "Settings" }, null)</p>
And Error is:
Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException: 'object' does not contain a
definition for 'area'
Line 303: dynamic areaObject = routeValues;
Line 304:
Line 305: if(areaObject != null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(areaObject.area))
Line 306: areaName = areaObject.area;
Line 307:
Source File: D:\Projects\MyProject\HtmlHelpers\LinkExtensions.cs Line: 305
Edit III
This is my AssemblyInfo of HtmlHelper definition:
[assembly: AssemblyTitle("MyProject.Presentation")]
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("cpanel.MyProject.dev")]
but there is an error yet: 'object' does not contain a definition for 'area'
I use different assemblies but how can it possible, when I use breakpoint I can see that my dynamic areaobject have area name property and also I can see the value of that, but the error say: 'object' does not contain a definition for 'area' I can't figure it how it can be possible?
Edit
I change the assembly and now dynamic type is internal but the error remains as before
Use this one:
string area = areaObject.GetType().GetProperty("area").GetValue(areaObject, null);
Well, you could use dynamic typing if you're using C# 4:
public void MyMethod(object obj) {
dynamic d = obj;
Console.WriteLine(d.myparam);
}
It does beg the question of why you're not using a named type though. Anonymous types aren't really designed to be shared among different methods like this.
EDIT: Note that if this is in a different assembly to the original code creating the object, you'll need to use [InternalsVisibleTo] as anonymous types are internal.
First off, as others have said: don't do this in the first place. That's not how anonymous types were intended to be used.
Second, if you are bent upon doing it, there are a number of ways to do so. The slow and dangerous way is to use dynamic, as others have said.
The fast and dangerous way is to use "cast by example:
static T CastByExample<T>(object obj, T example)
{
return (T)obj;
}
static void M(object obj)
{
var anon = CastByExample(obj, new { X = 0 });
Console.WriteLine(anon.X); // 123
}
static void N()
{
M(new { X = 123 });
}
is there any way to check dynamic type to if contain any property?
Use Reflection. Of course, if you are going to use Reflection then there is no need to use dynamic in the first place. You use dynamic to avoid using Reflection, so if you are going to be using Reflection anyways, you might as well just keep on using it.
It sounds like you are trying to do something that is hard to do in C#. I would reevaluate whether you want to be doing that, and if you do, whether C# is the language for you. A dynamic language like IronPython might be a better fit for your task.
Everybody says "don't do it in the first place", but this is exactly what asp.mvc does!
(Don't get me wrong I don't like it myself, but if you are writing custom html helpers you want to call them the way you call the normal html helpers...)
And you can use asp.mvc to make your life easier:
public void MyMethod(object obj){
var dic=new System.Web.Routing.RouteValueDictionary(obj);
string param=dic["myparam"] as string;
}
Another way is convert anonymous data to json and then convert to c# json object. You can read all data with this way easily.
I'm trying to get the name of a method on a type using a lambda expression. I'm using Windows Identity Foundation and need to define access policies with the type name with namespace as a resource and the method name as the action. Here is an example.
This is the type I would be getting the type name and method name from:
namespace My.OrderEntry {
public class Order {
public void AddItem(string itemNumber, int quantity) {}
}
}
This is how I would like to define the access policy through a DSL:
ForResource<Order>().Performing(o => o.AddItem).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());
From that statement, I would like to get "My.OrderEntry.Order" as the resource and "AddItem" as the action. Getting the type name with namespace is no problem, but I don't think I can use a lambda for a method like I'm trying to do.
public static IPermissionExp Performing<T>(
this IActionExp<T> exp,
Func<T, delegate???> action) {} //this is where I don't know what to define
Is this sort of thing even possible to do? Is there another way to do this sort of thing without using magic strings?
There are two ways to do this:
1: You could make overloads that take the various Func and Action delegates(eg Expression<Func<T, Func<TParam1,TParam2, TReturn>>. Note that your callers would need to specify the generic parameters explicitly, either in the method call or by creating the delegate. This would be used like this:
ForResource<Order>().Performing(o => new Action<string>(o.AddItem)).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());
2: You could take an Expression<Action> that contains a method call, and parse out the MethodInfo being called from the expression tree. This would be used like this:
ForResource<Order>().Performing(o => { o.AddItem(null); }).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());
It looks like this is what you are looking for if you want the name of the action delegate method passed in to the Performing function.
public static IPermissionExp Performing<T>(
this IActionExp<T> exp,
Expression<Action<T, string, int>> action)
{
var expression = action.Body as MethodCallExpression;
string actionMethodName = string.Empty;
if (expression != null)
{
actionMethodName = expression.Method.Name;
}
// use actionMethodName ("AddItem" in the case below) here
}
This would allow you to call the method like this...
ForResource<Order>().Performing((o, a, b) => o.AddItem(a, b)).AllowUsersHaving(new Claim());
I recently did a thing at work where you defined the a method using a lambda, which the internal object then took the name of. You could use strings as well, or pass in a MethodInfo but the first one isn't really type safe (and typos are a big risk), and the latter is not very elegant.
Basically I had a method like this (this is not the exact method, it is a bit more advanced):
public void SetRequest(Request req, Expression<Func<Service, Func<long, IEnumerable<Stuff>>> methodSelector);
The key here is the "Expression" thing, this lets you "select" a method like this:
SetRequest(req, service => service.SomeMethodTakingLongReturningStuffs);
Method selector is made into a expression tree which you can then fetch different bits of data from. I don't recall exactly what the resulting tree looks like, it also depends on how your lambdas look.
You could pass it in as a Action instead, which doesn't force any return type. It is still a little messy though, because you have to pass some arguments to the method in order for it to compile.
I have a function that wraps a call to one of my socket types. If there is an error, I want to be able to print a warning and retry. In the warning, I want to have the method name. However, it was declared as a lambda. Is this even possible?
How I call the function (assume in function called myMain):
SafeSocketCommand(() => this.mySocket.ReadCurrentBuffer());
Basic wrapping function:
protected TResult SafeSocketCommand<TResult>(Func<TResult> socketCommand)
{
TResult retValue = default(TResult);
try
{
retValue = socketCommand();
}
catch (PacketLost)
{
ReportToLogs("Timeout on command '" + socketCommand.Method.Name);
}
return retValue;
}
But socketCommand.Method.Name gives me the calling method (from the Stack Trace?) '< myMain >b__3' and I want the actual function being invoked by socketCommand (mySocket.ReadCurrentBuffer). Is it possible to get this information anywhere, or is it lost due to declaring in a lambda?
EDIT:
I should have mentioned that I use this particular calling convention so that I can use socket based commands of various signatures.
int i = SafeSocketCommand(() => this.mySocket.FunctionReturnsInt())
bool b = SafeSocketCommand(() => this.mySocket.FunctionReturnsBool(string s))
object o = SafeSocketCommand(() => this.mySocket.Complicated(string s, int i, bool b))
It also handles no return type signatures by overloading:
protected void SafeSocketCommand(Action socketCommand)
{
SafeSocketCommand(() => { socketCommand(); return 0; });
}
If you modify your SafeSocketCommand to accept an Expression<Func<TResult>> then you'll get access to an expression tree that represents the body of the lambda, from which you can access the ReadCurrentBuffer call directly.
However, if you do this, you're no longer dealing with a regular anonymous method; to actually call it you'll need to compile the expression tree to code. You may also need to be flexible as to what your code expects to appear inside the lambda's body.
No, because lambda's don't have names; they're anonymous functions. You could get the method name from the last stackframe, though:
new StackFrame(1).GetMethod().Name;
Func<TResult> is just a delegate. Rather than use a lambda, create a method that matches the signature of Func<TResult> and call that. That way, you'll have whatever name you want.
SafeSocketCommand(MyNewMethod);
...
public TResult MyNewMethod()
{
return this.mySocket.ReadCurrentBuffer();
}
In this case, you can simply this call instead. It'll be faster and smaller generated code too.
SafeSocketCommand(mySocket.ReadCurrentBuffer);
In general, the StackTrace of the Exception object contains the full information you are looking for, much more accurately than printing the method name, or you can use the TargetSite property for the name of the method that threw the exception.