This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What is the difference between ‘protected’ and ‘protected internal’?
I have seen a lot of controversy over the true meaning of declaring a member protected internal.
Under this context is the member's access modifier either "protected or internal" or "protected and internal"?
The documentation is clear that it is "protected or internal".
That is - a member is accessible both within the assembly and any subtype.
protected internal
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the assembly in which it is declared, or from within a derived class in another assembly. Access from another assembly must take place within a class declaration that derives from the class in which the protected internal element is declared, and it must take place through an instance of the derived class type.
Related
This question already has answers here:
In C#, what is the difference between public, private, protected, and having no access modifier?
(19 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I am new to C# programming and I have some questions about access modifier protected and private .
Is it true that when data members and member functions of the class are kept "private" ,they can only be accessed by that class and can't even be accessed by the child (derived) class of that class?
In case of protected, if a data members and member functions of that class are kept protected ,then only the code of that class can access those data members and member functions and also if that class has a derived(child ) class ,then even child class can also access the protected data members and member functions of that base (parent ) class ?
Thank
Protected members are accessible by subclasses, private are accessible only in the class
Well this is going to be a short answer but : yes, this is correct.
Can someone please explain the difference between the protected and protected internal modifiers in C#? It looks like their behavior is identical.
The "protected internal" access modifier is a union of both the "protected" and "internal" modifiers.
From MSDN, Access Modifiers (C# Programming Guide):
protected:
The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or
struct, or in a class that is derived from that class.
internal:
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the same assembly,
but not from another assembly.
protected internal:
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the assembly in
which it is declared, OR from within a derived class in another
assembly. Access from another assembly must take place within a class
declaration that derives from the class in which the protected
internal element is declared, and it must take place through an
instance of the derived class type.
Note that: protected internal means "protected OR internal" (any class in the same assembly, or any derived class - even if it is in a different assembly).
...and for completeness:
private:
The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or
struct.
public:
The type or member can be accessed by any other code in the same
assembly or another assembly that references it.
private protected:
Access is limited to the containing class or types derived from the
containing class within the current assembly.
(Available since C# 7.2)
This table shows the difference. protected internal is the same as protected, except it also allows access from other classes in the same assembly.
protected can be used by any subclasses from any assembly.
protected internal is everything that protected is, plus also anything in the same assembly can access it.
Importantly, it doesn't mean "subclasses in the same assembly" - it is the union of the two, not the intersection.
In practice, about methods:
protected - accessible for inherited classes, otherwise private.
internal - public only for classes inside the assembly, otherwise private.
protected internal - means protected or internal - methods become accessible for inherited classes and for any classes inside the assembly.
There is still a lot of confusion in understanding the scope of "protected internal" accessors, though most have the definition defined correctly. This helped me to understand the confusion between "protected" and "protected internal":
public is really public inside and outside the assembly (public internal / public external)
protected is really protected inside and outside the assembly (protected internal / protected external) (not allowed on top level classes)
private is really private inside and outside the assembly (private internal / private external) (not allowed on top level classes)
internal is really public inside the assembly but excluded outside the assembly like private (public internal / excluded external)
protected internal is really public inside the assembly but protected outside the assembly (public internal / protected external)
(not allowed on top level classes)
As you can see protected internal is a very strange beast. Not intuitive.
That now begs the question why didn't Microsoft create a (protected internal / excluded external), or I guess some kind of "private protected" or "internal protected"? lol. Seems incomplete?
Added to the confusion is the fact you can nest public or protected internal nested members inside protected, internal, or private types. Why would you access a nested "protected internal" inside an internal class that excludes outside assembly access?
Microsoft says such nested types are limited by their parent type scope, but that's not what the compiler says. You can compiled protected internals inside internal classes which should limit scope to just the assembly.
To me this feels like incomplete design. They should have simplified scope of all types to a system that clearly consider inheritance but also security and hierarchy of nested types. This would have made the sharing of objects extremely intuitive and granular rather than discovering accessibility of types and members based on an incomplete scoping system.
protected: the variable or method will be available only to child classes (in any assembly)
protected internal: available to child classes in any assembly and to all the classes within the same assembly
I have read out very clear definitions for these terms.
Protected : Access is limited to within the class definition and any class that inherits from the class. The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or struct or in a class that is derived from that class.
Internal : Access is limited to exclusively to classes defined within the current project assembly. The type or member can be accessed only by code in same class.
Protected-Internal : Access is limited to current assembly or types derived from containing class.
Think about protected internal as applying two access modifier (protected, and internal) on the same field, property or method.
In the real world, imagine we are issuing privilege for people to visit museum:
Everyone inside the city are allowed to visit museum (internal).
Everyone outside of the city that their parents live here are allowed to visit museum (protected).
And we can put them together in these way:
Everyone inside the city (internal) and everyone outside of city that their parents live here (protected) are allowed to visit the museum (protected internal).
Programming world:
internal: The field is available everywhere in the assembly (project). It is like saying it is public in its project scope (but can not being accessed outside of project scope even by those classes outside of assembly which inherit from that class). Every instance of that type can see it in that assembly (project scope).
protected: simply means that all derived classes can see it (inside or outside of assembly). For example derived classes can see the field or method inside its methods and constructors using: base.NameOfProtectedInternal.
So, putting these two access modifier together (protected internal), you have something that can being public inside the project, and can be seen by those which have inherited from that class inside their scope.
They can be written in the internal protected, and does not change the meaning, but it is convenient to write it protected internal.
Protected Member
Protected Member of a class in only available in the contained class (in which it has been declared) and in the derived class within the assembly and also outside the assembly.
Means if a class that resides outside the assembly can use the protected member of the other assembly by inherited that class only.
We can exposed the Protected member outside the assembly by inherited that class and use it in the derived class only.
Note: Protected members are not accessible using the object in the derived class.
Internal Member
Internal Member of a class is available or access within the assembly either creating object or in a derived class or you can say it is accessible across all the classes within the assembly.
Note: Internal members not accessible outside the assembly either using object creating or in a derived class.
Protected Internal
Protected Internal access modifier is combination Protected or Internal.
Protected Internal Member can be available within the entire assembly in which it declared either creating object or by inherited that class. And can be accessible outside the assembly in a derived class only.
Note: Protected Internal member works as Internal within the same assembly and works as Protected for outside the assembly.
public - The members (Functions & Variables) declared as public can be accessed from anywhere.
private - Private members cannot be accessed from outside the class. This is the default access specifier for a member, i.e if you do not specify an access specifier for a member (variable or function), it will be considered as private. Therefore, string PhoneNumber; is equivalent to private string PhoneNumber.
protected - Protected members can be accessed only from the child classes.
internal - It can be accessed only within the same assembly.
protected internal - It can be accessed within the same assembly as well as in derived class.
Protected internal best suites when you want a member or type to be used in a derived class from another assembly at the same time just want to consume the member or type in the parent assembly without deriving from the class where it is declared.
Also if you want only to use a member or type with out deriving from another class, in the same assembly you can use internal only.
This description might be helpful
Internal Member
Internal Member of a class is available or access within the assembly either creating object or in a derived class or you can say it is accessible across all the classes within the assembly.
Protected Member
Protected Member of a class in only available in the contained class (in which it has been declared) and in the derived class within the assembly and also outside the assembly.
Protected Internal
Protected Internal access modifier is combination Protected or Internal.
Protected Internal Member can be available within the entire assembly in which it declared either creating object or by inherited that class. And can be accessible outside the assembly in a derived class only.
As We know
Default Modifier of
Class
Struct
Delegate
Interface
Enum
is Internal.
Enum & Interface members by default are public.
And Class, Struct , Delegate members by default are private.
Non-derived class of same class-library can have access to public and internal class
(and public, internal, protected internal-members).
Non-derived class of different class-library can have access to public class
(public members only).
Derived class of different class-library can have access to public class
(public, protected, protected-internal members).
Now I want to understand the core concept that why is so that...
Protected members are having more scope than internal?
From the docs:
protected
The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or
struct, or in a class that is derived from that class.
internal
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the same assembly,
but not from another assembly.
protected internal
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the assembly in
which it is declared, or from within a derived class in another
assembly. Access from another assembly must take place within a class
declaration that derives from the class in which the protected
internal element is declared, and it must take place through an
instance of the derived class type.
4) Non-derived class of different class-library can have access to public class (public, protected, protected-internal members).
This is not correct.
4) Non-derived class of different class-library can have access to public class (public members only).
And that means that the actual question is also debatable:
why is so that... Protected members are having more scope than internal?
protected and internal have different scopes. Which one is 'larger' is difficult to say. Comparing them in this way is simply not useful.
Protected simply means, that this member or method can not be overridden in a derieving class. Otherwise they behave like public members/methods.
Internal members are not declare for export, so thats why they can not been seen out side the module, the dll of them.
why is so that ... Protected members are having more scope than internal?
Because you can have a protected member accessible across assemblies but that's not true with internal.
internal Internal members are accessible only within files in the same assembly. its scope is limited to assembly only.
protected can be accessible outside assembly. A protected member is accessible from within the class in which it is declared, and from within any class derived from the class that declared this member. This derived class can be outside assembly.
hence it has more scope than internal modifier.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What are the Default Access Modifiers in C#?
When I define a class in C#, and don't specify any access modifier which one is the default? Is it public or protected?
In C# if the type is not nested (within other class or struct) and doesn't have access modifier applied it is internal. If it is nested - private.
From C# specification:
3.5.1 Declared accessibility
...
• Types declared in compilation units
or namespaces can have public or
internal declared accessibility and
default to internal declared
accessibility.
• Class members can
have any of the five kinds of declared
accessibility and default to private
declared accessibility. (Note that a
type declared as a member of a class
can have any of the five kinds of
declared accessibility, whereas a type
declared as a member of a namespace
can have only public or internal
declared accessibility.)
It is [internal]
Can someone please explain the difference between the protected and protected internal modifiers in C#? It looks like their behavior is identical.
The "protected internal" access modifier is a union of both the "protected" and "internal" modifiers.
From MSDN, Access Modifiers (C# Programming Guide):
protected:
The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or
struct, or in a class that is derived from that class.
internal:
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the same assembly,
but not from another assembly.
protected internal:
The type or member can be accessed by any code in the assembly in
which it is declared, OR from within a derived class in another
assembly. Access from another assembly must take place within a class
declaration that derives from the class in which the protected
internal element is declared, and it must take place through an
instance of the derived class type.
Note that: protected internal means "protected OR internal" (any class in the same assembly, or any derived class - even if it is in a different assembly).
...and for completeness:
private:
The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or
struct.
public:
The type or member can be accessed by any other code in the same
assembly or another assembly that references it.
private protected:
Access is limited to the containing class or types derived from the
containing class within the current assembly.
(Available since C# 7.2)
This table shows the difference. protected internal is the same as protected, except it also allows access from other classes in the same assembly.
protected can be used by any subclasses from any assembly.
protected internal is everything that protected is, plus also anything in the same assembly can access it.
Importantly, it doesn't mean "subclasses in the same assembly" - it is the union of the two, not the intersection.
In practice, about methods:
protected - accessible for inherited classes, otherwise private.
internal - public only for classes inside the assembly, otherwise private.
protected internal - means protected or internal - methods become accessible for inherited classes and for any classes inside the assembly.
There is still a lot of confusion in understanding the scope of "protected internal" accessors, though most have the definition defined correctly. This helped me to understand the confusion between "protected" and "protected internal":
public is really public inside and outside the assembly (public internal / public external)
protected is really protected inside and outside the assembly (protected internal / protected external) (not allowed on top level classes)
private is really private inside and outside the assembly (private internal / private external) (not allowed on top level classes)
internal is really public inside the assembly but excluded outside the assembly like private (public internal / excluded external)
protected internal is really public inside the assembly but protected outside the assembly (public internal / protected external)
(not allowed on top level classes)
As you can see protected internal is a very strange beast. Not intuitive.
That now begs the question why didn't Microsoft create a (protected internal / excluded external), or I guess some kind of "private protected" or "internal protected"? lol. Seems incomplete?
Added to the confusion is the fact you can nest public or protected internal nested members inside protected, internal, or private types. Why would you access a nested "protected internal" inside an internal class that excludes outside assembly access?
Microsoft says such nested types are limited by their parent type scope, but that's not what the compiler says. You can compiled protected internals inside internal classes which should limit scope to just the assembly.
To me this feels like incomplete design. They should have simplified scope of all types to a system that clearly consider inheritance but also security and hierarchy of nested types. This would have made the sharing of objects extremely intuitive and granular rather than discovering accessibility of types and members based on an incomplete scoping system.
protected: the variable or method will be available only to child classes (in any assembly)
protected internal: available to child classes in any assembly and to all the classes within the same assembly
I have read out very clear definitions for these terms.
Protected : Access is limited to within the class definition and any class that inherits from the class. The type or member can be accessed only by code in the same class or struct or in a class that is derived from that class.
Internal : Access is limited to exclusively to classes defined within the current project assembly. The type or member can be accessed only by code in same class.
Protected-Internal : Access is limited to current assembly or types derived from containing class.
Think about protected internal as applying two access modifier (protected, and internal) on the same field, property or method.
In the real world, imagine we are issuing privilege for people to visit museum:
Everyone inside the city are allowed to visit museum (internal).
Everyone outside of the city that their parents live here are allowed to visit museum (protected).
And we can put them together in these way:
Everyone inside the city (internal) and everyone outside of city that their parents live here (protected) are allowed to visit the museum (protected internal).
Programming world:
internal: The field is available everywhere in the assembly (project). It is like saying it is public in its project scope (but can not being accessed outside of project scope even by those classes outside of assembly which inherit from that class). Every instance of that type can see it in that assembly (project scope).
protected: simply means that all derived classes can see it (inside or outside of assembly). For example derived classes can see the field or method inside its methods and constructors using: base.NameOfProtectedInternal.
So, putting these two access modifier together (protected internal), you have something that can being public inside the project, and can be seen by those which have inherited from that class inside their scope.
They can be written in the internal protected, and does not change the meaning, but it is convenient to write it protected internal.
Protected Member
Protected Member of a class in only available in the contained class (in which it has been declared) and in the derived class within the assembly and also outside the assembly.
Means if a class that resides outside the assembly can use the protected member of the other assembly by inherited that class only.
We can exposed the Protected member outside the assembly by inherited that class and use it in the derived class only.
Note: Protected members are not accessible using the object in the derived class.
Internal Member
Internal Member of a class is available or access within the assembly either creating object or in a derived class or you can say it is accessible across all the classes within the assembly.
Note: Internal members not accessible outside the assembly either using object creating or in a derived class.
Protected Internal
Protected Internal access modifier is combination Protected or Internal.
Protected Internal Member can be available within the entire assembly in which it declared either creating object or by inherited that class. And can be accessible outside the assembly in a derived class only.
Note: Protected Internal member works as Internal within the same assembly and works as Protected for outside the assembly.
public - The members (Functions & Variables) declared as public can be accessed from anywhere.
private - Private members cannot be accessed from outside the class. This is the default access specifier for a member, i.e if you do not specify an access specifier for a member (variable or function), it will be considered as private. Therefore, string PhoneNumber; is equivalent to private string PhoneNumber.
protected - Protected members can be accessed only from the child classes.
internal - It can be accessed only within the same assembly.
protected internal - It can be accessed within the same assembly as well as in derived class.
Protected internal best suites when you want a member or type to be used in a derived class from another assembly at the same time just want to consume the member or type in the parent assembly without deriving from the class where it is declared.
Also if you want only to use a member or type with out deriving from another class, in the same assembly you can use internal only.
This description might be helpful
Internal Member
Internal Member of a class is available or access within the assembly either creating object or in a derived class or you can say it is accessible across all the classes within the assembly.
Protected Member
Protected Member of a class in only available in the contained class (in which it has been declared) and in the derived class within the assembly and also outside the assembly.
Protected Internal
Protected Internal access modifier is combination Protected or Internal.
Protected Internal Member can be available within the entire assembly in which it declared either creating object or by inherited that class. And can be accessible outside the assembly in a derived class only.