I work on single page app project with API, which is located under mydomain.com/api/ url. Now I need to have separate API for other purpose e.g. mydomain.com/exchangebox/api/.
Is it possible to have both APIs controllers in same WebApi project?
If so, how the application knows which controller to use, if I request /api/person/ or /exchangebox/api/person?
In answer to your questions.. specifically:
1) Is it possible to have both APIs controllers in same WebApi project?
Yes. It is.
2) If so, how the application knows which controller to use, if I request /api/person/ or /exchangebox/api/person?
Routes. MVC and WebAPI is based on routing. I would suggest you read a tutorial or two on what Routes are and how they work.
For example, this tutorial on the ASP.NET website: http://www.asp.net/web-api/overview/web-api-routing-and-actions/routing-in-aspnet-web-api
Related
I am creating an asp.net web api project, I am storing my data in mssql server db, and I am using an Entity Framework. I was following the microsoft guide (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/first-web-api?view=aspnetcore-6.0&tabs=visual-studio), it uses an api controller with entity framework scaffold item. In other guides I found people using controllers derived from ApiController class and the routing there is made via web.config file. What is the actual difference, and what should I use? I suppose I should follow the MC guide cause it is fairly new (was added a week ago).
P.S.: right now, I am not planning to add "view" part to my app, first I want to create all the API calls, but later I whould like to.
Asp.net6 brought new ways of working with controllers, detaching a little from the MVC pattern we had, but this model of yours, if you are following the tutorial, ends up inheriting from the MVC standard ApiController, look at this part of the official tutorial:
Marks the class with the [ApiController] attribute. This attribute
indicates that the controller responds to web API requests. For
information about specific behaviors that the attribute enables, see
Create web APIs with ASP.NET Core. Uses DI to inject the database
context (TodoContext) into the controller. The database context is
used in each of the CRUD methods in the controller. The ASP.NET Core
templates for:
Controllers with views include [action] in the route template. API
controllers don't include [action] in the route template.
well this implies that your controller is being mapped into the aspnet mvc stream and being registered there when you call app.MapControllers(); in your Program.cs
and it's not necessary to configure anything in webConfig, which doesn't even exist anymore since the framework
You can follow the tutorial and everything will be fine.
I am new to asp.net mvc world. So I have a question
I have already developed a web app using Asp.net MVC (also deployed on production).
Currently I am working on mobile apps. For this I need web services (restful).
For Restful web services do I have to make a new project (within existing solution) or can I incorporate Restful webservices into my existing (Asp.net MVC) project ? (I prefer 2nd option if possible)
If I have to make new project for Web Api, then how will I deploy both projects on production knowing that Web Api project is dependent on Asp.net-MVC project ?
One thing you need to understand first is whether it's a web service,wcf service or a Web API the only thing you need is to get a json/xml output which you can use in your mobile app.
Let say you have and asp.net mvc application which has some action methods, but you might be returning a View or PartialView which is not you want for a mobile app to parse. So you need to create an action method which returns JsonResult.
If you want to use all the RESTFul verbs like POST,PUT,GET,DELETE you can add another controller which inherits from APIController and write methods there, but either ways output is same.
So it's up to you what to do and how to proceed, only thing is with an APIController you will have some more verbs and code ahve some special returns like "Ok" e.t.c
I have a client dashboard application, written in ASP.Net MVC 4 (not bound to this version, happy to upgrade). The website is hosted in Windows Azure.
Our clients would like to programmatically access this dashboard, via an API.
Affectively they would like to be able to perform all of the same functions which they normally carry out on the dashboard website, programmatically from code using an HTTP Restful Service.
....My instant reaction was to simply build an ASP.net Web API project, and separate out the shared services/libraries/components from the existing MVC project so that both the API and the MVC website can call the same code base.
Questions
Is it possible to simply create Web API controllers within my existing MVC website project, and expose them over HTTP?
If it is not possible to do "1.", will Azure play nicely if I have an MVC solution, a separate Web API solution, and a shared library project of common services and models? How will I ensure that Azure copies the shared library components into the cloud when I deploy the MVC solution and the Web API solution separately?
Update
Based on the comments, the following implementation of two separate controllers (the original MVC controller within the MVC project, and an additional Web API controller within the same project), does in fact work. Please note that based on the following LINKED ARTICLE, the below implementation would be a "pre-MVC 6" implementation. MVC 6 itself provides the ability to implement both API calls and normally MVC View calls, into a single controller (as opposed to separate controllers that inherit from different base classes).
public class ProductsController : Controller
{
//Products/Index
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
}
public class ProductsAPIController : ApiController
{
// GET api/productsapi/getall
public IEnumerable<string> GetAll()
{
return new string[] { "value1", "value2" };
}
}
To be fair - MVC or WebAPI, as far as your consuming clients are concerned, it shouldn't matter.
Both MVC and WebAPI can create JSON or XML outputs - it's just one makes it a bit easier (WebAPI serializes the relevant response based on the client).
But you can quite easily mix the two together, as others have said, it's as simple as Add New Item
The newest version of MVC (6) has now integrated both technologies into one solution. http://www.asp.net/vnext/overview/aspnet-vnext/create-a-web-api-with-mvc-6
This would be ideally what you are looking for if you can start a new project.
Question 1: Yes it is, just take a look at the article above.
Question 2:
Azure will be fine if you have a MVC solution and also a WebApi solution, but I think you will need to run them under different websites (I'm not 100% on this).
Yes it will work fine. The only potential gotcha is you have to clearly separate your WebAPI routes from your MVC routes (like, for instance having all WebAPI routes under a /api/... prefix, this is the default).
If you do decide to do two separate projects for whatever reason and want to have a shared library, the best solution is to keep that library in a NuGet package on a private feed. TeamCity supports this out of the box, along with other nice features (continuous integration/deployment).
I am developing a new large Web Application using ASP.NET Web API. In that, I want to separate all controller classes into one different class library from ASP.NET MVC project.. Please consider following options.
Case 1 : Keeping controllers in same ASP.NET MVC project
Case 2 : Separating controllers in separate class library
Is it right to go with Case#1 as I think this controller can be reusable by other projects or hosting in windows service instead of IIS Web Application.
Also if in future if I want to access Web-API methods from Android,IPhone native apps then does it works for me in both cases Case#1 and Case#2
Is there any performance issue with Case#2.
What would be the best practice to register multiple controllers in both cases using UnityContainer.RegisterType ?
Putting your Web API code in a different project than your MVC code should be a best practice. There is no reason not to do it.
I am creating a new MVC4 project, and research has lead me to believe that communicating from javascript to the server side is better achieved now through web API framework rather than controller actions. Is my understanding correct on this?
I am presuming that I can share all my attributes etc between web API and MVC controllers so on the face it, it does not seem a massive change for me.
When I am setting up applications, I like to split components out in to projects. My plan was to have a MVC project and a web API project. But I have ran in to issues. For example I have ended up with 2 apps as such, separate routing set up etc etc.
So my question is, in a MVC application should the web API framework sit within the same project, or should the web API be separated into a project of its own and work around the issues?
Unfortunately you are wrong about that - I am presuming that I can share all my attributes etc between web api and mvc controllers so on the face it, it does not seem a massive change for me.
Many of the concepts used by Web API and MVC, even though similar at first glance, are actually not compatible. For example, Web API attributes are System.Web.Http.Filters.Filter and MVC attributes are System.Web.Mvc.Filter - and they are not interchangeable.
Same applies to many other concepts - model binding (completely different mechanisms), routes (Web API uses HTTPRoutes not Routes, even though they both operate on the same underlying RouteTable), dependency resolver (not compatible) and more - even though similar on the surface, are very different in practice. Moreover, Web API does not have a concept of areas.
Ultimately, if all you are trying to do achieve is to have a "new, trendy" way of serving up JSON content - think twice before going down that path. I certainly wouldn't recommend refactoring any existing code unless you are really looking into embracing HTTP and building your app in a RESTful way.
It all really depends on what you are building. If you are starting a new project, and all you need is to serve up some JSON to facilitate your web app - provided you willing to live with some potentially duplicate code (like the stuff I mentioned above), Web API could easily be hosted within the same project as ASP.NET MVC.
I would only separate Web API into a separate project if you are going to build a proper API for your online service - perhaps to be consumed by external customers, or by various devices - such as fueling your mobile apps.
IMO, security and deployment should drive your decision. E.g., if your MVC app uses Forms authentication but you're interested in using Basic authentication (with SSL) for your API, separate projects are going to make your life easier. If you want to host yout site at www.example.com but host your API as api.example.com (vs. www.example.com/api), separate projects will make your life easier. If you separate your projects and subdomain them accordingly and you intend to leverage your own API from your MVC app, you will have to figure out how to deal with the Same Origin Policy issue for client-side calls to your API. Common solutions to this are to leverage jsonp or CORS (preferably if you can).
Update (3/26/2013): Official CORS support is coming: http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=CORS%20support%20for%20ASP.NET%20Web%20API
After some degree of experience (creating API for apps and for mvc). I mostly do both.
I create a separate project for api calls that come from other clients or other devices (Android/IOS apps). One of the reasons is because the authentication is different, it is token based (to keep it stateless). I do not want to mix this within my MVC application.
For my javascript/jquery api calls to my mvc application, I like to keep things simple so I include a web api inside my MVC application. I do not intend to have token based authentication with my javascript api calls, because hey, it's in the same application. I can just use [authorize] attribute on a API endpoint, when a user is not logged in, he will not get the data.
Furthermore, when dealing with shopping carts and you want to store a users shopping cart in a session (while not logged in), you need to have this in your API as well if you add/delete products via your javascript code. This will make your API stateful for sure, but will also reduce the complexity in your MVC-API.
Steven from SimpleInjector (IoC framework) advises two separate projects: What is the difference between DependencyResolver.SetResolver and HttpConfiguration.DependencyResolver in WebAPI
I have recently done almost the same thing: I started with a new MVC 4 web application project choosing the Web API template in VS2012.
This will create a Web API hosted in the same application as MVC.
I wanted to move the ApiControllers into a separate class library project. This was fairly easy but the solution was a bit hidden.
In AssemblyInfo.cs of the MVC 4 project add similar line of code
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(LibraryRegistrator), "Register")]
Now you need the class LibraryRegistrator (feel free to name it whatever)
public class LibraryRegistrator
{
public static void Register()
{
BuildManager.AddReferencedAssembly(Assembly.LoadFrom(HostingEnvironment.MapPath("~/bin/yourown.dll")));
}
}
In the MVC 4 project also add reference to the Api library.
Now you can add Api controllers to your own separate class library (yourown.dll).
Even if your project is so complex as to warrant two "front ends" then I would still only consider splitting out webapi into a separate project as a last resort. You will have deployment headaches and it would be difficult for a newbie to understand the structure of your solution. Not to mention routing issues.
I would aim to keep the system.web namespace isolated in the one "presentation layer". Despite the webapi not being presentational it is still part of the interface of your application. As long as you keep the logic in your domain and not your controllers you should not run into too many problems. Also, don't forget to make use of Areas.
In addition to setup the separate DLL for the Web.Api.
Just a Suggestion:
Create the Project
Nugget WebActivatorEx
Create a a class Method to be called upon app_start
[assembly: WebActivatorEx.PostApplicationStartMethod(typeof(API.AppWebActivator),"Start")]
[assembly:WebActivatorEx.ApplicationShutdownMethod(typeof(API.AppWebActivator), "Shutdown")]
Register a web.api routes inside the Start Method
public static void Start() {
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
}
Reference the Project to the Web Project. to activate the Start Method.
Hope this helps.
I tried to split the API controllers into a new project. All I've done is to create a new library project, moved the controllers inside folder named API.
Then added the reference of the library project to the MVC project.
The webAPI configuration is left in the MVC project itself. It works fine.