I am creating a new MVC4 project, and research has lead me to believe that communicating from javascript to the server side is better achieved now through web API framework rather than controller actions. Is my understanding correct on this?
I am presuming that I can share all my attributes etc between web API and MVC controllers so on the face it, it does not seem a massive change for me.
When I am setting up applications, I like to split components out in to projects. My plan was to have a MVC project and a web API project. But I have ran in to issues. For example I have ended up with 2 apps as such, separate routing set up etc etc.
So my question is, in a MVC application should the web API framework sit within the same project, or should the web API be separated into a project of its own and work around the issues?
Unfortunately you are wrong about that - I am presuming that I can share all my attributes etc between web api and mvc controllers so on the face it, it does not seem a massive change for me.
Many of the concepts used by Web API and MVC, even though similar at first glance, are actually not compatible. For example, Web API attributes are System.Web.Http.Filters.Filter and MVC attributes are System.Web.Mvc.Filter - and they are not interchangeable.
Same applies to many other concepts - model binding (completely different mechanisms), routes (Web API uses HTTPRoutes not Routes, even though they both operate on the same underlying RouteTable), dependency resolver (not compatible) and more - even though similar on the surface, are very different in practice. Moreover, Web API does not have a concept of areas.
Ultimately, if all you are trying to do achieve is to have a "new, trendy" way of serving up JSON content - think twice before going down that path. I certainly wouldn't recommend refactoring any existing code unless you are really looking into embracing HTTP and building your app in a RESTful way.
It all really depends on what you are building. If you are starting a new project, and all you need is to serve up some JSON to facilitate your web app - provided you willing to live with some potentially duplicate code (like the stuff I mentioned above), Web API could easily be hosted within the same project as ASP.NET MVC.
I would only separate Web API into a separate project if you are going to build a proper API for your online service - perhaps to be consumed by external customers, or by various devices - such as fueling your mobile apps.
IMO, security and deployment should drive your decision. E.g., if your MVC app uses Forms authentication but you're interested in using Basic authentication (with SSL) for your API, separate projects are going to make your life easier. If you want to host yout site at www.example.com but host your API as api.example.com (vs. www.example.com/api), separate projects will make your life easier. If you separate your projects and subdomain them accordingly and you intend to leverage your own API from your MVC app, you will have to figure out how to deal with the Same Origin Policy issue for client-side calls to your API. Common solutions to this are to leverage jsonp or CORS (preferably if you can).
Update (3/26/2013): Official CORS support is coming: http://aspnetwebstack.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=CORS%20support%20for%20ASP.NET%20Web%20API
After some degree of experience (creating API for apps and for mvc). I mostly do both.
I create a separate project for api calls that come from other clients or other devices (Android/IOS apps). One of the reasons is because the authentication is different, it is token based (to keep it stateless). I do not want to mix this within my MVC application.
For my javascript/jquery api calls to my mvc application, I like to keep things simple so I include a web api inside my MVC application. I do not intend to have token based authentication with my javascript api calls, because hey, it's in the same application. I can just use [authorize] attribute on a API endpoint, when a user is not logged in, he will not get the data.
Furthermore, when dealing with shopping carts and you want to store a users shopping cart in a session (while not logged in), you need to have this in your API as well if you add/delete products via your javascript code. This will make your API stateful for sure, but will also reduce the complexity in your MVC-API.
Steven from SimpleInjector (IoC framework) advises two separate projects: What is the difference between DependencyResolver.SetResolver and HttpConfiguration.DependencyResolver in WebAPI
I have recently done almost the same thing: I started with a new MVC 4 web application project choosing the Web API template in VS2012.
This will create a Web API hosted in the same application as MVC.
I wanted to move the ApiControllers into a separate class library project. This was fairly easy but the solution was a bit hidden.
In AssemblyInfo.cs of the MVC 4 project add similar line of code
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(LibraryRegistrator), "Register")]
Now you need the class LibraryRegistrator (feel free to name it whatever)
public class LibraryRegistrator
{
public static void Register()
{
BuildManager.AddReferencedAssembly(Assembly.LoadFrom(HostingEnvironment.MapPath("~/bin/yourown.dll")));
}
}
In the MVC 4 project also add reference to the Api library.
Now you can add Api controllers to your own separate class library (yourown.dll).
Even if your project is so complex as to warrant two "front ends" then I would still only consider splitting out webapi into a separate project as a last resort. You will have deployment headaches and it would be difficult for a newbie to understand the structure of your solution. Not to mention routing issues.
I would aim to keep the system.web namespace isolated in the one "presentation layer". Despite the webapi not being presentational it is still part of the interface of your application. As long as you keep the logic in your domain and not your controllers you should not run into too many problems. Also, don't forget to make use of Areas.
In addition to setup the separate DLL for the Web.Api.
Just a Suggestion:
Create the Project
Nugget WebActivatorEx
Create a a class Method to be called upon app_start
[assembly: WebActivatorEx.PostApplicationStartMethod(typeof(API.AppWebActivator),"Start")]
[assembly:WebActivatorEx.ApplicationShutdownMethod(typeof(API.AppWebActivator), "Shutdown")]
Register a web.api routes inside the Start Method
public static void Start() {
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
}
Reference the Project to the Web Project. to activate the Start Method.
Hope this helps.
I tried to split the API controllers into a new project. All I've done is to create a new library project, moved the controllers inside folder named API.
Then added the reference of the library project to the MVC project.
The webAPI configuration is left in the MVC project itself. It works fine.
Related
I'm self hosting web api using owin on client-server application based on MVC architecture. I see a lot of code examples that shows that the Startup class with the configuration, and the Program class with the Main method that start the owin self host "using (WebApp.Start(url: baseAddress))" - are at the same project. Should I desperate owin self host to one project so the WebApp.Start will be in one project, and web api with Startup claas to another one, with all the controllers and so?
The common answer is that it depends. Usually self host applications is very simple to provide some simple functionality. In that case since both parts are simple there is no need to separate them (host code and Asp.Net Mvc) and they can be placed in one project as an application layer. But if you are trying to add some complexity to host code (e.g. some warm up of Asp.Net Mvc app), then may be you should split your host code and Asp.Net Mvc app code in to two projects.
Found that it might be good idea inspired by separation of concerns: the self host should not know about the server and the opposite. Owin and web api have different job so they need to be separated.
I have a client dashboard application, written in ASP.Net MVC 4 (not bound to this version, happy to upgrade). The website is hosted in Windows Azure.
Our clients would like to programmatically access this dashboard, via an API.
Affectively they would like to be able to perform all of the same functions which they normally carry out on the dashboard website, programmatically from code using an HTTP Restful Service.
....My instant reaction was to simply build an ASP.net Web API project, and separate out the shared services/libraries/components from the existing MVC project so that both the API and the MVC website can call the same code base.
Questions
Is it possible to simply create Web API controllers within my existing MVC website project, and expose them over HTTP?
If it is not possible to do "1.", will Azure play nicely if I have an MVC solution, a separate Web API solution, and a shared library project of common services and models? How will I ensure that Azure copies the shared library components into the cloud when I deploy the MVC solution and the Web API solution separately?
Update
Based on the comments, the following implementation of two separate controllers (the original MVC controller within the MVC project, and an additional Web API controller within the same project), does in fact work. Please note that based on the following LINKED ARTICLE, the below implementation would be a "pre-MVC 6" implementation. MVC 6 itself provides the ability to implement both API calls and normally MVC View calls, into a single controller (as opposed to separate controllers that inherit from different base classes).
public class ProductsController : Controller
{
//Products/Index
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
}
public class ProductsAPIController : ApiController
{
// GET api/productsapi/getall
public IEnumerable<string> GetAll()
{
return new string[] { "value1", "value2" };
}
}
To be fair - MVC or WebAPI, as far as your consuming clients are concerned, it shouldn't matter.
Both MVC and WebAPI can create JSON or XML outputs - it's just one makes it a bit easier (WebAPI serializes the relevant response based on the client).
But you can quite easily mix the two together, as others have said, it's as simple as Add New Item
The newest version of MVC (6) has now integrated both technologies into one solution. http://www.asp.net/vnext/overview/aspnet-vnext/create-a-web-api-with-mvc-6
This would be ideally what you are looking for if you can start a new project.
Question 1: Yes it is, just take a look at the article above.
Question 2:
Azure will be fine if you have a MVC solution and also a WebApi solution, but I think you will need to run them under different websites (I'm not 100% on this).
Yes it will work fine. The only potential gotcha is you have to clearly separate your WebAPI routes from your MVC routes (like, for instance having all WebAPI routes under a /api/... prefix, this is the default).
If you do decide to do two separate projects for whatever reason and want to have a shared library, the best solution is to keep that library in a NuGet package on a private feed. TeamCity supports this out of the box, along with other nice features (continuous integration/deployment).
I am developing a new large Web Application using ASP.NET Web API. In that, I want to separate all controller classes into one different class library from ASP.NET MVC project.. Please consider following options.
Case 1 : Keeping controllers in same ASP.NET MVC project
Case 2 : Separating controllers in separate class library
Is it right to go with Case#1 as I think this controller can be reusable by other projects or hosting in windows service instead of IIS Web Application.
Also if in future if I want to access Web-API methods from Android,IPhone native apps then does it works for me in both cases Case#1 and Case#2
Is there any performance issue with Case#2.
What would be the best practice to register multiple controllers in both cases using UnityContainer.RegisterType ?
Putting your Web API code in a different project than your MVC code should be a best practice. There is no reason not to do it.
I'm about to start a new project in ASP.NET MVC5, which has a bit of Web API too. I'll also need a Windows Forms client which will call the API. This client has a file system watcher that detects when a file has been changed, and will post the contents to the API.
When the API receives the data, it does some calculations, and ideally will send the results through SignalR to the browser and update the display.
I'm getting rather stuck trying to work out the authentication. I want to use Individual User Accounts, so the user can log in with the Windows Forms client (and get a token) and in the browser to view the data.
I've got as far as File -> New -> Project, and tried an MVC project with the Web API box checked, and a Web API with the MVC box checked. Looking at the two AccountController classes that these generate, they seem quite different.
I guess the options are
Try to get these two controllers working together
Call the MVC controller from the Windows Forms client
Have two projects in the solution and try to work out how to use SignalR to talk between them.
A better way?
I suspect the last one. I've not used Web API before, so I could be doing this all wrong. What approach should I take?
I would say, create 2 different projects, 1 for MVC 1 for API.
Use 1 BLL which is referenced in both of them and carries the logic for both of them and will not be dealing with separate controllers.
Of course if you need other layers like DataAccess or Repository, you have to create them once and they will be referenced in the BLL which is later referenced in both MVC and API interfaces.
I'm just starting a project where I would like to use Kendo UI (based on jquery) with C#. A few weeks ago I was successful in handling requests using Web Services (asmx), was pleased with the results and performance, and was able to create forms quickly.
Since this is a new project, I thought I could look into different concepts such as MVC and WebApi. I found MVC to be the most complicaded so I went for WebApi and started playing with controllers and requests. So far what I'm finding (don't judge me, I'm new to these new concepts), is that Web Service seems to be simpler and more flexible.
So I guess what I'm looking for is... what are the main advantages of using MVC vs WebApi and even vs Web Services. Are there any downsides to Web Services? Would it be a bad practice to have my data layer controlled by Entity Framework, all models defined, and my requests handled by Web Services?
Any clarifications are welcome. Thank you.
In a broader sense, Web API is used to create Web Services ! It uses HTTP as its standard for creating services (instead of SOAP like in asmx) as its more open and any type of client like a mobile app, desktop app, web app etc will understand HTTP protocol. Another advantage is that u can easily use JavaScript/jQuery to communicate with your Web API. With SOAP web services, its a nightmare!
Kendo UI and Web API is a great combination. We have recently created a mobile iPad app using this combination and it worked like a charm. We also used Entity Framework with oracle as back end DB and it never gave any issues.
Webservices are nice if you have the need for it. A need as in needing that logic/data in more than one different type of application (such as web, and a mobile app, and a desktop app). (Or if you want to sell the service you're providing)
Using a webservice for ONLY a website which you don't except to expand to other things is complete overkill.
Furthermore, the MVC framework and the Web Api framework are pretty similar except web api is used exclusively for webservices. Coding in both of them will be the difference between white bread and wheat bread.