In my solution we have projects both in c#, that controls some GUI and networking work, and c++, that manages some hardware interactions. In my c# project I have the proper PInvokes and am able to use the c++ output dll with no issue but in order to do it, I have to manually copy the output dll to the build directory or create a build script that manages the copy.
My issue with this method is that the solution, in reality, has many many projects, something like 150 at the moment, covering c++, c, c#, and vb.net. We create and delete projects all the time and managing the copy scripts is becoming a major pain. Especially since not all of the projects rely on each other and we have like 20 different build configurations.
Is it possible to simply have the c# project reference the c++ project and automatically copy the project output the same way it does with other managed projects without using post build scripts?
Well, the way I do it and have always done it is by obviously using Visual Studio, and assuming this C++ projects are VS projects you can easily create a VS Solution containing multiple projects that you can organize with "Solution Folders". The organization of your projects inside the solution is really up to how you want to organize it. It resembles a file system with nested folders. Needless to say that you can host projects in different languages such as C++, C#, VB...I'm not too sure if you can include a C project or not, that's out of my expertise.
See a screenshot below of a solution I created to demonstrate this...
Notice that "Business" has a nested solution folder (Utils) which contains a C++ project (ERM.CPPLibraries) and a VB project (ERM.VBLibraries). Then if you reference projects within the solution (Right click -> Add Reference), you will not need to copy the output assemblies everytime you compile your solution (or project(s)) VS is smart enough to resolve all dependencies, resolve them and update them.
Hope it gives you an idea
Edit based on comment
In simple words...No, it's not possible to reference a unmanaged project from a managed project in a VS solution. You can reference DLLs but not projects itself
I have a small solution with 2 projects "Class Library" independent, ie, no project is used as a reference in another.
The first project is called "Extension1" and the second "extension2". I would not want to use this solution in another project and having to reference the two dlls separately, I need to create a single dll "CustomExtension.dll" and that it has the two ("Extension1.dll" and "Extension2.dll") to reference only dll "CustomExtension.dll" on a new project using only the respective namespace. Is this possible?
PS: Windows 8 - Visual Studio 2010 Professional - C#
Might want to take a look at ILMerge. We use it in a lot of our projects for combining multiple dll's into one.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/mbarnett/ilmerge.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=17630
It seems like this could be a very tedious task. Take a look at this answer to a previous question:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/6573711/329928
You have to do that by compiling the code using csc.exe outside visual
studio and passing the command-line parameters yourself (all .cs
files).
This will be a bit tedious but can be done. Look here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/78f4aasd.aspx
There are a lot of variables and methods in my program and I want to seperate some of them in other class files. But as the program grows the methods and functions can change.
I searched on the net but many people generally speaking for dll files. Without making a dll file, how can I arrange my code and split into small class files?
Yes, just split it out in to a separate file in a new class but still inside the same project. The term for what you are doing is called Code Refactoring. There are some tools built in to Visual Studio to make it easier to do, and there are some 3rd party tools that add even more features to make it easier to do.
But all it boils down to is just making new classes in the same project and referencing those new classes from where you took the code out from.
You can add folders to your solution. Classes are by default a namespaceprovider, so that classes in this folder have a different namespace.
For example if your default-namespace is MyNameSpace and you create a folder called Entity then all classes in this folder have the namespace MyNameSpace.Entity
And all Items in a project are compiled to one single dll or exe
Just add more classes to the project and put the data and behavior (methods) into the appropriate classes. The project will still build into a single exe or dll.
Generally, it's better to add a second project under the same solution call it "CommonLib" or something like that. Then you add it as a reference to the main application and set up the project so that the applications build depends on the libraries build. Add a using statement for the common lib where ever you want to use those objects. This is definitely better for large scale or enterprise applications. There's a pretty decent chance that somewhere down the line you'll want to reuse some of this code, if everything builds into a single exe that won't be an option.
Can you mix vb and c# files in the same project for a class library? Is there some setting that makes it possible?
I tried and none of the intellisense works quite right, although the background compiler seems to handle it well enough (aside from the fact that I, then, had 2 classes in the same namespace with the same name and it didn't complain).
We're trying to convert from VB to C# but haven't finished converting all the code. I have some new code I need to write, but didn't really want to make a new project just for it.
No, you can't. An assembly/project (each project compiles to 1 assembly usually) has to be one language. However, you can use multiple assemblies, and each can be coded in a different language because they are all compiled to CIL.
It compiled fine and didn't complain because a VB.NET project will only actually compile the .vb files and a C# project will only actually compile the .cs files. It was ignoring the other ones, therefore you did not receive errors.
Edit: If you add a .vb file to a C# project, select the file in the Solution Explorer panel and then look at the Properties panel, you'll notice that the Build Action is 'Content', not 'Compile'. It is treated as a simple text file and doesn't even get embedded in the compiled assembly as a binary resource.
Edit: With asp.net websites you may add c# web user control to vb.net website
Well, actually I inherited a project some years ago from a colleague who had decided to mix VB and C# webforms within the same project. That worked but is far from fun to maintain.
I decided that new code should be C# classes and to get them to work I had to add a subnode to the compilation part of web.config
<codeSubDirectories>
<add directoryName="VB"/>
<add directoryName="CS"/>
</codeSubDirectories>
The all VB code goes into a subfolder in the App_Code called VB and the C# code into the CS subfolder. This will produce two .dll files. It works, but code is compiled in the same order as listed in "codeSubDirectories" and therefore i.e Interfaces should be in the VB folder if used in both C# and VB.
I have both a reference to a VB and a C# compiler in
<system.codedom>
<compilers>
The project is currently updated to framework 3.5 and it still works (but still no fun to maintain..)
You can not mix vb and c# within the same project - if you notice in visual studio the project files are either .vbproj or .csproj. You can within a solution - have 1 proj in vb and 1 in c#.
Looks like according to this you can potentially use them both in a web project in the App_Code directory:
http://pietschsoft.com/post/2006/03/30/ASPNET-20-Use-VBNET-and-C-within-the-App_Code-folder.aspx
It might be possible with some custom MSBuild development. The supplied .targets force the projects to be single language - but there's no runtime or tooling restriction preventing this.
Both the VB and CS compilers can output to modules - the CLR's version of .obj files. Using the assembly linker, you could take the modules from the VB and CS code and produce a single assembly.
Not that this would be a trival effort, but it probably would work.
Walkthrough: Using Multiple Programming Languages in a Web Site Project http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms366714.aspx
By default, the App_Code folder does not allow multiple programming languages. However, in a Web site project you can modify your folder structure and configuration settings to support multiple programming languages such as Visual Basic and C#. This allows ASP.NET to create multiple assemblies, one for each language. For more information, see Shared Code Folders in ASP.NET Web Projects. Developers commonly include multiple programming languages in Web applications to support multiple development teams that operate independently and prefer different programming languages.
Yes its possible.adding c# and vb.net projects into a single solution.
step1: File->Add->Existing Project
Step2: Project->Add reference->dll or exe of project which u added before.
step3: In vb.net form where u want to use c# forms->import namespace of project.
Although Visual Studio does not support this (you can do some tricks and get MSBuild to compile both, but not from within Visual Studio), SharpDevelop does. You can have both in the same solution (as long as you are running Visual Studio Professional and above), so the easiest solution if you want to keep using Visual Studio is to seperate your VB code into a different project and access it that way.
Why don't you just compile your VB code into a library(.dll).Reference it later from your code and that's it. Managed dlls contain MSIL to which both c# and vb are compiled.
Right-click the Project. Choose Add Asp.Net Folder.
Under The Folder, create two folders one named VBCodeFiles and the Other CSCodeFiles
In Web.Config add a new element under compilation
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5.1">
<codeSubDirectories>
<add directoryName="VBCodeFiles"/>
<add directoryName="CSCodeFiles"/>
</codeSubDirectories>
</compilation>
Now, Create an cshtml page.
Add a reference to the VBCodeFiles.Namespace.MyClassName using
#using DMH.VBCodeFiles.Utils.RCMHD
#model MyClassname
Where MyClassName is an class object found in the namespace above.
now write out the object in razor using a cshtml file.
<p>#Model.FirstName</p>
Please note, the directoryName="CSCodeFiles" is redundant if this is a C# Project and the directoryName="VBCodeFiles" is redundant if this is a VB.Net project.
I don't see how you can compile a project with the C# compiler (or the VB compiler) and not have it balk at the wrong language for the compiler.
Keep your C# code in a separate project from your VB project. You can include these projects into the same solution.
You need one project per language. I'm quite confident I saw a tool that merged assemblies, if you find that tool you should be good to go. If you need to use both languages in the same class, you should be able to write half of it in say VB.net and then write the rest in C# by inheriting the VB.net class.
At the risk of echoing every other answer, no, you cannot mix them in the same project.
That aside, if you just finished converting VB to C#, why would you write new code in VB?
For .net 2.0 this works. It DOES compile both in the same project if you create sub directories of in app code with the related language code. As of yet, I am looking for whether this should work in 3.5 or not though.
As others have said, you can't put both in one project. However, if you just have a small piece of C# or VB code that you want to include in a project in the other language, there are automatic conversion tools. They're not perfect, but they do most things pretty well. Also, SharpDevelop has a conversion utility built in.
No, not in the same project.but you can use them in the same solution.
though you need to take care that your code is CLS compliant. That means you must not have used such functionality/feature that is not understand by other language. For example VB does not understand unsigned ints.
In our scenario, its a single VB.NET project (Windows Desktop application) in a single solution. However we wanted to take advantage of C# features like signed/unsigned integers and XML literals and string features in VB.NET. So depending on the features, at runtime we build the code file, compile using respective Rosalyn compiler (VB/CS) into DLL and dynamically load into current assembly. Of course we had to work on delinking, unloading, reloading, naming etc of the dynamic DLLs and the memory management were we largely used dynamic GUID for naming to avoid conflict.
It works fine where app user may connect to any DB from our desktop app, write SQL query, convert the connection to LINQ connection and write LINQ queries too which all requires dynamic building of source code, compiling into DLL and attaching to current assembly.
Yes, You can add both of the file in web site only.If the project is a web application it will not allow different type of file.