I am writing the code with my team by usin0 the Bitbucket service. The problem is the following:
Since yesterday, when I downloaded the last commit from our public repository I see all projects (folders) but in visual studio where I want to run the application the compiler tells me that some libraries, projects or references are missing. At the same time I see only one of four projects in visual studio(while it must be four). I've tried to rebuild the solution but this does not help.
When I asked one of my colleagues about the problem, he told me that this is a standard procedure and he will give me the access to all libraries and projects when the work will be finished.
My question is: Can I do something to got the access to all missing files?
P.S. I am the owner of Bitbucket repository
Check with your colleague their solution build before pushing new changes and all the dependencies / changes to packages.config and project files are pushed in.
Usually a clean and rebuild and a compare between project files will tell you what are the differences.
P.S. if you have a .gitignore file check that too, in case someone added something that is required to your project.
I have a C# WinForms project, which I am working on in Visual Studio 2017 (although it was originally created in the 2015 version).
I don't recall having done anything special, but it has added a file called .dtbcache, that it wants to add to git. The file has no extension, and a Google search doesn't show any results.
The file is located in ..\repos\myprject\.vs\MyProject\DesignTimeBuild. Which means that the "dtb" part of the file name probably means design time build, but that doesn't really make it that much better.
Can I delete it or add it to .gitignore? I would prefer not to include it in our git repository, unless it is required.
Short answer: You can safely exclude it from your Git repo.
Long answer:
You're right that dtb stands for Design Time Build. This is a file automatically created by VS2017, with a bit more information here and here (links to a blog from someone working on the Visual Studio project system). In summary, it's Visual Studio more or less extrapolating what files will be produced in order to make sure Intellisense is fully available as intended.
From the linked articles, one of the purposes of this is to make sure Visual Studio has an answer in certain cases:
Given an assembly reference in the project file, what assembly on disk is that reference going to actually refer to at compile time?
Given a XAML file, what is the code that is going to be generated by the XAML compiler at compile time going to look like?
Given a glob file pattern (*.cs), what files are actually going to be included at compile time?
So the files, being generated on the fly, are not needed in your Git repo, and can safely be excluded. Moreover, from what I can tell, these files are specifically made and used by Visual Studio 2017.
I have a Visual Studio solution, for which I'm trying to keep the code fairly well separated, so I'm using quite a lot of projects.
I've got a handful of projects that use all the other projects (Unit-tests, a Bench-marker, a "Main" project). And a couple of the existing projects are going to be used by all the projects (core dependencies, utility projects, etc.)
The upshot is that each time I create a project, I have to give each project in the first group a reference pointing to that new project, and I have give the new project a reference pointing to each project in the second group.
I also have to add any common nuget packages I want (e.g. MoreLinq)
Is there any way to tell VS about these things and get it to do them automatically when I add a new project?
(Running VS2013 if it's relevant)
================================================
Note: It's entirely possible that the correct answer is "you're using too many projects". If you think so, thank you, but please don't feel the need to comment - that's not the question I'm interested in answering at the moment.
You could create a project template new projects in your solution.
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xkh1wxd8(v=vs.120).aspx for more details.
I created a brand new blank Visual Studio 2010 solution, and added an existing C# Project to it. I built the solution and it compiled correctly.
But when I go the solution folder, I see that the imported C# project is not physically in that folder. It seems it only references the project to wherever it is.
Is this intended? Should I even worry about this?
How can I create a physical import, meaning the project is copied to the solution folder?
How can I create a physical import, meaning the project is copied to the solution folder?
If you want to do this, copy the project to the solution (outside of VS), then add the local copy directly.
The default behavior allows you to share a project between two solutions. This is occasionally useful (if handled with care).
'How do I create a physical import?'
You don't - you're adding a project to the solution which will always result in referencing it in-place. In order to structure your solution you need to copy or move the existing project to the desired folder, created any desired Solution Folders to match the physical structure and then Add existing project as needs be.
The other alternative is to Add new project and then copy all of your project data over from the existing one but this will be prone to errors at some levels.
Adding an existing project always makes reference to the original. That makes sense in a lot of cases. If you want to use the project in a number of solutions and you want to make sure that they are always using the same version then you have the choice to either just reference the compiled library or have it available in each solution. If you do have it available in each solution then the risk is that you will make some mod of it in one solution that breaks the others. I am pretty good at doing this!
As mentioned already if you want to modify that project and don't mind if it gets out of sync with other versions of it then you need to copy it into your solution folder and then add it from there.
The version control software I use pretty much forces me to do that as it does not like code that is not located inside the solution tree.
It's not code-related but IDE related. I'm working on a .NET solution with about 35 different projects. These projects need to be re-organized into a new folder structure. Why? Because about 10 of those will be removed and the rest will be divided in more logical units.
One way to do this is by creating a new solution, Drag&Drop the projects into a new folder tree within the Windows explorer and then just add them to the new solution.
To be honest, that sounds dumb!
Is there a way to just move projects into different folders from within the IDE? I've tried to "save as" the projects but the IDE won't accept a different folder.
It's irritating but because there have been a few wrong choices in folder names, I'm now stuck with those names.
Example: Right now I have a project main folder which contains child folders named "Client", "Server", "Business", "Database" and whatever more. Within those child folders, there are more child folders, each a three-digit number. Within each numbered folder there's a project which is named in some logical way, like Company.Business.Customers with additional logic within this project.
The problem is that not all projects now follow this naming convention and I consider it obsolete.
A project like Company.Business.Customers should just be in a folder named Company.Business.Customers in the project root so it's easier to recognize. The name already makes it clear that it's a business class for this project. The clear division within client classes, business classes and whatever more just needs to be arranged within the solution, but I want to flatten the file structure. (And remove some obsolete projects.) Basically, I'm not refactoring, I'm just cleaning up.
VS2008 doesn't seem to have such an option, though...
Fire up notepad.exe and open the .sln file. And start Windows Explorer, navigate to the solution directory. Observe how the .sln file content matches the solution structure. Edit the entries, make the corresponding change with Explorer. Backup first.
I don't think there's an easy answer here. Your main problem is going to be that Visual Studio (or .NET) doesn't care if you have classes that belong to a different root namespace sitting in a project.
So if you have a project called Project.BusinessObjects and another project called Project.DataObjects there is nothing stopping you from putting a class called Project.BusinessObjects.User into the Project.DataObjects project.
I don't know of any way of doing all of this without a lot of manual work. Resharper will help quite a bit if you use the 'namespace rename' feature, but you're still gonna end up with a lot of grunt work.
Also, be VERY wary of doing this in conjunction with version control systems. You have to know your version control system really well to know how it's going to react to such major refactoring.
Other than that, what you are describing doing is not all that difficult. You do have to edit the solution files and maybe the project files by hand, and you might need to remove a project from a solution and add it again when it's under the right directory.
I would make a backup, and then refactor away. I think it is a mistake to think that you can do everything you need from the IDE, though. And if you do what you describe from the IDE in a source control system that uses the old Visual SourceSafe API, you will certianly (guaranteed) mess up your bindings, that API is just not made for moving (or renaming, for that matter) files around in the way you describe. The best way to do this under that scenario is to remove all source control bindings and then re-add the reorganized solution back in.
It's not that difficult, you just have to prepare (do a backup) and experiment until you get it right.
I don't think there's any way to do this from within Visual Studio, and as #gmagana points out it's going to be very difficult to do if the files are under version control.
However, it is possible to do it manually.
Start by creating the new, desired folder structure - ignore the .csproj files and solution files for now, and more the .cs files you're interested in into the new structure.
Now, fire up Visual Studio, and create a new, empty project. If you have different types of projects, you might want to create one new, empty project for each type. This will leave you with an empty .csproj file, and a .sln file with just one project.
Copy the empty project file to where they're needed, and rename them as needed. You can edit them and change the Assembly name and default namespace if you want, or wait until you're done and change the settings with Visual Studio.
Finally, edit the .sln file, and remove the Project section. Copy the empty .sln file to where you want it, and open it up in Visual Studio. Now go and add each of your existing projects to the new solution.
Within each project, click the "show all" button, and start including all the files you've copied into the project structure. Resolve missing dependencies, change the namespaces and assembly names for the project, and make sure that the code files don't specify a namespace you don't want. Repeat until done.
Once you get the new solution to build, it will be helpful to open up the DLLs in Reflector in order to ensure that you haven't missed any namespace declarations in the code file - if you're trying to get to a point where there's a 1-1 correspondence between the DLL and the namespace, or even ensuring that no namespaces are split between DLLs, Reflector is your friend.
Good luck.
I've used the following solution to solve my problem:
I started with a new, empty solution in a new folder.
For every project that needed to be moved, I used the Windows explorer to create a child folder in the solution folder, this time with the proper name.
I copied the projects from their original location to their new folders.
I added all the (moved) existing projects from their new locations.
In the Solution Manager, I renamed the projects to a better name.
I fixed the project properties and other settings for all projects.
This did clean up the whole project quite nicely. I then added the whole project to Vault (Version Control System) and once it was in the VSS, I deleted the folder again (actually, just renamed it first) and retrieved it back from the VSS system so any obsolete binaries and other garbage was gone too.
It's a lot of work, but the result turned out exactly what it needed.