I am quite new to WCF and trying to get my head around the security. I am still reading and learning, but I came to a point where I got a working version of WCF with Certificate authentication. I know that the code has some weaknesses; however, my initial goal was to create communication using certificate authentication. Also, I wanted to create everything programmatically (no Web.config configurations for the services or clients). The reason for this is that the client should be able to link an Assembly (Class Library) and get access to the server. Also, I am loading the certificates from the file system (again, I know this is not secure). I would like to get a little bit feedback.
The following client snippet is creating an object that I can use to connect to the server. The anonymous type T is my service interface e.g. IService.
Here is my client implementation:
var url = "URL TO WS";
var binding = new WSHttpBinding
{
Security =
{
Mode = SecurityMode.Message,
Message = {ClientCredentialType = MessageCredentialType.Certificate}
}
};
var endpoint = new EndpointAddress(url);
var channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<T>(binding, endpoint);
if (channelFactory.Credentials != null)
{
channelFactory.Credentials.ClientCertificate.Certificate =
new X509Certificate2(#"PATH\TO\Client.pfx"); // Client Certificate PRIVATE & PUBLIC Key
channelFactory.Credentials.ServiceCertificate.Authentication.CertificateValidationMode = X509CertificateValidationMode.None; // I know this is not good, but I dont have a valid certificate from a trusted entity
}
wcfClient = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
return wcfClient;
The service is a bit more complex. I use .svc files with their code-behind. If I understand the use of .svc files correctly, then I believe this is the entry point where the .NET framework creates a ServiceHost and automatically opens it? In my implementation I do not open the ServiceHost, I only implemented a ServiceHostFactoryBase and referenced it in the .svc Markup language. Look at the Factory section - this is the part where I implement my custom Host Factory.
<%# ServiceHost Language="C#" Debug="true"
Service="Service.Services.LevelService" CodeBehind="LevelService.svc.cs"
Factory="Service.Security.ServiceHostFactory.HostFactory" %>
And my custom Host Factory looks like this:
public class HostFactory : ServiceHostFactoryBase
{
public override ServiceHostBase CreateServiceHost(string constructorString, Uri[] baseAddresses)
{
var serviceType = Type.GetType(constructorString);
if (serviceType.GetInterfaces().Count() != 1)
throw new NotImplementedException("The service can only have one implemented interface");
var interfaceType = serviceType.GetInterfaces()[0];
var myServiceHost = new ServiceHost(serviceType, baseAddresses);
var httpBinding = new WSHttpBinding();
httpBinding.Security.Message.ClientCredentialType = MessageCredentialType.Certificate;
httpBinding.Security.Mode = SecurityMode.Message;
myServiceHost.Credentials.ServiceCertificate.Certificate = new X509Certificate2(#"PATH\TO\Server.pfx");
myServiceHost.Credentials.ClientCertificate.Authentication.CertificateValidationMode = X509CertificateValidationMode.Custom;
myServiceHost.Credentials.ClientCertificate.Authentication.CustomCertificateValidator = new MyX509CertificateValidator();
myServiceHost.Credentials.ClientCertificate.Certificate = new X509Certificate2(#"PATH\TO\Client.cer");
myServiceHost.AddServiceEndpoint(interfaceType, httpBinding, String.Empty);
return myServiceHost;
}
}
The custom validator doess't do much yet, but here it is as well:
public class MyX509CertificateValidator : X509CertificateValidator
{
public override void Validate(X509Certificate2 certificate)
{
// Check that there is a certificate.
if (certificate == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("certificate");
}
// Check that the certificate issuer matches the configured issuer.
//throw new SecurityTokenValidationException("Certificate was not issued by a trusted issuer");
}
}
If I understand correctly, the Server has ONLY the PUBLIC key of the client registered since I only reference the .cer file.
My big question is now, if I would like to get anything like this on a production server - and lets assume nobody will actually get the executables (including the certificates), would this be a possible solution to keep unwanted people out of my webservice? Basically, I don't want anybody else consuming my webservice - only if you have the proper certificate. Also, how much of an issue is the part where I set on the client:
CertificateValidationMode = X509CertificateValidationMode.None
I know there are many questions - but overall, I would like to know if I made some fundamental mistakes in this implementation.
Ok,
after going through a lot of tutorials and demo applications, I figured out that the best way to go ahead is actually using the Certificate Store on Windows. However, I still might consider a hybrid solution where the Server has the certificates in the Certificate store and the client has it embedded in a resource. If you are struggling with WCF and Certificates, have a look at those links:
IIS7 Permissions Overview - ApplicationPoolIdentity
I was able to create Transport as well as Message secured WCF web services. I would suggest to READ the linked articles because there is so much information that will make you understand certificates and their usage. Especially when dealing with self-singed certificates!
I ended up implementing wsHttpBinding using Message Security Mode + Client Certificate with ChainTrust.
Hope this will help someone else!
Related
I'm kind of new to the whole WCF and SOAP topic so please be kind.
I'm using a generated SOAP Client with .net6. In another project we successfully worked with the same Web Service using the old .net Framework 2.0 Web References and the same credentials.
Strange enough everything seemed to work fine at first. Until I realized, that it does not use the given credentials to authenticate. Instead it authenticates with my own domain user.
I also tried to get it to work with explicitly setting the binding with a BasicHttpBinding but I only could get the same broken logic to work or I got various authentication/protocol/security errors.
So it seems the authentication is basically working. It just doesn't use the provided credentials. So my question is: How can I configure it to work with the provided identity?
I also found out that it might have anything to do with a cached Windows token. But how can I get rid of it. How to prevent caching in the first place?
EDIT:
Specified the variable types explicitly.
string url = "http://someServer/AdministrationService.asmx";
AdministrationServiceSoapClient client = new AdministrationServiceSoapClient(
AdministrationServiceSoapClient.EndpointConfiguration.AdministrationServiceSoap,
url);
WindowsClientCredential credential = client.ClientCredentials.Windows;
credential.ClientCredential.UserName = "username";
credential.ClientCredential.Password = "password";
credential.ClientCredential.Domain = "DOMAIN";
GetServerInfoRequest getServerInfoRequest = new GetServerInfoRequest
{
// some stuff set here
};
GetServerInfoRequest getServerInfoReply = await client.GetServerInfoAsync(getServerInfoRequest);
As far as I know, BasicHttpBinding has security disabled by default, but can be added setting the BasicHttpSecurityMode to a value other than None in the constructor. It can be configured according to the instructions in BasicHttpBinding and BasicHttpBinding Constructors.
By default, setting up client credentials involves two steps: determining the type of client credential required by the service and specifying an actual client credential, as described in this document.
After waiting a day it is working. It seems that the cached credentials became invalid somehow.
Strange enough the simple service creation from above is not working anymore. Instead I have to use the following.
var client = new AdministrationServiceSoapClient(
new BasicHttpBinding()
{
Security = new BasicHttpSecurity()
{
Mode = BasicHttpSecurityMode.TransportCredentialOnly,
Message = new BasicHttpMessageSecurity()
{
ClientCredentialType = BasicHttpMessageCredentialType.UserName,
},
Transport = new HttpTransportSecurity()
{
ClientCredentialType = HttpClientCredentialType.Windows,
ProxyCredentialType = HttpProxyCredentialType.Windows,
}
},
},
new EndpointAddress(url));
I am writing a piece of software that runs on a utility device on a customers network, but not on the domain. The autodiscover service is not available off domain the same as it is either on the domain or even on the internet. None of the ways the service works by default will find it according to the docs, but the customer's IT staff tells me, supposedly :/ , it will all work if I can access Autodiscover at the link they gave me. Is there any way to override the default approach and pass it this url to autodiscover from? Hardcoding the link to /exchange.asmx is not an option nor is adding this device to the domain.
I am reusing, and now tweaking, a tried and true piece of software that has been deployed many times, but this situation is a first.
Using the EWS Managed API you may be able to do it using the AutodiscoverService class. It has a constructor that takes the URI of the Autodiscover service as a parameter.
Your code should look something like this. Note that I disable SCP lookup as you are not on a domain. I have not actually tried this code but give it a try:
AutodiscoverService ads = new AutodiscoverService(new Uri("..."));
ads.EnableScpLookup = false;
ads.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(...);
ads.RedirectionUrlValidationCallback = delegate { return true; };
GetUserSettingsResponse grResp = ads.GetUserSettings("someemail#domain.com", UserSettingName.ExternalEwsUrl);
Uri casURI = new Uri(grResp.Settings[UserSettingName.ExternalEwsUrl].ToString());
var service = new ExchangeService()
{
Url = casURI,
Credentials = ads.Credentials,
};
This question has been discussed in several topics here but I could not find the answer for me.
What I'm trying to do is use an IP camera through the Onvif interface. I've generated the web services from the WSDL files available in the Onvif homepage, and added the custom SOAP authentication code as suggested here, and I am able to retrieve the device capabilities etc. etc.
But for some services, e.g, PTZ control, also HTTP authentication is needed. My code removes the ClientCredentials behaivor (so yeah, I guess setting them does not make any sense, but I still left those lines in hope that maybe the HTTP transport would try to use them):
HttpTransportBindingElement httpBindingElement = new HttpTransportBindingElement();
httpBindingElement.AuthenticationScheme = AuthenticationSchemes.Basic;
...
PTZClient ptzClient = new PTZClient(customBinding, endPointAddress);
ptzClient.Endpoint.Behaviors.Remove(typeof(System.ServiceModel.Description.ClientCredentials));
UsernameClientCredentials onvifCredentials = new UsernameClientCredentials(new UsernameInfo(_username, _password));
ptzClient.Endpoint.Behaviors.Add(onvifCredentials);
ptzClient.ClientCredentials.UserName.UserName = _username;
ptzClient.ClientCredentials.UserName.Password = _password;
Still when I look at wireshark, i see that the SOAP authentication is generated but no HTTP authentication header is set (well, I already expected that since i have a custom behaivor here). So the question is, if I am creating the binding this way, what are my best options to add HTTP authentication headers? Can I just add a message inspector, and if so, any examples? Must I create a different transport binding? I've seen people advising others to use BasicHttpBinding and then setting the Security property on that, but where do the credentials go in that case and how do I apply the BasicHttpBinding instance to my binding? Are there any callbacks in the WCF that get triggered by the HTTP 401 code that i can hook up to and then provide the header? This is actually my first experience with WCF and so far I've done everything from examples found in the internet, but as for this particular issue I haven't been able to find anything.
If anyone is interested this is how I got it working. I combined the BasicHttpBinding with the client credentials in a following way:
TransportSecurityBindingElement transportSecurity = new TransportSecurityBindingElement();
// UsernameCredentials is a class implementing WS-UsernameToken authentication
transportSecurity.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.SignedEncrypted.Add(new UsernameTokenParameters());
transportSecurity.AllowInsecureTransport = true;
transportSecurity.IncludeTimestamp = false;
TextMessageEncodingBindingElement messageEncoding = new TextMessageEncodingBindingElement(MessageVersion.Soap12, Encoding.UTF8);
HttpClientCredentialType[] credentialTypes = new HttpClientCredentialType[3] { HttpClientCredentialType.None, HttpClientCredentialType.Basic, HttpClientCredentialType.Digest };
...
foreach (HttpClientCredentialType credentialType in credentialTypes)
{
BasicHttpBinding httpBinding = new BasicHttpBinding(BasicHttpSecurityMode.TransportCredentialOnly);
httpBinding.Security.Transport.ClientCredentialType = credentialType;
BindingElementCollection elements = new BindingElementCollection(new BindingElement[1]{messageEncoding});
foreach(BindingElement element in httpBinding.CreateBindingElements())
{
if (element is TextMessageEncodingBindingElement)
continue;
elements.Add(element);
}
CustomBinding customBinding = new CustomBinding(elements);
DeviceClient deviceClient = new DeviceClient(customBinding, endPointAddress);
if (credentialType == HttpClientCredentialType.Basic)
{
// Set all credentials, not sure from which one WCF actually takes the value
deviceClient.ClientCredentials.UserName.UserName = pair[0];
deviceClient.ClientCredentials.UserName.Password = pair[1];
}
else if (credentialType == HttpClientCredentialType.Digest)
{
deviceClient.ClientCredentials.HttpDigest.AllowedImpersonationLevel = System.Security.Principal.TokenImpersonationLevel.Delegation;
deviceClient.ClientCredentials.HttpDigest.ClientCredential.UserName = pair[0];
deviceClient.ClientCredentials.HttpDigest.ClientCredential.Password = pair[1];
}
}
This works efficiently with a device for which we do not know the authentication mode and works on both (HTTP/SOAP) authentication level.
I detailed how HTTP digest works in another answer.
Remember that only functions of class PRE_AUTH, according to ยง5.12.1 of the Core spec, require authentication.
You should invoke a function of any class but PRE_AUTH without any form authentication. If you get a HTTP 401 then you have to use HTTP digset, otherwise you'll have to got with WS-UsernameToken.
You can't directly use HTTP digest because you'll need at least the device to send you the challange for HTTP digest.
I'm trying to build a system working with ADFS and claims. At the moment, this is just a "toy" implementation.
I've built a very simple MVC web application, set it up using the "Identity and Access..." wizard in Visual Studio to talk to an ADFS 2.0 server, and deployed it to an IIS server. All works fine, and I can examine and list the received claims.
The next step is to build a Web API based REST service (representing back-end services that the MVC application is going to depend on), so I want to pass the credentials across to that back-end server so that it can make suitable authorization decisions.
So the first step is for me to create the delegation token (and I'll then, hopefully, work out what to do with it in terms of the HttpClient class to make the rest call). I've got this:
//We need to take the bootstrap token and create an appropriate ActAs token
var rst = new RequestSecurityToken
{
AppliesTo = new EndpointReference("https://other-iis.example.com/Rest"),
RequestType = RequestTypes.Issue,
KeyType = KeyTypes.Symmetric,
ActAs = new SecurityTokenElement(((BootstrapContext)((ClaimsIdentity)User.Identity).BootstrapContext).SecurityToken)
};
var sts = new SecurityTokenService(); //This line isn't valid
var resp = sts.Issue(System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal as ClaimsPrincipal, rst);
But, the issue is that SecurityTokenService is abstract. I can't find any types derived from this class in either System.IdentityModel nor System.IdentityModel.Services, and the above doesn't include any reference to the ADFS server which I'll obviously need to provide at some point.
Of course, I may be going down completely the wrong route also, or am just hitting a minor stumbling block and not seeing a much larger one looming in the distance, so any advice on that would be appreciated also.
I've looked at, for example, Identity Delegation Scenario, but that uses CreateChannelActingAs, which I don't think is going to work when I'm talking to a rest service (or will it?), and also doesn't seem to apply to .NET 4.5.
I am requesting tokens from an ADFS 2.0 for caching and looking at the DisplayToken. Maybe this can help you get started.
Here is what I can up with:
public SecurityToken GetToken(out RequestSecurityTokenResponse rstr)
{
Console.WriteLine("Connecting to STS...");
WSTrustChannelFactory factory = null;
try
{
if (_useCredentials)
{
// use a UserName Trust Binding for username authentication
factory =
new WSTrustChannelFactory(
new UserNameWSTrustBinding(SecurityMode.TransportWithMessageCredential),
"https://<adfs>/adfs/services/trust/13/UsernameMixed");
factory.TrustVersion = TrustVersion.WSTrust13;
// Username and Password here...
factory.Credentials.UserName.UserName = "username";
factory.Credentials.UserName.Password = "password";
}
else
{
// Windows authentication over transport security
factory = new WSTrustChannelFactory(
new WindowsWSTrustBinding(SecurityMode.Transport),
"https://<adfs>/adfs/services/trust/13/windowstransport") { TrustVersion = TrustVersion.WSTrust13 };
}
var rst = new RequestSecurityToken
{
RequestType = RequestTypes.Issue,
AppliesTo = SvcEndpoint,
KeyType = KeyTypes.Symmetric,
RequestDisplayToken = true
};
Console.WriteLine("Creating channel for STS...");
IWSTrustChannelContract channel = factory.CreateChannel();
Console.WriteLine("Requesting token from " + StsEndpoint.Uri);
SecurityToken token = channel.Issue(rst, out rstr);
Console.WriteLine("Received token from " + StsEndpoint.Uri);
return token;
}
finally
{
if (factory != null)
{
try
{
factory.Close();
}
catch (CommunicationObjectFaultedException)
{
factory.Abort();
}
}
}
}
You might have to acivate the UsernameMixed Endpoint in your ADFS 2.0 if you want to use it and don't forget to restart the service afterwards!
From msdn
To create an STS you must derive from the SecurityTokenService class. In your custom class you must, at a minimum, override the GetScope and GetOutputClaimsIdentity methods.
Not sure how much this will help you, but You're not supposed to create a SecurityTokenService. You are not creating a new token here, and your aplication is not supposed to act as the STS - this is what the AD FS is for.
Your application should only delegate the token received from the AD FS to the service (the concept is described in the link from msdn you provided in your question)
Im guessing theres a good chance the web api will suppor this as well, as its built upon wcf, and from the http point of view - theres no reason it wont support a ws-federation/saml 2 tokens.
EDIT:
This video (starting at 35:00+-) shows a way, i think, to implement what youre looking for, with ws-federation saml token. im guessing its also possible with a saml2 token
I need to dynamically set the endpoint for my Magento implementation using C# but can't override C#'s default check of the endpoint path and credentials in the web.config.
Does anyone know how to do this?
My service currently looks like this:
using (Mage_Api_Model_Server_V2_HandlerPortTypeClient proxy = new Mage_Api_Model_Server_V2_HandlerPortTypeClient("NameOfEndpoint", ConnectionCurrent.WsdlPath))
{
string sessionKey = proxy.startSession();
string loginSession = proxy.login(ConnectionCurrent.UserName, ConnectionCurrent.Password);
...
At Login, it then says that I have two endpoints configured.
I've looked everywhere but can't find a solution.
Thanks!!
This is using WCF but it is similarly done with the older web services implementation:
EndpointAddress endPoint = new EndpointAddress("http://some.endpoint.addr");
Binding binding = new WSHttpBinding(SecurityMode.None);
var service = new Mage_Api_Model_Server_V2_HandlerPortTypeClient(binding, endpoint);