We Keep Coding

Authentication against local AD in the Angular application

I've been developing an Angular app with .NET Core backend (services). The task is to enable an integrated authentication, i.e. make it work with the local user seamlessly, so I login to my (connected to a local AD) machine once and the web application lets me in without the necessity to login a second time. We've been working with Identity Server 4 and intended to implement this scenario using it.
There is a little documentation on the official website concerning the Windows Authentication (e.g. against Active directory): http://docs.identityserver.io/en/latest/topics/windows.html but it doesn't explain much. As per my info, to make this scenario work the browser utilizes either Kerberos or NTLM. Neither of them is mentioned in the IS4 docs. I'm lacking the understanding of how the local credentials are getting picked up and how IS4 'knows' the user belongs to AD? How I can make sure only the users from a specific domain have access to my app?
I found some working stuff here https://github.com/damienbod/AspNetCoreWindowsAuth but questions remain the same. Even though I was able to get to the app with my local account I don't understand the flow.
I expect the user utilizing the app in the local network to log-in to the app without entering the login/password (once he's already logged in to the Windows). Is this something achievable?

Identity Server is intended to serve as an Identity Provider, if you need to talk with your AD you should see the Federation Gateway architecture they propose using the IAuthenticationSchemeProvider. Where Identity Server acts as an endpoint and talks with your AD.
This is the link:
http://docs.identityserver.io/en/latest/topics/federation_gateway.html
You have the control to programmatically reach your AD and pass the correct credentials to get the authentication. That step should be done in your Identity Server. After you get authenticated you should get redirected to your application again.
About your last question, the answer is yes, if you have your website hosted on an intranet and you have the access to your AD, you don't need to capture your credentials as user input, you can programmatically reach the AD as I said.
Bellow is the code I use to connect with my active directory
On the ExternalController class, you get when you use IdentityServer, you have this:(I don't remember at the top of my head how much I changed from the original code, but you should get the idea)
/// <summary>
/// initiate roundtrip to external authentication provider
/// </summary>
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> Challenge(string provider, string returnUrl)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(returnUrl)) returnUrl = "~/";
// validate returnUrl - either it is a valid OIDC URL or back to a local page
if (Url.IsLocalUrl(returnUrl) == false && _interaction.IsValidReturnUrl(returnUrl) == false)
{
// user might have clicked on a malicious link - should be logged
throw new Exception("invalid return URL");
}
if (AccountOptions.WindowsAuthenticationSchemeName == provider)
{
// windows authentication needs special handling
return await ProcessWindowsLoginAsync(returnUrl);
}
else
{
// start challenge and roundtrip the return URL and scheme
var props = new AuthenticationProperties
{
RedirectUri = Url.Action(nameof(Callback)),
Items =
{
{ "returnUrl", returnUrl },
{ "scheme", provider },
}
};
return Challenge(props, provider);
}
}
private async Task<IActionResult> ProcessWindowsLoginAsync(string returnUrl)
{
// see if windows auth has already been requested and succeeded
var result = await HttpContext.AuthenticateAsync(AccountOptions.WindowsAuthenticationSchemeName);
if (result?.Principal is WindowsPrincipal wp)
{
// we will issue the external cookie and then redirect the
// user back to the external callback, in essence, testing windows
// auth the same as any other external authentication mechanism
var props = new AuthenticationProperties()
{
RedirectUri = Url.Action("Callback"),
Items =
{
{ "returnUrl", returnUrl },
{ "scheme", AccountOptions.WindowsAuthenticationSchemeName },
}
};
var id = new ClaimsIdentity(AccountOptions.WindowsAuthenticationSchemeName);
id.AddClaim(new Claim(JwtClaimTypes.Subject, wp.Identity.Name));
id.AddClaim(new Claim(JwtClaimTypes.Name, wp.Identity.Name));
// add the groups as claims -- be careful if the number of groups is too large
if (AccountOptions.IncludeWindowsGroups)
{
var wi = wp.Identity as WindowsIdentity;
var groups = wi.Groups.Translate(typeof(NTAccount));
var roles = groups.Select(x => new Claim(JwtClaimTypes.Role, x.Value));
id.AddClaims(roles);
}
await HttpContext.SignInAsync(
IdentityServer4.IdentityServerConstants.ExternalCookieAuthenticationScheme,
new ClaimsPrincipal(id),
props);
return Redirect(props.RedirectUri);
}
else
{
// trigger windows auth
// since windows auth don't support the redirect uri,
// this URL is re-triggered when we call challenge
return Challenge(AccountOptions.WindowsAuthenticationSchemeName);
}
}
If you want to use Azure AD, I would recommend you to read this article:
https://damienbod.com/2019/05/17/updating-microsoft-account-logins-in-asp-net-core-with-openid-connect-and-azure-active-directory/

Not sure if it's what you want, but I would use the Active Directory Federation Services to configure an OAuth2 endpoint and obtain the user token in the .Net Core Web App.
Isn't NTLM authentication support limited on non Microsoft browsers?
OAuth2 have the advantage of using only standard technologies.

One way to do it is to have 2 instances of the app deployed.
The first one is configured to use Windows Authentication and the other one uses IS4.
ex:
yoursite.internal.com
yoursite.com
Your local DNS should redirect traffic internally from yoursite.com to yoursite.internal.com
yoursite.internal.com will be the one configured to use AD authentication. You should have a flag in your appsettings.json to indicate if this instance is a AD auth or IS4 auth.
The downside of this solution is that you have to deploy 2 instances

Publishing tweets from C# Windows service using Tweetinvi or similar

I am looking into publishing some service status updates on Twitter using Tweetinvi, which seems like a good library for doing that sort of thing, but I am just starting out looking into this so using it is not set in stone.
However, one thing my research has not yielded yet, is an obvious way to handle Twitter authentication in what is essentially a headless service. I have created an app with Twitter, so I have my consumer key and secret, and I can do the "app only" auth to request user info, get their followers etc., but of course I have no right to publish tweets.
So my ambition is (once this is out of beta) to create a proper twitter account, somehow have the service authenticate towards that account, and then publish status updates from the general service at defined intervals. It is a fairly simple idea.
Of course, I can do something like the PIN based authentication mentioned here:
https://github.com/linvi/tweetinvi/wiki/Authentication
I can run that manually, get the PIN code, and proceed with the workflow. But will this require reauthentication at regular intervals, or will it basically be valid "forever"? I am looking for a way to make this as automatic as possible, and having to redo the auth every x hours is a huge dent in this dream, if not a showstopper.
Of course I will have the password for the twitter account used to publish statuses, but I don't see a way to do a good old fashioned login without manual user intervention - what options do I have?

This behavior is by design. Twitter uses OAuth, which is a protocol with the purpose of allowing a user to authorize an application. This is good for the user because otherwise, you or anyone else can perform actions on their behalf without them knowing.
With that in mind, the only way to do this is to have the user explicitly authorize your app. Here's an example of how to do this with LINQ to Twitter, which I wrote, using ASP.NET MVC. When the user visit's your page, you can have a button that re-directs them to the OAuthController below to the BeginAsync action.
using System;
using System.Configuration;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using LinqToTwitter;
namespace MvcDemo.Controllers
{
public class OAuthController : AsyncController
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
public async Task<ActionResult> BeginAsync()
{
//var auth = new MvcSignInAuthorizer
var auth = new MvcAuthorizer
{
CredentialStore = new SessionStateCredentialStore
{
ConsumerKey = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["consumerKey"],
ConsumerSecret = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["consumerSecret"]
}
};
string twitterCallbackUrl = Request.Url.ToString().Replace("Begin", "Complete");
return await auth.BeginAuthorizationAsync(new Uri(twitterCallbackUrl));
}
public async Task<ActionResult> CompleteAsync()
{
var auth = new MvcAuthorizer
{
CredentialStore = new SessionStateCredentialStore()
};
await auth.CompleteAuthorizeAsync(Request.Url);
// This is how you access credentials after authorization.
// The oauthToken and oauthTokenSecret do not expire.
// You can use the userID to associate the credentials with the user.
// You can save credentials any way you want - database,
// isolated storage, etc. - it's up to you.
// You can retrieve and load all 4 credentials on subsequent
// queries to avoid the need to re-authorize.
// When you've loaded all 4 credentials, LINQ to Twitter will let
// you make queries without re-authorizing.
//
//var credentials = auth.CredentialStore;
//string oauthToken = credentials.OAuthToken;
//string oauthTokenSecret = credentials.OAuthTokenSecret;
//string screenName = credentials.ScreenName;
//ulong userID = credentials.UserID;
//
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Home");
}
}
}
After the user authorizes your application, Twitter redirects them back to the CompleteAsync method. Notice the comments on how to extract values from the auth.CredentialStore. Save those in your DB and then retrieve them in your service to make calls on the user's behalf.
Those credentials don't change, but the user can possibly de-authorize your application at some time in the future - at which time you'll need to get them to authorize again. You can get the entire sample code at the LINQ to Twitter ASP.NET Samples page.

Google Data API Authorization Redirect URI Mismatch

Background
I am wanting to write a small, personal web app in .NET Core 1.1 to interact with YouTube and make some things easier for me to do and I am following the tutorials/samples in Google's YouTube documentation. Sounds simple enough, right? ;)
Authenticating with Google's APIs seems impossible! I have done the following:
Created an account in the Google Developer Console
Created a new project in the Google Developer Console
Created a Web Application OAuth Client ID and added my Web App debug URI to the list of approved redirect URIs
Saved the json file provided after generating the OAuth Client ID to my system
In my application, my debug server url is set (and when my application launches in debug, it's using the url I set which is http://127.0.0.1:60077).
However, when I attempt to authenticate with Google's APIs, I recieve the following error:
That’s an error.
Error: redirect_uri_mismatch
The redirect URI in the request, http://127.0.0.1:63354/authorize/,
does not match the ones authorized for the OAuth client.
Problem
So now, for the problem. The only thing I can find when searching for a solution for this is people that say
just put the redirect URI in your approved redirect URIs
Unfortunately, the issue is that every single time my code attempts to authenticate with Google's APIs, the redirect URI it is using changes (the port changes even though I set a static port in the project's properties). I cannot seem to find a way to get it to use a static port. Any help or information would be awesome!
NOTE: Please don't say things like "why don't you just do it this other way that doesn't answer your question at all".
The code
client_id.json
{
"web": {
"client_id": "[MY_CLIENT_ID]",
"project_id": "[MY_PROJECT_ID]",
"auth_uri": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth",
"token_uri": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token",
"auth_provider_x509_cert_url": "https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/certs",
"client_secret": "[MY_CLIENT_SECRET]",
"redirect_uris": [
"http://127.0.0.1:60077/authorize/"
]
}
}
Method That Is Attempting to Use API
public async Task<IActionResult> Test()
{
string ClientIdPath = #"C:\Path\To\My\client_id.json";
UserCredential credential;
using (var stream = new FileStream(ClientIdPath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read))
{
credential = await GoogleWebAuthorizationBroker.AuthorizeAsync(
GoogleClientSecrets.Load(stream).Secrets,
new[] { YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeReadonly },
"user",
CancellationToken.None,
new FileDataStore(this.GetType().ToString())
);
}
var youtubeService = new YouTubeService(new BaseClientService.Initializer()
{
HttpClientInitializer = credential,
ApplicationName = this.GetType().ToString()
});
var channelsListRequest = youtubeService.Channels.List("contentDetails");
channelsListRequest.Mine = true;
// Retrieve the contentDetails part of the channel resource for the authenticated user's channel.
var channelsListResponse = await channelsListRequest.ExecuteAsync();
return Ok(channelsListResponse);
}
Project Properties

The Original Answer works, but it is NOT the best way to do this for an ASP.NET Web Application. See the update below for a better way to handle the flow for an ASP.NET Web Application.
Original Answer
So, I figured this out. The issue is that Google thinks of a web app as a JavaScript based web application and NOT a web app with server side processing. Thus, you CANNOT create a Web Application OAuth Client ID in the Google Developer Console for a server based web application.
The solution is to select the type Other when creating an OAuth Client ID in the Google Developer Console. This will have Google treat it as an installed application and NOT a JavaScript application, thus not requiring a redirect URI to handle the callback.
It's somewhat confusing as Google's documentation for .NET tells you to create a Web App OAuth Client ID.
Feb 16, 2018 Updated Better Answer:
I wanted to provide an update to this answer. Though, what I said above works, this is NOT the best way to implement the OAuth workflow for a ASP.NET solution. There is a better way which actually uses a proper OAuth 2.0 flow. Google's documentation is terrible in regards to this (especially for .NET), so I'll provide a simple implementation example here. The sample is using ASP.NET core, but it's easily adapted to the full .NET framework :)
Note: Google does have a Google.Apis.Auth.MVC package to help simplifiy this OAuth 2.0 flow, but unfortunately it's coupled to a specific MVC implementation and does not work for ASP.NET Core or Web API. So, I wouldn't use it. The example I'll be giving will work for ALL ASP.NET applications. This same code flow can be used for any of the Google APIs you've enabled as it's dependent on the scopes you are requesting.
Also, I am assuming you have your application set up in your Google Developer dashboard. That is to say that you have created an application, enabled the necessary YouTube APIs, created a Web Application Client, and set your allowed redirect urls properly.
The flow will work like this:
The user clicks a button (e.g. Add YouTube)
The View calls a method on the Controller to obtain an Authorization URL
On the controller method, we ask Google to give us an Authorization URL based on our client credentials (the ones created in the Google Developer Dashboard) and provide Google with a Redirect URL for our application (this Redirect URL must be in your list of accepted Redirect URLs for your Google Application)
Google gives us back an Authorization URL
We redirect the user to that Authorization URL
User grants our application access
Google gives our application back a special access code using the Redirect URL we provided Google on the request
We use that access code to get the Oauth tokens for the user
We save the Oauth tokens for the user
You need the following NuGet Packages
Google.Apis
Google.Apis.Auth
Google.Apis.Core
Google.apis.YouTube.v3
The Model
public class ExampleModel
{
public bool UserHasYoutubeToken { get; set; }
}
The Controller
public class ExampleController : Controller
{
// I'm assuming you have some sort of service that can read users from and update users to your database
private IUserService userService;
public ExampleController(IUserService userService)
{
this.userService = userService;
}
public async Task<IActionResult> Index()
{
var userId = // Get your user's ID however you get it
// I'm assuming you have some way of knowing if a user has an access token for YouTube or not
var userHasToken = this.userService.UserHasYoutubeToken(userId);
var model = new ExampleModel { UserHasYoutubeToken = userHasToken }
return View(model);
}
// This is a method we'll use to obtain the authorization code flow
private AuthorizationCodeFlow GetGoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow(params string[] scopes)
{
var clientIdPath = #"C:\Path\To\My\client_id.json";
using (var fileStream = new FileStream(clientIdPath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read))
{
var clientSecrets = GoogleClientSecrets.Load(stream).Secrets;
var initializer = new GoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow.Initializer { ClientSecrets = clientSecrets, Scopes = scopes };
var googleAuthorizationCodeFlow = new GoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow(initializer);
return googleAuthorizationCodeFlow;
}
}
// This is a route that your View will call (we'll call it using JQuery)
[HttpPost]
public async Task<string> GetAuthorizationUrl()
{
// First, we need to build a redirect url that Google will use to redirect back to the application after the user grants access
var protocol = Request.IsHttps ? "https" : "http";
var redirectUrl = $"{protocol}://{Request.Host}/{Url.Action(nameof(this.GetYoutubeAuthenticationToken)).TrimStart('/')}";
// Next, let's define the scopes we'll be accessing. We are requesting YouTubeForceSsl so we can manage a user's YouTube account.
var scopes = new[] { YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeForceSsl };
// Now, let's grab the AuthorizationCodeFlow that will generate a unique authorization URL to redirect our user to
var googleAuthorizationCodeFlow = this.GetGoogleAuthorizationCodeFlow(scopes);
var codeRequestUrl = googleAuthorizationCodeFlow.CreateAuthorizationCodeRequest(redirectUrl);
codeRequestUrl.ResponseType = "code";
// Build the url
var authorizationUrl = codeRequestUrl.Build();
// Give it back to our caller for the redirect
return authorizationUrl;
}
public async Task<IActionResult> GetYoutubeAuthenticationToken([FromQuery] string code)
{
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(code))
{
/*
This means the user canceled and did not grant us access. In this case, there will be a query parameter
on the request URL called 'error' that will have the error message. You can handle this case however.
Here, we'll just not do anything, but you should write code to handle this case however your application
needs to.
*/
}
// The userId is the ID of the user as it relates to YOUR application (NOT their Youtube Id).
// This is the User ID that you assigned them whenever they signed up or however you uniquely identify people using your application
var userId = // Get your user's ID however you do (whether it's on a claim or you have it stored in session or somewhere else)
// We need to build the same redirect url again. Google uses this for validaiton I think...? Not sure what it's used for
// at this stage, I just know we need it :)
var protocol = Request.IsHttps ? "https" : "http";
var redirectUrl = $"{protocol}://{Request.Host}/{Url.Action(nameof(this.GetYoutubeAuthenticationToken)).TrimStart('/')}";
// Now, let's ask Youtube for our OAuth token that will let us do awesome things for the user
var scopes = new[] { YouTubeService.Scope.YoutubeForceSsl };
var googleAuthorizationCodeFlow = this.GetYoutubeAuthorizationCodeFlow(scopes);
var token = await googleAuthorizationCodeFlow.ExchangeCodeForTokenAsync(userId, code, redirectUrl, CancellationToken.None);
// Now, you need to store this token in rlation to your user. So, however you save your user data, just make sure you
// save the token for your user. This is the token you'll use to build up the UserCredentials needed to act on behalf
// of the user.
var tokenJson = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(token);
await this.userService.SaveUserToken(userId, tokenJson);
// Now that we've got access to the user's YouTube account, let's get back
// to our application :)
return RedirectToAction(nameof(this.Index));
}
}
The View
#using YourApplication.Controllers
#model YourApplication.Models.ExampleModel
<div>
#if(Model.UserHasYoutubeToken)
{
<p>YAY! We have access to your YouTube account!</p>
}
else
{
<button id="addYoutube">Add YouTube</button>
}
</div>
<script>
$(document).ready(function () {
var addYoutubeUrl = '#Url.Action(nameof(ExampleController.GetAuthorizationUrl))';
// When the user clicks the 'Add YouTube' button, we'll call the server
// to get the Authorization URL Google built for us, then redirect the
// user to it.
$('#addYoutube').click(function () {
$.post(addYoutubeUrl, function (result) {
if (result) {
window.location.href = result;
}
});
});
});
</script>

As referred here, you need to specify a fix port for the ASP.NET development server like How to fix a port number in asp.NET development server and add this url with the fix port to the allowed urls. Also as stated in this thread, when your browser redirects the user to Google's oAuth page, you should be passing as a parameter the redirect URI you want Google's server to return to with the token response.

I noticed that there is easy non-programmatic way around.
If you have typical monotlith application built in typical MS convention(so not compatible with 12factor and typical DDD) there is an option to tell your Proxy WWW server to rewrite all requests from HTTP to HTTPS so even if you have set up Web App on http://localhost:5000 and then added in Google API url like: http://your.domain.net/sigin-google, it will work perfectly and it is not that bas because it is much safer to set up main WWW to rewrite all to HTTPS.
It is not very good practice I guess however it makes sense and does the job.

I've struggled with this issue for hours in a .net Core application. What finally fixed it for me was, in the Google developers console, to create and use a credential for "Desktop app" instead of a "Web application".

Yeah!! Using credentials of desktop app instead of web app worked for me fine. It took me more than 2 days to figure out this problem. The main problem is that google auth library dose not adding or supporting http://localhost:8000 as redirect uri for web app creds but credentials of desktop app fixed that issue. Cause its supporting http://___ connection instead of https: connection for redirect uri

Differences between AcquireTokenAsync and LoginAsync in Xamarin Native

TL;DR
What is the difference between authenticating users with AuthenticationContext.AcquireTokenAsync() and MobileServiceClient.LoginAsync() ?
Can I use the token from the first method to authenticate a user in the second?
Long Version
I've been trying to authenticate users via a mobile device (iOS) for a mobile service in Azure with Xamarin Native (not Forms).
There are enough tutorials online to get you started but in the process, I got lost and confused...
What's working at the moment is the following; which has the user enter his credentials in another page and returns a JWT token which (if decoded here1) has the claims listed here2.
Moreover, this token is authorized in controllers with the [Authorize] attribute in requests with an Authorization header and a Bearer token.
Note: the following constants are taken from the registered applications in Active Directory (Native and Web App / API).
public const string Authority = #"https://login.windows.net/******.com";
public const string GraphResource = #"https://*******.azurewebsites.net/********";
public const string ClientId = "046b****-****-****-****-********0290";
public const string Resource = #"https://******.azurewebsites.net/.auth/login/done";
var authContext = new AuthenticationContext(Authority);
if (authContext.TokenCache.ReadItems().Any(c => c.Authority == Authority))
{
authContext = new AuthenticationContext(authContext.TokenCache.ReadItems().First().Authority);
}
var uri = new Uri(Resource);
var platformParams = new PlatformParameters(UIApplication.SharedApplication.KeyWindow.RootViewController);
AuthenticationResult authResult = await authContext.AcquireTokenAsync(GraphResource, ClientId, uri, platformParams);
Another working authentication flow I tried is the following; which does the same with the difference that it informs the user that the app requires permissions to access some resources.
If allowed, a JWT token (with less characters than the previous one) is returned with less payload data. This token though, won't pass the authorization attribute just like the previous one.
public const string AadResource = #"https://******.azurewebsites.net/.auth/aad";
var client = new MobileServiceClient(AadResource);
var rootView = UIApplication.SharedApplication.KeyWindow.RootViewController;
MobileServiceUser user = await client.LoginAsync(rootView, "aad");
Obviously, the return type is different, but, what is the main difference between these two authentication methods?
Additionally, another headache comes from trying to achieve this3 at the very end of the article. I already have the token from the first aforementioned method but when I try to follow the client flow with the token in client.LoginAsync() the following error is returned:
The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
Link References:
https://jwt.io/
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/active-directory-token-and-claims
https://adrianhall.github.io/develop-mobile-apps-with-csharp-and-azure/chapter2/enterprise/
https://www.reddit.com/r/xamarindevelopers/comments/6dw928/differences_between_acquiretokenasync/
Edit (30 May 2017)
The Why are they different? has been answered on this4 reddit post by the same person (pdx mobilist / saltydogdev) and the simple answer is claims.

Yes. You can insert a token into the MobileServicesClient and then use it had been authenticated directly. That's the beauty of bearer tokens.
Just set the MobileServiceClient CurrentUser:
MobileServiceclient Client;
...
Client.CurrentUser = new MobileServiceUser(username)
{ MobileServiceAuthenticationToken = authtoken};
Edit:
The reason they are different is because each library is requesting a different set of claims. The reason they still work is that the basic information for authenticating/validating the token is there. I'm not sure what are the specific required claims. At a minimum it would be the user id AND that the signature is valid. They are doing the same basic thing, MobileServiceClient just requests less claims.
I believe that the MobileServicesClient can authenticate against Azure AD, if you set up the mobile service correctly. So you should be able to just use the MobileServiceClient.
Here is the document that describes how this works: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service-mobile/app-service-mobile-how-to-configure-active-directory-authentication

Console app utilizing Facebook offline_access extended permissions and Facebook C# SDK

I'm a refugee from the old Facebook Developer Toolkit porting my app to the newer Facebook C# SDK. I've got the MVC web app side of my solution worked out, but I also have a console application that I run in batch as part of my overall solution. I obtain the offline_access extended permission for all of my users and store the non-expiring session key for later use in my console app.
With the Facebook Developer Toolkit I was able to spin up a Connect Session and REST api using my API Key, API Secret, and the saved user session key and make Facebook api calls.
In the Facebook C# SDK the non-web samples seem to rely on popping up some kind of browser control for interactive user login. That won't work for a console batch application processing users offline.
I've got this far:
string oAuthAccessToken = "{access token}"
var app = new Facebook.FacebookApp(oAuthAccessToken );
// now I can make api calls like this:
dynamic currentPermissionsJson = new ExpandoObject();
currentPermissionsJson = app.Query(string.Format("SELECT publish_stream, offline_access, email from permissions where uid = {0}", {userid}));
var currentPermissions = ((JsonArray)currentPermissionsJson)[0] as IDictionary<string, object>;
and away we go.
I'm just stuck on how to convert my existing stored session keys to Facebook OAuth access tokens. I can see how I can construct POSTs to https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/exchange_sessions with params such as
client_id={my app id}
&client_secret={my app secret}
&sessions={previously stored session keys}
and get the access token back in the response.
But I'm thinking the SDK must offer some method of doing this for me. Or does it?

Unfortunately, we dont have any helpers in the current Facebook C# SDK to exchange the access tokens. I have created an issue and I will try to get it in there shortly. http://facebooksdk.codeplex.com/workitem/5788
For now I wrote up this. Give it a try and let me know how it works:
public class FacebookOAuth
{
public static IEnumerable<ExchangeSessionResult> ExchangeSessions(string appId, string appSecret, params string[] sessionKeys)
{
WebClient client = new WebClient();
var dict = new Dictionary<string, object>();
dict.Add("client_id", appId);
dict.Add("client_secret", appSecret);
dict.Add("sessions", String.Join(",", sessionKeys));
string data = dict.ToJsonQueryString();
string result = client.UploadString("https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/exchange_sessions", data);
return Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<ExchangeSessionResult[]>(result);
}
}
public class ExchangeSessionResult
{
[Newtonsoft.Json.JsonProperty("access_token")]
public string AccessToken { get; set; }
[Newtonsoft.Json.JsonProperty("expires")]
public string Expires { get; set; }
}