We Keep Coding

How to Link two IDs from different classes in MVC5 to display certain information

I am trying to link up the RestaurantId in the RestaurantReservationEventsTbl with the RestaurantID in the RestaurantTbl to display reservations that are only made for the currently logged in restaurant.
I am receiving the following error in my code operator == cannot be applied to operands of type int and iqueryable int
Here is what I am doing in my home controller
var RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl = from r in db.Restaurants select r.RestaurantID;
//var listOfRestaurantsReservations = db.RestaurantReservationEvents.ToList();
var listOfRestaurantsReservations = db.RestaurantReservationEvents.Where(x => x.RestaurantID == RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl).ToList();
//return View(restaurants.Where(x => x.RestaurantEmailAddress == UserEmail).ToList());
//create partial view called _RestaurantReservation
return PartialView("_RestaurantReservations", listOfRestaurantsReservations);

You have to change your code to materialize the restaurantIds like this:
var RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl = (from r in db.Restaurants
select r.RestaurantID).ToList();
Then you may change the code as below for the comparison to work:
var listOfRestaurantsReservations = db.RestaurantReservationEvents.Where(x => RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl.Contains(x.RestaurantID)).ToList();
Anyway this is not the best solution. I will write another example for you, just try this example if it is working or not and let me know for the result.
I would considering changing the code as below to be much more efficient:
var listOfRestaurantsReservations = (from r in db.Restaurants
join e in db.RestaurantReservationEvents
on r.RestaurantID equals e.RestaurantID
//where r.RestaurantID == something //if where condition needed
select e).ToList();
If your tables are not connected with foreignkeys please consider to read this documentation here to make a better structure of the tables since they are related to each-other.
If your tables are related as in documentation article you might have something like that:
var RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl = db.Restaurants.SingleOrDefault(x => x.RestaurantID == something);
if(RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl != null)
{
var listOfRestaurantsReservations = RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl.RestaurantReservationEvents.ToList();
}

{
// This will give you a list of IDs
var RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl = db.Restaurants
.Select(p => p.RestaurantID)
.ToList();
// Using .Any() is a better choice instead of .Contains()
// .Contains is used to check if a list contains an item while .Any will look for an item in a list with a specific ID
var listOfRestaurantsReservations = db.RestaurantReservationEvents
.Where(p => RestaurantIDRestaurantTbl.Any(r => r.pRestaurantID == p))
.ToList();
}

Join 2 table using lambda and updating model

var list = oSIM.Issues.Join(db.IssueTracker_Read,
c => c.IssueId,
o => o.issueid,
(c, o) => new
{
c.read = o.issueid==null?false:true;
});
This is some pseudo code that doesn't work but should convey my requirement.
Entity of Issues is of type Issue which has many fields. I want to update Issue.Read to true if there is a linked record in IssueTracker_Read record.
The returned collection should be list but with list[x].read to be updated based on a linked record.

You can try something like this:
var list = oSIM.Issues.GroupJoin(db.IssueTracker_Read,
c => c.IssueId,
o => o.issueid,
(c, o) => new
{
Issue = c,
IssueRead = o.DefaultIfEmpty()
}).Select(groupJoinInfo=> new {
groupJoinInfo.Issue,
Read = groupJoinInfo.IssueRead != null && groupJoinInfo.IssueRead.Any()
});
And then you can iterate through the returned collection and update the Issues with the new Read property from the anonymous object.
GroupJoin performs an left join between the tables.
Edit
Added missing new, thanks user2520306.
Edit 2
Added a new condition for the Read property, this should return correctly.

Linq - EntityFramework NotSupportedException

I have a query that looks like this:
var caseList = (from x in context.Cases
where allowedCaseIds.Contains(x => x.CaseId)
select new Case {
CaseId = x.CaseId,
NotifierId = x.NotifierId,
Notifier = x.NotifierId.HasValue ? new Notifier { Name = x.Notifier.Name } : null // This line throws exception
}).ToList();
A Case class can have 0..1 Notifier
The query above will result in the following System.NotSupportedException:
Unable to create a null constant value of type 'Models.Notifier'. Only entity types, enumeration types or primitive types are supported
in this context.
At the moment the only workaround I found is to loop the query result afterwards and manually populate Notifierlike this:
foreach (var c in caseList.Where(x => x.NotifierId.HasValue)
{
c.Notifier = (from x in context.Notifiers
where x.CaseId == c.CaseId
select new Notifier {
Name = x.Name
}).FirstOrDefault();
}
But I really don't want to do this because in my actual scenario it would generate hundreds of additional queries.
Is there any possible solution for a situation like this?.

I think you need to do that in two steps. First you can fetch only the data what you need with an anonymous type in a single query:
var caseList = (from x in context.Cases
where allowedCaseIds.Contains(x => x.CaseId)
select new {
CaseId = x.CaseId,
NotifierId = x.NotifierId,
NotifierName = x.Notifier.Name
}).ToList();
After that, you can work in memory:
List<Case> cases = new List<Case>();
foreach (var c in caseList)
{
var case = new Case();
case.CaseId = c.CaseId;
case.NotifierId = c.NotifierId;
case.NotifierName = c.NotifierId.HasValue ? c.NotifierName : null;
cases.Add(case);
}

You could try writing your query as a chain of function calls rather than a query expression, then put an .AsEnumerable() in between:
var caseList = context.Clases
.Where(x => allowedCaseIds.Contains(x.CaseId))
.AsEnumerable() // Switch context
.Select(x => new Case() {
CaseId = x.CaseId,
NotifierId = x.NotifierId,
Notifier = x.NotifierId.HasValue
? new Notifier() { Name = x.Notifier.Name }
: null
})
.ToList();
This will cause EF to generate an SQL query only up to the point where you put the .AsEnumerable(), further down the road, LINQ to Objects will do all the work. This has the advantage that you can use code that cannot be translated to SQL and should not require a lot of changes to your existing code base (unless you're using a lot of let expressions...)

The LINQ expression contains references to queries that are associated with different contexts

Here's my code:
var myStrings = (from x in db1.MyStrings.Where(x => homeStrings.Contains(x.Content))
join y in db2.MyStaticStringTranslations on x.Id equals y.id
select new MyStringModel()
{
Id = x.Id,
Original = x.Content,
Translation = y.translation
}).ToList();
And I get the error that the specified LINQ expression contains references to queries that are associated with different contexts. I know that the problem is that I try to access tables from both db1 and db2, but how do I fix this?

MyStrings is a small table
Load filtered MyStrings in memory, then join with MyStaticStringTranslations using LINQ:
// Read the small table into memory, and make a dictionary from it.
// The last step will use this dictionary for joining.
var byId = db1.MyStrings
.Where(x => homeStrings.Contains(x.Content))
.ToDictionary(s => s.Id);
// Extract the keys. We will need them to filter the big table
var ids = byId.Keys.ToList();
// Bring in only the relevant records
var myStrings = db2.MyStaticStringTranslations
.Where(y => ids.Contains(y.id))
.AsEnumerable() // Make sure the joining is done in memory
.Select(y => new {
Id = y.id
// Use y.id to look up the content from the dictionary
, Original = byId[y.id].Content
, Translation = y.translation
});

You are right that db1 and db2 can't be used in the same Linq expression. x and y have to be joined in this process and not by a Linq provider. Try this:
var x = db1.MyStrings.Where(xx => homeStrings.Contains(xx.Content)).ToEnumerable();
var y = db2.MyStaticStringTranslations.ToEnumerable();
var myStrings = (from a in x
join b in y on x.Id equals y.id
select new MyStringModel()
{
Id = x.Id,
Original = x.Content,
Translation = y.translation
}).ToList();
Refer to this answer for more details: The specified LINQ expression contains references to queries that are associated with different contexts
dasblinkenlight's answer has a better overall approach than this. In this answer I'm trying to minimize the diff against your original code.

I also faced the same problem:
"The specified LINQ expression contains references to queries that are associated with different contexts."
This is because it's not able to connect to two context at a time so i find the solution as below.
Here in this example I want to list the lottery cards with the owner name but the Table having the owner name is in another Database.So I made two context DB1Context and DB2Context.and write the code as follows:
var query = from lc in db1.LotteryCardMaster
from om in db2.OwnerMaster
where lc.IsActive == 1
select new
{
lc.CashCardID,
lc.CashCardNO,
om.PersonnelName,
lc.Status
};
AB.LottryList = new List<LotteryCardMaster>();
foreach (var result in query)
{
AB.LottryList.Add(new LotteryCardMaster()
{
CashCardID = result.CashCardID,
CashCardNO = result.CashCardNO,
PersonnelName =result.PersonnelName,
Status = result.Status
});
}
but this gives me the above error so i found the other way to perform joining on two tables from diffrent database.and that way is as below.
var query = from lc in db1.LotteryCardMaster
where lc.IsActive == 1
select new
{
lc.CashCardID,
lc.CashCardNO,
om.PersonnelName,
lc.Status
};
AB.LottryList = new List<LotteryCardMaster>();
foreach (var result in query)
{
AB.LottryList.Add(new LotteryCardMaster()
{
CashCardID = result.CashCardID,
CashCardNO = result.CashCardNO,
PersonnelName =db2.OwnerMaster.FirstOrDefault(x=>x.OwnerID== result.OwnerID).OwnerName,
Status = result.Status
});
}

Nested query in entity framework

I am getting the following exception:
The nested query is not supported. Operation1='Case' Operation2='Collect'
with this query
var Games = context.Games.Select(a => new GameModel
{
Members = (a.Type == 1 ? (a.UsersInGames.Where(b => b.GameID == a.ID && b.StatusID == 1).Select(c => new Member
{
ID = c.UserID,
email = c.UserInfo.EmailAddress,
screenName = c.UserInfo.ScreenName
})) :
(a.Teams.Where(b => b.GameID == a.ID).SelectMany(b => b.UsersInTeams.Where(c => c.StatusID == 1)).Select(d => new Member
{
ID = d.UserID,
email = d.UserInfo.EmailAddress,
screenName = d.UserInfo.ScreenName
)))
})
when I don't include the condition in selecting Members, the query works fine. Is there a way I can do the conditional inside the query?

You're overestimating the power of LINQ translation to SQL. Not everything is translatable and there is no compiler warning for that due to the way LINQ works.
Nested collections are usually either a) not supported or b) end up in horrible SELECT N+1 queries. What you ask EF to do is to return an object tree. SQL does not support tree like results so you run into the object-relational impedance mismatch and it hurts.
I advise you to fetch the nested collection data as a second, completely separate query. That allows you more control and is guaranteed to work.
As a non-essential side-note, you will probably not be able to convince EF to use the ?: operator over sequences. That is very hard to translate. Think how you would write this as SQL - very hard and convoluted.

It looks like Linq to EF doesn't support the following
context.Games.Select(g => new
{
Field = g.IsX? queryable1 : queryable2
});
But, here's a hack you can use to get it to work:
context.Games.Select(g => new
{
Field = queryable1.Where(q => g.IsX)
.Concat(queryable2.Where(q => !g.IsX))
});

I faced the same problem. The solution was to load both results and determine what to use after the query (I know it has performance downside), but at least you can do it temporarily if deadline attacks you:
At the LINQ side
var Games = context.Games.Select(a => new GameModel
{
// carries type1 results
Members = a.UsersInGames.Where(b => b.GameID == a.ID && b.StatusID == 1).Select(c => new Member
{
ID = c.UserID,
email = c.UserInfo.EmailAddress,
screenName = c.UserInfo.ScreenName
})),
//You need to create this temporary carrier to carry type 2 results
MembersOfType2 = a.Teams.Where(b => b.GameID == a.ID).SelectMany(b => b.UsersInTeams.Where(c => c.StatusID == 1)).Select(d => new Member
{
ID = d.UserID,
email = d.UserInfo.EmailAddress,
screenName = d.UserInfo.ScreenName
})))
})
}
After that you may loop Gamesand make the assignment Members = MembersOfType2 if Type == 1 for a certain game.

I had this error too. I had code like this:
var Games = context.Games.Select(a => new GameModel
{
Members = (!filters.GetDatailedDataToo ? null : new List<MemberModel>())
};
This error occurs when null is used in ? : operation.
This is not that case, written up here, but I've wasted lot of time, I think anyone uses this case, who searches this error text..