Related
I have two forms, one is the main form and the other is an options form. So say for example that the user clicks on my menu on the main form: Tools -> Options, this would cause my options form to be shown.
My question is how can I send data from my options form back to my main form? I know I could use properties, but I have a lot of options and this seems like an tedious odd thing to do.
So what is the best way?
Form1 triggers Form2 to open. Form2 has overloaded constructor which takes calling form as argument and provides its reference to Form2 members. This solves the communication problem. For example I've exposed Label Property as public in Form1 which is modified in Form2.
With this approach you can do communication in different ways.
Download Link for Sample Project
//Your Form1
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2(this);
frm.Show();
}
public string LabelText
{
get { return Lbl.Text; }
set { Lbl.Text = value; }
}
}
//Your Form2
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private Form1 mainForm = null;
public Form2(Form callingForm)
{
mainForm = callingForm as Form1;
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Form2_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.mainForm.LabelText = txtMessage.Text;
}
}
(source: ruchitsurati.net)
(source: ruchitsurati.net)
In the comments to the accepted answer, Neeraj Gulia writes:
This leads to tight coupling of the forms Form1 and Form2, I guess instead one should use custom events for such kind of scenarios.
The comment is exactly right. The accepted answer is not bad; for simple programs, and especially for people just learning programming and trying to get basic scenarios to work, it's a very useful example of how a pair of forms can interact.
However, it's true that the coupling that example causes can and should be avoided, and that in the particular example, an event would accomplish the same thing in a general-purpose, decoupled way.
Here's an example, using the accepted answer's code as the baseline:
Form1.cs:
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2();
frm.Button1Click += (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
frm.Show();
}
}
The above code creates a new instance of Form2, and then before showing it, adds an event handler to that form's Button1Click event.
Note that the expression (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message is converted automatically by the compiler to a method that looks something similar to (but definitely not exactly like) this:
private void frm_Message(object s1, EventArgs e1)
{
Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
}
There are actually lots of ways/syntaxes to implement and subscribe the event handler. For example, using an anonymous method as the above, you don't really need to cast the sender parameter; instead you can just use the frm local variable directly: (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = frm.Message.
Going the other way, you don't need to use an anonymous method. You could in fact just declare a regular method just like the compiler-generated one I show above, and then subscribe that method to the event: frm.Button1Click += frm_Message; (where you have of course used the name frm_Message for the method, just as in my example above).
Regardless of how you do it, of course you will need for Form2 to actually implement that Button1Click event. That's very simple…
Form2.cs:
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler Button1Click;
public string Message { get { return txtMessage.Text; } }
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
In addition to the event, I've also declared a property Message that exposes the Text property (and only the Text property, and only as read-only in fact) of the txtMessage control. This allows the subscriber to the event to get the value and do whatever it needs to with it.
Note that all that the event does is to alert the subscriber that the button has in fact been clicked. It's up to the subscriber to decide how to interpret or react to that event (e.g. by retrieving the value of the Message property and assigning it to something).
Alternatively, you could in fact deliver the text along with the event itself, by declaring a new EventArgs sub-class and using that for the event instead:
public class MessageEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Message { get; private set; }
public MessageEventArgs(string message)
{
Message = message;
}
}
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler<MessageEventArgs> Button1Click;
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new MessageEventArgs(txtMessage.Text));
}
}
}
Then the subscriber can just retrieve the message value directly from the event object:
frm.Button1Click += (sender, e) => Lbl.Text = e.Message;
The important thing note in all of the above variations is that at no point does the class Form2 need to know anything about Form1. Having Form1 know about Form2 is unavoidable; after all, that's the object that will create a new Form2 instance and use it. But the relationship can be asymmetrical, with Form2 being usable by any object that needs the features it offers. By exposing the functionality as an event (and optionally with a property), it makes itself useful without limiting its usefulness to only the Form1 class.
The best in this case would be to have some OptionsService class/interface that is accessible via IServiceProvider.
Just add an event when something changes, and the rest of the app can respond to it.
There are lots of ways to perform communication between two Forms.
Some of them have already been explained to you. I am showing you the other way around.
Assuming you have to update some settings from the child form to the parent form. You can make use of these two ways as well :
Using System.Action (Here you simply pass the main forms function as the parameter to the child form like a callback function)
OpenForms Method ( You directly call one of your open forms)
Using System.Action
You can think of it as a callback function passed to the child form.
// -------- IN THE MAIN FORM --------
// CALLING THE CHILD FORM IN YOUR CODE LOOKS LIKE THIS
Options frmOptions = new Options(UpdateSettings);
frmOptions.Show();
// YOUR FUNCTION IN THE MAIN FORM TO BE EXECUTED
public void UpdateSettings(string data)
{
// DO YOUR STUFF HERE
}
// -------- IN THE CHILD FORM --------
Action<string> UpdateSettings = null;
// IN THE CHILD FORMS CONSTRUCTOR
public Options(Action<string> UpdateSettings)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.UpdateSettings = UpdateSettings;
}
private void btnUpdate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// CALLING THE CALLBACK FUNCTION
if (UpdateSettings != null)
UpdateSettings("some data");
}
OpenForms Method
This method is easy (2 lines). But only works with forms that are open.
All you need to do is add these two lines where ever you want to pass some data.
Main frmMain = (Main)Application.OpenForms["Main"];
frmMain.UpdateSettings("Some data");
Properties is one option, shared static class - another option, events - another option...
You might try AutoMapper. Keep your options in a separate class and then use AutoMapper to shuttle the data between the class and the form.
Create a Class and put all your properties inside the class .. Create a Property in the parent class and set it from your child (options) form
You can have a function in Form B like so:
public SettingsResults GetNewSettings()
{
if(this.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.Ok)
{
return new SettingsResult { ... };
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
And you can call it like this:
...
using(var fb = new FormB())
{
var s = fb.GetNewSettings();
...
// Notify other parts of the application that settings have changed.
}
MVC, MVP, MVVM -- slight overkill for someone admittedly saying they want tutorials. Those are theories that have entire courses dedicated to them.
As already posted, passing an object around is probably easiest. If treating a class as an object (interchangeable in this sense) is new, then you may want to spend another 2-4 weeks figuring out properties and constructors and such.
I'm not a C# master by any means, but these concepts need to be pretty concrete if you want to go much further beyond passing values between two forms (also classes/objects in their own right). Not trying to be mean here at all, it just sounds like you're moving from something like VB6 (or any language with globals) to something far more structured.
Eventually, it will click.
This is probably sidestepping your problem a little bit, but my settings dialog uses the Application Settings construct. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k4s6c3a0.aspx
I can't find a good example that's similar to how I do it (which is actually having an actual class+object), but this covers another way of doing it:
Reading default application settings in C#
A form is a class, just like any other class. Add some public variables to your form class and set them when they click the button to close the form (technically they are just hiding it).
A VB.NET example, but you'll get the idea -
In your OptionsForm class:
Public Option1 as String = ""
etc. Set them when they hit the "Ok" button.
So in your main form, when they hit the "options" button - you create your options form:
OptionsForm.ShowDialog()
when it exits, you harvest your option settings from the public variables on the form:
option1 = OptionsForm.Option1
etc.
The best way to deal with communication between containers is to implement an observer class
The observer pattern is a software design pattern in which an object, called the subject, maintains a list of its dependents, called observers, and notifies them automatically of any state changes, usually by calling one of their methods.
(Wikipedia)
the way i do this is creating an Observer class, and inside it write something like this:
1 public delegate void dlFuncToBeImplemented(string signal);
2 public static event dlFuncToBeImplemented OnFuncToBeImplemented;
3 public static void FuncToBeImplemented(string signal)
4 {
5 OnFuncToBeImplemented(signal);
6 }
so basically: the first line says that there would be a function that somebody else will implement
the second line is creating an event that occurs when the delegated function will call
and the third line is the creation of the function that calls the event
so in your UserControl, you should add a function like this:
private void ObserverRegister()//will contain all observer function registration
{
Observer.OnFuncToBeImplemented += Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented;
/*and more observer function registration............*/
}
void Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented(string signal)//the function that will occur when FuncToBeImplemented(signal) will call
{
MessageBox.Show("Signal "+signal+" received!", "Atention!", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Exclamation);
}
and in your Form you should do something like:
public static int signal = 0;
public void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Observer.FuncToBeImplemented(signal);//will call the event in the user control
}
and now, you can register this function to a whole bunch of other controls and containers and they will all get the signal
I hope this would help :)
I have 2 forms and 1 file to upload to youtube. I am accessing them like so from both forms (both of the forms don't interact together)
await new UploadVideo().Run(video);
Now inside my uploadvideo class I am trying to get the percentage uploaded to use in my form
void videosInsertRequest_ResponseReceived(Video video)
{
//core.prog_up.Text = "Video id '{0}' was successfully uploaded." + video.Id;
}
In both of the forms, I have the exact same form controls, so the naming convention is exactly the same. So depending on which form I initiated the uploadvideo class I want the form component to be accessed from the uploadclass.
I have named my forms: Form1 and Form2
I can iniate one by doing :
Form1 frm = new Form1();
But then I can't access Form2 if I initiate it from that form
depedning on which form I initiate tge uploadvideo class I want the form component to be accessed from the uploadclass
No, not really. You only think you do.
Your UploadVideo class should not know anything about the Form classes. It has no need to, and it's exactly your effort to do otherwise that has led you into this trap. Instead, what you want to do is "decouple" your UploadVideo class from the other classes that use it. This avoids these kinds of difficulties and at the same time helps your UploadVideo class remain maximally reusable (you can even use it where there's no Form class involved).
One right way to do this is to implement an event, which each Form class can subscribe to as appropriate:
class UploadVideo
{
public event EventHandler<string> StatusTextChanged;
void videosInsertRequest_ResponseReceived(Video video)
{
StatusTextChanged?.Invoke(this, $"Video id '{video.Id}' was successfully uploaded.");
}
}
NOTE: your original text didn't really make sense. It used a format replacement specifier {0}, but didn't pass that to string.Format(), instead just appending the Id property value to the end of the string. I've changed the text expression to work as one would normally expect it to need to.
If you're not using the latest C# and don't have the "interpolated strings" feature, you can use string.Format("Video id '{0}' was successfully uploaded.", video.Id) instead.
Then a Form class can subscribe:
partial class Form1 : Form
{
async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
UploadVideo uv = new UploadVideo();
uv.StatusTextChanged += (sender, text) =>
{
Invoke((MethodInvoker)(() => label1.Text = text));
}
await uv.Run(video);
}
}
(You didn't offer enough code to know exactly what the expression core.prog_up is really supposed to be, so in the above I've just assumed an arbitrary label1 object that's used to display the text.)
Another alternative is to use the Progress<T> class:
class UploadVideo
{
private readonly IProgress<string> _progress;
public UploadVideo(IProgress<string> progress)
{
_progress = progress;
}
void videosInsertRequest_ResponseReceived(Video video)
{
_progress.Report($"Video id '{video.Id}' was successfully uploaded.");
}
}
and…
partial class Form1 : Form
{
async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Progress<string> progress = new Progress(s => label1.Text = text);
await new UploadVideo(progress).Run(video);
}
}
Note that when using the Progress<T> class, there's no need to add the call to Control.Invoke() to get back on the UI thread, because it handles that automatically for you.
The above shows passing the IProgress<T> instance to the UploadVideo constructor, but you could of course pass it to the Run() method instead. Either way will work. It just depends on where you need to value.
Yet another approach avoids callbacks altogether. Again, your original code example is pretty vague, so it's not clear whether this would apply in your case. But assuming the callback would be handled just before the Run() method returns, and assuming the video object passed to the ResponseReceived event handler is the same one your code passes to the Run() method, then you could just use the completion of the call to the Run() method as the indication to update the UI:
partial class Form1 : Form
{
async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
await new UploadVideo().Run(video);
label1.Text = $"Video id '{video.Id}' was successfully uploaded.";
}
}
This is a particularly compelling approach, because it removes even the string literal from the UploadVideo class, putting it into the class that actually is directly involved in interacting with the user (i.e. the only place where a string value really matters).
If the above is not enough for you to get back headed in the right direction, you'll need to improve your question by editing it so that it includes a good Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable code example showing exactly how your scenario works.
You can use parameters to pass the reference of form.
private Form _frm;
public Form1(Form form)
{
_frm = form;
InitializeComponent();
}
And then you can simply call the form like this:
Form1 frm = new Form1(this)
I have a C# 2.0 application with a form that uses a class that contains a thread.
In the thread function, rather than call the event handler directly, it is invoked. The effect is that the owning form does not need to call InvokeRequired/BeginInvoke to update its controls.
public class Foo
{
private Control owner_;
Thread thread_;
public event EventHandler<EventArgs> FooEvent;
public Foo(Control owner)
{
owner_ = owner;
thread_ = new Thread(FooThread);
thread_.Start();
}
private void FooThread()
{
Thread.Sleep(1000);
for (;;)
{
// Invoke performed in the thread
owner_.Invoke((EventHandler<EventArgs>)InternalFooEvent,
new object[] { this, new EventArgs() });
Thread.Sleep(10);
}
}
private void InternalFooEvent(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler<EventArgs> evt = FooEvent;
if (evt != null)
evt(sender, e);
}
}
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private Foo foo_;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
foo_ = new Foo(this);
foo_.FooEvent += OnFooEvent;
}
private void OnFooEvent(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// does not need to call InvokeRequired/BeginInvoke()
label_.Text = "hello";
}
}
This is obviously contrary to the method used by Microsoft APIs that use background threads like System.Timers.Timer and System.Io.Ports.SerialPort. Is there anything inherently wrong with this method? Is it dangerous in some way?
Thanks,
PaulH
Edit: also, what if the form did not subscribe to the event right away? Would it clog the Form's message queue with events the form wasn't interested in?
This is a threadsafe call, the method will be processed in the thread of the form.
Nothing wrong with it when looking at it from a conceptual perspective.
Timers are more elegant for such tasks, though. However, it could be that a timer with an interval of 10ms slows down the GUI, that's probably why Invoke was used.
You do not need a call to InvokeRequired, since it is clear that the Control is in an other thread. Also, BeginInvoke only needs to be called when you want to call a method asynchronously, which obviously isn't the case here.
Regarding your edit:
No, the message queue will not be clogged. No event will be fired if no handler has been registered. Take another look at your code ;)
How can I call a method on a form from a method called from an external class from a backgroundWorker? I believe that delegates are somehow the answer to this question, but after spending time reading, I still am confused by this problem.
This is in Visual Studio 2008, the backgroundWorker is run from the form and calls ExternalClass.Method. The form is in namespace ProgramName and the ExternalClass is using ProgramName. When i declare public delegate MyDelegate in the namespace ProgramName in the file of my windows.form I can create an instance of MyDelegate and call it in a method of my form (but this does not help me), but if I try to create an instance of MyDelegate and call it from a method of my external class I cannot access the method of the windows.form, even though it is public.
thanks
yes, I want to pass progress reports (int percent, string status) back from ExternalClass.Method. Can you explain a bit more about that CSharpAtl (or anyone)?
Please do yourself a favor and read up on the BackgroundWorker Component, especially "How to: Implement a Form That Uses a Background Operation".
Other resources:
Windows Client Development Portal
Using the BackgroundWorker Control (video)
Windows Forms Videos
The main thing to realize is that you actually have two levels of synchronization going on here: between the Form and the BackgroundWorker, and between the BackgroundWorker and the ExternalClass object.
The Form is asynchronously invoking BackgroundWorker.DoWork(), which is running in another thread. Any updates to the Form should come through Form.Invoke() (which fires an arbitrary delegate in the Form's thread) or, better yet, through the BackgroundWorker.ProgressChanged event (which fires a specific event in the Form's thread).
So what you want to do is proxy the status updates from the ExternalClass method back to the BackgroundWorker, which will in turn push them on to the Form. One way I've done this in the past is to use a callback delegate:
public delegate void ProgressCallback(double percentCompleted, string status);
And have my expensive worker method take the callback as an argument:
public void ExpensiveMethod(ProgressCallback callback) {
while(doingThings) {
if(callback != null) callback(percentDone, statusString);
}
}
Then in your BackgroundWorker class, define a method that matches your callback delegate, and have it call BackgroundWorker.ReportProgress() to trigger the BackgroundWorker.ProgressChanged event, which can in turn update your Form's state.
Update: this is basically the same as the solution Henk Holterman suggested in his new edit.
Note that your question (afaik) is not just about the backgroundwiorker but just as much about how to break a circular reference between classes. This is a standard problem with a standard solution.
You can pass a delegate (referring to a Form-method) around just as any object so also to a Backgroundworker. And the Bgw can pass it to the external method. A delegate includes a reference to the object (in this case the Form).
Note that since you are on another thread you will need to use Control.Invoke inside the delegate, or use the Bgw ReportProgress event.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private void ReportProgresshandler(int percent, string state)
{
backgroundWorker1.ReportProgress(percent); // also does the Invoke
}
private void backgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
var ex = new ExampleClass();
ex.Dowork(ReportProgresshandler);
}
}
and something like
class ExampleClass
{
delegate void ReportDelegate(int percent, string status);
public void Dowork(ReportDelegate report)
{
report(0, "starting");
}
}
I'm not sure what the trouble is. And also you can use a delegate, but don't need one.
using System.Windows.Forms;
using System.ComponentModel;
public partial class ExampleForm : Form
{
public ExampleForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
var worker = new BackgroundWorker();
worker.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(doWork);
worker.RunWorkerAsync(this);
}
void doWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
ExampleForm f = e.Argument as ExampleForm;
f.Hello();
}
private void Hello()
{
}
}
I have two forms, one is the main form and the other is an options form. So say for example that the user clicks on my menu on the main form: Tools -> Options, this would cause my options form to be shown.
My question is how can I send data from my options form back to my main form? I know I could use properties, but I have a lot of options and this seems like an tedious odd thing to do.
So what is the best way?
Form1 triggers Form2 to open. Form2 has overloaded constructor which takes calling form as argument and provides its reference to Form2 members. This solves the communication problem. For example I've exposed Label Property as public in Form1 which is modified in Form2.
With this approach you can do communication in different ways.
Download Link for Sample Project
//Your Form1
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2(this);
frm.Show();
}
public string LabelText
{
get { return Lbl.Text; }
set { Lbl.Text = value; }
}
}
//Your Form2
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private Form1 mainForm = null;
public Form2(Form callingForm)
{
mainForm = callingForm as Form1;
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Form2_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.mainForm.LabelText = txtMessage.Text;
}
}
(source: ruchitsurati.net)
(source: ruchitsurati.net)
In the comments to the accepted answer, Neeraj Gulia writes:
This leads to tight coupling of the forms Form1 and Form2, I guess instead one should use custom events for such kind of scenarios.
The comment is exactly right. The accepted answer is not bad; for simple programs, and especially for people just learning programming and trying to get basic scenarios to work, it's a very useful example of how a pair of forms can interact.
However, it's true that the coupling that example causes can and should be avoided, and that in the particular example, an event would accomplish the same thing in a general-purpose, decoupled way.
Here's an example, using the accepted answer's code as the baseline:
Form1.cs:
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2();
frm.Button1Click += (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
frm.Show();
}
}
The above code creates a new instance of Form2, and then before showing it, adds an event handler to that form's Button1Click event.
Note that the expression (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message is converted automatically by the compiler to a method that looks something similar to (but definitely not exactly like) this:
private void frm_Message(object s1, EventArgs e1)
{
Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
}
There are actually lots of ways/syntaxes to implement and subscribe the event handler. For example, using an anonymous method as the above, you don't really need to cast the sender parameter; instead you can just use the frm local variable directly: (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = frm.Message.
Going the other way, you don't need to use an anonymous method. You could in fact just declare a regular method just like the compiler-generated one I show above, and then subscribe that method to the event: frm.Button1Click += frm_Message; (where you have of course used the name frm_Message for the method, just as in my example above).
Regardless of how you do it, of course you will need for Form2 to actually implement that Button1Click event. That's very simple…
Form2.cs:
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler Button1Click;
public string Message { get { return txtMessage.Text; } }
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
In addition to the event, I've also declared a property Message that exposes the Text property (and only the Text property, and only as read-only in fact) of the txtMessage control. This allows the subscriber to the event to get the value and do whatever it needs to with it.
Note that all that the event does is to alert the subscriber that the button has in fact been clicked. It's up to the subscriber to decide how to interpret or react to that event (e.g. by retrieving the value of the Message property and assigning it to something).
Alternatively, you could in fact deliver the text along with the event itself, by declaring a new EventArgs sub-class and using that for the event instead:
public class MessageEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Message { get; private set; }
public MessageEventArgs(string message)
{
Message = message;
}
}
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler<MessageEventArgs> Button1Click;
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new MessageEventArgs(txtMessage.Text));
}
}
}
Then the subscriber can just retrieve the message value directly from the event object:
frm.Button1Click += (sender, e) => Lbl.Text = e.Message;
The important thing note in all of the above variations is that at no point does the class Form2 need to know anything about Form1. Having Form1 know about Form2 is unavoidable; after all, that's the object that will create a new Form2 instance and use it. But the relationship can be asymmetrical, with Form2 being usable by any object that needs the features it offers. By exposing the functionality as an event (and optionally with a property), it makes itself useful without limiting its usefulness to only the Form1 class.
The best in this case would be to have some OptionsService class/interface that is accessible via IServiceProvider.
Just add an event when something changes, and the rest of the app can respond to it.
There are lots of ways to perform communication between two Forms.
Some of them have already been explained to you. I am showing you the other way around.
Assuming you have to update some settings from the child form to the parent form. You can make use of these two ways as well :
Using System.Action (Here you simply pass the main forms function as the parameter to the child form like a callback function)
OpenForms Method ( You directly call one of your open forms)
Using System.Action
You can think of it as a callback function passed to the child form.
// -------- IN THE MAIN FORM --------
// CALLING THE CHILD FORM IN YOUR CODE LOOKS LIKE THIS
Options frmOptions = new Options(UpdateSettings);
frmOptions.Show();
// YOUR FUNCTION IN THE MAIN FORM TO BE EXECUTED
public void UpdateSettings(string data)
{
// DO YOUR STUFF HERE
}
// -------- IN THE CHILD FORM --------
Action<string> UpdateSettings = null;
// IN THE CHILD FORMS CONSTRUCTOR
public Options(Action<string> UpdateSettings)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.UpdateSettings = UpdateSettings;
}
private void btnUpdate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// CALLING THE CALLBACK FUNCTION
if (UpdateSettings != null)
UpdateSettings("some data");
}
OpenForms Method
This method is easy (2 lines). But only works with forms that are open.
All you need to do is add these two lines where ever you want to pass some data.
Main frmMain = (Main)Application.OpenForms["Main"];
frmMain.UpdateSettings("Some data");
Properties is one option, shared static class - another option, events - another option...
You might try AutoMapper. Keep your options in a separate class and then use AutoMapper to shuttle the data between the class and the form.
Create a Class and put all your properties inside the class .. Create a Property in the parent class and set it from your child (options) form
You can have a function in Form B like so:
public SettingsResults GetNewSettings()
{
if(this.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.Ok)
{
return new SettingsResult { ... };
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
And you can call it like this:
...
using(var fb = new FormB())
{
var s = fb.GetNewSettings();
...
// Notify other parts of the application that settings have changed.
}
MVC, MVP, MVVM -- slight overkill for someone admittedly saying they want tutorials. Those are theories that have entire courses dedicated to them.
As already posted, passing an object around is probably easiest. If treating a class as an object (interchangeable in this sense) is new, then you may want to spend another 2-4 weeks figuring out properties and constructors and such.
I'm not a C# master by any means, but these concepts need to be pretty concrete if you want to go much further beyond passing values between two forms (also classes/objects in their own right). Not trying to be mean here at all, it just sounds like you're moving from something like VB6 (or any language with globals) to something far more structured.
Eventually, it will click.
This is probably sidestepping your problem a little bit, but my settings dialog uses the Application Settings construct. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k4s6c3a0.aspx
I can't find a good example that's similar to how I do it (which is actually having an actual class+object), but this covers another way of doing it:
Reading default application settings in C#
A form is a class, just like any other class. Add some public variables to your form class and set them when they click the button to close the form (technically they are just hiding it).
A VB.NET example, but you'll get the idea -
In your OptionsForm class:
Public Option1 as String = ""
etc. Set them when they hit the "Ok" button.
So in your main form, when they hit the "options" button - you create your options form:
OptionsForm.ShowDialog()
when it exits, you harvest your option settings from the public variables on the form:
option1 = OptionsForm.Option1
etc.
The best way to deal with communication between containers is to implement an observer class
The observer pattern is a software design pattern in which an object, called the subject, maintains a list of its dependents, called observers, and notifies them automatically of any state changes, usually by calling one of their methods.
(Wikipedia)
the way i do this is creating an Observer class, and inside it write something like this:
1 public delegate void dlFuncToBeImplemented(string signal);
2 public static event dlFuncToBeImplemented OnFuncToBeImplemented;
3 public static void FuncToBeImplemented(string signal)
4 {
5 OnFuncToBeImplemented(signal);
6 }
so basically: the first line says that there would be a function that somebody else will implement
the second line is creating an event that occurs when the delegated function will call
and the third line is the creation of the function that calls the event
so in your UserControl, you should add a function like this:
private void ObserverRegister()//will contain all observer function registration
{
Observer.OnFuncToBeImplemented += Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented;
/*and more observer function registration............*/
}
void Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented(string signal)//the function that will occur when FuncToBeImplemented(signal) will call
{
MessageBox.Show("Signal "+signal+" received!", "Atention!", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Exclamation);
}
and in your Form you should do something like:
public static int signal = 0;
public void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Observer.FuncToBeImplemented(signal);//will call the event in the user control
}
and now, you can register this function to a whole bunch of other controls and containers and they will all get the signal
I hope this would help :)