We Keep Coding

C# Forms: Help in referencing existing class instead of creating new instance every time [duplicate]

I have two forms, one is the main form and the other is an options form. So say for example that the user clicks on my menu on the main form: Tools -> Options, this would cause my options form to be shown.
My question is how can I send data from my options form back to my main form? I know I could use properties, but I have a lot of options and this seems like an tedious odd thing to do.
So what is the best way?

Form1 triggers Form2 to open. Form2 has overloaded constructor which takes calling form as argument and provides its reference to Form2 members. This solves the communication problem. For example I've exposed Label Property as public in Form1 which is modified in Form2.
With this approach you can do communication in different ways.
Download Link for Sample Project
//Your Form1
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2(this);
frm.Show();
}
public string LabelText
{
get { return Lbl.Text; }
set { Lbl.Text = value; }
}
}
//Your Form2
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private Form1 mainForm = null;
public Form2(Form callingForm)
{
mainForm = callingForm as Form1;
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Form2_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.mainForm.LabelText = txtMessage.Text;
}
}
(source: ruchitsurati.net)
(source: ruchitsurati.net)

In the comments to the accepted answer, Neeraj Gulia writes:
This leads to tight coupling of the forms Form1 and Form2, I guess instead one should use custom events for such kind of scenarios.
The comment is exactly right. The accepted answer is not bad; for simple programs, and especially for people just learning programming and trying to get basic scenarios to work, it's a very useful example of how a pair of forms can interact.
However, it's true that the coupling that example causes can and should be avoided, and that in the particular example, an event would accomplish the same thing in a general-purpose, decoupled way.
Here's an example, using the accepted answer's code as the baseline:
Form1.cs:
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2();
frm.Button1Click += (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
frm.Show();
}
}
The above code creates a new instance of Form2, and then before showing it, adds an event handler to that form's Button1Click event.
Note that the expression (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message is converted automatically by the compiler to a method that looks something similar to (but definitely not exactly like) this:
private void frm_Message(object s1, EventArgs e1)
{
Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
}
There are actually lots of ways/syntaxes to implement and subscribe the event handler. For example, using an anonymous method as the above, you don't really need to cast the sender parameter; instead you can just use the frm local variable directly: (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = frm.Message.
Going the other way, you don't need to use an anonymous method. You could in fact just declare a regular method just like the compiler-generated one I show above, and then subscribe that method to the event: frm.Button1Click += frm_Message; (where you have of course used the name frm_Message for the method, just as in my example above).
Regardless of how you do it, of course you will need for Form2 to actually implement that Button1Click event. That's very simple…
Form2.cs:
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler Button1Click;
public string Message { get { return txtMessage.Text; } }
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
In addition to the event, I've also declared a property Message that exposes the Text property (and only the Text property, and only as read-only in fact) of the txtMessage control. This allows the subscriber to the event to get the value and do whatever it needs to with it.
Note that all that the event does is to alert the subscriber that the button has in fact been clicked. It's up to the subscriber to decide how to interpret or react to that event (e.g. by retrieving the value of the Message property and assigning it to something).
Alternatively, you could in fact deliver the text along with the event itself, by declaring a new EventArgs sub-class and using that for the event instead:
public class MessageEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Message { get; private set; }
public MessageEventArgs(string message)
{
Message = message;
}
}
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler<MessageEventArgs> Button1Click;
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new MessageEventArgs(txtMessage.Text));
}
}
}
Then the subscriber can just retrieve the message value directly from the event object:
frm.Button1Click += (sender, e) => Lbl.Text = e.Message;
The important thing note in all of the above variations is that at no point does the class Form2 need to know anything about Form1. Having Form1 know about Form2 is unavoidable; after all, that's the object that will create a new Form2 instance and use it. But the relationship can be asymmetrical, with Form2 being usable by any object that needs the features it offers. By exposing the functionality as an event (and optionally with a property), it makes itself useful without limiting its usefulness to only the Form1 class.

The best in this case would be to have some OptionsService class/interface that is accessible via IServiceProvider.
Just add an event when something changes, and the rest of the app can respond to it.

There are lots of ways to perform communication between two Forms.
Some of them have already been explained to you. I am showing you the other way around.
Assuming you have to update some settings from the child form to the parent form. You can make use of these two ways as well :
Using System.Action (Here you simply pass the main forms function as the parameter to the child form like a callback function)
OpenForms Method ( You directly call one of your open forms)
Using System.Action
You can think of it as a callback function passed to the child form.
// -------- IN THE MAIN FORM --------
// CALLING THE CHILD FORM IN YOUR CODE LOOKS LIKE THIS
Options frmOptions = new Options(UpdateSettings);
frmOptions.Show();
// YOUR FUNCTION IN THE MAIN FORM TO BE EXECUTED
public void UpdateSettings(string data)
{
// DO YOUR STUFF HERE
}
// -------- IN THE CHILD FORM --------
Action<string> UpdateSettings = null;
// IN THE CHILD FORMS CONSTRUCTOR
public Options(Action<string> UpdateSettings)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.UpdateSettings = UpdateSettings;
}
private void btnUpdate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// CALLING THE CALLBACK FUNCTION
if (UpdateSettings != null)
UpdateSettings("some data");
}
OpenForms Method
This method is easy (2 lines). But only works with forms that are open.
All you need to do is add these two lines where ever you want to pass some data.
Main frmMain = (Main)Application.OpenForms["Main"];
frmMain.UpdateSettings("Some data");

Properties is one option, shared static class - another option, events - another option...

You might try AutoMapper. Keep your options in a separate class and then use AutoMapper to shuttle the data between the class and the form.

Create a Class and put all your properties inside the class .. Create a Property in the parent class and set it from your child (options) form

You can have a function in Form B like so:
public SettingsResults GetNewSettings()
{
if(this.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.Ok)
{
return new SettingsResult { ... };
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
And you can call it like this:
...
using(var fb = new FormB())
{
var s = fb.GetNewSettings();
...
// Notify other parts of the application that settings have changed.
}

MVC, MVP, MVVM -- slight overkill for someone admittedly saying they want tutorials. Those are theories that have entire courses dedicated to them.
As already posted, passing an object around is probably easiest. If treating a class as an object (interchangeable in this sense) is new, then you may want to spend another 2-4 weeks figuring out properties and constructors and such.
I'm not a C# master by any means, but these concepts need to be pretty concrete if you want to go much further beyond passing values between two forms (also classes/objects in their own right). Not trying to be mean here at all, it just sounds like you're moving from something like VB6 (or any language with globals) to something far more structured.
Eventually, it will click.

This is probably sidestepping your problem a little bit, but my settings dialog uses the Application Settings construct. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k4s6c3a0.aspx
I can't find a good example that's similar to how I do it (which is actually having an actual class+object), but this covers another way of doing it:
Reading default application settings in C#

A form is a class, just like any other class. Add some public variables to your form class and set them when they click the button to close the form (technically they are just hiding it).
A VB.NET example, but you'll get the idea -
In your OptionsForm class:
Public Option1 as String = ""
etc. Set them when they hit the "Ok" button.
So in your main form, when they hit the "options" button - you create your options form:
OptionsForm.ShowDialog()
when it exits, you harvest your option settings from the public variables on the form:
option1 = OptionsForm.Option1
etc.

The best way to deal with communication between containers is to implement an observer class
The observer pattern is a software design pattern in which an object, called the subject, maintains a list of its dependents, called observers, and notifies them automatically of any state changes, usually by calling one of their methods.
(Wikipedia)
the way i do this is creating an Observer class, and inside it write something like this:
1 public delegate void dlFuncToBeImplemented(string signal);
2 public static event dlFuncToBeImplemented OnFuncToBeImplemented;
3 public static void FuncToBeImplemented(string signal)
4 {
5 OnFuncToBeImplemented(signal);
6 }
so basically: the first line says that there would be a function that somebody else will implement
the second line is creating an event that occurs when the delegated function will call
and the third line is the creation of the function that calls the event
so in your UserControl, you should add a function like this:
private void ObserverRegister()//will contain all observer function registration
{
Observer.OnFuncToBeImplemented += Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented;
/*and more observer function registration............*/
}
void Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented(string signal)//the function that will occur when FuncToBeImplemented(signal) will call
{
MessageBox.Show("Signal "+signal+" received!", "Atention!", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Exclamation);
}
and in your Form you should do something like:
public static int signal = 0;
public void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Observer.FuncToBeImplemented(signal);//will call the event in the user control
}
and now, you can register this function to a whole bunch of other controls and containers and they will all get the signal
I hope this would help :)

Accessing form controls from multiple forms

I have 2 forms and 1 file to upload to youtube. I am accessing them like so from both forms (both of the forms don't interact together)
await new UploadVideo().Run(video);
Now inside my uploadvideo class I am trying to get the percentage uploaded to use in my form
void videosInsertRequest_ResponseReceived(Video video)
{
//core.prog_up.Text = "Video id '{0}' was successfully uploaded." + video.Id;
}
In both of the forms, I have the exact same form controls, so the naming convention is exactly the same. So depending on which form I initiated the uploadvideo class I want the form component to be accessed from the uploadclass.
I have named my forms: Form1 and Form2
I can iniate one by doing :
Form1 frm = new Form1();
But then I can't access Form2 if I initiate it from that form

depedning on which form I initiate tge uploadvideo class I want the form component to be accessed from the uploadclass
No, not really. You only think you do.
Your UploadVideo class should not know anything about the Form classes. It has no need to, and it's exactly your effort to do otherwise that has led you into this trap. Instead, what you want to do is "decouple" your UploadVideo class from the other classes that use it. This avoids these kinds of difficulties and at the same time helps your UploadVideo class remain maximally reusable (you can even use it where there's no Form class involved).
One right way to do this is to implement an event, which each Form class can subscribe to as appropriate:
class UploadVideo
{
public event EventHandler<string> StatusTextChanged;
void videosInsertRequest_ResponseReceived(Video video)
{
StatusTextChanged?.Invoke(this, $"Video id '{video.Id}' was successfully uploaded.");
}
}
NOTE: your original text didn't really make sense. It used a format replacement specifier {0}, but didn't pass that to string.Format(), instead just appending the Id property value to the end of the string. I've changed the text expression to work as one would normally expect it to need to.
If you're not using the latest C# and don't have the "interpolated strings" feature, you can use string.Format("Video id '{0}' was successfully uploaded.", video.Id) instead.
Then a Form class can subscribe:
partial class Form1 : Form
{
async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
UploadVideo uv = new UploadVideo();
uv.StatusTextChanged += (sender, text) =>
{
Invoke((MethodInvoker)(() => label1.Text = text));
}
await uv.Run(video);
}
}
(You didn't offer enough code to know exactly what the expression core.prog_up is really supposed to be, so in the above I've just assumed an arbitrary label1 object that's used to display the text.)
Another alternative is to use the Progress<T> class:
class UploadVideo
{
private readonly IProgress<string> _progress;
public UploadVideo(IProgress<string> progress)
{
_progress = progress;
}
void videosInsertRequest_ResponseReceived(Video video)
{
_progress.Report($"Video id '{video.Id}' was successfully uploaded.");
}
}
and…
partial class Form1 : Form
{
async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Progress<string> progress = new Progress(s => label1.Text = text);
await new UploadVideo(progress).Run(video);
}
}
Note that when using the Progress<T> class, there's no need to add the call to Control.Invoke() to get back on the UI thread, because it handles that automatically for you.
The above shows passing the IProgress<T> instance to the UploadVideo constructor, but you could of course pass it to the Run() method instead. Either way will work. It just depends on where you need to value.
Yet another approach avoids callbacks altogether. Again, your original code example is pretty vague, so it's not clear whether this would apply in your case. But assuming the callback would be handled just before the Run() method returns, and assuming the video object passed to the ResponseReceived event handler is the same one your code passes to the Run() method, then you could just use the completion of the call to the Run() method as the indication to update the UI:
partial class Form1 : Form
{
async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
await new UploadVideo().Run(video);
label1.Text = $"Video id '{video.Id}' was successfully uploaded.";
}
}
This is a particularly compelling approach, because it removes even the string literal from the UploadVideo class, putting it into the class that actually is directly involved in interacting with the user (i.e. the only place where a string value really matters).
If the above is not enough for you to get back headed in the right direction, you'll need to improve your question by editing it so that it includes a good Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable code example showing exactly how your scenario works.

You can use parameters to pass the reference of form.
private Form _frm;
public Form1(Form form)
{
_frm = form;
InitializeComponent();
}
And then you can simply call the form like this:
Form1 frm = new Form1(this)

Delegates to Pass Data Between Windows C# WPF

I am attempting to use Delegates to pass data between two Windows. I want a list of People to appear when the user clicks a button on the main Window, this will then allow the user to select a Person. After doing this it will fill in a TextBox on the original form with the Person name.
I started off much simpler than this however to get my head around Delegates and I'm having issues understanding how to call methods on separate Windows with the Delegates. This is what I have attempted so far;
The method on the main Window that waits for a string (ShowMessage);
public static DelegateTestWindow.TestDelegate ShowDelegateMessage(string message)
{
MessageBox.Show(message);
return null;
}
The second Window that contains the Delegate;
public partial class DelegateTestWindow : Window
{
public delegate string TestDelegate();
public DelegateTestWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void TestDelegateClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var tDelegate = new TestDelegate(CompanyManagement.ShowDelegateMessage("Test"));
this.Close();
}
}
This does show a message saying "Test" however it also throws an Exception after doing so: Delegate to an instance method cannot have null 'this'.
The method on the MainWindow especially does not look correct to me, however after trying different options this is the closest I've got to a working Delegate. Could someone explain where I have (clearly) gone wrong here and how I can improve the system I've got now?

Like Mat linked, events are a special kind of delegate, which is probably what you are looking for.
I've written a small example, hopefully this is enough for you to resolve your issue.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public event EventHandler PersonSelected;
public String PersonName { get; set; }
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
PersonName = "Person's name";
}
protected override void OnClick(EventArgs e)
{
Form2 form2 = new Form2(this);
form2.Show();
PersonSelected(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public Form2(Form1 form)
{
InitializeComponent();
form.PersonSelected += (sender, args) =>
{
Form1 form1 = sender as Form1;
if(form1 != null)
textBox1.Text = form1.PersonName;
};
}
}
Now, this can be done differently, and better than this, however I think this should suffice. When you get this to work, I recommend you look into another way of doing this. Typically you will create a PersonEventArgs class which inherits from EventArgs. This class then holds a reference to the person. Here is a decent link with an example:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.eventargs(v=vs.110).aspx
Good luck :)

Passing directory structure to another form [duplicate]

I have two forms, one is the main form and the other is an options form. So say for example that the user clicks on my menu on the main form: Tools -> Options, this would cause my options form to be shown.
My question is how can I send data from my options form back to my main form? I know I could use properties, but I have a lot of options and this seems like an tedious odd thing to do.
So what is the best way?

Form1 triggers Form2 to open. Form2 has overloaded constructor which takes calling form as argument and provides its reference to Form2 members. This solves the communication problem. For example I've exposed Label Property as public in Form1 which is modified in Form2.
With this approach you can do communication in different ways.
Download Link for Sample Project
//Your Form1
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2(this);
frm.Show();
}
public string LabelText
{
get { return Lbl.Text; }
set { Lbl.Text = value; }
}
}
//Your Form2
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private Form1 mainForm = null;
public Form2(Form callingForm)
{
mainForm = callingForm as Form1;
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Form2_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.mainForm.LabelText = txtMessage.Text;
}
}
(source: ruchitsurati.net)
(source: ruchitsurati.net)

In the comments to the accepted answer, Neeraj Gulia writes:
This leads to tight coupling of the forms Form1 and Form2, I guess instead one should use custom events for such kind of scenarios.
The comment is exactly right. The accepted answer is not bad; for simple programs, and especially for people just learning programming and trying to get basic scenarios to work, it's a very useful example of how a pair of forms can interact.
However, it's true that the coupling that example causes can and should be avoided, and that in the particular example, an event would accomplish the same thing in a general-purpose, decoupled way.
Here's an example, using the accepted answer's code as the baseline:
Form1.cs:
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form2 frm = new Form2();
frm.Button1Click += (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
frm.Show();
}
}
The above code creates a new instance of Form2, and then before showing it, adds an event handler to that form's Button1Click event.
Note that the expression (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message is converted automatically by the compiler to a method that looks something similar to (but definitely not exactly like) this:
private void frm_Message(object s1, EventArgs e1)
{
Lbl.Text = ((Form2)s1).Message;
}
There are actually lots of ways/syntaxes to implement and subscribe the event handler. For example, using an anonymous method as the above, you don't really need to cast the sender parameter; instead you can just use the frm local variable directly: (s1, e1) => Lbl.Text = frm.Message.
Going the other way, you don't need to use an anonymous method. You could in fact just declare a regular method just like the compiler-generated one I show above, and then subscribe that method to the event: frm.Button1Click += frm_Message; (where you have of course used the name frm_Message for the method, just as in my example above).
Regardless of how you do it, of course you will need for Form2 to actually implement that Button1Click event. That's very simple…
Form2.cs:
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler Button1Click;
public string Message { get { return txtMessage.Text; } }
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
In addition to the event, I've also declared a property Message that exposes the Text property (and only the Text property, and only as read-only in fact) of the txtMessage control. This allows the subscriber to the event to get the value and do whatever it needs to with it.
Note that all that the event does is to alert the subscriber that the button has in fact been clicked. It's up to the subscriber to decide how to interpret or react to that event (e.g. by retrieving the value of the Message property and assigning it to something).
Alternatively, you could in fact deliver the text along with the event itself, by declaring a new EventArgs sub-class and using that for the event instead:
public class MessageEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Message { get; private set; }
public MessageEventArgs(string message)
{
Message = message;
}
}
public partial class Form2 : Form
{
public event EventHandler<MessageEventArgs> Button1Click;
public Form2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EventHandler handler = Button1Click;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new MessageEventArgs(txtMessage.Text));
}
}
}
Then the subscriber can just retrieve the message value directly from the event object:
frm.Button1Click += (sender, e) => Lbl.Text = e.Message;
The important thing note in all of the above variations is that at no point does the class Form2 need to know anything about Form1. Having Form1 know about Form2 is unavoidable; after all, that's the object that will create a new Form2 instance and use it. But the relationship can be asymmetrical, with Form2 being usable by any object that needs the features it offers. By exposing the functionality as an event (and optionally with a property), it makes itself useful without limiting its usefulness to only the Form1 class.

The best in this case would be to have some OptionsService class/interface that is accessible via IServiceProvider.
Just add an event when something changes, and the rest of the app can respond to it.

There are lots of ways to perform communication between two Forms.
Some of them have already been explained to you. I am showing you the other way around.
Assuming you have to update some settings from the child form to the parent form. You can make use of these two ways as well :
Using System.Action (Here you simply pass the main forms function as the parameter to the child form like a callback function)
OpenForms Method ( You directly call one of your open forms)
Using System.Action
You can think of it as a callback function passed to the child form.
// -------- IN THE MAIN FORM --------
// CALLING THE CHILD FORM IN YOUR CODE LOOKS LIKE THIS
Options frmOptions = new Options(UpdateSettings);
frmOptions.Show();
// YOUR FUNCTION IN THE MAIN FORM TO BE EXECUTED
public void UpdateSettings(string data)
{
// DO YOUR STUFF HERE
}
// -------- IN THE CHILD FORM --------
Action<string> UpdateSettings = null;
// IN THE CHILD FORMS CONSTRUCTOR
public Options(Action<string> UpdateSettings)
{
InitializeComponent();
this.UpdateSettings = UpdateSettings;
}
private void btnUpdate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// CALLING THE CALLBACK FUNCTION
if (UpdateSettings != null)
UpdateSettings("some data");
}
OpenForms Method
This method is easy (2 lines). But only works with forms that are open.
All you need to do is add these two lines where ever you want to pass some data.
Main frmMain = (Main)Application.OpenForms["Main"];
frmMain.UpdateSettings("Some data");

Properties is one option, shared static class - another option, events - another option...

You might try AutoMapper. Keep your options in a separate class and then use AutoMapper to shuttle the data between the class and the form.

Create a Class and put all your properties inside the class .. Create a Property in the parent class and set it from your child (options) form

You can have a function in Form B like so:
public SettingsResults GetNewSettings()
{
if(this.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.Ok)
{
return new SettingsResult { ... };
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
And you can call it like this:
...
using(var fb = new FormB())
{
var s = fb.GetNewSettings();
...
// Notify other parts of the application that settings have changed.
}

MVC, MVP, MVVM -- slight overkill for someone admittedly saying they want tutorials. Those are theories that have entire courses dedicated to them.
As already posted, passing an object around is probably easiest. If treating a class as an object (interchangeable in this sense) is new, then you may want to spend another 2-4 weeks figuring out properties and constructors and such.
I'm not a C# master by any means, but these concepts need to be pretty concrete if you want to go much further beyond passing values between two forms (also classes/objects in their own right). Not trying to be mean here at all, it just sounds like you're moving from something like VB6 (or any language with globals) to something far more structured.
Eventually, it will click.

This is probably sidestepping your problem a little bit, but my settings dialog uses the Application Settings construct. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k4s6c3a0.aspx
I can't find a good example that's similar to how I do it (which is actually having an actual class+object), but this covers another way of doing it:
Reading default application settings in C#

A form is a class, just like any other class. Add some public variables to your form class and set them when they click the button to close the form (technically they are just hiding it).
A VB.NET example, but you'll get the idea -
In your OptionsForm class:
Public Option1 as String = ""
etc. Set them when they hit the "Ok" button.
So in your main form, when they hit the "options" button - you create your options form:
OptionsForm.ShowDialog()
when it exits, you harvest your option settings from the public variables on the form:
option1 = OptionsForm.Option1
etc.

The best way to deal with communication between containers is to implement an observer class
The observer pattern is a software design pattern in which an object, called the subject, maintains a list of its dependents, called observers, and notifies them automatically of any state changes, usually by calling one of their methods.
(Wikipedia)
the way i do this is creating an Observer class, and inside it write something like this:
1 public delegate void dlFuncToBeImplemented(string signal);
2 public static event dlFuncToBeImplemented OnFuncToBeImplemented;
3 public static void FuncToBeImplemented(string signal)
4 {
5 OnFuncToBeImplemented(signal);
6 }
so basically: the first line says that there would be a function that somebody else will implement
the second line is creating an event that occurs when the delegated function will call
and the third line is the creation of the function that calls the event
so in your UserControl, you should add a function like this:
private void ObserverRegister()//will contain all observer function registration
{
Observer.OnFuncToBeImplemented += Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented;
/*and more observer function registration............*/
}
void Observer_OnFuncToBeImplemented(string signal)//the function that will occur when FuncToBeImplemented(signal) will call
{
MessageBox.Show("Signal "+signal+" received!", "Atention!", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Exclamation);
}
and in your Form you should do something like:
public static int signal = 0;
public void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Observer.FuncToBeImplemented(signal);//will call the event in the user control
}
and now, you can register this function to a whole bunch of other controls and containers and they will all get the signal
I hope this would help :)

How to get a method on a main form to get executed on the main form whenever i do some action on a secondary form?

I'm trying to update my data on a main form whenever I change some option in a secondary form.
Possible solution:
Make the method public on Form1 (the main form) like this:
public void updatedata()
{
//data update
}
And then call it on the secondary form:
Form1.updatedata()
This doesn't work and I believe it's because he is trying to update the Form2
I'm using partial classes, but I'm not very well versed on them.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
And the secondary one:
public partial class formOpConfig : Form
{
private Form1 Opener { get; set; }
public formOpConfig(Form1 opener)
{ //initialize component
}
}

I feel like surely there is a duplicate question to match this one. But I have been unable to find it.
Given the code you posted, your attempt probably would have worked had you used Opener.updatedata() instead of Form1.updatedata(). But that still would not have been the best solution.
Commenter John Saunders is correct, the right way to do this is to declare an event in formOpConfig, and then have Form1 subscribe to it. That looks more like this:
public partial class formOpConfig : Form
{
public event EventHandler UpdateData;
private void SomethingHappens()
{
// do stuff...
OnUpdateData();
// maybe do other stuff too...
}
private void OnUpdateData()
{
EventHandler handler = UpdateData;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
}
The above declares an event, and raises that event (invokes the handlers) at the appropriate time (i.e. when SomethingHappens()).
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private void OpenConfigForm()
{
OpenConfigForm opConfig = new formOpConfig();
opConfig.UpdateData += (sender, e) => updatedata();
}
// Note that this method is private...no one else should need to call it
private void updatedata()
{
//data update
}
}
Here, Form1 subscribes to the event when it creates the instance of formOpConfig (I am assuming Form1 is what creates that instance), and when its handler is invoked, it calls the updatedata() method you've already written.
In this way, the two classes remain decoupled; i.e. they are not actually dependent on each other, more than they need to be (in particular, the formOpConfig class doesn't need to know anything about Form1).

A good way to do this is to use an Event.
This allows you to decouple the forms because they do not even need a reference to each other; basically an event is a way for your second form to tell whoever might be listening (without having to exactly know who) that something of interest happened, and to give them some information about that interesting event that they can use.
The linked article will give you much more detail than the below, which is just a quick idea of how to do it; I would recommend working through the tutorial!
The mechanism by which this occurs is that anyone who wants to know about interesting events on Form2 has to subscribe to the corresponding event on Form2; then whenever Form2 wants to tell its listeners that something has happened, it invokes any event handlers that have been attached to the event.
Because an event can have multiple handlers, it's a really excellent way to keep components in your application decoupled.
Quick demo
(note: code below is off top of head so not tested, no error handling, etc.)
First of all, you need to declare a class that can be used to send the interesting data to listening parties. This class has to inherit from System.EventArgs
public class InterestingEventArgs:EventArgs
{
public string AnInterestingFact {get;private set;}
public InterestingEventArgs(string fact)
{
AnInterestingFact =fact;
}
}
It doesn't matter where you declare this as long as it's visible to both Form1 and Form2.
Next, you have to declare an event on Form2, it needs to be public and should look like this:
public event EventHandler<InterestingEventArgs> SomethingInterestingHappened;
Now you need to decide when you are going to tell interested parties about this event. Let's suppose you have a button on Form2 and you want to raise the event when you click it. So in the Click handler for the button, you might have code like this:
public void btnRaiseEvent_Clicked(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var fact= txtFact.Text;
var handler = SomethingInterestingHappened;
if (handler!=null)
{
handler(this,new InterestingEventArgs(fact));
}
}
and finally here is how the code might look from Form1 when you are launching Form2, let's say you click a button on Form1 to launch Form2:
public void btnShowForm2_Clicked(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var child = new Form2();
child.SomethingInterestingHappened+=OnSomethingInterestingHappened;
child.Show();
}
Finally you need to write an event handler on Form1 that will be called when the event is raised:
void OnSomethingInterestingHappened(object sender, InterestingEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show("Did you know? " + e.AnInterestingFact);
}

It looks like you have passed in a reference to a Form1 object in the constructor. Use it:
public partial class formOpConfig : Form
{
private Form1 Opener { get; set; }
public formOpConfig(Form1 opener)
{
Opener = opener;
}
private void updateForm1()
{
Opener.updatedata();
}
}
Form1 is a class, not an object. You can say Form1.updatedata() if you make updatedata() a static method of the Form1 class, but that is probably not compatible with the rest of your code.