Related
Consider we have this class :
public class Data
{
public string Field1 { get; set; }
public string Field2 { get; set; }
public string Field3 { get; set; }
public string Field4 { get; set; }
public string Field5 { get; set; }
}
How do I dynamically select for specify columns ? something like this :
var list = new List<Data>();
var result= list.Select("Field1,Field2"); // How ?
Is this the only solution => Dynamic LINQ ?
Selected fields are not known at compile time. They would be specified at runtime
You can do this by dynamically creating the lambda you pass to Select:
Func<Data,Data> CreateNewStatement( string fields )
{
// input parameter "o"
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter( typeof( Data ), "o" );
// new statement "new Data()"
var xNew = Expression.New( typeof( Data ) );
// create initializers
var bindings = fields.Split( ',' ).Select( o => o.Trim() )
.Select( o => {
// property "Field1"
var mi = typeof( Data ).GetProperty( o );
// original value "o.Field1"
var xOriginal = Expression.Property( xParameter, mi );
// set value "Field1 = o.Field1"
return Expression.Bind( mi, xOriginal );
}
);
// initialization "new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit( xNew, bindings );
// expression "o => new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Data,Data>>( xInit, xParameter );
// compile to Func<Data, Data>
return lambda.Compile();
}
Then you can use it like this:
var result = list.Select( CreateNewStatement( "Field1, Field2" ) );
In addition for Nicholas Butler and the hint in comment of Matt(that use T for type of input class), I put an improve to Nicholas answer that generate the property of entity dynamically and the function does not need to send field as parameter.
For Use add class as below:
public static class Helpers
{
public static Func<T, T> DynamicSelectGenerator<T>(string Fields = "")
{
string[] EntityFields;
if (Fields == "")
// get Properties of the T
EntityFields = typeof(T).GetProperties().Select(propertyInfo => propertyInfo.Name).ToArray();
else
EntityFields = Fields.Split(',');
// input parameter "o"
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "o");
// new statement "new Data()"
var xNew = Expression.New(typeof(T));
// create initializers
var bindings = EntityFields.Select(o => o.Trim())
.Select(o =>
{
// property "Field1"
var mi = typeof(T).GetProperty(o);
// original value "o.Field1"
var xOriginal = Expression.Property(xParameter, mi);
// set value "Field1 = o.Field1"
return Expression.Bind(mi, xOriginal);
}
);
// initialization "new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit(xNew, bindings);
// expression "o => new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, T>>(xInit, xParameter);
// compile to Func<Data, Data>
return lambda.Compile();
}
}
The DynamicSelectGenerator method get entity with type T, this method have optional input parameter Fields that if you want to select special field from entity send as a string such as "Field1, Field2" and if you don't send anything to method, it returns all of the fields of entity, you could use this method as below:
using (AppDbContext db = new AppDbContext())
{
//select "Field1, Field2" from entity
var result = db.SampleEntity.Select(Helpers.DynamicSelectGenerator<SampleEntity>("Field1, Field2")).ToList();
//select all field from entity
var result1 = db.SampleEntity.Select(Helpers.DynamicSelectGenerator<SampleEntity>()).ToList();
}
(Assume that you have a DbContext with name AppDbContext and the context have an entity with name SampleEntity)
You must use reflection to get and set property value with it's name.
var result = new List<Data>();
var data = new Data();
var type = data.GetType();
var fieldName = "Something";
for (var i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
{
foreach (var property in data.GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (property.Name == fieldName)
{
type.GetProperties().FirstOrDefault(n => n.Name == property.Name).SetValue(data, GetPropValue(list[i], property.Name), null);
result.Add(data);
}
}
}
And here is GetPropValue() method
public static object GetPropValue(object src, string propName)
{
return src.GetType().GetProperty(propName).GetValue(src, null);
}
Using Reflection and Expression bulid can do what you say.
Example:
var list = new List<Data>();
//bulid a expression tree to create a paramter
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Data), "d");
//bulid expression tree:data.Field1
Expression selector = Expression.Property(param,typeof(Data).GetProperty("Field1"));
Expression pred = Expression.Lambda(selector, param);
//bulid expression tree:Select(d=>d.Field1)
Expression expr = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), "Select",
new Type[] { typeof(Data), typeof(string) },
Expression.Constant(list.AsQueryable()), pred);
//create dynamic query
IQueryable<string> query = list.AsQueryable().Provider.CreateQuery<string>(expr);
var result=query.ToList();
I writing the method in following line for you can work with nested fields taking advantage of Nicholas Butler and Ali.
You can use this method for dynamically creating to lambda for pass to select and also works for nested fields. You can also work with IQueryable cases.
/// <param name="Fields">
/// Format1: "Field1"
/// Format2: "Nested1.Field1"
/// Format3: "Field1:Field1Alias"
/// </param>
public static Expression<Func<T, TSelect>> DynamicSelectGenerator<T, TSelect>(params string[] Fields)
{
string[] EntityFields = Fields;
if (Fields == null || Fields.Length == 0)
// get Properties of the T
EntityFields = typeof(T).GetProperties().Select(propertyInfo => propertyInfo.Name).ToArray();
// input parameter "x"
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "x");
// new statement "new Data()"
var xNew = Expression.New(typeof(TSelect));
// create initializers
var bindings = EntityFields
.Select(x =>
{
string[] xFieldAlias = x.Split(":");
string field = xFieldAlias[0];
string[] fieldSplit = field.Split(".");
if (fieldSplit.Length > 1)
{
// original value "x.Nested.Field1"
Expression exp = xParameter;
foreach (string item in fieldSplit)
exp = Expression.PropertyOrField(exp, item);
// property "Field1"
PropertyInfo member2 = null;
if (xFieldAlias.Length > 1)
member2 = typeof(TSelect).GetProperty(xFieldAlias[1]);
else
member2 = typeof(T).GetProperty(fieldSplit[fieldSplit.Length - 1]);
// set value "Field1 = x.Nested.Field1"
var res = Expression.Bind(member2, exp);
return res;
}
// property "Field1"
var mi = typeof(T).GetProperty(field);
PropertyInfo member;
if (xFieldAlias.Length > 1)
member = typeof(TSelect).GetProperty(xFieldAlias[1]);
else member = typeof(TSelect).GetProperty(field);
// original value "x.Field1"
var xOriginal = Expression.Property(xParameter, mi);
// set value "Field1 = x.Field1"
return Expression.Bind(member, xOriginal);
}
);
// initialization "new Data { Field1 = x.Field1, Field2 = x.Field2 }"
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit(xNew, bindings);
// expression "x => new Data { Field1 = x.Field1, Field2 = x.Field2 }"
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, TSelect>>(xInit, xParameter);
return lambda;
}
Usage:
var s = DynamicSelectGenerator<SalesTeam, SalesTeamSelect>(
"Name:SalesTeamName",
"Employee.FullName:SalesTeamExpert"
);
var res = _context.SalesTeam.Select(s);
public class SalesTeam
{
public string Name {get; set; }
public Guid EmployeeId { get; set; }
public Employee Employee { get; set; }
}
public class SalesTeamSelect
{
public string SalesTeamName {get; set; }
public string SalesTeamExpert {get; set; }
}
The OP mentioned Dynamic Linq library, so I'd like to lay out an explanation on its usage.
1. Dynamic Linq Built-In Select
Dynamic Linq has a built-in Select method, which can be used as follows:
var numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
var wrapped = numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num }).ToList();
// the "it" keyword functions as the lambda parameter,
// so essentialy it's like calling: numbers.Select(num => num)
var selectedNumbers = numbers.Select("it");
// the following is the equivalent of calling: wrapped.Select(num => num.Value)
var selectedValues = wrapped.Select("Value");
// the following is the equivalent of calling: numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num })
var selectedObjects = numbers.Select("new(it as Value)");
foreach (int num in selectedNumbers) Console.WriteLine(num);
foreach (int val in selectedValues) Console.WriteLine(val);
foreach (dynamic obj in selectedObjects) Console.WriteLine(obj.Value);
The Downside
There's somewhat a downside using the built-in Select:
Since it's an IQueryable - not IQueryable<T> - extension method, with IQueryable as its return type, common materialization methods - like ToList or FirstOrDefault - can't be used. This is why the above example uses foreach - it's simply the only convenient way of materializing the results.
So to make things more convenient, let's support these methods.
2. Supporting Select<T> in Dynamic Linq (to enable using ToList and alike)
To support Select<T>, it needs to be added into the Dynamic Linq file. The simple steps for doing that are explained in this answer and in my comment on it.
After doing so, it can be used in the following way:
var numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
var wrapped = numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num }).ToList();
// the following is the equivalent of calling: numbers.Select(num => num).ToList()
var selectedNumbers = numbers.Select<int>("it").ToList();
// the following is the equivalent of calling: wrapped.Select(num => num.Value).ToList()
var selectedValues = wrapped.Select<int>("Value").ToList();
// the following is the equivalent of calling: numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num }).ToList()
var selectedObjects = numbers.Select<object>("new(it as Value)").ToList();
The Downside
Arguably, this implementation introduces yet another kind of downside: By having to explicitly parameterize the Select<T> call (e.g., having to call Select<int>), we're losing the dynamic nature of the library.
Nevertheless, since we can now call any materialization Linq method, this usage may still be quite useful.
I simplified the amazing method DynamicSelectGenerator() created by Ali and made this extension method that overrides the LINQ Select() to take a column separated parameters to simplify the usage and for more readability:
public static IEnumerable<T> Select<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string parameters)
{
return source.Select(DynamicSelectGenerator<T>(parameters));
}
So instead of:
var query = list.Select(Helpers.DynamicSelectGenerator<Data>("Field1,Field2")).ToList();
Will be:
var query = list.Select("Field1,Field2").ToList();
Another approach I've used is a nested ternary operator:
string col = "Column3";
var query = table.Select(i => col == "Column1" ? i.Column1 :
col == "Column2" ? i.Column2 :
col == "Column3" ? i.Column3 :
col == "Column4" ? i.Column4 :
null);
The ternary operator requires that each field be the same type, so you'll need to call .ToString() on any non-string columns.
I have generate my own class for same purpose of usage.
github gist : https://gist.github.com/mstrYoda/663789375b0df23e2662a53bebaf2c7c
It generates dynamic select lambda for given string and also support for two level nested properties.
Example of usage is :
class Shipment {
// other fields...
public Address Sender;
public Address Recipient;
}
class Address {
public string AddressText;
public string CityName;
public string CityId;
}
// in the service method
var shipmentDtos = _context.Shipments.Where(s => request.ShipmentIdList.Contains(s.Id))
.Select(new SelectLambdaBuilder<Shipment>().CreateNewStatement(request.Fields)) // request.Fields = "Sender.CityName,Sender.CityId"
.ToList();
It compiles the lambda as below:
s => new Shipment {
Sender = new Address {
CityId = s.Sender.CityId,
CityName = s.Sender.CityName
}
}
You can also find my quesion and answer here :c# - Dynamically generate linq select with nested properties
public class SelectLambdaBuilder<T>
{
// as a performence consideration I cached already computed type-properties
private static Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]> _typePropertyInfoMappings = new Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]>();
private readonly Type _typeOfBaseClass = typeof(T);
private Dictionary<string, List<string>> GetFieldMapping(string fields)
{
var selectedFieldsMap = new Dictionary<string, List<string>>();
foreach (var s in fields.Split(','))
{
var nestedFields = s.Split('.').Select(f => f.Trim()).ToArray();
var nestedValue = nestedFields.Length > 1 ? nestedFields[1] : null;
if (selectedFieldsMap.Keys.Any(key => key == nestedFields[0]))
{
selectedFieldsMap[nestedFields[0]].Add(nestedValue);
}
else
{
selectedFieldsMap.Add(nestedFields[0], new List<string> { nestedValue });
}
}
return selectedFieldsMap;
}
public Func<T, T> CreateNewStatement(string fields)
{
ParameterExpression xParameter = Expression.Parameter(_typeOfBaseClass, "s");
NewExpression xNew = Expression.New(_typeOfBaseClass);
var selectFields = GetFieldMapping(fields);
var shpNestedPropertyBindings = new List<MemberAssignment>();
foreach (var keyValuePair in selectFields)
{
PropertyInfo[] propertyInfos;
if (!_typePropertyInfoMappings.TryGetValue(_typeOfBaseClass, out propertyInfos))
{
var properties = _typeOfBaseClass.GetProperties();
propertyInfos = properties;
_typePropertyInfoMappings.Add(_typeOfBaseClass, properties);
}
var propertyType = propertyInfos
.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name.ToLowerInvariant().Equals(keyValuePair.Key.ToLowerInvariant()))
.PropertyType;
if (propertyType.IsClass)
{
PropertyInfo objClassPropInfo = _typeOfBaseClass.GetProperty(keyValuePair.Key);
MemberExpression objNestedMemberExpression = Expression.Property(xParameter, objClassPropInfo);
NewExpression innerObjNew = Expression.New(propertyType);
var nestedBindings = keyValuePair.Value.Select(v =>
{
PropertyInfo nestedObjPropInfo = propertyType.GetProperty(v);
MemberExpression nestedOrigin2 = Expression.Property(objNestedMemberExpression, nestedObjPropInfo);
var binding2 = Expression.Bind(nestedObjPropInfo, nestedOrigin2);
return binding2;
});
MemberInitExpression nestedInit = Expression.MemberInit(innerObjNew, nestedBindings);
shpNestedPropertyBindings.Add(Expression.Bind(objClassPropInfo, nestedInit));
}
else
{
Expression mbr = xParameter;
mbr = Expression.PropertyOrField(mbr, keyValuePair.Key);
PropertyInfo mi = _typeOfBaseClass.GetProperty( ((MemberExpression)mbr).Member.Name );
var xOriginal = Expression.Property(xParameter, mi);
shpNestedPropertyBindings.Add(Expression.Bind(mi, xOriginal));
}
}
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit(xNew, shpNestedPropertyBindings);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T,T>>( xInit, xParameter );
return lambda.Compile();
}
Thank you #morio. Your comment about Expression<Func<T, T>> is exactly what I needed to make this work.
I do not know how to perform an anonymous projection which seems like what most want. I say I want Field1 and Field2 from Data and I get back something like: new { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 };
But I have a need similar to many where I want to plot x and y values, but don't know until run time which ones they are.
So rather than use an anonymous object, I create one that has the properties I want. In this case, X and Y.
Here are the source and target classes:
public class Source
{
public int PropertyA { get; set; }
public double PropertyB { get; set; }
public double PropertyC { get; set; }
}
public class Target
{
public double X { get; set; }
public double Y { get; set; }
}
And here is the code that does the mapping between the Source and the Target.
public static class SelectBuilder
{
/// <summary>
/// Creates a Func that can be used in a Linq Select statement that will map from the source items to a new target type.
/// Typical usage pattern is that you have an Entity that has many properties, but you want to dynamically set properties
/// on a smaller target type, AND, you don't know the mapping at compile time.
/// For example, you have an Entity that has a year and 10 properties. You want to have time (year) as the X axis, but
/// the user can chose any of the 10 properties to plot on the y axis. This would allow you to map one of the entity
/// properties to the Y value dynamically.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TSource">Type of the source, for example, and Entity Framework entity.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TTarget">Type of the target, a projection of a smaller number of properties than the entity has.</typeparam>
/// <param name="propertyMappings">A list of named tuples that map the sourceProperty to the targetProperty.</param>
/// <returns>A func that can be used inside the Select.
/// So if
/// var select = SelectBuilder.GetSelectStatement<Source, Target>(propertyMappings), then
/// you can perform the select,
/// var results = items.Select(select);</returns>
public static Expression<Func<TSource, TTarget>> GetSelectStatement<TSource, TTarget>(IEnumerable<(string sourceProperty, string targetProperty)> propertyMappings)
{
// Get the source parameter, "source". This will allow the statement to be "X = source.SourceA".
// It needs to be of the source type, and the name is what will be used in the Select lambda.
var sourceParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "source");
// Now define the ability to create a new Target type.
var newTarget = Expression.New(typeof(TTarget));
// Now develop the bindings or member assignments for each property.
var bindings = new List<MemberAssignment>();
foreach (var propertyMapping in propertyMappings)
{
var sourceMemberInfo = typeof(TSource).GetProperty(propertyMapping.sourceProperty);
var targetMemberInfo = typeof(TTarget).GetProperty(propertyMapping.targetProperty);
// This allows getting the value. Source parameter will provide the "source" part and sourceMemberInfo the property name.
// For example, "source.SourceA".
var sourceValue = Expression.Property(sourceParameter, sourceMemberInfo);
// Provide conversion in the event there is not a perfect match for the type.
// For example, if SourceA is int and the target X is double?, we need to convert from int to double?
var convertExpression = Expression.Convert(sourceValue, targetMemberInfo.PropertyType);
// Put together the target assignment, "X = Convert(source.SourcA, double?)" (TODO: How does the convert actually happen?)
var targetAssignment = Expression.Bind(targetMemberInfo, convertExpression);
bindings.Add(targetAssignment);
}
var memberInit = Expression.MemberInit(newTarget, bindings);
// Here if we map SourceA to X and SourceB to Y the lambda will be:
// {source => new Target() {X = Convert(source.SourceA, Nullable`1), Y = Convert(source.SourceB, Nullable`1)}}
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, TTarget>>(memberInit, sourceParameter);
return lambda;//.Compile();
}
}
And finally a unit test that works.
[Fact(DisplayName = "GetSelectStatement works")]
public void Test2()
{
// Arrange
var source = new Source { PropertyA = 1, PropertyB = 2, PropertyC = 3 };
var expectedX = Convert.ToDouble(source.PropertyA);
var expectedY = Convert.ToDouble(source.PropertyB);
var items = new List<Source> { source }.AsQueryable();
// Let's map SourceA to X and SourceB to Y.
var propertyMappings = new List<(string sourceProperty, string targetProperty)>
{
("PropertyA", "X"), ("PropertyB", "Y")
//(nameof(Source.PropertyA), nameof(Target.X)),
//(nameof(Source.PropertyB), nameof(Target.Y))
};
// Act
var select = SelectBuilder.GetSelectStatement<Source, Target>(propertyMappings);
var actual = items.Select(select).First();
// Assert
actual.X.Should().Be(expectedX);
actual.Y.Should().Be(expectedY);
}
I've edited my previous answer since now I know how to convert from int to double. I've also made the unit test easier to understand.
I hope this helps others.
Using ExpandoObject you can build a dynamic objects or return the full object from the example below.
public object CreateShappedObject(object obj, List<string> lstFields)
{
if (!lstFields.Any())
{
return obj;
}
else
{
ExpandoObject objectToReturn = new ExpandoObject();
foreach (var field in lstFields)
{
var fieldValue = obj.GetType()
.GetProperty(field, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance)
.GetValue(obj, null);
((IDictionary<string, object>)objectToReturn).Add(field, fieldValue);
}
return objectToReturn;
}
}
The following is an example of how to use this from your controller.
http://localhost:12345/api/yourapi?fields=field1,field2
public IHttpActionResult Get(string fields = null)
{
try
{
List<string> lstFields = new List<string>();
if (fields != null)
{
lstFields = fields.ToLower().Split(',').ToList();
}
// Custom query
var result = db.data.Select(i => CreateShappedObject(new Data()
, lstFields)).ToList();
return Ok(result);
}
catch(Exception)
{
return InternalServerError();
}
}
var result = from g in list.AsEnumerable()
select new {F1 = g.Field1,F2 = g.Field2};
I simply want to do this:
(inputObj ) => (inputObj .Select(objEln=> hubObjectConverter(objEln)));
inputObj ----> List<elnObject>
hubObjectConverter ----> Func<object,object>
Where am I going wrong?
var typeElnObjList = typeof(List<>).MakeGenericType(new[] { elnObjectType });
var inputObj = Expression.Parameter(typeElnObjList, "lstElnObj");
var paramSelectMeth = Expression.Parameter(elnObjectType, "objEln");
var convertToObject = Expression.Invoke(Expression.Constant(hubObjectConverter), paramSelectMeth);
var lambdaSelect = Expression.Lambda(convertToObject, paramSelectMeth);
var convertList = Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable),
"Select",
new[] { elnObjectType, hubObjectType },
inputObj,
lambdaSelect); <------ I keep getting an error here. Saying Select cannot accept generic type. Where am I going wrong?
(I assume your question is an X/Y problem, so I won't answer your question at face-value)
If your intent is to allow converting from a List<TIn> to a List<TOut> by specifying the type of TOut at runtime with a Type rather than a generic-type parameter then you only need MakeGenericMethod and you don't need to use Expression<> at all:
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
public static class ListExtensions
{
public static IList ConvertList<TSource>( this List<TSource> source, Type destinationType, Func<object,object> hubObjectConverter )
{
if( source is null ) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
if( destinationType is null ) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(destinationType));
//
MethodInfo mi = typeof(ListExtensions)
.GetMethod( nameof(ConvertListImpl), BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic )
.MakeGenericMethod( typeof(TSource), destinationType );
Object result = mi.Invoke( obj: null, new Object[] { source, hubObjectConverter } );
return (IList)result;
}
private static List<TOut> ConvertListImpl<TIn,TOut>( List<TIn> source, Func<Object,Object> converter )
{
return source
.Select( item => converter( item ) )
.Cast<TOut>()
.ToList();
}
}
(To improve performance, the MethodInfo could be cached in a static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<(TIn,TOut),MethodInfo> dictionary).
It would be used like so:
List<Int32> listOfInt32 = new List<Int32>() { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
IList listOfString = listOfInt32.ConvertList( destinationType: typeof(String), obj => obj.ToString() );
Even though listOfString is statically-typed as IList, its actual runtime type is List<String>.
If do know source type ,That is anonymous type . So convert that to object type
class Address
{
public string Street { get; set; }
public Foo Foo { get; set; }
}
class User
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public Address Address { get; set; }
}
public static List<object> ConvertToListOfObjects<T>(List<T> list)
{
return list.ConvertAll<object>(t => t);
}
static void Converttotarget()
{
User testUser = new User()
{
Name = "Paul",
Address = new Address()
{
Street = "Freeway",
Foo = new Foo() { Bar = "Baz" }
}
};
var users = new List<User>();
users.Add(testUser);
var objusers = ConvertToListOfObjects(users);
var testbj = new { name = "test", rol = 1 };
var objelist = new List<object>();
objelist.Add(testbj);
var lst = ConvertToListOfObjects(objelist);
}
I want to optimise this code to reduce the number of if statements. Maybe it'd be better to use a lot of classes, and let the classes handle each required action?
It could be fabric pattern? Or is it OK to use 30+ similar if statements?
I've tried to make a Dictionary with string and object class. But I couldn't get it to work (or my skills are not good enough)
if (node[DATA_CONNECTION_ELEMENT] != null)
{
return new DataConnectionPropertyDataBinding(form, node[DATA_CONNECTION_ELEMENT], inputableEntity);
}
else if (node[FORM_PARAMETER_ELEMENT] != null)
{
return new FormParameterDataBinding(form, node[FORM_PARAMETER_ELEMENT], inputableEntity);
}
// + 30 more else ifs
else if (node[COMMAND_ELEMENT] != null)
{
return new CommandResultDataBinding(form, node[COMMAND_ELEMENT], inputableEntity);
}
else if (node[CONDITION_ELEMENT] != null)
{
return new ConditionDataBinding(form, node[CONDITION_ELEMENT], inputableEntity);
}
else if (node[CLIPBOARD_ELEMENT] != null)
{
return new ClipboardDataBinding(form, node[CLIPBOARD_ELEMENT], inputableEntity);
}
else
{
return new ConstantDataBinding(form, node);
}
Want to make it look something like
foreach (var item in allThatShareSomeInterface)
{
if (item.CanHandle(node.Atributes[0]))
{
return item.neededObject();
}
}
Here is the answer. How it really works.
Dictionary<string, Type> allObjects = new Dictionary<string, Type>();
allObjects.Add(CONDITION_ELEMENT, typeof(ConditionDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(DATA_TYPE_FORMAT_ELEMENT, typeof(DataTypeFormatDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(DATA_TYPE_CONVERT_ELEMENT, typeof(DataTypeConvertDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(FORM_PARAMETER_ELEMENT, typeof(FormParameterDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(FORM_ELEMENT, typeof(FormPropertyDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(STRING_ELEMENT, typeof(StringFormatDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(FORMULA_ELEMENT, typeof(FormulaDataBinding));
allObjects.Add(COMMAND_ELEMENT, typeof(CommandResultDataBinding));
// + many
foreach (var pair in allObjects)
{
if (node[pair.Key] != null)
{
ConstructorInfo ctor = pair.Value.GetConstructor(new[] { typeof(IWorkflowForm), typeof(XmlNode), typeof(IInputable) });
return ctor.Invoke(new object[] { form, node[pair.Key], inputableEntity });
}
}
You may be able to make this work using reflection. It's probably going to make your code a bit slower though.
It should look something like this (not tested):
var pairs = new Dictionary<string, Type>()
{
{
DATA_CONNECTION_ELEMENT, typeof(DataConnectionPropertyDataBinding)
},
{
FORM_PARAMETER_ELEMENT, typeof(FormParameterDataBinding)
}
};
foreach (var pair in pairs)
{
if (node[pair.Key] != null)
{
ConstructorInfo ctor = pair.Value.GetConstructor(new[] { typeof(object), typeof(object), typeof(object) });
return ctor.Invoke(new object[] { form, node[pair.Key], inputableEntity });
}
}
If you know what you are doing, and you indeed need that many binding classes, one way to solve that is custom attributes + reflection + runtime code generation. Here’s an example.
// Enum for element type. The order matters, it's the order in which input dictionary is tested.
enum eElement
{
DataConnection,
FormParameter,
}
// Custom attribute to mark bindings classes with.
class DataBindingAttribute : Attribute
{
public eElement element;
public DataBindingAttribute( eElement e ) { element = e; }
}
// Base class for bindings
abstract class BindingBase { }
// Couple test binding classes
[DataBinding( eElement.DataConnection )]
class DataConnectionPropertyDataBinding: BindingBase
{
public DataConnectionPropertyDataBinding( object data ) { }
}
[DataBinding( eElement.FormParameter )]
class FormParameterDataBinding: BindingBase
{
public readonly object data;
public FormParameterDataBinding( object data ) { this.data = data; }
}
// This static class does the magic.
static class BindingsFactory
{
// Key = eElement from custom attribute, value = function that constructs the binding. This example uses the constructor with single object argument.
// It's a good idea to use strong types for arguments instead.
static readonly SortedDictionary<eElement, Func<object, BindingBase>> dictTypes = new SortedDictionary<eElement, Func<object, BindingBase>>();
static BindingsFactory()
{
// Constructor argument types, just a single `object` in this example.
Type[] constructorArgumentTypes = new Type[ 1 ]
{
typeof( object )
};
ParameterExpression[] constructorArgumentExpressions = constructorArgumentTypes
.Select( tp => Expression.Parameter( tp ) )
.ToArray();
// Find all types in current assembly
var ass = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
foreach( Type tp in ass.GetTypes() )
{
// Try to get the custom attribute
var dba = tp.GetCustomAttribute<DataBindingAttribute>();
if( null == dba )
continue;
// Ensure you don't have 2 classes with the same element ID value
Debug.Assert( !dictTypes.ContainsKey( dba.element ) );
// Ensure the found type inherits from BindingBase
Debug.Assert( typeof( BindingBase ).IsAssignableFrom( tp ) );
// Compile the function that constructs the new binding object
ConstructorInfo ci = tp.GetConstructor( constructorArgumentTypes );
Debug.Assert( null != ci );
// new Binding(...)
var expNew = Expression.New( ci, constructorArgumentExpressions );
// (BindingBase)( new Binding( ... ) )
var expCast = Expression.Convert( expNew, typeof( BindingBase ) );
// Compile into lambda
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<object, BindingBase>>( expCast, constructorArgumentExpressions );
// Compile the lambda, and save in the sorted dictionary
var func = lambda.Compile();
dictTypes.Add( dba.element, func );
}
}
public static BindingBase tryConstruct( Dictionary<eElement, object> dict )
{
foreach( var kvp in dictTypes )
{
object arg;
if( !dict.TryGetValue( kvp.Key, out arg ) )
continue;
return kvp.Value( arg );
}
return null;
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main( string[] args )
{
var dict = new Dictionary<eElement, object>();
dict[ eElement.FormParameter ] = 12;
// This line will construct an instance of FormParameterDataBinding
var res = BindingsFactory.tryConstruct( dict );
}
}
There are a lot of answers for this using a single Type with interfaces and abstract classes which all work fine for one generic T value. What I am trying to achieve I have not seen and am wondering if anyone has an idea.
Scenario
public class Field<T>
{
public Expression<Func<T,object>> FieldName { get; set; }
}
public class FValue<T, F> : Field<T>
{
public F FieldValue { get; set; }
}
//Test
var fieldList = new List<Field<Person>>();
fieldList.Add(new FValue<Person, DateTime> { FieldName=x=>x.SomeDate, FieldValue=DateTime.Now });
fieldList.Add(new FValue<Person, string> { FieldName=x=>x.SomeData, FieldValue="test" });
Ideally i want to do the following:-
The list will contain the same type for T, the type for F will change to various types like date,string etc.
When iterating over the list i want both the FieldName and FieldValue
I can't start the list using new <List<FValue<Persion,string>>();
for the obvious reason that all F values will have to be string.
Also when obtaining the FieldName somehow the value should be casted to Expression<Func<T,F>>.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Whenever you want to use generics you need a specific reason to use it. See this answer about when to use Generics
What is cool about generics, why use them?
As you can see in the link, one of the main reason is to have type-safe properties. This also means that your class will be limited to the specific type. And taking this in consideration, the usages of your class will be limited.
Here is how I could use your class with limited usages that don't require (boxing/unboxing), but still requires casting
private static void UseFieldList<T>(List<Field<T>> fieldList)
{
foreach (var field in fieldList)
{
var propName = field.FieldNameText;
var textField = field as FValue<T, string>;
if (textField != null)
{
// Now can use string specific functions without (boxing/unboxing)
Console.WriteLine(propName + " " + textField.FieldValue );
continue;
}
var dateField = field as FValue<T, DateTime>;
if (dateField != null)
{
// Now can use date specific functions without (boxing/unboxing)
Console.WriteLine(propName + " " + dateField.FieldValue.ToShortDateString());
continue;
}
throw new NotSupportedException("The type of the field is not supported: " + field.GetType().Name);
}
}
To get the name out of a expression you can see the answer here
Retrieving Property name from lambda expression
And to use this I would change the way you are creating the objects to something similar to the usages of Tuple:
// Newer code storing name
fieldList.Add(FValue<Person>.Create(x => x.DateOfBirth, DateTime.Now ));
fieldList.Add(FValue<Person>.Create(x => x.Name, "test"));
// Old code storing expression instead of name
fieldList.Add(new FValue<Person, DateTime> { FieldName = x => x.DateOfBirth, FieldValue = DateTime.Now });
fieldList.Add(new FValue<Person, string> { FieldName = x => x.Name, FieldValue = "test" });
// Not supported Type Int
fieldList.Add(new FValue<Person, int> {FieldName = x => x.Name, FieldValue = 12});
And here is the factory class
public class FValue<T>
{
public static Field<T> Create<F>(Expression<Func<T, F>> fieldNameExpression, F value)
{
return new FValue<T, F>
{
FieldNameText = GetPropertyInfo(fieldNameExpression).Name,
FieldValue = value
};
}
}
Results of the console:
DateOfBirth 1/19/2017
Name test
x => Convert(x.DateOfBirth) 1/19/2017
x => x.Name test
The type of the field is not supported: FValue`2
I'm not sure I see a way around this one without using Reflection. Using these classes:
public class Field<T>
{
public Expression<Func<T, object>> FieldName { get; set; }
}
public class FValue<T, F> : Field<T>
{
public F FieldValue { get; set; }
}
You can iterate over them like so:
var list = new List<Field<string>>();
list.Add(new FValue<string, int>() { FieldName = null, FieldValue = 5 });
foreach (var x in list)
{
Type[] types = x.GetType().GetGenericArguments();
// Dirty check to confirm this is an FValue not a Field
if (types.Length == 2)
{
var fieldName = x.FieldName;
object fieldValue = x.GetType().GetProperty("FieldValue").GetValue(x);
// fieldValue will be "5"
}
}
Consider we have this class :
public class Data
{
public string Field1 { get; set; }
public string Field2 { get; set; }
public string Field3 { get; set; }
public string Field4 { get; set; }
public string Field5 { get; set; }
}
How do I dynamically select for specify columns ? something like this :
var list = new List<Data>();
var result= list.Select("Field1,Field2"); // How ?
Is this the only solution => Dynamic LINQ ?
Selected fields are not known at compile time. They would be specified at runtime
You can do this by dynamically creating the lambda you pass to Select:
Func<Data,Data> CreateNewStatement( string fields )
{
// input parameter "o"
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter( typeof( Data ), "o" );
// new statement "new Data()"
var xNew = Expression.New( typeof( Data ) );
// create initializers
var bindings = fields.Split( ',' ).Select( o => o.Trim() )
.Select( o => {
// property "Field1"
var mi = typeof( Data ).GetProperty( o );
// original value "o.Field1"
var xOriginal = Expression.Property( xParameter, mi );
// set value "Field1 = o.Field1"
return Expression.Bind( mi, xOriginal );
}
);
// initialization "new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit( xNew, bindings );
// expression "o => new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Data,Data>>( xInit, xParameter );
// compile to Func<Data, Data>
return lambda.Compile();
}
Then you can use it like this:
var result = list.Select( CreateNewStatement( "Field1, Field2" ) );
In addition for Nicholas Butler and the hint in comment of Matt(that use T for type of input class), I put an improve to Nicholas answer that generate the property of entity dynamically and the function does not need to send field as parameter.
For Use add class as below:
public static class Helpers
{
public static Func<T, T> DynamicSelectGenerator<T>(string Fields = "")
{
string[] EntityFields;
if (Fields == "")
// get Properties of the T
EntityFields = typeof(T).GetProperties().Select(propertyInfo => propertyInfo.Name).ToArray();
else
EntityFields = Fields.Split(',');
// input parameter "o"
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "o");
// new statement "new Data()"
var xNew = Expression.New(typeof(T));
// create initializers
var bindings = EntityFields.Select(o => o.Trim())
.Select(o =>
{
// property "Field1"
var mi = typeof(T).GetProperty(o);
// original value "o.Field1"
var xOriginal = Expression.Property(xParameter, mi);
// set value "Field1 = o.Field1"
return Expression.Bind(mi, xOriginal);
}
);
// initialization "new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit(xNew, bindings);
// expression "o => new Data { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 }"
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, T>>(xInit, xParameter);
// compile to Func<Data, Data>
return lambda.Compile();
}
}
The DynamicSelectGenerator method get entity with type T, this method have optional input parameter Fields that if you want to select special field from entity send as a string such as "Field1, Field2" and if you don't send anything to method, it returns all of the fields of entity, you could use this method as below:
using (AppDbContext db = new AppDbContext())
{
//select "Field1, Field2" from entity
var result = db.SampleEntity.Select(Helpers.DynamicSelectGenerator<SampleEntity>("Field1, Field2")).ToList();
//select all field from entity
var result1 = db.SampleEntity.Select(Helpers.DynamicSelectGenerator<SampleEntity>()).ToList();
}
(Assume that you have a DbContext with name AppDbContext and the context have an entity with name SampleEntity)
You must use reflection to get and set property value with it's name.
var result = new List<Data>();
var data = new Data();
var type = data.GetType();
var fieldName = "Something";
for (var i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
{
foreach (var property in data.GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (property.Name == fieldName)
{
type.GetProperties().FirstOrDefault(n => n.Name == property.Name).SetValue(data, GetPropValue(list[i], property.Name), null);
result.Add(data);
}
}
}
And here is GetPropValue() method
public static object GetPropValue(object src, string propName)
{
return src.GetType().GetProperty(propName).GetValue(src, null);
}
Using Reflection and Expression bulid can do what you say.
Example:
var list = new List<Data>();
//bulid a expression tree to create a paramter
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Data), "d");
//bulid expression tree:data.Field1
Expression selector = Expression.Property(param,typeof(Data).GetProperty("Field1"));
Expression pred = Expression.Lambda(selector, param);
//bulid expression tree:Select(d=>d.Field1)
Expression expr = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), "Select",
new Type[] { typeof(Data), typeof(string) },
Expression.Constant(list.AsQueryable()), pred);
//create dynamic query
IQueryable<string> query = list.AsQueryable().Provider.CreateQuery<string>(expr);
var result=query.ToList();
I writing the method in following line for you can work with nested fields taking advantage of Nicholas Butler and Ali.
You can use this method for dynamically creating to lambda for pass to select and also works for nested fields. You can also work with IQueryable cases.
/// <param name="Fields">
/// Format1: "Field1"
/// Format2: "Nested1.Field1"
/// Format3: "Field1:Field1Alias"
/// </param>
public static Expression<Func<T, TSelect>> DynamicSelectGenerator<T, TSelect>(params string[] Fields)
{
string[] EntityFields = Fields;
if (Fields == null || Fields.Length == 0)
// get Properties of the T
EntityFields = typeof(T).GetProperties().Select(propertyInfo => propertyInfo.Name).ToArray();
// input parameter "x"
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "x");
// new statement "new Data()"
var xNew = Expression.New(typeof(TSelect));
// create initializers
var bindings = EntityFields
.Select(x =>
{
string[] xFieldAlias = x.Split(":");
string field = xFieldAlias[0];
string[] fieldSplit = field.Split(".");
if (fieldSplit.Length > 1)
{
// original value "x.Nested.Field1"
Expression exp = xParameter;
foreach (string item in fieldSplit)
exp = Expression.PropertyOrField(exp, item);
// property "Field1"
PropertyInfo member2 = null;
if (xFieldAlias.Length > 1)
member2 = typeof(TSelect).GetProperty(xFieldAlias[1]);
else
member2 = typeof(T).GetProperty(fieldSplit[fieldSplit.Length - 1]);
// set value "Field1 = x.Nested.Field1"
var res = Expression.Bind(member2, exp);
return res;
}
// property "Field1"
var mi = typeof(T).GetProperty(field);
PropertyInfo member;
if (xFieldAlias.Length > 1)
member = typeof(TSelect).GetProperty(xFieldAlias[1]);
else member = typeof(TSelect).GetProperty(field);
// original value "x.Field1"
var xOriginal = Expression.Property(xParameter, mi);
// set value "Field1 = x.Field1"
return Expression.Bind(member, xOriginal);
}
);
// initialization "new Data { Field1 = x.Field1, Field2 = x.Field2 }"
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit(xNew, bindings);
// expression "x => new Data { Field1 = x.Field1, Field2 = x.Field2 }"
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, TSelect>>(xInit, xParameter);
return lambda;
}
Usage:
var s = DynamicSelectGenerator<SalesTeam, SalesTeamSelect>(
"Name:SalesTeamName",
"Employee.FullName:SalesTeamExpert"
);
var res = _context.SalesTeam.Select(s);
public class SalesTeam
{
public string Name {get; set; }
public Guid EmployeeId { get; set; }
public Employee Employee { get; set; }
}
public class SalesTeamSelect
{
public string SalesTeamName {get; set; }
public string SalesTeamExpert {get; set; }
}
The OP mentioned Dynamic Linq library, so I'd like to lay out an explanation on its usage.
1. Dynamic Linq Built-In Select
Dynamic Linq has a built-in Select method, which can be used as follows:
var numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
var wrapped = numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num }).ToList();
// the "it" keyword functions as the lambda parameter,
// so essentialy it's like calling: numbers.Select(num => num)
var selectedNumbers = numbers.Select("it");
// the following is the equivalent of calling: wrapped.Select(num => num.Value)
var selectedValues = wrapped.Select("Value");
// the following is the equivalent of calling: numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num })
var selectedObjects = numbers.Select("new(it as Value)");
foreach (int num in selectedNumbers) Console.WriteLine(num);
foreach (int val in selectedValues) Console.WriteLine(val);
foreach (dynamic obj in selectedObjects) Console.WriteLine(obj.Value);
The Downside
There's somewhat a downside using the built-in Select:
Since it's an IQueryable - not IQueryable<T> - extension method, with IQueryable as its return type, common materialization methods - like ToList or FirstOrDefault - can't be used. This is why the above example uses foreach - it's simply the only convenient way of materializing the results.
So to make things more convenient, let's support these methods.
2. Supporting Select<T> in Dynamic Linq (to enable using ToList and alike)
To support Select<T>, it needs to be added into the Dynamic Linq file. The simple steps for doing that are explained in this answer and in my comment on it.
After doing so, it can be used in the following way:
var numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3 };
var wrapped = numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num }).ToList();
// the following is the equivalent of calling: numbers.Select(num => num).ToList()
var selectedNumbers = numbers.Select<int>("it").ToList();
// the following is the equivalent of calling: wrapped.Select(num => num.Value).ToList()
var selectedValues = wrapped.Select<int>("Value").ToList();
// the following is the equivalent of calling: numbers.Select(num => new { Value = num }).ToList()
var selectedObjects = numbers.Select<object>("new(it as Value)").ToList();
The Downside
Arguably, this implementation introduces yet another kind of downside: By having to explicitly parameterize the Select<T> call (e.g., having to call Select<int>), we're losing the dynamic nature of the library.
Nevertheless, since we can now call any materialization Linq method, this usage may still be quite useful.
I simplified the amazing method DynamicSelectGenerator() created by Ali and made this extension method that overrides the LINQ Select() to take a column separated parameters to simplify the usage and for more readability:
public static IEnumerable<T> Select<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, string parameters)
{
return source.Select(DynamicSelectGenerator<T>(parameters));
}
So instead of:
var query = list.Select(Helpers.DynamicSelectGenerator<Data>("Field1,Field2")).ToList();
Will be:
var query = list.Select("Field1,Field2").ToList();
Another approach I've used is a nested ternary operator:
string col = "Column3";
var query = table.Select(i => col == "Column1" ? i.Column1 :
col == "Column2" ? i.Column2 :
col == "Column3" ? i.Column3 :
col == "Column4" ? i.Column4 :
null);
The ternary operator requires that each field be the same type, so you'll need to call .ToString() on any non-string columns.
I have generate my own class for same purpose of usage.
github gist : https://gist.github.com/mstrYoda/663789375b0df23e2662a53bebaf2c7c
It generates dynamic select lambda for given string and also support for two level nested properties.
Example of usage is :
class Shipment {
// other fields...
public Address Sender;
public Address Recipient;
}
class Address {
public string AddressText;
public string CityName;
public string CityId;
}
// in the service method
var shipmentDtos = _context.Shipments.Where(s => request.ShipmentIdList.Contains(s.Id))
.Select(new SelectLambdaBuilder<Shipment>().CreateNewStatement(request.Fields)) // request.Fields = "Sender.CityName,Sender.CityId"
.ToList();
It compiles the lambda as below:
s => new Shipment {
Sender = new Address {
CityId = s.Sender.CityId,
CityName = s.Sender.CityName
}
}
You can also find my quesion and answer here :c# - Dynamically generate linq select with nested properties
public class SelectLambdaBuilder<T>
{
// as a performence consideration I cached already computed type-properties
private static Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]> _typePropertyInfoMappings = new Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]>();
private readonly Type _typeOfBaseClass = typeof(T);
private Dictionary<string, List<string>> GetFieldMapping(string fields)
{
var selectedFieldsMap = new Dictionary<string, List<string>>();
foreach (var s in fields.Split(','))
{
var nestedFields = s.Split('.').Select(f => f.Trim()).ToArray();
var nestedValue = nestedFields.Length > 1 ? nestedFields[1] : null;
if (selectedFieldsMap.Keys.Any(key => key == nestedFields[0]))
{
selectedFieldsMap[nestedFields[0]].Add(nestedValue);
}
else
{
selectedFieldsMap.Add(nestedFields[0], new List<string> { nestedValue });
}
}
return selectedFieldsMap;
}
public Func<T, T> CreateNewStatement(string fields)
{
ParameterExpression xParameter = Expression.Parameter(_typeOfBaseClass, "s");
NewExpression xNew = Expression.New(_typeOfBaseClass);
var selectFields = GetFieldMapping(fields);
var shpNestedPropertyBindings = new List<MemberAssignment>();
foreach (var keyValuePair in selectFields)
{
PropertyInfo[] propertyInfos;
if (!_typePropertyInfoMappings.TryGetValue(_typeOfBaseClass, out propertyInfos))
{
var properties = _typeOfBaseClass.GetProperties();
propertyInfos = properties;
_typePropertyInfoMappings.Add(_typeOfBaseClass, properties);
}
var propertyType = propertyInfos
.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name.ToLowerInvariant().Equals(keyValuePair.Key.ToLowerInvariant()))
.PropertyType;
if (propertyType.IsClass)
{
PropertyInfo objClassPropInfo = _typeOfBaseClass.GetProperty(keyValuePair.Key);
MemberExpression objNestedMemberExpression = Expression.Property(xParameter, objClassPropInfo);
NewExpression innerObjNew = Expression.New(propertyType);
var nestedBindings = keyValuePair.Value.Select(v =>
{
PropertyInfo nestedObjPropInfo = propertyType.GetProperty(v);
MemberExpression nestedOrigin2 = Expression.Property(objNestedMemberExpression, nestedObjPropInfo);
var binding2 = Expression.Bind(nestedObjPropInfo, nestedOrigin2);
return binding2;
});
MemberInitExpression nestedInit = Expression.MemberInit(innerObjNew, nestedBindings);
shpNestedPropertyBindings.Add(Expression.Bind(objClassPropInfo, nestedInit));
}
else
{
Expression mbr = xParameter;
mbr = Expression.PropertyOrField(mbr, keyValuePair.Key);
PropertyInfo mi = _typeOfBaseClass.GetProperty( ((MemberExpression)mbr).Member.Name );
var xOriginal = Expression.Property(xParameter, mi);
shpNestedPropertyBindings.Add(Expression.Bind(mi, xOriginal));
}
}
var xInit = Expression.MemberInit(xNew, shpNestedPropertyBindings);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T,T>>( xInit, xParameter );
return lambda.Compile();
}
Thank you #morio. Your comment about Expression<Func<T, T>> is exactly what I needed to make this work.
I do not know how to perform an anonymous projection which seems like what most want. I say I want Field1 and Field2 from Data and I get back something like: new { Field1 = o.Field1, Field2 = o.Field2 };
But I have a need similar to many where I want to plot x and y values, but don't know until run time which ones they are.
So rather than use an anonymous object, I create one that has the properties I want. In this case, X and Y.
Here are the source and target classes:
public class Source
{
public int PropertyA { get; set; }
public double PropertyB { get; set; }
public double PropertyC { get; set; }
}
public class Target
{
public double X { get; set; }
public double Y { get; set; }
}
And here is the code that does the mapping between the Source and the Target.
public static class SelectBuilder
{
/// <summary>
/// Creates a Func that can be used in a Linq Select statement that will map from the source items to a new target type.
/// Typical usage pattern is that you have an Entity that has many properties, but you want to dynamically set properties
/// on a smaller target type, AND, you don't know the mapping at compile time.
/// For example, you have an Entity that has a year and 10 properties. You want to have time (year) as the X axis, but
/// the user can chose any of the 10 properties to plot on the y axis. This would allow you to map one of the entity
/// properties to the Y value dynamically.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TSource">Type of the source, for example, and Entity Framework entity.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TTarget">Type of the target, a projection of a smaller number of properties than the entity has.</typeparam>
/// <param name="propertyMappings">A list of named tuples that map the sourceProperty to the targetProperty.</param>
/// <returns>A func that can be used inside the Select.
/// So if
/// var select = SelectBuilder.GetSelectStatement<Source, Target>(propertyMappings), then
/// you can perform the select,
/// var results = items.Select(select);</returns>
public static Expression<Func<TSource, TTarget>> GetSelectStatement<TSource, TTarget>(IEnumerable<(string sourceProperty, string targetProperty)> propertyMappings)
{
// Get the source parameter, "source". This will allow the statement to be "X = source.SourceA".
// It needs to be of the source type, and the name is what will be used in the Select lambda.
var sourceParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "source");
// Now define the ability to create a new Target type.
var newTarget = Expression.New(typeof(TTarget));
// Now develop the bindings or member assignments for each property.
var bindings = new List<MemberAssignment>();
foreach (var propertyMapping in propertyMappings)
{
var sourceMemberInfo = typeof(TSource).GetProperty(propertyMapping.sourceProperty);
var targetMemberInfo = typeof(TTarget).GetProperty(propertyMapping.targetProperty);
// This allows getting the value. Source parameter will provide the "source" part and sourceMemberInfo the property name.
// For example, "source.SourceA".
var sourceValue = Expression.Property(sourceParameter, sourceMemberInfo);
// Provide conversion in the event there is not a perfect match for the type.
// For example, if SourceA is int and the target X is double?, we need to convert from int to double?
var convertExpression = Expression.Convert(sourceValue, targetMemberInfo.PropertyType);
// Put together the target assignment, "X = Convert(source.SourcA, double?)" (TODO: How does the convert actually happen?)
var targetAssignment = Expression.Bind(targetMemberInfo, convertExpression);
bindings.Add(targetAssignment);
}
var memberInit = Expression.MemberInit(newTarget, bindings);
// Here if we map SourceA to X and SourceB to Y the lambda will be:
// {source => new Target() {X = Convert(source.SourceA, Nullable`1), Y = Convert(source.SourceB, Nullable`1)}}
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, TTarget>>(memberInit, sourceParameter);
return lambda;//.Compile();
}
}
And finally a unit test that works.
[Fact(DisplayName = "GetSelectStatement works")]
public void Test2()
{
// Arrange
var source = new Source { PropertyA = 1, PropertyB = 2, PropertyC = 3 };
var expectedX = Convert.ToDouble(source.PropertyA);
var expectedY = Convert.ToDouble(source.PropertyB);
var items = new List<Source> { source }.AsQueryable();
// Let's map SourceA to X and SourceB to Y.
var propertyMappings = new List<(string sourceProperty, string targetProperty)>
{
("PropertyA", "X"), ("PropertyB", "Y")
//(nameof(Source.PropertyA), nameof(Target.X)),
//(nameof(Source.PropertyB), nameof(Target.Y))
};
// Act
var select = SelectBuilder.GetSelectStatement<Source, Target>(propertyMappings);
var actual = items.Select(select).First();
// Assert
actual.X.Should().Be(expectedX);
actual.Y.Should().Be(expectedY);
}
I've edited my previous answer since now I know how to convert from int to double. I've also made the unit test easier to understand.
I hope this helps others.
Using ExpandoObject you can build a dynamic objects or return the full object from the example below.
public object CreateShappedObject(object obj, List<string> lstFields)
{
if (!lstFields.Any())
{
return obj;
}
else
{
ExpandoObject objectToReturn = new ExpandoObject();
foreach (var field in lstFields)
{
var fieldValue = obj.GetType()
.GetProperty(field, BindingFlags.IgnoreCase | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance)
.GetValue(obj, null);
((IDictionary<string, object>)objectToReturn).Add(field, fieldValue);
}
return objectToReturn;
}
}
The following is an example of how to use this from your controller.
http://localhost:12345/api/yourapi?fields=field1,field2
public IHttpActionResult Get(string fields = null)
{
try
{
List<string> lstFields = new List<string>();
if (fields != null)
{
lstFields = fields.ToLower().Split(',').ToList();
}
// Custom query
var result = db.data.Select(i => CreateShappedObject(new Data()
, lstFields)).ToList();
return Ok(result);
}
catch(Exception)
{
return InternalServerError();
}
}
var result = from g in list.AsEnumerable()
select new {F1 = g.Field1,F2 = g.Field2};