We Keep Coding

What interface type is suited for implementing strategy with different signature?

consider the following game code:
public class Player : MonoBehaviour {
public void UseItem(Item item) {
item.Use(this);
}
public void GetDrunk() {}
}
public class Item {
public WhatInterface[] itemUsages;
public void Use(Player player) {
foreach(var usage in itemUsages) {
usage.Execute(new ItemUsageArgs {itemUser = player, itemUsed = this})
}
}
}
public class GameManager : MonoBehaviour {
public Player mainCharacter;
public Item beer = new Item {itemUsages = new [] {
new TestConsole(),
new DamageFromItem (),
new DrunkFromITem ()
}}
private void Start() {
mainCharacter.Use(beer);
}
}
public class TestConsole : WhatInterface {
public void Execute(BaseArgs args) {
Debug.Log("function call executed");
}
}
public class DamageFromItem : WhatInterface {
public void Execute(ItemUsageArgs args) {
Debug.Log(args.itemUser + " take damage from " + args.itemUsed);
}
}
public class DrunkFromITem : WhatInterface {
public void Execute(ItemUsageArgs args) {
args.itemUser.GetDrunk();
}
}
public class BaseArgs {}
public class ItemUsageArgs : BaseArgs {
public Player itemUser;
public Item itemUsed;
}
so how to create interface type code that is suited for itemUsages?
Or do I wrongly create the design for this context?
Basically I'm trying strategy pattern so that item usages could be vary for every kind of item.
Things I tried, creating IItemUsage interface:
public interface IItemUsage {
void Execute(ItemUsageArgs args);
// but then anything that needs to implement this interface must use this method, even though it only needs BaseArgs.
// TestConsole class must conform to Execute(ItemUsageArgs) signature..
}
public class TestConsole : IItemUsage {
public void Execute(BaseArgs args) {
Debug.Log("function call executed");
}
// this won't compile
}

Assuming this is all of your code, you can make IItemUsage generic, and contravairant on the generic parameter.
public interface IItemUsage<in T> where T: BaseArgs {
void Execute(T args);
}
Have TestConsole implement IItemUsage<BaseArgs> and the other two classes implement IItemUsage<ItemUsageArgs>.
Now you can put instances of all three classes into an IItemUsage<ItemUsageArgs>[]:
IItemUsage<ItemUsageArgs>[] arr = new IItemUsage<ItemUsageArgs>[] {
new TestConsole(), new DamageFromItem(), new DrunkFromITem()
};

If you want to implement interface with some method, which has input arguments, that can be different types, you must define base argument class or use interface parameter instead.
For example:
public interface IItemUsage
{
void Execute(IItemUsageArgs args);
}
public interface IItemUsageArgs
{
//place public part of all ItemUsageArgs
}
public class ItemUsageArgs1 : IItemUsageArgs
{
}
public class ItemUsageArgs2 : IItemUsageArgs
{
}
public class ItemUsage1 :IItemUsage
{
public void Execute(ItemUsageArgs1 args)
{
//do you need
}
void IItemUsage.Execute(IItemUsageArgs args)
{
Execute(args as ItemUsageArgs1);
}
}
public class ItemUsage2 : IItemUsage
{
public void Execute(ItemUsageArgs2 args)
{
//do you need
}
void IItemUsage.Execute(IItemUsageArgs args)
{
Execute(args as ItemUsageArgs2);
}
}

MVVMCross Messenger - Subscribing to messages in static class

I am just looking into implementing an MVVMCross Messenger solution that will enable me to upload information to Google Analytics when published from either the iOS application or the PCL.
The problem I have the is that the subscription delgates are not fired after I publish. Can you subscribe to MVVMCross Messenger subscriptions from a static class?
Subscriptions in static class
public static class GoogleAnalyticsWrapper //: IDisposable
{
private const string TrackingId = "xxxxxxxxxxx";
private static readonly IMvxMessenger messenger;
private static readonly MvxSubscriptionToken screenNameToken;
private static readonly MvxSubscriptionToken eventToken;
private static readonly MvxSubscriptionToken exceptionToken;
private static readonly MvxSubscriptionToken performanceToken;
private static readonly MvxSubscriptionToken publishToken;
private static bool disposed = false;
private static SafeHandle handle;
static GoogleAnalyticsWrapper()
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DispatchInterval = 60;
Gai.SharedInstance.TrackUncaughtExceptions = true;
Gai.SharedInstance.GetTracker(TrackingId);
messenger = new MvxMessengerHub();// Mvx.Resolve<IMvxMessenger>();
screenNameToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaScreenNameMessage>((m) => SetScreenName(m));
int count = messenger.CountSubscriptionsFor<GaScreenNameMessage>();
eventToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaEventMessage>(CreateEvent);
exceptionToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaExceptionMessage>(CreateException);
performanceToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaPerformanceTimingMessage>(CreatePerformanceMetric);
publishToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaPublishMessage>(PublishAll);
}
public static string Dummy { get; set; }
public static void SetScreenName(GaScreenNameMessage message)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break();
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Set(GaiConstants.ScreenName, message.ScreenName);
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateScreenView().Build());
}
public static void CreateEvent(GaEventMessage message)
=> Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateEvent(message.Category, message.Action, message.Label, message.Number).Build());
private static void CreateException(GaExceptionMessage message)
=> Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateException(message.ExceptionMessage, message.IsFatal).Build());
private static void CreatePerformanceMetric(GaPerformanceTimingMessage message)
=> Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateTiming(message.Category, message.Milliseconds, message.Name, message.Label).Build());
private static void PublishAll(GaPublishMessage message)
=> Gai.SharedInstance.Dispatch();
public static void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
private void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (!disposed)
{
if (disposing)
{
// Dispose managed resources.
if (handle != null)
{
handle.Dispose();
}
}
// Dispose unmanaged managed resources.
disposed = true;
}
}
}
Publication
messengerService.Publish<GaEventMessage>(new GaEventMessage(this, "Event", "Publish Event", "Publish Event From First View Model", 123));

The problem is, that you are creating a new MvxMessengerHub in your static class, but (I guess) inject IMvxMessenger in your consuming classes, which is created by MvvMCross during the initialization lifecycle and so a different instance.
The easy solution would be to initialize it in your App.cs like
public class App : Cirrious.MvvmCross.ViewModels.MvxApplication
{
public override void Initialize()
{
// ...
var m = Cirrious.CrossCore.Mvx.Resolve<IMvxMessenger>();
GoogleAnalyticsWrapper.Initialize(m);
// ...
}
}
With a wrapper like this
public static class GoogleAnalyticsWrapper
{
static void Initialize(IMvxMessenger messenger)
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DispatchInterval = 60;
Gai.SharedInstance.TrackUncaughtExceptions = true;
Gai.SharedInstance.GetTracker(TrackingId);
screenNameToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaScreenNameMessage>((m) => SetScreenName(m));
int count = messenger.CountSubscriptionsFor<GaScreenNameMessage>();
eventToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaEventMessage>(CreateEvent);
exceptionToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaExceptionMessage>(CreateException);
performanceToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaPerformanceTimingMessage>(CreatePerformanceMetric);
publishToken = messenger.Subscribe<GaPublishMessage>(PublishAll);
}
// ...
}
Advanced Hint
But as far as I see, you don't even need messaging for this case, because it's one to one "communication". I think it would be nice, if you move the functionality of your GoogleAnalyticsWrapper into a well defined Service like:
interface ITrackingService
{
void SetScreenName(GaScreenNameMessage message);
void CreateEvent(GaEventMessage message);
void CreateException(GaExceptionMessage message);
void CreatePerformanceMetric(GaPerformanceTimingMessage message);
void PublishAll(GaPublishMessage message);
}
public class GoogleAnalyticsTrackingService : ITrackingService
{
private const string TrackingId = "xxxxxxxxxxx";
public GoogleAnalyticsTrackingService()
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DispatchInterval = 60;
Gai.SharedInstance.TrackUncaughtExceptions = true;
Gai.SharedInstance.GetTracker(TrackingId);
}
public void SetScreenName(GaScreenNameMessage message)
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Set(GaiConstants.ScreenName, message.ScreenName);
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateScreenView().Build());
}
public void CreateEvent(GaEventMessage message)
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateEvent(message.Category, message.Action, message.Label, message.Number).Build());
}
private void CreateException(GaExceptionMessage message)
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateException(message.ExceptionMessage, message.IsFatal).Build());
}
private void CreatePerformanceMetric(GaPerformanceTimingMessage message)
{
Gai.SharedInstance.DefaultTracker.Send(DictionaryBuilder.CreateTiming(message.Category, message.Milliseconds, message.Name, message.Label).Build());
}
private void PublishAll(GaPublishMessage message)
{
Gai.SharedInstance.Dispatch();
}
}
That has to be registered in your App
Mvx.LazyConstructAndRegisterSingleton<ITrackingService, GoogleAnalyticsTrackingService>();
And can be consumed with constructor injection or manual resolves
class MyViewModel : MvxViewModel
{
public MyViewModel(ITrackingService tracking)
{
tracking.CreateEvent(new GaEventMessage(this, "Event", "Publish Event", "Publish Event From First View Model", 123));
}
}
// or
class MyViewModel : MvxViewModel
{
public MyViewModel()
{
var tracking = Mvx.Resolve<ITrackingService>();
tracking.CreateEvent(new GaEventMessage(this, "Event", "Publish Event", "Publish Event From First View Model", 123));
}
}
There is still one Problem: The interface has still a dependency to google analytics. But the dependency can be easily removed by using multiple parameters instead of a parameter object.
interface ITrackingService
{
void CreateEvent(string eventName, string title, string message, params object[] additionalParams);
// ...
}
// call:
tracking.CreateEvent("Event", "Publish Event", "Publish Event From First View Model", 123);
With this, you are able to unit test it and exchange the tracking service with litte effort, if your stakeholders decide to switch to adobe omniture or whatever.

Understanding generics and Func arguments

I would not be surprised if this has been answered somewhere, the problem is I am not sure how to phrase a search to find what I need. The things I have already found have either been too simplistic to be usable or poorly explained such that I cannot translate it into my own project. I had no formal instruction with event handlers, delegates, and the like (heck, I didn't even learn about Entity-Component Systems--or other design patterns--until long after I graduated college and was already employed as a programmer, and even then it wasn't something I learned at, or for, my job).
Essentially what I want to know is, what does the definition of Array.Sort<T>(T[] array, Comparison<T> comparison) look like?
There's clearly some kind of generalization going on, as myCompareDelegate(...) takes two arguments of any type. In almost everything I've found relating to Func arguments, a Func<> parameter requires explicitly declared types, with the exception of some sample code using an operator I am unfamiliar with:
SomeUtility(arg => new MyType());
public void SomeUtility<T>(Func<object, T> converter) {
var myType = converter("foo");
}
It compiles but I have no idea what it does and as such, I do not know how to utilize it to create code that will run or do what I want to do.
My goal here is to be able to create an event system (yes, I'm aware that C# has an event system built in, but again, all the sample code I've seen is either simplified to the point of uselessness--listeners contained in the same class as the dispatcher--or complicated and unexplained). I want the following to be true:
a single function to register an event listener (for any Type of event and its subtypes)
a single function to dispatch an event (calling only the relevant listeners)
to be able to create new event types without having to modify the functions for registration and handling (no explicit types in the dispatcher beyond the base event class) provided the new event type extends the allowable event type (i.e. an Entity will only dispatch EntityEvents not WorldEvents).
I have a system that works currently, but it requires that all my handlers pass through a single "onEvent" function which takes a base event object and figures out what it's actual type is, passing that off to the true handler.
Eg:
//Entity implements IEventDispatcher
public SomeConstructor(Entity ent) {
//public delegate void EventListener(EventBase eventData); is declared
//in the IEventDispatcher interface.
ent.attachEvent(typeof(EntityEventPreRender), new EventListener(onEvent));
ent.attachEvent(typeof(EntityEventPostRender), new EventListener(onEvent));
}
//EntityEventPreRender extends EntityEventRender extends EntityEvent extends EventBase
//EntityEventPostRender extends EntityEventRender extends EntityEvent extends EventBase
public void onEvent(EventBase data) {
if(data is EntityEventPreRender)
onPre((EntityEventPreRender)data);
if(data is EntityEventPostRender)
onPost((EntityEventPostRender)data);
}
public void onPre(EntityEventPreRender evt) {}
public void onPost(EntityEventPostRender evt) {}
attachEvent() here is a function that takes a Type (used as a HashMap key) and a Delegate and stores it in a list (the HashMap value). Dispatching the event just needs to pass the EventData object, which is queried for its type (via evt.GetType()) to retrieve the list of listeners, then invoking them: listItem(evt)
But I'd rather be able to just do this:
public SomeConstructor(Entity ent) {
ent.attachEvent(onPre);
ent.attachEvent(onPost);
}
public void onPre(EntityEventPreRender evt) {}
public void onPost(EntityEventPostRender evt) {}
But I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to do this because I do not know how to declare the attachEvent() function to take a generic function parameter the way Array.Sort<T>(T[] array, Comparison<T> comparison) does. I get the error:
"The type arguments for method doSomething<T>(SomeClass.Thing<T>)' cannot be inferred from the usage. Try specifying the type arguments explicitly."

I think you might be looking for something like the following:
public static class PubSub<TMessage>
{
private static List
<
Action
<
TMessage
>
> listeners = new List<Action<TMessage>>();
public static void Listen(Action<TMessage> listener)
{
if (listener != null) listeners.Add(listener);
}
public static void Unlisten(Action<TMessage> listener)
{
if (listeners.Contains(listener)) listeners.Remove(listener);
}
public static void Broadcast(TMessage message)
{
foreach(var listener in listeners) listener(message);
}
}
In the above code, using PubSub and specifying a type for TMessage creates a new static class in memory with its own memory space allocated for storing a separate list of listeners. The compiler will ensure that only the substituted type for TMessage and its subclasses will be allowed in that list, provided you consistently use the base type as the type argument for the TMessage type parameter.
You would then use it like so:
public class SomeMessageType
{
public int SomeId;
public string SomeDescription;
}
public class SomePublisher
{
public void DoSomethingCool(string description)
{
var randomizer = new Random();
...
PubSub<SomeMessageType>.Broadcast(new SomeMessageType(){SomeId = randomizer.Next(), SomeDescription = description});
}
}
public class SomeListener
{
static SomeListener()
{
PubSub<SomeMessageType>.Listen(SomeMessageEvent);
}
private static void SomeMessageEvent(SomeMessageType message)
{
// do something with the message
}
}
If you then create another class SomeOtherMessageType which does not inherit from SomeMessageType and make similar calls to it, it will only broadcast to listeners of that specific type.
EDITED:
Here is a full proof of concept that compiles that you can run in a console app to allay any remaining concerns you may have over efficacy of this technique.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace TestPubSub
{
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Program.startListeners();
Program.sendTestMessages();
Program.stopConsoleFromExitingImmediately();
}
private static void startListeners()
{
SomeListener.Listen();
SomeOtherListener1.Listen();
SomeOtherListener2.Listen();
}
private static void sendTestMessages()
{
var publisher1 = new SomePublisher();
var publisher2 = new SomeOtherPublisher();
publisher1.DoSomethingCool("Hello world");
publisher2.DoSomethingElse(DateTime.Now);
}
private static void stopConsoleFromExitingImmediately()
{
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public static class PubSub<TMessage>
{
private static List
<
Action
<
TMessage
>
> listeners = new List<Action<TMessage>>();
public static void Listen(Action<TMessage> listener)
{
if (listener != null) listeners.Add(listener);
}
public static void Unlisten(Action<TMessage> listener)
{
if (listeners.Contains(listener)) listeners.Remove(listener);
}
public static void Broadcast(TMessage message)
{
foreach(var listener in listeners) listener(message);
}
}
public class SomeMessageType
{
public int SomeId;
public string SomeDescription;
}
public class SomeOtherMessageType
{
public DateTime SomeDate;
public Double SomeAmount;
}
public class SomePublisher
{
public void DoSomethingCool(string description)
{
var randomizer = new Random();
PubSub<SomeMessageType>.Broadcast(new SomeMessageType(){SomeId = randomizer.Next(), SomeDescription = description});
}
}
public class SomeOtherPublisher
{
public void DoSomethingElse(DateTime when)
{
var randomizer = new Random();
PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType>.Broadcast(new SomeOtherMessageType(){SomeAmount = randomizer.NextDouble(), SomeDate = when});
}
}
public class SomeListener
{
public static void Listen()
{
PubSub<SomeMessageType>.Listen(SomeMessageEvent);
}
private static void SomeMessageEvent(SomeMessageType message)
{
Console.WriteLine("Attention! SomeMessageType receieved by SomeListener with\r\nid: {0}\r\ndescription: {1}\r\n", message.SomeId, message.SomeDescription);
}
}
public class SomeOtherListener1
{
public static void Listen()
{
PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType>.Listen(SomeMessageEvent);
}
private static void SomeMessageEvent(SomeOtherMessageType message)
{
Console.WriteLine("Heads up! SomeOtherMessageType receieved by SomeOtherListener1 with\r\namount: {0}\r\ndate: {1}\r\n", message.SomeAmount, message.SomeDate);
}
}
public class SomeOtherListener2
{
public static void Listen()
{
PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType>.Listen(SomeMessageEvent);
}
private static void SomeMessageEvent(SomeOtherMessageType message)
{
Console.WriteLine("Yo! SomeOtherMessageType receieved by SomeOtherListener2 withr\namount: {0}\r\ndate: {1}\r\n", message.SomeAmount, message.SomeDate);
}
}
}
EDITED AGAIN (Alternate proof of concept using an instance based pubs):
Here is a proof of concept using an instance based PubSub.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace TestPubSub
{
public class Program
{
private static PubSub<SomeMessageType> pubSub1 = new PubSub<SomeMessageType>();
private static PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType> pubSub2 = new PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType>();
private static SomeListener listener1 = new SomeListener();
private static SomeOtherListener1 listener2 = new SomeOtherListener1();
private static SomeOtherListener2 listener3 = new SomeOtherListener2();
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Program.startListeners();
Program.sendTestMessages();
Program.stopConsoleFromExitingImmediately();
}
private static void startListeners()
{
Program.listener1.Listen(Program.pubSub1);
Program.listener2.Listen(Program.pubSub2);
Program.listener3.Listen(Program.pubSub2);
}
private static void sendTestMessages()
{
var publisher1 = new SomePublisher(Program.pubSub1);
var publisher2 = new SomeOtherPublisher(Program.pubSub2);
publisher1.DoSomethingCool("Hello world");
publisher2.DoSomethingElse(DateTime.Now);
}
private static void stopConsoleFromExitingImmediately()
{
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public class PubSub<TMessage>
{
private List
<
Action
<
TMessage
>
> listeners = new List<Action<TMessage>>();
public void Listen(Action<TMessage> listener)
{
if (listener != null) this.listeners.Add(listener);
}
public void Unlisten(Action<TMessage> listener)
{
if (listeners.Contains(listener)) this.listeners.Remove(listener);
}
public void Broadcast(TMessage message)
{
foreach(var listener in this.listeners) listener(message);
}
}
public class SomeMessageType
{
public int SomeId;
public string SomeDescription;
}
public class SomeOtherMessageType
{
public DateTime SomeDate;
public Double SomeAmount;
}
public class SomePublisher
{
private PubSub<SomeMessageType> pubSub;
public SomePublisher(PubSub<SomeMessageType> pubSub) { this.pubSub = pubSub; }
public void DoSomethingCool(string description)
{
var randomizer = new Random();
this.pubSub.Broadcast(new SomeMessageType(){SomeId = randomizer.Next(), SomeDescription = description});
}
}
public class SomeOtherPublisher
{
private PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType> pubSub;
public SomeOtherPublisher(PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType> pubSub) { this.pubSub = pubSub; }
public void DoSomethingElse(DateTime when)
{
var randomizer = new Random();
this.pubSub.Broadcast(new SomeOtherMessageType(){SomeAmount = randomizer.NextDouble(), SomeDate = when});
}
}
public class SomeListener
{
public void Listen(PubSub<SomeMessageType> pubSub)
{
pubSub.Listen(this.SomeMessageEvent);
}
private void SomeMessageEvent(SomeMessageType message)
{
Console.WriteLine("Attention! SomeMessageType receieved by SomeListener with\r\nid: {0}\r\ndescription: {1}\r\n", message.SomeId, message.SomeDescription);
}
}
public class SomeOtherListener1
{
public void Listen(PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType> pubSub)
{
pubSub.Listen(this.SomeMessageEvent);
}
private void SomeMessageEvent(SomeOtherMessageType message)
{
Console.WriteLine("Heads up! SomeOtherMessageType receieved by SomeOtherListener1 with\r\namount: {0}\r\ndate: {1}\r\n", message.SomeAmount, message.SomeDate);
}
}
public class SomeOtherListener2
{
public void Listen(PubSub<SomeOtherMessageType> pubSub)
{
pubSub.Listen(this.SomeMessageEvent);
}
private void SomeMessageEvent(SomeOtherMessageType message)
{
Console.WriteLine("Yo! SomeOtherMessageType receieved by SomeOtherListener2 withr\namount: {0}\r\ndate: {1}\r\n", message.SomeAmount, message.SomeDate);
}
}
}

Inheriting a generic in c#

I've inherited a large codebase and I'm trying to implement some new functionality into the framework. Basically, in order to do it the "right" way, I would have to modify the entire structure of the framework. since I'm not the guy who designed the framework, nor am I a mind reader, doing so probably isn't going to happen (although I would really love to redesign it all from scratch myself).
So in order to do what I want, I'm trying to implement a decorator pattern, of sorts. This answer from maliger suggests that what I'm doing below is perfectly valid. However, mono doesn't seem to like it; it complains that T cannot be derived from when I declare HappyDecorator
Please forgive the overly simplistic example, but it gets the point across.
public class HappyObject
{
public virtual void print()
{
Console.WriteLine ("I'm happy");
}
}
public class VeryHappyObject : HappyObject
{
public override void print()
{
Console.WriteLine ("I'm very happy");
}
public void LeapForJoy()
{
Console.WriteLine("Leaping For Joy!");
}
}
public class SuperHappyObject : VeryHappyObject
{
public override void print()
{
Console.WriteLine ("I'm super happy!");
}
public void DieOfLaughter()
{
Console.WriteLine("Me Dead!");
}
}
public class HappyDecorator<T> : T where T : HappyObject
{
public string SpecialFactor { get; set; }
public void printMe()
{
Console.WriteLine (SpecialFactor);
print();
}
}
class MainClass
{
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
HappyDecorator<HappyObject> obj = new HappyDecorator<HappyObject> ();
obj.SpecialFactor = Console.ReadLine();
obj.printMe();
}
}

You're typing HappyDecorator to T, but there's no instance of T to use inside that class.
public class HappyDecorator<T> where T : HappyObject
{
private readonly T _instance;
public HappyDecorator(T instance)
{
_instance = instance;
}
public string SpecialFactor { get; set; }
public void printMe()
{
Console.WriteLine(SpecialFactor);
_instance.print();
}
}
Another alternative is to structure it like this with a generic method instead of a generic class. It's not really a decorator then though:
public class HappyDecorator
{
public string SpecialFactor { get; set; }
public void printMe<T>(T instance) where T : HappyObject
{
Console.WriteLine(SpecialFactor);
instance.print();
}
}
And call like:
HappyDecorator obj = new HappyDecorator();
obj.SpecialFactor = Console.ReadLine();
obj.printMe(new HappyObject());

I think this is what you are trying to do:
public interface IhappyObject
{
void Print();
}
public class HappyObject : IhappyObject
{
private IhappyObject obj;
public HappyObject(IhappyObject obj)
{
this.obj = obj;
}
public void Print()
{
obj.Print();
}
}
public class VeryHappyObject : IhappyObject
{
public void Print()
{
Console.WriteLine("I'm very happy");
}
}
public class SuperHappyObject : IhappyObject
{
public void Print()
{
Console.WriteLine("I'm super happy!");
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
HappyObject obj = new HappyObject(new SuperHappyObject());
obj.Print();
}

How to forward asynchronous events to parent classes?

I'm unsure as to what is the best approach for passing events down the line to parent classes and in need of some feedback.
The example code below tries to illustrate what I want to achieve.
namespace test {
public delegate void TestCompletedEventHandler(object sender,
TestCompletedEventArgs e);
public class Manager {
CarList m_carlist = null;
public CarList Cars {
get { return m_carlist; }
set { m_carlist = value; }
}
public Manager() {
Cars = new CarList(this);
}
public void Report(bool successfull) {
//...
}
}
public class CarList : List<Car> {
protected internal event TestCompletedEventHandler
Car_TestCompleted = null;
protected readonly Manager m_manager = null;
public Manager Manager {
get { return m_manager; }
}
public CarList(Manager manager) {
m_manager = manager;
}
public void Test() {
foreach(Car car in this) {
bool ret = car.Test();
manager.Report(ret);
}
}
public void Add(Car car) {
//Is this a good approach?
car.TestCompleted +=
new TestCompletedEventHandler(Car_TestCompleted_Method);
base.Add(car);
}
private void Car_TestCompleted_Method(object sender,
TestCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if(Car_TestCompleted != null) Car_TestCompleted(sender, e);
}
}
public class Car {
protected internal event TestCompletedEventHandler
TestCompleted = null;
public bool Test() {
//...
if(TestCompleted != null) TestCompleted(this,
new TestCompletedEventArgs())
}
}
public class TestCompletedEventArgs : EventArgs {
//...
}
}
using test;
Manager manager = new Manager();
manager.Cars.Car_TestCompleted +=
new TestCompletedEventHandler (Car_TestCompleted_Method);
manager.Cars.Test();
Another more specific example:
//Contains DataItems and interfaces for working with them
class DataList
{
public List<DataItem> m_dataitems { get; set; }
public TestManager m_testmanager { get; set; }
// ...
}
class DataItem
{
// ...
}
//A manager class for running tests on a DataList
class TestManager
{
public List<TestSource> m_sources { get; set; }
public WorkerManager m_workermanager { get; set; }
// ...
}
//A common interface for Tests
abstract class TestSource
{
public event EventHandler<EventArgs<object>> Completed = null;
protected TestManager m_owner { get; set; }
public abstract void RunAsync();
// ...
}
//A test
class Test1 : TestSource
{
public virtual void RunAsync()
{
//Add commands
//Run workers
//Report progress to DataList and other listeners (like UI)
//Events seem like a bad approach since they need to be forwarded through many levels of abstraction
if(Completed != null) Completed(this, new EventArgs<object>(null));
}
// ...
}
//Manages a number of workers and a queue of commands
class WorkerManager
{
public List<MyWorker> m_workers { get; set; }
public Queue<Command> m_commands { get; set; }
}
//Wrapper for BackgroundWorker
class MyWorker
{
// ...
}
//Async command
interface Command
{
// ...
}

I think you may have just over implemented this a bit... It looks like you are trying to use async operations. Even if you are using sync operations though, typically you'd just use callback methods instead of events in a case like this...
Here is an example of things to change to use callbacks here:
//new delegate
public delegate void CarReportCallback(Car theCar, bool result);
//in the Manager class, make report conform to delegate's signature
public void Report(Car theCar, bool result)
{
//do something, you know which car and what the result is.
}
//in the CarList class pass a reference to the report method in
public void Test()
{
foreach(Car car in this)
{
car.Test(manager.Report);
}
}
//in the Car class use the delegate passed to invoke the reporting
public void Test(CarReportCallback callback)
{
//... do stuff
callback(this, isTestCompleted);
}

It seems reasonable, but I'm not really sure what the use case is and how this would be used.
You've got a strong concept of containment going on, but I'm not really sure why. Also, it's kind of weird that the CarList 'sort of' seems to have ownership of the individual cars.
Additionally, I don't know why Test() on the Car class would both return a result and raise an event. It seems like you're having two different paths to return the same data. And the Manager class seems completely redundant with the CarList class at first glance.
What is the problem you're actually trying to solve here? That might help me with defining a good solution to it.

It wouldn't make sense to just have each car call an event which calls an event on the parent list. I would do it more like this:
namespace test {
public delegate void TestCompletedEventHandler(object sender,
TestCompletedEventArgs e);
public class Manager {
CarList m_carlist = null;
public CarList Cars {
get { return m_carlist; }
set { m_carlist = value; }
}
public Manager() {
Cars = new CarList(this);
}
public void Report(bool successful) {
//...
}
}
public class CarList : List<Car> {
protected readonly Manager m_manager = null;
protected List<Action<object, TestCompletedEventArgs>> delegatesList = new List<Action<object, TestCompletedEventArgs>>();
public Manager Manager {
get { return m_manager; }
}
public CarList(Manager manager) {
m_manager = manager;
}
public void Test() {
foreach(Car car in this) {
bool ret = car.Test();
manager.Report(ret);
}
}
public void Add(TestCompletedEventHandler e) {
foreach (Car car in this) {
car.OnTestCompleted += e;
}
delegatesList.Add(e);
}
public void Add(Car car) {
foreach(Action a in delegatesList)
{
car.OnTestCompleted += a;
}
base.Add(car);
}
}
public class Car {
protected internal event TestCompletedEventHandler OnTestCompleted = null;
public bool Test() {
//...
if (OnTestCompleted != null) OnTestCompleted(this, new TestCompletedEventArgs());
}
}
public class TestCompletedEventArgs : EventArgs {
//...
}
}
using test;
Manager manager = new Manager();
Manager.Cars.Add(new Car());
manager.Cars.Add(new Car());
manager.Cars.Add(new Car());
manager.Cars.Add((sender, args) =>
{
//do whatever...
})
manager.Cars.Test();
manager.Cars.Add(new Car());