I have a list lstSubscriptionRequests on which indivisual items i am doing some sort of processing asynchronously. Then after All items are processed i have to return the updated list items. My current implementation is like
List<SubscriptionRequest> lstSubscriptionRequests = FromSomeResource();
var tsk = new List<Task>();
foreach (var oTsk in lstSubscriptionRequests.Select(objSubscriptionRequest => new Task(
() => ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(objSubscriptionRequest))))
{
oTsk.Start();
lock (tsk)
{
tsk.Add(oTsk);
}
}
Task.WaitAll(tsk.ToArray());
It's looks like some of the items after all the tasks completed are not updated.
Please let me know what correction i needed
You could accomplish this much easier. Note that using the Task constructor is not typically necessary or recommended, also mutating the state of a particular object can be difficult to follow or debug. Returning a new object that represents your desired state will allow you to enforce a minimum valid state. The following code will processes all your items and return the completed items to your client code.
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Processing {
public class MyProcessor {
public async Task<IEnumerable<Subscription>> ProcessSubscriptionRequestsAsync(IEnumerable<SubscriptionRequest> subscriptionRequests) {
var subscriptionProcessingTasks = subscriptionRequests.Select(request => ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(request)).ToArray();
return await Task.WhenAll(subscriptionProcessingTasks);
}
public async Task<Subscription> ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(SubscriptionRequest request) {
//process the request
try {
var subscription = await Context.ProcessRequest(request);
return subscription;
} catch {
//something went wrong with the request
}
}
}
public class SubscriptionRequest {
//A subcription request
}
public class Subscription {
//A completed subscription request
}
}
Update
It could help if you could exclude new Class Subscription and add the solution in your answer. i will then try it out
Hopefully the simplified before and after view will be easier to integrate. The primary difference is replacing the Parallel.ForEach with a Select to create your collection of tasks without needing to take a lock on the task list for every SubscriptionRequest, also spooling up Tasks in parallel isn't typically necessary as each one will be executing asynchronously you only gain reaching a point where all are waiting sooner, not finishing. Next each tasks is allowed to start and all are awaited at await Task.WhenAll(tasks). It will be important for you to determine what type of processing each SubscriptionRequest undergoes. For the sake of example i"ve made the assumption that each request is somehow linked to database access, i.e. storing the request, updating a user profile of sorts etc..
public class OriginalSynchronous {
public void ProcessSubscriptionRequest() {
List<SubscriptionRequest> lstSubscriptionRequests = FromSomeResource();
List<Task> tsk = new List<Task>();
Parallel.ForEach(lstSubscriptionRequests, objSubscriptionRequest => {
var oTsk =
new Task(
() => ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(objSubscriptionRequest));// update some properties after processing SubscriptionRequest
oTsk.Start();
lock (tsk) {
tsk.Add(oTsk);
}
});
Task.WaitAll(tsk.ToArray());
}
private void ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(SubscriptionRequest request) {
//modify SubscriptionRequest
}
}
public class ModifiedAsync {
public async Task ProcessSubscriptionRequest() {
var subscriptionRequests = await FromSomeResourceAsync();
var tasks = subscriptionRequests.Select(request => {
return ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(request);
}).ToArray();
await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
}
public async Task ProcessSubscriptionForASingleRecord(SubscriptionRequest request) {
//modify SubscriptionRequest
}
}
Seeking some input on a behaviour I'm noticing in my code below. This is my first attempt at async/await using Xamarin Forms and I have perused hundreds of posts, blogs and articles on the subject including the writings from Stephen Cleary on async from constructors and best practices to avoid locking. Although I am using a MVVM framework I assume my issue is more generic than that so I'll ignore it for the moment here.
If I am still missing something or there are ways to improve what I'm trying to do ... happy to listen and learn.
At a high level the logic is as follows:
Application starts and initialises
During initialisation verify database exist and if not - create the SQLite DB. Currently I force this every time to simulate a new application and pre-populate it with some sample data for development purposes
After initialisation completed load results set and display
This works most of the time but I have noticed 2 infrequent occurrences due to the async handling of the database initialisation and pre-populating:
Occasionally not all sample records created are displayed once the app started up - I assume this is because the pre-population phase has not completed when the results are loaded
Occasionally I get an error that one of the tables have not been created - I assume this is because the database initialisation has not completed when the results are loaded
The code - simplified to show the flow during initialisation and startup:
----------- VIEW / PAGE MODEL ----------------
public class MyListItemsPageModel
{
private ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem> _myListItems;
private Command loadItemsCommand;
public MyListItemsPageModel()
{
_myListItems = new ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem>();
}
public override void Init(object initData)
{
if (LoadItemsCommand.CanExecute(null))
LoadItemsCommand.Execute(null);
}
public Command LoadItemsCommand
{
get
{
return loadItemsCommand ?? (loadItemsCommand = new Command(async () => await ExecuteLoadItemsAsyncCommand(), () => { return !IsBusy; }));
}
}
public ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem> MyListItems {
get { return _myListItems ?? (_myListItems = new ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem>()); }
private set {
_myListItems = value;
}
}
private async Task ExecuteLoadItemsAsyncCommand() {
if (IsBusy)
return;
IsBusy = true;
loadItemsCommand.ChangeCanExecute();
var _results = await MySpecificDBServiceClass.LoadAllItemsAsync;
MyListItems = new ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem>(_results.OrderBy(x => x.ItemName).ToList());
IsBusy = false;
loadItemsCommand.ChangeCanExecute();
}
}
----------- DB Service Class ----------------
// THERE IS A SPECIFIC SERVICE LAYER BETWEEN THIS CLASS AND THE PAGE VIEW MODEL HANDLING THE CASTING OF TO THE SPECIFIC DATA TYPE
// public class MySpecificDBServiceClass : MyGenericDBServiceClass
public class MyGenericDBServiceClass<T>: IDataAccessService<T> where T : class, IDataModel, new()
{
public SQLiteAsyncConnection _connection = FreshIOC.Container.Resolve<ISQLiteFactory>().CreateConnection();
internal static readonly AsyncLock Mutex = new AsyncLock();
public DataServiceBase()
{
// removed this from the constructor
//if (_connection != null)
//{
// IsInitialized = DatabaseManager.CreateTableAsync(_connection);
//}
}
public Task<bool> IsInitialized { get; private set; }
public virtual async Task<List<T>> LoadAllItemsAsync()
{
// Temporary async/await initialisation code. This will be moved to the start up as per Stephen's suggestion
await DBInitialiser();
var itemList = new List<T>();
using (await Mutex.LockAsync().ConfigureAwait(false))
{
itemList = await _connection.Table<T>().ToListAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
return itemList;
}
}
----------- DB Manager Class ----------------
public class DatabaseManager
{
static double CURRENT_DATABASE_VERSION = 0.0;
static readonly AsyncLock Mutex = new AsyncLock();
private static bool IsDBInitialised = false;
private DatabaseManager() { }
public static async Task<bool> CreateTableAsync(SQLiteAsyncConnection CurrentConnection)
{
if (CurrentConnection == null || IsDBInitialised)
return IsDBInitialised;
await ProcessDBScripts(CurrentConnection);
return IsDBInitialised;
}
private static async Task ProcessDBScripts(SQLiteAsyncConnection CurrentConnection)
{
using (await Mutex.LockAsync().ConfigureAwait(false))
{
var _tasks = new List<Task>();
if (CURRENT_DATABASE_VERSION <= 0.1) // Dev DB - recreate everytime
{
_tasks.Add(CurrentConnection.DropTableAsync<Table1>());
_tasks.Add(CurrentConnection.DropTableAsync<Table2>());
await Task.WhenAll(_tasks).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
_tasks.Clear();
_tasks.Add(CurrentConnection.CreateTableAsync<Table1>());
_tasks.Add(CurrentConnection.CreateTableAsync<Table2>());
await Task.WhenAll(_tasks).ConfigureAwait(false);
_tasks.Clear();
_tasks.Add(UpgradeDBIfRequired(CurrentConnection));
await Task.WhenAll(_tasks).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
IsDBInitialised = true;
}
private static async Task UpgradeDBIfRequired(SQLiteAsyncConnection _connection)
{
await CreateSampleData();
return;
// ... rest of code not relevant at the moment
}
private static async Task CreateSampleData()
{
IDataAccessService<MyListItem> _dataService = FreshIOC.Container.Resolve<IDataAccessService<MyListItem>>();
ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem> _items = new ObservableRangeCollection<MyListItem>(); ;
_items.Add(new MyListItem() { ItemName = "Test 1", ItemCount = 14 });
_items.Add(new MyListItem() { ItemName = "Test 2", ItemCount = 9 });
_items.Add(new MyListItem() { ItemName = "Test 3", ItemCount = 5 });
await _dataService.SaveAllItemsAsync(_items).ConfigureAwait(false);
_items = null;
_dataService = null;
IDataAccessService<Sample> _dataService2 = FreshIOC.Container.Resolve<IDataAccessService<AnotherSampleTable>>();
ObservableRangeCollection<Sample> _sampleList = new ObservableRangeCollection<Sample>(); ;
_sampleList.Add(new GuestGroup() { SampleName = "ABC" });
_sampleList.Add(new GuestGroup() { SampleName = "DEF" });
await _dataService2.SaveAllItemsAsync(_sampleList).ConfigureAwait(false);
_sampleList = null;
_dataService2 = null;
}
}
In your DataServiceBase constructor, you're calling DatabaseManager.CreateTableAsync() but not awaiting it, so by the time your constructor exits, that method has not yet completed running, and given that it does very little before awaiting, it's probably barely started at that point. As you can't effectively use await in a constructor, you need to remodel things so you do that initialisation at some other point; e.g. perhaps lazily when needed.
Then you also want to not use .Result/.Wait() whenever possible, especially as you're in an async method anyway (e.g. ProcessDBScripts()), so instead of doing
var _test = CurrentConnection.DropTableAsync<MyListItem>().Result;
rather do
var _test = await CurrentConnection.DropTableAsync<MyListItem>();
You also don't need to use Task.Run() for methods that return Task types anyway. So instead of
_tasks.Add(Task.Run(() => CurrentConnection.CreateTableAsync<MyListItem>().ConfigureAwait(false)));
_tasks.Add(Task.Run(() => CurrentConnection.CreateTableAsync<AnotherSampleTable>().ConfigureAwait(false)));
just do
_tasks.Add(CurrentConnection.CreateTableAsync<MyListItem>()));
_tasks.Add(CurrentConnection.CreateTableAsync<AnotherSampleTable>()));
sellotape has correctly diagnosed the code problem: the constructor is starting an asynchronous method but nothing is (a)waiting for it to complete. A simple fix would be to add await IsInitialized; to the beginning of LoadAllItemsAsync.
However, there's also a design problem:
After initialisation completed load results set and display
That's not possible on Xamarin, or any other modern UI platform. You must load your UI immediately and synchronously. What you should do is immediately display a splash/loading page and start the asynchronous initialization work. Then, when the async init is completed, update your VM/UI with your "real" page. If you just have LoadAllItemsAsync await IsInitialized, then your app will sit there for some time showing the user zero data before it "fills in".
You may find my NotifyTask<T> type (available on NuGet) useful here if you want to show a splash/spinner instead of zero data.
I'm working with the Philips Hue, and I need to get some information from the hue bridge before I can populate my application. The requests are made via HTTP/JSON. I have no issue when I run all my code async, but when I try to break out my code so that I have a separate method to update the UI upon loading I'm getting a System.NullReferenceException on myLights. I'm assuming that's because my startUpProcedure() isn't finished yet, hence myLights has not been set. I can't seem to figure out how to wait for the startUpProcedure() to finish before I run setupUI().
To further back that up, if I just run startUpProcedure() without setupUI() I get no issues. And then if I run setupUI() from say a button click it runs just fine.
Clearly I'm missing something here. I just can't seem to find the answer.
So to succinctly put the question: How do I wait for these Async calls to finish so that I can use variables that are depended on their return values?
public sealed partial class MainPage : Page
{
public string appKey;
public string myIP;
public IEnumerable<Light> myLights;
public ILocalHueClient myClient;
public MainPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
startUpPocedure();
setupUI();
}
public async Task startUpPocedure()
{
await startUp();
await getLights();
}
public async Task startUp()
{
if (await findBridgeIP())
{
Debug.WriteLine("Bridge Found...");
//Do Actions
}
else
{
//Error!!
Debug.WriteLine("No hue found");
}
Windows.Storage.ApplicationDataContainer localSettings = Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.Current.LocalSettings;
Windows.Storage.StorageFolder localFolder = Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.Current.LocalFolder;
try {
appKey = localSettings.Values["appKey"].ToString();
Debug.WriteLine("appKey loaded: " + appKey);
//Load up
myClient = new LocalHueClient(myIP);
myClient.Initialize(appKey);
}
catch {
Debug.WriteLine("Need to register app");
}
}
async Task getLights()
{
myLights = await myClient.GetLightsAsync();
Debug.WriteLine("Light Count " + myLights.Count());
IEnumerable<string> myLightNames;
List<string> myTempList = new List<string>();
foreach (Light l in myLights)
{
myTempList.Add(l.Name);
Debug.WriteLine(l.Name);
}
myLightNames = myTempList;
comboBox_LightSelect.ItemsSource = myLightNames;
}
private void setupUI()
{
//Populate the Combo Box
IEnumerable<string> myLightNames;
List<string> myTempList = new List<string>();
foreach (Light l in myLights)
{
myTempList.Add(l.Name);
Debug.WriteLine(l.Name);
}
myLightNames = myTempList;
comboBox_LightSelect.ItemsSource = myLightNames;
}
Your startUpPocedure method in MainPage constructor returns Task almost immediately, and because you're not awaiting it, code execution goes to the next line right after that and setupUI gets called. So when your code starts to enumerate myLights collection, it's still null because startUpPocedure and therefore getLights are still running.
Problem is, you can't await asynchronous methods in a constructor, so in your case solution will be to move both startUpPocedure and setupUI to single async method, await them inside this method and call it from constructor similar to this:
public MainPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
Startup();
}
private async void Startup()
{
await startUpPocedure();
setupUI();
}
You should leave only InitializeComponent in the constructor, and move all other logic to Loaded event handler,
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/windows.ui.xaml.frameworkelement.loaded
Then you can mark that handler as async, and use await in it to await on async methods.
I have the following ViewModel structure:
App.xaml.cs
MainViewModel
DetailViewModel
I navigate between MainViewModel and DetailViewModel by this code:
navigationService.For<DetailViewModel>().Navigate();
It is the constructor of DetailViewModel:
public DetailViewModel(INavigationService navigationService)
{
GetData();
}
private async Task GetData()
{
using (var context = new MyDataContext())
{
var result = await (from data in context.Data
select data).ToListAsync();
DataList = new ObservableCollection<Data>(result);
}
}
As I don't use await when I call GetData, the constructor should return very quickly and the list should be populated later.
I experience a very slow navigation, I click the item in the MainViewModel, the GUI freezes for a second and I see the Detail when the list is populated (debug shows that the constructor is completed before the list is done).
I see a warning that says:
Because this call is not awaited, execution of the current method
continues before the call is completed.
What blocks then? What else should I set?
AFAIK, the SQLite Entity Framework provider does not support true asynchronous methods. So, the call to ToListAsync is in fact synchronous, causing your delay.
The best way to solve this is to use Task.Run with await (not ContinueWith or Execute.OnUIThread):
public DetailViewModel(INavigationService navigationService)
{
InitializeAsync();
}
private async Task InitializeAsync()
{
try
{
DataList = await Task.Run(() => GetData());
}
catch
{
// TODO: Log
}
}
private List<Data> GetData()
{
using (var context = new MyDataContext())
{
return context.Data.ToList();
}
}
Note the introduction of a try/catch; error handling here is necessary since InitializeAsync is being treated as a "top-level" asynchronous operation.
Replace your code with this one instead:
public DetailViewModel(INavigationService navigationService)
{
Task.Run(() =>
{
GetData();
});
}
private void GetData()
{
using (var context = new MyDataContext())
{
var result = await (from data in context.Data
select data).ToListAsync();
DataList = new ObservableCollection<Data>(result);
}
}
This way it works as expected:
public DetailViewModel(INavigationService navigationService)
{
Task.Run(() =>
{
GetData();
}).ContinueWith(
(x) =>
{
Execute.OnUIThread(
() => DataList = new ObservableCollection<Data>(x.Result));
});
};
}
private Task<List<Data>> GetData()
{
using (var context = new MyDataContext())
{
return await (from data in context.Data
select data).ToListAsync();
}
}
Thanks for the advices.
Summary: I would like to call an asynchronous method in a constructor. Is this possible?
Details: I have a method called getwritings() that parses JSON data. Everything works fine if I just call getwritings() in an async method and put await to left of it. However , when I create a LongListView in my page and try to populate it I'm finding that getWritings() is surprisingly returning null and the LongListView is empty.
To address this problem, I tried changing the return type of getWritings() to Task<List<Writing>> and then retrieving the result in the constructor via getWritings().Result. However, doing that ends up blocking the UI thread.
public partial class Page2 : PhoneApplicationPage
{
List<Writing> writings;
public Page2()
{
InitializeComponent();
getWritings();
}
private async void getWritings()
{
string jsonData = await JsonDataManager.GetJsonAsync("1");
JObject obj = JObject.Parse(jsonData);
JArray array = (JArray)obj["posts"];
for (int i = 0; i < array.Count; i++)
{
Writing writing = new Writing();
writing.content = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "content");
writing.date = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "date");
writing.image = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "url");
writing.summary = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "excerpt");
writing.title = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "title");
writings.Add(writing);
}
myLongList.ItemsSource = writings;
}
}
The best solution is to acknowledge the asynchronous nature of the download and design for it.
In other words, decide what your application should look like while the data is downloading. Have the page constructor set up that view, and start the download. When the download completes update the page to display the data.
I have a blog post on asynchronous constructors that you may find useful. Also, some MSDN articles; one on asynchronous data-binding (if you're using MVVM) and another on asynchronous best practices (i.e., you should avoid async void).
You can also do just like this:
Task.Run(() => this.FunctionAsync()).Wait();
Note: Be careful about thread blocking!
I'd like to share a pattern that I've been using to solve these kinds of problems. It works rather well I think. Of course, it only works if you have control over what calls the constructor.
public class MyClass
{
public static async Task<MyClass> Create()
{
var myClass = new MyClass();
await myClass.Initialize();
return myClass;
}
private MyClass()
{
}
private async Task Initialize()
{
await Task.Delay(1000); // Do whatever asynchronous work you need to do
}
}
Basically what we do is we make the constructor private and make our own public static async method that is responsible for creating an instance of MyClass. By making the constructor private and keeping the static method within the same class we have made sure that no one could "accidentally" create an instance of this class without calling the proper initialization methods.
All the logic around the creation of the object is still contained within the class (just within a static method).
var myClass1 = new MyClass() // Cannot be done, the constructor is private
var myClass2 = MyClass.Create() // Returns a Task that promises an instance of MyClass once it's finished
var myClass3 = await MyClass.Create() // asynchronously creates and initializes an instance of MyClass
Implemented on the current scenario it would look something like:
public partial class Page2 : PhoneApplicationPage
{
public static async Task<Page2> Create()
{
var page = new Page2();
await page.getWritings();
return page;
}
List<Writing> writings;
private Page2()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private async Task getWritings()
{
string jsonData = await JsonDataManager.GetJsonAsync("1");
JObject obj = JObject.Parse(jsonData);
JArray array = (JArray)obj["posts"];
for (int i = 0; i < array.Count; i++)
{
Writing writing = new Writing();
writing.content = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "content");
writing.date = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "date");
writing.image = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "url");
writing.summary = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "excerpt");
writing.title = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "title");
writings.Add(writing);
}
myLongList.ItemsSource = writings;
}
}
Instead of doing
var page = new Page2();
you would be using:
var page = await Page2.Create();
A quick way to execute some time-consuming operation in any constructor is by creating an action and run them asynchronously.
new Action( async() => await InitializeThingsAsync())();
Running this piece of code will neither block your UI nor leave you with any loose threads. And if you need to update any UI (considering you are not using MVVM approach), you can use the Dispatcher to do so as many have suggested.
A Note: This option only provides you a way to start an execution of a method from the constructor if you don't have any init or onload or navigated overrides. Most likely this will keep on running even after the construction has been completed. Hence the result of this method call may NOT be available in the constructor itself.
My preferred approach:
// caution: fire and forget
Task.Run(async () => await someAsyncFunc());
Try to replace this:
myLongList.ItemsSource = writings;
with this
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => myLongList.ItemsSource = writings);
To put it simply, referring to Stephen Cleary https://stackoverflow.com/a/23051370/267000
your page on creation should create tasks in constructor and you should declare those tasks as class members or put it in your task pool.
Your data are fetched during these tasks, but these tasks should awaited in the code i.e. on some UI manipulations, i.e. Ok Click etc.
I developped such apps in WP, we had a whole bunch of tasks created on start.
You could try AsyncMVVM.
Page2.xaml:
<PhoneApplicationPage x:Class="Page2"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation">
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding Writings}" />
</PhoneApplicationPage>
Page2.xaml.cs:
public partial class Page2
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new ViewModel2();
}
ViewModel2.cs:
public class ViewModel2: AsyncBindableBase
{
public IEnumerable<Writing> Writings
{
get { return Property.Get(GetWritingsAsync); }
}
private async Task<IEnumerable<Writing>> GetWritingsAsync()
{
string jsonData = await JsonDataManager.GetJsonAsync("1");
JObject obj = JObject.Parse(jsonData);
JArray array = (JArray)obj["posts"];
for (int i = 0; i < array.Count; i++)
{
Writing writing = new Writing();
writing.content = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "content");
writing.date = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "date");
writing.image = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "url");
writing.summary = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "excerpt");
writing.title = JsonDataManager.JsonParse(array, i, "title");
yield return writing;
}
}
}
Don't ever call .Wait() or .Result as this is going to lock your app.
Don't spin up a new Task either, just call the ContinueWith
public class myClass
{
public myClass
{
GetMessageAsync.ContinueWith(GetResultAsync);
}
async Task<string> GetMessageAsync()
{
return await Service.GetMessageFromAPI();
}
private async Task GetResultAsync(Task<string> resultTask)
{
if (resultTask.IsFaulted)
{
Log(resultTask.Exception);
}
eles
{
//do what ever you need from the result
}
}
}
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/asynchronous-programming-patterns/consuming-the-task-based-asynchronous-pattern
A little late to the party, but I think many are struggling with this...
I've been searching for this as well. And to get your method/action running async without waiting or blocking the thread, you'll need to queue it via the SynchronizationContext, so I came up with this solution:
I've made a helper-class for it.
public static class ASyncHelper
{
public static void RunAsync(Func<Task> func)
{
var context = SynchronizationContext.Current;
// you don't want to run it on a threadpool. So if it is null,
// you're not on a UI thread.
if (context == null)
throw new NotSupportedException(
"The current thread doesn't have a SynchronizationContext");
// post an Action as async and await the function in it.
context.Post(new SendOrPostCallback(async state => await func()), null);
}
public static void RunAsync<T>(Func<T, Task> func, T argument)
{
var context = SynchronizationContext.Current;
// you don't want to run it on a threadpool. So if it is null,
// you're not on a UI thread.
if (context == null)
throw new NotSupportedException(
"The current thread doesn't have a SynchronizationContext");
// post an Action as async and await the function in it.
context.Post(new SendOrPostCallback(async state => await func((T)state)), argument);
}
}
Usage/Example:
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private async Task Initialize()
{
// replace code here...
await Task.Delay(1000);
}
private async Task Run(string myString)
{
// replace code here...
await Task.Delay(1000);
}
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
// you don't have to await nothing.. (the thread must be running)
ASyncHelper.RunAsync(Initialize);
ASyncHelper.RunAsync(Run, "test");
// In your case
ASyncHelper.RunAsync(getWritings);
}
}
This works for Windows.Forms and WPF
In order to use async within the constructor and ensure the data is available when you instantiate the class, you can use this simple pattern:
class FooClass : IFooAsync
{
FooClass
{
this.FooAsync = InitFooTask();
}
public Task FooAsync { get; }
private async Task InitFooTask()
{
await Task.Delay(5000);
}
}
The interface:
public interface IFooAsync
{
Task FooAsync { get; }
}
The usage:
FooClass foo = new FooClass();
if (foo is IFooAsync)
await foo.FooAsync;
Brian Lagunas has shown a solution that I really like. More info his youtube video
Solution:
Add a TaskExtensions method
public static class TaskExtensions
{
public static async void Await(this Task task, Action completedCallback = null ,Action<Exception> errorCallBack = null )
{
try
{
await task;
completedCallback?.Invoke();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
errorCallBack?.Invoke(e);
}
}
}
Usage:
public class MyClass
{
public MyClass()
{
DoSomething().Await();
// DoSomething().Await(Completed, HandleError);
}
async Task DoSomething()
{
await Task.Delay(3000);
//Some works here
//throw new Exception("Thrown in task");
}
private void Completed()
{
//some thing;
}
private void HandleError(Exception ex)
{
//handle error
}
}
The answer is simple, If you are developing an UWP app, then add the async function to the Page_Loaded method of the page.
if you want it to wait task to be done you can improve madlars codes like below. (I tried on .net core 3.1 it worked )
var taskVar = Task.Run(async () => await someAsyncFunc());
taskVar.Wait();
You could put the async calls in a separate method and call that method in the constructor.
Although, this may lead to a situation where some variable values not being available at the time you expect them.
public NewTravelPageVM(){
GetVenues();
}
async void GetVenues(){
var locator = CrossGeolocator.Current;
var position = await locator.GetPositionAsync();
Venues = await Venue.GetVenues(position.Latitude, position.Longitude);
}