I have an output data class with a DateTime variable. I want to clear that to a null value in a loader class but the compiler complains with:
Cannot convert null to 'System.Data.Time' because it is a non-nullable value type.
I understand that, but if I change the type to DateTime? creating the nullable type wrapper I get:
No overload for method 'ToString' takes '1' arguments
I have an output line that reads.
ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd")
So the question is, when I set the DateTime as nullable, how do I get around the fact that is no longer behaves like a DateTime that has the formatted ToString available?
Use its Value property, like so:
DateTime? dt = DateTime.Now; // or whatever
MessageBox.Show(dt.Value.ToString(...));
try
ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE.Value.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd")
You need to access the actual value using the 'Value' property of the nullable type.
You should make sure 'Value' contains something first testing the ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE.HasValue property.
HTH
Whenever you wrap something Nullable<> (which is what you're doing with DateTime?), you need to do obj.Value.ToString().
You should write:
ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE.Value.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd")
.NET doesn't have a method out of the box for this. You'd need to have a helper method like:
public string Format(DateTime? date, string format)
{
if (date == null)
return string.Empty;
return date.Value.ToString(format);
}
Or even better, an extension method for DateTime?:
public static class DateTimeExtensionMethods
{
public static string ToString(this DateTime? date, string format)
{
if (date == null)
return string.Empty;
return date.Value.ToString(format);
}
}
Then to use your extension method, just use the code you have in your question and make sure the namespace of the DateTimeExtensionMethods is imported into your class.
are you looking for
DateTime? dt = new DateTime();
or
Nullable<DateTime> dt = new DateTime();
ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE.Value.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd");
You would have to use
dt.HasValue ? dt.Value.ToString("...") : dt.ToString();
This is because Nullable<T> is a proper type in its own right whose ToString() method is already nicely done, as it handles the null case well. But to get to the underlying non-nullable object you have to use the Value property. But then you'll have to check for null (or HasValue) yourself.
Have you looked at setting the DateTime to DataTime.MinValue?
Suggested here http://dotnetperls.com/datetime-null-minvalue
DateTime? date = getSomeDate();
if (date != null) {
date.Value.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd");
}
string strDate = string.Empty;
if(ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE != null)
{
strDate = ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE.Value.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd");
}
or you can use null collacing operator
DateTime newDate = ACCOUNT_ESTABLISHED_DATE ?? new Date();
newDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd");
Related
I'm reading back a DateTime? value from my view. Now I check to see if the NextUpdate DateTime? HasValue and if so convert that time to UTC.
From reading up on this it seems I need to use a null coalescing operator but my assignment tells me that System.NUllable does not contain a definition for ToUniversalTime() when using that operator.
I've searched on SO for a similar question but no luck on that.
Question:
How can I convert a null DateTime value to UTC?
Code:
I'm simply checking if the DateTime? has a value, and if so convert that DateTie to UTC -
if (escalation.NextUpdate.HasValue)
{
escalation.NextUpdate = escalation.NextUpdate ?? escalation.NextUpdate.ToUniversalTime();
}
else
{
escalation.NextUpdate = null;
}
My NextUpdate property in the model:
public DateTime? NextUpdate { get; set; }
Your code is wrong in more than one way.
The ?? operator returns the left side if it is not null, otherwise the right side.
Since you already checked that escalation.NextUpdate.HasValue is true, the left side is not null and you assign the same date again (without converting to UTC).
Nullable<DateTime> does not declare ToUniversalTime(), you need to do that on the value.
So the final code should look like this:
if (escalation.NextUpdate.HasValue)
escalation.NextUpdate = escalation.NextUpdate.Value.ToUniversalTime();
or with C#6
escalation.NextUpdate = escalation.NextUpdate?.ToUniversalTime();
There is no need for the else branch as in that case it would be null anyway.
if you are using c#6 then its very simple
escalation.NextUpdate?.ToUniversalTime();
this translates as if NextUpdate is not null call ToUniversalTime() else return null
if you can't use c#6 then inline if is probably your best bet
escalation.NextUpdate.HasValue ? (DateTime?)escalation.NextUpdate.Value.ToUniversalTime():null;
this is basically the same as your full if baring you've missed out the Value property of the nullable and corrects your use of the ?? operator
I am aware of the standard procedure for displaying a DateTime in a custom format, like so:
MessageBox.Show(dateSent.ToString("dd/MM/yyyy hh:mm:ss"));
However, when I change the variable from a DateTime to a DateTime? to accept null values, I lose the definition for the ToString(string) overload. I need to use DateTime? as I am reading from a database which potentially has null values - if the field in the database has a null value, then I need to assign the variable a null value too.
So I have two questions:
1) Out of curiosity, does anyone know if there is a reason why DateTime? does not contain an overload for ToString(string)?
2) Could anyone suggest an alternative method for what I am trying to achieve?
DateTime? is syntactic sugar for Nullable<DateTime> and that's why it don't have ToString(format) overload.
However, you can access underlying DateTime struct using Value property. But before that use HasValue to check, if the value exists.
MessageBox.Show(dateSent.HasValue ? dateSent.Value.ToString("dd/MM/yyyy hh:mm:ss") : string.Empty)
Instead of having to manually perform a null check every time, you can write an extension method.
public static string ToStringFormat(this DateTime? dt, string format)
{
if(dt.HasValue)
return dt.Value.ToString(format);
else
return "";
}
And use it like this (with whatever string format you want)
Console.WriteLine(myNullableDateTime.ToStringFormat("dd/MM/yyyy hh:mm:ss"));
You can still use
variableName.Value.ToString(customFormat);
DateTime? testDate = (DateTime?)arrayOfObjects[dateObject];
Does that code look ok? I attempted to use the as operator but I got the 'non-nullable' error. What I'm trying to say is that the object I'm choosing from the array is either DateTime or a null DateTime but either can be assigned to testDate.
Doesn't feel right doing it this way, I think I'm missing something obvious.
EDIT: I suppose it's the same as the way I could've adapted the as in the following way:
DateTime? testDate = arrayOfObjects[dateObject] as DateTime?;
Is either line of code the best way of handling potential nulls?
Is either line of code the best way of handling potential nulls?
The second form will silently result in null when the array contains something other than a DateTime. That seems a good reason to use the first.
To the basic question:
am I missing something or is this the typical (or at least an acceptable) approach
It is acceptable but a little obscure maybe, because it is 'hiding' an unboxing operation.
You could use:
DateTime? testDate = null;
if (arrayOfObjects[dateObject] != null)
testDate = (DateTime) arrayOfObjects[dateObject]; // no '?'
But that's verbose. And this particular problem doesn't lend itself well to the conditional operator (?:)
So I would stick with your first version.
DateTime? is a shorter form for another struct
Nullable<DateTime> {
bool HasValue;
DateTime Value;
}
You will never get this type from your DB, so the first line will never cast correctly. The database will provide you with a DateTime value stored in an object variable. Or a null (untyped).
DateTime is a struct, so "as" operator won't work for it. So, simply check for null as follows:
DateTime? testDate = arrayOfObjects[dateObject] == null ? (DateTime?) null : (DateTime)arrayOfObjects[dateObject];
A better approach would be to do something like:
if(arrayOfObjects[dateObject] != null && arrayOfObjects[dateObject] is DateTime)
{
DateTime testDate = (DateTime)arrayOfObjects[dateObject];
// logic here
}
or something like:
DateTime? testDate = null;
if(arrayOfObjects[dateObject] is DateTime)
{
testDate = (DateTime)arrayOfObjects[dateObject];
}
else if (arrayOfObjects[dateObject] is Nullable<DateTime>)
{
testDate = (Nullable<DateTime>)arrayOfObjects[dateObject];
}
Try using Array.ConvertAll method. Below is roughly how it is implemented:
DateTime?[] dates = Array.ConvertAll<object, DateTime?>arrayOfObjects,DateTime);
Note: This is just a rough idea. you can correct it to suit your self.
I would declare an empty String variable like this:
string myString = string.Empty;
Is there an equivalent for a 'DateTime' variable ?
Update :
The problem is I use this 'DateTime' as a parameter for a 'StoredProcedure' in SQL.
E.g:
DateTime? someDate = null;
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("#SurgeryDate", someDate);
When I run this code an exception is catched telling me the 'StoredProcedure' expected a '#SurgeryDate' parameter.
But i provided it.
Any idea why?
Since DateTime is a value type you cannot assign null to it, but exactly for these cases (absence of a value) Nullable<T> was introduced - use a nullable DateTime instead:
DateTime? myTime = null;
No. You have 2 options:
DateTime date = DateTime.MinValue;
This works when you need to do something every X amount of time (since you will always be over MinValue) but can actually cause subtle errors (such as using some operators w/o first checking if you are not MinValue) if you are not careful.
And you can use Nullable:
DateTime? date = null;
Which is nice and avoids most issues while introducing only 1 or 2.
It really depends on what you are trying to achieve.
You can set a DateTime variable to be '1/1/0001 00:00:00' but the variable itself cannot be null. To get this MinTime use:
DateTime variableName = DateTime.MinValue;
You may want to use a nullable datetime. Datetime? someDate = null;
You may find instances of people using DateTime.Max or DateTime.Min in such instances, but I highly doubt you want to do that. It leads to bugs with edge cases, code that's harder to read, etc.
The method you used (AddWithValue) doesn't convert null values to database nulls. You should use DBNull.Value instead:
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue(
"#SurgeryDate",
someDate == null ? DBNull.Value : (object)someDate
);
This will pass the someDate value if it is not null, or DBNull.Value otherwise. In this case correct value will be passed to the database.
Either:
DateTime dt = new DateTime();
or
DateTime dt = default(DateTime);
If you set the date to
DateTime dNewDate = new DateTime();
The value is set to {1/1/0001 12:00:00 AM}
Option 1: Use a nullable DateTime?
Option 2: Use DateTime.MinValue
Personally, I'd prefer option 1.
A string is a sequence of characters. So it makes sense to have an empty string, which is just an empty sequence of characters.
But DateTime is just a single value, so it's doesn't make sense to talk about an “empty” DateTime.
If you want to represent the concept of “no value”, that's represented as null in .Net. And if you want to use that with value types, you need to explicitly make them nullable. That means either using Nullable<DateTime>, or the equivalent DateTime?.
DateTime (just like all value types) also has a default value, that's assigned to uninitialized fields and you can also get it by new DateTime() or default(DateTime). But you probably don't want to use it, since it represents valid date: 1.1.0001 0:00:00.
There's no such thing as an empty date per se, do you mean something like:
DateTime? myDateTime = null;
The .addwithvalue needs dbnull.
You could do something like this:
DateTime? someDate = null;
//...
if (someDate == null)
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("#SurgeryDate", DBnull.value);
or use a method extension...
public static class Extensions
{
public static SqlParameter AddWithNullValue(this SqlParameterCollection collection, string parameterName, object value)
{
if (value == null)
return collection.AddWithValue(parameterName, DBNull.Value);
else
return collection.AddWithValue(parameterName, value);
}
}
This will work for null able dateTime parameter
. .
SearchUsingDate(DateTime? StartDate, DateTime? EndDate){
DateTime LastDate;
if (EndDate != null)
{
LastDate = (DateTime)EndDate;
LastDate = LastDate.AddDays(1);
EndDate = LastDate;
}
}
Am just trying to understand why this exception throws.
Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.DateTime?' to 'System.DateTime'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)
This is what am trying to do
story.BroadcastOn is a date time value am getting from database (eg: 23/03/2012 1:56 Pm).
Am trying to convert the time from 12 to 24 hrs format,this is what i was trying to do
DateTime testconverttime = story.BroadcastOn;`//this is where it throws exception
so i have to use the parse to get rid of this like below to solve my issue but it doesn't make sense to me
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(story.BroadcastOn.ToString()))
{
DateTime localTime = story.BroadcastOn.Value;//Thanks all for the great suggestion.
converttime = localTime.ToString("dd/MMM/yyyy HH:mm ", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
}
already i converted my 12 hrs to 24hrs but trying to understand the exception,some one will give me an explanation please.
DateTime testconverttime = story.BroadcastOn.Value;
It's a nullable type (can have the null state also)
A nullable value type (DateTime is a value type), has the concept of the null value (no value). So if for example a column of datetime in database has nulls, then you can use Nullable<DateTime> or in short DateTime? to store the values which comes from that column.
About DateTime.ToString() and String.ToDateTime(): this is called yo-yo programming. You probably saw with Debuger that there is a representation of valid DateTime, which was giving by calling ToString(), but, in future, don't try to cast a type to another type via this yo-yo technique.
Try this, assuming the nullable type has a value:
DateTime testconverttime = story.BroadcastOn.Value;
DateTime? and DateTime are not the same type. DateTime? is the nullable version of the DateTime type.
You should check whether it's null, and then either cast or retrieve the value of the nullable:
if (story.BroadcastOn.HasValue) {
var broadcastOn = story.BroadcastOn.Value;
// do stuff with broadcastOn
} else {
// handle null BroadcastOn
}
or
if (story.BroadcastOn != null) {
var broadcastOn = (DateTime) story.BroadcastOn;
// do stuff with broadcastOn
} else {
// handle null BroadcastOn
}
Using .HasValue or comparing with null, and using .Value and casting to the non-nullable type should be equivalent. You can also use the ?? operator.
Try casting it as a DateTime, like so:
DateTime testconverttime = (DateTime)story.BroadcastOn
System.DateTime? and System.DateTime are 2 different types. You need to use story.BroadcastOn.Value if you are sure if it is not null.
DateTime? and DateTime are not the same type so you can not implicitly assign DateTime? to DateTime
You need to either explicitly cast it or assign the value via the Value property of DateTime. However, if BroadcastOn is null, either method will throw an exception.
If you don't know BroadcastOn is not null then you best option to is use the null-coalescing operator:
DateTime dt = story.BroadcastOn ?? default(DateTime);