VS 2008
I have this code snippet I found on a VB website.
But for some reason I am having trouble converting it to C#.
My.Computer.Network.IsAvailable
Many thanks,
using System.Net.NetworkInformation;
internal class Program
{
private static void Main()
{
NetworkInterface.GetIsNetworkAvailable();
}
}
Yes, garethm is right, this class (Network) is from a VB.NET library - you need to reference the Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly if using in a C# project.
Microsoft.VisualBasic.Devices.Network n = new Microsoft.VisualBasic.Devices.Network();
if (n.IsAvailable)
{
// do stuff
}
Works for me - my network is available :).
As far as how Network relates to NetworkInterface class, it depends on what you want to do next. For instance, Network has such nice stuff as NetworkAvailabilityChanged event, and UploadFile method. On the other hand, NetworkInterface can give you a bunch of specific technical info such as speed or whether it supports multicast.
BTW, there is nothing undocumented about using a class from Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace - it's the core idea behind .NET that you can use classes from assemblies regardless of the language they were written in.
What I generally do is write a small app, then load then project in Reflector and disassemble it.
but you can use this class:
System.Net.NetworkInformation.NetworkChange.NetworkAddressChanged
Isn't the whole "My" thing from a VB library?
This appears to work. It's probably very undocumented usage though:
Microsoft.VisualBasic.Devices.Network net = new Microsoft.VisualBasic.Devices.Network();
if (net.IsAvailable)
{
Text = "Network is available";
}
else
{
Text = "Network unavailable";
}
Note that I needed to add a reference to Microsoft.VisualBasic to my project.
Related
I am trying to compile code at runtime using C#, Unity and this tutorial. I've got everything running, but want to be able to use UnityEngine methods like Debug.Log(); in the pseudo-code. In order to do so, I wrote using UnityEngine; in it, but got the following error:
The type or namespace name "UnityEngine" could not be found. Are you missing an assembly reference?
How do I solve this?
I have tried adding a reference of UnityEngine to CompilerParameters.ReferencedAssemblies like this:
//parameters is of type CompilerParameters
parameters.ReferencedAssemblies.Add("UnityEngine.dll");
but that gives me the following error:
Metadata file UnityEngine.dll could not be found.
This is the most relevant part of my code, but you won't be able to reproduce it like that. Instead, get the code from the above mentioned tutorial.
public void Compile()
{
string code = #"
using UnityEngine;
namespace First
{
public class Program
{
public static void Main()
{
" + "Debug.Log(\"Test!\");" + #"
}
}
}
";
CSharpCodeProvider provider = new CSharpCodeProvider();
CompilerParameters parameters = new CompilerParameters();
parameters.ReferencedAssemblies.Add("UnityEngine.dll");
}
Since I am inexperienced with C#, and only use it with Unity, I don't know what a .dll file is and am clueless about where to start when fixing this. I am thankful for any kind of help!
You are supposed to put the path of the UnityEngine.dll there, not just UnityEngine.dll, unless it exists in the working directory, which is highly unlikely.
According to this answer, you can easily find UnityEngine.dll (and other dlls as well) in your file system. It is under Editor\Data\Managed, so you should write:
parameters.ReferencedAssemblies.Add(#"C:\\path\to\your\unity\installation\Editor\Data\Managed\UnityEngine.dll");
I tried some of the open source solutions, but couldn't find a solution which worked on all 3 platforms. Finally I bought this asset, which works without problems on Windows, Mac and Linux: https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/integration/dynamic-c-82084 The documentation and support is very good. For example I had a problem that I couldn't compile a class which uses the Unity Screen class, and the support told me that I had to include the UnityEngine.CoreModule.dll in the settings page of the asset, which solved the problem.
PS: I don't get money for this recommendation, I'm just a happy user of the asset.
I have an old line of c# code that looks basically like this:
foo.set_Parent(parent);
It has compiled fine for years. Now in VS2015 I get the error:
CS0571 'Foo.Parent.set': cannot explicitly call operator or accessor
So I can rewrite the line as:
foo.Parent=parent;
This builds fine in VS2015, but in VS2013 it gives the error:
'Foo.Parent' is not supported by the language; try directly calling
accessor methods 'Foo.get_Parent()' or Foo.set_Parent(Foo)'
So the simple fix is to simply ifdef these two lines based upon which version of the compiler is running. But how do you detect which version of the compiler is executing?
And for the record, no, I can't just dictate that everyone on the team simultaneously upgrades to VS2015.
Additional info -
For everyone smelling a rat, I'll go ahead and drag out the ugly truth, although I don't think it will change much of anything. The class Foo is from an ancient Borland assembly that is all bound up in Delphi (and yes, we're migrating away but not there yet). So the actual code, that compiles up to VS2013, looks like this:
using Borland.Vcl;
using RepGen;
using SnapReportsForm;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace MigrantCOM {
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("48245BA3-736B-4F98-BDC5-AD86F77E39F4")]
[ProgId("MigrantCOM.Exports")]
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.AutoDual)]
public class MigrantCLRExports { // : MarshalByRefObject
public string Test(string s) { return s+s; }
}
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("1154D364-B588-4C31-88B9-141072303117")]
[ProgId("MigrantCOM.SnapRepCOM")]
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.AutoDual)]
public class SnapRepCOM {
TRepGen repGen;
TStringList snapRefs=new TStringList();
TForm parent=new TForm(null);
TMemo designerMemo;
List<TReference> references=new List<TReference>();
TRunAsSnapContext runAsSnapContext=new TRunAsSnapContext();
public SnapRepCOM() {
designerMemo=new TMemo(parent); designerMemo.set_Parent(parent);
...
}
So the class being instantiated is Borland.Vcl.TMemo which is part of the old Delphi assembly.
I'm leaving this as an answer, linking an image will fit better here than in a comment.
So if you want to use VS 2015 but still use the same good ol' version of the C# language that worked for years, you can configure your project to target a specific version:
This adds <LangVersion>5</LangVersion> in the csproj.
I'm creating a program that uses the CodeProject CoreAudioApi (pretty popular framework for manipulating audio), but the problem is the CoreAudioApi uses system calls that aren't available in any versions of Windows earlier than Vista. If I run a program with CoreAudioApi compiled with it (using a using statement as normal), the program will crash on anything earlier than Vista.
I've created this function to get the version number of the current environment:
win_version = Environment.OSVersion.Version.Major;
That returns the major version number I need. '6' is Vista/7, anything else is not, which is all I need to determine. Utilizing this, I need to determine whether or not to include the CoreAudioApi namespace if the OS is over or equal to '6'. From research, usings need to be compiled with the program, but I've also read about something called Reflection - which might be what I need.
Once I get the CoreAudioApi namespace using'd (sorry for the lack of terminology), the rest is easy. How can I do this?
TL;DR
I need some form of code that would effectively do this:
using System;
using System.Text;
//etc
if(currentWindowsVersion>=6) using CoreAudioApi;
Except control structures won't work outside of a class, and all namespaces are compiled with the program, not controlled individually.
Thanks!
EDIT: So far, I'm using this to load the CoreAudioApi namespace as a compiled assembly:
if(win_version>=6){
CoreAudioApi = Assembly.LoadFrom("CoreAudio.dll");
CoreAudioApi.GetLoadedModules();
CoreAudioApi.GetTypes();
MessageBox.Show("Loaded CoreAudioApi");
}
From here, what I need to do is actually use the types, and methods from the API. My code that works on Windows Vista/7 is this:
public static MMDeviceEnumerator devEnum;
public static MMDevice defaultDevice;
//later in a mute method:
defaultDevice.AudioEndpointVolume.Mute = true/false;
I don't even really need devEnum AFAIK, so really the only important lines are the last two (besides the comment).
I've just tried the following:
Create a new console application project
Add the CoreAudioApi project from CodeProject to the solution
Add a project reference to CoreAudioApi in my console app
Create the following classes:
interface IAudio { void SetVolume(float level); }
class XpAudio : IAudio {
public void SetVolume(float level) {
// I do nothing, but this is where your old-style code would go
}
}
class VistaAudio : IAudio {
public void SetVolume(float level) {
MMDeviceEnumerator devEnum = new MMDeviceEnumerator();
MMDevice defaultDevice = devEnum
.GetDefaultAudioEndpoint(EDataFlow.eRender, ERole.eMultimedia);
defaultDevice.AudioEndpointVolume.MasterVolumeLevel = level;
}
}
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
IAudio setter = Environment.OSVersion.Version.Major >= 6
? (IAudio)new VistaAudio()
: (IAudio)new XpAudio();
float val = float.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
setter.SetVolume(val);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
This runs on both my server (~ Windows 7) and local (Windows XP) machines. On my XP machine it'll happily take in a value and ignore it; on my server, it throws an exception, (presumably because I don't have a sound output). If I make my XP machine run the CoreAudioApi, I get an exception when I input a value, not before.
The question is, what are you doing differently to make your application break? Are you using CoreAudioApi code at startup?
EDIT: After seeing your edit, if you do this, you shouldn't need to mess about with Assembly.LoadFrom at all. The framework should dynamically load that assembly if (and only if) and when it needs to.
COREAUDIOAPI.dll does not work on XP or earlier, because they cant handle MMDEVICE API (Device Enumeration). I dont know about Vista.
I was under the impression Mono's compiler was usable in Microsoft.NET
edit: updated blog posting here that I originally missed that explains some of it (is consistent with Justin's answers)
I created a simple class to try to use it
[TestFixture]
class Class1
{
[Test]
public void EXPR()
{
Evaluator.Run("using System;");
int sum = (int)Evaluator.Evaluate("1+2");
}
}
And a project in Visual Studio 2010 that references C:\Program Files (x86)\Mono-2.10.1\lib\mono\4.0\Mono.CSharp.dll.
However when I try to run this task I get the following exception, thrown at the Evaluator.Run call:
System.TypeInitializationException was unhandled by user code
Message=The type initializer for 'Mono.CSharp.Evaluator' threw an exception.
Source=Mono.CSharp
TypeName=Mono.CSharp.Evaluator
StackTrace:
at Mono.CSharp.Evaluator.Run(String statement)
at Experiments.Class1.EXPR() in W:\Experiments\Class1.cs:line 16
InnerException: System.TypeLoadException
Message=Method 'Mono.CSharp.Location.ToString()' is security transparent, but is a member of a security critical type.
Source=Mono.CSharp
TypeName=Mono.CSharp.Location.ToString()
StackTrace:
at Mono.CSharp.Evaluator..cctor()
InnerException:
A google confirms one other person asking this question but no answer. I tried to start reading the microsoft article on security transparent code but got confused quite quickly. Would someone be able to suggest a quick workaround to allow me to use this? And possibly summarise the security implications, if any, to me (in the context of my situation - in the future I hope to package it with a thick client application, to be used both internally and by end-users)
It has worked under .NET since April of last year.
Small point but I notice you are missing a semi-colon in your expression for sum.
int sum = (int)Evaluator.Evaluate("1+2;");
I only have Mono 2.11 (from git) at the moment and they have changed to using a multi-instance version of the compiler instead of the static version. So, my code looks a little different:
using System;
using Mono.CSharp;
namespace REPLtest
{
class MainClass
{
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
var r = new Report (new ConsoleReportPrinter ());
var cmd = new CommandLineParser (r);
var settings = cmd.ParseArguments (args);
if (settings == null || r.Errors > 0)
Environment.Exit (1);
var evaluator = new Evaluator (settings, r);
evaluator.Run("using System;");
int sum = (int) evaluator.Evaluate("1+2;");
Console.WriteLine ("The sum of 1 + 2 is {0}", sum);
}
}
}
EDIT: I guess I should confirm that I did in fact successfully execute this on .NET 4 (using Visual C# Express 2010 on Windows XP)
EDIT AGAIN: If you have Visual Studio, you can download the latest version of Mono.CSharp and compile it yourself. There is a .sln (solution file) included with the source so you can build it on Windows without Mono. The resulting assembly would run the code above. Miguel has a post explaining the new Mono.CSharp here.
FINAL EDIT: I uploaded the compiled Mono.CSharp.dll assembly that I actually used here. Include it as a reference to compile the code above.
It looks like this is a bug in Mono.
.NET 4 abandoned Code Access Security but kept the concept of Security Transparent Code. In a nutshell, low-level code that does stuff, like call unmanaged code, must be "security critical". Application level code is marked "transparent". "Transparent" code cannot call into "security critical" code.
It sounds like Mono.CSharp.Location.ToString() needs to be marked with the [SecuritySafeCritical] attribute if you want the Mono 2.10 code to work with .NET 4. Maybe even better would be marking all of Mono.CSharp as SecuritySafeCritical.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.security.securitycriticalattribute.aspx
PS. Sorry to have multiple answers for one question. After I realized that 2.11 would work, I became more curious about what the error with 2.10 meant. I cannot really combine this answer with the others.
I decided I should have kept the code more like the question but I did not want to overwrite my previous answer:
The code below works with version 2.11 of Mono.CSharp (available here including a solution file for building with Visual Studio/.NET). It was tested with .NET 4 on Windows XP. I do not have access to Mono 2.10 at the moment.
[TestFixture]
class Class1
{
private Evaluator evaluator;
public Class1()
{
var report = new Report(new ConsoleReportPrinter());
evaluator = new Evaluator(new CompilerSettings(), report);
}
[Test]
public void EXPR()
{
evaluator.Run("using System;");
int sum = (int)evaluator.Evaluate("1+2;");
}
}
EDIT: I uploaded the Mono.CSharp.dll assembly that I actually used here. Include it as a reference to compile the code above.
IronRuby and VS2010 noob question:
I'm trying to do a spike to test the feasibility of interop between a C# project and an existing RubyGem rather than re-invent that particular wheel in .net. I've downloaded and installed IronRuby and the RubyGems package, as well as the gem I'd ultimately like to use.
Running .rb files or working in the iirb Ruby console is without problems. I can load the both the RubyGems package, and the gem itself and use it, so, at least for that use case, my environment is set up correctly.
However, when I try to do the same sort of thing from within a C# (4.0) console app, it complains about the very first line:
require 'RubyGems'
With the error:
no such file to load -- rubygems
My Console app looks like this:
using System;
using IronRuby;
namespace RubyInteropSpike
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var runtime = Ruby.CreateRuntime();
var scope = runtime.ExecuteFile("test.rb");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
Removing the dependencies and just doing some basic self-contained Ruby stuff works fine, but including any kind of 'requires' statement seems to cause it to fail.
I'm hoping that I just need to pass some additional information (paths, etc) to the ruby runtime when I create it, and really hoping that this isn't some kind of limitation, because that would make me sad.
Short answer: Yes, this will work how you want it to.You need to use the engine's SetSearchPaths method to do what you wish.
A more complete example
(Assumes you loaded your IronRuby to C:\IronRubyRC2 as the root install dir)
var engine = IronRuby.Ruby.CreateEngine();
engine.SetSearchPaths(new[] {
#"C:\IronRubyRC2\Lib\ironruby",
#"C:\IronRubyRC2\Lib\ruby\1.8",
#"C:\IronRubyRC2\Lib\ruby\site_ruby\1.8"
});
engine.Execute("require 'rubygems'"); // without SetSearchPaths, you get a LoadError
/*
engine.Execute("require 'restclient'"); // install through igem, then check with igem list
engine.Execute("puts RestClient.get('http://localhost/').body");
*/
Console.ReadKey();