I'm creating a text-to-speech application. it's an ASP.NET application that makes use of the System.Speech namespace to convert some text to .wav audio format.
the thing is that I want to be able to install multiple Nuance voices on the server to make use of them in my application.
is there any website hosting provider (like godaddy.com) that can allow a web application owner to install programs on their system ? is there another way to solve this ?
You can use a dedicated server from many ISP's including GoDaddy.com. This will basically be your own server, you can install anything you want. However, this will be pricey, you can look into a virtual dedicated server, which is cheaper and should allow you to install whatever applications you need.
Related
I did a windows application project with C#. Now, I wanna to run it as web application.(I mean, i want to install the application on server and the user from other places can connect to the server with a web link and test it).Since all the user do not have the visua studio software, I forced to do that. May you help me to figure this problem out?
Thanks in advance
You can't do that. You can have people be able to Remote Desktop to the server and then run the application. If you wanted it to be accessible via URL, you have to build a webpage.
Short answer: you can't run a Windows application directly in a web environment. And really there is NO WAY you should want that, either.
If you need remote access to the computer running the instance of your application, that can be done with the right software. I can think of TeamViewer, Radmin and Remote Desktop on top of my head.
If support for multiple concurrent users is required then you have two obvious choices:
Deploy your application on every clients, or
Make a Web application.
Now for option 1, there are different ways to do that. Depending of the complexity of your app you may require a Windows Installer setup package. For this there is multiple tools on the net. My personal favorite is WiX. Free, powerful and easy once you get the hang of it. Most installers will also ensure that requirements for the app to run are met, and install the missing components if necessary.
If all you have is a simple EXE file then you could be tempted to just package (ZIP) it and share it any way you want, but be warned: if the correct .NET Framework isn't installed on the client machine, it won't work. IMHO given the tools at your disposition to ensure a proper installation experience for the end user, you have no reason to do that. You can, however, consider using ClickOnce for this scenario.
If that doesn't help you, then please add more details on what your requirements are, maybe you'll get better advice.
PS: About "not every users having the Visual Studio software"... having VS installed should never, EVER be a requirement for the regular user.
You can't just run a Windows application as a Web Application. You need to re-write it as a web application. The users do not need Visual Studio to run your application as you have mentioned in your question. If you give some details of what your application does then maybe you will get some better help.
If you wrote your application using WPF it is possible to deploy it as an XBAP.
There are restrictions associated with deploying an application this way.
The minimum you would need to do is create a Web Application to host said XBAP.
i have a running webserver with ubuntu. (on ec2 instance)
i also have an asmx webservice i created with c#.
i want use this setup to connect between the webserver and couchbase. (but its not very important for the question itself)
is it possible (im guessing yes) to load that asmx(lets call it a file) to run on ubuntu?
what are the best tools/frameworks to deploy asmx webservice on ubuntu?
is there a reason why i should not do that, and deploy it on a windows based server instead?
(like performance, ease of use etc)
Thanks for your help!
1) is it possible (im guessing yes) to load that asmx(lets call it a file) to run on ubuntu?
Yes, you could use Mono.
2) what are the best tools/frameworks to deploy asmx webservice on ubuntu?
Hard to talk about best tools or frameworks. But you could run ASP.NET application on Apache.
3) is there a reason why i should not do that, and deploy it on a windows based server instead? (like performance, ease of use etc)
Yes, the native home of .NET applications is Windows. Mono can only follow the evolution and new features that get introduced in the .NET framework on Windows.
Hey guys, I was working on a simple chat program to brush up on my C#, and ran into a roadblock. I wanted to allow one computer to broadcast its location, and the other to find that computer, and display it (and any others) in a list.. Just a push in the right direction would be great,
Thanks,
Max
Mono.Zeroconf is a .NET library that provides common zeroconf opertations - service publish and discovery. It uses Apple's Bonjour for Windows as a transport on Windows.
Developers can publish services that will be exposed to other computers on the local network and also query the local machines on the network for services that could have been exposed.
See Peer-to-Peer Programming with WCF and .NET Framework 3.5.
All you need is to share destination PC. and then run your web-based application on the target pc IIS.
Updated Part :
If you have awindows application and want users use that application youhave some solution
create a Login form for your application
use from MarshalByRef object and create a Channel between user andaplication
create a MSI (setup) and run it from server (in entire Active Directory).this will install one application in each client
create a simple dot net setup. justRight click onyour windowsproject in VS and then select Publich, in the wizard walk through creating a network application
I think the last option is closest one to your request
Use AD (Active Directory)? Or some such [which would serve as] central messageboard mechanism - maybe even MSMQ?
I'm planning on writing a small program that uses the .NET framework to read disk capacities on remote Windows PCs.
I normally write in C#, so I'd like to stick with this. A number of us in our department need access to this program.
Should I write this as:
a desktop app
an MMC snap-in
an ASP.NET application with a service?
Any suggestions? Many thanks.
A different idea, what about a PowerShell cmdlet with WMI?
A service with WCF comes into my mind. Thus, a central application could query the service on each remote windows PC to get the information.
If these PC's already publish their disc capacities in some form (eg. via windows shares or something else), you could omit the service part and directly query the machines.
WMI already publishes this information. So all you need is a client. Depending on the needs of your users, it could be a WinForms app, an MMC SnapIn, a console app, etc etc.
I've been writing desktop apps in C# for some time now but I'm increasingly getting frustrated with the fact that not everyone has .NET 2 or Higher installed. I don't have the option of upgrading their systems to meet my needs. My apps are mostly utilities that run alongside the main program the company I work for has. They access the file system and the registry. Being relatively new to programming in general, I was wondering if moving these tools to the web would solve some of my problems. But I have no idea if web apps can have access to these parts of Windows. I was thinking of writing these web apps in either Rails or ASP.NET. So my question is this. Can a web app access and modify the registry and file system of Windows?
Thanks.
Nope, "web apps" like asp.net or rails apps run on the server alone and just serve html to the client. So all the client-side code can do is what jscript running in the browser sandbox can do, ie no file access or registry access.
You can however install an activex on the client computer that gets full access, but the user has to agree to install it as it's a security risk.
Writing the apps as Web apps instead (and Rails is cool to use) is a good option - your users don't need to install anything, upgrades are easy to do, and dependancies are no longer a problem.
However, you now need to start re-architecting your apps so they do not need to write anything to the client, except a cookie (that's stored in the browser). If you can do this, then migrating to a webapp will be great.
If you cannot, my advice is to learn the same language that your company's app is written in. Once you do that, the company app will have taken care of the dependencies already and you will just need to offer your utilities alongside the app, perhaps even in the installer, or just to copy the files into a subdirectory. If you're thinking of learning Ruby, then learning the corporate language will be just as difficult (only you'll be able to reuse a lot of code used in the main app)
No, a traditional asp.net application cannot access the file system or registry on the windows box. Simply put because it doesn't actually run on the client machine. Instead it runs on the server where it does not have access to the local machine.
It is possible to have portions of the application which run on the client machine. Browser based applications for instance. However these would require that the 2.0 framework be installed on the customers machine which puts you right back at square #1.
No, this isn't possible. Web applications cannot modify the registry and/or file system on a user's machine because of the security implications. You would need to develop a Windows app to do these kind of changes. You could always make this tool available for download on your website though.
No, you can't do that with a web application. Besides others have already said, a web application run in a browser, not inside an operating system, so all you can do is what browsers allows you to do and not all you want, and browsers doesn't allows you to take control of the host machine.
I'm guessing the desktop app used in your company uses the registry to store workstation / user specific (state)data.
Moving to a web based app does not mean storing state data is no longer possible, just account for it by including a table in your database that can be used to save that same (state)data in. The registry is no longer needed.
Another pro is that by moving to a fully webbased application, you never have to worry about your endusers, because the code is running on the server, all the enduser gets is the output in html :-D.
The only thing to keep in mind is cross browser compatibility, don't create an app that works in IE only for instance, it has to look and work the same in all major browsers.
There are a few products out there, such as Xenocode and VMWare's ThinApp, that allow you to virtualize your app's dependencies to the point where your .NET app can run on a machine without the .NET Framework installed. Just another option from left field.