I want to include a folder in a setup project so that when I deploy that setup the complete folder is also deployed to the install location.
Right click the setup project, and select "View" > "File System", and from there you can access a lot of special folders like install folder, appdata, desktop etc, and add files to there, that will be created when you install the application. Make sure to set the "alwayscreate" property to true.
The answer is good because it gave me clue on how to fix my problem. I think that my requirement was slightly different. I had to include contents of another library project from the same solution. This seems to work fine for Console Applications/Web Sites, but Installer for some reason was not including it. There might be a better way, but this worked for me. In similar fashion, right click the setup project, and:
- Select "View" > "Custom Actions".
- Right click on "Install" folder and select "Add Custom Action".
- Double click on "Application Folder"
- Click on "Add Output..."
- Select the project from the dropdown and in my instance I selected "Content Files", OK it and give it a name.
This will include any resources, from the selected project marked as Content and that are marked for copying, into your installer.
Related
i've already searched and seen almost all in the web and in the forum, but i can't deal with that.
What I'm trying to do is to obtain an installer and then an exe of my form application by using c# in visual studio 2019.
So, i've followed that tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fehVTLNQorQ&ab_channel=FoxLearn
so i correctly obtain the setup file. Then, when i launch it, it installs and if i try to run it i get that error: "You're trying to open a file type system .dll"
What i'm doing wrong?
I also structured my main class as in that response:
Changing a source file to compile Main() method in a project, in VS c# console application
I also used that suggested setting (sorry for non english language but it's quite understandable):
Is there somebody that can help me? thanks a lot
Some things you may want to check:
If you have more than one project in your solution, make sure that the main project is marked as Start-up project. On the solution explorer, right- click on the main project and select "Set as start-up project".
If you only have one project in your solution, check that no .exe is being produced in the corresponding bin folder. If it is, go to your project properties, inside Debug, and make sure that the option "Start project" is selected. You can also try to select the option "Start external program" and browse to the .exe in your bin folder (although the result should be the same).
If no .exe is produced, you may want to have a look at this post. It is similar to you problem I think but the other way round. I looks that the UseAppHost should be True for your case
You have to choose "Publish Items" and not "Primary Output" when you add a "Project Output" in "Application Folder" for .Net Core 3.1 in the setup project created by Visual Studio Installer Projects Extension.
# Alessio Orlando.
Based on my test, there is a different step between adding different project to the installer.
For WPF App(.NET Framework) project and Windows Forms App(.NET Framework) project: You could choose Primary output when you add a "Project output" in "Application Folder" in the setup project.
For WPF Application(.NET Core) project and Windows Forms App: As gigiabbrescia said, you have to choose Publish Items when you add a "Project Output" in "Application Folder" in the setup project.
Finally, there will be an .exe file in your installation directory after installing your Setup (Like the picture below). And you could click on your .exe file to run the program.
I am brand new to building and deploying Windows Forms applications, so new that I'm not even sure "build" and "deploy" are the correct terms. I read this excellent guide to creating an installer for my application, and I mimicked it almost exactly.
I have a winform project UmfExtract and a setup project UmfExtractSetup that installs UmfExtract . After installation, however, on Windows 10, an icon appears at the top of the start menu, under Recently Added: "Shortcut to Primary output from UmfExtract (Active)." I want to rename that to just "Shortcut to UmfExtract" or just "UmfExtract." Additionally, in the installation directory, the .exe and the .exe.config are the same as the original name of my project when I first created it, PythonExecuter. How do I change PythonExecuter.exe to UmfExtract.exe? Elsewhere on the user's computer, the application is named correctly. On the desktop, the shortcut icon says "UmfExtract," which is correct.
In all my research on this, people have said to change the Assembly name. I have done that. The Assembly name is UmfExtract:
I looked into the Outputs property of the Primary output object:
The AssemblyTitle and AssemblyProduct in AssemblyInfo.cs have been changed to UmfExtract:
What else could I possibly be missing? Could I perhaps accidentally be installing an older build of my project? I right-click on each project in the Solution Explorer and click Build (while the Debug/Release drop down box in Visual Studio is set to Release), then I navigate to the Setup project on my local machine and go to \Release\UmfExtractSetup.msi. I imagine that .msi file is updated/overwritten to the new information each time I Build the projects. Could it be that I'm building wrong?
I'm not 100% sure what was wrong, but the problem has been fixed. I believe the error was in the build process. I believe I was installing an old build of the project. I clicked Build > Clean Solution from the menu bar, then Build > Build Solution. I also right-clicked the UmfExtract project and then clicked Clean, then Build, and I also right-clicked the UmfExtractSetup project and then clicked Build (there was no Clean option in the right-click menu for the Setup project).
I downloaded a C# project and I wish to debug the project to see how an algorithm implementation works.
The project has come in a Folder, inside this folder there are -
.sln file and
a folder which has source files and a .csproj file.
I installed Visual Studio and opened the .sln file present in the main folder. I built the project successfully, but when I try to debug the project I get this message:
A project with an Output type of Class Library cannot be started directly In order to debug this project, add an executable project to this solution which references the library project. Set the executable project as the startup project.
The strange part is that I don't see a main function anywhere.
What should I do to get round this hiccup?
The project you have downloaded compiles into a dll assembly and provide a set of classes with implemented functionality.
You should add to your solution a new project with Output Type of either Console Application or Windows Application (VS Add Project wizard will offer you different templates of Projects).
In the newly added project, you can implement logic to test your Class Library.
Output type of the project you can find and change by the following steps:
Right click on project in Solution Explorer -> Properties.
In opened tab with properties select Application and there will be ComboBox marked with Output Type label.
Just right click on the Project Solution
A window pops up.
Expand the common Properties.
Select Start Up Project
In there on right hand side Select radio button with Single Startup Project
Select your Project in there and apply.
That's it. Now save and build your project. Run the project to see the output.
This was the solution that worked for me since I couldn't find 'Common Properties' option.
Select your topmost level project in Solution Explorer.
Go to Project, and in contextual menu Set as StartUp Project.
See also: A project with an Output type of Class Library cannot be started directly
Just needs to go:
Solution Explorer-->Go to Properties --->change(Single Startup project) from.dll to .web
Then try to debug it.
Surely your problem will be solved.
The strange part is that I don't see a main function anywhere.
That is exactly your problem. The project merely creates a DLL. It has no executable to run.
You will need to add a second project, which is an executable which references the other project, and calls something in it.
1) Right Click on **Solution Explorer**
2) Go to the **Properties**
3) Expand **Common Properties**
4) Select **Start Up Project**
5) click the radio button (**Single Start_up Project**)
6) select your Project name
7) Then Debug Your project
Right Click on "Solution Explorer" -> "Properties"
Expand "Common Properties"
Select "Start Up Project"
click the radio button "Single Start_up Project"
select your Project name from the drop down list.
If still not working after the above steps, then try this.
Expand solutions explorer.
Right click on project name -> "Properties"
Go to "Application" tab
Select "Output type"
From the drop down list select the appropriate type according to your application.
"Windows application" or
"Console application"
Then save (ctrl + S)
Try debugging (F5)
You'll need some kind of app (Console Apps are my favorite for debugging, but a WinForm will do) which uses your Class Library. Just add a new project (in the same solution) of a Console Application or Windows Forms Application, and add a reference to your current project. Once you've done that, make any calls you need, set your break points, and go to town.
I had a similar issue when trying to use the Experimental Instance of Visual Studio 2013. This was for a vsix project (Creating Snippets).
Solution was:
Right Click Project in Solution Explorer > Properties > Debug
Setting the Start Action to "Start external program" and using the following path:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\devenv.exe
This option was set to "Start project" which won't work for the application output type Class Library, which caused that same error.
Note: Yours may differ depending on how you installed VS.
Error solutions is that you have already open your project but by mistake you have selected another class library .. that's reason this error is showing ... so what u need to do you u just select u r project then right click on u r project
after right click u can see the list box and select the "Set as start up project " option .
Accepted answer works if your solution has a project that compiles to an exe. If your solution does not have any projects that compile to an exe, then you have to use 'Start external program'.
VS2019 instructions:
right click -> properties on the main solution
debug, start external program, and add command line arguments
VS2022 instructions:
right click -> properties on the main solution
scroll down to Debug
Debug > General > Open debug launch profiles UI
left click the 'new' icon in the top left, select 'executable'
fill it out as per VS2019 (pick the exe and add command line arguments)
when clicking the start button, first select the profile you made
Suppose you have multiple project in the solution. Select the project that you want to view in browser and select 'Set as StartUp Project'. In your multiple project soln which was the main, the visual studio was unable to identify. this was the main problem.
You can right click the Class Library project and from the drop-down choose Initialize Interactive C# which will load your project context and you can work it in the interactive session.
In my case, the cause was that one of my projects in the solution wasn't loaded. The reason it couldn't load properly was that the file path length of one of the files was too long. Upon deleting this long file, I could reload the project, and build the solution.
If the question involves an Azure project, make sure you have the "Azure development" tool set installed, or when you go to run a solution you may get this same error.
Tools > Get Tools and Features... > Tick the box next to Azure development > Click install
None of the answers provided above helped me resolve this error, this is what resolved the issue for me.
Right click on the solution and select "Properties", which is in my case "Sintctech.Data".
Select the section called "Application".
Check what you have selected as your output type. If it is "Windows Application", change it to "Console Appication".
Rebuild and the problem should be fixed.
I want to Change default installation path which is Program Files in windows application When Creating setup. I tried but i couldn't do that please tell me solution.
Right click on your setup project
root in Solution Explorer and choose "View -> File System"
Click on (select)
"Application Folder" in the window
which opened.
If you look in the
"Properties Pane" in Visual Studio there is an entry
called "DefaultLocation". Change this
to point it somewhere besides
"Program Files".
Default value for location is [ProgramFilesFolder][Manufacturer]\[ProductName]. These are placeholders variables which are looked up when you compile the setup project. [ProgramFilesFolder] is the one which will point to "Program Files" in an English version of Windows.
In a Visual Studio Setup project, you control the default install path by setting the DefaultLocation property of the Application Folder folder, within the File System Editor.
This, in turn, as you've found, defaults to [ProgramFilesFolder][Manufacturer]\\[ProductName]. You can either replace this property entirely or you can modify these properties.
Ex: D:\\[Manufacturer]\\[ProductName]
Here it is
Right click on your setup project root in Solution Explorer and choose "View -> File System"
Click on (select) "Application Folder" in the window which opened.
If you look in the "Properties Pane" in Visual Studio there is an entry called "DefaultLocation". Change this to point it somewhere besides "Program Files".
The other solutions don't work for VS 2012 and above. Please follow these steps:
Expand Setup and Deployment Project.
Select Project Assistant, bottom you will find "Installation Interview", click on "Installation Interview".
You can see the Installation Dialogs, select "Yes" for option "Do you want your users to be able to modify the installation location of your application?"
This may be a ridiculous question for you C# pros but here I go. I'm a Flash developer getting started in Silverlight and I'm trying to figure out how to create a "codebase" (a reusable set of classes) for animation. I'd like to store it in a single location and reuse it across a bunch of different projects. Normally in Flash I would add a "project path" reference and then start using the code. My question is, how do I add a folder to visual studio so that I can "use" those classes in my project. I tried "Add > Existing Item" but that copied the files into my project directory.
The easiest way would to create a new ClassLibrary project and build it. This will output a .dll file in a folder you can specify in the project settings menus, which you reference from every project that needs it.
Also, you can copy this .dll into the /bin/ folder of your project - this will do the same thing for this specific project, but when you start the next one you can change some details in the codebase library without breaking the first project.
The solution described by Tomas (adding a reference to a dll binary) is the correct solution to this problem; better than referencing the source code and compiling it into each project.
But just for extra information, if you ever do need to add a source code file to your Visual Studio project without having it make a copy of the file you can use the following steps:
Right click on your project in Solution Explorer and select Add -> Existing Item.
Navigate to the location of the source code file and select it.
On the "Add" button in the dialog window there is a drop down arrow. Click this and select "Add as Link".
This will allow you to use this source code file in your project without having VS make a copy of the file.
In Solution Explorer, right-click on the project node and click Add Reference.
In the Add Reference dialog box, select the tab indicating the type of component you want to reference. (for instance for a class library a dll)
Select the components you want to reference, then click OK.