Hey, what's the easiest way to use a file-based database with LINQ in C#? It would be best if I could use it without installing extra components.
EDIT: I want to use it for a file index. Not the whole file system, but the database should be not too slow and not too big.
I'd recommend MS SQL Server Compact Edition. Its embedable, small footprint, good performance and you can use Linq2Sql to query it easily. Also it integrates well with Visual Studio IDE and SQL Management Studio.
Are you opposed to using XML?
That's basically what XML is (or, rather, is a major use of XML), and Linq to XML is very powerful.
The way i've implemented this kind of thing previously is to load a csv file into a C# List structure (couldn't say which is best without information on the data), and use Linq to access data from there.
This may not be the best solution for you, but you have given limited information on what you're looking for.
You will always need to install database drivers to talk to a specific database. The only way to avoid that is to create your own driver to talk to a database, or even create your own database engine.
However, both SQLite and VistaDB have LINQ to SQL now. Other alternatives are to use a text file or XML file for your "database."
Related
I am developing a small application with ASP and C# in .NET and I want to have a small local database next to it where I can save and retrieve records by either SQL queries or Linq queries. I don't need anything powerful, just something to use instead of keeping records in .txt files.
So what's your suggestion?
Use SQLite
It does not have to be installed and is just a DB File and there are connectors to .Net available.
And you can use LINQ
I would go with either SQLLite or with XML since you are saying very small database.
And with xml you can use Linq to xml
You can use SQL CE or SQLite.
Best to use SQL Express edition since it comes for free. Try using .NET entity framework code first for rapid application development.
In any case application is very small consider using SQL express since you can write neat and clean stored procedures and can play with other database objects.
Please refer http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/en/us/editions/express.aspx for more details.
I'll consider SQLite for this purposes.
If you are more comfortable with MS tools, or for some reason (i.e. your company already has a well formed mdb database file) you can use MS Access too, for local and small applications.
I recommend you to use SQL Server Express, becuase
It is free to use and easy to install
You can easily use either Entity Framework or LINQ TO SQL to manipulate your data
It can easily communicate with your company's DB ( if it is also SQL Server), for example, one day in the future, you may need to test the replication.
No one's mentioned it yet so here it is. mySQL and the .Net mySQL client.
In your case I would consider the following:
XML if you don't with more than a couple hundred records in all tables. And #Ali mentioned already LINQ to XML what will be handy.
VistaDB, because it's 100% managed code and require deployment of just one small assembly for both 32- and 64-bit.
SQL CE, just because it's the most popular one. Of course, it supports LINQ and concurrency.
SQLite as an alternative for SQL CE :)
Don't go with SQL Express unless it's been already provided by your hoster. It increases complexity of distributing/installing of your solution.
I have a server application written in C#.
As the application running, there will be tens of thousands of key->value mapping generated, and this info needs to be persisted. For each of these mapping records, there will be update/delete operation.
What is the best approach to store it? No database.
Is there any performance issue with ConfigurationManager in such case?
How about for thousands of records? Is it possible to avoid using any database?
Thanks!
I know you said "No database", but consider the use of SQL Server Compact which provides a free, small-footprint SQL Server capability that you don't need to install - it's kind of like a grown up version of Jet.
Alternatively, you might want to see if you can find an ISAM implementation.
Assuming the fact you're required to have no database by your hosting, there are still several options:
SQL Server Compact approach when you just place your DB files under App_Data and use ADONET to get to those as if it was a fully functional SQL server.
OLEDB connection to csv, dbf or any other structured file.
Homegrown solution - something like an IDictionary<> collection persisted manually into an XML, flat file, binary array or whatever else.
So you can always use XML for it. Or really use ConfigurationManager files (here is some example MSDN or here Loading custom configuration files)
You may not be able to use a fully fledged database, but you could consider an embedded SQL Engine:
SQL Compact Edition or SQLLite
I've never used SQL CE, but SQLLite is just a single DLL.
Obviously you don't have all the features of a fully fledged database engine, but they are still pretty powerful and certainly much better than Configuration Manager for persisting data.
I agree with Steve Morgan. I recommend SQL Server Compact.
If this question seems common to you, I apologise, I did a quick search around this site and a few google searches and could not find a satisfying answer.
My question is this;
I have only been a software developer for 3-4 years now. This may seem like a time long enough to answer this question myself however in all my time, I have never had to develop software where the main body of data-storage is not required to be in an on-line database. This time however, my latest development requires only for its data to be stored only to disk.
The actual data itself is light-weight. In-code the main asset will be a class with only a few, string based properties on it which must be persisted. My initial thoughts are on simple serialisation. On application close new assets are simply serialised and stored on disk as a file. I also though maybe for backup purposes (or if it is somehow a better option to a serialised class) an XML file would be appropriate.
I cannot think of any distinct disadvantages of either of these approaches, it is this fact which causes me to ask this question publicly. In my experience, there is rarely a solution to a problem which does not have it's downsides.
Serialization (binary or XML) is appropriate for a small amount of data. The problem with this approach is when you get large amounts of data (that you may need to query).
If you are on a windows platform and in need of a proper database, you can use the embedded database engine that comes with windows - ESENT. It is the backing store of Exchange and RavenDB.
Here are the .NET wrapper libraries for it.
ManagedEsent provides managed access to ESENT, the embeddable database engine native to Windows. ManagedEsent uses the esent.dll that is part of Microsoft Windows so there are no extra unmanaged binaries to download and install.
The most lightweight solution, is of course to use XML and serialization. The main advantage of that is that it is very easy, requiring little code, and is easily editable using a text editor. The other advantage of this is being able to have multiple files, and they will be easy to transfer from PC to PC.
Here is a nice tutorial on XML serialization.
However, if your application is going to be reading, writing, and changing the data a lot, and there is only one source of data, it would be better to use a light-weight database. Many people like SQLite, while I personally prefer Firebird.
See this question for using SQLite with C#, and see here for information for using Firebird with .net.
Another embedded database option is Sql Server Compact Edition. The latest version of this is v4 and it seems to be much improved over previous versions.
It's functionally equivalent to using an XML file, or an access database, or even a plain old text file, in that you don't need to have a Sql Server service running or install anything special on the machine that your application runs on.
I've been using Sqlite in a project and it works very well and it's easy to use too, one thing to keep it mind when using Sqlite though is that it's designed to be used in a single user environment, so if you use it as the database for the backend of a website for instance you're likely to find that it'll struggle under the slightest of load..
Check out this link for the C# wrapper:
http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com/
I also use NHibernate and NHibernate.Linq to interact with the data, you can get a build of both which are compatible here: http://www.dennisdoomen.net/2009/07/nhibernate-210-ga-with-linq-and-fluent.html
NHibernate.Linq allows you to use those nice Linq query syntax on your Sqlite db:
var onePiece = from s in session.Linq() where s.Name == "One Piece" select s;
Complete newbie question here: I'm just playing with C# for the first time and want to make a Windows Forms application which stores some info in a database structure, but obviously don't want to require something like MySQL to be installed on each client's computer. How do I go about this?
You can use SQLite. It doesn't require any installation or server on the client's computers. Here is an blog describing how to use it with .NET. It is easy to use, just add a reference to the System.Data.SQLite.dll.
Here is an open source data provider for .NET: System.Data.SQLite
From homepage: "SQLite is a software library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine. SQLite is the most widely deployed SQL database engine in the world. The source code for SQLite is in the public domain."
You use a database that doesn't require an install. There are a few out there - there's Microsoft SQL Server Compact, which frankly is badly named, as it won't support the more useful SQL functions like stored procedures, views and so on. There's also VistaDB which does support stored procs, but requires purchase if you want Visual Studio plugins.
The answer is Embedded Databases. You've got quite a large list of Embedded databases that you can use:
Commercial:
VistaDB - This database is written completely in managed C#.
Open Source:
Firebird - .NET Driver
SQLite - .NET Driver
You could write your data to XML files, or you could take a look at the Sql Server Compact Edition.
You could also work with objects and serialize/deserialize these to disk as binaries.
Of course the type of storage you choose depends a lot on the kind of data you're storing (and the volume of it).
Use SQL Server CE
An easy way to do it from .NET 3.5 onwards is to store your data in XML files and use Linq to XML. This allows you to use SQL-like commands on your data which are actually compiled into your application, so you get full IDE IntelliSense support and error checking.
Perhaps you could serialise a dataset and save it as XML. I'm a little confused why if you're playing around you would need to install MySQL on all client's computers. You could look at using SQL Express which is free perhaps?
Serialise Dataset:
http://blogs.msdn.com/yosit/archive/2003/07/10/9921.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163911.aspx
The Easiest way will be SQL Server Compact, Because it integrates directly into the Visual Studio IDE (I'm just hazarding the guess here that you use VS). Add the "Local Database", Create your tables and be sure to make your Table Adapter with Select, Update, Insert and Delete methods. If during Database Creation you called your Dataset "DS" you will be able to instantiate a Table Adapter Object from
DSTableAdapters
Namespace, and Use GetData() or Fill() methods to retrieve your Data, and Insert(), Update() and Delete() to Manage it.
VelocityDB works in a server less mode but can also be combined with a server when there is a need for it. It outperforms all the other choices mentioned here by roughly a magnitude, see comparison here. It allows you to use almost any .NET data structures persistently. The entire database engine and the optional server is implemented using C# code.
I am just beginning to write an application. Part of what it needs to do is to run queries on a database of nutritional information. What I have is the USDA's SR21 Datasets in the form of flat delimited ASCII files.
What I need is advice. I am looking for the best way to import this data into the app and have it easily and quickly queryable at run time. I'll be using it for all the standard things. Populating controls dynamically, Datagrids, calculations, etc. I will also need to do user specific persistent data storage as well. This will not be a commercial app, so hopefully that opens up the possibilities. I am fine with .Net Framework 3.5 so Linq is a possibility when accessing the data (just don't know if it would be the best solution or not). So, what are some suggestions for persistent storage in this scenario? What sort of gotchas should I be watching for? Links to examples are always appreciated of course.
It looks pretty small, so I'd work out an appropriate object model, load the whole lot into memory, and then use LINQ to Objects.
I'm not quite sure what you're asking about in terms of "persistent storage" - aren't you just reading the data? Don't you already have that in the text files? I'm not sure why you'd want to introduce anything else.
I would import the flat files into SQL Server and access via standard ADO.NET functionality. Not only is DB access always better (more robust and powerful) than file I/O as far as data querying and manipulation goes, but you can also take advantage of SQL Server's caching capabilities, especially since this nutritional data won't be changing too often.
If you need to download updated flat files periodically, then look into developing a service that polls for these files and imports into SQL Server automatically.
EDIT: I refer to SQL Server, but feel free to use any DBMS.
My temptation would be to import the data into SQL Server (Express if you aren't looking to deploy the app) as it's a familiar source for me. Alternatively you can probably create an ODBC data source using the text file handler to get you a database-like connection.
I agree that you would benefit from a database, especially for rapid querying, and even more so if you are saving user changes to the data. In order to load the flat file data into a SQL Server (including Express), you can use SSIS.
Use Linq or text data to list method
1.create a list.
2.Read the text file line by line (or all lines).
3.process the line - get required data and attach to the list.
4.process the list for any further use.
the persistence storage will be files and List is volatile.