I have .NET exe, I want to create a setup for this and after any login or restart this exe should be called automatically.
As you are deploying a .NET application, there are multiple ways in which you can approach this challenge.
There are many questions you have to consider when choosing an installer strategy. These include:
How do I plan to distribute this software?
Is the software supposed to be connected to the internet in any way?
What users is the software targeted towards?
Do these users have specific computer installations, such as all having .NET Framework already installed?
How should I approach the problem of updates to the software?
After answering some of these questions, you can get a general idea of how you should distribute the software. Then, you need to consider the various installers, and Wikipedia has a convenient list that compares them, which might help you.
Below are some examples of what might work for you:
ClickOnce deployment built into Visual Studio - my current favorite way, as this is the most easiest for users and for developers because updates and interaction is extremely simple
NSIS (Nullsoft Scriptable Install System), an open source scripting system for such installers. A great tutorial on packaging and checking for the .NET Framework with NSIS can be found here.
InstallShield (from Macrovision) - a heavily used installer system, but this one is not free, unlike other solutions
DreamShield - I haven't tried this one, but it appears to be a viable solution.
WiX (with Visual Studio plugin)
Deployment of applications is a very tough part of software development, especially in .NET, because how can we know, for example, whether the potential user already has the .NET Framework installed on their system or not? Or what version is installed? Thus, we must use tools like ClickOnce and NSIS to help.
To your question about how to start your application immediately at login, there are four ways to approach this:
Add registry key to start at login/bootup - MSDN explains that very well here. However, most installation systems allow you to automatically configure the registry key for bootup addition.
Use the Windows Task Scheduler to schedule a "task", in other words, to create a task that runs at startup. There is a .NET library for that here, I've used it in two of my applications that run on a specific schedule, it works great!
Adding the path to your executable into the Startup folder located at C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Startup(that is for all users - for single users you can customize the username in that path). By the way, that location is in Windows XP, it may be different in other version of Windows.
If your application is a Windows Service, you can already automatically start at bootup, through svchost! There is a simple service configuration that will allow you to accomplish this.
Hope I helped!
You can use Inno Setup for the specific tasks described in the other answers.
By setup, I'm going to assume you mean the conventional installer. A good open source solution is NSIS. If that does not work, here is a more complete list.
As for having it start whenever the computer restarts/you login, that is platform specific (the installer can be platform specific if the program is). On windows, the installer needs to add a shortcut to your program in the folder
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Startup
(that is the easy method, there are surely more complicated registry settings).
This blog post lists a few useful links to info about Setup and Deployment projects using Visual Studio.
You could also google with the keywords ".net deployment project".
Although not .NET specific, you can try InstallJammer. Its open source and multiplatform.
Related
I've got a sizable project, with multiple classes, 500+ images, and 20+ text files associated with said project.
I've been publishing my project via right clicking on the project->properties, and clicking on the publish tab. I've included the text files and images as resources already.
The issue is that whenever I install an application, usually it's a simple installer, i.e. you download an installer (one file such as installer.exe), run this file which then takes you through the setup, such as where to install it to, etc. Then the application is installed and that's it.
Well, when publishing my application, I specify an output directory, and I'm left with these files:
Application files
MyProjectName.application (the manifest?)
setup.exe
If I run setup.exe, I'm able to install the application and run it with no issues. However, not only does it not let me choose where to install it, but I would have to send all 3 of these files to the user. I tried to send just the setup.exe to a friend and it said they were missing the files required (which I'm assuming is what the application files and .application were for).
How would I go about bunching these all into one installer, one that more closely matches how you would install an enterprise application (think of installing chrome, eclipse, photoshop, etc)?
I've love to be able to have one file which is the installer and be able to have users download that.
Thank you
The Ancients: If the below is TL;DR (too long, didn't read), please skim these two links:
Troubleshooting Setup and Deployment Projects
Why use Windows Installer XML (WiX) over VDPROJ?
UPDATE: September 2018 - Since this "answer" was recently downvoted, let me try to add some more links to see if the intent of
the answer can be made more clear. Not to be overly dramatic, but:
As deployment specialists we have to warn people when they commit to using a tool that is bound to fall apart for them down the line when more advanced deployment requirements invariably surface.
The installer projects have several times been pulled back and then
re-introduced in Visual Studio. Always based on the problems seen
with these project types (just the bigger ones):
1) No MSBuild support (not tested extensively by me, but by others), 2) only deferred mode custom actions running in system context (not insertable in GUI), 3) highly limited control overall (always advertised shortcuts, no ability to configure certain things, etc...), 4) no support for proper service installation - requires custom actions instead, 5) very few available prerequisites to bundle, 6) rudimentary GUI with little flexibility, 7) appears to not be possible to define MSI features (as in features and components), 8) problems with 32 / 64 bitness issues for custom actions, etc...
An old MSDN page on this project types and its problems: Troubleshooting Setup and Deployment Projects.
MSI Expert Chris Painter and others:
Are Visual Studio Setup projects suitable for complex setups?
Why use Windows Installer XML (WiX) over VDPROJ? (recommended)
In my opinion the project type can only work for simple.NET applications. Any complexity of caliber and you are in trouble. SQL Scripts, IIS, proper COM / COM+, Users & Groups, Shares, Firewall Rules, Custom GUI, etc... Commercial tools and WiX have advanced support for these things. The internals of the compiled MSI files are also sub-standard (use of self-registration, custom actions for services, etc...). I often experience that the tool stops working for "some unknown reason" as well. Suddenly it won't compile. Concrete Example (with fix).
Alternatives:
Simple List View of Deployment Tools
WiX Quick-Start Hints (if the tool needs to be free)
How to create windows installer
(links to all kinds of deployment tools, summary of MSI advantages and
some brief descriptions of trending deployment technologies)
The open source WiX toolkit features a component called
Burn to create such setup.exe launchers / downloaders
/ bootstrappers - used to run several installations in sequence and /
or install prerequisites (a very common task - Visual Studio projects
only support a few prerequisites).
Writing WiX XML markup code is necessary to use this Burn feature.
Commercial tools Installshield and Advanced Installer
provide GUI-features to build such setup.exe files.
The Visual Studio installer is very limited, I never use it. WiX (link to an answer trying to provide some links for a WiX crash course) is a full blown, open source deployment solution. It will take you a while to master, but it is very good and flexible. A commercial solution such as Installshield or Advanced Installer will allow you to deliver a setup faster and easier, but they can be very pricey.
Given the limitations of Visual Studio Installer projects (and bugs), I do believe the right solution is to use a different tool:
What installation product to use? InstallShield, WiX, Wise, Advanced Installer, etc. If you need anything advanced at all, you will struggle otherwise. With a more advanced tool it is at least possible to do what you need, even if it might be more involved at times.
Let me know what you want to know about such a process, and I will try to help. I am not sure what software you are delivering, what the target user group is, what budget you have, etc... Windows Installer is highly desirable for a number of corporate benefits, but other deployment technologies exist (see the description above of various tools to use).
i created an application using c# language. this application is doing a task like report generation.i am using that application exe file directly to run the application.i never installed that application in my system. without installation of that application, i can use it in my system.then why people are installing a software/application in systems.please clarify me. so that i can differentiate the MSI installation and direct use of exe file.
Install in cs jargon means guided setup, so what you do is already, basically, installing. Installing may involve much more complicated steps than simple copy/paste of bin directory or unzipping in some folder. installation process may contain the below processes:
Controlling user license
Registry key control
Database creation
Com components registration
....
and much more.
But the core concept remains the same: guided setup of all necessary components of your program to run it properly. So, if the only thing your program needs is a binaries folder, copy/paste is your install.
What you are doing is called an "xcopy" deployment. It was all the rage when .NET came out but it has serious limitations.
Windows Installer (MSI) is a windows platform service / SDK that aimed to create a declarative framework for consistent installer behavior. Simply put instead of learning how to write script to automate install/uninstall (and making a lot of mistakes along the way) you leverage MSI to tell it I have a product named X with feature Y that has these files Z in these directories along with a shortcut and some registry entries and let MSI do the rest for you.
I need to create a simple installer of sorts for a different application. That other application already has it's own simplistic installer, and I don't want to meddle with it.
The reason for my own installer is to allow the user to install SQL Express if (s)he so chooses, and also to pre-install any other basic requirements for such a procedure.
At the moment, here's where I'm at:
I've created a single Windows form application, with big buttons (this is for a user which likely won't be very good with computers) to install SQL Server Express (using silent install with a predefined set of arguments) or the actual application, along with some helpful text to let the user know what's going on. Something along the lines of Visual Studio autorun window.
I've also added the standard set of pre-requirements to the application (.NET, Windows Installer).
Everything works OK if I run the app by using the executable. HOWEVER, if I publish it to create a ClickOnce application (so the pre-requisites are installed when needed) and run it, it stops running other installers.
EDIT: Apparently the problem with not being able to run other application from a ClickOnce application is only on my end, and probably deserves a new question, not necessarily here on StackOverflow (perhaps on MSDN forums?).
In your program before launching the installer you can check if .NET is installed. Its pretty easy to check if a particular s/w or a version of s/w is installed. Write a program that will check HKEY/LocalMachine/Microsoft/Windows/CurrentVersion/Uninstall and in that there will be list of programs that have been installed on that machine. If you find then go ahead with your install else suggest user that he needs to install pre req.
When you create a setup project you can right click on the setup project, go to properties, and click on pre requisites. In that you can mention which version of .NET framework is needed and then give the location of the framework. In this link look for Huggy Bears response eggheadcafe.com/community/aspnet/2/10131905/setup-project.aspx
I've settled for a "Click Once" application. It can install all required .NET components needed for it to run, thus becoming an "sure-to-run-non-native-C++-code-splash-screen".
Granted, there ARE issues with Click Once, but this is far better than nothing. It's also better than running C++ or unmanaged code applications. ;)
This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What are the specific differences between .msi and setup.exe file?
I am working on an installer for a new version of my project (C#).
Previously, I've used Inno Setup to create .exe files for installing my projects on other computers in the workplace. While reading through some tutorials, though, I came across Windows Installer XML, which uses XML files to build a .msi installer.
My project will be available on a network share that all the employees have access to so they can install the software (I'm currently working on an update checker as well)
What are the major differences between .exe and .msi installers? Why would I want to chose one over the other? Would either make more sense given my specific environment?
I found some of the information at this question, but there was not a lot of information.
I wouldn't use WiX for a new project. I'd use an 'Installer Project' in Visual Studio to build an MSI. An installer project is much, much easier to put together.
Many exe installers are actually stubs or containers that hold an MSI, btw.
I guess you've checked out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Installer?
MSI's give administrators the ability to restrict installs, rebase installs, change or add custom actions, automate installs/reinstalls/uninstalls, standard logging and switches. It just really integrates into a corporate IT environment ( http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb742606.aspx ).
A custom installer may have many of those features, but that would depend on the installer package.
Most EXE installers available today are simply stubs to verify that the target machine has just enough support to launch an MSI stored within the EXE. They do basic windows version checking and Windows Installer version checking, then essentially invoke msiexec and let Windows Installer handle the rest.
For a very basic installation, the Installer Project in Visual Studio can get you by, but for just about any kind of real customization or tweaking you'll need a real MSI editor. We use WiX and love it - but it's a bear to learn. If you've got the cash you can invest in InstallShield - but that has it's own set of quirks.
MSI is configurable while EXE is not. I know this doesn't answer your question directly, but I thought I should point towards the ClickOnce technology.
MSDN: See example here.
Simply stated, a ClickOnce application
is any Windows Presentation
Foundation, Windows Forms, or console
application published using ClickOnce
technology. You can publish a
ClickOnce application in three
different ways: from a Web page, from
a network file share, or from media
such as a CD-ROM. A ClickOnce
application can be installed on an end
user's computer and run locally even
when the computer is offline, or it
can be run in an online-only mode
without permanently installing
anything on the end user's computer.
For more information, see Choosing a
ClickOnce Deployment Strategy.
IndigoRose's MSI factory is extremely powerful and much, much cheaper than InstallShield.
It uses WiX internally and allows you to modify the XML files in any way you like. The bootstrapper (.exe, if you add one) has a powerful scripting engine based on Lua to do... well anything.
We are working on deploying a very custom application.
The application is the main program (and only program) that will run on the PC, but it depends on multiple 3rd party installers that must be installed via separate setup programs. Some of these are standard MSI, install shield, other outdated setups, etc.
On top of that we must deploy SQL Server Express 2005, install IIS if it is not found and setup a website.
Our final end user deploying this will be a person with technical experience on a new "out of the box" PC with XP SP3.
What is a good option for developing this? WiX? Visual Studio setup projects may not cut it. There is also the issue of somehow running other MSI's while an MSI is already running.
Would it function better as a standard C# application that requires .Net to be preinstalled? Then it would merely prompt for a few options then run several installers I suppose.
Any thoughts? We'd prefer to stick to C# .Net.
Doesn't XP SP3 already have a .NET runtime installed?
If your end user is someone with technical experience then it seems reasonable to sacrifice some of the "wizardness" of an MSI package for the flexibility of something a little more raw, such as a Ruby script, Powershell script, or .NET console or Winforms app.
This comes down to the benefit vs. cost.
If this is only to be run on a single or small number of target PCs and you have the ability to support the install (even remotely), I would recommend going to a manual install for any 3rd party dependencies.
It will be much easier to provide each package's installer with written instructions and provide than to write/test/debug (and probably still support) a complex, fully automated installer that will only be used once or thrice.
If there will be many installations, the automation will give more benefit.
There is an installer product called Inno Setup that might suit your needs. It allows for custom scripting so you can detect whether all of the dependencies are installed.
If some of them are not installed then with some scripting the installer can download and install the 3rd party dependencies before installing your app. Some help with that can be found at the Code Project article. (http://www.codeproject.com/KB/install/dotnetfx_innosetup_instal.aspx)
The only problem with this route is the scripting language is in pascal.
Just a question, is the company you work for supplying the boxes because if you are then couldn't you pre-install the software? At least that way there is one less thing that can go wrong.
WIX is a fairly flexible way to create the installer (although the learning curve can be quite a bit as the documentation still is lacking). That would probably be your best bet for installing the components that are actually your product's artifacts. Have it check that the required components are installed, but I wouldn't try to launch installers off of it. Instead, like Seth mentioned, write a Powershell script/VBScript (or Console application) that will do the component checking and launch the old installers for user in the order necessary. Of course you would need a way to capture when the installer finishes before continuing on (don't know if VBScript really has that capability, so Powershell/Console app may be a wise choice). And the final installer called would be your product. This way if there's reboots required the installer can be ran the exact same way and would just keep checking for required components and firing off installers as needed.