I am working on a WPF app and the UI is getting a bit complex to manage. I am looking for advice on how to maintain it as it grows.
The layout looks something like this
<Grid>
<List of Objects View/>
<Objects Relationship View/>
<Object Details View />
<Multiple Objects Details View/>
<View 5 />
<View 6 />
:
:
</Grid>
Each view gets created (visibility hidden) and bound to some complex data, when the window is constructed. I want only one view visible, to the user at a time. I do this by manipulating visibility.
But the problem is the transition between views doesn't involve just fliping Visibility. It involves rebinding with currentdata, stoping background threads/timers and starting new ones (and possibly some binding again) that support the newly selected view. So what's happening is with every new view I add, I am adding a whole bunch of code to take care of all the possible transitions.
Is there some pattern I can use to deal with this kind of scenario?
Also is there some way I can avoid creating and hiding everything at app load and using visibilty as a controller?
Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
May I ask how you are allowing the user to switch back and forth between the views? Is it a key combo? Mouseclick?
Not that it's answering your question per se, but my suggestion is that this sounds like a perfect scenario for a tab control. And with WPF, it doesn't necessarily have to look anything like a tab control.
If you use a TabControl, it opens up the possibility of using the SelectionChanged event coming off of the TabControl to allow you to tell background threads to stop and you can unload anything that you need to unload.
Depending on how you use the TabControl, the UI can be somewhat virtualized. What that means is that whenever a tab is unselected all of the UI for that tab is destroyed and recreated the next time it's selected. It will behave this way if you use the MVVM or PresentationModel pattern and load ViewModels as the items for your TabControl and use DataTemplates for the views. If you just put TabItems into the TabControl with controls inside of them, it will not behave this way, however.
As far as patterns are concerned, I'd definitely recommend MVVM. It may take a bit of time to catch up to it and understand it, but I'd never do WPF without it. If you need anymore resources or examples, let me know.
edit:
I reread your question and noticed that you may be in need of another type of navigation. If you've got views that are needing to make transitions to other views based on user actions and you don't want all of the views to be presented to the user so that they can select which one they want to look at (like the TabControl will do), you may want to look at WPF Navigation. Navigation is basically something that MS added in with WPF to allow browser style navigation in a WPF app. This MSDN article should be a good resource on that kind of thing.
This sounds like a problem well suited to Composite WPF (Prism). You can define your main area as a region, and use a SingleActiveRegion to show one view at a time. If you create your own region adapter, you can do all the maintenance when the active view changes.
Also, adding a new view won't involve changing the hosting view's code. This will allow you to deploy additional views in the future in separate assemblies...
Related
I want to create a kiosk mode application using WPF. I want to use a single window because the user should not be able to exit this fullscreen application.
The application should guide the user trough a process. When the user proceeds trough the process, the screen should constantly change and show him the next step.
Usually I just create a single window and use a "state machine" to switch UserControls containing the information for the current step. Is there a better way to achieve this functionality? Maybe I would get a better result using multiple windows or Pages (never used them).
The reason why I am asking is that in future I want to have a simple, clean way of switching the content inside a single window. i.e. I am planning to implement some sort of animation when switching content (like sliding to the next / previous step). I don't want to put more effort into my current approach if it isn't the most flexible and clean one.
Any ideas?
PS: This is about desktop applications. Today I come from the Winforms environment and am experimenting with WPF.
There's a few ways you can achieve this.
First would be to use a Page based application, this will allow you to use a single window. Here is a pretty interesting tutorial
A bonus of using this approach is that navigation between pages is built in.
Your requirements are that you need to use animation for transitioning between pages, as far as I'm aware, using a Page based application cannot achieve this (I may be wrong). So your other option would be to use a UserControl MVVM approach.
This probably won't make a lot of sense now, but here goes:
You can use a single master view model which will hold multiple child view models, each of these could have a visibility property which dictates the visibility of the associated view. The master view model would simply be responsible for displaying the appropriate view model depending on where the user currently is in the application.
Using some clever XAML, you can create storyboards (animations) when the view becomes visible, which will allow you to achieve the crazy awesome animations that you require.
Anyway, that probably didn't make any sense, so here's a tutorial to get you started with MVVM.
I am working on a Win8 app destined for the Windows Store. Hurdles I am trying to overcome is how to deal with the different ways an app can be displayed.
Currently, my main pages is a LayoutAwarePage so it has logic to handle different visual states. However, my question is more how to make my page render differently depending on its state.
I thought, initially, that you basically created a layout for each state that the application supports. But it seems like the VisualStateManager portion of the XAML is just an area where you make piecemeal modifications to the design (hide an element, change an alignment).
I am working with a grid that has many columns and rows to organize my controls and it looks great in fullscreen. However, this doesn't work at all in the snapped state, as most of my controls become hidden off screen. I could certainly add a ScrollViewer control, but this is basically a hack and a usability nightmare for a user.
Thanks for any insight!
It might be that your app doesn't lend itself to snapped view. You are allowed to simply display a message / image that states this. Alternatively, consider just showing the columns that are most important.
The standard MS way seems to be to replace horizontal oriented controls with vertical ones - maybe a listview or something would look better. You'll probably find your code easier to read if you have one control for snapped and another for full screen.
Not exactly related to your question, but Blend works very well with XAML to allow you to manipulate the grid or show the relevant control.
Here is a very good guide from Jerry Nixon.
http://blog.jerrynixon.com/2012/12/walkthrough-implementing-snapview-in.html
I am attempting to create a WinForms application which allows the user to display and edit data stored in a MSSQL database. The data being altered is hierarchical, and within a single level of the hierarchy the properties which may be altered are identical; in other words the controls for a single level of the hierarchy are the same, but they may differ from other levels.
I am trying to create the application in such a way that there is only a single form with controls that update based on the hierarchical level of the item being viewed by the user. I realize this is possible by putting all the controls for all levels on a single form and updating their 'Visible' property, but that method makes design of the form difficult due to clutter... Have any of you found a more elegant/less ugly solution?
If you want to do this in WinForms, you can take advantage of the fact that visibility and enabled-ness are both "heritable" traits in the Windows model.
In other words, if you group all of your controls within a parent container (such a Panel or UserControl), then disable that container control and make it invisible, all of its child controls will also become likewise disabled and invisible.
I recommend creating UserControls for each level of the hierarchy. The line of thinking is pretty much the same as if you used separate Forms, except that they're not actually separate Forms. Multiple UserControl objects can be displayed on a single form, so you can have as many as you need. This keeps all related controls together, which makes management much easier. You can also interact individually with these UserControls in the WinForms designer, just like they were separate Forms, solving the "clutter" problem.
To toggle between "active" hierarchies, loop through all of your UserControl objects. Make the currently "active" one enabled and visible (all of its children will automatically become likewise). Make the rest of them disabled and hidden (and all of their children will automatically become likewise).
I won't argue with HighCore here, though. If you don't already know WinForms, you could just as easily spend your time learning WPF. If you decide to do so and want to know how to accomplish this same task in that UI framework, please be sure to ask a new question.
First of all, I want to let everyone know that I'm very new to the MVVM concept, and have looked pretty extensively for some explanation of what I want to do, but to no avail.
In the program I'm working on, I have a UserControl with a few buttons on it, which need to control the navigation of the main window. I have 3 different "pages" I want to be able to switch between in my main window. Instead of pages, I decided (for whatever reason, correct me if this is not the best approach) to use a UserControl for each page, and switch the visibility to the correct one. I need the data to persist while switching, so I don't believe that creating new instances of the Usercontrols will work.
My question is: How can I bubble the events from my "NavBarView" to the main window in a way that will allow me to switch the visibility, but in a MVVM way? I know I may be completely going about this the wrong way, and I'm happy to take any suggestions on a better way of achieving this navigation.
I have to use WPF, so WinForms is not an option. Too much transparency and custom controls for WinForms.
I would make the "NavBar" part of the main window if possible and use that to control the sub controls in the forms. I would be careful nesting User Controls. If you can avoid it I would (key indication is are you going to reuse it somewhere else). I took over a project a while back that had a main window with 3 separate highly coupled user controls that had to all work together and it was a nightmare. The only way I could get it to work somewhat safely was to have them all set their data context to the same view model. If I had to do it from scratch - would have taken a completely different approach with a single view.
All in WPF:
Developing a wizard application, user has to answer a number of simple questions before brought to the main app. The main app is then prefilled with the information obtained from the wizard.
I started with a Window which I then planned to add usercontrols to. The main window would have the user control in the first row, then Next and Previous buttons to control moving between the controls in the second row. This way I could easily control the logic to switch between screens like:
WizardControl1.IsVisible = false;
WizardControl2.IsVisible = true;
But for some reason, user controls do not have setter for IsVisible. Hurray.
So then I thought I would just use seperate windows for each section of the wizard. The problem with this approach is that now when stepping between, the window opens in random positions, and by steppign through the wizard with next, the next window pops up randomly which is really distracting and frustrating.
So how can I develop a wizard properly? I don't get why this is so hard...not exactly rocket science... replacing text and controls and storing input after pressing next/previous!
Thanks
Check this link:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/InternationalizedWizard.aspx
This is the article about building wizard in WPF by Josh Smith, it's seems to be nice pattern.
I found it's helpful for me, hope you'll too.
There is also an open source Avalon Wizard control on codeplex.
I'd probably aproach this using data binding and template selectors. Have the wizard form bind to a "WizardData" class, which exposes a list of "WizardPage" base classes.
The WizardData class can expose properties defining the correct info on the forms, and display a control for the main page that uses a template selector to determine the proper control to display based on the actual type of the particular wizard page.
It sounds like more work than it is, really. It also gives you the benefit of good separation between code and UI (all "work" is done by the WizardData and WizardPage classes), and the ability to test logic independent of the UI.
It's also a very WPF/MVVM way of approaching the problem.
I recognize this does not directly address your question, but I thought I'd mention it as a possible alternative. I've used Actipro's Wizard control with pretty good results, and when I have needed support, they have been very responsive. I am not affiliated with them in any way; I just like not having to write the plumbing to manage a wizard.
The property is called "Visibility".
I find that I do better when I dynamically add and removing controls rather than hide them.
I was looking for a Wizard solution too. I have the need to stick with stock WPF components so I implemented the wizard using a standard form and a tab control.
I only hide the tabs at runtime so there available in the IDE. At runtime just use Back, Next, Finish... to navigate thru the tab items
works good