We Keep Coding

How to call specific function depending on a variable?

I'm generating a random number from 1-1000. I have 200 functions named function1, function4, function 10, function 11, etc. What I would like to do is execute a specific function depending on if the number generated requires a function, and ignore it if not.
My first thought was to create an int[] containing all of the values that would trigger a function, and if the int[] contains the random number to use if statements to figure out what the number is. I'm concerned that it must be a really crude solution to an easy problem though.
I know the "best way" to do something is subjective, but is there a better way to accomplish this?

UPDATE: As per comments, I should probably have started out by pointing out that doing this for 200 functions is probably a good sign that there is some serious issue in your design. This is probably an XY question where you are trying to solve a problem in some crazy way and asking about your intended solution instead of asking about the problem itself.
That said I'll leave the original answer because it's still good advice when mapping a reasonable amount of function calls that can/will change during the life cylce of your app or dynamically as the code runs.
I won't get into why you are doing this, but I'll try to at least point you in the right direction so this doesn't become a complete nightmare when you need to modify/expand behavior:
You can map numbers to function calls using delegates and a dictionary. Assuming your functions take no arguments and return void you'd do:
var functionsMap = new Dictionary<int, Action>();
//map functions
var r = getSomeRandomNumber();
if (functions.TryGetValue(r), out var a)
a(); //invoke function
Mapping functions is simply adding keys and values:
functionsMap.Add(1, () => function1());
functionsMap.Add(3, () => function3());
//etc.
If your functions take arguments or return values, you'd use the adequate delegate: Action<T>, Func<T1, T2> etc.

You can use reflection to invoke appropriate method:
Type exampleType = exampleObject.GetType();
MethodInfo exampleMethod = exampleType.GetMethod(methodName);
exampleMethod.Invoke(this, null);
Where methodName can be created using your random number.

Without commenting on the wisdom of having 200 functions named the way yours are, you can use reflection to determine whether a given functionX() exists, like so:
public void ExecuteDynamicMethod(int number)
{
// Modify these two lines with your app's dll/exe and class type:
Assembly assembly = Assembly.LoadFile("...Assembly1.dll");
Type type = assembly.GetType("YourClassType");
if (type != null)
{
MethodInfo methodInfo = type.GetMethod("function" + number);
if (methodInfo != null)
{
object classInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(type, null);
methodInfo.Invoke(classInstance, null); // null = "no function arguments"
}
}
}
This can then be called for a given value like
ExecuteDynamicMethod(14);
See this SO answer for the inspiration behind this.

Reflection can be used for this purpose. I want to give and keep below example for not only the objective of the question but also for future reference. Also, of course that many function is not good but below code shows the approach that can work with many functions if they have similar name (like starting with "function" keyword).
Assume below is Methods.cs
using System;
using System.Reflection;
namespace YourMethodNamespace
{
public class YourMethodClass
{
public void function1()
{
Console.WriteLine("Function-1");
}
public void function2()
{
Console.WriteLine("Function-2");
}
...
public void function200()
{
Console.WriteLine("Function-200");
}
public static void invokeMethodsDynamically(int randomNumber){
Type yourClassType = typeof(YourMethodClass);
ConstructorInfo yourClassConstructorInfo = yourClassType.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes);
object yourClassObject = yourClassConstructorInfo.Invoke(new object[]{});
//If the constructor has parameters, then we can pass them by this way. Like below;
/*ConstructorInfo yourClassConstructorInfo = yourClassType.GetConstructor(new[]{typeof(int)});
object yourClassObject = yourClassConstructorInfo.Invoke(new object[]{3});
*/
MethodInfo[] methodInfoArr = yourClassType.GetMethods();
foreach(MethodInfo methodInfo in methodInfoArr){
if(methodInfo.Name == "function" + randomNumber){
methodInfo.Invoke(yourClassObject, null);
}
}
}
}
}
Let's say below is Program.cs
using System;
using YourMethodNamespace;
namespace YourProgramNamespace
{
public class YourProgramClass
{
public static void Main()
{
Random random = new Random();
int randomNumber = random.Next(1, 201);
//If Methods.cs is in another Assembly
/*string pathToDllAssembly = #"Domain.dll";
Assembly dllAssembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(pathToDllAssembly);
Type methodsClassType = dllAssembly.GetType("YourMethodNamespace.YourMethodClass");
ConstructorInfo methodClassConstructorInfo = methodsClassType.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes);
object methodsClassObject = methodClassConstructorInfo.Invoke(new object[]{});
MethodInfo methodInfo = methodsClassType.GetMethod("invokeMethodsDynamically");
methodInfo.Invoke(methodsClassObject, new object[]{randomNumber});
*/
YourMethodClass.invokeMethodsDynamically(randomNumber, null);
}
}
}
Also for testing and observing, below link can be used.
https://repl.it/#erdsavasci/ReflectionTest

Can I use reflection with RealProxy instances?

I'm quite sure I'm missing some constraint or caveat somewhere, but here's my situation. Assume I have a class that I want to have a proxy for, like the following:
public class MyList : MarshalByRefObject, IList<string>
{
private List<string> innerList;
public MyList(IEnumerable<string> stringList)
{
this.innerList = new List<string>(stringList);
}
// IList<string> implementation omitted for brevity.
// For the sake of this exercise, assume each method
// implementation merely passes through to the associated
// method on the innerList member variable.
}
I want to create a proxy for that class, so that I can intercept method calls and perform some processing on the underlying object. Here is my implementation:
public class MyListProxy : RealProxy
{
private MyList actualList;
private MyListProxy(Type typeToProxy, IEnumerable<string> stringList)
: base(typeToProxy)
{
this.actualList = new MyList(stringList);
}
public static object CreateProxy(IEnumerable<string> stringList)
{
MyListProxy listProxy = new MyListProxy(typeof(MyList), stringList);
object foo = listProxy.GetTransparentProxy();
return foo;
}
public override IMessage Invoke(IMessage msg)
{
IMethodCallMessage callMsg = msg as IMethodCallMessage;
MethodInfo proxiedMethod = callMsg.MethodBase as MethodInfo;
return new ReturnMessage(proxiedMethod.Invoke(actualList, callMsg.Args), null, 0, callMsg.LogicalCallContext, callMsg);
}
}
Finally, I have a class that consumes the proxied class, and I set the value of the MyList member via reflection.
public class ListConsumer
{
public MyList MyList { get; protected set; }
public ListConsumer()
{
object listProxy = MyListProxy.CreateProxy(new List<string>() { "foo", "bar", "baz", "qux" });
PropertyInfo myListPropInfo = this.GetType().GetProperty("MyList");
myListPropInfo.SetValue(this, listProxy);
}
}
Now, if I try to use reflection to access the proxied object, I run into problems. Here is an example:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ListConsumer listConsumer = new ListConsumer();
// These calls merely illustrate that the property can be
// properly accessed and methods called through the created
// proxy without issue.
Console.WriteLine("List contains {0} items", listConsumer.MyList.Count);
Console.WriteLine("List contents:");
foreach(string stringValue in listConsumer.MyList)
{
Console.WriteLine(stringValue);
}
Type listType = listConsumer.MyList.GetType();
foreach (Type interfaceType in listType.GetInterfaces())
{
if (interfaceType.IsGenericType && interfaceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(ICollection<>))
{
// Attempting to get the value of the Count property via
// reflection throws an exception.
Console.WriteLine("Checking interface {0}", interfaceType.Name);
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo propInfo = interfaceType.GetProperty("Count");
int count = (int)propInfo.GetValue(listConsumer.MyList, null);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Skipping interface {0}", interfaceType.Name);
}
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
Attempting to call GetValue on the Count property via reflection throws the following exception:
An exception of type 'System.Reflection.TargetException' occurred in
mscorlib.dll but was not handled in user code
Additional information: Object does not match target type.
When attempting to get the value of the Count property, apparently the framework is calling down into System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime.IVector to call the get_Size method. I'm not understanding how this call fails on the underlying object of the proxy (the actual list) to make this happen. If I'm not using a proxy of the object, getting the property value works fine via reflection. What am I doing wrong? Can I even do what I'm trying to accomplish?
Edit: A bug has been opened regarding this issue at the Microsoft Connect site.

I think this may be a bug in the .Net framework. Somehow the RuntimePropertyInfo.GetValue method is picking the wrong implementation for the ICollection<>.Count property, and it appears to have to do with WindowsRuntime projections. Perhaps the remoting code was redone when they put the WindowsRuntime interop in the framework.
I switched the framework to target .Net 2.0 since I thought if this was a bug, it shouldn't be in that framework. When converting, Visual Studio removed the "Prefer 32 bit" check on my console exe project (since this doesn't exist in 2.0). It runs without exception when this is not present.
In summary, it runs on .Net 2.0 in both 32 and 64 bit. It runs on .Net 4.x in 64 bit. The exception is thrown on .Net 4.x 32 bit only. This sure looks like a bug. If you can run it 64-bit, that would be a workaround.
Note that I've installed .Net 4.6, and this replaces much of the .Net framework v4.x. It could be this is where the problem is introduced; I can't test until I get a machine that doesn't have .Net 4.6.
Update: 2015-09-08
It also happens on a machine with only .Net 4.5.2 installed (no 4.6).
Update: 2015-09-07
Here's a smaller repro, using your same classes:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var myList = MyListProxy.CreateProxy(new[] {"foo", "bar", "baz", "quxx"});
var listType = myList.GetType();
var interfaceType = listType.GetInterface("System.Collections.Generic.ICollection`1");
var propInfo = interfaceType.GetProperty("Count");
// TargetException thrown on 32-bit .Net 4.5.2+ installed
int count = (int)propInfo.GetValue(myList, null);
}
I've also tried the IsReadOnly property, but it appears to work (no exception).
As to the source of the bug, there are two layers of indirection around properties, one being the remoting, and the other being a mapping of metadata structures called MethodDefs with the actual runtime method, known internally as a MethodDesc. This mapping is specialized for properties (as well as events), where additional MethodDescs to support the property's get/set PropertyInfo instances are known as Associates. By calling PropertyInfo.GetValue we go through one of these Associate MethodDesc pointers to the underlying method implementation, and remoting does some pointer math to get the correct MethodDesc on the other side of the channel. The CLR code is very convoluted here, and I don't have enough experience of the in-memory layout of the MethodTable which holds these MethodDesc records which remoting uses (or the mapping it uses to get to the MethodTable?), but I'd say it's a fair guess that remoting is grabbing the wrong MethodDesc via some bad pointer math. That's why we see a similar but unrelated (as far as your program) MethodDesc - UInt32 get_Size of IVector<T> being invoked on the call:
System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.CheckConsistency(Object target)
System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.InvokeArgumentsCheck(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)
System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)
System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke(Object obj, Object[] parameters)
ConsoleApplication1.MyListProxy.Invoke(IMessage msg) Program.cs: line: 60
System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime.IVector`1.get_Size()
System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime.VectorToCollectionAdapter.Count[T]()

This is a pretty interesting CLR bug, some of its guts are showing in the mishap. You can tell from the stack trace that it is trying to call the VectorToCollectionAdapter's Count property.
This class is rather special, no instance of it ever gets created. It is part of the language projection that was added in .NET 4.5 that makes WinRT interface types look like .NET Framework types. It is pretty similar to the SZArrayHelper class, an adapter class that helps implement the illusion that non-generic arrays implement generic interface types like IList<T>.
The interface mapping at work here is for the WinRT IVector<T> interface. As noted in the MSDN article, that interface type is mapped to IList<T>. The internal VectorToListAdapter class takes care of the IList<T> members, VectorToCollectionAdapter tackles the ICollection<T> members.
Your code forces the CLR to find the implementation of ICollection<>.Count and that could either be a .NET class implementing it as normal or it could be a WinRT object that exposes it as IVector<>.Size. Clearly the proxy you created gives it a headache, it incorrectly decided for the WinRT version.
How it is supposed to figure out which is the correct choice is pretty murky. After all, your proxy could be a proxy for an actual WinRT object and then the choice it made would be correct. This could well be a structural problem. That it acts so randomly, the code does work in 64-bit mode, is not exactly inspiring. VectorToCollectionAdapter is very dangerous, note the JitHelpers.UnsafeCast calls, this bug is potentially exploitable.
Well, alert the authorities, file a bug report at connect.microsoft.com. Let me know if you don't want to take the time and I'll take care of it. A workaround is hard to come by, using the WinRT-centric TypeInfo class to do the reflection did not make any difference. Removing the jitter forcing so it runs in 64-bit mode is a band-aid but hardly a guarantee.

we are currently hacking around this problem with this brittle intervention (apologies for code):
public class ProxyBase : RealProxy
{
// ... stuff ...
public static T Cast<T>(object o)
{
return (T)o;
}
public static object Create(Type interfaceType, object coreInstance,
IEnforce enforce, string parentNamingSequence)
{
var x = new ProxyBase(interfaceType, coreInstance, enforce,
parentNamingSequence);
MethodInfo castMethod = typeof(ProxyBase).GetMethod(
"Cast").MakeGenericMethod(interfaceType);
return castMethod.Invoke(null, new object[] { x.GetTransparentProxy() });
}
public override IMessage Invoke(IMessage msg)
{
IMethodCallMessage methodCall = (IMethodCallMessage)msg;
var method = (MethodInfo)methodCall.MethodBase;
if(method.DeclaringType.IsGenericType
&& method.DeclaringType.GetGenericTypeDefinition().FullName.Contains(
"System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime"))
{
Dictionary<string, string> methodMap = new Dictionary<string, string>
{ // add problematic methods here
{ "Append", "Add" },
{ "GetAt", "get_Item" }
};
if(methodMap.ContainsKey(method.Name) == false)
{
throw new Exception("Unable to resolve '" + method.Name + "'.");
}
// thanks microsoft
string correctMethod = methodMap[method.Name];
method = m_baseInterface.GetInterfaces().Select(
i => i.GetMethod(correctMethod)).Where(
mi => mi != null).FirstOrDefault();
if(method == null)
{
throw new Exception("Unable to resolve '" + method.Name +
"' to '" + correctMethod + "'.");
}
}
try
{
if(m_coreInstance == null)
{
var errorMessage = Resource.CoreInstanceIsNull;
WriteLogs(errorMessage, TraceEventType.Error);
throw new NullReferenceException(errorMessage);
}
var args = methodCall.Args.Select(a =>
{
object o;
if(RemotingServices.IsTransparentProxy(a))
{
o = (RemotingServices.GetRealProxy(a)
as ProxyBase).m_coreInstance;
}
else
{
o = a;
}
if(method.Name == "get_Item")
{ // perform parameter conversions here
if(a.GetType() == typeof(UInt32))
{
return Convert.ToInt32(a);
}
return a;
}
return o;
}).ToArray();
// this is where it barfed
var result = method.Invoke(m_coreInstance, args);
// special handling for GetType()
if(method.Name == "GetType")
{
result = m_baseInterface;
}
else
{
// special handling for interface return types
if(method.ReturnType.IsInterface)
{
result = ProxyBase.Create(method.ReturnType, result, m_enforce, m_namingSequence);
}
}
return new ReturnMessage(result, args, args.Length, methodCall.LogicalCallContext, methodCall);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
WriteLogs("Exception: " + e, TraceEventType.Error);
if(e is TargetInvocationException && e.InnerException != null)
{
return new ReturnMessage(e.InnerException, msg as IMethodCallMessage);
}
return new ReturnMessage(e, msg as IMethodCallMessage);
}
}
// ... stuff ...
}
m_coreInstance here is the object instance that the proxy is wrapping.
m_baseInterface is the interface the object is to be used as.
this code intercepts the call(s) made in VectorToListAdapter and VectorToCollectionAdapter and converts it back into the original via that methodMap dictionary.
the part of the conditional:
method.DeclaringType.GetGenericTypeDefinition().FullName.Contains(
"System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime")
makes sure it only intercepts calls that come from stuff in the System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime namespace - ideally we would target the types directly but they are inaccessible - this should probably be changed to target specific class names in the namespace.
the parameters are then cast into the appropriate types and the method is invoked. the parameter conversions appear to be necessary as the incoming parameter types are based on the parameter types of the method calls from the objects in the System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime namespace, and not the parameters of the method calls to the original object types; i.e. the original types before the objects in the System.Runtime.InteropServices.WindowsRuntime namespace hijacked the mechanism.
for example, the WindowsRuntime stuff intercepts the original call to get_Item, and converts it into a call to the Indexer_Get method: http://referencesource.microsoft.com/#mscorlib/system/runtime/interopservices/windowsruntime/vectortolistadapter.cs,de8c78a8f98213a0,references. this method then calls the GetAt member with a different parameter type, which then calls GetAt on our object (again with a different parameter type) - this is the call we hijack in our Invoke() and convert it back into the original method call with the original parameter types.
it would be nice to be able to reflect over VectorToListAdapter and VectorToCollectionAdapter to extract all their methods and the nested calls they make, but these classes are unfortunately marked as internal.
this works for us here, but i'm sure its full of holes - it is a case of trial and error, running it to see what fails and then adding in the required dictionary entries/parameter conversions. we are continuing the search for a better solution.
HTH

How best to create and execute a method in a .NET (C#) class dynamically through configuration

I'm thinking of something along the lines of the "Inline Task" in MsBuild. For reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd722601.aspx
I'd like to find or create a framework which allows me to override a method via configuration. For example if I have a well known base class which has a method Execute(args), how can I supply an overridden method implementation at deployment time, without requiring new code, build, release cycle? I would like to actually plug in the method body into a config file or preferably a database table.
I assume this would be done either with code dom, dynamic language integration, or perhaps something like powershell(?). I'm looking for recommendations or perhaps a library someone has already written.
The application is written in C#. Preferably the extension would also be in C#, but I'm open to other ideas as well.
Update: Technically I don't even have to actually override a method. It would be sufficient to just be able to dynamically execute some external source code, passing in an arg and returning a result.
Update. I ended up writing code to instantiate a PowerShell object and execute a script dynamically to return a value. Here is a snippet of code I used.
public static Collection<PSObject> ExecuteScript(string code, string variableName, object variableValue)
{
PowerShell ps = PowerShell.Create();
ps.AddScript(code);
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(variableName))
{
ps.Runspace.SessionStateProxy.SetVariable(variableName, variableValue);
}
var result = ps.Invoke();
return result;
}
Then in the calling code, I simply check the first PSObject in the return value, and pull the resulting value from it. It works great. Thanks for all the responses.

Here are two examples of dynamic execution. I have used neither though so I can't comment further.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/evaluator.aspx
http://www.csharpfriends.com/articles/getarticle.aspx?articleid=118
Regarding namespaces, from the second article you can add assemblies through the CompilerParameter class.
// Create the C# compiler
CSharpCodeProvider csCompiler = new CSharpCodeProvider();
ICodeCompiler iCodeCompiler = csCompiler.CreateCompiler();
// input params for the compiler
CompilerParameters compilerParams = new CompilerParameters();
compilerParams.OutputAssembly = "CSharpFriends.dll";
compilerParams.ReferencedAssemblies.Add("system.dll");

One option would be to use Iron Python (or another DLR language). Your Execute method would then lookup the script in your configuration file, compile it and execute it all at runtime.
Including the necessary Iron Python assemblies with your project isn't a significant overhead.
You might need to do some plumbing to expose other parts of your application to the python runtime environment but this is quite easy to do.

You can use interfaces and then resolve the concrete classes at runtime e.g. using configuration files.
Check the various Dependency Injection Containers at http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ListOfNETDependencyInjectionContainersIOC.aspx

Managed Extensibility Framework (MEF) might be suitable as well. It was included as part of .NET 4.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd460648.aspx
http://mef.codeplex.com/
If the extensibility is just for one method then MEF would be overkill. If what you are extending will grow over time then I think MEF would provide the most robust and long-term manageable framework.

It looks like you might want to have a look at the Factory Pattern; returning delegates. Unfortunately you will need a type to 'house' the method, so you would typically generate code like:
namespace Dynamic {
public static int Foo(int bar) {
// .. Configured body here.
}
}
It's important that your factory does not generate methods it has seen before. Here is an example:
static class Delegates
{
private static Func<Func<int, string>> _test;
public static Func<int, string> Test
{
get
{
return _test();
}
}
static Delegates()
{
// Use your config variables instead of the "return arg.ToString();"
CreateFactory<Func<int, string>>(x => _test = x, "return arg.ToString();");
}
private static void CreateFactory<TDelegate>(Action<Func<TDelegate>> locationSetter, string identifier)
{
locationSetter(() =>
{
var result = Generate<TDelegate>(identifier);
locationSetter(() => result);
return result;
});
}
private static string GenerateSignature<TDelegate>()
{
// Create the signature of the delegate.
var t = typeof(TDelegate);
if (!typeof(Delegate).IsAssignableFrom(t))
throw new Exception("TDelegate must be delegate type.");
var invoke = t.GetMethod("Invoke");
var sig = new StringBuilder();
// Append the return type.
if (invoke.ReturnType == typeof(void))
sig.Append("void");
else
sig.Append(invoke.ReturnType.FullName);
sig.Append(" ");
sig.Append("Invoke(");
// Append the parameters.
var param = invoke.GetParameters();
for (var i = 0; i < param.Length; i++)
{
if (i != 0)
sig.Append(", ");
sig.Append(param[i].ParameterType.FullName);
sig.Append(" ");
sig.Append(param[i].Name);
}
sig.Append(")");
return sig.ToString();
}
private static TDelegate Generate<TDelegate>(string code)
{
// Generate the containing class and method.
var codeBuilder = new StringBuilder(50);
codeBuilder.AppendLine("using System;");
codeBuilder.Append("namespace Dynamic { class DynamicClass { public static ");
codeBuilder.Append(GenerateSignature<TDelegate>());
codeBuilder.AppendLine("{");
codeBuilder.AppendLine(code);
codeBuilder.AppendLine("} } }");
var compilerVersion = new Version(1, 0, 0, 0);
// Create the compiler parameters.
var parameters = new CompilerParameters();
parameters.GenerateInMemory = true;
parameters.GenerateExecutable = false;
parameters.ReferencedAssemblies.Clear();
foreach (var referenceAssembly in AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies())
{
parameters.ReferencedAssemblies.Add(referenceAssembly.Location);
// Figure out which version we are compiling against.
var an = new AssemblyName(referenceAssembly.FullName);
if (an.Name == "mscorlib" && compilerVersion < an.Version)
{
compilerVersion = an.Version;
}
}
var cp = new CSharpCodeProvider(
new Dictionary<string, string>() { { "CompilerVersion", string.Format("v{0}.{1}", compilerVersion.Major, compilerVersion.Minor) } }
);
var results = cp.CompileAssemblyFromSource(parameters, codeBuilder.ToString());
if (results.Errors.HasErrors)
throw new Exception("Method failed to compile.");
var assembly = results.CompiledAssembly;
if (assembly == null)
throw new Exception("Method failed to compile.");
var t = assembly.GetType("Dynamic.DynamicClass");
if (t == null)
throw new Exception("Method failed to compile.");
var m = t.GetMethod("Invoke");
if (m == null)
throw new Exception("Method failed to compile.");
return (TDelegate)(object)Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(TDelegate), m);
}
}

How to use reflection to call method by name

Hi I am trying to use C# reflection to call a method that is passed a parameter and in return passes back a result. How can I do that? I've tried a couple of things but with no success. I'm used to PHP and Python where this can be done on a single line so this is very confusing to me.
In essence this is how the call would be made without reflection:
response = service.CreateAmbience(request);
request has these objects:
request.UserId = (long)Constants.defaultAmbience["UserId"];
request.Ambience.CountryId = (long[])Constants.defaultAmbience["CountryId"];
request.Ambience.Name.DefaultText = (string)Constants.defaultAmbience["NameDefaultText"];
request.Ambience.Name.LanguageText = GetCultureTextLanguageText((string)Constants.defaultAmbience["NameCulture"], (string)Constants.defaultAmbience["NameText"]);
request.Ambience.Description.DefaultText = (string)Constants.defaultAmbience["DescriptionText"];
request.Ambience.Description.LanguageText = GetCultureTextLanguageText((string)Constants.defaultAmbience["DescriptionCulture"], (string)Constants.defaultAmbience["DescriptionDefaultText"]);
This is my function to implement the reflection where serviceAction for the case above would be "CreateAmbience":
public static R ResponseHelper<T,R>(T request, String serviceAction)
{
ICMSCoreContentService service = new ContentServiceRef.CMSCoreContentServiceClient();
R response = default(R);
response = ???
}

Something along the lines of:
MethodInfo method = service.GetType().GetMethod(serviceAction);
object result = method.Invoke(service, new object[] { request });
return (R) result;
You may well want to add checks at each level though, to make sure the method in question is actually valid, that it has the right parameter types, and that it's got the right return type. This should be enough to get you started though.

Here's a quick example of calling an object method by name using reflection:
Type thisType = <your object>.GetType();
MethodInfo theMethod = thisType.GetMethod(<The Method Name>);
theMethod.Invoke(this, <an object [] of parameters or null>);

If you're on .NET 4, use dynamic:
dynamic dService = service;
var response = dService.CreateAmbience(request);

You can use Delegate.CreateDelegate to obtain a delegate to the method by name:
public static R ResponseHelper<T,R>(T request, string serviceAction)
{
var service = new ContentServiceRef.CMSCoreContentServiceClient();
var func = (Func<T,R>)Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(Func<T,R>),
service,
serviceAction);
return func(request);
}

Object of type 'customObject' cannot be converted to type 'customObject'

I receive the following error when I invoke a custom object
"Object of type 'customObject' cannot be converted to type 'customObject'."
Following is the scenario when I am get this error:
I invoke a method in a dll dynamically.
Load an assembly
CreateInstance....
When calling MethodInfo.Invoke() passing int, string as a parameter for my method works fine => No exceptions are thrown.
But if I try and pass one of my own custom class objects as a parameter, then I get an ArgumentException exception, and it is not either an ArgumentOutOfRangeException or ArgumentNullException.
"Object of type 'customObject' cannot be converted to type 'customObject'."
I am doing this in a web application.
The class file containing the method is in a different project. Also the custom object is a separate class in the same file.
There is no such thing called a static assembly in my code. I am trying to invoke a webmethod dynamically. this webmethod is having the customObject type as an input parameter. So when i invoke the webmethod i am dynamically creating the proxy assembly and all. From the same assembly i am trying to create an instance of the cusotm object assinging the values to its properties and then passing this object as a parameter and invoking the method. everything is dynamic and nothing is created static.. :(
add reference is not used.
Following is a sample code i tried to create it
public static object CallWebService(string webServiceAsmxUrl, string serviceName, string methodName, object[] args)
{
System.Net.WebClient client = new System.Net.WebClient();
//-Connect To the web service
using (System.IO.Stream stream = client.OpenRead(webServiceAsmxUrl + "?wsdl"))
{
//--Now read the WSDL file describing a service.
ServiceDescription description = ServiceDescription.Read(stream);
///// LOAD THE DOM /////////
//--Initialize a service description importer.
ServiceDescriptionImporter importer = new ServiceDescriptionImporter();
importer.ProtocolName = "Soap12"; // Use SOAP 1.2.
importer.AddServiceDescription(description, null, null);
//--Generate a proxy client. importer.Style = ServiceDescriptionImportStyle.Client;
//--Generate properties to represent primitive values.
importer.CodeGenerationOptions = System.Xml.Serialization.CodeGenerationOptions.GenerateProperties;
//--Initialize a Code-DOM tree into which we will import the service.
CodeNamespace nmspace = new CodeNamespace();
CodeCompileUnit unit1 = new CodeCompileUnit();
unit1.Namespaces.Add(nmspace);
//--Import the service into the Code-DOM tree. This creates proxy code
//--that uses the service.
ServiceDescriptionImportWarnings warning = importer.Import(nmspace, unit1);
if (warning == 0) //--If zero then we are good to go
{
//--Generate the proxy code
CodeDomProvider provider1 = CodeDomProvider.CreateProvider("CSharp");
//--Compile the assembly proxy with the appropriate references
string[] assemblyReferences = new string[5] { "System.dll", "System.Web.Services.dll", "System.Web.dll", "System.Xml.dll", "System.Data.dll" };
CompilerParameters parms = new CompilerParameters(assemblyReferences);
CompilerResults results = provider1.CompileAssemblyFromDom(parms, unit1);
//-Check For Errors
if (results.Errors.Count > 0)
{
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
foreach (CompilerError oops in results.Errors)
{
sb.AppendLine("========Compiler error============");
sb.AppendLine(oops.ErrorText);
}
throw new System.ApplicationException("Compile Error Occured calling webservice. " + sb.ToString());
}
//--Finally, Invoke the web service method
Type foundType = null;
Type[] types = results.CompiledAssembly.GetTypes();
foreach (Type type in types)
{
if (type.BaseType == typeof(System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol))
{
Console.WriteLine(type.ToString());
foundType = type;
}
}
object wsvcClass = results.CompiledAssembly.CreateInstance(foundType.ToString());
MethodInfo mi = wsvcClass.GetType().GetMethod(methodName);
return mi.Invoke(wsvcClass, args);
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
}
I can't find anything static in what I do.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Phani Kumar PV

Have you looked at what the proxy class looks like that gets generated? You don't need the proxy to call a web service. Just create a class that inherits from SoapHttpClientProtocol and call Invoke(methodName, params).
You are making this SO much more complicated than you need to. Honestly.
EDIT
If you create a class like this:
public class SoapClient : SoapHttpClientProtocol
{
public SoapClient()
{
}
public object[] Invoke(string method, object[] args)
{
return base.Invoke(method, args);
}
}
and call it like this:
SoapClient soapClient = new SoapClient();
soapClient.Url = webServiceAsmxUrl;
soapClient.Invoke(methodName, args);
I think you will see that it has the exact same results as what you are doing.

Let me try to explain the most probable reason for the problem to come in my approach.
When I invoked a method in the assembly called as "methodname" in the webservice I am trying to pass the parameters required for that as args[] to the function "CallWebService"
This args[] when passed will be successfully working when I try to pass a normal parameters like primitive types including string.
But this is what I did when I tried to pass a custom object as a parameter.
Three things that are done in this.
create an object of that type outside the CallWebService function (using reflection). when I did that way what happens is an instance of the customobject created with a temporary dll name internally.
once I set the set the properties of the object and send it across to the CallWebService function as an object in the args array.
I tired to create an instance of the webservice by creating the dynamic dll.
object wsvcClass = results.CompiledAssembly.CreateInstance(foundType.ToString());
When I finally tried to invoke the method with the instance of the dynamic assembly created
I tried to pass the customobject that is created at step 1,2 via args property.
at the time of invocation the CLR tries to see if the customobject that is passed as input and the method that is being invoked are from the same DLL.
which is obviously not from the way the implementation is done.
So following is the approach that should be used to overcome the problem
I need to create the custom object assembly with the same assembly that I used to the create the webservice instance..
I implemented this approach completely and it worked out fine
MethodInfo m = type.GetMethod(methodName);
ParameterInfo[] pm = m.GetParameters();
object ob;
object[] y = new object[1];
foreach (ParameterInfo paraminfo in pm)
{
ob = this.webServiceAssembly.CreateInstance(paraminfo.ParameterType.Name);
//Some Junk Logic to get the set the values to the properties of the custom Object
foreach (PropertyInfo propera in ob.GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (propera.Name == "AppGroupid")
{
propera.SetValue(ob, "SQL2005Tools", null);
}
if (propera.Name == "Appid")
{
propera.SetValue(ob, "%", null);
}
}
y[0] = ob;
}

this can occur when the version of a dll you have referenced in your reflected code is different from the version of that dll in your compiled code.

This is an old thread, but I just had a similar problem. I looked on here, this one popped up, but I saw no useful solutions.
The OP's error was this: Object of type 'customObject' cannot be converted to type 'customObject'.
My very similar error was this: Object of type 'System.String' cannot be converted to type 'System.Windows.Forms.AccessibleRole'.
Here is how I solved my problem:
I performed a Find and Replace (use CRTL+SHIFT+F to bring the dialog box up) search in the Current Project for the term AccessibleRole.
Within one of the Form's Designer's was a place where I was assigning an AccessibleRole value to a String variable using ToString().
I fixed this, and my problem went away.
I hope this provides help to others.