We Keep Coding

Open Winforms screen after every one minute if the form is closed

A form should open only when there is an event if there is no event it should not display on the screen. So Basically i thought of using a timer to do this. An exe will continously be running and after every minute it checks the db to see if there is data and if there is it shows up on the screen and will only be closed manually with user interaction. After a minute it checks again and displays the form if Data is present in the DB.
I used system.threading.Timer in Program.cs file to open a window after every minute.Below is the code
timer = new System.Threading.Timer((s) => {
EL.CustomMessageBox l = new EL.CustomMessageBox();
l.ShowDialog();
}, null, TimeSpan.Zero, 60000);
After certain time I see that this exe is still running in the taskmanager but even though there is data in the DB it stops showing up on the screen. Any help is appreciated.

System.Threading.Timer runs its callback on a threadpool thread. You should never use a threadpool thread for UI work, because:
They don't run a message dispatch loop.
You don't control when the thread gets recycled. UI windows have thread affinity and if their thread exits all the associated windows go poof immediately (you won't even get WM_DESTROY messages).
A normal Application.Run loop on the main thread, with a hidden main window and a UI timer will serve you much better.

I would pass my own custom ApplicationContext to Application.Run() in program.cs.
This will allow you to have NO INTERFACE until your conditions are met. The application will also continue to run (even when you close the Forms) until you explicitly call Application.Exit().
You can keep a reference to your Form at class level. This will help you decide if you need to work with the existing one, or create a new one.
Note that I'm using the System.Windows.Forms.Timer, not the threaded timer.
Something like...
static class Program
{
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new MyContext());
}
}
public class MyContext : ApplicationContext
{
private EL.CustomMessageBox l = null;
private System.Windows.Forms.Timer timer;
public MyContext()
{
timer = new System.Windows.Forms.Timer();
timer.Interval = (int)TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1).TotalMilliseconds;
timer.Tick += Timer_Tick;
timer.Start();
}
private void Timer_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
bool result = true; // hit the database and get an answer
if (result)
{
if (l == null || l.IsDisposed)
{
// no form has been created yet, or the previous one was closed
// create a new instance
l = new EL.CustomMessageBox();
l.Show();
}
else
{
// if we get in here, then the previous form is still being displayed
// if your form can be minimized, you might need to restore it
// if (l.WindowState == FormWindowState.Minimized)
// {
// restore the window in here?
// }
}
// update the form "l" with some data?
l.xxx = yyy;
}
}
}

I can't help but think that the other answers, massively technically correct as they are, don't actually solve the problem because they probably don't make sense if you aren't aware of how Windows works. Idle_Mind's is closest to what I'd do, though if the forms designer is familiar I'd go for a solution that basically just uses that - as such I present what I would do to solve the task you're faced with:
Have an app with one form (or make this form an autonomous one within another app, but for now maybe do it as a dedicated app for simplicity) - make a new Windows Forms project
Have a Timer (a Windows Forms timer, out of the toolbox, not a System.Threading timer) with an interval of 60000 and Enabled = true
Have a timer Tick event handler on your form (double click the timer in the tray under the form designer to attach an event handler) that queries the DB and finds if there are any messages
If there are new messages, adds them to a listbox or something, and calls this.Show() to show the form
Have an eventhandler attached to the FormClosing event so when the user clicks X, the form hides instead of closes:
private void MyForm_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e)
{
if (e.CloseReason == CloseReason.UserClosing)
{
e.Cancel = true;
Hide();
}
}
Maybe have the FormClosing event clear the messages listbox. This way if the form opens and the user is on lunch, the messages will build up and build up, then they can read them and clear them by closing the form. Calling Show on an already-visible form does nothing, so the messages will just accumulate into the listbox if more messages come in and the form is already visible
Good quick rule of thumb; never use System.Threading Timer in a Windows Forms app. Use a timer out of the forms designer toolbox instead. Only use a threading timer if you're writing a service or Console app etc. For stability reasons, Windows controls absolutely must be accessed by the thread that originally created the control. Windows forms timer is aware of this and its Tick event can safely access the controls (a form is a control, showing it requires to access it) in a Forms app

You should call Invoke to execute your delegate on the thread that owns the control's underlying window handle.
Something like this should work:
timer = new System.Threading.Timer((s) => {
EL.CustomMessageBox l = new EL.CustomMessageBox();
l.Invoke((Action) () =>
{
l.ShowDialog();
});
}, null, TimeSpan.Zero, 60000);
Or even better, use this extension method:
public static void InvokeIfRequired(this Control c, MethodInvoker action)
{
if (c.InvokeRequired)
{
c.Invoke(action);
}
else
{
action();
}
}
And call it like this:
l.InvokeIfRequired(() => { l.ShowDialog(); });
Further information can be found at: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/desktop/winforms/controls/how-to-make-thread-safe-calls-to-windows-forms-controls?view=netframeworkdesktop-4.8

How do I know if Process.WaitForExit() expired due to main application close

I have a C# console program "A" to monitor 4 instances of another application "B".
The console program creates one thread per instance of "B", and each thread launches "B" using Process.Start(). Then the thread waits 3 seconds using Process.WaitForExit(3000);
After that time, it checks if the instance of the application "B" is working. If it is ok, then waits again. Otherwise, if it doesn't work or if it has finished, it relaunches it. When the user closes the console program, all applications are expected to end.
However, when the application "A" is closed using the console's close button, WaitForExit() is resumed in all threads and it causes the applications "B" to be relaunched.
I would like to detect if WaitForExit() resumed due to a failure of the monitored application "B", or because the main app "A" is exiting. In this case, the application "B" won't be relaunched, and the problem will be solved.
I tried to capture the closing event using:
[DllImport("Kernel32")]
public static extern bool SetConsoleCtrlHandler(HandlerRoutine Handler, bool Add);
The problem was that WaitForExit() was resumed before the handler routine is called.
More information:
The Main() method launches the Threads:
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
Thread t = new Thread(() => MonitorizeApp(arguments));
t.IsBackground = true;
t.Start();
}
I also tried to change the threads from background to foreground, so that main app doesn't exit, but the result is the same.
Each thread launches and monitorizes one instance of the 2nd application:
MonitorizeApp(string arguments)
{
LaunchProcess(arguments);
while(!_closing)
{
appProcess.WaitForExit(3000);
if (!_closing)
{
if ((appProcess != null) && (!appProcess.HasExited))
DoSomeMonitoring();
else
{
Console.WriteLine("WARNING: The application finished");
Thread.Sleep(500);
if (!_closing)
{
Console.WriteLine("Re-launch");
LaunchProcess(arguments);
inicial = true;
}
}
}
}
Console.WriteLine("\nClosing...\n");
if(appProcess != null)
{
if(!appProcess.HasExited)
appProcess.Kill();
appProcess.Dispose();
}
}
_closing is a variable set from the main thread, when the console is closed.
I did this using SetConsoleCtrlHandler:
[DllImport("Kernel32")]
public static extern bool SetConsoleCtrlHandler(HandlerRoutine Handler, bool Add);
public delegate bool HandlerRoutine(CtrlTypes CtrlType);
private static bool ConsoleCtrlCheck(CtrlTypes ctrlType)
{
MonitoredApp.closing = true;
Thread.Sleep(1000);
closing = true;
Environment.Exit(-1);
return true;
}

I suspect your only option is to have the main program's exit routine check to see if any of the child processes are running and, if so, terminate them. I'm a little surprised that your 500 ms sleep followed by the _closing check doesn't catch this. Although, looking at your code example I don't see a _closing flag being set (unless _closing is the backing field for MonitoredApp.closing).
You might consider changing that _closing boolean to a ManualResetEvent that the main program sets. It's quite possible that the compiler is optimizing away the check of _closing. You could also mark _closing as volatile, which might change the behavior. Remember, this stuff is all happening asynchronously, so you have to worry about race conditions.
Even with that, you'll likely still run into problems and you'll have to make sure that the main application closes all existing child processes before it exits. You simply cannot guarantee in what order the operating system is going to shut things down.
You could avoid the problem by disabling the close button. See my blog entry, http://blog.mischel.com/2008/07/14/going-too-far-back/, for an example. If you delete the Close menu item, clicking the X won't close the window.
Of course, then your users will have to type the exit command in your window. And you might still have problems if the user closes the window from Task Manager or some other such application.

Why does closing a console that was started with AllocConsole cause my whole application to exit? Can I change this behavior?

What I want to have happen is that the console window just goes away, or better yet that it is hidden, but I want my application to keep running. Is that possible? I want to be able to use Console.WriteLine and have the console serve as an output window. I want to be able to hide and show it, and I don't want the whole app to die just because the console was closed.
EDIT
Code:
internal class SomeClass {
[DllImport("kernel32")]
private static extern bool AllocConsole();
private static void Main() {
AllocConsole();
while(true) continue;
}
}
EDIT 2
I tried the accepted solution here [ Capture console exit C# ], per the suggestion in the comments on this question. The example code is bugged in that the DLLImport needs to be "kernel32.dll" or "kernel32", not "Kernel32". After making that change, I'm getting a message to my handler for CTRL_CLOSE_EVENT when I click the X on the console window. However, calling FreeConsole and/or returning true doesn't prevent the application from terminating.

Ah, yes, this is one of the caveats of using the Windows console subsystem. When the user closes the console window (regardless of how the console was allocated), all of the processes that are attached to the console are terminated. That behavior makes obvious sense for console applications (i.e., those that specifically target the console subsystem, as opposed to standard Windows applications), but it can be a major pain in cases like yours.
The only workaround that I know of is to use the SetConsoleCtrlHandler function, which allows you to register a handler function for Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Break signals, as well as system events like the user closing the console window, the user logging off, or the system shutting down. The documentation says that if you're only interested in ignoring these events, you can pass null for the first argument. For example:
[DllImport("kernel32")]
static extern bool SetConsoleCtrlHandler(HandlerRoutine HandlerRoutine, bool Add);
delegate bool HandlerRoutine(uint dwControlType);
static void Main()
{
AllocConsole();
SetConsoleCtrlHandler(null, true);
while (true) continue;
}
That works perfectly for Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Break signals (which would have otherwise caused your application to terminate as well), but it doesn't work for the one you're asking about, which is the CTRL_CLOSE_EVENT, generated by the system when the user closes the console window.
Honestly, I don't know how to prevent that. Even the sample in the SDK doesn't actually allow you to ignore the CTRL_CLOSE_EVENT. I tried it in a little test app, and it beeps when you close the window and prints the message, but the process still gets terminated.
Perhaps more worryingly, the documentation makes me think it is not possible to prevent this:
The system generates CTRL_CLOSE_EVENT, CTRL_LOGOFF_EVENT, and CTRL_SHUTDOWN_EVENT signals when the user closes the console, logs off, or shuts down the system so that the process has an opportunity to clean up before termination. Console functions, or any C run-time functions that call console functions, may not work reliably during processing of any of the three signals mentioned previously. The reason is that some or all of the internal console cleanup routines may have been called before executing the process signal handler.
It's that last sentence that catches my eye. If the console subsystem starts cleaning up after itself immediately in response to the user attempting to close the window, it may not be possible to halt it after the fact.
(At least now you understand the problem. Maybe someone else can come along with a solution!)

Unfortunately there's nothing you can do to really alter this behaviour.
Console windows are "special" in that they're hosted by another process and do not allow sub-classing. This limits your ability to modify their behaviour.
From what I know, your two options are:
1. Disable the close button altogether. You can do this with the following code fragment:
HWND hwnd = ::GetConsoleWindow();
if (hwnd != NULL)
{
HMENU hMenu = ::GetSystemMenu(hwnd, FALSE);
if (hMenu != NULL) DeleteMenu(hMenu, SC_CLOSE, MF_BYCOMMAND);
}
2. Stop using consoles altogether, and implement your own text output solution.
Option #2 is the more complicated option but would provide you the greatest control. I found an article on CodeProject that implements a console-like application using a rich edit control to display the text (rich edit controls have the ability to stream text like the console, so they are well suited to this sort of application).

On closing the console window obtained using AllocConsole or AttachConsole, the associated process will exit. There is no escape from that.
Prior to Windows Vista, closing the console window would present a confirmation dialogue to the user asking him whether the process should be terminated or not but Windows Vista and later do not provide any such dialogue and the process gets terminated.
One possible solution to work around this is avoiding AttachConsole altogether and achieving the desired functionality through other means.
For instance in the case described by OP, console window was needed to output some text on Console using Console static class.
This can be achieved very easily using inter-process communication. For example a console application can be developed to act as an echo server
namespace EchoServer
{
public class PipeServer
{
public static void Main()
{
var pipeServer = new NamedPipeServerStream(#"Com.MyDomain.EchoServer.PipeServer", PipeDirection.In);
pipeServer.WaitForConnection();
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(pipeServer);
try
{
int i = 0;
while (i >= 0)
{
i = reader.Read();
if (i >= 0)
{
Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(i));
}
}
}
catch (IOException)
{
//error handling code here
}
finally
{
pipeServer.Close();
}
}
}
}
and then instead of allocating/attaching a console to the current application, the echo server can be started from within the application and Console's output stream can be redirected to write to the pipe server.
class Program
{
private static NamedPipeClientStream _pipeClient;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//Current application is a Win32 application without any console window
var processStartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo("echoserver.exe");
Process serverProcess = new Process {StartInfo = processStartInfo};
serverProcess.Start();
_pipeClient = new NamedPipeClientStream(".", #"Com.MyDomain.EchoServer.PipeServer", PipeDirection.Out, PipeOptions.None);
_pipeClient.Connect();
StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(_pipeClient) {AutoFlush = true};
Console.SetOut(writer);
Console.WriteLine("Testing");
//Do rest of the work.
//Also detect that the server has terminated (serverProcess.HasExited) and then close the _pipeClient
//Also remember to terminate the server process when current process exits, serverProcess.Kill();
while (true)
continue;
}
}
This is just one of the possible solutions. In essence the work around is to allot the console window to its own process so that it can terminate without affecting the parent process.

You can do this by disabling keyboard mouse input by external program called Keyfreez.
you can use it multiple times in your program where no user input required. And if any user input require u can add a process Takskkill /f /IM .
https://www.sordum.org/7921/bluelife-keyfreeze-v1-4-block-keyboard-and-mouse/
Hope this helps all of you

Application.Current "null" in console application

I'm currently trying to use a WPF component that makes use of Application.Current from a WPF application, however due to several reasons I never call Application.Run (nor is that an option). The result is a NullReferenceException.
I'm basically trying to display multiple instances of the same WPF window from what would be a console application.
Any advice (and code samples in C#/F#) would be welcome!
Thanks in advance

Just to offer an alternative solution.
It is possible to keep an application running without any windows open. To me this feels less 'hackish'. :) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.application.shutdownmode.aspx
public class AppCode : Application
{
// Entry point method
[STAThread]
public static void Main()
{
AppCode app = new AppCode();
app.ShutdownMode = ShutdownMode.OnExplicitShutdown;
app.Run();
...
app.Shutdown();
}
}
EDIT:
Ok this got a bit cumbersome. Application.Run will block, so it needs to run in its own thread.
When it does run in its own thread, any interaction between your main thread and your ui thread had best be done by Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke. Here is some working code, that assumes you have a class that inherits from Application. I'm using a modified App.xaml/App.xaml.cs that a WPF project template creates for you, to get nice handling of ResourceDictionaries for free.
public class Program
{
// Entry point method
[STAThread]
public static void Main()
{
var thread = new System.Threading.Thread(CreateApp);
thread.SetApartmentState(System.Threading.ApartmentState.STA);
thread.Start();
// This is kinda shoddy, but the thread needs some time
// before we can invoke anything on the dispatcher
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100);
// In order to get input from the user, display a
// dialog and return the result on the dispatcher
var result = (int)Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(new Func<int>(() =>
{
var win = new MainWindow();
win.ShowDialog();
return 10;
}), null);
// Show something to the user without waiting for a result
Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(new Action(() =>
{
var win = new MainWindow();
win.ShowDialog();
}), null);
System.Console.WriteLine("result" + result);
System.Console.ReadLine();
// This doesn't really seem necessary
Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeShutdown();
}
private static void CreateApp()
{
App app = new App();
app.ShutdownMode = ShutdownMode.OnExplicitShutdown;
app.Run();
}
}

The following is the intended behavior of Application class:
The first open window is the MainWindow.
The only window in the list becomes the MainWindow (if others are to
be removed).
Application Class is designed to exit if no windows are present in
windows list.
Check this link.
So basically you cannot run an Application, without any window open. Keep a window open but hidden.
If I have misunderstood your problem, then perhaps the following similar cases might help:
Managing Application Resources when WPF is Hosted.
When running unit tests in Visual Studio 2008

Displaying a form locks up mono

I've got a mono app written in c# and executed on a Mac using "mono myapp.exe"
The app itself is a "Windows Application" when viewed from the project properties, but it doesn't always show a window. In program.cs, there is a static Main:
static void Main(string[] args) {
UserClient client = new UserClient();
client.Start(args);
}
public class UserClient {
public void Start(string[] args) {
// Talk to server, listen for instructions, etc.
....
// Launch the "Stay Alive" thread
// Just a thread that Sleeps/Loops watching for an exit command; mainly used to keep the process alive
}
}
Inside the UserClient's Start method, there is a piece of code that continuously monitors a server which gives it instructions to do things. One of the things it does is optionally displays a message using a windows form.
When the server instructs the process to display a message, it instantiates a form, displays it using frm.ShowDialog() and then after 30 seconds, a timer on the form runs Close() and the frm then gets disposed. However, when this happens, on my Mac I see an application title bar saying "mono" and a new icon on my dock bar for the mono app. After about 2 minutes the mono process in Activity Monitor shows "Not Responding." This eventually will prevent the user from logging out, shutting down, etc. (because Mac OS can't kill mono gracefully).
ON THE OTHER HAND... if the server never tells the process to display that form, everything runs fine and dandy: a dock icon never shows up (which is good!), mono title bar never shows up and the mono process continues to run happily, not preventing the system from shutting down or rebooting.
Anyone experienced this or have ideas on what's causing it? My guess is that it's a new GUI thread being created by the form which isn't ever being shutdown and is somehow causing a lockup, though I'm unsure of how to handle it.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Update:
Here's some code to easily reproduce and see this happening. I realize that this seems kind of "non-standard." Having said that, the below works perfectly in a Windows environment and provides the desired result of not showing an icon in the task area except when showing a message. Currently, using Application.Run and simply doing frm.ShowDialog() produce exactly the same result.
In the end what we need is to be able to display the form, then destroy the form and any associated icon from the dock. I suspect the GUI is starting a thread which isn't ever being disposed, which is why the dock icon remains. Is there a way to make sure the GUI thread is taken care of?
static class Program {
static void Main() {
StartupClass s = new StartupClass();
s.start();
}
}
public class StartupClass {
Thread stayAliveThread;
public void start() {
// Stay alive thread
stayAliveThread = new Thread(stayAliveLoop);
stayAliveThread.Start();
// This shows a form and would normally be used to display temporary and brief messages to the user. Close the message and you'll see the undesired functionality.
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new Form1());
Application.Exit();
Application.ExitThread();
}
/// <summary>
/// Keep the app alive.
/// </summary>
private void stayAliveLoop() {
while (true) {
Thread.Sleep(10000);
// In the real project this method monitors the server and performs other tasks, only sometimes displaying a message.
}
}
}

I feel I'm missing several things. Most notably
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args) { //....
Also see this answer: Windows Forms and ShowDialog problem

I can't see anything like initializing message loop for windowed application. I.e. in windows forms case something like Application.Run(). If you do not have it, no wonder application freezes. In any case, posting more code could be helpful, as stated in comment.

In the end, I couldn't resolve this. I created a process that launched another app which displayed the message form. Not really a true answer, but the solution I had to go with.