enter code hereI have a ScrollViewer in Silverlight that is not scrolling vertically whenever I call the ScrollToVerticalOffset method from the code behind.
Basically, I have my View (UserControl) that contains the ScrollViewer. I invoke an action from my ViewModel that triggers an event in the View's code-behind that sets the VerticalOffset to a specific value.
First of all, I know this is very ugly. Ideally I wish that I could have an attachable property that I could bind to a property in my ViewModel, that, when set, would cause the VerticalOffset property (which I know is read-only) to be updated, and the ScrollViewer to scroll.
The ScrollViewer contains dynamic content. So, if the user is viewing content in the ScrollViewer, and scrolls half-way down, and then clicks on a button, new content is loaded into the ScrollViewer. The problem is that the ScrollViewer's vertical offset doesn't get reset, so the user has to scroll up to read the content. So, my solution was to be able to control the vertical offset from the ViewModel, and I have racked my brain and can't come up with a viable solution, so I am looking for someone to help, please.
By the way - I have included code from a class I put together for an attachable property. This property binds to a property in my ViewModel. When I set the property in the ViewModel, it correctly triggers the PropertyChanged callback method in this class, which then calls the ScrollToVerticalOffset method for the ScrollViewer, but the ScrollViewer still doesn't scroll.
public class ScrollViewerHelper
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty BindableOffsetProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("BindableOffset", typeof(double), typeof(ScrollViewerHelper),
new PropertyMetadata(OnBindableOffsetChanged));
public static double GetBindableOffset(DependencyObject d)
{
return (double)d.GetValue(BindableOffsetProperty);
}
public static void SetBindableOffset(DependencyObject d, double value)
{
d.SetValue(BindableOffsetProperty, value);
}
private static void OnBindableOffsetChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
ScrollViewer scrollViewer = d as ScrollViewer;
if (scrollViewer != null)
{
scrollViewer.ScrollToVerticalOffset((double)e.NewValue);
}
}
}
This approach is a little bit funky in my opinion, as I think of both a ScrollViewer and a VerticalScrollOffset as "View" entities that should have very little (or nothing) to do with a ViewModel. It seems like this might be forcing MVVM a little too much, and creating a lot of extra work in creating an attached dependency property and basically trying to keep a bound Offset ViewModel property in sync with the readonly VerticalScrollOffset of the ScrollViewer.
I am not exactly sure of what you are trying to achieve, but it sounds like you are trying to scroll to a specified offset when some dynamic element is added to the underlying panel of your ScrollViewer. Personally, I would just want to handle this behavior with a little bit of code in my View and forget about tying it to the ViewModel.
One really nice way to do this type of thing in Silverlight 3 is with Blend behaviors. You write a little bit of behavior code in C# and then can attach it declaratively to an element in XAML. This keeps it reusable and out of your code-behind. Your project will have to reference the System.Windows.Interactivity DLL which is part of the Blend SKD.
Here's a simple example of a simple Blend behavior you could add to a ScrollViewer which scrolls to a specified offset whenever the size of the underlying content of the ScrollViewer changes:
public class ScrollToOffsetBehavior : Behavior<ScrollViewer>
{
private FrameworkElement contentElement = null;
public static readonly DependencyProperty OffsetProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"Offset",
typeof(double),
typeof(ScrollToOffsetBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata(0.0));
public double Offset
{
get { return (double)GetValue(OffsetProperty); }
set { SetValue(OffsetProperty, value); }
}
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
if (this.AssociatedObject != null)
{
this.AssociatedObject.Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler(AssociatedObject_Loaded);
}
}
protected override void OnDetaching()
{
base.OnDetaching();
if (this.contentElement != null)
{
this.contentElement.SizeChanged -= contentElement_SizeChanged;
}
if (this.AssociatedObject != null)
{
this.AssociatedObject.Loaded -= AssociatedObject_Loaded;
}
}
void AssociatedObject_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
this.contentElement = this.AssociatedObject.Content as FrameworkElement;
if (this.contentElement != null)
{
this.contentElement.SizeChanged += new SizeChangedEventHandler(contentElement_SizeChanged);
}
}
void contentElement_SizeChanged(object sender, SizeChangedEventArgs e)
{
this.AssociatedObject.ScrollToVerticalOffset(this.Offset);
}
}
You could then apply this behavior to the ScrollViewer in XAML (and specify an offset of 0 to scroll back to the top):
<ScrollViewer>
<i:Interaction.Behaviors>
<local:ScrollToOffsetBehavior Offset="0"/>
</i:Interaction.Behaviors>
...Scroll Viewer Content...
</ScrollViewer>
This would be assuming that you always want to scroll to the offset whenever the content size changes. This may not be exactly what you are looking for, but it is one example of how something like this can be done in the view using a behavior.
Related
There is my WPF window in which I placed an ordinary textbox which I would liked to be focused when Ctrl+F is pressed.
As I would like to keep it MVVM-like as much as possible, I use InputBindings on the window to bind that input event to a Command provided in the ViewModel (is that already breaking MVVM pattern because the whole action is only meant to be part of the view? I guess not, as the Command is an object to bind to).
How can the ViewModel communicate with the view to focus the textbox? I read that this already breaks the MVVM pattern, but sometimes simply is necessary as otherwise impossible. However, setting the focus in the ViewModel itself would be totally breaking the MVVM pattern.
I orginally intended to bind the current focused control in the window to a property of the ViewModel but it is quite difficult to even determine the currently focused element in WPF (that always makes me question if it really is the right way to do so).
In cases like this there's just no way to not 'break' pure MVVM. Then again, I'd hardly call it breaking anything. I don't think any decently sized MVVM app out there is 'pure'. So, just stop caring too much about breaking whatever pattern you use and implement a solution instead.
There are at least two ways here:
simply do everything in code behind in the View: check if the key is pressed, if so, set focus. It won't get any simpler than that and you could argue the VM has nothing to do with something that's really all View related
else there is obviously going to have to be some communication between VM and View. And this makes everything more complicated: suppose you use the InputBinding, your command can set a boolean property and then the View can bind to it in turn to set focus. That binding can be done like in Sheridan's answer with an attached property.
Generally, when we want to use any UI event while adhering to the MVVM methodology, we create an Attached Property. As I just answered this very same question yesterday, I would advise you to take a look at the how to set focus to a wpf control using mvvm post here on StackOverflow for a full working code example.
The only difference from that question to yours is that you want to focus the element on a key press... I'm going to assume that you know how to do that part, but if you can't, just let me know and I'll give you an example of that too.
when using mvvm and further when you define a viewmodel with:
a viewmodel should not know/reference the view
then you cant set focus through the viewmodel.
but what i do in mvvm is the following in the viewmodel:
set the focus to the element which is bind to the viewmodel property
for this i create a behavior which simply walk through all control in the visual tree and look for the binding expressions path. and if i find a path expression then simply focus the uielement.
EDIT:
xaml usage
<UserControl>
<i:Interaction.Behaviors>
<Behaviors:OnLoadedSetFocusToBindingBehavior BindingName="MyFirstPropertyIWantToFocus" SetFocusToBindingPath="{Binding Path=FocusToBindingPath, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</i:Interaction.Behaviors>
</UserControl>
viemodel in any method
this.FocusToBindingPath = "MyPropertyIWantToFocus";
behavior
public class SetFocusToBindingBehavior : Behavior<FrameworkElement>
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty SetFocusToBindingPathProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("SetFocusToBindingPath", typeof(string), typeof(SetFocusToBindingBehavior ), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(SetFocusToBindingPathPropertyChanged));
public string SetFocusToBindingPath
{
get { return (string)GetValue(SetFocusToBindingPathProperty); }
set { SetValue(SetFocusToBindingPathProperty, value); }
}
private static void SetFocusToBindingPathPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var behavior = d as SetFocusToBindingBehavior;
var bindingpath = (e.NewValue as string) ?? string.Empty;
if (behavior == null || string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(bindingpath))
return;
behavior.SetFocusTo(behavior.AssociatedObject, bindingpath);
//wenn alles vorbei ist dann binding path zurücksetzen auf string.empty,
//ansonsten springt PropertyChangedCallback nicht mehr an wenn wieder zum gleichen Propertyname der Focus gesetzt werden soll
behavior.SetFocusToBindingPath = string.Empty;
}
private void SetFocusTo(DependencyObject obj, string bindingpath)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(bindingpath))
return;
var ctrl = CheckForBinding(obj, bindingpath);
if (ctrl == null || !(ctrl is IInputElement))
return;
var iie = (IInputElement) ctrl;
ctrl.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke((Action)(() =>
{
if (!iie.Focus())
{
//zb. bei IsEditable=true Comboboxen funzt .Focus() nicht, daher Keyboard.Focus probieren
Keyboard.Focus(iie);
if (!iie.IsKeyboardFocusWithin)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Focus konnte nicht auf Bindingpath: " + bindingpath + " gesetzt werden.");
var tNext = new TraversalRequest(FocusNavigationDirection.Next);
var uie = iie as UIElement;
if (uie != null)
{
uie.MoveFocus(tNext);
}
}
}
}), DispatcherPriority.Background);
}
public string BindingName { get; set; }
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
AssociatedObject.Loaded += AssociatedObjectLoaded;
}
protected override void OnDetaching()
{
base.OnDetaching();
AssociatedObject.Loaded -= AssociatedObjectLoaded;
}
private void AssociatedObjectLoaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
SetFocusTo(AssociatedObject, this.BindingName);
}
private DependencyObject CheckForBinding(DependencyObject obj, string bindingpath)
{
var properties = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(obj, new Attribute[] { new PropertyFilterAttribute(PropertyFilterOptions.All) });
if (obj is IInputElement && ((IInputElement) obj).Focusable)
{
foreach (PropertyDescriptor property in properties)
{
var prop = DependencyPropertyDescriptor.FromProperty(property);
if (prop == null) continue;
var ex = BindingOperations.GetBindingExpression(obj, prop.DependencyProperty);
if (ex == null) continue;
if (ex.ParentBinding.Path.Path == bindingpath)
return obj;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(obj); i++)
{
var result = CheckForBinding(VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(obj, i),bindingpath);
if (result != null)
return result;
}
return null;
}
}
(is that already breaking MVVM pattern because the whole action is
only meant to be part of the view? I guess not, as the Command is an
object to bind to)
The Command system in WPF was actually not designed around data-binding, but the UI -- using RoutedCommands, a single command would have different implementations based on the physical position in the UI structure of the element that called the command.
Commanding Overview
Your flow would be:
Ctrl+F is pressed
command event is raised and bubbles up
the event reaches the window, which has a CommandBinding to the command
event handler on the window focuses the text box
If the current element is inside a container that wants to handle the command differently, it will stop there before it reaches the window.
This is probably closer to what you want. It may make sense to involve the view model if there is some concept of an "active property" like in blindmeis's answer, but otherwise I think you would just end up with a redundant / circular flow of information e.g. key pressed -> view informs viewmodel of keypress -> viewmodel responds by informing view of keypress.
After a few days of getting a better grip on all of this, considering and evaluating all options, I finally found a way to work it out. I add a command binding in my window markup:
<Window.InputBindings>
<KeyBinding Command="{Binding Focus}" CommandParameter="{Binding ElementName=SearchBox}" Gesture="CTRL+F" />
</Window.InputBindings>
The command in my ViewModel (I cut the class down to what matters in this case):
class Overview : Base
{
public Command.FocusUIElement Focus
{
get;
private set;
}
public Overview( )
{
this.Focus = new Command.FocusUIElement();
}
}
And finally the command itself:
class FocusUIElement : ICommand
{
public event EventHandler CanExecuteChanged;
public bool CanExecute ( object parameter )
{
return true;
}
public void Execute ( object parameter )
{
System.Windows.UIElement UIElement = ( System.Windows.UIElement ) parameter;
UIElement.Focus();
}
}
This might not be straigt MVVM - but stijn's answer has a good point:
So, just stop caring too much about breaking whatever pattern you use
and implement a solution instead.
Normally I take care of keeping stuff organised by conventions, especially when I am still new to something, but I do not see anything wrong regarding this.
I'm trying to show a vertical line in position X of the cursor. I'm trying to do that in a slider control, but I couldn't made it. This will be showed while the user has its cursor on it.
I only know that I need to modify the template. Is so much difficult to do that? If not, can you help me?
Thanks.
This is not easy to attain using templating because of the fact that mouse position is not a dependency property and mouse move is not a routed event. This really comes down to what you want to do, if it's to just show a vertical line whether the mouse is then I agree with Dany to use adorners, as you're not really interested in the slider itself. However, if it's to move the thumb to where the mouse is I would use an attached property.
The reason I use attached properties rather than hooking up the events directly on the control is that it provides more modularised and reusable codebase and makes it more obvious of the visual effect in the XAML, rather than needing to look at C# code as well.
Here's what I would suggest
public class SliderHelperPackage
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty BindThumbToMouseProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"BindThumbToMouse", typeof(bool), typeof(SliderHelperPackage), new PropertyMetadata(false, OnBindThumbToMouseChanged));
public static void SetBindThumbToMouse(UIElement element, bool value)
{
element.SetValue(BindThumbToMouseProperty, value);
}
public static bool GetBindThumbToMouse(UIElement element)
{
return (bool)element.GetValue(BindThumbToMouseProperty);
}
private static void OnBindThumbToMouseChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.NewValue.Equals(e.OldValue))
return;
var slider = d as Slider;
if (slider == null)
throw new ArgumentException(#"dependency object must be a slider", "d");
if ((bool) e.NewValue)
{
slider.MouseMove += SliderMouseMove;
}
else
{
slider.MouseMove -= SliderMouseMove;
}
}
static void SliderMouseMove(object sender, MouseEventArgs e)
{
var slider = (Slider) sender;
var position = e.GetPosition(slider);
// When the mouse moves, we update the slider's value so it's where the ticker is (we take into account margin's on the track)
slider.Value = (slider.Maximum - slider.Minimum)*Math.Max(position.X-5,0)/(slider.ActualWidth-10) + slider.Minimum;
}
}
And you can then use it in your XAML like so. So when you set this to true we hook up to the mouse move event on the slider and change its value so the thumb follows the mouse
<Slider SliderPosn:SliderHelperPackage.BindThumbToMouse="True" Margin="5" Height="25" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/adornedcontrol.aspx
this reference should give you all necessary information to fix your issue
cheers!
I have a requirement to focus on a specific textbox when a new view is loaded.
The solution was to add this line of code to the OnLoaded event for the view:
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => { NameTextBox.Focus(); });
So this worked for one view, but not another. I spent some time debugging the problem and realized that the new view I was working on had a BusyIndicator that takes focus away from all controls since the BusyIndicator being set to true and false was occuring after the OnLoaded event.
So the solution is to call focus to the NameTextBox after my BusyIndicator has been set to false. My idea was to create a reusable BusyIndicator control that handles this extra work. However, I am having trouble doing this in MVVM.
I started by making a simple extension of the toolkit:BusyIndicator:
public class EnhancedBusyIndicator : BusyIndicator
{
public UserControl ControlToFocusOn { get; set; }
private bool _remoteFocusIsEnabled = false;
public bool RemoteFocusIsEnabled
{
get
{
return _remoteFocusIsEnabled;
}
set
{
if (value == true)
EnableRemoteFocus();
}
}
private void EnableRemoteFocus()
{
if (ControlToFocusOn.IsNotNull())
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => { ControlToFocusOn.Focus(); });
else
throw new InvalidOperationException("ControlToFocusOn has not been set.");
}
I added the control to my XAML file with no problem:
<my:EnhancedBusyIndicator
ControlToFocusOn="{Binding ElementName=NameTextBox}"
RemoteFocusIsEnabled="{Binding IsRemoteFocusEnabled}"
IsBusy="{Binding IsDetailsBusyIndicatorActive}"
...
>
...
<my:myTextBox (this extends TextBox)
x:Name="NameTextBox"
...
/>
...
</my:EnhancedBusyIndicator>
So the idea is when IsRemoteFocusEnabled is set to true in my ViewModel (which I do after I've set IsBusy to false in the ViewModel), focus will be set to NameTextBox. And if it works, others could use the EnhancedBusyIndicator and just bind to a different control and enable the focus appropriately in their own ViewModels, assuming their views have an intial BusyIndicator active.
However, I get this exception when the view is loaded:
Set property 'foo.Controls.EnhancedBusyIndicator.ControlToFocusOn' threw an exception. [Line: 45 Position: 26]
Will this solution I am attempting work? If so, what is wrong with what I have thus far (cannot set the ControlToFocusOn property)?
Update 1
I installed Visual Studio 10 Tools for Silverlight 5 and got a better error message when navigating to the new view. Now I gete this error message:
"System.ArgumentException: Object of type System.Windows.Data.Binding cannot be converted to type System.Windows.Controls.UserControl"
Also, I think I need to change the DataContext for this control. In the code-behind constructor, DataContext is set to my ViewModel. I tried adding a DataContext property to the EnhancedBusyIndicator, but that did not work:
<my:EnhancedBusyIndicator
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"
ControlToFocusOn="{Binding ElementName=NameTextBox}"
RemoteFocusIsEnabled="{Binding IsRemoteFocusEnabled}"
IsBusy="{Binding IsDetailsBusyIndicatorActive}"
...
>
Update 2
I need to change UserControl to Control since I will be wanting to set focus to TextBox objects (which implement Control). However, this does not solve the issue.
#Matt, not sure
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"
will work in Silverlight 5, have you tried binding it as a static resource?
Without a BusyIndicator present in the view, the common solution to solve the focus problem is to add the code
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => { ControlToFocusOn.Focus(); });
to the Loaded event of the view. This actually works even with the BusyIndicator present; however, the BusyIndicator immediately takes focus away from the rest of the Silverlight controls. The solution is to invoke the Focus() method of the control after the BusyIndicator is not busy.
I was able to solve it by making a control like this:
public class EnhancedBusyIndicator : BusyIndicator
{
public EnhancedBusyIndicator()
{
Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler(EnhancedBusyIndicator_Loaded);
}
void EnhancedBusyIndicator_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
AllowedToFocus = true;
}
private readonly DependencyProperty AllowedToFocusProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("AllowedToFocus", typeof(bool), typeof(EnhancedBusyIndicator), new PropertyMetadata(true));
public bool AllowedToFocus
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(AllowedToFocusProperty); }
set { SetValue(AllowedToFocusProperty, value); }
}
public readonly DependencyProperty ControlToFocusOnProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("ControlToFocusOn", typeof(Control), typeof(EnhancedBusyIndicator), null);
public Control ControlToFocusOn
{
get { return (Control)GetValue(ControlToFocusOnProperty); }
set { SetValue(ControlToFocusOnProperty, value); }
}
protected override void OnIsBusyChanged(DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
base.OnIsBusyChanged(e);
if (AllowedToFocus && !IsBusy)
{
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => { ControlToFocusOn.Focus(); });
AllowedToFocus = false;
}
}
}
To use it, replace the BusyIndicator tags in your xaml with the new EnhancedBusyIndicator and add the appropriate namespace.
Add a new property, ControlToFocusOn inside the element, and bind it to an existing element in the view that you want focus to be on after the EnhancedBusyIndicator disappears:
<my:EnhancedBusyIndicator
ControlToFocusOn="{Binding ElementName=NameTextBox}"
...
>
...
</my:EnhancedBusyIndicator>
In this case, I focused to a textbox called NameTextBox.
That's it. This control will get focus every time we navigate to the page. While we are on the page, if the EnhancedBusyIndicator becomes busy and not busy agiain, focus will not go to the control; this only happens on initial load.
If you want to allow the EnhancedBusyIndicator to focus to the ControlToFocusOn another time, add another property, AllowedToFocus:
<my:EnhancedBusyIndicator
ControlToFocusOn="{Binding ElementName=NameTextBox}"
AllowedToFocus="{Binding IsAllowedToFocus}"
...
>
...
</my:EnhancedBusyIndicator>
When AllowedToFocus is set to true, the next time EnhancedBusyIndicator switches from busy to not busy, focus will go to ControlToFocusOn.
AllowedToFocus can also be set to false when loading the view, to prevent focus from going to a control. If you bind AllowedToFocus to a ViewModel property, you may need to change the BindingMode. By default, it is OneTime.
When should I be building Inlines in a TextBlock? I have a TextBlock-derived class that, when given text in a certain field, call it MyText, converts the text into a set of inlines when MyText has changed.
Whenever MyText changes, I clear the Inlines and build them, colorizing each word as needed. For this example, consider:
private void MyTextBlock_MyTextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Inlines.Clear();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.MyText))
{
var run = new Run();
run.Foreground = Brushes.DarkRed;
run.Text = this.MyText;
Inlines.Add(run);
}
}
This has worked very well. However, recently we placed the Control into a DataGrid, and some strange things have started happening. Apparently the DataGrid swaps out the context and for the most part this works. However, when we add or delete data from the DataGrid ItemsSource, something goes awry, and TextChanged doesn't seem like it is called (or at least not called at the same time). MyText can be one value, and the Inlines either blank or a different value.
I think that the place to build the Inlines is NOT during MyTextChanged, but maybe when the rendering of the Control starts. I've also tried when the DataContextChanged, but this does not help.
In my constructor, I have
this.myTextDescriptor = DependencyPropertyDescriptor.FromProperty(
MyTextProperty, typeof(MyTextBlock));
if (this.myTextDescriptor != null)
{
this.myTextDescriptor.AddValueChanged(this, this.MyTextBlock_MyTextChanged);
}
corresponding to a dependency property I have in the class
public string MyText
{
get { return (string)GetValue(MyTextProperty); }
set { SetValue(MyTextProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MyTextProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MyText", typeof(string), typeof(MyTextBlock));
private readonly DependencyPropertyDescriptor myTextDescriptor;
Update: If it is any kind of clue, the problem DataGrid cells seem to be the ones that are off-screen when the addition or removal happens. I also tried OnApplyTemplate, but that didn't help.
Update2: Perhaps a better solution might be to create bindable inlines?
DataGrids virtualize their content, so if a row is not visible it will not be loaded. That being the case, have you tried also rebuilding the inlines when the Loaded event fires?
I'm trying to achieve an effect where more items are appended to the list when the user scrolls down to the last item. I haven't found a way to determine if the user has scrolled to the end of the list. I don't see a event on ListBox that is fired when the user reaches the bottom of the list. Something that tells me when an item has been scrolled into view would be great, but as far as I can tell, there is nothing like that.
Is this even possible in WP7?
Edit: Another way of saying this is, can we detect when a list has "bounced"?
Daniel Vaughan has posted an example of how to detect for this at http://danielvaughan.orpius.com/post/Scroll-Based-Data-Loading-in-Windows-Phone-7.aspx
It isn't super easy to get going since there are a lot of moving parts, but here is what you can do, assuming you want a short list that loads more from your data as you get scrolling down, similar to a lot of twitter apps, etc.
Write your own subclass of ObservableCollection that only offers up a few items (like 20), keeping the rest held back until requested
Hook up to the scroll viewer (inside the listbox or container) and its visual state changed events, you can get the NotScrolling and Scrolling changes; for an example see this code by ptorr
When scrolling stops, use viewer scroll extensions code to see where things are extended (at the bottom or not) or just the raw scroll viewer properties to see if it is extended to the bottom
If so, trigger your observable collection to release another set of items.
Sorry I don't have a complete sample ready to blog yet. Good luck!
I've just implemented this for Overflow7.
The approach I took was similar to http://blog.slimcode.com/2010/09/11/detect-when-a-listbox-scrolls-to-its-end-wp7/
However, instead of using a Style I did the hook up in code.
Basically derived my parent UserControl from:
public class BaseExtendedListUserControl : UserControl
{
DependencyProperty ListVerticalOffsetProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"ListVerticalOffset",
typeof(double),
typeof(BaseExtendedListUserControl),
new PropertyMetadata(new PropertyChangedCallback(OnListVerticalOffsetChanged)));
private ScrollViewer _listScrollViewer;
protected void EnsureBoundToScrollViewer()
{
if (_listScrollViewer != null)
return;
var elements = VisualTreeHelper.FindElementsInHostCoordinates(new Rect(0,0,this.Width, this.Height), this);
_listScrollViewer = elements.Where(x => x is ScrollViewer).FirstOrDefault() as ScrollViewer;
if (_listScrollViewer == null)
return;
Binding binding = new Binding();
binding.Source = _listScrollViewer;
binding.Path = new PropertyPath("VerticalOffset");
binding.Mode = BindingMode.OneWay;
this.SetBinding(ListVerticalOffsetProperty, binding);
}
public double ListVerticalOffset
{
get { return (double)this.GetValue(ListVerticalOffsetProperty); }
set { this.SetValue(ListVerticalOffsetProperty, value); }
}
private static void OnListVerticalOffsetChanged(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
BaseExtendedListUserControl control = obj as BaseExtendedListUserControl;
control.OnListVerticalOffsetChanged();
}
private void OnListVerticalOffsetChanged()
{
OnListVerticalOffsetChanged(_listScrollViewer);
}
protected virtual void OnListVerticalOffsetChanged(ScrollViewer s)
{
// do nothing
}
}
this then meant that in the user control itself I could just use:
protected override void OnListVerticalOffsetChanged(ScrollViewer viewer)
{
// Trigger when at the end of the viewport
if (viewer.VerticalOffset >= viewer.ScrollableHeight)
{
if (MoreClick != null)
{
MoreClick(this, new RoutedEventArgs());
}
}
}
private void ListBox1_ManipulationCompleted(object sender, ManipulationCompletedEventArgs e)
{
EnsureBoundToScrollViewer();
}
The "hacky" thing here was that I had to use ListBox1_ManipulationCompleted and VisualTreeHelper to find my ScrollViewer - I'm sure there are better ways...
Have a look at this detect Listbox compression state from msdn blog
Use the DeferredLoadListBox.