Is there an easy way to do this?
I am testing my networking application using just the console for now. What would be nice is to have multiple consoles from one project and one press of the "Debug Now" menu item.
I could, like I have in the past, use multiple projects but that's seems unwieldy. Ideally I could launch multiple console instances (running from the same thread is fine) and have them not cover the other consoles when they do launch. Launching side by side would be awesome!
How practical is what I'm asking? Is it possible?
Thanks!
There is no easy way to do this.
Technically, you can create a separate console for an application, but it requires creating a child process to host the console. There is a CodeProject article showing the basic procedure.
That being said, at the point where you want multiple "windows" showing data, I think migrating to a (simple) GUI application is a better choice.
You could build & start a master application that runs and positions your test applications. See what the System.Diagnostics.Process class can do for you.
The real problem however is in debugging multiple instances of the same app at once. I'm not sure that that is possible.
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("MyOtherProgram.exe");
Related
I have a quite small (so far) project which consists of
Core
GUI
TUI
The TUI (console application) is communicating with another console application in order to send and retrieve certain information.
The purpose of the GUI is to make it easier.
However, I am stuck on how would I make my TUI communicate with my GUI. So far, I know I can start my TUI from the GUI like this:
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(#"cmd.exe", #"/k C:\project\TUI\bin\Debug\TUI.exe");
But now, I do not have any reference to the console application and I do not know to send information forth and back. I tried to search for the answer, but my search would only lead to how to start them in a normal way (not both, together, communicating).
So all in all, my question is: How to start a console application from windows forms project so those two to be able to communicate?
You can use the Input and Outut Streams of the Process.
Read this :
https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/system.diagnostics.process.standardinput(v=vs.110).aspx
I need to develop an application that will run on clients. The main focus is to let the application update another -specific- application and be able to monitor own defined states for clients. I'm considering something like a console application with TopShelf because it makes debug a lot easier. However... to install or update this specific application I must use a MSI. But if for example I create a process that executes msiexec the client/end user will be prompt with UAC. This is a big issue because clients should be updated unattended. And UAC must stay the way it is : highest level.
I've read a lot of questions/answer concerning UAC prompt... and to be honest I'm starting to doubt my own approach. I was not able to find any question that I could relate to.. so I would appreciate it if someone could give me some good advise, tips, references etc on a possible way to approach this issue.
Thanks in advance
Create a Task Scheduler job with the "Run with highest privileges" option checked.
You can easily create this job programatically, even using a XML configuration file.
This way the user is prompted to allow UAC only once (when first clicking an exe for example).
Okay I've spent the afternoon researching and haven't had much luck finding the answer to this. I am trying to prevent an application from launching via some sort of dll or background application. It is to be used in monitoring application usage and licenses at my institution. I have found leads here regarding WqlEventQuery and also FileSystemWatcher. Neither of these solutions appear to work for me because:
With WqlEventQuery I was only able to handle an event after the process was created. Using notepad as a test, notepad was visible and accessible to me before my logic closed it. I attempted to Suspend/Resume the thread (I know this is unsafe but I was testing/playing) but this just hung the window until my logic finished.
With FileSystemWatcher I was not able to get any events from launching a .exe, only creating, renaming and deleting files.
The goal here is to not let the application launch at all unless my logic allows it to launch. Is this possible? The next best solution I came up with was forcing some type of modal dialog which does not allow the user to interact with anything, once the dialog is closed the application is killed. My concern here is killing the application nicely and handling applications with high overhead when they load such as Photoshop or something. This would also interfere with a feature I was hoping to have where the user could enter a queue until a license is available. Is this my best route? Any other suggestions?
Thanks
edit: To clarify this is not a virus or anything malicious. It's not about preventing access to a blacklist or allowing access through a whitelist. The idea is to check a database on a case by case basis for certain applications and see if there is a license available for use. If there is, let the app launch, if not display a dialog letting the user know. We also will use this for monitoring and keeping track if we have enough licenses to meet demand, etc. An example of one of these apps is SPSS which have very expensive licenses but a very limited pool of people using it.
Could you use
System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcessesByName
in a loop to look for the process?
It might work if you don't use too aggressive a polling rate.
You are indeed close, take a look at the WMI Management Events. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186151%28VS.80%29.aspx
Sample code from Microsoft: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms257355(VS.80).aspx
Subscribing to the appropriate event will provide your application with the appropriate information to perform what you described.
Not sure if this is a GOOD solution but you could do something like pass a key into main so that if the key is not present or valid the application shuts down. Then when you open the application in your code, just pass the key in. Someone would then have to know the key in order to start the application.
This is assuming you have access to the application in question's source code, which upon reading your question again, I'm not so sure of.
I assume you don't have source for the application you want to prevent from loading...
Have you considered using a system policy? That would be the best-supported way to prevent a user from launching a program.
You could have a service running that force-kills any app that isn't "whitelisted", but I can't say how well that would work.
I wonder if you are taking the wrong approach. Back in the day there was a Mac app that would prevent access to the desktop and had buttons to launch a set list of applications.
IDEA
What if you had a wrapper for the approved apps then only allow your wrapper to run on the computer?
I would expect there is some way of hooking an application launch, but can't help directly on that front.
You may be able to improve your current approach by detecting the application's window opening and hiding it (move it offscreen) so that the user can't attempt to interact with it while you are trying to shut it down.
However, another approach that may be possible (depending on your circumstances) would be to write an application launcher. This simply is a replacement for the shortcut to the application that checks your licencing conditions, and then does a Process.Start to launch the real .exe at that point. This would work well for any application. (I used a system like this for starting up applications with specialised environment settings and it works beautifully)
You could combine this with your current approach as a fall-back for "clever" users who manage to circumvent your launcher.
If my understanding is right you want to create an application what will prevent the computer user to start any other process except ones for a white-list.
If this is the case, monitor the process list of processes (in a while loop) using System.Diagnostics.Process (the GetProcesses method gives the list of all running ones)
Just kill the process when it starts.
Or if your machines have Windows 7 (Windows 2008??) you can use AppLocker. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/enterprise/products/windows-7/features.aspx#applocker Just let Windows prevent the startup.
You might want to look at this product: http://www.sassafras.com/licensing.html Personally I can't stand it, but that's because it does what you describe. Might save you some coding.
You could actually edit the registry so when you click a psd, your launcher gets called instead of photoshop. Your launcher then checks for licenses and if there is one starts photoshop with the path of the file.
This is a long shot but you may find it helpful.
Perceived Types and Application Registration
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc144150(VS.85).aspx
What is the best and cleanest way to close a console application on windows mobile?
The application by default is invisible and you cannot see it in the running programs, which is great for running a background process, but sometimes the user might need to close it..
Exit Main. Seriously. If you need someone to be able to exit is manually, there needs to be some mechanism like a shell icon and menu or a program in the Programs folder of something. How else would the user even know it's running? Any one of those visual cues would then set a named system event, and inside your Console app you'd have something listening for the same event (likely a worker). When it gets set, you take the actions required to shut down.
How would a user be able to close it if the application is not visible in the UI?
That's a great question. I once spent a long time trying to figure this out. Of course, we are assuming you can not (easily) return from Main. The correct answer on the desktop is System.Environment.Exit; But that method is conveniently not supported on CF.
An apparent second option is Application.Exit. That is on CF, but only applies to WinForms, and is in fact not guaranteed to exit your application.
So, throw an unhandled exception. ;)
EDIT: To kill it programatically from another app, you can look at Process.GetProcessById, and Process.Kill. Both of these are available on CF. You will have to somehow let the "killer" app figure out the "victim"'s ID. More convenient methods like Process.GetProcessesByName are not available on CF.
This technique isn't that elegant, though, and there may be permissions issues.
You could also consider some kind of IPC (inter-process communication), perhaps one overviewed in this previous Windows Mobile answer.
I decided to to read a boolean (keep alive) in the config file and have another application set it to false when I want to exit.
Its not that responsive but at least I can exit cleanly..
I wrote a console program in c# that takes up to three files as input, and does some data calculations on them.
I'd like to make a simple frontend that allows the user to easily
import files - basically choose up to three files to be routed to the backend code
change settings - I have about 10 settings that I'm currently storing in an app.config file. maybe a simple settings box would be nice
see what's going on - the console program shows some status messages that might be useful to display on a GUI
I have practically no experience with windows forms or GUI design, so I really don't know where to begin. I compiled the backend stuff into a *.dll and am currently playing around in design mode of sharpdevelop...but i really have no idea how to get the two to work together.
any pointers would be greatly appreciated!
The usual pattern, in cases like these, is to make the main features of the application into a class library and call that from a wrapping executable, such as a console app, winforms app or webforms app (if possible). That way you can easily adapt the interface as needed and simply route input and output to and from the class library.
Edit: I realize this isn't a very indepth answer, but I hope it helps to get started at least, together with any other answer that may arrive.
If you want to get started with GUI design in .NET, I recommend you choose WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation). This is the latest technology released in the UI/graphics area by Microsoft and is where everything is heading now. (Windows Forms won't be obsolete for a long time, though it is surely but slowly becoming deprecated.) I noticed however that you are using SharpDevelop, which doesn't yet have real support for WPF (as far as I know), whereas it certainly does for WinForms. If there's any chance you can use Visual Studio, I recommend you begin by learning WPF. You have the advantage of not being confused by previous experience with the styles and methodologies of WinForms, so it would very much be the right way to go.
Whichever you wish to learn, the Getting Started page of WindowsClient.NET (the official MS site for both WinForms and WPF) would be a great resource. There's also a few MSDN articles on getting started with WPF.
Hope that helps.
Have you tried Visual Studio Express editions? They're free and come with a designer for either WinForms or WPF applications.
As a first pass you'll need 3 text areas for the filenames, with associated buttons to bring up the file open dialog (it doesn't actually open the file just returns the filename).
A label to display the status - updated from your worker code.
Then either the various radio buttons, check boxes etc for your configuration settings.
Oh and don't forget the "Start" button to set off your process.
If your process takes a while you ought to use a background worker thread. You can then implement a "Cancel" button to safely abort the process and tidy up if it goes wrong.
There will be optimisations and reorganisations that you can do once you've got it working.
Your question is quite indistinct. If you're asking about working with GUI, you should read some book on Windows Forms.
And if you're asking about how to put your dll in your new windows forms application, then you should just add a reference to it in winforms project's properties and then use classes from dll's namespace.