We Keep Coding

Might GC.Collect() be warranted in this particular case?

Disclaimer: Yes, I know that the general answer to whether or not to use GC.Collect() is a resounding "NO!". This is the first time in several years of programming that I ever consider using it at all.
Well then, here's the situation: We have developed a C# scripting tool based on the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting libraries (v3.6.0). It's a Winform GUI with editor etc., not unlike others out there. We use it for the validation of integrated circuits, meaning that its primary task is interfacing lab equipment such as power supplies, pattern generators, meters and the like. For the communication to said instruments we predominantly rely on National Instrument's VISA framework, albeit not exclusively. Some devices are controlled directly via DLLs from their respective manufacturers. In general, this system is working beautifully and by now it is successfully used by quite a lot of design engineers who do not know the first thing about the intricacies of .NET and C#.
At this point I should explain that the user can simply write a method (i.e. on "top-level") and then execute it. The Roslyn-part behind this is that the input is fed to CSharpScript.Create() and then compiled. The execution of a method is done via Script.ContinueWith("method name"). Inside of such a method the user can construct an object like, say, new VISA("connection string"), which connects to the device and then communicate with the device via this object. Nothing forces him or her to care about disposing the object (i.e. closing the connection).
Now, the problem is this: recently, very sporadic crashes of the GUI application have occurred with no feedback at all from the system - the form just closes and that's it. By trial-and-error we are currently 99% sure that if all connection objects are explicitely disposed within a method, the crashes do not occur. So, rewriting the method to something like this fixes the problem:
using(var device = new VISA("connection string"))
{
device.Query("IDN?");
}
The reason why I look into the GC's direction at all is that there is no discernible correlation to any actions from the user. The guys might run such methods for an hour without a problem and then, when scrolling in the editor, when no method is currently being executed, the GUI closes without comment. And that's why I'd like to get some input from people more knowledgeable about Roslyn and the GC:
Are there known issues with this scripting library and GC? (I would very much assume that there aren't)
Since the explicit disposal of objects seem to prevent the issue, might this be one of the extremely scarce situations where the use of GC.Collect() might be warranted? (admittedly, I could not yet test whether that also prevents the problem thanks to of home office)
Any ideas what can cause a .NET application to crash without any kind of feedback and how to obtain more information about such a crash? (the scripting engine is a separate DLL, as are the device drivers; the GUI only handles the graphics)
I am fully aware that this is a rather vague description of the problem with very little source code. This is due to the fact that the application comprises of quite a lot of source code and I have no idea what might be relevant here. Also, all namespaces in the above text refer to Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting, except for VISA, which is self-defined. Obviously, I will gladly answer any follow-up questions for getting to the bottom of this.
Thanks in advance.

Short answer: No. It's not only not warranted, it's completely missing the actual issue.
Further explanation: #canton7 instantly hit the nail on the head when writing
I'd argue that your application shouldn't crash even if a finalizer does end up being called
The root issue hid inside a 3rd party DLL in form of an, at the very least, suboptimal implementation of IDisposable. Once I zoomed in on that, it was rather easy to produce a workaround for that.
My original question is so very misguided that I'd like to state the one that I should have asked:
How do I trace a crash of my C# application when my application's logging does not show anything?
This question has been answered comprehensively in a number of posts. In my case, the crash could be seen in the Windows event log.

How do I Integrate one application’s UI into another?

I apologize for the length of the question, but I believe it is difficult to understand the “why” without the background.
Background: I have two applications running in a Windows Embedded Standard 7 environment. They should be the only two applications running on the machine. One, called “Controller”, is written in C++ the other, “DBconnector”, is written in c#. This is not new code. It has been in active use and development for almost 20 years.
The purpose of the software is to run a manufacturing machine for producing parts. These machines are big and dangerous if the program crashes. Long ago, I discovered that if the network went down for some reason, all the threads in the application would stall – not just the network thread. This was disastrous since leaving the controller in a state with the wrong relays on in extremely rare circumstances could cause the machine to literally explode. Note: Several things have been added to the software and hardware to prevent this now. While this danger doesn’t really exist anymore, stability is still extremely important. I never want the operator to be stuck in a state where they can’t hit the reset button. My solution at the time was to move the networking tasks into a separate application. The OS was windows XP based at the time. I have no idea if the problem still exists in windows 10 since I really don’t want to rewrite hundreds of thousands of lines of code to try and merge the two programs now.
The development of the two programs diverged such that the one that controlled the machine, Controller, was designed for extreme stability and the other, DBconnector, was where dangerous things like networking and most file I/O happened. Communication between the two programs is facilitated using a memory mapped file that they both can access. I have no problem sharing window handles or process id’s or any other data that might be needed between the two programs.
Here is my question. How can I make the Controller application display the GUI of DBconnector? For example, I have started to add functionality to Controller that requires DBconnector to display the quality control sheets that are held on a web site on company servers. I want for an operator to be able to pull up the quality control sheet directly on the machine. The operator currently only interacts with the Controller application. I don’t want Controller to be able to access the network. Also, C# has some tools to make displaying a web page easy. It seems to me that the place to do this is DBconnector. The problem is that DBconnector runs in the background and cannot currently be seen or accessed by a user. So, the question is how to solve this.
First option I have tried is to tell DBconnector to come forward and put Controller in the background. Then, when the user is done, Controller comes back to the front. I have made this to work using some hacks, but it is inconsistent. The trick I used was to minimize and then maximize DBconnector which seems to bring it to the front most of the time and try to hold focus on one or the other. There still might be a way to do it this way, but it needs to be something that is consistent.
The second option is to run the DBconnector application inside of one of Controller’s windows. I have no idea how to do this. I thought about using ATL or COM, but I think these run as threads within Controllers process rather than as a separate application.
The third option I’ve considered is to create a window inside Controller that intercepts and passes all user input messages directly to Dbconnector using a windows message handle and takes a screenshot of DBconnector whenever the it is invalidated and passes it through the memory mapped file. Currently, this is what I am swaying towards.
Are there any suggestions on how to do the first and last option better, or how to do the second option at all, or another solution that I have missed? Keep in mind that our current hardware is running Windows Embedded Standard 7. The project is currently in visual studio 2015. The C++ window technology is MFC implemented using libraries originally from around 2003 I think. DBconnector is in .NET framework 4 in C#.

How to decide between developing a web application and a desktop application [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am a software engineer intern for a manufacturing company and they want me to develop an application for the company. They are leaning towards a web application however, I wish to know whether a desktop application would better fit the job. Therefore, I have been googling and looking through stackoverflow to find out what the pros and cons between desktop applications and web applications are. The following is essentially what I found:
Quick disclaimer, I have background in C# and WPF so I am a bit biased as it would be easier for me to develop a desktop application. I have no web experience so there is nothing I can really talk about in that area which is why I wish to know more about whether this application is better suited as a web application or desktop application. I am absolutely open to learning Php and web development to expand my abilities. I have started (a bit) looking into developing the web application using Php7 with Laravel framework.
Pros of desktop applications:
Typically faster than Web Applications (Assuming web application will perform complex queries, calculations, etc, and not just display markups)
Development of GUIs is faster
More secure as desktop applications are private by default.
There are more available controls allowing for a more rich and interactive experience for user (Or at least, these controls are easier/faster to implement on desktop based applcations compared to a web-based application)
Can take advantage of user hardware.
Cons of desktop applications:
Use/deployment is limited by system (However, this should not be a problem because all our systems are Windows based.)
Updates and installation must be manually implemented.
If every client desktop gets a database connection, scaling is not
good as database suffers from heavy load. (However, this probably
will not be the case since we won't have more than 500 users).
Pros of web application
Cross platform (No need to deal with different operating systems) so it is easily portable
Development is quick and easy
Deployment is easy as updates are automatic and server side.
Large community support and available frameworks.
Cons of web application
Larger overhead (Applications tend to be slower due to need to transmit data across the internet).
Need to deal with different browsers. Javascript most likely needs to be tweaked to be perfect on one web platform (Chrome, Firefox, etc) and will not be perfect on the others. (However, this is not that big of a deal).
Security is an issue since data will be public.
Please let me know if any of the above is outdated (most of the posts I found were from 2011 or prior) or wrong. Also, if there is any other pro/con to consider.
Moving on to the application description....
Background on the company: We build and process dozens of different parts every day. For each type of part, after X amount of the part is processed, a sample needs to be taken for inspection. So for example, part Y has 3 samples taken every 120 minutes to be inspected (Because the machine typically finishes processing X amounts in 120 minutes). The inspection results (measurement data) are then stored in the database (MySQL database).
General summary of the application's purpose:
View the schematics of all the parts we design (We store all the schematics as pdfs on a network drive, so this is simply just pulling up the specific pdf requested from the drive and displaying it onto the application).
View/update the status of all the machines in the company (What parts are they working on, are they online/offline, etc). A certain user (Inspector) will use this application to update machine status/information. Then another user (Operator) will use the application to view the statuses.
Monitor part inspections. So, for every machine and part being processed, there will be a timer to let a Operator user know when a certain part needs to be submitted for inspection. Upon part submission, an inspector will then receive a notification to inspect the part, and after letting the application know that they completed the inspection, the timer will restart to let the operator know whens the next time they need to submit a part.
The application will calculate statistical data (For example, Cpk values) from the part measurements obtained from inspection results and display the statistical data along with a graph/chart.
I hope I explained all of this clearly enough. Some other things to note, from my understanding, the users will not need remote access. This application will pretty much only be used on company site. Also, the original reason that the company wanted a web application was because operators will be using a tablet for the application and the tablets they acquired were original android based. However, they decided to switch to using Windows Surface tablets so WPF applications are now a possibility.
With all of this being said, I am really looking for input on what route people with more experience would recommend. I am still in college so please forgive my lack of knowledge/experience. What else should I be thinking about when deciding between a web application and desktop application?
Here are some of the pages I have seen while pondering this topic:
Advantages of web applications over desktop applications
https://www.quora.com/How-much-different-is-it-to-build-a-web-application-vs-a-desktop-application
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-web-based-application-development-vs-desktop-application-development
There were more stackoverflow pages but the one listed above pretty much has everything that the other pages stated.
EDIT: Seems like web-application is winning so far (Not that I mind at all, I am actually excited to develop a web-application based off what I am hearing). Is there anyone who would rather do a desktop application? If so, why?

I'm inherently biased against web apps. They're difficult to get right due to browsers, they're typically insecure (by accident though). The platform sucks (JavaScript and the bazillion libraries from random people/orgs), "everything is a string". I could go on.
However it's undeniably the best platform for reaching a wide, public audience and allowing continual updates.
In a corporate environment the advantages do tend to go away, but not entirely. Updates, for example can be achieved generally by storing all your .exe & DLLs in a shared directory. As you say, you can build a much richer UI quicker and cheaper using the Windows platform.
With regards to your architecture, something that has worked for me in a similar situation is to have a Windows front end, but also have the guts of the business logic, data access (connection pooling) and processing off on a stateless web server (or two) accessed from the UI via Web Services (protocol of your choice - I prefer SOAP due to WCF and WSDL but plenty of folks won't).
This allows for centralised data access and a place to put your one-off batch jobs or calculations that can then be shared. It also has the advantage that if you need to do something really intensive, not every client machine has to have that capability.
Your situation seems to fit this model but without a lot of insider knowledge it's primarily opinion, but possibly one to consider.

Sounds like assembling or similar company work proccess monitoring to me.
If i have to build this application then first i will search and do some research if the function you want is possible and easy to develop with the programming language you will use
for example, if i choose to develop using web based then :
Larger overhead (Applications tend to be slower due to need to
transmit data across the internet).
you can use intranet and good spec server computer
Need to deal with different browsers. Javascript most likely needs to
be tweaked to be perfect on one web platform (Chrome, Firefox, etc)
and will not be perfect on the others. (However, this is not that big
of a deal).
then set the standard browser for working in your workplace
View the schematics of all the parts we design (We store all the
schematics as pdfs on a network drive, so this is simply just pulling
up the specific pdf requested from the drive and displaying it onto
the application).
you can upload pdf to server and view it within browser using pdf viewer plugin like pdfjs or similar plugin
View/update the status of all the machines in the company (What parts
are they working on, are they online/offline, etc). A certain user
(Inspector) will use this application to update machine
status/information. Then another user (Operator) will use the
application to view the statuses
is the machine have ip ?
can i use ping function to the machine to determine the machine is online or not to ease the task ?
if not then what is the schedule of the inspector to inspect the machine ?
of course the inspector can login to the system then update the machine status manually using web application
Monitor part inspections. So, for every machine and part being
processed, there will be a timer to let a Operator user know when a
certain part needs to be submitted for inspection. Upon part
submission, an inspector will then receive a notification to inspect
the part, and after letting the application know that they completed
the inspection, the timer will restart to let the operator know whens
the next time they need to submit a part.
this one sounds like scheduling mechanics to ensure the quality, you can make a timer with jquery and using ajax to send notification to the operator with specific data about certain part that need to be inspected
The application will calculate statistical data (For example, Cpk
values) from the part measurements obtained from inspection results
and display the statistical data along with a graph/chart.
this one is depends on your statistic formula, you can use highchart plugin for this one
the second one after you ensure your choosen programming language able to accomplish the task you want is to design the database structure
Quote by Linus Torvalds :
"Bad programmers worry about the code. Good programmers worry about data structures and their relationships."
Have a nice day, good luck with deciding after give it some good thinking to avoid development problem in the future

Certain applications stopping all attempts at getting keystrokes

So for work they have me writing a simple program for tracking employee efficiency within their workflow (things like using keyboard shortcuts, window locations, how often they need to look stuff up). Currently we want to track the 'F5' key (brings up next work item), 'Alt+Tab' (changes windows), 'Ctrl+V' (paste), but may be expanded as they find there are more shortcuts or things they want to track.
Note We are on windows 7, and using c# to write the tracking program.
In order to do this I wrote a low-level hooking library to capture the chosen keystrokes, send off the message down the hook chain and then add a note to a db that the key was used. The hooking library works great in All web browsers and most normal programs (except we don't actually care about browsers so we ignore everything done in them).
The issue is that the application that they use for managing their work (the program we actually care about tracking) some how stops our hooks from hooking and I do not know how. The application in question is TA2000 Desktop.
I know that with the way hooks work if an application fails to call callnexthook() within the LowLevelHooksTimeout period that the system kills the hook. So figuring maybe TA2000 was just taking to long or something I bumped up the timeout to 30 seconds (yes I know this is significantly more time than a hook should even need) but this had no effect.
The next thing I tried was implementing a tracking system based on the Raw Input API. And once again the tracking tracks on browsers, Microsoft office, notepad, and all the other programs I opened except it still is unable to track key press in TA2000. This really surprised me because according to MSDN
An application does not have to detect or open the input device.
An application gets the data directly from the device, and processes the data for its needs
An application can distinguish the source of the input even if it is from the same type of device. For example, two mouse devices.
So if I am getting the data directly from the device how is TA2000 preventing me from also getting the key press?
The last thing I could think of trying was using dll injection on TA2000 to inject a hook. However this method seems risky because It is something neither I nor any other developer here has any experience with and the application we want to track is operation critical so messing it up can not happen and injecting code into its memory space seems like a good way to mess things up.
If someone could explain how TA2000 could be stopping me from tracking keystrokes and how to beat it or point me in a good direction I would be very appreciative.
p.s. This felt questionable as an appropriate question for the SO format but it also feels specific enough to be a viable question. So sorry if this is not a good question but I am at my wits end with this.

This financial software package is secured to prevent snooping. Running the key logging software as Administrator appears to fix this specific problem. The security was identified initially using Sysinternals' Process Explorer, which is a great starting point for unexpected problems like this.

How is application virtualization implemented?

I am trying to understand how software like App-V and sandboxie (http://www.sandboxie.com/) work. But for the life of me, I can't think of anything that could make this possible. How do they intercept API calls and trick the target software? If someone would say that it's just magic and pixie dust, I would believe them. Seriously though, are there any white papers that discuss solutions to this problem?
If this is possible on the CLR level then that would be good but I'm willing to go native if I have to.

Sandboxie does it by essentially injecting code into core Windows API, the same way a virus would (which is why Vista x64 prevents this behaviour, and why Sandboxie doesn't work on that OS).
Here is a project explaining API hooking. I learned how all this work by studying the sourcecode for Metamod:Source (used for SourceMod for CounterStrike:Source :) )

I don't know how MS did it, but here is the basic theory of one way to do it ...
What you want to do is hook into the system calls (similar to chaining into interrupt).
System call occurs.
Your custom intercept gets executed.
If this syscall does not need special processing, continue on. Otherwise it needs special processing and go to step 4.
Get the stack pointer, instruction pointer and all that jazz from the stack, and build a new stack frame to send you back to your custom code in user-land.
Do your massaging of data and paths and stuff in user land. This way if the underlying OS changes, this code does not have to be updated [as frequently].
After all the data massaging, execute the system call again.
Your custom interrupt executes again, but it should detect that you are calling from your user-land helper layer and pass the call on through. Some stack frame manipulation may be required to set up proper return addresses.
Regular system call executes.
When the system call returns, the stack frame should should send you back to your regular program flow.
Hope this helps.

Check out the Wikipedia page on X86 Virtualization which discusses both software virtualization (early VMWare, Wine, Sandboxie and to an extent App-V) and the more modern hardware virtualization (Hyper-V, VMWare, others).
I'm assuming you're looking specifically for software virtualization as by using .NET (or any CLR) you're already abstracting yourself away from the CPU architecture to an extent, especially with the 'AnyCPU' target.