I have an SQL statement that I'm executing through OleDb, the statement is something like this:
INSERT INTO mytable (name, dept) VALUES (#name, #dept);
I'm adding parameters to the OleDbCommand like this:
OleDbCommand Command = new OleDbCommand();
Command.Connection = Connection;
OleDbParameter Parameter1 = new OleDbParameter();
Parameter1.OleDbType = OleDbType.VarChar;
Parameter1.ParamterName = "#name";
Parameter1.Value = "Bob";
OleDbParameter Parameter2 = new OleDbParameter();
Parameter2.OleDbType = OleDbType.VarChar;
Parameter2.ParamterName = "#dept";
Parameter2.Value = "ADept";
Command.Parameters.Add(Parameter1);
Command.Parameters.Add(Parameter2);
The problem I've got is, if I add the parameters to command the other way round, then the columns are populated with the wrong values (i.e. name is in the dept column and vice versa)
Command.Parameters.Add(Parameter2);
Command.Parameters.Add(Parameter1);
My question is, what is the point of the parameter names if parameters values are just inserted into the table in the order they are added command? The parameter names seems redundant?
The Problem is that OleDb (and Odbc too) does not support named parameters.
It only supports what's called positional parameters.
In other words: The name you give a parameter when adding it to the commands parameters list does not matter. It's only used internally by the OleDbCommand class so it can distinguish and reference the parameters.
What matters is the order in which you add the parameters to the list. It must be the same order as the parameters are referenced in the SQL statement via the question mark character (?).
But here is a solution that allows you to use named parameters in the SQL statement. It basically replaces all parameter references in the SQL statement with question marks and reorders the parameters list accordingly.
It works the same way for the OdbcCommand class, you just need to replace "OleDb" with "Odbc" in the code.
Use the code like this:
command.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM Contact WHERE FirstName = #FirstName";
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("#FirstName", "Mike");
command.ConvertNamedParametersToPositionalParameters();
And here is the code
public static class OleDbCommandExtensions
{
public static void ConvertNamedParametersToPositionalParameters(this OleDbCommand command)
{
//1. Find all occurrences of parameter references in the SQL statement (such as #MyParameter).
//2. Find the corresponding parameter in the commands parameters list.
//3. Add the found parameter to the newParameters list and replace the parameter reference in the SQL with a question mark (?).
//4. Replace the commands parameters list with the newParameters list.
var newParameters = new List<OleDbParameter>();
command.CommandText = Regex.Replace(command.CommandText, "(#\\w*)", match =>
{
var parameter = command.Parameters.OfType<OleDbParameter>().FirstOrDefault(a => a.ParameterName == match.Groups[1].Value);
if (parameter != null)
{
var parameterIndex = newParameters.Count;
var newParameter = command.CreateParameter();
newParameter.OleDbType = parameter.OleDbType;
newParameter.ParameterName = "#parameter" + parameterIndex.ToString();
newParameter.Value = parameter.Value;
newParameters.Add(newParameter);
}
return "?";
});
command.Parameters.Clear();
command.Parameters.AddRange(newParameters.ToArray());
}
}
Parameter NAMES are generic in the SQL support system (i.e. not OleDb specific). Pretty much ONLY OleDb / Odbc do NOT use them. They are there because OleDb is a specific implementation of the generic base classes.
Related
Is it possible to parse sql parameters from plain commandtext?
e.g.
//cmdtext = SELECT * FROM AdWorks.Countries WHERE id = #id
SqlCommand sqlc = new SqlCommand(cmdtext);
SqlParameterCollection parCol = sqlc.Parameters //should contain now 1 paramter called '#id'
If a SQL Server is available, the best option may be to simply ask the server what it thinks; the server has parsing and metadata functions built in, for example sp_describe_undeclared_parameters.
I ended up with this extention method (since I don't think there's a built in function):
public static class SqlParExtension
{
public static void ParseParameters(this SqlCommand cmd)
{
var rxPattern = #"(?<=\= |\=)#\w*";
foreach (System.Text.RegularExpressions.Match item in System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Matches(cmd.CommandText, rxPattern))
{
var sqlp = new SqlParameter(item.Value, null);
cmd.Parameters.Add(sqlp);
}
}
}
usage:
//cmdtext = SELECT * FROM AdWorks.Countries WHERE id = #id
SqlCommand sqlc = new SqlCommand(cmdtext);
sqlc.ParseParameters();
sqlc.Parameters["#id"].Value = value;
I will have to make sure about this but I'm sure you must add the range of parameters to the command. Like I say I will have to come back with this but you can try doing something like:
// Create a collection of parameters with the values that the procedure is expecting in your SQL client.
SqlParameter[] parameters = { new SqlParameter("#id", qid),
new SqlParameter("#otherValue", value) };
// Add teh parameters to the command.
sqlc.Parameters.AddRange(parameters)
You would be very welcome to have a look at my VS2015 extension, QueryFirst, that generates wrapper classes from .sql files, harvesting parameter declarations directly from your sql. You need to declare your parameters in the --designTime section of your request, but then you find them again directly as inputs to the Execute(), GetOne() or ExecuteScalar() methods. These methods return POCOs with meaningul property names. There's intellisense everywhere, and you don't have to type a line of parameter code, or connection code, or command code, or reader code, among NUMEROUS OTHER ADVANTAGES :-).
I've heard of parametized sql queries a long time ago but I never really gave any attention to it as I'm used to writing full sql statements. I know it improves security against sql injection so now might be a very good time to adapt change even if it's too late. I got this one from this site http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2005/04/give-me-parameterized-sql-or-give-me-death.html. So all credits go to the author. I've noticed all examples of parametized sql queries have paremeter count limitations. An example is the one shown below.
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(_connectionString);
conn.Open();
string s = "SELECT email, passwd, login_id, full_name FROM members WHERE email = #email";
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(s);
cmd.Parameters.Add("#email", email);
SqlDataReader reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
This is just equivalent to
SELECT email, passwd, login_id, full_name FROM members WHERE email = 'x';
I've learned programming all on my own through reading online tutorials and I really got nobody to help me on this. The reason I got stuck with full sql statement queries is the fact that I can't figure out how to do parametized sql queries with unlimited parameters. Is there any way to do this? The example only accepts 1 parameter which is the 'email' field. And it selects 4 fields from the given sql statement. My question is... is there any way we can do parametized sql queries with 5, 6, 7, or 100 selected fields, as well as the conditions under the WHERE clause? If this is possible, it will be particularly helpful when using INSERT statement. Thank you very much.
This example is in C#, but any VB.NET or same C# implementations are greatly appreciated. Thanks.
One possible solution would be to pass the parameters name and value using a Dictionary object. A Dictionary object holds a collection of keys and values, and this is exactly what a single SqlParameter is - a single Key/Value container in the form:
Key = #Value
A collection can hold an arbitrary count of items, for example:
new Dictionary<String, Object>
{
{ "#Name", "Anonymous" },
{ "#Age", 25 },
{ "#Street", "Highway" },
{ "#Number", "1001" },
{ "#City", "NoName" }
}
In the example above, the key is of type String and the value of type Object. Object allows parameter values of arbitrary types (the explanation comes later in the code examples).
One possibility to create dynamic SQL statements would be:
extract the repetitive tasks, for example the creation of the SqlCommand and the passing of the parameters to the SqlCommand variable
create parametrised dynamic SQL query string for the wanted SQL command
The code can look like this:
// extract all repetitive tasks
// Create an array of SqlParameters from the given Dictionary object.
// The parameter value is of type Object in order to allow parameter values of arbitrary types!
// The .NET Framework converts the value automatically to the correct DB type.
// MSDN info: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0881fz2y%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
private SqlParameter[] dictionaryToSqlParameterArray(Dictionary<string, object> parameters)
{
var sqlParameterCollection = new List<SqlParameter>();
foreach (var parameter in parameters)
{
sqlParameterCollection.Add(new SqlParameter(parameter.Key, parameter.Value));
}
return sqlParameterCollection.ToArray();
}
// sqlQuery is the complete parametrised query
// for example like: INSERT INTO People(Name, Age, Street) VALUES(#Name, #Age, #Street)
private SqlCommand createSqlCommand(String sqlQuery, Dictionary<String, object> parameters)
{
SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(sqlQuery);
command.Parameters.AddRange(dictionaryToSqlParameterArray(parameters));
return command;
}
Now a call with dynamic count of parameters will look like this:
SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString);
connection.Open();
string sqlQuery = "SELECT email, passwd, login_id, full_name FROM members WHERE email = #email AND name = #name";
// using the newly created method instead of adding/writing every single parameter manually
SqlCommand command = createSqlCommand(sqlQuery, new Dictionary<String, Object>
{
{ "#email", "test#test.com" },
{ "#name", "test" }
});
SqlDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader();
It is a good start, but this is still not very dynamic, since we need to write the complete query every time (we save only the typing of command.Parameters.Add). Let's change this in order to type even less:
// create a parametrised SQL insert command with arbitrary count of parameters for the given table
private SqlCommand createSqlInsert(String tableName, Dictionary<String, object> parameters)
{
// the sql insert command pattern
var insertQuery = #"INSERT INTO {0}({1}) VALUES({2})";
// comma separated column names like: Column1, Column2, Column3, etc.
var columnNames = parameters.Select (p => p.Key.Substring(1)).Aggregate ((h, t) => String.Format("{0}, {1}", h, t));
// comma separated parameter names like: #Parameter1, #Parameter2, etc.
var parameterNames = parameters.Select (p => p.Key).Aggregate ((h, t) => String.Format("{0}, {1}", h, t));
// build the complete query
var sqlQuery = String.Format(insertQuery, tableName, columnNames, parameterNames);
// debug
Console.WriteLine(sqlQuery);
// return the new dynamic query
return createSqlCommand(sqlQuery, parameters);
}
// create a parametrised SQL select/where command with arbitrary count of parameters for the given table
private SqlCommand createSqlWhere(String tableName, Dictionary<String, object> parameters)
{
// the sql select command pattern
var whereQuery = #"SELECT * FROM {0} WHERE {1}";
// sql where condition like: Column1 = #Parameter1 AND Column2 = #Parameter2 etc.
var whereCondition = parameters.Select (p => String.Format("{0} = {1}", p.Key.Substring(1), p.Key)).Aggregate ((h, t) => String.Format("{0} AND {1}", h, t));
// build the complete condition
var sqlQuery = String.Format(whereQuery, tableName, whereCondition);
// debug
Console.WriteLine(sqlQuery);
// return the new dynamic query
return createSqlCommand(sqlQuery, parameters);
}
Now the creation of a SELECT command will look like this:
SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString);
connection.Open();
// specify only table name and arbitrary count of parameters
var getPersonSqlCommand = createSqlWhere("People", new Dictionary<String, Object>
{
{ "#Name", "J.D." },
{ "#Age", 30 }
});
SqlDataReader reader = getPersonSqlCommand.ExecuteReader();
The createSqlWhere method will return an initialized SqlCommand with the query:
SELECT * FROM People WHERE Name = #Name AND Age = #Age
The INSERT will also be short:
SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString);
connection.Open();
// specify only table name and arbitrary count of parameters
var addPersonSqlCommand = createSqlInsert("People", new Dictionary<String, Object>
{
{ "#Name", "Anonymous" },
{ "#Age", 25 },
{ "#Street", "Test" }
});
addPersonSqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
The corresponding SQL command will look like this:
INSERT INTO People(Name, Age, Street) VALUES(#Name, #Age, #Street)
Other SQL commands like DELETE, UPDATE and so on can be created in the same way. New parameters should be added only in one place - in the dictionary.
Admittedly the initial effort is more than just writing one method, but it will pay off if the new methods are used more than once (a couple of times) - for example five parametrised selects and/or inserts on five different tables with different parameters, which is certainly always the case in small and average sized software projects.
Just create a method like :
public void unlimQuery(string query,params object[] args)
{
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(_connectionString);
conn.Open();
string s =query;
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(s);
For(int i=0;i< args.Length;i++)
cmd.Parameters.Add("#param"+i, args[i]);
SqlDataReader reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
}
Example :
unlimQuery("INSERT INTO CUSTOMERS(ID,NAME,AGE,ADRESS,COUNTRY) VALUES(#param0,#param1,#param2,#param3,#param4)",5,"Ali",27,"my City","England");
Explanation :
the params keyword in c# gives you the possibility to insert unlimited arguments of the indicated type, so the arguments added (5,"Ali",27,"my City","England") will be casted to an array of objects then passed to the Method
inside the method you'll get an array of objects, so for each object you create a parameter, his alias is #paramX where X is the index of the argument (in the params array), then sqlCommad will replace each alias by its value defined in the cmd.Parameters.Add("#param"+i, args[i]) clause
so #param0 => 5, .....
i think you just have to change this
cmd.Parameters.Add("#email", email);
to
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#email", email);
I am making the switch from classic ASP to ASP.NET. And I am having some trouble doing some basic stuff that I used to do easily with the old method. Below is a handy ASP function that I used to execute scalar queries with a few lines.
FUNCTION ExecuteScalarParams(SQLQuery, Parameter_Array)
Set cmd1 = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Command")
cmd1.ActiveConnection = con
cmd1.CommandText = SQLQuery
cmd1.CommandType = 1
FOR ParamCount = 0 TO UBOUND(Parameter_Array)
cmd1.Parameters(ParamCount) = Parameter_Array(ParamCount)
NEXT 'ParamCount
Set rstScalar = cmd1.Execute()
IF NOT rstScalar.EOF THEN
arrScalar = rstScalar.GetRows()
IF UBOUND(arrScalar,2) = 0 THEN
ExecuteScalarParams = arrScalar(0,0)
ELSE
ExecuteScalarParams = NULL
END IF
ELSE
ExecuteScalarParams = NULL
END IF
rstScalar.Close
Set rstScalar = Nothing
Set cmd1 = Nothing
END FUNCTION
I used to pass a SQL query with question marks as place holders for the parameters like this:
SELECT TOP 1 UserName FROM Members WHERE (Created>?) AND (AdminLevel=?);
I would then set up a parameters array and pass it on to the function:
MyArray = ARRAY("1-JAN-2012",1)
The parameters in the array would replace the question marks in the query string in the order they appear.
I am trying to mimic this function in C# but I am stuck in the part where I have to pass the parameters. So far I got to the point where I have to used named place holders such as #Created and #AdminLevel instead of the question marks and then I have to set up parameter objects like this:
SqlParameter param = new SqlParameter();
param.ParameterName = "#AdminLevel";
param.Value = 1;
Is there a way to pass the parameters without having to set the parameter names and simply use question marks and the order in which they appear to specify which parameter goes where?
edit: as pointed out by Dana the MSDN Docs for Parameters shows you need to use named parameters for SqlClient but can use positional parameters for OleDb/ODBC.
You can make adding parameters a lot easier by using the code below; it's the skeleton I use but I'm sure there's a better way of doing it.
You still need to used named parameters, but you can simulate your question marks to an extent by naming them #a, #b, #c.. - positional parameters are fine until you get more than a handful of parameters and you have to constantly count the number of question marks to figure out which parameter value is being applied where, often resulting in mistakes.
using (var con = new SqlConnection(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ConnectionString"].ConnectionString))
{
con.Open();
{
using (var command = con.CreateCommand())
{
command.Connection = conn;
command.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Table] WHERE [c1] = #a AND [c2] = #b";
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("#a", aVal);
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("#b", bVal);
command.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
using (var reader = command.ExecuteReader())
{
if (reader.HasRows)
{
while (reader.Read())
{
///
}
}
else
{
///
}
}
}
}
}
well, the question is clear i hope, the code is this:
string sql = "delete from #tabelnaam";
SqlCommand sc = new SqlCommand();
sc.Connection = getConnection();
sc.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
sc.CommandText = sql;
SqlParameter param = new SqlParameter();
param.Direction = ParameterDirection.Input;
param.ParameterName = "#tabelnaam";
param.Value = tableName;
sc.Parameters.Add(param);
OpenConnection(sc);
sc.ExecuteScalar();
tableName is supplied to this function.
I get the exception:
Must declare the table variable #tabelnaam
IIRC, you cant use a substitute the table name for a parameter.
Rather build the SQL string containing the correct table name.
Make to changes
rather than using paramter use this
string sql = string.format( "delete from {0}",tableName);
make use of executenonquery intead of ExecuteScalar
sc.ExecuteNonQuery();
As mentioned by others, you can't parameterise the table name.
However, as you rightly mention in comments on other answers, using simple string manipulation potentialy introduces a SQL injection risk:
If your table name input is fro an untrusted source, such as user input, then using this:
string sql = string.format( "DELETE FROM {0}",tableName);
leaves you open to the table name "myTable; DROP DATABASE MyDb" being inserted, to give you:
DELETE FROM myDb; DROP DATABASE MyDB
The way round this is to delimit the table name doing something such as this:
string sql = string.format("DELETE FROM dbo.[{0}]", tableName);
in combination with checking that the input does not contain either '[' or ']'; you should probably check it also doesn't contain any other characters that can't be used as a table name, such as period and quotes.
I dont think you can parameterize the table name. From what I have read you can do it via Dynamic sql and calling sp_ExecuteSQL.
Your SQL is incorrect, you are deleting from a table variable yet you haven't defined that variable.
Update: as someone has pointed out, you are trying to dynamically build a query string but have inadvertantly used SQL parameters (these do not act as place holders for string literals).
More here:
Parameterise table name in .NET/SQL?
You cannot parameterise the table name, you have to inject it into the command text.
What you can and should do is protect yourself against SQL injection by delimiting the name thus:
public static string Delimit(string name) {
return "[" + name.Replace("]", "]]") + "]";
}
// Construct the command...
sc.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
sc.CommandText = "delete from " + Delimit(tableName);
sc.ExecuteNonQuery();
See here and here for more background info.
Since the OleDbParameter does not use named parameters (due to its nature),
why is it that the .NET OleDbParameter class expects a name? (string parametername ...)
All constructors require a parameter name, and I'm never sure what name to give it; my name is ok? or my grandmothers name?
Although the OleDb/Odbc providers use positional parameters instead of named parameters -
the parameters will need to be identified in some way inside the OleDbParameter collection should you need to reference them.
importantly when the parameterised sql statement is constructed, a variable for each parameter is declared and assigned it's respective value. and then used in the sql statement that is executed.
Take for example:
string sql = "SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Field = ?";
OleDbCommand cmd = new OleDbCommmand(sql, sqlConnection);
cmd.Parameters.Add("#FieldValue", OleDbType.Int32, 42);
OleDbDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader();
The SQL executed would be something like (or close to I think):
DECLARE #FieldValue INT;
SET #FieldValue = 42;
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Field = #FieldValue
You would be advised to use a parameter name that best matches the name of the column being operated on.
Just like everything else in programming, name it something meaningful to your context! (name, orderid, city, etc).
You use the names to access the parameters collection by name while in your c# code:
OleDbCommand command = new OleDbCommand();
...//Add your parameters with names, then reference them later if you need to:
command.Parameters["name"].Value = "your name or your grandmothers name here";
This is also useful when you use OUT parameters to extract the value after you execute your statement:
OleDbParameter outParam = new OleDbParameter();
outParam.Direction = ParameterDirection.Output;
outParam.DbType = DbType.Date;
outParam.ParameterName = "outParam";
command.Parameters.Add(outParam);
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
DateTime outParam = Convert.ToDateTime(command.Parameters["outParam"].Value);
There are interfaces and factories to provide a degree of independence of the underlying provider for data access - IDataParameter, DbParameter, DbProviderFactory etc.
To support this, all parameters can be named, even when the name is not used by the underlying provider.