I have multiple controllers with different actions (no "Index" actions). The actions I consider "default" actions, are named differently. I want to create default routes for their names and have the first available action (from my list of default actions) executed if only the controller name is provided in the route.
So, for example, I have the following actions which I want to consider default and want checked for their existence in a controller in this order:
List()
Draw()
ViewSingle()
The routing should somehow search for /{controller} and then take the first available action from the list above as default action, e.g.:
/ControllerA -> ControllerA.List()
/ControllerB -> ControllerB.Draw()
/ControllerC -> ControllerC.ViewSingle()
/ControllerD -> ControllerD.Draw()
/ControllerE -> ControllerE.List()
Is this possible? I tried creating additional Default actions like this but couldn't get it to work:
routes.MapRoute("Default1", "{controller}/{action}",
new { controller = UrlParameter.Optional, action = "List" }
routes.MapRoute("Default2", "{controller}/{action}",
new { controller = UrlParameter.Optional, action = "Draw" }
routes.MapRoute("Default3", "{controller}/{action}",
new { controller = UrlParameter.Optional, action = "ViewSingle" }
Help?
I think you got something wrong about the default route. Those controller and action parameters are there for convention. If URL has a controller name in it, it will route to suitable controller. Same thing is true for Index methods. It just provides a default value for that.They are already optional and that's why. I think you don't need routes here: You could try to place your default functions in Index methods and it would work.Just to be clear:
public class ControllerA:Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return List();
}
public ActionResult List()
{
//List function
}
}
public class ControllerB:Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return Draw();
}
public ActionResult Draw()
{
//Draw function
}
}
I think it would work. But if you want to go on with creating routes, you create each route like this:
routes.MapRoute("Default1", "ControllerA",
new { controller = ControllerA, action = "List" }
Notice that ControllerA is not in curly braces,it's a static text. So you create routes for each controller. Keep controller naming convention in mind.
I agree with Narsil. You should write a constant to url. -like controller name- 'cause MVC cannot resolve this routes and cannot figure out what you want to show.
eg.
routes.MapRoute(null, "ControllerA/{action}",
new { controller = "ControllerA", action = "List" }
routes.MapRoute(null, "ControllerB/{action}",
new { controller = "ControllerB", action = "Draw" }
routes.MapRoute(null, "ControllerC/{action}",
new { controller = "ControllerC", action = "ViewSingle" }
Related
I need to define template based routing to controller and then attribute based for actions in ASP.NET Core. Something like:
public class Foo : Controller
{
[HttpGet]
public object Get()
{
return new
{
ID = "A"
};
}
[HttpPost]
public object Create([FromBody]dynamic entity)
{
return new
{
ID = "B"
};
}
}
Route
app.UseMvc(routes =>
{
routes.MapRoute("Settings", "settings/api/foo",
new { controller = "Foo" }
);
});
And I expect this to work:
GET /settings/api/foo
POST /settings/api/foo
Unfortunately it is not a case. It looks like route attributes are ignored. What is the best way to achieve requirement?
The trick here is to route the URL to a specific controller and action. Then use action method overloading with an action method selector to switch between the GET and POST.
Change your route setup code to this:
app.UseMvc(routes =>
{
routes.MapRoute(
"Settings",
"settings/api/foo",
new {
controller = "Foo", // specific controller
action = "DoThing", // AND specific action
}
);
});
And change the controller to have both action methods (or however many you want - one for each HTTP verb) to have the same name, but using different action methods selectors:
public class FooController : Controller
{
[HttpGet] // different action method selector!
public object DoThing() // same name!
{
return new
{
ID = "A"
};
}
[HttpPost] // different action method selector!
public object DoThing([FromBody]dynamic entity) // same name!
{
return new
{
ID = "B"
};
}
}
This way MVC will route all the requests for that URL to an action called DoThing on controller Foo. Once it gets there it sees "oh my, oh my, there are two actions with the same name!" But then it sees the [HttpGet] and [HttpPost] action method selectors, and whichever one of them says it can handle the request will win.
I need my page names to have a dash in the name. E.G our-vision
I'm new to MVC & c# so I may be going about all this wrong.
Here is my controller:
public class HomeController : Controller
{
//
// GET: /Home/
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
//
// GET: /our-vision/
public ActionResult ourVision()
{
return View();
}
}
And then in my views, I have Views/Home/ourVision.cshtml.
When I compile and go to http://localhost/ourVision it works, but when I go to http://localhost/our-vision it does not.
Here is my routing:
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
You'll need to do a few things in order to achieve that.
First, to achieve our-Vision, you'll need to give your action method the ActionName attribute, like so:
[ActionName("our-Vision")]
public ActionResult ourVision()
Next, you'll have to rename your ourVision.cshtml view to be our-Vision.cshtml
Finally, whenever you're using Url.Action or ActionLink, you need to use our-Vision and not vision, like so:
Url.Action("our-Vision", "Home");
IMHO
The best way to do this - is define new route in route engine:
routes.MapRoute(
"OurVision", // Route name
"our-vision", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "ourVision" } // Parameter defaults
);
I know you can pass in parameters via urls like .com/MyPage/?controlID=5 but how can you do it with something like .com/MyPage/5? Thus not requiring the variable name or a question mark.
You would define a custom route, or use the model binding to get the intended effect. In your case, the route would be something like:
routes.Add("someRoute",
"{controller}/{action}/{controlId}",
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", controlId = UrlParameter.Optional }
);
public ActionResult Index(int? controlId)
{
}
Now, the only "gotcha" with this route is that if you also have the default route specified, these two routes will be in contention and the first one you have defined will win. If there is some form of differentiating value (say, that controlId always matches some kind of pattern), then you can always add a HttpRouteConstraint to the route to differentiate your new route from the default route.
Alternatively, you can rename the parameter on your action method, if you are still using the default route, to be id, and change your query string key to 'id':
public ActionResult Index(int? id)
{
// Do Stuff
}
Create a method in MyPageController:
public ActionResult Index (int id)
{
}
That will work with the default routes
I have created a controller called loginController.cs and i have created a view called login.aspx
How do I call that view from loginController.cs?
The ActionResult is always set to index and for neatness, I want to specify what view the controller uses when called rather than it always calling its default index?
Hope that makes sense.
You can customize pretty much everything in MVC routing - there is no particular restriction on how routes look like (only ordering is important), you can name actions differently from method names (via ActionName attribute), your can name views whatever you want (i.e. by returning particular view by name).
return View("login");
In the interest of actually answering the question.. you can add a route ABOVE your default route in Global.asax:
routes.MapRoute(
"SpecialLoginRoute",
"login/",
new { controller = "Login", action = "Login", id = UrlParameter.Optional }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
..although, without properly thinking through what you're trying to achieve (that being.. changing what MVC does by default) you're bound to end up with lots and lots of messy routes.
Your return the view from your controller via your Action methods.
public class LoginController:Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
//this method will return `~/Views/Login/Index.csthml/aspx` file
}
public ActionResult RecoverPassword()
{
return View();
//this method will return `~/Views/Login/RecoverPassword.csthml/aspx` file
}
}
If you need to return a different view (other than the action method name, you can explicitly mention it
public ActionResult FakeLogin()
{
return View("Login");
//this method will return `~/Views/Login/Login.csthml/aspx` file
}
If you want to return a view which exist in another controller folder, in ~/Views, you can use the full path
public ActionResult FakeLogin2()
{
return View("~/Views/Account/Signin");
//this method will return `~/Views/Account/Signin.csthml/aspx` file
}
I am working on an ASP.NET MVC application. For some reason, everytime I think I understand routing, something pops up that I don't understand. Currently, I have two routes that I can't seem to figure out. My directory structure looks like the following
- Views
- Internal
- Profile
- Index.cshtml
- Input
- Page1.cshtml
In my global.asax.cs file, I have added the following mappings:
routes.MapRoute(
"UserProfileInfo",
"{controller}/profile",
new { controller = "Internal", action = "UserProfileInfo" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Page1",
"{controller}/input/page1",
new { controller = "Internal", action = "Page1" }
);
In MyController, I have the following:
public ActionResult UserProfileInfo()
{
return View("~/Views/internal/profile/Index.cshtml");
}
public ActionResult Page1()
{
return View("~/Views/internal/input/Page1.cshtml");
}
I want to store my actions in a single controller. I thought I had everything setup properly. But I continue to get a 404. What am I doing wrong?
Remove the "Controller" suffix from the controller name in your calls to MapRoute to create a mapping to a class called InternalController. The Controller suffix is appended by the framework when looking for a matching implementation. e.g.:
routes.MapRoute(
"UserProfileInfo",
"{controller}/profile",
new { controller = "Internal", action = "UserProfileInfo" }
);