Related
I'm currently involved in developing a product (developed in C#) that'll be available for downloading and installing for free but in a very limited version. To get access to all the features the user has to pay a license fee and receive a key. That key will then be entered into the application to "unlock" the full version.
As using a license key like that is kind of usual I'm wondering :
How's that usually solved?
How can I generate the key and how can it be validated by the application?
How can I also avoid having a key getting published on the Internet and used by others that haven't paid the license (a key that basically isn't "theirs").
I guess I should also tie the key to the version of application somehow so it'll be possible to charge for new keys in feature versions.
Anything else I should think about in this scenario?
Caveat: you can't prevent users from pirating, but only make it easier for honest users to do the right thing.
Assuming you don't want to do a special build for each user, then:
Generate yourself a secret key for the product
Take the user's name
Concatentate the users name and the secret key and hash with (for example) SHA1
Unpack the SHA1 hash as an alphanumeric string. This is the individual user's "Product Key"
Within the program, do the same hash, and compare with the product key. If equal, OK.
But, I repeat: this won't prevent piracy
I have recently read that this approach is not cryptographically very sound. But this solution is already weak (as the software itself has to include the secret key somewhere), so I don't think this discovery invalidates the solution as far as it goes.
Just thought I really ought to mention this, though; if you're planning to derive something else from this, beware.
There are many ways to generate license keys, but very few of those ways are truly secure. And it's a pity, because for companies, license keys have almost the same value as real cash.
Ideally, you would want your license keys to have the following properties:
Only your company should be able to generate license keys for your products, even if someone completely reverse engineers your products (which WILL happen, I speak from experience). Obfuscating the algorithm or hiding an encryption key within your software is really out of the question if you are serious about controlling licensing. If your product is successful, someone will make a key generator in a matter of days from release.
A license key should be useable on only one computer (or at least you should be able to control this very tightly)
A license key should be short and easy to type or dictate over the phone. You don't want every customer calling the technical support because they don't understand if the key contains a "l" or a "1". Your support department would thank you for this, and you will have lower costs in this area.
So how do you solve these challenges ?
The answer is simple but technically challenging: digital signatures using public key cryptography. Your license keys should be in fact signed "documents", containing some useful data, signed with your company's private key. The signatures should be part of the license key. The product should validate the license keys with the corresponding public key. This way, even if someone has full access to your product's logic, they cannot generate license keys because they don't have the private key. A license key would look like this: BASE32(CONCAT(DATA, PRIVATE_KEY_ENCRYPTED(HASH(DATA))))
The biggest challenge here is that the classical public key algorithms have large signature sizes. RSA512 has an 1024-bit signature. You don't want your license keys to have hundreds of characters.
One of the most powerful approaches is to use elliptic curve cryptography (with careful implementations to avoid the existing patents). ECC keys are like 6 times shorter than RSA keys, for the same strength. You can further reduce the signature sizes using algorithms like the Schnorr digital signature algorithm (patent expired in 2008 - good :) )
This is achievable by product activation (Windows is a good example). Basically, for a customer with a valid license key, you need to generate some "activation data" which is a signed message embedding the computer's hardware id as the signed data. This is usually done over the internet, but only ONCE: the product sends the license key and the computer hardware id to an activation server, and the activation server sends back the signed message (which can also be made short and easy to dictate over the phone). From that moment on, the product does not check the license key at startup, but the activation data, which needs the computer to be the same in order to validate (otherwise, the DATA would be different and the digital signature would not validate). Note that the activation data checking do not require verification over the Internet: it is sufficient to verify the digital signature of the activation data with the public key already embedded in the product.
Well, just eliminate redundant characters like "1", "l", "0", "o" from your keys. Split the license key string into groups of characters.
Simple answer - No matter what scheme you use it can be cracked.
Don't punish honest customers with a system meant to prevent hackers, as hackers will crack it regardless.
A simple hashed code tied to their email or similar is probably good enough. Hardware based IDs always become an issue when people need to reinstall or update hardware.
Good thread on the issue:
http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?biz.5.82298.34
When generating the key, don't forget to concatenate the version and build number to the string you calculate the hash on. That way there won't be a single key that unlocks all everything you ever released.
After you find some keys or patches floating in astalavista.box.sk you'll know that you succeeded in making something popular enough that somebody bothered to crack. Rejoice!
I'm one of the developers behind the Cryptolens software licensing platform and have been working on licensing systems since the age of 14. In this answer, I have included some tips based on experience acquired over the years.
The best way of solving this is by setting up a license key server that each instance of the application will call in order to verify a license key.
Benefits of a license key server
The advantages with a license key server is that:
you can always update or block a license key with immediate effect.
each license key can be locked to certain number of machines (this helps to prevent users from publishing the license key online for others to use).
Considerations
Although verifying licenses online gives you more control over each instance of the application, internet connection is not always present (especially if you target larger enterprises), so we need another way of performing the license key verification.
The solution is to always sign the license key response from the server using a public-key cryptosystem such as RSA or ECC (possibly better if you plan to run on embedded systems). Your application should only have the public key to verify the license key response.
So in case there's no internet connection, you can use the previous license key response instead. Make sure to store both the date and the machine identifier in the response and check that it's not too old (eg. you allow users to be offline at most 30 days, etc) and that the license key response belongs to the correct device.
Note you should always check the certificate of license key response, even if you are connected to the internet), in order to ensure that it has not been changed since it left the server (this still has to be done even if your API to the license key server uses https)
Protecting secret algorithms
Most .NET applications can be reverse engineered quite easily (there is both a diassembler provided by Microsoft to get the IL code and some commercial products can even retrieve the source code in eg. C#). Of course, you can always obfuscate the code, but it's never 100% secure.
I most cases, the purpose of any software licensing solution is to help honest people being honest (i.e. that honest users who are willing to pay don't forget to pay after a trial expires, etc).
However, you may still have some code that you by no means want to leak out to the public (eg. an algorithm to predict stock prices, etc). In this case, the only way to go is to create an API endpoint that your application will call each time the method should be executed. It requires internet connection but it ensures that your secret code is never executed by the client machine.
Implementation
If you don't want to implement everything yourself, I would recommend to take a look at this tutorial (part of Cryptolens)
Besides what has already been stated....
Any use of .NET applications are inherently breakable because of the intermediate language issues. A simple disassembly of the .NET code will open your product to anyone. They can easily bypass your licensing code at that point.
You can't even use hardware values to create a key anymore. Virtual machines now allow someone to create an image of a 'licensed' machine and run it on any platform they choose.
If it's expensive software there are other solutions. If it's not, just make it difficult enough for the casual hacker. And accept the fact that there will be unlicensed copies out there eventually.
If your product is complicated, the inherent support issues will be create some protection for you.
The C# / .NET engine we use for licence key generation is now maintained as open source:
https://github.com/appsoftware/.NET-Licence-Key-Generator.
It's based on a "Partial Key Verification" system which means only a subset of the key that you use to generate the key has to be compiled into your distributable. You create the keys your self, so the licence implementation is unique to your software.
As stated above, if your code can be decompiled, it's relatively easy to circumvent most licencing systems.
I've used Crypkey in the past. It's one of many available.
You can only protect software up to a point with any licensing scheme.
I don't know how elaborate you want to get
but i believe that .net can access the hard drive serial number.
you could have the program send you that and something eles ( like user name and mac address of the nic)
you compute a code based off that and email them back the key.
they will keep them from switching machines after they have the key.
I strongly believe, that only public key cryptography based licensing system is the right approach here, because you don't have to include essential information required for license generation into your sourcecode.
In the past, I've used Treek's Licensing Library many times, because it fullfills this requirements and offers really good price. It uses the same license protection for end users and itself and noone cracked that until now. You can also find good tips on the website to avoid piracy and cracking.
The only way to do everything you asked for is to require an internet access and verification with a server. The application needs to sign in to the server with the key, and then you need to store the session details, like the IP address. This will prevent the key from being used on several different machines. This is usually not very popular with the users of the application, and unless this is a very expensive and complicated application it's not worth it.
You could just have a license key for the application, and then check client side if the key is good, but it is easy to distribute this key to other users, and with a decompiler new keys can be generated.
I've implemented internet-based one-time activation on my company's software (C# .net) that requires a license key that refers to a license stored in the server's database. The software hits the server with the key and is given license information that is then encrypted locally using an RSA key generated from some variables (a combination of CPUID and other stuff that won't change often) on the client computer and then stores it in the registry.
It requires some server-side coding, but it has worked really well for us and I was able to use the same system when we expanded to browser-based software. It also gives your sales people great info about who, where and when the software is being used. Any licensing system that is only handled locally is fully vulnerable to exploitation, especially with reflection in .NET. But, like everyone else has said, no system is wholly secure.
In my opinion, if you aren't using web-based licensing, there's no real point to protecting the software at all. With the headache that DRM can cause, it's not fair to the users who have actually paid for it to suffer.
You can use a free third party solution to handle this for you such as Quantum-Key.Net It's free and handles payments via paypal through a web sales page it creates for you, key issuing via email and locks key use to a specific computer to prevent piracy.
Your should also take care to obfuscate/encrypt your code or it can easily be reverse engineered using software such as De4dot and .NetReflector. A good free code obfuscator is ConfuserEx wich is fast and simple to use and more effective than expensive alternatives.
You should run your finished software through De4Dot and .NetReflector to reverse-engineer it and see what a cracker would see if they did the same thing and to make sure you have not left any important code exposed or undisguised.
Your software will still be crackable but for the casual cracker it may well be enough to put them off and these simple steps will also prevent your code being extracted and re-used.
https://quantum-key.net
How to use ConfuserEx?
https://github.com/0xd4d/de4dot
https://www.red-gate.com/dynamic/products/dotnet-development/reflector/download
I know this is an old question, but I referenced this when I was re-writing my licensing process for one of my applications.
After reading a lot of opinions out there and relying on past experience with license codes I came up with this process.
public static class LicenseGenerator
{
private static string validChars = "ACEFHJKMNPRSTUVWXYZ234579";
private static Random rnd = new Random(Guid.NewGuid().GetHashCode());
/// <summary>
/// Generate a license code
/// </summary>
/// <param name="length">length of each phrase</param>
/// <param name="number">number of phrases separated by a '-'</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static string GetNewCode(int length, int number)
{
string license = string.Empty;
for (int numberOfPhrases = 0; numberOfPhrases < number; numberOfPhrases++)
{
license += getPhrase(length);
if (numberOfPhrases < number)
license += "-";
}
return license.TrimEnd('-');
}
/// <summary>
/// generate a phrase
/// </summary>
/// <param name="length">length of phrase</param>
/// <returns></returns>
private static string getPhrase(int length)
{
string phrase = string.Empty;
for (int loop = 0; loop < length; loop++)
{
phrase += validChars[rnd.Next(validChars.Length)];
}
return phrase;
}
}
You really don't want to provide a code that has similar letters; it makes for a mess when the end user goes to enter it in. Letters like 6 and G, B and 8, L, I, and 1. Of course if you do want them, you can always add them back in... The above code will generate a license like xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx using the characters in "validChars". Calling GetNewCode(4, 4) will return a code like above.
I'm using Azure functions to register then validate the code. When my app registers the code, it generates an encrypted hash with things that are unique to the install, device and/or user. That is provided to the registration function and is stored with the key in the DB in Azure.
The validate regenerates the key and provides it with the license code, IP address (which in my case will not change and if it does then it will need to be updated anyway), and the regenerated hash then the Azure function returns if the application is licensed. I do store a "temporary" key on their server that allows the app to run for a period of time without talking back up.
Of course, my app must be on the net for it to work regardless.
So, the end result is a simple key for the end user to type in and an easy process to manage the license on the backend. I can also invalidate a license if need be.
I solved it by interfacing my program with a discord server, where it checks in a specific chat if the product key entered by the user exists and is still valid. In this way to receive a product key the user would be forced to hack discord and it is very difficult.
We have an application which contains sensitive information and I'm trying my best to secure it. The sensitive information includes:
The main algorithm
The keys for an encryption/decryption algorithm
I've been looking at Obfuscating the code but it doesn't seem to help much as I can still decompile it. However, my biggest concern is that the keys used for encryption of serial numbers etc are clearly visible when you decompile the code, even when it's Obfuscated.
Can anyone suggest how I can secure these strings?
I realise one of the methods might be to remove any decryption from the application itself, while this may be possible in part, there are some features which have to use encryption/decryption - mainly to save a config file and to pass an 'authorisation' token to a DLL to perform a calculation.
There are ways to do what you want, but it isn't cheap and it isn't easy.
Is it worth it?
When looking at whether to protect software, we first have to answer a number of questions:
How likely is this to happen?
What is the value to someone else of your algorithm and data?
What is the cost to them of buying a license to use your software?
What is the cost to them of replicating your algorithm and data?
What is the cost to them of reverse engineering your algorithm and data?
What is the cost to you of protecting your algorithm and data?
If these produce a significant economic imperative to protect your algorithm/data then you should look into doing it. For instance if the value of the service and cost to customers are both high, but the cost of reverse engineering your code is much lower than the cost of developing it themselves, then people may attempt it.
So, this leads on to your question
How do you secure your algorithm and data?
Discouragement
Obfuscation
The option you suggest, obfuscating the code, messes with the economics above - it tries to significantly increase the cost to them (5 above) without increasing the cost to you (6) very much. The research by the Center for Encrypted Functionalities has done some interesting research on this. The problem is that as with DVD encryption it is doomed to failure if there is enough of a differential between 3, 4 and 5 then eventually someone will do it.
Detection
Another option might be a form of Steganography, which allows you to identify who decrypted your data and started distributing it. For instance, if you have 100 different float values as part of your data, and a 1bit error in the LSB of each of those values wouldn't cause a problem with your application, encode a unique (to each customer) identifier into those bits. The problem is, if someone has access to multiple copies of your application data, it would be obvious that it differs, making it easier to identify the hidden message.
Protection
SaaS - Software as a Service
A more secure option might be to provide the critical part of your software as a service, rather than include it in your application.
Conceptually, your application would collect up all of the data required to run your algorithm, package it up as a request to a server (controlled by you) in the cloud, your service would then calculate your results and pass it back to the client, which would display it.
This keeps all of your proprietary, confidential data and algorithms within a domain that you control completely, and removes any possibility of a client extracting either.
The obvious downside is that clients are tied into your service provision, are at the mercy of your servers and their internet connection. Unfortunately many people object to SaaS for exactly these reasons. On the plus side, they are always up to date with bug fixes, and your compute cluster is likely to be higher performance than the PC they are running the user interface on.
This would be a huge step to take though, and could have a huge cost 6 above, but is one of the few ways to keep your algorithm and data completely secure.
Software Protection Dongles
Although traditional Software Protection Dongles would protect from software piracy, they wouldn't protect against algorithms and data in your code being extracted.
Newer Code Porting dongles (such as SenseLock†) appear to be able to do what you want though. With these devices, you take code out of your application and port it to the secure dongle processor. As with SaaS, your application would bundle up the data, pass it to the dongle (probably a USB device attached to your computer) and read back the results.
Unlike SaaS, data bandwidth would be unlikely to be an issue, but performance of your application may be limited by the performance of your SDP.
† This was the first example I could find with a google search.
Trusted platform
Another option, which may become viable in the future is to use a Trusted Platform Module and Trusted Execution Technology to secure critical areas of the code. Whenever a customer installs your software, they would provide you with a fingerprint of their hardware and you would provide them with a unlock key for that specific system.
This key would would then allow the code to be decrypted and executed within the trusted environment, where the encrypted code and data would be inaccessible outside of the trusted platform. If anything at all about the trusted environment changed, it would invalidate the key and that functionality would be lost.
For the customer this has the advantage that their data stays local, and they don't need to buy a new dongle to improve performance, but it has the potential to create an ongoing support requirement and the likelihood that your customers would become frustrated with the hoops they had to jump through to use software they have bought and paid for - losing you good will.
Conclusion
What you want to do is not simple or cheap. It could require a big investment in software, infrastructure or both. You need to know that it is worth the investment before you start along this road.
All efforts will be futile if someone is motivated enough to break it. No one has managed to figure this out yet, even the biggest software companies.
I'm trying my best to secure it
I'm not saying this as a scathing criticism, just you need to be aware of what your trying to achieve is currently assumed to be impossible.
Obfuscation is security through obscurity, it does have some benefit as it will deter the most incompetent of hacker attempts, but largely it is wasted effort that could perhaps be better spent in other areas of development.
In answer to your original question, you are going to run into problems with intelligent compilers, they might automatically piece together the string into the compiled application removing some of your obfuscation efforts as a compilation optimisations. It would be hard to maintain as well, so I would reconsider your risk analysis model and perhaps resign yourself to the fact it can be cracked and if it has any value probably will be.
I recently read a very simple solution to OP.
Simple declare your constants as readonly string, not const string. That simple. Apparently const variables get written to a stack area in the binary but written as plain text whereas readonly strings get added to the constructor and written as a byte array instead of text.
I.e. If you search for it, you won't find it.
That was the question, right?
Using a custom algorithm (security through obscurity?), combined with storing the key inside the application, is simply not secure.
If you are storing some kind of a password, then you can use a one-way hashing function to ensure that decrypted data is unavailable anywhere in your code.
If you need to use a symmetric encryption algorithm, use a well known and tested one, like AES-256. But the key obviously cannot be stored inside your code.
[Edit]
Since you mentioned encryption of serial numbers, I believe you a one-way hashing function (like SHA-256) would really suit your needs better.
The idea is to hash your serial numbers during build time into their hashed representations, which cannot be reversed (SHA-256 is considered to be a pretty safe algorithm, compared to, say, MD5). During run time, you only need to apply the same hash function to the user input, and compare hashed values only. This way none of the actual serial numbers are available to the attacker.
#Tom Gullen have given a proper answer.
I merely got some suggestions on how you can make it harder for the users to access your keys and algorithm.
As for the algorithm: Do not compile your algorithm at compile time, but at runtime. To be able to do this you need to specify an interface which contains the methods for the algorithm. The interface is used to run it. Then add the source code for the algorithm as an encrypted string (embedded resource). Decrypt it at runtime and use CodeDom to compile it into a .NET class.
Keys: The usual way is to store spread parts of your key in different places in the application. Store each part as byte[] instead of string to make it a bit harder to find them.
If all your users have an internet connection: Fetch the algorithm source code and the keys using SSL instead.
Note that everything will be pieced together at runtime, anyone with a bit of more knowledge can inspect/debug your application to find everything.
i dont think you can easily obfuscate string constants, so if possible, dont use them :) you can use assembly resources instead, those you can encrypt however you want.
Depends what you're trying to do but can you use asymmetric encryption? That way you only need to store public keys with no need to obfuscate them.
I need to save several documents to the cloud and need to save the documents, document metadata, and words/phrases for searching.
My plan is to use a symmetric cypher for encrypting the whole document, but I'm unsure of the right way to hash each word. I would like something secure, but I don't want to increase the count of characters in each word unnecessarily.
What implementation is most suitable for doing a symmetric encryption against a document, and what is the best way to hash a word or phrase without making it many times larger than it needs to be?
First, I suggest different tags. It sounds like you're really interested in offloading searching to a server in a cryptographically secure way (such that the server doesn't have access to the plaintext and such that the client need not transfer the entire index).
Issues:
An attacker being able to figure out which words are in the index (and which are not) could be an issue for you. You should state whether it is as a part of your requirements.
An attacker being able to figure out which items in the index occur more frequently could be an issue for you. You should state whether it is as a part of your requirements.
An attacker being able to associate words with a document could be an issue for you. You should state whether it is as a part of your requirements.
An attacker may be able to subvert the server entirely and observe queries / retrievals. You should state security needs in this circumstance as well.
Probably others I haven't thought of.
I'm assuming that you're designing your own, but there is probably some prior art, research, etc. that would be smarter than I am below:
For the first, I suggest that you should hash the words, combining the plaintext with a secret (not shared with the index server) before hashing, and truncating the hash to the point where it is likely to be non-unique in the index. This costs you hash efficiency, but helps prevent an attacker from using the hash as a plaintext equivalent or experimentally determining the secret
For the second and third, you should encrypt any indexed data (such as counts or document+position) and decrypt it on the client. This may cost you latency.
For the fourth, you'd want to consider concealing real requests inside groups of unrelated requests, things like that, but you'd want a lot of math to make sure you weren't still vulnerable to statistical analysis.
For the fifth, do some web research. I'm confident there will be stuff out there, and this is a pretty specific (and less common) need, so you'll want someone who put more thought into it than I just have.
Your requirements are mutually exclusive. That kind of metadata will leak a huge amount of information about the document content, to the point it can't be called secure.
Furthermore, encrypting individual words is futile. The difficulty of breaking encryption is usually said to be as difficult as breaking the key, but this assumes the information content in the plaintext is greater than that in the key. For single words, that certainly isn't true.
How can I create a product key for my C# Application?
I need to create a product (or license) key that I update annually. Additionally I need to create one for trial versions.
Related:
How do I best obfuscate my C# product license verification code?
How do you protect your software from illegal distribution?
You can do something like create a record which contains the data you want to authenticate to the application. This could include anything you want - e.g. program features to enable, expiry date, name of the user (if you want to bind it to a user). Then encrypt that using some crypto algorithm with a fixed key or hash it. Then you just verify it within your program. One way to distribute the license file (on windows) is to provide it as a file which updates the registry (saves the user having to type it).
Beware of false sense of security though - sooner or later someone will simply patch your program to skip that check, and distribute the patched version. Or, they will work out a key that passes all checks and distribute that, or backdate the clock, etc. It doesn't matter how convoluted you make your scheme, anything you do for this will ultimately be security through obscurity and they will always be able to this. Even if they can't someone will, and will distribute the hacked version. Same applies even if you supply a dongle - if someone wants to, they can patch out the check for that too. Digitally signing your code won't help, they can remove that signature, or resign it.
You can complicate matters a bit by using techniques to prevent the program running in a debugger etc, but even this is not bullet proof. So you should just make it difficult enough that an honest user will not forget to pay. Also be very careful that your scheme does not become obtrusive to paying users - it's better to have some ripped off copies than for your paying customers not to be able to use what they have paid for.
Another option is to have an online check - just provide the user with a unique ID, and check online as to what capabilities that ID should have, and cache it for some period. All the same caveats apply though - people can get round anything like this.
Consider also the support costs of having to deal with users who have forgotten their key, etc.
edit: I just want to add, don't invest too much time in this or think that somehow your convoluted scheme will be different and uncrackable. It won't, and cannot be as long as people control the hardware and OS your program runs on. Developers have been trying to come up with ever more complex schemes for this, thinking that if they develop their own system for it then it will be known only to them and therefore 'more secure'. But it really is the programming equivalent of trying to build a perpetual motion machine. :-)
Who do you trust?
I've always considered this area too critical to trust a third party to manage the runtime security of your application. Once that component is cracked for one application, it's cracked for all applications. It happened to Discreet in five minutes once they went with a third-party license solution for 3ds Max years ago... Good times!
Seriously, consider rolling your own for having complete control over your algorithm. If you do, consider using components in your key along the lines of:
License Name - the name of client (if any) you're licensing. Useful for managing company deployments - make them feel special to have a "personalised" name in the license information you supply them.
Date of license expiry
Number of users to run under the same license. This assumes you have a way of tracking running instances across a site, in a server-ish way
Feature codes - to let you use the same licensing system across multiple features, and across multiple products. Of course if it's cracked for one product it's cracked for all.
Then checksum the hell out of them and add whatever (reversable) encryption you want to it to make it harder to crack.
To make a trial license key, simply have set values for the above values that translate as "trial mode".
And since this is now probably the most important code in your application/company, on top of/instead of obfuscation consider putting the decrypt routines in a native DLL file and simply P/Invoke to it.
Several companies I've worked for have adopted generalised approaches for this with great success. Or maybe the products weren't worth cracking ;)
If you are asking about the keys that you can type in, like Windows product keys, then they are based on some checks. If you are talking about the keys that you have to copy paste, then they are based on a digitial signature (private key encryption).
A simple product key logic could be to start with saying that the product key consists of four 5-digit groups, like abcde-fghij-kljmo-pqrst, and then go on to specify internal relationships like f+k+p should equal a, meaning the first digits of the 2, 3 and 4 group should total to a. This means that 8xxxx-2xxxx-4xxxx-2xxxx is valid, so is 8xxxx-1xxxx-0xxxx-7xxxx. Of course, there would be other relationships as well, including complex relations like, if the second digit of the first group is odd, then the last digit of the last group should be odd too. This way there would be generators for product keys and verification of product keys would simply check if it matches all the rules.
Encryption are normally the string of information about the license encrypted using a private key (== digitally signed) and converted to Base64. The public key is distributed with the application. When the Base64 string arrives, it is verified (==decrypted) by the public key and if found valid, the product is activated.
Whether it's trivial or hard to crack, I'm not sure that it really makes much of a difference.
The likelihood of your app being cracked is far more proportional to its usefulness rather than the strength of the product key handling.
Personally, I think there are two classes of user. Those who pay. Those who don't. The ones that do will likely do so with even the most trivial protection. Those who don't will wait for a crack or look elsewhere. Either way, it won't get you any more money.
I have to admit I'd do something rather insane.
Find a CPU bottleneck and extract it to a P/Invokeable DLL file.
As a post build action, encrypt part of the DLL file with an XOR
encryption key.
Select a public/private key scheme, include public key in the DLL file
Arrange so that decrypting the product key and XORing the two
halves together results in the encryption key for the DLL.
In the DLL's DllMain code, disable protection (PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE)
and decrypt it with the key.
Make a LicenseCheck() method that makes a sanity check of the
license key and parameters, then checksums entire DLL file, throwing
license violation on either. Oh, and do some other initialization
here.
When they find and remove the LicenseCheck, what fun will follow
when the DLL starts segmentation faulting.
There is the option Microsoft Software Licensing and Protection (SLP) Services as well. After reading about it I really wish I could use it.
I really like the idea of blocking parts of code based on the license. Hot stuff, and the most secure for .NET. Interesting read even if you don't use it!
Microsoft® Software Licensing and
Protection (SLP) Services is a
software activation service that
enables independent software vendors
(ISVs) to adopt flexible licensing
terms for their customers. Microsoft
SLP Services employs a unique
protection method that helps safeguard
your application and licensing
information allowing you to get to
market faster while increasing
customer compliance.
Note: This is the only way I would release a product with sensitive code (such as a valuable algorithm).
If you want a simple solution just to create and verify serial numbers, try Ellipter. It uses elliptic curves cryptography and has an "Expiration Date" feature so you can create trial verisons or time-limited registration keys.
Another good inexpensive tool for product keys and activations is a product called InstallKey. Take a look at www.lomacons.com
One simple method is using a Globally Unique Identifier (GUID). GUIDs are usually stored as 128-bit values and are commonly displayed as 32 hexadecimal digits with groups separated by hyphens, such as {21EC2020-3AEA-4069-A2DD-08002B30309D}.
Use the following code in C# by System.Guid.NewGuid().
getKey = System.Guid.NewGuid().ToString().Substring(0, 8).ToUpper(); //Will generate a random 8 digit hexadecimal string.
_key = Convert.ToString(Regex.Replace(getKey, ".{4}", "$0/")); // And use this to separate every four digits with a "/".
I hope it helps.
The trick is to have an algorithm that only you know (such that it could be decoded at the other end).
There are simple things like, "Pick a prime number and add a magic number to it"
More convoluted options such as using asymmetric encryption of a set of binary data (that could include a unique identifier, version numbers, etc) and distribute the encrypted data as the key.
Might also be worth reading the responses to this question as well
There are some tools and API's available for it. However, I do not think you'll find one for free ;)
There is for instance the OLicense suite:
http://www.olicense.de/index.php?lang=en
Please check this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/38598174/1275924
The idea is to use Cryptolens as the license server. Here's a step-by-step example (in C# and VB.NET). I've also attached a code snippet for key verification below (in C#):
var licenseKey = "GEBNC-WZZJD-VJIHG-GCMVD";
var RSAPubKey = "{enter the RSA Public key here}";
var auth = "{access token with permission to access the activate method}";
var result = Key.Activate(token: auth, parameters: new ActivateModel()
{
Key = licenseKey,
ProductId = 3349,
Sign = true,
MachineCode = Helpers.GetMachineCode()
});
if (result == null || result.Result == ResultType.Error ||
!result.LicenseKey.HasValidSignature(RSAPubKey).IsValid())
{
// an error occurred or the key is invalid or it cannot be activated
// (eg. the limit of activated devices was achieved)
Console.WriteLine("The license does not work.");
}
else
{
// everything went fine if we are here!
Console.WriteLine("The license is valid!");
}
Console.ReadLine();
You can check LicenseSpot. It provides:
Free Licensing Component
Online Activation
API to integrate your app and online store
Serial number generation
Revoke licenses
Subscription Management
I'm going to piggyback a bit on #frankodwyer's great answer and dig a little deeper into online-based licensing. I'm the founder of Keygen, a licensing REST API built for developers.
Since you mentioned wanting 2 "types" of licenses for your application, i.e. a "full version" and a "trial version", we can simplify that and use a feature license model where you license specific features of your application (in this case, there's a "full" feature-set and a "trial" feature-set).
To start off, we could create 2 license types (called policies in Keygen) and whenever a user registers an account you can generate a "trial" license for them to start out (the "trial" license implements our "trial" feature policy), which you can use to do various checks within the app e.g. can user use Trial-Feature-A and Trial-Feature-B.
And building on that, whenever a user purchases your app (whether you're using PayPal, Stripe, etc.), you can generate a license implementing the "full" feature policy and associate it with the user's account. Now within your app you can check if the user has a "full" license that can do Pro-Feature-X and Pro-Feature-Y (by doing something like user.HasLicenseFor(FEATURE_POLICY_ID)).
I mentioned allowing your users to create user accounts—what do I mean by that? I've gone into this in detail in a couple other answers, but a quick rundown as to why I think this is a superior way to authenticate and identify your users:
User accounts let you associate multiple licenses and multiple machines to a single user, giving you insight into your customer's behavior and to prompt them for "in-app purchases" i.e. purchasing your "full" version (kind of like mobile apps).
We shouldn't require our customers to input long license keys, which are both tedious to input and hard to keep track of i.e. they get lost easily. (Try searching "lost license key" on Twitter!)
Customers are accustomed to using an email/password; I think we should do what people are used to doing so that we can provide a good user experience (UX).
Of course, if you don't want to handle user accounts and you want your users to input license keys, that's completely fine (and Keygen supports doing that as well). I'm just offering another way to go about handling that aspect of licensing and hopefully provide a nice UX for your customers.
Finally since you also mentioned that you want to update these licenses annually, you can set a duration on your policies so that "full" licenses will expire after a year and "trial" licenses last say 2 weeks, requiring that your users purchase a new license after expiration.
I could dig in more, getting into associating machines with users and things like that, but I thought I'd try to keep this answer short and focus on simply licensing features to your users.
I'm currently involved in developing a product (developed in C#) that'll be available for downloading and installing for free but in a very limited version. To get access to all the features the user has to pay a license fee and receive a key. That key will then be entered into the application to "unlock" the full version.
As using a license key like that is kind of usual I'm wondering :
How's that usually solved?
How can I generate the key and how can it be validated by the application?
How can I also avoid having a key getting published on the Internet and used by others that haven't paid the license (a key that basically isn't "theirs").
I guess I should also tie the key to the version of application somehow so it'll be possible to charge for new keys in feature versions.
Anything else I should think about in this scenario?
Caveat: you can't prevent users from pirating, but only make it easier for honest users to do the right thing.
Assuming you don't want to do a special build for each user, then:
Generate yourself a secret key for the product
Take the user's name
Concatentate the users name and the secret key and hash with (for example) SHA1
Unpack the SHA1 hash as an alphanumeric string. This is the individual user's "Product Key"
Within the program, do the same hash, and compare with the product key. If equal, OK.
But, I repeat: this won't prevent piracy
I have recently read that this approach is not cryptographically very sound. But this solution is already weak (as the software itself has to include the secret key somewhere), so I don't think this discovery invalidates the solution as far as it goes.
Just thought I really ought to mention this, though; if you're planning to derive something else from this, beware.
There are many ways to generate license keys, but very few of those ways are truly secure. And it's a pity, because for companies, license keys have almost the same value as real cash.
Ideally, you would want your license keys to have the following properties:
Only your company should be able to generate license keys for your products, even if someone completely reverse engineers your products (which WILL happen, I speak from experience). Obfuscating the algorithm or hiding an encryption key within your software is really out of the question if you are serious about controlling licensing. If your product is successful, someone will make a key generator in a matter of days from release.
A license key should be useable on only one computer (or at least you should be able to control this very tightly)
A license key should be short and easy to type or dictate over the phone. You don't want every customer calling the technical support because they don't understand if the key contains a "l" or a "1". Your support department would thank you for this, and you will have lower costs in this area.
So how do you solve these challenges ?
The answer is simple but technically challenging: digital signatures using public key cryptography. Your license keys should be in fact signed "documents", containing some useful data, signed with your company's private key. The signatures should be part of the license key. The product should validate the license keys with the corresponding public key. This way, even if someone has full access to your product's logic, they cannot generate license keys because they don't have the private key. A license key would look like this: BASE32(CONCAT(DATA, PRIVATE_KEY_ENCRYPTED(HASH(DATA))))
The biggest challenge here is that the classical public key algorithms have large signature sizes. RSA512 has an 1024-bit signature. You don't want your license keys to have hundreds of characters.
One of the most powerful approaches is to use elliptic curve cryptography (with careful implementations to avoid the existing patents). ECC keys are like 6 times shorter than RSA keys, for the same strength. You can further reduce the signature sizes using algorithms like the Schnorr digital signature algorithm (patent expired in 2008 - good :) )
This is achievable by product activation (Windows is a good example). Basically, for a customer with a valid license key, you need to generate some "activation data" which is a signed message embedding the computer's hardware id as the signed data. This is usually done over the internet, but only ONCE: the product sends the license key and the computer hardware id to an activation server, and the activation server sends back the signed message (which can also be made short and easy to dictate over the phone). From that moment on, the product does not check the license key at startup, but the activation data, which needs the computer to be the same in order to validate (otherwise, the DATA would be different and the digital signature would not validate). Note that the activation data checking do not require verification over the Internet: it is sufficient to verify the digital signature of the activation data with the public key already embedded in the product.
Well, just eliminate redundant characters like "1", "l", "0", "o" from your keys. Split the license key string into groups of characters.
Simple answer - No matter what scheme you use it can be cracked.
Don't punish honest customers with a system meant to prevent hackers, as hackers will crack it regardless.
A simple hashed code tied to their email or similar is probably good enough. Hardware based IDs always become an issue when people need to reinstall or update hardware.
Good thread on the issue:
http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?biz.5.82298.34
When generating the key, don't forget to concatenate the version and build number to the string you calculate the hash on. That way there won't be a single key that unlocks all everything you ever released.
After you find some keys or patches floating in astalavista.box.sk you'll know that you succeeded in making something popular enough that somebody bothered to crack. Rejoice!
I'm one of the developers behind the Cryptolens software licensing platform and have been working on licensing systems since the age of 14. In this answer, I have included some tips based on experience acquired over the years.
The best way of solving this is by setting up a license key server that each instance of the application will call in order to verify a license key.
Benefits of a license key server
The advantages with a license key server is that:
you can always update or block a license key with immediate effect.
each license key can be locked to certain number of machines (this helps to prevent users from publishing the license key online for others to use).
Considerations
Although verifying licenses online gives you more control over each instance of the application, internet connection is not always present (especially if you target larger enterprises), so we need another way of performing the license key verification.
The solution is to always sign the license key response from the server using a public-key cryptosystem such as RSA or ECC (possibly better if you plan to run on embedded systems). Your application should only have the public key to verify the license key response.
So in case there's no internet connection, you can use the previous license key response instead. Make sure to store both the date and the machine identifier in the response and check that it's not too old (eg. you allow users to be offline at most 30 days, etc) and that the license key response belongs to the correct device.
Note you should always check the certificate of license key response, even if you are connected to the internet), in order to ensure that it has not been changed since it left the server (this still has to be done even if your API to the license key server uses https)
Protecting secret algorithms
Most .NET applications can be reverse engineered quite easily (there is both a diassembler provided by Microsoft to get the IL code and some commercial products can even retrieve the source code in eg. C#). Of course, you can always obfuscate the code, but it's never 100% secure.
I most cases, the purpose of any software licensing solution is to help honest people being honest (i.e. that honest users who are willing to pay don't forget to pay after a trial expires, etc).
However, you may still have some code that you by no means want to leak out to the public (eg. an algorithm to predict stock prices, etc). In this case, the only way to go is to create an API endpoint that your application will call each time the method should be executed. It requires internet connection but it ensures that your secret code is never executed by the client machine.
Implementation
If you don't want to implement everything yourself, I would recommend to take a look at this tutorial (part of Cryptolens)
Besides what has already been stated....
Any use of .NET applications are inherently breakable because of the intermediate language issues. A simple disassembly of the .NET code will open your product to anyone. They can easily bypass your licensing code at that point.
You can't even use hardware values to create a key anymore. Virtual machines now allow someone to create an image of a 'licensed' machine and run it on any platform they choose.
If it's expensive software there are other solutions. If it's not, just make it difficult enough for the casual hacker. And accept the fact that there will be unlicensed copies out there eventually.
If your product is complicated, the inherent support issues will be create some protection for you.
The C# / .NET engine we use for licence key generation is now maintained as open source:
https://github.com/appsoftware/.NET-Licence-Key-Generator.
It's based on a "Partial Key Verification" system which means only a subset of the key that you use to generate the key has to be compiled into your distributable. You create the keys your self, so the licence implementation is unique to your software.
As stated above, if your code can be decompiled, it's relatively easy to circumvent most licencing systems.
I've used Crypkey in the past. It's one of many available.
You can only protect software up to a point with any licensing scheme.
I don't know how elaborate you want to get
but i believe that .net can access the hard drive serial number.
you could have the program send you that and something eles ( like user name and mac address of the nic)
you compute a code based off that and email them back the key.
they will keep them from switching machines after they have the key.
I strongly believe, that only public key cryptography based licensing system is the right approach here, because you don't have to include essential information required for license generation into your sourcecode.
In the past, I've used Treek's Licensing Library many times, because it fullfills this requirements and offers really good price. It uses the same license protection for end users and itself and noone cracked that until now. You can also find good tips on the website to avoid piracy and cracking.
The only way to do everything you asked for is to require an internet access and verification with a server. The application needs to sign in to the server with the key, and then you need to store the session details, like the IP address. This will prevent the key from being used on several different machines. This is usually not very popular with the users of the application, and unless this is a very expensive and complicated application it's not worth it.
You could just have a license key for the application, and then check client side if the key is good, but it is easy to distribute this key to other users, and with a decompiler new keys can be generated.
I've implemented internet-based one-time activation on my company's software (C# .net) that requires a license key that refers to a license stored in the server's database. The software hits the server with the key and is given license information that is then encrypted locally using an RSA key generated from some variables (a combination of CPUID and other stuff that won't change often) on the client computer and then stores it in the registry.
It requires some server-side coding, but it has worked really well for us and I was able to use the same system when we expanded to browser-based software. It also gives your sales people great info about who, where and when the software is being used. Any licensing system that is only handled locally is fully vulnerable to exploitation, especially with reflection in .NET. But, like everyone else has said, no system is wholly secure.
In my opinion, if you aren't using web-based licensing, there's no real point to protecting the software at all. With the headache that DRM can cause, it's not fair to the users who have actually paid for it to suffer.
You can use a free third party solution to handle this for you such as Quantum-Key.Net It's free and handles payments via paypal through a web sales page it creates for you, key issuing via email and locks key use to a specific computer to prevent piracy.
Your should also take care to obfuscate/encrypt your code or it can easily be reverse engineered using software such as De4dot and .NetReflector. A good free code obfuscator is ConfuserEx wich is fast and simple to use and more effective than expensive alternatives.
You should run your finished software through De4Dot and .NetReflector to reverse-engineer it and see what a cracker would see if they did the same thing and to make sure you have not left any important code exposed or undisguised.
Your software will still be crackable but for the casual cracker it may well be enough to put them off and these simple steps will also prevent your code being extracted and re-used.
https://quantum-key.net
How to use ConfuserEx?
https://github.com/0xd4d/de4dot
https://www.red-gate.com/dynamic/products/dotnet-development/reflector/download
I know this is an old question, but I referenced this when I was re-writing my licensing process for one of my applications.
After reading a lot of opinions out there and relying on past experience with license codes I came up with this process.
public static class LicenseGenerator
{
private static string validChars = "ACEFHJKMNPRSTUVWXYZ234579";
private static Random rnd = new Random(Guid.NewGuid().GetHashCode());
/// <summary>
/// Generate a license code
/// </summary>
/// <param name="length">length of each phrase</param>
/// <param name="number">number of phrases separated by a '-'</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static string GetNewCode(int length, int number)
{
string license = string.Empty;
for (int numberOfPhrases = 0; numberOfPhrases < number; numberOfPhrases++)
{
license += getPhrase(length);
if (numberOfPhrases < number)
license += "-";
}
return license.TrimEnd('-');
}
/// <summary>
/// generate a phrase
/// </summary>
/// <param name="length">length of phrase</param>
/// <returns></returns>
private static string getPhrase(int length)
{
string phrase = string.Empty;
for (int loop = 0; loop < length; loop++)
{
phrase += validChars[rnd.Next(validChars.Length)];
}
return phrase;
}
}
You really don't want to provide a code that has similar letters; it makes for a mess when the end user goes to enter it in. Letters like 6 and G, B and 8, L, I, and 1. Of course if you do want them, you can always add them back in... The above code will generate a license like xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx using the characters in "validChars". Calling GetNewCode(4, 4) will return a code like above.
I'm using Azure functions to register then validate the code. When my app registers the code, it generates an encrypted hash with things that are unique to the install, device and/or user. That is provided to the registration function and is stored with the key in the DB in Azure.
The validate regenerates the key and provides it with the license code, IP address (which in my case will not change and if it does then it will need to be updated anyway), and the regenerated hash then the Azure function returns if the application is licensed. I do store a "temporary" key on their server that allows the app to run for a period of time without talking back up.
Of course, my app must be on the net for it to work regardless.
So, the end result is a simple key for the end user to type in and an easy process to manage the license on the backend. I can also invalidate a license if need be.
I solved it by interfacing my program with a discord server, where it checks in a specific chat if the product key entered by the user exists and is still valid. In this way to receive a product key the user would be forced to hack discord and it is very difficult.