We Keep Coding

Can language localisations be automatically reverse engineered from .resx files?

I'm working with an MVC 4 app that was originally created with the intention of possibly requiring language localisation so there's a heavy use of .resx files and corresponding embedding of references throughout the project. As it turns out, the app will only ever be used by English speaking audiences and indeed no other languages were ever loaded in. What we've got now is an overhead every time we need to put text on a page and increasing inconsistency as English language is hard-coded into places which can't directly access the resource files such as .js files and reference data in the DB.
Short of a lot of copying and pasting, is there any automated way to extract the English language values from the resource files and replace their references in the views? In a perfect world there'd be a tool to do this and certainly it's conceptually scriptable, does anything like this exist already?

You will have to script it. I have done similar stuff with the O2 Platform AST manipulation Mono.Cecil and mono Cecil APIs.
If you give me a small project with the use can you need (a resx file and an MVC view) I can show you a code snippet example

I haven't seen anything that would take care of this. My first thought is because of the localization issues that could be presented in most "out of the box" solution.
This maybe far fetched, but giving it a shot. Could you write a C# app that would load the assembly that holds the resource file, then loop through every file in the project and replace the resource keys with the values?
As you said, it is possible to be scripted, and this seems like the easiest yet crudest way to complete the task in my mind. Depending on the number of resources you're talking about, obviously it maybe easier and safer to copy/paste.

Satellite assemblies..If you have all app resources placed in a project then create the non-default language you want to implement. For example fr_ca.ErrorMsg | en_gb.ErrorMsg and en_Us.ErrorMsg. The default language can be specified in the main Thread.CultureInfo If en_us then fill you en_us file with all entries need and other resources will only be loaded if it does not exist in the default resource->en_us.

Using only 1 resource file instead of 1 resource file per form/other strings

We are localizing our forms and strings in a project and are having a problem; Visual Studio creates a resource file for each form when setting Localizable to true.
It's nothing more than a minor nuisance having to send all of the resource files to translators, but is it possible to get VS to use a global resources file instead?
Thanks!

Like Yoda would say, possible it is.
You will have to dynamically translate the dialogs when they are loaded. I did this on several projects and I would say it's much better than having localized resource files.

As others already said, it is possible to use global resource file manually. I believe that it is actually more problematic and less maintainable but still possible.
Now onto why MS decided on one resource file per form. Well, from Internationalization point of view, this solution is better. On one hand it gives translators one important thing: the context. On the other hand, it is typical for project to grow. It is really unlikely that you will make changes to all forms at once. And you know what? Depending on your deal with translation vendor, you can usually spend less on Localization if just few percent of strings would change. That is just because they can use Translation Memory (TM) software.
With one global resource file, there is usually no context and no way to reasonably use TM. The result is, translations are less accurate and take longer (one needs to actually read large blocks of text to make sure everything is correctly translated).
By the way, you do not need to send out individual resource files. Instead you can use some kind of translation kit generator (or translation manager software) to create something useful for translators (for example translation memory friendly file). Sadly, I cannot give you the names of such tools (although I know that there are few of them) since my employer is using custom system for that and I didn't have a chance to work with other tools.

WinFrom doesn't support generating a global resources for Forms automatically in VS.
You must assign the strings by yourself. For example:
Add a Resources.resx with Resources.designer.cs to your project;
Define your strings in Resources.resx.
In your form.cs code, assign the strings in constructor like:
Label1.Text = Resources.Label1Text;

Reading from a file inside a VS solution

I have an xml file that I want to include along with my program as a template. I would prefer that it be bundled with the .exe when the project is completed.
Is this possible?
If so, how should I reference it in the code? I would assume that referencing "myXML.xml" won't work because, if it is included, the file no longer exists as a standalone object.
An alternative idea is to copy/paste the contents into string, but that seems like a bad idea in so many ways. (It's 900 lines.)
Ideas?
Thank you.
The real motivation behind this is I really prefer standalone executables rather than making the user go through the installation process. Additionally there's the extra benefit that they're less likely to f- it up.

This is quite simple to do, you can store files in any .NET assembly as "Embedded Resources", which can be then accessed at runtime.
See the Microsoft article here for a detailed rundown on how to do this.

Another way is resource files, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7k989cfy%28v=vs.80%29.aspx

Make an executable at runtime

Ok, so I was wondering how one would go about creating a program, that creates a second program(Like how most compression programs can create self extracting self excutables, but that's not what I need).
Say I have 2 programs. Each one containing a class. The one program I would use to modify and fill the class with data. The second file would be a program that also had the class, but empty, and it's only purpose is to access this data in a specific way. I don't know, I'm thinking if the specific class were serialized and then "injected" into the second file. But how would one be able to do that? I've found modifying files that were already compiled fascinating, though I've never been able to make changes that didn't cause errors.
That's just a thought. I don't know what the solution would be, that's just something that crossed my mind.
I'd prefer some information in say c or c++ that's cross-platform. The only other language I'd accept is c#.
also
I'm not looking for 3-rd party library's, or things such as Boost. If anything a shove in the right direction could be all I need.
++also
I don't want to be using a compiler.
Jalf actually read what I wrote
That's exactly what I would like to know how to do. I think that's fairly obvious by what I asked above. I said nothing about compiling the files, or scripting.
QUOTE "I've found modifying files that were already compiled fascinating"
Please read and understand the question first before posting.
thanks.

Building an executable from scratch is hard. First, you'd need to generate machine code for what the program would do, and then you need to encapsulate such code in an executable file. That's overkill unless you want to write a compiler for a language.
These utilities that generate a self-extracting executable don't really make the executable from scratch. They have the executable pre-generated, and the data file is just appended to the end of it. Since the Windows executable format allows you to put data at the end of the file, caring only for the "real executable" part (the exe header tells how big it is - the rest is ignored).
For instance, try to generate two self-extracting zip, and do a binary diff on them. You'll see their first X KBytes are exactly the same, what changes is the rest, which is not an executable at all, it's just data. When the file is executed, it looks what is found at the end of the file (the data) and unzips it.
Take a look at the wikipedia entry, go to the external links section to dig deeper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable
I only mentioned Windows here but the same principles apply to Linux. But don't expect to have cross-platform results, you'll have to re-implement it to each platform. I couldn't imagine something that's more platform-dependent than the executable file. Even if you use C# you'll have to generate the native stub, which is different if you're running on Windows (under .net) or Linux (under Mono).

Invoke a compiler with data generated by your program (write temp files to disk if necessary) and or stored on disk?
Or is the question about the details of writing the local executable format?

Unfortunately with compiled languages such as C, C++, Java, or C#, you won't be able to just ``run'' new code at runtime, like you can do in interpreted languages like PHP, Perl, and ECMAscript. The code has to be compiled first, and for that you will need a compiler. There's no getting around this.
If you need to duplicate the save/restore functionality between two separate EXEs, then your best bet is to create a static library shared between the two programs, or a DLL shared between the two programs. That way, you write that code once and it's able to be used by as many programs as you want.
On the other hand, if you're really running into a scenario like this, my main question is, What are you trying to accomplish with this? Even in languages that support things like eval(), self modifying code is usually some of the nastiest and bug-riddled stuff you're going to find. It's worse even than a program written completely with GOTOs. There are uses for self modifying code like this, but 99% of the time it's the wrong approach to take.
Hope that helps :)

I had the same problem and I think that this solves all problems.
You can put there whatever code and if correct it will produce at runtime second executable.
--ADD--
So in short you have some code which you can hard-code and store in the code of your 1st exe file or let outside it. Then you run it and you compile the aforementioned code. If eveything is ok you will get a second executable runtime- compiled. All this without any external lib!!

Ok, so I was wondering how one would
go about creating a program, that
creates a second program
You can look at CodeDom. Here is a tutorial

Have you considered embedding a scripting language such as Lua or Python into your app? This will give you the ability to dynamically generate and execute code at runtime.
From wikipedia:
Dynamic programming language is a term used broadly in computer science to describe a class of high-level programming languages that execute at runtime many common behaviors that other languages might perform during compilation, if at all. These behaviors could include extension of the program, by adding new code, by extending objects and definitions, or by modifying the type system, all during program execution. These behaviors can be emulated in nearly any language of sufficient complexity, but dynamic languages provide direct tools to make use of them.

Depending on what you call a program, Self-modifying code may do the trick.
Basically, you write code somewhere in memory as if it were plain data, and you call it.
Usually it's a bad idea, but it's quite fun.

Access a settings/preferences file on a server

My application has historically used an ini file on the same file server as the data it consumes is located to store per user settings so that they roam if the user logs on from multiple computers. To do this we had a file that looked like:
[domain\username1]
value1=foo
value2=bar
[domain\username2]
value1=foo
value2=baz
For this release we're trying to migrate away from using ini files due to limitations in the win32 ini read/write functions without having to write a custom ini file parser.
I've looked at app.config and user settings files and neither appear to be suitable. The former needs to be in the same folder as the executable, and the latter doesn't provide any means to create new values at runtime.
Is there a built in option I'm missing, or is my best path to write a preferences class of my own and use the framework's XML serialization to write it out?

I have found that the fastest way here is to just create an XML file that does what you want, then use XSD.exe to create a class and serialize the data. It is fast, and a few lines of code and works quite well.

Have you not checked out or have heard of nini which is a third party ini handler. I found it quite easy to use and simple in reading/writing to ini file.
For your benefit, it would mean very little changes, and easier to use.
The conversion from ini to another format needs to be weighed up, like the code impact, ease of programming (nitpicky aside, changing the code to use xml may be easy but it is limiting in that you cannot write to it). What would be the benefit in ripping out the ini codes and replace it with xml is a question you have to decide?
There may well be a knock on effect such as having to change it and adapt the code...but... for the for-seeable time, sure, ini is a bit outdated and old, but it is still in use, I cannot see Microsoft dropping the ini API support as it is very much alive and in use behind the scenes for driver installation...think of inf files used to specify where the drivers go and how is it installed...it is here to stay as the manufacturers of drivers have adopted it and is de-facto standard way of driver distribution...
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
Tom.