I have a stored procedure, which writes a backup of a specific database. I call this SP in a C# / Windows Forms application asynchrounously. Here is the code snipped:
IAsyncResult result = command.BeginExecuteNonQuery();
while (!result.IsCompleted)
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000);
...
}
command.EndExecuteNonQuery(result));
After some time the program leaves the loop, because IsCompleted = true and calls EndExecuteNonQuery.
The problem now is, that the Job is still busy and EndExecuteNonQuery is blocked!
This causes a server timeout after some minutes.
It seems that the IsCompleted value is not consistent respectively what's wrong with IsCompleted?
How can I achieve that my program recognizes the "real job status"?
Make sure your stored procedure does not print anything and has no count reports (SET NOCOUNT ON). Async TDS calls call back at the very first packet sent by the server, but this packet might be a intermediate result (as in 1 row updated) and happen long, long before the actual completion. Does this suck? Yes. Can you do anything about it? No.
As a side note, is it infinitely more efficient to just pass a callback to the BeginExecute(...):
// Set form's state to 'executing',
// eg. Button.Enabled = false; label.Text = 'Executing';
command.BeginExecuteNonQuery((asyncstate)=>
{
try
{
command.EndExecuteNotQuery();
}
catch(SqlException ex)
{
...
}
// Reset the form's state to 'Ready'
Invoke (()=>
{
// eg. Button.Enabled = true; label.Text = 'Ready';
}
}
Related
Edit: Keeping the original question for continuity.
I then edited the question with replacement code for the ReadLine() method by using ReadExisting instead. It works however I still have the same freeze, where the app becomes unresponsive. Debug says it's locking (it takes a while to freeze, sometimes seconds, sometimes minutes) in the while () {} function where I wait for the complete message. More explanations below:
-- obsolete --
What is a good way to handle serialport.readtimeout exception?
try
{
serialPort1.Write(Command_);
if (!IsWriteComm_)
{
Response_ = serialPort1.ReadLine().Replace("\r", "");
}
}
catch (TimeoutException err)
{
DateTime d = DateTime.Now;
rtboxDiag.AppendText("\n" + d.ToString("HH:mm:ss") + ": ");
rtboxDiag.AppendText(err.Message);
if (!serialPort1.IsOpen)
InitConnection();
return Textbox_;
}
this bit of code is exectuted on a timer tick event.
I was having a weird "crash" of the app with an IO exception
"The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request."
no matter what I do I am not able to "recover" meaning, I am no longer able to poll data from the serial port.
I added this exception catch and it does log the exception. weirdly enough the test on !serialport.isopen is false (meaning the port is still open).
What might be a hint is: this error does STOP the timer somehow, this is not something I am doing in code. so I am suspecting something related to the timer, rather than the serialport, but I could be wrong.
Closing the port manually, and reconnecting does not fix the problem.
Disconnecting and reconnecting the USB does not fix the problem.
however, closing the app, and relaunching the app does fix the problem (without even disconnecting the MCU or power cycling the MCU/hardware).
-- /obsolete --
edit: the problem is appearing after a few seconds, sometimes minutes of flawless operations. I cannot repeat the issue using a serialport terminal polling the data the same way, at the same frequency. It seems the problem is not coming from the hardware itself.
cheers
Edit: I have yet to test the following modification, not sure if it will fix this problem (I doubt), but at least it's an attempt at not using .readline() which from what I've gathered is not good practice.
anyway here it is:
try
{
serialPort1.Write(Command_);
if (!IsWriteComm_)
{
while (!SerialRxCplt) ;
Response_ = SerialRxResponse.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "");
SerialRxCplt = false;
//Response_ = serialPort1.ReadLine().Replace("\r", "");
}
}
catch (TimeoutException err)
{
DateTime d = DateTime.Now;
rtboxDiag.AppendText("\n" + d.ToString("HH:mm:ss") + ": ");
rtboxDiag.AppendText(err.Message);
if (!serialPort1.IsOpen)
InitConnection();
return Textbox_;
}
and I have the datareceived event enabled:
private void serialPort1_DataReceived(object sender, System.IO.Ports.SerialDataReceivedEventArgs e)
{
var serialPort = (System.IO.Ports.SerialPort)sender;
string dataReceived = serialPort.ReadExisting();
ProcessSerialData(dataReceived);
}
and this is how I am processing the data, and manually "waiting" for the \n character which tells me when the data has been fully received.
private void ProcessSerialData(string data)
{
SerialRxBuffer += data;
if (SerialRxBuffer.Contains("\n"))
{
SerialRxCplt = true;
SerialRxResponse = SerialRxBuffer;
SerialRxBuffer = "";
}
else
{
SerialRxCplt = false;
}
}
any input is welcome.
I have added "stuff" for debugging inside that while loop and it does work fine for a while and then freezes, no error or exception is thrown there. For some reason I have a feeling it's not related to the serial port.
I have even added this:
try
{
serialPort1.Write(Command_);
if (!IsWriteComm_)
{
Stopwatch stopWatch = new Stopwatch();
stopWatch.Start();
while (!SerialRxCplt || Timer2StopWatchMilli > 5)
{
Timer2StopWatchMilli = stopWatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds;
ExceptionMessage = Timer2StopWatchMilli.ToString();
IsException = true;
}
stopWatch.Stop();
if (!SerialRxCplt)
return Textbox_;
Response_ = SerialRxResponse.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "");
SerialRxCplt = false;
//Response_ = serialPort1.ReadLine().Replace("\r", "");
}
}
the ExceptionMessage and IsException help me have an idea of what's happening in that loop. And in normal operations, it is what you would except, increments in the order of 0.0x milliseconds. Data is being processed correctly. When it freezes, nothing looks abnormal. I initially thought I was somehow getting "stuck" in an infinite loop but that || Timer2StopWatchMilli > 5 should get me out of it, acting as some sort of timeout.
one extra piece of info: when it freezes, the one CPU core is fully loaded. (I have a 6core CPU, and it's 16-17% in the task manager - memory usage is low < 30MB)
Any help is welcome
I fixed it by clearing RX/TX and stream buffers after each successful transaction.
I think data was being sent to the PC faster than it was able to read causing data to eventually accumulating on the Rx Buffer.
private void SerialPortClearBuffers()
{
serialPort1.DiscardOutBuffer();
serialPort1.DiscardInBuffer();
serialPort1.BaseStream.Flush();
}
I have a fairly general c# while loop question.
This code should continue to execute only after the RDP session has truly disconnected.
When the Connected property is changed to 0 it means that the RDP session connection has truly terminated. When the property is 1 it is still connected and the connection has not yet terminated.
Does anyone see anything inherently bad about this code? Is there a better way to go about it?
private void Reconnect()
{
rdp1.Disconnect(); // force the RDP session to disconnect
while (rdp1.Connected == 1) // true as long as RDP is still connected
{
// do nothing
}
rdp1.Connect(); // execute this code after while loop is broken
}
/**************************************************************/
Here's the final code I used per James' answer.
The counter suffices as the timeout for my purpose.
int i = 0;
rdp1.Disconnect();
while (rdp1.Connected == 1)
{
if (i == 1000 * 10) break;
else Thread.Sleep(100);
i++;
}
rdp1.Connect();
You should do something in the body of loop, or it will consume all your CPU (at least for one core). Usually in this type of loop, you'd sleep for a while using System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100) or something. Sleep takes the number of milliseconds to wait before checking the while condition again. Ideally, the RDP object would have a mutex or event or something you could just block on until it was disconnected, but it wouldn't surprise me if they left that out.
EDIT: As Ben pointed out, it's always a good idea to have a way out of the loop as well. Something like this (your stated answer will depend on the CPU speed, which could break in the future when CPUs are much faster):
DateTime stop = DateTime.UtcNow.AddSeconds(30);
while (rdp1.Connected)
{
if (DateTime.UtcNow > stop) throw new ApplicationException ("RDP disconnect timeout!");
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep (100);
}
Of course you will probably want to specify the timeout with a constant, a readonly TimeSpan, or a dynamically configurable TimeSpan rather than a magic number, and you should probably have a specific exception class for this case.
Set a timeout for the purpose
private void Reconnect()
{
timeOut = false;
new System.Threading.Thread(new System.Threading.ThreadStart(setTimeout)).Start();
rdp1.Disconnect();
while (rdp1.Connected == 1 && !timeOut);
rdp1.Connect();
}
bool timeOut = false;
void setTimeout()
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(7000);
timeOut = true;
}
I have two self hosted services running on the same network. The first is sampling an excel sheet (or other sources, but for the moment this is the one I'm using to test) and sending updates to a subscribed client.
The second connects as a client to instances of the first client, optionally evaluates some formula on these inputs and the broadcasts the originals or the results as updates to a subscribed client in the same manner as the first. All of this is happening over a tcp binding.
My problem is occuring when the second service attempts to subscribe to two of the first service's feeds at once, as it would do if a new calculation is using two or more for the first time. I keep getting TimeoutExceptions which appear to be occuring when the second feed is subscribed to. I put a breakpoint in the called method on the first server and stepping through it, it is able to fully complete and return true back up the call stack, which indicates that the problem might be some annoying intricacy of WCF
The first service is running on port 8081 and this is the method that gets called:
public virtual bool Subscribe(int fid)
{
try
{
if (fid > -1 && _fieldNames.LeftContains(fid))
{
String sessionID = OperationContext.Current.SessionId;
Action<Object, IUpdate> toSub = MakeSend(OperationContext.Current.GetCallbackChannel<ISubClient>(), sessionID);//Make a callback to the client's callback method to send the updates
if (!_callbackList.ContainsKey(fid))
_callbackList.Add(fid, new Dictionary<String, Action<Object, IUpdate>>());
_callbackList[fid][sessionID] = toSub;//add the callback method to the list of callback methods to call when this feed is updated
String field = GetItem(fid);//get the current stored value of that field
CheckChanged(fid, field);//add or update field, usually returns a bool if the value has changed but also updates the last value reference, used here to ensure there is a value to send
FireOne(toSub, this, MakeUpdate(fid, field));//sends an update so the subscribing service will have a first value
return true;
}
return false;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Log(e);//report any errors before returning a failure
return false;
}
}
The second service is running on port 8082 and is failing in this method:
public int AddCalculation(string name, string input)
{
try
{
Calculation calc;
try
{
calc = new Calculation(_fieldNames, input, name);//Perform slow creation before locking - better wasted one thread than several blocked ones
}
catch (FormatException e)
{
throw Fault.MakeCalculationFault(e.Message);
}
lock (_calculations)
{
int id = nextID();
foreach (int fid in calc.Dependencies)
{
if (!_calculations.ContainsKey(fid))
{
lock (_fieldTracker)
{
DataRow row = _fieldTracker.Rows.Find(fid);
int uses = (int)(row[Uses]) + 1;//update uses of that feed
try
{
if (uses == 1){//if this is the first use of this field
SubServiceClient service = _services[(int)row[ServiceID]];//get the stored connection (as client) to that service
service.Subscribe((int)row[ServiceField]);//Failing here, but only on second call and not if subscribed to each seperately
}
}
catch (TimeoutException e)
{
Log(e);
throw Fault.MakeOperationFault(FaultType.NoItemFound, "Service could not be found");//can't be caught, if this timed out then outer connection timed out
}
_fieldTracker.Rows.Find(fid)[Uses] = uses;
}
}
}
return id;
}
}
catch (FormatException f)
{
Log(f.Message);
throw Fault.MakeOperationFault(FaultType.InvalidInput, f.Message);
}
}
The ports these are on could change but are never shared. The tcp binding used is set up in code with these settings:
_tcpbinding = new NetTcpBinding();
_tcpbinding.PortSharingEnabled = false;
_tcpbinding.Security.Mode = SecurityMode.None;
This is in a common library to ensure they both have the same set up, which is also a reason why it is declared in code.
I have already tried altering the Service Throttling Behavior for more concurrent calls but that didn't work. It's commented out for now since it didn't work but for reference here's what I tried:
ServiceThrottlingBehavior stb = new ServiceThrottlingBehavior
{
MaxConcurrentCalls = 400,
MaxConcurrentSessions = 400,
MaxConcurrentInstances = 400
};
host.Description.Behaviors.RemoveAll<ServiceThrottlingBehavior>();
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(stb);
Has anyone had similar issues of methods working correctly but still timing out when sending back to the caller?
This was a difficult problem and from everything I could tell, it is an intricacy of WCF. It cannot handle one connection being reused very quickly in a loop.
It seems to lock up the socket connection, though trying to add GC.Collect() didn't free up whatever resources it was contesting.
In the end the only way I found to work was to create another connection to the same endpoint for each concurrent request and perform them on separate threads. Might not be the cleanest way but it was all that worked.
Something that might come in handy is that I used the svc trace viewer to monitor the WCF calls to try and track the problem, I found out how to use it from this article: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/17258/Debugging-WCF-Apps
I am working on a multiplayer game, using the lidgren library for networking.
I am currently having issues with a my function that reads messages sent from my server.
The function looks like this:
public class Client
{
/* code omitted */
public void ReadMessage()
{
//Read Messages
while (running)
{
Debug.Log("InREAD");
//wClient is a NetClient (lidgren library)
NetIncomingMessage msg;
while ((msg = wClient.ReadMessage()) != null)
{
switch (msg.MessageType)
{
case NetIncomingMessageType.Data:
if (msg.ReadString().Contains("Position"))
{
Debug.Log("Hej");
/*string temp = msg.ReadString();
string[] Parts = temp.Split(" ");
int x = int.Parse(Parts [1]);
int y = int.Parse(Parts [2]);
int z = int.Parse(Parts [3]);*/
//set player position to xyz values below
} else if (msg.ReadString().Contains("Instantiate"))
{
Debug.Log("Instantiate");
/* string temp = msg.ReadString();
string[] Parts = temp.Split(" ");*/
}
break;
}
}
}
}
}
as you can see, there is a while-loop that runs when the bool running is true (and yes I am setting it as true when declaring.).
Now, in my GUI class where the button for connecting is etc, I have a function call to OnApplicationQuit which looks like this:
void OnApplicationQuit()
{
client.running = false;
client.Disconnect();
Debug.Log(client.running);
Debug.Log("Bye");
}
However, the change of running doesn't reach the thread (I believe the thread is running on a cached version of the variable?). So my question is, how do i make the while-loop stop when the program is closed? (Ive tried calling on the .Abort() function on the thread in the OnApplicationQuit(), but it doesn't work either.
Also, i know its not very efficient to send strings over a network unless you need to (so no need telling me about that!)
Just guessing (since I do not know library lidgren): isn't it possible that you're thread is stuck in call wClient.ReadMessage() just because you are not receiving any message from the client? If wClient.ReadMessage() is a blocking call then the resulting behaviour would be the one you described.
Furthermore: even calling Thread.Abort() won't work because the thread is in a sleep state (since it is waiting for something coming from the network connection): the thread will be aborted as soon as your wClient.ReadMessage() returns. Looking MSDN here it tells that "If Abort is called on a managed thread while it is executing unmanaged code, a ThreadAbortException is not thrown until the thread returns to managed code" and this exactly your situation assuming that ReadMessage() at some point will perform a system call just to wait for some data coming from the underlying socket.
You must call client.Shutdown().
EDIT: Ok I had a problem with one of the string concatenation functions, has nothing to do with threads, but knowing that it couldn't be a problem with threading lead me to the answer thank you for answering.
I am making a simple tcp/ip chat program for practicing threads and tcp/ip. I was using asynchronous methods but had a problem with concurrency so I went to threads and blocking methods (not asynchronous). I have two private variables defined in the class, not static:
string amessage = string.Empty;
int MessageLength;
and a Thread
private Thread BeginRead;
Ok so I call a function called Listen ONCE when the client starts:
public virtual void Listen(int byteLength)
{
var state = new StateObject {Buffer = new byte[byteLength]};
BeginRead = new Thread(ReadThread);
BeginRead.Start(state);
}
and finally the function to receive commands and process them, I'm going to shorten it because it is really long:
private void ReadThread(object objectState)
{
var state = (StateObject)objectState;
int byteLength = state.Buffer.Length;
while (true)
{
var buffer = new byte[byteLength];
int len = MySocket.Receive(buffer);
if (len <= 0) return;
string content = Encoding.ASCII.GetString(buffer, 0, len);
amessage += cleanMessage.Substring(0, MessageLength);
if (OnRead != null)
{
var e = new CommandEventArgs(amessage);
OnRead(this, e);
}
}
}
Now, as I understand it only one thread at a time will enter BeginRead, I call Receive, it blocks until I get data, and then I process it. The problem: the variable amessage will change it's value between statements that do not touch or alter the variable at all, for example at the bottom of the function at: if (OnRead != null) "amessage" will be equal to 'asdf' and at if (OnRead != null) "amessage" will be equal to qwert. As I understand it this is indicative of another thread changing the value/running asynchronously. I only spawn one thread to do the receiving and the Receive function is blocking, how could there be two threads in this function and if there is only one thread how does amessage's value change between statements that don't affect it's value. As a side note sorry for spamming the site with these questions but I'm just getting a hang of this threading story and it's making me want to sip cyanide.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:
Here is my code that calls the Listen Method in the client:
public void ConnectClient(string ip,int port)
{
client.Connect(ip,port);
client.Listen(5);
}
and in the server:
private void Accept(IAsyncResult result)
{
var client = new AbstractClient(MySocket.EndAccept(result));
var e = new CommandEventArgs(client, null);
Clients.Add(client);
client.Listen(5);
if (OnClientAdded != null)
{
var target = (Control) OnClientAdded.Target;
if (target != null && target.InvokeRequired)
target.Invoke(OnClientAdded, this, e);
else
OnClientAdded(this, e);
}
client.OnRead += OnRead;
MySocket.BeginAccept(new AsyncCallback(Accept), null);
}
All this code is in a class called AbstractClient. The client inherits the Abstract client and when the server accepts a socket it create's it's own local AbstractClient, in this case both modules access the functions above however they are different instances and I couldn't imagine threads from different instances combining especially as no variable is static.
Well, this makes no sense the way you described it. Which probably means that what you think is going on is not what is really happening. Debugging threaded code is quite difficult, very hard to capture the state of the program at the exact moment it misbehaves.
A generic approach is to add logging to your code. Sprinkle your code with Debug.WriteLine() statements that shows the current value of the variable, along with the thread's ManagedId. You get potentially a lot of output, but somewhere you'll see it going wrong. Or you get enough insight in how thread(s) are interacting to guess the source of the problem.
Just adding the logging can in itself solve the problem because it alters the timing of code. Sucks when that happens.
I assume OnRead is firing an event dispatched on a thread pool thread. If any registered event handler is writing to amessage, its value could change any time you're in the reading loop.
Still not very clear where you are gettingthe value assigned to amessage in the loop. Should cleanmessage read content?