Cannot serialize member.... because it is an interface - c#

I have been having this problem and been pulling my hair out over it. I have the followin error:
Exception Details: System.NotSupportedException: Cannot serialize member HannaPrintsDataAccess.Customer.CustomerAddresses of type System.Collections.Generic.IList`1[[HannaPrintsDataAccess.CustomerAddress, HannaPrintsDataAccess, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null]] because it is an interface.
Source Error:
Line 196: Customer customer = OperationsManager.Instance.CustomerService.GetCustomer(7);
Line 197:
Line 198: string xml = OperationsManager.Instance.CustomerService.GetCustomerAddressesXml(CustomerAddress.FindAll());
Line 199:
Line 200: Order order = OperationsManager.Instance.OrderService.CreateOrderFromCart(xml);
Source File: c:\HostingSpaces\greetwus\galadavetiye.com\wwwroot\HannaPrints\HannaPrints\WebUI\CreateGreetingCard.aspx.cs Line: 198
Stack Trace:
[NotSupportedException: Cannot serialize member HannaPrintsDataAccess.Customer.CustomerAddresses of type System.Collections.Generic.IList`1[[HannaPrintsDataAccess.CustomerAddress, HannaPrintsDataAccess, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null]] because it is an interface.]
[InvalidOperationException: Cannot serialize member 'HannaPrintsDataAccess.Customer.CustomerAddresses' of type 'System.Collections.Generic.IList`1[[HannaPrintsDataAccess.CustomerAddress, HannaPrintsDataAccess, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null]]', see inner exception for more details.]
System.Xml.Serialization.StructModel.CheckSupportedMember(TypeDesc typeDesc, MemberInfo member, Type type) +889917
System.Xml.Serialization.StructModel.GetPropertyModel(PropertyInfo propertyInfo) +132........
I have changed all my IList's to List's to see if that would do anything, but it didnt, infact, it didnt even take a second to load after making those changes, im guessing because the error happens even before it gets to that part. I checked my remote files to see if it was uploading correctly and it was.
Here is the code:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using Castle.ActiveRecord;
namespace HannaPrintsDataAccess {
public partial class Customer {
private IList _customerAddresses;
public CustomerAddress GetPrimaryCustomerAddress()
{
foreach (CustomerAddress address in _customerAddresses)
{
if (address.IsPrimary)
return address;
}
return null;
}
[HasMany(typeof(CustomerAddress), ColumnKey = "CustomerId", Table = "Customer")]
public virtual IList<CustomerAddress> CustomerAddresses
{
get
{
return this._customerAddresses;
}
set
{
this._customerAddresses = value;
}
}
}
}
The error happens when this code is activated:
protected void orderButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Customer customer = OperationsManager.Instance.CustomerService.GetCustomer(7);
string xml = OperationsManager.Instance.CustomerService.GetCustomerAddressesXml(CustomerAddress.FindAll());
Order order = OperationsManager.Instance.OrderService.CreateOrderFromCart(xml);
OperationsManager.Instance.CartService.MoveCart("MyDesigns");
Response.Redirect("~/Customer/PayByCreditCard.aspx?orderGuid=" + order.OrderGuid);
}
The CustomerAddress class:
using System.IO;
using System.Xml.Serialization;
using Castle.ActiveRecord;
namespace HannaPrintsDataAccess
{
public partial class CustomerAddress
{
public string ToXml()
{
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(GetType());
MemoryStream memoryStream = new MemoryStream();
serializer.Serialize(memoryStream, this);
memoryStream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
return new StreamReader(memoryStream).ReadToEnd();
}
[BelongsTo("CustomerId")]
public virtual Customer Customer { get; set; }
}
}

In the code you posted, the type of CustomerAddresses is IList<CustomerAdress>. That's an interface. Like the error message says, you can't serialize an interface.

In some circumstances, one might not be interested in serializing ALL fields of an object. In that case, the C# syntax to explicitly exclude a field from the serialization of an object is the following:
XmlAttributeOverrides attrOverrides = new XmlAttributeOverrides();
XmlAttributes attrs = new XmlAttributes{ XmlIgnore = true };
attrOverrides.Add(type, member, attrs); // "type" = type of the class that contains the member
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType(), attrOverrides);
[...]
For example, to exclude, e.g. for privacy reasons, the "Password" field from the serialization of an "obj" object we should write:
attrOverrides.Add(obj.GetType(), "Password", attrs);
For fields not declared directly in the object but inherited, the "type" parameter refers to the ancestor in which the field is declared. For example, to avoid, in an object that is a descendant of System.ComponentModel.Component, the error "Cannot serialize member System.ComponentModel.Component.Site of type System.ComponentModel.ISite because it is an interface", the syntax to use is:
attrOverrides.Add(typeof(System.ComponentModel.Component), "Site", attrs);
In general, the XMLSerializer cannot serialize an object of a class that exposes interface-type fields. Nevertheless, if someone still wants to serialize (with XMLSerializer) an object of this type (e.g. for log reasons) and has no problem ignoring fields of the interface type in serialization, the following function automatically ignores fields of this type (NB: of course the final result will NOT be the serialization of the initial object, but the serialization EXCLUDING the ignored parts, which is not the same thing):
public static string Serialize<T>(T obj, bool ignoreInterfaceTypeFields = false, List<Tuple<Type, string>> ignoreTypeList = null)
{
string retValue = string.Empty;
try
{
XmlAttributeOverrides attrOverrides = new XmlAttributeOverrides();
XmlAttributes attrs = new XmlAttributes{ XmlIgnore = true };
ignoreTypeList?.ForEach(t => attrOverrides.Add(t.Item1, t.Item2, attrs)); // ignore fields in ignoreTypeList
if (ignoreInterfaceTypeFields)
{
foreach (var t in obj.GetType().GetProperties())
{
if (t.PropertyType.IsInterface)
if (attrOverrides[t.DeclaringType, t.Name] is null)
attrOverrides.Add(t.DeclaringType, t.Name, attrs); // ignore interface type fields
}
}
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType(), attrOverrides);
using (var sw = new StringWriter())
{
using (XmlTextWriter writer = new XmlTextWriter(sw) { Formatting = Formatting.Indented })
{
serializer.Serialize(writer, obj);
retValue = sw.ToString();
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex) { throw ex; }
return retValue;
}
// declared in non-generic, non-nested static classes
public static string Serialize<T>(this T obj, bool ignoreInterfaceTypeFields = false, List<Tuple<Type, string>> ignoreTypeList = null)
{
return Serialize<T>(obj, ignoreInterfaceTypeFields, ignoreTypeList);
}
This Serialize method can be called without params:
sClient = client.Serialize();
or manually excluding unwanted fields:
var ignoreTypeList = new List<Tuple<Type, string>>
{
new Tuple<Type, string>(client.GetType(), "Password"), // unwanted field (directly declared in "Client" class)
new Tuple<Type, string>(typeof(System.ComponentModel.Component), "Site") // unwanted field (declared in "System.ComponentModel.Component" ancestor class of "Client" class)
};
sClient = client.Serialize(false, ignoreTypeList);
or excluding unwanted fields AND interface type fields:
var ignoreTypeList = new List<Tuple<Type, string>>
{
new Tuple<Type, string>(client.GetType(), "Password") // unwanted field (directly declared in "Client" class)
};
sClient = client.Serialize(true, ignoreTypeList);
NOTE: with framework 4.7.2 or later (or using System.ValueTuple nuget) the syntax of Tuples can be made more readable:
public static string Serialize<T>(T obj, bool ignoreInterfaceTypeFields = false, List<(Type type, string member)> ignoreTypeList = null)
and:
var ignoreTypeList = new List<(Type, string)>
{
new (client.GetType(), "Password"),
new (typeof(System.ComponentModel.Component), "Site")
};

Following options fail with XML serializer:
public IList<CustomerAddresses> CustomerAddresses { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<CustomerAddresses> CustomerAddresses { get; set; }
Use array like below:
public CustomerAddresses[] CustomerAddresses { get; set; }
Following works but not SONAR/Quality complaint:
public List<CustomerAddresses> CustomerAddresses { get; set; }

Use [XmlIgnore] Annotation if you want to use your property without serializing it.

Not the source of your problem, but you need
using (MemoryStream memoryStream = new MemoryStream())
{
serializer.Serialize(memoryStream, this);
memoryStream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
using (StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(memoryStream))
{
return reader.ReadToEnd();
}
}

Related

Add dynamic comments to an xml file using XmlSerializer [duplicate]

I have an object Foo which I serialize to an XML stream.
public class Foo {
// The application version, NOT the file version!
public string Version {get;set;}
public string Name {get;set;}
}
Foo foo = new Foo { Version = "1.0", Name = "Bar" };
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(foo.GetType());
This works fast, easy and does everything currently required.
The problem I'm having is that I need to maintain a separate documentation file with some minor remarks. As in the above example, Name is obvious, but Version is the application version and not the data file version as one could expect in this case. And I have many more similar little things I want to clarify with a comment.
I know I can do this if I manually create my XML file using the WriteComment() function, but is there a possible attribute or alternative syntax I can implement so that I can keep using the serializer functionality?
This is possible using the default infrastructure by making use of properties that return an object of type XmlComment and marking those properties with [XmlAnyElement("SomeUniquePropertyName")].
I.e. if you add a property to Foo like this:
public class Foo
{
[XmlAnyElement("VersionComment")]
public XmlComment VersionComment { get { return new XmlDocument().CreateComment("The application version, NOT the file version!"); } set { } }
public string Version { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
The following XML will be generated:
<Foo>
<!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
<Version>1.0</Version>
<Name>Bar</Name>
</Foo>
However, the question is asking for more than this, namely some way to look up the comment in a documentation system. The following accomplishes this by using extension methods to look up the documentation based on the reflected comment property name:
public class Foo
{
[XmlAnyElement("VersionXmlComment")]
public XmlComment VersionXmlComment { get { return GetType().GetXmlComment(); } set { } }
[XmlComment("The application version, NOT the file version!")]
public string Version { get; set; }
[XmlAnyElement("NameXmlComment")]
public XmlComment NameXmlComment { get { return GetType().GetXmlComment(); } set { } }
[XmlComment("The application name, NOT the file name!")]
public string Name { get; set; }
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
public XmlCommentAttribute(string value)
{
this.Value = value;
}
public string Value { get; set; }
}
public static class XmlCommentExtensions
{
const string XmlCommentPropertyPostfix = "XmlComment";
static XmlCommentAttribute GetXmlCommentAttribute(this Type type, string memberName)
{
var member = type.GetProperty(memberName);
if (member == null)
return null;
var attr = member.GetCustomAttribute<XmlCommentAttribute>();
return attr;
}
public static XmlComment GetXmlComment(this Type type, [CallerMemberName] string memberName = "")
{
var attr = GetXmlCommentAttribute(type, memberName);
if (attr == null)
{
if (memberName.EndsWith(XmlCommentPropertyPostfix))
attr = GetXmlCommentAttribute(type, memberName.Substring(0, memberName.Length - XmlCommentPropertyPostfix.Length));
}
if (attr == null || string.IsNullOrEmpty(attr.Value))
return null;
return new XmlDocument().CreateComment(attr.Value);
}
}
For which the following XML is generated:
<Foo>
<!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
<Version>1.0</Version>
<!--The application name, NOT the file name!-->
<Name>Bar</Name>
</Foo>
Notes:
The extension method XmlCommentExtensions.GetXmlCommentAttribute(this Type type, string memberName) assumes that the comment property will be named xxxXmlComment where xxx is the "real" property. If so, it can automatically determine the real property name by marking the incoming memberName attribute with CallerMemberNameAttribute. This can be overridden manually by passing in the real name.
Once the type and member name are known, the extension method looks up the relevant comment by searching for an [XmlComment] attribute applied to the property. This could be replaced with a cached lookup into a separate documentation file.
While it is still necessary to add the xxxXmlComment properties for each property that might be commented, this is likely to be less burdensome than implementing IXmlSerializable directly which is quite tricky, can lead to bugs in deserialization, and can require nested serialization of complex child properties.
To ensure that each comment precedes its associated element, see Controlling order of serialization in C#.
For XmlSerializer to serialize a property it must have both a getter and setter. Thus I gave the comment properties setters that do nothing.
Working .Net fiddle.
Isn't possible using default infrastructure. You need to implement IXmlSerializable for your purposes.
Very simple implementation:
public class Foo : IXmlSerializable
{
[XmlComment(Value = "The application version, NOT the file version!")]
public string Version { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
{
var properties = GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
if (propertyInfo.IsDefined(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false))
{
writer.WriteComment(
propertyInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false)
.Cast<XmlCommentAttribute>().Single().Value);
}
writer.WriteElementString(propertyInfo.Name, propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).ToString());
}
}
public XmlSchema GetSchema()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
Output:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<Foo>
<!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
<Version>1.2</Version>
<Name>A</Name>
</Foo>
Another way, maybe preferable: serialize with default serializer, then perform post-processing, i.e. update XML, e.g. using XDocument or XmlDocument.
Add comment at the end of xml after serialization (magic is to flush xmlWriter).
byte[] buffer;
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(result.GetType());
var settings = new XmlWriterSettings() { Encoding = Encoding.UTF8 };
using (MemoryStream memoryStream = new MemoryStream())
{
using (XmlWriter xmlWriter = XmlWriter.Create(memoryStream, settings))
{
serializer.Serialize(xmlWriter, result);
xmlWriter.WriteComment("test");
xmlWriter.Flush();
buffer = memoryStream.ToArray();
}
}
Probably late to the party but I had problems when I was trying to deserialize using Kirill Polishchuk solution. Finally I decided to edit the XML after serializing it and the solution looks like:
public static void WriteXml(object objectToSerialize, string path)
{
try
{
using (var w = new XmlTextWriter(path, null))
{
w.Formatting = Formatting.Indented;
var serializer = new XmlSerializer(objectToSerialize.GetType());
serializer.Serialize(w, objectToSerialize);
}
WriteComments(objectToSerialize, path);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new Exception($"Could not save xml to path {path}. Details: {e}");
}
}
public static T ReadXml<T>(string path) where T:class, new()
{
if (!File.Exists(path))
return null;
try
{
using (TextReader r = new StreamReader(path))
{
var deserializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
var structure = (T)deserializer.Deserialize(r);
return structure;
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new Exception($"Could not open and read file from path {path}. Details: {e}");
}
}
private static void WriteComments(object objectToSerialize, string path)
{
try
{
var propertyComments = GetPropertiesAndComments(objectToSerialize);
if (!propertyComments.Any()) return;
var doc = new XmlDocument();
doc.Load(path);
var parent = doc.SelectSingleNode(objectToSerialize.GetType().Name);
if (parent == null) return;
var childNodes = parent.ChildNodes.Cast<XmlNode>().Where(n => propertyComments.ContainsKey(n.Name));
foreach (var child in childNodes)
{
parent.InsertBefore(doc.CreateComment(propertyComments[child.Name]), child);
}
doc.Save(path);
}
catch (Exception)
{
// ignored
}
}
private static Dictionary<string, string> GetPropertiesAndComments(object objectToSerialize)
{
var propertyComments = objectToSerialize.GetType().GetProperties()
.Where(p => p.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false).Any())
.Select(v => new
{
v.Name,
((XmlCommentAttribute) v.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false)[0]).Value
})
.ToDictionary(t => t.Name, t => t.Value);
return propertyComments;
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
Proposed solution by user dbc looks fine, however it seems to need more manual work to create such comments than using an XmlWriter that knows how to insert comments based on XmlComment attributes.
See https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=xmlcomment - it seems you can pass such a writer to XmlSerializer and thus not have to implement your own serialization which could be tricky.
I did myself end up using dbc's solution though, nice and clean with no extra code. See https://dotnetfiddle.net/Bvbi0N. Make sure you provide a "set" accessor for the comment element (the XmlAnyElement). It doesn't need to have a name btw.
Update: better pass a unique name always, aka use [XmlAnyElement("someCommentElement")] instead of [XmlAnyElement]. Was using the same class with WCF and it was choking upon those XmlAnyElements that didn't have a name provided, even though I had [XmlIgnore, SoapIgnore, IgnoreDataMember] at all of them.
for nested xml, I changed the method this way(for me i was having simple property as string(its possible to make it more complex in the logic)
public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
{
var properties = GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
if (propertyInfo.IsDefined(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false))
{
writer.WriteComment(
propertyInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false)
.Cast<XmlCommentAttribute>().Single().Value);
}
if (propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).GetType().ToString() != "System.String")
{
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).GetType());
xmlSerializer.Serialize(writer, propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null));
}
else
{
writer.WriteElementString(propertyInfo.Name, propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).ToString());
}
}
}

Xml being deserialized into base class instead of derived classes

I know this is a popular topic and I have researched extensively without finding an answer to my problem.
I have a base class IntroductionAction and 2 derived classes IntroductionActionComplex and IntroductionActionSimple. I have a list of IntroductionAction objects to which I have added objects of both of the derived types. My classes are as follows:
[XmlInclude(typeof(IntroductionActionComplex))]
[XmlInclude(typeof(IntroductionActionSimple))]
public class IntroductionAction
{
public IntroductionAction() { }
}
public class IntroductionActionComplex : IntroductionAction
{
[XmlIgnore]
public string name { get; set; }
[XmlElement(ElementName = "QuestionString")]
public string question { get; set; }
[XmlElement(ElementName = "AnswerString")]
public List<string> answerStrings { get; set; }
public IntroductionActionComplex()
{
name = string.Empty;
question = null;
answerStrings = new List<string>();
}
}
public class IntroductionActionSimple : IntroductionAction
{
[XmlIgnore]
public string name { get; set; }
[XmlText]
public string Value { get; set; }
public IntroductionActionSimple()
{
Value = string.Empty;
}
}
I then create the List as follows
[XmlElement("IntroductionAction")]
public List<IntroductionAction> introductionActions { get; set; }
I am using XmlSerializer and everything serializes correctly. This is the resulting XML of the list containing one of each of the derived classes which is correct.
<IntroductionAction>
<QuestionString>
test
</QuestionString>
<AnswerString>
test
</AnswerString>
<AnswerString>
test
</AnswerString>
</IntroductionAction>
<IntroductionAction>
test
</IntroductionAction>
This XML file is going onto a device which doesn't read it as XML but just searches for the tags and does whatever work it needs to do and because of that the file can't contain any XSI or XSD tags, indentation, etc that is usually associated with proper XML.
My deserialization code is straight forward:
public static T Deserialize_xml_Config<T>(string file1, T obj)
{
XmlSerializer deserializer = new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType());
using (TextReader reader = new StreamReader(file1))
{
return (T)deserializer.Deserialize(reader);
}
}
Finally to my problem. When I deserialize, it is being deserialized to the base class IntroductionAction and not to the derived classes.
These IntroductionAction classes are just part of a much larger object that I am serializing/deserializing. I have tried making the base class abstract since it contains no functionality but I get an error on deserialization saying
The specified type is abstract: name='IntroductionAction'
Despite my XmlIncludes it seems unable to find the derived classes.
I have tried adding the types to the serializer but that didn't work.
Any help is much appreciated.
Edit:
This is what I mean by adding the types to the serializer
XmlSerializer deserializer = new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType(), new Type [] { typeof(IntroductionActionComplex), typeof(IntroductionActionSimple) });
using (TextReader reader = new StreamReader(file1))
{
return (T)deserializer.Deserialize(reader);
}
Also my attempt at using XmlAttributeOverrides:
XmlAttributeOverrides attrOverrides = new XmlAttributeOverrides();
var attrs = new XmlAttributes();
XmlElementAttribute attr = new XmlElementAttribute();
attr.ElementName = "IntroductionAction";
attr.Type = typeof(IntroductionActionComplex);
attrs.XmlElements.Add(attr);
attr.ElementName = "IntroductionAction";
attr.Type = typeof(IntroductionActionSimple);
attrs.XmlElements.Add(attr);
attrOverrides.Add(typeof(IntroductionAction), "IntroductionAction", attrs);
XmlSerializer deserializer = new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType(), attrOverrides);
using (TextReader reader = new StreamReader(file1))
{
return (T)deserializer.Deserialize(reader);
}
I think you are pretty close. Below is the full example of saving and loading the XML file based on derived class types. This will save the nodes as the derived type itself, so loading back in will keep the desired type, rather than convert back to the base type. You'll probably need to add exception handling, this was just a quick solution. I did not change your base IntroductionAction or the derived IntroductionActionComplex / IntroductionActionSimple classes.
public class RootNode
{
[XmlElement("IntroductionAction")]
public List<IntroductionAction> introductionActions { get; set; }
public RootNode()
{
introductionActions = new List<IntroductionAction>();
}
private static XmlAttributeOverrides GetXmlAttributeOverrides()
{
XmlAttributeOverrides xml_attr_overrides = new XmlAttributeOverrides();
XmlAttributes xml_attrs = new XmlAttributes();
xml_attrs.XmlElements.Add(new XmlElementAttribute(typeof(IntroductionActionComplex)));
xml_attrs.XmlElements.Add(new XmlElementAttribute(typeof(IntroductionActionSimple)));
xml_attr_overrides.Add(typeof(RootNode), "introductionActions", xml_attrs);
return xml_attr_overrides;
}
// Add exception handling
public static void SaveToFile(RootNode rootNode, string fileName)
{
using (MemoryStream mem_stream = new MemoryStream())
{
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(rootNode.GetType(), RootNode.GetXmlAttributeOverrides());
serializer.Serialize(mem_stream, rootNode);
using (BinaryWriter output = new BinaryWriter(new FileStream(fileName, FileMode.Create)))
{
output.Write(mem_stream.ToArray());
}
}
}
// Add exception handling
public static RootNode LoadFromFile(string fileName)
{
if (File.Exists(fileName))
{
using (FileStream file = new FileStream(fileName, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite))
{
using (TextReader reader = new StreamReader(file))
{
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(RootNode), RootNode.GetXmlAttributeOverrides());
return (RootNode)serializer.Deserialize(reader);
}
}
}
return null;
}
}
Test program:
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
RootNode obj = new RootNode();
obj.introductionActions.Add(new IntroductionActionComplex() { question = "qTest", answerStrings = { "aTest1", "aTest2" }, name = "aName1" });
obj.introductionActions.Add(new IntroductionActionSimple() { name = "aName2", Value = "aValue" });
RootNode.SaveToFile(obj, "Test.xml");
RootNode obj2 = RootNode.LoadFromFile("Test.xml");
}
}

Deserialize property with a different name?

I have an interface with exposes a property called Pages:
public interface INameSet
{
IQueryable<string> Names { get; }
}
I have this class which implements the interface and must also be parsed from a JSON object:
[DataContract(Name = "surveyPageSet")]
public class SurveyPage : INameSet
{
[DataMember(Name = "names")]
public List<string> SurveyNames { get; set; }
public IQueryable<string> Names
{
get
{
//Returns SurveyNames after some filtration logic
}
}
}
My problem is that when I pass in this object:
{
"names": ["testname"]
}
The JSON interpreter is trying to deserialize it to match the Names property instead of the SurveyNames property. I know this happens because when removing the implementation of the interface and changing SurveyNames to Names it populates the property fine. Is there any way to get it to serialize to the correct property or do I need to create a translator class that will generate the proper concretion of the INameSet interface?
EDIT: This is with the built-in serializer. If there is a solution with Newtonsoft/JSON.NET that would be fine with me.
JavaScriptSerializer doesn't allow for remapping of names out of the box, so don't use it.
Instead, use Json.NET or DataContractJsonSerializer. In fact, both should already work given the data contract attributes you have applied.
For instance, using Json.NET, if I do:
var page1 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<SurveyPage>(json);
Debug.Assert(page1.SurveyNames != null && page1.SurveyNames.SequenceEqual(new string [] { "testname" }));
Then there is no assert. Similarly there is no assert if I do:
var page2 = DataContractJsonSerializerHelper.GetObject<SurveyPage>(json);
Debug.Assert(page2.SurveyNames != null && page2.SurveyNames.SequenceEqual(new string[] { "testname" }));
using the helper class:
public static class DataContractJsonSerializerHelper
{
private static MemoryStream GenerateStreamFromString(string value)
{
return new MemoryStream(Encoding.Unicode.GetBytes(value ?? ""));
}
public static string GetJson<T>(T obj, DataContractJsonSerializer serializer)
{
using (var memory = new MemoryStream())
{
serializer.WriteObject(memory, obj);
memory.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
using (var reader = new StreamReader(memory))
{
return reader.ReadToEnd();
}
}
}
public static string GetJson<T>(T obj) where T : class
{
DataContractJsonSerializer serializer = new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(T));
return GetJson(obj, serializer);
}
public static T GetObject<T>(string json) where T : class
{
DataContractJsonSerializer serializer = new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(T));
return GetObject<T>(json, serializer);
}
public static T GetObject<T>(string json, DataContractJsonSerializer serializer)
{
T obj = default(T);
using (var stream = GenerateStreamFromString(json))
{
obj = (T)serializer.ReadObject(stream);
}
return obj;
}
}
Update
If you really want to continue to use JavaScriptConverter, you can write your own JavaScriptConverter and deserialize each field manually. But it's a bother and I wouldn't recommend it.

How to serialize/de-serialize a Dictionary<string, object> into XML

I am trying to write a save routine for my application where several parts of the application add items to a Dictionary and then the save function writes them to a XML file. The open routine needs to read those files and re-populate the Dictionary and I can then place those objects back into my application. I am struggling with the de-serialization of the routine I have now. My save routine is as follows
XmlDocument xmlDoc = new XmlDocument();
// Write down the XML declaration
XmlDeclaration xmlDeclaration = xmlDoc.CreateXmlDeclaration("1.0", "utf-8", null);
// Create the root element
XmlElement rootNode = xmlDoc.CreateElement("TireStudy");
xmlDoc.InsertBefore(xmlDeclaration, xmlDoc.DocumentElement);
xmlDoc.AppendChild(rootNode);
foreach (var saveItem in _SaveItems)
{
XPathNavigator nav = rootNode.CreateNavigator();
using (var writer = nav.AppendChild())
{
var serializer = new XmlSerializer(saveItem.Value.GetType());
writer.WriteWhitespace("");
serializer.Serialize(writer, saveItem.Value);
writer.Close();
}
}
xmlDoc.Save(fileName);
This routine works to create a file, but I would like the key value of the dictionary to be saved in the file as well and I am not sure how to de-serialize the file this creates because I do not know the types of the objects before I read them.
Part 2 (I hate adding new parts to a question, but I don't see a better way to address the problems going forward)
I now have the following code,
var knownTypes = new List<Type>
{
typeof(ObservableCollection<string>),
typeof(ObservableCollection<Segments>),
typeof(Segments),
typeof(List<string>)
};
var serialized = _SaveItems.Serialize(knownTypes);
but I get the following exception
Type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.String]' cannot be added to list of known types since another type 'System.Collections.ObjectModel.ObservableCollection`1[System.String]' with the same data contract name 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays:ArrayOfstring' is already present. If there are different collections of a particular type - for example, List<Test> and Test[], they cannot both be added as known types. Consider specifying only one of these types for addition to the known types list.
If I delete either the typeof(ObservableCollection) or the typeof(List) it exceptions complaining it needs the one I deleted.
You could use DataContractSerializer as explained in this post but you may have to pass the known types as a parameter to the serializer to support nested object typed classes:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.IO;
using System.Xml;
public static class SerializationExtensions
{
public static string Serialize<T>(this T obj, IEnumerable<Type> knownTypes)
{
var serializer = new DataContractSerializer(obj.GetType(), knownTypes);
using (var writer = new StringWriter())
using (var stm = new XmlTextWriter(writer))
{
serializer.WriteObject(stm, obj);
return writer.ToString();
}
}
public static T Deserialize<T>(this string serialized, IEnumerable<Type> knownTypes)
{
var serializer = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T), knownTypes);
using (var reader = new StringReader(serialized))
using (var stm = new XmlTextReader(reader))
{
return (T)serializer.ReadObject(stm);
}
}
}
public class Address
{
public string Country { get; set; }
public string City { get; set; }
}
public class CodedAddress
{
public int CountryCode { get; set; }
public int CityCode { get; set; }
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var persons1 = new Dictionary<string, Address>();
persons1.Add("John Smith", new Address { Country = "US", City = "New York" });
persons1.Add("Jean Martin", new Address { Country = "France", City = "Paris" });
// no need to provide known types to the serializer
var serializedPersons1 = persons1.Serialize(null);
var deserializedPersons1 = serializedPersons1.Deserialize<Dictionary<string, Address>>(null);
var persons2 = new Dictionary<string, object>();
persons2.Add("John Smith", new Address { Country = "US", City = "New York" });
persons2.Add("Jean Martin", new CodedAddress { CountryCode = 33, CityCode = 75 });
// must provide known types to the serializer
var knownTypes = new List<Type> { typeof(Address), typeof(CodedAddress) };
var serializedPersons2 = persons2.Serialize(knownTypes);
var deserializedPersons2 = serializedPersons2.Deserialize<Dictionary<string, object>>(knownTypes);
}
}

How to write a comment to an XML file when using the XmlSerializer?

I have an object Foo which I serialize to an XML stream.
public class Foo {
// The application version, NOT the file version!
public string Version {get;set;}
public string Name {get;set;}
}
Foo foo = new Foo { Version = "1.0", Name = "Bar" };
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(foo.GetType());
This works fast, easy and does everything currently required.
The problem I'm having is that I need to maintain a separate documentation file with some minor remarks. As in the above example, Name is obvious, but Version is the application version and not the data file version as one could expect in this case. And I have many more similar little things I want to clarify with a comment.
I know I can do this if I manually create my XML file using the WriteComment() function, but is there a possible attribute or alternative syntax I can implement so that I can keep using the serializer functionality?
This is possible using the default infrastructure by making use of properties that return an object of type XmlComment and marking those properties with [XmlAnyElement("SomeUniquePropertyName")].
I.e. if you add a property to Foo like this:
public class Foo
{
[XmlAnyElement("VersionComment")]
public XmlComment VersionComment { get { return new XmlDocument().CreateComment("The application version, NOT the file version!"); } set { } }
public string Version { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
The following XML will be generated:
<Foo>
<!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
<Version>1.0</Version>
<Name>Bar</Name>
</Foo>
However, the question is asking for more than this, namely some way to look up the comment in a documentation system. The following accomplishes this by using extension methods to look up the documentation based on the reflected comment property name:
public class Foo
{
[XmlAnyElement("VersionXmlComment")]
public XmlComment VersionXmlComment { get { return GetType().GetXmlComment(); } set { } }
[XmlComment("The application version, NOT the file version!")]
public string Version { get; set; }
[XmlAnyElement("NameXmlComment")]
public XmlComment NameXmlComment { get { return GetType().GetXmlComment(); } set { } }
[XmlComment("The application name, NOT the file name!")]
public string Name { get; set; }
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
public XmlCommentAttribute(string value)
{
this.Value = value;
}
public string Value { get; set; }
}
public static class XmlCommentExtensions
{
const string XmlCommentPropertyPostfix = "XmlComment";
static XmlCommentAttribute GetXmlCommentAttribute(this Type type, string memberName)
{
var member = type.GetProperty(memberName);
if (member == null)
return null;
var attr = member.GetCustomAttribute<XmlCommentAttribute>();
return attr;
}
public static XmlComment GetXmlComment(this Type type, [CallerMemberName] string memberName = "")
{
var attr = GetXmlCommentAttribute(type, memberName);
if (attr == null)
{
if (memberName.EndsWith(XmlCommentPropertyPostfix))
attr = GetXmlCommentAttribute(type, memberName.Substring(0, memberName.Length - XmlCommentPropertyPostfix.Length));
}
if (attr == null || string.IsNullOrEmpty(attr.Value))
return null;
return new XmlDocument().CreateComment(attr.Value);
}
}
For which the following XML is generated:
<Foo>
<!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
<Version>1.0</Version>
<!--The application name, NOT the file name!-->
<Name>Bar</Name>
</Foo>
Notes:
The extension method XmlCommentExtensions.GetXmlCommentAttribute(this Type type, string memberName) assumes that the comment property will be named xxxXmlComment where xxx is the "real" property. If so, it can automatically determine the real property name by marking the incoming memberName attribute with CallerMemberNameAttribute. This can be overridden manually by passing in the real name.
Once the type and member name are known, the extension method looks up the relevant comment by searching for an [XmlComment] attribute applied to the property. This could be replaced with a cached lookup into a separate documentation file.
While it is still necessary to add the xxxXmlComment properties for each property that might be commented, this is likely to be less burdensome than implementing IXmlSerializable directly which is quite tricky, can lead to bugs in deserialization, and can require nested serialization of complex child properties.
To ensure that each comment precedes its associated element, see Controlling order of serialization in C#.
For XmlSerializer to serialize a property it must have both a getter and setter. Thus I gave the comment properties setters that do nothing.
Working .Net fiddle.
Isn't possible using default infrastructure. You need to implement IXmlSerializable for your purposes.
Very simple implementation:
public class Foo : IXmlSerializable
{
[XmlComment(Value = "The application version, NOT the file version!")]
public string Version { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
{
var properties = GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
if (propertyInfo.IsDefined(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false))
{
writer.WriteComment(
propertyInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false)
.Cast<XmlCommentAttribute>().Single().Value);
}
writer.WriteElementString(propertyInfo.Name, propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).ToString());
}
}
public XmlSchema GetSchema()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
Output:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<Foo>
<!--The application version, NOT the file version!-->
<Version>1.2</Version>
<Name>A</Name>
</Foo>
Another way, maybe preferable: serialize with default serializer, then perform post-processing, i.e. update XML, e.g. using XDocument or XmlDocument.
Add comment at the end of xml after serialization (magic is to flush xmlWriter).
byte[] buffer;
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(result.GetType());
var settings = new XmlWriterSettings() { Encoding = Encoding.UTF8 };
using (MemoryStream memoryStream = new MemoryStream())
{
using (XmlWriter xmlWriter = XmlWriter.Create(memoryStream, settings))
{
serializer.Serialize(xmlWriter, result);
xmlWriter.WriteComment("test");
xmlWriter.Flush();
buffer = memoryStream.ToArray();
}
}
Probably late to the party but I had problems when I was trying to deserialize using Kirill Polishchuk solution. Finally I decided to edit the XML after serializing it and the solution looks like:
public static void WriteXml(object objectToSerialize, string path)
{
try
{
using (var w = new XmlTextWriter(path, null))
{
w.Formatting = Formatting.Indented;
var serializer = new XmlSerializer(objectToSerialize.GetType());
serializer.Serialize(w, objectToSerialize);
}
WriteComments(objectToSerialize, path);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new Exception($"Could not save xml to path {path}. Details: {e}");
}
}
public static T ReadXml<T>(string path) where T:class, new()
{
if (!File.Exists(path))
return null;
try
{
using (TextReader r = new StreamReader(path))
{
var deserializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
var structure = (T)deserializer.Deserialize(r);
return structure;
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new Exception($"Could not open and read file from path {path}. Details: {e}");
}
}
private static void WriteComments(object objectToSerialize, string path)
{
try
{
var propertyComments = GetPropertiesAndComments(objectToSerialize);
if (!propertyComments.Any()) return;
var doc = new XmlDocument();
doc.Load(path);
var parent = doc.SelectSingleNode(objectToSerialize.GetType().Name);
if (parent == null) return;
var childNodes = parent.ChildNodes.Cast<XmlNode>().Where(n => propertyComments.ContainsKey(n.Name));
foreach (var child in childNodes)
{
parent.InsertBefore(doc.CreateComment(propertyComments[child.Name]), child);
}
doc.Save(path);
}
catch (Exception)
{
// ignored
}
}
private static Dictionary<string, string> GetPropertiesAndComments(object objectToSerialize)
{
var propertyComments = objectToSerialize.GetType().GetProperties()
.Where(p => p.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false).Any())
.Select(v => new
{
v.Name,
((XmlCommentAttribute) v.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false)[0]).Value
})
.ToDictionary(t => t.Name, t => t.Value);
return propertyComments;
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property)]
public class XmlCommentAttribute : Attribute
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
Proposed solution by user dbc looks fine, however it seems to need more manual work to create such comments than using an XmlWriter that knows how to insert comments based on XmlComment attributes.
See https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=xmlcomment - it seems you can pass such a writer to XmlSerializer and thus not have to implement your own serialization which could be tricky.
I did myself end up using dbc's solution though, nice and clean with no extra code. See https://dotnetfiddle.net/Bvbi0N. Make sure you provide a "set" accessor for the comment element (the XmlAnyElement). It doesn't need to have a name btw.
Update: better pass a unique name always, aka use [XmlAnyElement("someCommentElement")] instead of [XmlAnyElement]. Was using the same class with WCF and it was choking upon those XmlAnyElements that didn't have a name provided, even though I had [XmlIgnore, SoapIgnore, IgnoreDataMember] at all of them.
for nested xml, I changed the method this way(for me i was having simple property as string(its possible to make it more complex in the logic)
public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
{
var properties = GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
if (propertyInfo.IsDefined(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false))
{
writer.WriteComment(
propertyInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(XmlCommentAttribute), false)
.Cast<XmlCommentAttribute>().Single().Value);
}
if (propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).GetType().ToString() != "System.String")
{
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).GetType());
xmlSerializer.Serialize(writer, propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null));
}
else
{
writer.WriteElementString(propertyInfo.Name, propertyInfo.GetValue(this, null).ToString());
}
}
}

Categories