So I imported this aspx page done by a former dev who worked for the company I'm in now. I found that the aspx page left by him doesn't have a codebehind file so I assumed this wasn't the source code. I can't find the source so I added a code file and try to work it out on my own. But my main concern is this: clients can't access the code behind, right? Is a manually added code file subject to the same protection?
The codebehind file is there as a place to put your server side code. However it's technically not necessary to have one since you can put the code in the aspx file using c# script tags. It's however recommended to put it in the codebehind file for better separation between markup and code.
It does not matter if you add it yourself or if Visual Studio adds it for you. It does not change anything in terms of access. In all events it executes on the server.
If your server is properly configured to run ASP.NET applications - which I believe it is - then IIS will not serve .cs files to a client. These will normally be accessible only through FTP. Try it yourself, by browsing to any .cs file in your application :)
Also notice that what you get when you browse to an .aspx file is not the very same code you'd see in Visual Studio, but the result of that being processed. IIS will serve the resulting HTML. So even if you have server side code in the ASPX file, that won't be visible to an end user browsing through your application.
Sounds like a web application project; in this case, the code is in the code-behind file as #TGH mentioned, and the code would be in the DLL compiled for the web application. Therefore, the only way to get that code is use a tool like Telerik JustDecompile, and decompile that DLL to grab the source code for EVERY file in the project. It would be much better to have the source, as these decompile tools do not include everything in that code-behind file.
I have developed a application in ASP.NET using c#. The entire application working fine but the problem is when I open the application for first time it running very slow. i.e. its taking so much time to load a page like home page or any other page. But when I reopen that page then that page opens quickly as I expect. Even whenever application getting session expired and relogin into application its taking so much time again to load all the pages for the first time, where from 2nd time to opens that pages its not happening. So can anybody tell me what is the problem occuring here.
The application is compiled on the first request.
Read this article by Microsoft.
Because ASP.NET compiles your Web site on first user request, you can
simply copy your application's source code to the production Web
server. However, ASP.NET also provides precompilation options that
allow you to compile your Web site before it has been deployed, or to
compile it after it has been deployed but before a user requests it.
Precompilation has several advantages. It can improve the performance
of your Web site on first request because there will be no lag time
while ASP.NET compiles the site. Precompiling can also help you find
errors that might otherwise be found only when a user requests a page.
Finally, if you precompile the Web site before you deploy it, you can
deploy the assemblies instead of the source code.
You can precompile a Web site using the ASP.NET compiler tool (ASPNET_Compiler.exe). The tool that provides the following precompilation options:
In-place compilation This option performs the same compilation that occurs during dynamic compilation. Use this option to compile a Web site that has already been deployed to a production server.
Non-updateable full precompilation Use this to compile an application and then copy the compiled output to the production server. All application code, markup, and UI code is compiled into assemblies. Placeholder files such as .aspx pages still exist so that you can perform file-specific tasks such as configure permissions, but the files contain no updateable code. In order to update any page or any code you must precompile the Web site again and deploy it again.
Updateable precompilation This is similar to non-updateable full precompilation, except that UI elements such as .aspx pages and .ascx controls retain all their markup, UI code, and inline code, if any. You can update code in the file after it has been deployed; ASP.NET will detect changes to the file and recompile it. Note that code in a code-behind file (.vb or .cs file) built into assemblies during precompilation, and you therefore cannot change it without going through the precompilation and deployment steps again.
However, you mentioned that it's also slow if the session expired. Maybe you are loading too much into memory on session start. It's difficult to make a diagnosis without more informations.
Check your site in firebug in .net tab there you will find which part of your page take much time to load,
there might be some exceptions or some code errors in client side language.
Try to use less sessions
and debug your code to clarify no extra looping of code
(sorry for bad English but hopefully you have got my point)
The aspx page that I need to add code to has an aspx.cs file which was written by a company that has this aspx.cs file on their system (per contract) and I cannot modify/access.
Example: MyFile.aspx and no access file MyFile.aspx.cs
I need to use a label.text from the page in the control pages and also depending on IF ELSEIF statements it will call which of the different controls that it needs to execute.
What is a good way to do this when one does not have access to the aspx.cs file?
I have spent a couple days trying to find/figure out answers to this problem and keep running into problems.
You do have a strange situation here ;)
Here's one wild idea. You can change the Inherits attribute at the top of the .aspx file to substitue your own class instead.
Of course that means you have to rewrite all the logic behind the page -- or you can try to have your own class inherit the original one, but depending on visibility of original code this may not work.
Another option could be to use a decompiler to re-create all the source code of the web project from the compiled dll. But you may not be legally allowed to do that -- although I would point out that if you don't have the rights to use the code, you probably don't have the rights to use the .aspx either, even if you have access to them.
I have a very wired error, one of my custom controls seems that is create two compiled files, and when I try to load it dynamically with LoadControl() is just fail because can not cast the one to the other - even if they are exactly the same. I write the message to see that all is the same, is only change the compiled dll.
System.Web.HttpUnhandledException (0x80004005):
Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpUnhandledException' was thrown. --->
System.InvalidCastException:
[A]ASP.Modules_OneProduct_MedioumImage cannot be cast to
[B]ASP.Modules_OneProduct_MedioumImage.
Type A originates from 'App_Web_kg4bazz1, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'
in the context 'Default'
at location 'C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\80ed7513\10eb08d9\App_Web_kg4bazz1.dll'.
Type B originates from 'App_Web_oneproduct_mediumimage.ascx.d1003923.4xoxco7b, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'
in the context 'Default'
at location 'C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files\root\80ed7513\10eb08d9\App_Web_oneproduct_mediumimage.ascx.d1003923.4xoxco7b.dll'.
The code
This is the code as it is right now after I have follow exactly what is written on MSDN:
foreach (int OneProductID in TheProductIdArrays)
{
// here is the throw.
ASP.Modules_OneProduct_MedioumImage OneProduct =
(ASP.Modules_OneProduct_MedioumImage)LoadControl(#"~/mod/OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx");
// do some work with
//OneProduct
}
Previously I have Load the control without the ASP. but after this bug appears and looking for solution, I strictly follow what is on MSDN. The bug is still here no matter what I do.
I have also try both of this methods, each one alone, and together (again fail)
<%# Register src="~/mod/OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx" tagname="OneProduct_MediumImage" tagprefix="uc1" %>
<%# Reference Control="~/mod/OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx" %>
Config
My web.config, I have try with maxBatchSize 20, 100, 1000, also with optimizeCompilations true or false, but the bug is appears again.
<compilation debug="false" defaultLanguage="C#" batch="true"
maxBatchSize="800" batchTimeout="10800" optimizeCompilations="false"
targetFramework="4.0">
Now some details about
The error is random, in some compile appears, in some other not.
The project is a big one, the pages are live with a lot of people in every minute that ask to see something, but also appears when there is no one inside.
Is run on 64bit dot.net 4, Intergrated
Run as web garden but also tested and one pool alone (and get the same issue)
The session is off on the full project.
The pages are run from 2007 but this issue is appears the last month, unfortunately I can not find where and how is started, or what is trigger it because I late some days to see it.
Appears only one one custom control loads, the one that have heavy call.
I have change 4 times the code making small changes, or big changes and still there.
I have try with optimizeCompilations true and false and the same issue.
I have try also by stopping the web, delete all temporary files, reopening, and there was again.
I have try to place a mutex on global.asax when the application starts to lock only one compile at the time, but this fails also.
From the moment that works, then all is good, but if not works is not auto corrected.
The code that I load this custom control is exist and called in more than one places on the code, on different pages.
Other custom controls, with similar load did not have any problems.
ViewState is disabled for this custom control.
I have also try relocate some code, change the full function call with micro optimizes, no again fail.
Is work fine on development computer. I place batch="true" on web.config and the bug appears right away.
There are no other issues like that, like a bug that we can not fix no matter what. The system is run for days, the pool is NOT recycle at all, the memory is stable, and there is more free to use. The program is run for years now, but we change is almost every day with updates.
Under the same core code runs more than one sites (something like stackexchange) and all have the same random problem.
The AutoEventWireup is false
Its appears and on other custom control that I load the same way.
What I do now as workaround when this bug appears: I just force the project to recompile with a small change, and the error go away, until the next update.
I have a bug that try to solve the last tree weeks with out find the reason. I have try almost anything I can thing of, but all fails, and the bug appears again. So I post here maybe some can help me out and find a way out of this.
Last word: This bug is crazy, the custom control is the same, I do anything on it I only load it dynamically and boom, the compiler is have it two different times for some reason that only he knows - randomly.
Update 1
I been able to reproduce the bug on the developer machine. There I discover that the two dll modules that contains this custom control have a different.
The one was a bundle of 4 custom controls together. The other module was the custom control alone.
Workaround
After tree weeks trying to fix this bug I end up that this bug is appears when the compiler make batch compile of a directory, and bundle many different custom controls, in the same dll. So when I try to load it alone is throw this exception.
So I move the problematic custom control in a different directory alone and seems that I avoid it for now.
Update 2
Appears again, even after I move some files to a different directory. Is random and can not find a clear connection with what is triggers its.
Update 3
Because we have spot that the main issue here is the batch compile (batch="true") that compiles on the same dll many custom controls, one way to say to the compiler to NOT do that, is the maxBatchGeneratedFileSize parameter. I use it with a value of 100, and the issue appears again, now I have lower it to 40 and test it.
maxBatchGeneratedFileSize="40"
This can happen when you have batching turned on and have some form of circular references at the directory level.
Please see this answer to see exactly what I mean by 'circular references' in this context, as the meaning is quite subtle.
If you manage to break the cycle (e.g. by moving a user control elsewhere), you will not hit this issue.
Update 1
I would think that in theory, this can only be caused by a cycle, but sometimes they can be hard to detect.
I'll give you an alternative solution which I think will work and is very easy to try (even though it is a bit of a hack). In the user control(s) that is giving you problems, add the following attribute in the directive:
<%# Control Language="C#" [...] CompilerOptions="/define:dummy1" %>
If you see this with some other controls, you can add the same thing but with dummy2, dummy3, etc...
This will have the effect of not batching this one user control, since it has different compilation needs from the others. Technically, you can add any piece of C# command line as the CompilerOptions, but a dummy /define is the simplest and most harmless.
But unlike turning off batching globally, the perf impact will be minimal, since only a very small subset of pages will not be batched.
BTW, it goes without saying that what you're seeing is a bug in ASP.NET, and that bug has been there for probably 10+ years! Maybe at some point it should get addressed :)
In order to track the cause of the problem I believe that's important to know how your control was created. Please refer to this reading: Turning an .ascx User Control into a Redistributable Custom Control.
Step 1: Authoring the User Control
To author the user control, it is best to start with an empty app that
contains nothing other than the ascx. While the authoring of the user
control uses "standard" techniques, there are some restrictions that
you need to be aware of in order for it to be successfully turned into
a standalone custom control.
The main restriction is that the user control needs to be self-contained. That is, it cannot be dependent on app global things
like App_Code or global.asax. The reason for this is that since the
goal is to turn the UserControl into a standalone DLL, it would
break in other apps if it relied on code that is not part of that
DLL. One exception to this rule is that the UserControl can be
dependent on assemblies that live in the bin directory (or in the
GAC). You just have to make sure that the other assemblies are always
available when you use your custom control in other apps.
and
Step 3: Use the Publish Command to Precompile the Site
(...) Select "Use fixed naming and single page assemblies". This
will guarantee that your user control will be compiled into a single
assembly that will have a name based on the ascx file. If you don't
check this option, your user control could be compiled together with
other pages and user controls (if you had some), and the assembly
would receive a random name that would be more difficult to work with.
In my opinion it's very likely that you have the user control compiled and registered in GAC as a separate assembly and also included in your web application DLL.
Note: Maybe this should have been a comment, but I wanted to include the quotes from the forementioned link. I hope it's helpful.
After a lot of debug on a upgraded ASP.NET website, my last bug was this one on runtime.
I just checked the Build/Publish option "use fixed naming and single page assemblies" and it solved my case :)
Here some useful links: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh475319(v=vs.110).aspx
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479044.aspx
http://forums.asp.net/t/960707.aspx
I've recently encountered similar problem when i was compiling a modified version of asp.net MVC 4 and importing the new DLL into the project.
Somehow i was referencing the old versions of the DLLs in the web.config (including the web.config in the views folder)
The error in my case was thrown because the two DLLs were different versions. 4.0.0 and 4.1.0.
Maybe you should look into that.
Maybe specify a version of the compiled files (i'm guessing DLLs)
I hope this helps you fix the problem.
other tips: I'm guessing you have some sort of version control system? if yes , revert all the changes back before this started and look carefully at the code and which models/controls change and how.
if you are not using VCS... there isn't much you can do to revert the changes. And you should start using a VCS.
I have noticed sometimes the designer creates a second CodeBehind designer file, eg you would have:
OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx
OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx.cs
OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx.designer.cs
OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx.designer1.cs
You wont notice if you dont have "Show All Files" option in the Solution Explorer set, but for a web project the compiler will compile all files in the folder, not just the ones included in the project.
Second, if your project is a "Website Project", there are no namespaces, which can lead to many weird errors. Look at this SO question: Namespace problem .net
Finally, I managed to solve seeming random UserControl errors by setting the ClassName attribute on the control file, eg:
<%# Control Language="cs"
AutoEventWireup="false"
CodeBehind="OneProduct_MediumImage.ascx.cs"
Inherits="ASP.Modules_OneProduct_MedioumImage"
ClassName="OneProduct_MediumImageControl" %>
I know if someone wants to re-use some classes (not UI), he must gather all of them and put in a Visual Studio Class Library, build it to some dells and distribute these dlls. In this approach there just one code, you just update code in one place.
But what about ASP.NET's markups? For example you have an .ascx file or a collection of .aspx files regarding user management. If I want to use them in another project I am forced to copy them in new project again. By this I have two same code that is very hard to maintain.
So is it any way to re-use .ascx and .aspx files just like simple .dlls? For example building them?
Many Thanks,
Afshar Mohebbi
With the default configuration, .ascx and .aspx files will need to exist on disk, because they need to have a path associated with them for everything to work. All the code (everything but the first line which specifies which class to inherit) in them, however, can be compiled away into a DLL file. It would probably be possible to get around this by writing custom handlers and build providers that load things from DLLs, but it's not worth the effort.
If you want to put your user controls into a DLL file, create them as custom controls instead of user controls (.ascx files). That's how all the custom control libraries for sale around the 'net are done.