We Keep Coding

Private/Internal Specflow steps

Is it possible to have Specflow steps that are private/internal to a C# project?
Our test platform has several projects that need to access steps from each other. However, we have steps within each project that we don't want to make available to other projects. We need a way to allow access to some steps within a project, but restrict access to others. How can this be done?

Sorry, there is no feature for this.
The binding classes don't need to be public that they can be found. But that doesn't help in your case.
I think the only way you can take is, to split your binding assemblies in more and only use the ones you are allowed to.

Compiling forms in C#

I want to compile each individual form on my application to be used sort of as a dll on its own... I looked into this and found very confusing representations of assemblies, which may or may not be what I wanted.
Is it possible to compile the form1.cs, form1.designer.cs and form1.resx to be 1 single file which then will be able to be used as a dll. I use "dll" as an example because that is the functionality I need with each of these forms when compiled to a single file, I need to be able to call it and use it from a shell application.
I know it is possible in VS to create a separate project which will compile into a dll but with something on the verge of 80 forms to compile... it will be a messy thing to maintain. So basically, is there an easier way?
this is the closest code I could get, but it is in console, so it will be impractical if there are easier ways... also I am not sure if it will actualy compile form1.cs, form1.designer.cs and form1.resx and still work as a dll
csc /target:library /out:MathLibrary.DLL Add.cs Mult.cs
Thanks for the help

Possible? Yes. Advisable? Umm, not sure.
You must study the CSC options to use it in such a massive way.
Partial classes are simply each listed among the sources. See here
The RESX file must be compiled by ResGen.exe to a resources file see here
You will use the /References parameter to include other DLLs.
The real challenge will probably come when you try to get cross references to work, depending on the layout of your application. Is there a main hub that will control all forms? Is it a plug-in architecture?
Good luck

Basically, you are working with solution. It can contain multiple projects. For each dll, you must have one project. So create 80 projects, add to each of them single form, edit it, add some logic.
Then there will be a main project, which produce exe. You can reference all dlls in that project, but better don't. If you do, updating any of dll will required recompiling that exe too. You can load them dynamically or use sort of plugin system (to enumerate dlls, understand their purpose, etc). Then you obtain Type from assembly (loaded dll), create instance (which will call constructor, which calls InitializeComponents, which loads form resources) and display form.
Regarding abstraction, you surely need something. To example, login window. You can create a generic form with some focus, user interface and user interaction logic. But it has to communicated with main project (which encapsulate encryption, password storage model, user rights, etc). One easy way to do this is to provide 2 interfaces:
interface ILoginImplementation
{
public void SetInitialUserName(string name);
}
interface ILoginLogic
{
public bool TryAuthenticate(string name, string password);
}
Implementation is what your form must implement and Logic is what main project implements and supply when instantiating login form.

I realize this is probably not ideal, but I still think your best bet is to use Visual Studio and create a separate project for each .dll to be created.
By right clicking the Solution node and selecting Add > New Solution Folder, you can at least organize your projects into a somewhat more orderly hierarchy. That alone might go a long way to make your project more manageable.
PS: If you haven't already, you should definitely try to create an interface, or a base class (or both!) that each of your Form-classes can derive from or implement. If you're able to abstract away and generalize some of the logic, it is quite likely to save you a lot of work down the road.

Best way to get an accessable class in all of my projects

I need to declare an attribute for coverage exclusion in my code, the issue is that i have a project group and i wish to create it somewhere where i can access it from all projects when i need it, right now i have it outside of the namespaces so it would be easier to use, and its declared in each project like:
public class CoverageExcludeAttribute : Attribute
{
}
is there any better way to achieve this goal in a way it could be access anywhere in my project group and declared only once, without having to add its namespace (e.g by using the global namespace) to each file i use the attribute in?
Thank you

While I actually agree with P.Brian.Mackey, I think the only way to do it is exactly as DjKraze said:
Create a new micro-project of type ClassLibrary, add a single .cs file with your Coverage(..) class and ensure that class is inside no namespaces block. Then build it and for each one of the other projects do a Add-Reference to that micro-project you just created.. That way it will surely work, and you will have a handy place to put any further 'common code' to be available everywhere.
However, each project will have to be updated with the reference. This is the minimum requirement - all in all, if you want to use anything instead of copying, it must be referred..
Sorry, almost no other options for such thing!
The other way is to .. ugh, copy. You can easily set up a simple pre-build script that will copy given .cs file to each one of your projects, but "adding" the file to the .csproj's build list is a bit harder, still possible with use of some Ruby or Python or friends...
Hm.. saying that, It may be possible to write a pre-build script to inject a reference to the micro-project automatically.. But I wont know if this is worth doing. Do you have more than 50-100 projects? Else, probably it's not worth..

This only applies to VS2010 and above
If you want some source code defined in each of your projects, but without a project reference, take a look at some of the functionality provided by NuGet, especially Source Code Transformations. These allow the addition of some source code to the project when you add the NuGet package to the project.

You can use Dependency Injection
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection
The most popular are: Microsoft Unity, Ninject, NHibernate, StructureMap, Autofac.
Good luck!

Sharing classes between Server and Client projects in Silverlight

Problem: Class B is a subclass of Class A. RIA service returns a list of object Bs. Class A and B are both necessarily defined on the server-side. They serialize fine, and I can use them in the primary client project.
I have two other libraries, organized as client libraries. One is for custom controls, and the other is for classes that are shared between custom controls and the actual client project.
I need Class A to be accessible from the Classes library clientside (so that the custom controls can get to it). How can I do this?
I've done this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee707369%28v=vs.91%29.aspx
but the *.shared.cs convention doesn't give libraries other than the actual Client library access to Class A. The second method (Add as Link) does do what I want it to do, except that updating ClassA.cs in the server project doesn't cause the Client version to update, making it necessary to update both class files each time they're changed, which is unacceptable.
edit: Add as Link worked great after trying again several times.

In Visual Studio (2010, at least — dunno exactly whe the feature was added), you can add an existing item to a project as a 'link', meaning the source file is shared between projects. Only one version of the source file exists.
Right-click on your project.
Click on 'Add..Existing Item'.
Find the source file of choice and select it.
The 'Add' Button is a drop-down. Click the drop-down icon in the button.
Click on 'Add As Link'.
Easy!
Now any change to the share source file is reflected on both places. The drawback, of course, is that the developer gets no indication that changes to the shared source file might have wider ramifications than she might realize.
Another option would be to create a hard link so two file names reference the same file ('inode' in Unix terms). On the command line, just chant the magic incantation:
fsutil hardlink create <new-filename> <existing-filename>
something like:
fsutil hardlink create c:\foo\bar\some-project\bazbat.cs c:\foo\bar\another-project\bazbat.cs
The restriction is that both names have to be on the same volume.
This has the possibility, of course, confusing your source control system. I'm willing to bet that TFS hasn't consider the possibility that a filesystem isn't necessarily a tree structure and that the same file might exist in multiple directories.
Hard-linked files may be deleted in any order: the file ceases to exist when the last link to gets removed.
The 3rd option, of course, and likely the "best-practice" — hate that term! — is to factor out the shard classes into an independent assembly that gets deployed to both the client and server. If want to limit the number of assemblies floating around, post-build, you can use ilmerge to merge assemblies:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/9364/Merging-NET-assemblies-using-ILMerge
Merge two assemblies at runtime - C#
How to merge multiple assemblies into one?
Come to think of it, there's also no reason you can't embed the shared assemblies as embedded resources that get loaded on demand (or even at startup). This might even be cleaner than using ilmerge. Here's how to do that:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2010/02/03/jeffrey-richter-excerpt-2-from-clr-via-c-third-edition.aspx

What is an easily maintainable way to share a common .net class library over many corporate asp.net mvc 3 web applications?

I've been struggling to do this in a way that fulfills all of my requirements.
Here is what we have in our library:
Base classes for controllers and services
Business objects (stores, departments, etc)
Common Partial Views (Login, Error, etc)
Base class for HttpApplication
General common code (read an INI file, create a db conn, etc)
The one requirement that has been giving me trouble is as follows:
Lives in one place on a server. (i.e. copy local = false)
This breaks because:
The DLL containing the HttpApplication class must be in the same directory as the web apps dll to launch. I haven't found a way around that. I'm ok with duplicating this code in every app, but would rather not.
The shared views don't like to work if I use Assembly.LoadFrom() to load the dll from the shared location. (I've been using this method to precompile my views)
Any namespace shortcuts in web.config break at runtime with compilation errors because the web.config is parsed before the assembly is loaded.
My question to you folks is how do you handle your common code in a similar environment?
The GAC seems to be more trouble than its worth, and we want all of our apps to be using the same code, and not have multiple apps on multiple versions and have to maintain all of that. Are there design patters/best practices that can guide us in this regard?
Also, as a bonus, if you can solve any of the problems above, that would be great, too.
Thanks!
Edit: I guess a question that follows is whether or not we should even have a directory with the common dll(s) on the server, or if they should only be deployed as projects are deployed/updated?

Firstly, you will want to separate out what you're trying to achieve. Don't create 1 library that does everything or you will have a Big Ball of Mud. Don't be afraid to create several maintainable libraries to achieve what you're after. Is there a specific reason it needs to be stored in one location?
For example, several of the items you mention are MVC or web specific. If you have items that can be reused by MVC, create a class library that contains MVC base classes you inherit and reference them in your project. Use the single responsibility principle as much as possible.
Regarding the other items you mentioned, like database connectivity, if it's reusable, abstract it out in a data access class library and reference it. Other simple operations like reading an ini file or creating a file, create another library and abstract it to easy to use methods.
I prefer to copy the library dlls locally. You never know when you will need to make changes to the library, but you don't want all of your projects to stop compiling. When you're ready to implement a new version of the library, copy the dll in and recompile.

Not sure why all the hate towards the gac. It was designed to handle this specific problem. Install your common dlls to the gac and all apps can see them. Need to deploy a new one, just re-install it in one place.