We Keep Coding

How to call a COM object from C#

First, I realize that there are many posts here that discuss this topic. I must have read 20+ of them, easily. But none of them give the answer that I seek.
I have written a tiny C# test COM DLL with a single method in it that prints "I am alive!" in a message box. Using VStudio as admin, I can build and register the COM object. I have successfully called the object from VBA and run the method. And I can see the name of the COM Interface in the VStudio Add Reference / COM dialog box. This all makes me think the object is properly constructed, registered, and usable.
Now I'm trying to call it from a console C# app. Like many others, I'm trying to figure out the equivalent of the VBA "CreateObject("DLLName.ClassName")" code to get hold of the object in C#.
One way is to just add a reference to the DLL to my console app project. I point to the assembly through the Projects section of the Add Reference dialog, not through the COM section of the dialog. Then I can simply say var o = new MyComImplementationClass(); and treat it like any other class. That works, but it means my console app is cheating and not using the COM object through the usual COM GAC interface.
Another way (that doesn't work, but I wish it did), is to add the reference through the COM tab on the Add Reference dialog. I can see it but VS protests that "the XXX.tlb file was exported from a .NET assembly. Add a reference to the assembly instead." Which brings me back to the solution above, which I think means that my app is cheating. (I didn't have to add references to my VBA test app, for example.)
Another way is to use Type.GetTypeFromProgId as shown by this code fragment below. But I can't get that to work either. I must be passing in the incorrect ProgID string - I get the sense it has something to do with registry info and is not the same "DLLName.ClassName" string that I feed CreateObject() in VBA.
public static dynamic ComObjectGet () {
const string progID = "ComExampleDLLName.ComImplementationClassName";
Type foo = Type.GetTypeFromProgID (progID);
dynamic COMobject = Activator.CreateInstance (foo);
return COMobject;
}
Worse yet, on this MSDN example page it says "This method is provided for COM support. Program IDs are not used in Microsoft .NET Framework because they have been superseded by the concept of namespace." So probably I should not be using the GetTypeFromProgID at all.
If it helps any, I can use VSTO in C# to call the MSOffice primary interop assemblies. But they load from the COM tab of the add reference dialogs (which is where I want my COM library to load from).
For clarity, my COM DLL name is ComExampleLibrary.dll. The default namespace is ComExampleNamespace. The interface name is IComInterface, and the implementation classname is ComImplementation. The internal method name is Run.
Could someone give me instructions or a code snippet that does the "right, approved" thing for calling COM objects (not just the ones I write) from C#? Thank you.

Thanks to the people who helped me out, here is the answer. Both GetTypeFromProgID and GetTypeFromCLSID work as shown below. My problem was that I was using "AssemblyName.ClassName" instead of "Namespace.ClassName" in the call to GetTypeFromProgID.
public static dynamic ComObjectGet () {
const string progID = "ComExampleNamespace.ComImplementation";
Type foo = Type.GetTypeFromProgID (progID);
//var bar = Guid.Parse ("99929AA7-0334-4B2D-AC74-5E282A12D06C");
//Type foo = Type.GetTypeFromCLSID (bar);
dynamic COMobject = Activator.CreateInstance (foo);
return COMobject;
}
So my original code was correct, but I was passing in the wrong argument. This snippet is the equivalent of the VBA CreateObject("Namespace.ClassName") call.
I still don't know why I cannot add a reference to the COM item in the COM tab of the Add Reference dialog like I would for any other COM object. I suppose that's a different question.

Is there any way to auto run some code in DLL?

I have some DLL from third party that I need to license. It has some method that I must call from my own DLL. My DLL is referenced in couple of projects and I don't want to make changes to every hoster. Is there any method that I can use within my DLL which will call some method in my DLL? Like add some static class or constructor but without explicit call to that class from hosters? I am not sure if I am explaining it clearly. Please ask questions if needed.
ThirdPartyType license = new ThirdPartyType();
license.Load("license.xml");
This is a piece of licensing code that I want to place in my DLL and call it within the same DLL.

At the low level, the runtime supports "module initializers". However, C# does not provide any way of implementing them, so the closest you can manage is a static constructor ("type initializer") or just a regular constructor.
However, it is probably a bad idea to hook your licencing into either a module initializer or a type initializer, as you don't know when they will run, and it could impact code that wasn't going to access your lib. It is somewhat frowned upon to take someone's app down because your licensing code decided it was unhappy - especially if your library wasn't actively being invoked at the time.
As such: I suggest the most appropriate place to do this is in either a constructor, or a post-construction Initialize(...) method (with the tool refusing to work unless supplied with valid details).

Early Binding of a C# COM library in VBA

Although this is a long question the coding and testing part should be really easy to reproduce.
I have created two separate Class Libraries in C# and I think I am running into a name collision problem caused by existing registry keys from my previous projects and trials.
Here are my two classes:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace Test
{
[InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsDual),
Guid("ED5D264B-1D80-4A5D-9C14-8297D90B7037")]
public interface ITest
{
// body
}
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
[Guid("8B261B92-8EC5-4CDC-A551-67DEB42137FF")]
[ProgId("Test.TestClass")]
public class TestClass : ITest
{
// body
}
}
and
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using ADODB;
namespace Test
{
[InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsDual),
Guid("ED5D264B-1D80-4A5D-9C14-8297D90B7037")]
public interface IConnection
{
// body
}
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
[Guid("8B261B92-8EC5-4CDC-A551-67DEB42137FF")]
[ProgId("Test.Connection")]
public class Connection : IConnection
{
// body
}
}
I have Exposed .Net Components to COM like this:
In order to access the assemblies from Excel I have added the ADODB references to the assembly, ticked make assembly COM visible and register for com interop. Also, I've added references to each *.tlb file(2 files for two projects) so I can access them using an early binding and use VBA Intellisense.
I have followed the same procedure on another machine and I can use early binding using the Connection as class.
I am thinking there are some old registry keys I haven't deleted on my original machine which will not allow me to use Connection as the class name in VBE. I've manually scanned my registry and deleted everything I could think of related to my project.
I have also deleted the project entirely and used a 3rd party software to scan registry for missing dlls however that didn't help:/
Removed all previously registered GUIDs and applied new ones each time I created a new Project (just in case)
Created new projects using different namespaces and class names (using ADODB;) I haven't been able to use early binding yet like this Test.Connection therefore I am assuming I have a name collision problem. I am suspecting the name class Connection to be causing it although I am not 100% sure.
The Test.TestClass namespace in VBA:
I can declare and use instances of the TestClass type in two ways using early binding:
Dim x as Test.TestClass
Dim x as TestClass
Now going into VBE Object Explorer F2 the TestClass is properly displayed in comparison to other libraries and general idea of using COMs.
However, when I want to use the Test.Connection library I am unable to use early binding following the same pattern as TestClass because the generated *.tlb file automatically changes(renames) the ProgId's. So, instead I have to bind it like this
Dim x As Test.Test_Connection
Dim x As Test_Connection
and the Object Explorer displays the names using _ (underscores) and not . (dots), which is easy to explain why this happens - keep reading :)
As it stands I am sure it is not the VBE environment that changes the names to avoid collisions. It is the VS' *.tlb generator.
I went to the assembly folder and opened both *.tlb files in Notepad++. I can clearly see that the *.tlb for the Test.Connection library already includes the names with the _s unlike the Test.TestClass which has .s
I have tried to manually edit the *.tlb file but as its a mixed binary file it takes some effect but also causes Excel to stop responding in some weird ways so I have to avoid this method.
I think I have explained well what the problem is and where it comes from. Now my question is: Are there any attributes to use in C# code to tell the *.tlb generator not to override my ProdIds? Are there any alternative ways of manipulating *.tlb files? Is this issue a name collision and is it avoidable without changing the name of Connection class?
I'm sorry for such long question but I have been digging and digging for almost a week now and I still cant solve this.
Note: In VBA ( or VBE Object Explorer ) using IntelliSense ctrl+space it does not seem that either Connection or Recordset have been used. Since they are not already reserved in the VBE environment I recon it has to do with my library itself.
As a reference to why this issue has been raised here, please see VBA equivalent to C# using or VB.NET imports creating aliases
Thank you very much for your time!

Do avoid focusing on the ProgId. You are not actually using it, the dialogs that you made a screenshot of show the actual class names, not the ProgId.
Getting the class name renamed to "Test_Connection" is normal behavior for the type library exporter. It will do so whenever it detects a conflict with another interface or class name that has the same name. You are certainly increasing the likelihood of this happening by also having a dependency on ADODB, it also has a Connection class. A very trivial solution is to simply rename your own type.
Your code snippet cannot reproduce this problem. But of course it is incomplete, we can't see what you are really doing in the code. You'll bring in the dependency on ADODB if any of your public methods use a type from this type library. Also note that there are non-zero odds that this will happen by accident. You might have written a method that intended to use your own Connection type but the compiler resolved it to the ADODB type.
An essential tool to debug this is Oleview.exe, run it from the Visual Studio Command Prompt. First create the type library for your C# assembly with Tlbexp.exe. Then use File + View Typelib, you'll see the content of your type library expressed in the IDL syntax. You'll have little trouble recognizing the mapping of your C# types to the IDL declarations.
Pay attention to the importlib directives at the top of the file. They should look like this:
// TLib : // TLib : mscorlib.dll : {BED7F4EA-1A96-11D2-8F08-00A0C9A6186D}
importlib("mscorlib.tlb");
// TLib : OLE Automation : {00020430-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
importlib("stdole2.tlb");
There should only be those two. The first one imports the .NET types, defining _Object. The second one imports standard COM types, like IDispatch. If you see additional ones here then you increase the odds of a name collision.
This IDL also gives you a way to solve the problem, in case it is unsolvable, you can edit it to name the types the way you want them. Save it to a .idl file. And compile it with midl.exe /tlb to generate a type library with your preferred names. Do note that this is not something you want to have to do often.

How is compiler dealing with these Generic Plugin Interface instance methods?

I'm working with some, unfortunately largely undocumented, existing code and I'm having trouble understanding how it calls upon the methods of the plugins it loads.
My aim at the moment is simply to step into one of the methods loaded via the plugin manager, as it's causing an exception. However I had to rebuild the pluginManager from the source to get debug symbols and when I reference this new DLL version the compiler throws up arms.
The code appears to load the plugin into plug.Instance and then access the specific methods like so plug.Instance.ReturnLeaNumber();
This compiler error makes sense, because it doesn't know the details of the plugins. What confuses me is how the compiler ever knew these where valid before run time, when no plugins are initialized. I can step through the code that doesn't work now with the older DLL!
This is an example of where the program loads up a plugin.
plug = GenericServicePlugins.AvailablePlugins.Find(Application.StartupPath + "\\Dlls\\SchoolInterface.dll");
// Compiler doesn't like this next line anymore though
plug.Instance.Initialize(null, null);
If there are any differences between my rebuilt library and the previously working one, I can't tell how as the versions match up with the ones in our source control. Would appreciate some advice on where to start looking!
public interface IGenericPluginMasterInterface
{
String returnName();
void Initialize(ExceptionStringResources.Translate ExceptionStrings);
Object ExecuteFunction(String macAddress, bool log, String functionName, LoginCredentials logonCredentials, WebConfiguration webConfig,
Int64 dataLinkId, DataLinkParam[] dataLinkParams, String dataName,
DataParam[] dataParams, Object[] additionalParams);
}
Rest of Manager code on PasteBin
How does the compiler know about these plug.Instance.Method() methods before runtime?
Edit:
I've not quite worked this out yet, but there was a "PluginsService" file I missed which partly mirrors the "GenericPluginServices".
I think this error could have been caused when I removed parts of this class that related to an now defunct plugin, which I am looking into. However I figured posting this other code snippet would help the question.
PluginService.cs code
GenericPluginService code

Find returns AvailablePlugin, so .Instance is of type IGenericPluginMasterInterface; if so, indeed; that .Instance.ReturnLeaNumber() can't possibly work...
The only way that could work (without introducing some generics etc) is if .Instance actually returned dynamic. With dynamic the name/method resolution is happening at runtime. The compiler treats dynamic very deliberately such as to defer all resolution to runtime, based on either reflection (for simple cases) or IDynamicMetaObjectProvider (for more sohpisticated cases).
However, if the code you have doesn't match what was compiled, then: we can't tell you what it was. IMO, the best option is to get hold of the working dll, and look at it in reflector to see what it is actually doing, and how it is different to the source code that you have.
Actually, strictly speaking it could still do that with the code you've pasted, but only if plug is typed as dynamic, i.e. dynamic plug = ...

Launching a C# dialog from an unmanaged C++ mfc active x dll

I've been told to write a dialog in C# which must be instantiated from an unmanaged c++ dll. We do this in other places in our code by simply adding a managed c++ class to the C++ project, then calling the C# dll from the managed c++ class. However I'm finding that doesn't work for me from where I have to do it. I think because the c++ dll is an MFCActiveX project. As soon as i set the clr on any file in this project, it will no longer register correctly. When i attempt to register it, i get three errors, then a message that it registered. However when i try to use it i get a 0x80040111 "ClassFactory cannot supply requested class" error.
If anyone has any idea what the problem is here i would greatly appreciate it. I either need to be able to accomplish this (preferred) or prove that it's not possible.
Thanks

I can't see how a MFCActiveX project would prevent you from creating the C# class in this way. Unless it simply does not allow for a managed class to be added.
If you can't get the managed C++ class trick to work, another option is to use COM. It's possible to register a factory of sorts in the C# project as a COM object. Say give it the following interface
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("babe87fc-1467-4913-a1d3-47eeedf1afb5")]
public interface IDialogFactory {
void Create();
}
You'd also have to create a backing class as well. But then you could register the managed assembly and use COM to access it.

You must now register it with "regasm" instead of "regsvr32".