We Keep Coding

Prevent deleting a folder during uninstall

Is there any possible way to prevent files in a folder being removed or from over written during re installation? i have a folder where i store some templates for sending mails which user can edit.I have added the basic templates in my setup and so during re installation it removes the templates which the user might have already edited and places a new copy of the template.How can i prevent this?Should i use installer class or is there any property that i can use?Please Guide.

See:
File Versioning Rules (Windows)
Especially:
Neither File Has a Version (Windows)
You are using a tool that makes every single file a key file of it's own components. Therefore, you should already be getting this default behavior. If you set Permanent, they should not get removed. You said that the use "can" modify these files. The behavior is that if they haven't modified the files, they will get overwritten and if they have modified the files they will not.
However, IMO, a better pattern is to have an override directory that users can copy templates to and modify. You can get into undesired behaviors on upgrades resulting from the conflict of 1) My new build fixes something and 2) I can't install it because the old stuff has user data. This is especially true for things like XML files.

this can be done by selecting the file properties and setting the value of permanent to true.

defining location of files at deployment time

I have an app that has search functionality. The search algorithm is compiled to a separate dll. In the C# code for the search algorithm, I am using strings held in a settings file to point to the directory where the search index resides. But once the search code is compiled, the settings file is somehow incorporated in the dll. I want to have multiple versions of this code running on my server with each pointing to a different location for the index. And I want the operator to change a file to have each version point to something else as they find necessary. Both config files and settings files end up getting incorporated in the dll. How do I then accomplish this? What is the right industry standard way of doing this?

It's strange that the settings file is compiled... are you sure about that? Setting, config and resx files should be copied to the output directory, it's even a property you can modify on solution explorer. Then you should get it's values by doing
System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Get("YourKey")
But I think this won't know about user changes until app is restarted. If you want settings to be dynamic you should either store them on a database, or on a file that you open, read and close every time you need it.
Hope this helped!

C# settings hidden for user

I want to get and set some application settings hidden for the user. In this case these are two tokens and two tokens that are being altered by the application. But still all four them are a secret to the application user.
I found two ways on MSDN and this forum.
Use a .config file. -> this sounds okay and I can change some values in it. But I see still a plain text file after publish.
Use the settings in the project properties. -> should it be? I read warnings about that this not so secure after all.
A lot of sites describe a web server solution while I just want to have a desktop solution.
Btw. It is not a commercial product, I am making a hobby project to learn more from C#.net.

If these files need to be altered by the application, you will need to persist these outside of the application so that the new settings will be loaded next time the app starts.
For this, you can always create a config (or settings) file and hide it in the System.IO.IsolatedStorage files for the assembly. This is still editable by the user, but its a bit of a pain to find - plus this will transfer over with roaming profiles so that the settings are used cross machine.
Something simple to help you start out:
IsolatedStorage.IsolatedStorageFile storage = IsolatedStorage.IsolatedStorageFile.GetUserStoreForAssembly();
string subdirectory = "SomeDirectory";
storage.CreateFile(System.IO.Path.Combine(subdirectory, "settings.config"));

Does the * existence* of the setting need to be kept secret, or just its value?
If the latter, I'd suggest encrypting the value you save to the .config file.

Settings For Individual Programmers In A Config File

I'm wondering if there is a way to create settings in a config file for individual programmers. The situation I'm encountering is that there are some programmers who want settings turned on and several that want them turned off. Our config files are in SVN source control, so using a shared config file means we are always overwriting each others settings. We are doing this for an ASP.NET web application project. My initial thoughts would be to create a config file outside of source control, but how do I make it so that each programmer has his own copy?
Here is some further clarification. We have a link in the main web.config file that points to an environment-based file (e.g. file used for dev, staging and live).
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<appSettings configSource="EnvironmentConfigs\appSettings.config" />
...
</configuration>
Inside the appSettings.config file, we have settings for dev, staging and live. What I'd like to do is create another config file called user.config and have the individual programmer settings staored there (not in source control of course). What do I need to do in order to have visual studio read from this new file?

The settings file does not need to be versioned in SVN, or each developer can select their settings file to not be overwritten or committed. See the SVN settings file, it could even be added as a global ignore.

Each developer can set up their own build congifuration in Visual Studio. This build configuration should be linked to a build script, which replaces sections of the Web.Config/App.Config/*.Config files specifically as the developer wants.
This way, when they want to make changes to the config files to suit themselves, they should change the replacements in the build script rather than changing the config file directly.
This article covers some of the points i've mentioned: http://www.diaryofaninja.com/blog/2010/05/09/automated-site-deployments-with-teamcity-deployment-projects-amp-svn

Remove the config file from source control and set the svn:ignore property on it. Then it won't be committed. Then, also create another file, like, Production.web.config, that has the production values in it, so you still keep those around too.
That's what I do!

Don't commit config file changes unless they are new settings that to be sent to everyone.
Otherwise, checkout, edit, and leave it checked out. You'll know if someone else has added/modified the file when you get latest version. At which time you merge your settings with their changes, but leave it checked out on your machine.

We do not store application configuration files in source control. Instead, in source control, we store a configuration file template, usually named something like web.config.template. Each developer has their own 'values' file, usually named web.config.values-bem for instance. Each developer also sets up a post-commit hook which takes the template file, and processes it, replacing 'variables' with their values from the specified values file.
For instance, my config values file has the following definition in it:
DB_SERVER=.\SQLEXPRESS
In the web.config.template file, this exists:
connectionString="server=#DB_SERVER#[DEV1];Persist Security Info=True;Password=#DB_PW#;User ID=#DB_USER#;database=#DB_NAME#;Enlist=false;Max Pool Size=100" />
So when the process runs (a python script), it replaces all instances of #DB_SERVER# with the setting I have in my values file. The template script allows for default values to be specified right in the template as well, so you can make changes to the template file and not break other developers' environments (usually). (The default values are next to the variable, in square brackets.)
This solution allows each developer to have their own settings, but still have a web.config.template file that's versioned, and each developer avoids 'inflicting' configuration changes on other developers.
This works well for us. If you want to use the same scheme, you can check out the code for it on my github: https://github.com/bmontgomery/FileReplace. I can help you with the hook scripts as well if you're interested in that.

C# -> Updating an AppSettings.config file on Win7/Vista

I can't see anything on here but I do remember being told that If you want an application to update a config file then it needs to be under ...
**C:\Users\Ibrar Mumtaz\AppData**
Well somewhere there, the reason being is that the user should have permisions to update a config file here and not under the applications install folder. This is the impression that I am under and I'm fairly certain that this is definately the case. As I think I read that on here = p
My question is, is there anybody on here that can shine some light on this as this is the last feature I want to implement before I give my application out to test.
1) First thing is, an installer is needed to set up the folder and then drop my apps config file into it. I already am using the visial studio installer so I have my app packaged up but this point is throwing me off? How do I do this then? I just need someone to show how to do this and I should be O.K reconfiguring my app to look for the new home of the config file.
2) I should be able to work out how to find the folder and locate the config file found within it. As once I know the installer is chucking the config file out into the right folder where the user has permissions then it should be straight forward from there.
Thanks for reading.
UPDATE:
It was pretty straight foward, as the VS Installer has an option to add a special folder so all that was left was to access the folder programmatically and read and write to the config file. ONE PROBLEM? The ConfigurationManager class which I have used to create my config file for my application expects my config file to be local to the application and not miles away in a completey different part of the local FileSystem? Errr help here Plz?
Ibrar

If you are using the VS Settings file to create application setting keys, and have values that the user might want to change in runtime, and save his preferences, just set the scope of those settings to "User" instead of "Application".
That way you will have a setter method for them, and you can edit the Settings.Default instance, and when you are done call the Save() method to persist them to disk.
The file will be saved in the user's "AppData" folder, wherever it is, under some cryptic folder. But you needn't worry about it's location most of the time, since it will be read automatically on the next execute, and persisted to the same location on subsequent runs.

Afaik the installer can be extended with classes that do things.
On INSTALL-action to do could be to
var path = Path.Combine(Environment.GetFolderPath(Environment.SpecialFolder.ApplicationData),
"My app name");
if (!Directory.Exists(path)) Directory.CreateDirectory(path);
And vice-versa on uninstall.
App.config files are related to where the physical assembly is located I think.

Actually, if your app is running on the user's machine- it will have whatever permissions that user has. So most likely, you can expect to be able to write anywhere on the file system.
However it is possible the user would be running under a restricted acct, and thus not have the permissions. So you could just use the registry to store where your config file is (install folder), then when you try to update it, if it fails for permissions, ask the user to grant it.
Or you could use the Windows standard folders, as you were getting at, because doing so also separates out user data from application data.
Use the Environment.GetFolderPath () method to get the 'special folder' paths in your app.
http://www.programmersheaven.com/2/Les_CSharp_15_p2
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/14tx8hby.aspx

If you are talking about application settings found on project Properties -> Settings tab, then there're two different types of settings: user-level and application-level.
If you need to change any settings in run-time, these would be user-level settings (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cftf714c.aspx) and all changes would be buried somewhere in the private folder in your user profile.
If you want to update application-level settings, your best shot would be to do that during software installation. In this case you don't need to look for the configuration file (YourApp.exe.config) anywhere but in the application folder. More likely you would need to create some sort of post-install event handler in your setup package and run some script or another application which would update data in YourApp.exe.config. Everything in the setup package will be executed with elevated priviledges and thus that configuration file would be writeable. BTW, this scenario applies to 2000 and XP, if the user is using limited user account type priviledges.

Because I did not technically find the answer I was looking for, after 6 months I have come back to my application and have managed to produce a solution that does not break my current architecture.
If you are implementing an application to make use of some of the features on offer by the ConfigurationManager then it offers a static method called:
ConfigurationManager.OpenMappedExeConfiguration(); // takes two arguements.
It can be used like this:
ExeConfigurationFileMap fileMap = new ExeConfigurationFileMap();
fileMap.ExeConfigFilename = returnUsersAppDataFolderPath();
Configuration config = ConfigurationManager.OpenMappedExeConfiguration(fileMap, ConfigurationUserLevel.None);
e.g
fileMap.ExeConfigFileName = #"some file path external to your applications install folder."
remember to use '#' symbol in front to allow the compiler to literally treat the string on as is basis.
If the config file can be conveniently locally located then just use the:
ConfigurationManager.OpenExeConfiguration(string exePath)
Above is what you would typically use but for me i needed my config file to located under the users AppData folder so the first option is what I needed. And it does indeed work.
I hope this helps others as it does for me as I want to deploy my application to Win7 and vista environments therefore this question needed asking if I was to stick to using the ConfigurationManager it's a shame the method of choice in the end never really stood out in the first place = ).
If you want to read from your config file then leave a comment and I will show you how I managed to do that also.