I'm just getting into WCF programming. I've set up a self-hosted test web service on my work computer, which is behind a firewall; it's at http://localhost:8000/MyTestService. I can access the service page through the browser; all working fine.
Now I want to access that service from my home computer, which is on a different network. I have a dynamic dns (call it mydomain.dyndns.org) set up to point to my work router. Have tested, dyndns is pointing to the right address.
Now I have installed a test app on my home computer to connect to my web service. So I configured my NAT for forward requests on port 8000 to my work computer, on the same port number.
On my home computer I now open a browser and navigate to http://mydomain.dyndns.org:8000/MyTestService. Nothing doing.
Obviously I'm missing something really fundamental about NATs and port forwarding... but as I say, I'm kinda new at this aspect of programming, and I'd really appreciate some guidance here!
Do you see an error or an empty page? Can you check canyouseeme.org from the computer behind the firewall that the port is really open? Can you check with tools like sysinternals tcpview that the connection attempt reaches this computer and not just the router?
I had the same problem.
after a good help from this toppic. http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/140317/WCF-services-and-Windows-Firewall. My WCF Service worked well on the local LAN even with the firewall active.
But it was not accessible over the internet.
After port forwarding i could see the service description. but I couldn't use it.
This article http://gavinmckay.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/howto-fix-wcf-host-name-on-iis/ points me in the right direction.
The service is visible, but connections to your web server will fail because the WSDL is pointing to the non-published server name and your client won’t be able to get there.
In my case a I need to change the self hosted wcf the local endpoint to the public one.
// 1 Create a URI to serve as the base address.
Uri baseAddress = new Uri("http://publicdomain.com:8000/GettingStarted/");
// Step 2 Create a ServiceHost instance
ServiceHost selfHostRemote = new ServiceHost(typeof(MyService), baseAddress);
Related
I've managed to get my WCF service working on IIS express and IIS locally via localhost. I was wondering how I can deploy the service so that it can be accessed outside my network i.e http: // public ip. I've done a lot of digging around and can't seem to find the right answer.
I've tried setting the IP bindings on IIS to my public IP but I get 'Bad request - invalid hostname'.
I have opened all necessary ports and host my own apache server which is accessible outside my network, so I know that the ports side of things is fine. I'm just having issues with the server hosting (IIS).
Any ideas how this can be achieved?
I have a WCF service which works fine when accessed internally. The WCF link is
.
I requested the network team at our organization to expose this WCF to outside world since public websites will access this WCF. I gave the network team DNS as somewebsite.com and IP address of the server on which WCF is hosted.
After getting the confirmation from Network team (they use Juniper network ) that they have made the required settings to make the WCF available to outside world I tested it as an external user.
If I type in http://somewebsite.com/LookUp.svc on address bar I get http 404 page not found error. However if I replace http with httpS as then I see the WCF information. To further test it , I added a simple html file to the root of the website and opened as
http://somewebsite.com/test.html. The Test.html does not open when http is used. However it I use httpS as then Test.html page is displayed to outside users.
The WCF is hosted to windows 2008 R2 and is communicating over port 80 and I have also added the site binding as somewebsite.com with Type as Http and port as 80.
Any idea why WCF caanot be accseed over http ?. I want it to be accessed over http only ?. The WCF uses basicHttpBinding
Is the setting wrong on server on which WCF is hosted ?
Any suggestion is greatly appreciated..
If the service worked before over http before your network guys opened the firewalls I would suggest that they have only enabled the firewall for https traffic.
Sounds like a firewall/routing problem to me...
HTH
We developed an application in Silverlight / C # / WCF.
Used in our service, custom binding.
The service implements methods beyond DUPLEX CRUD methods with the TCP protocol.
Due to the net, owning our endpoint URL: net.tcp://localhost:4502/Aplicacao/ncServico.svc"
Everything works on an intranet on port 80.
Now, did the port 8080 NAT router and configure IIS to port 8080 and we want to access the application from another network.
In the test we are using a 3G modem; typed into the browser: :8080/Aplication/
We arrived at the home screen of the application, but the service is not called by the application.
I can see the WSDL of the service on our application does not see the service.
Understand: there is no error, just the service was not found by the application of an external network.
I have in inetpub\wwwrooot files: clientaccesspolicy.xml and crossdomain.xml
I saw now that even in intranet service is not found in the published application and port 8080. The WSDL opens normally!
Does anyone know how to solve the problem?
thank you
I've been looking all over the site and on stack overflow and I just can solve my issue.
Network Setup
The way my network on my staging world is that I have clients looking at my web app on a 443 port - https, but the underlying structure is listening on 80 port - http. So when my apps talk to each other its on port 80, but when the clients visit the site its port 443. So for example, my svc called from silverlight would be on port 80.
I should also point out that on my staging and test domains: I have a web server acting as a portal to my app server; but this shouldn't really matter since I was able to get this working on test. It's just that staging has the HTTP forwarding to HTTPS.
Application
I have a silverlight xap file that is on the same domain as my hosted web application using IIS 6.
Now since my silverlight xap file and my web application are on the same domain, I have no problems running this on dev and test, but when I try to deploy to staging I'm getting a weird cross domain reference problem:
"System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: An error occurred while trying to make a request to URI . This could be due to attempting to access a service in a cross-domain way without a proper cross-domain policy in place, or a policy that is unsuitable for Soap services."
Digging around, I realize that my app thinks that my xap (or the service I'm calling) and my web app are on a different domain, and looks for the crossdomain.xml and clientaccesspolicy.xml files automatically, I can't really stop it. However, in my application, this is not the case. They both reside on the same domain. I have used fiddler and I didn't see anything about another domain or even a subdomain for that matter.
Browser Issues
Another weird thing that I found out is an issue with chrome vs ie:
On chrome it finds the crossdomain.xml and clientaccesspolicy.xml telling me its insecure, then it does another fetch from the https side, signalling a 404 error. However, on IE I'm getting a 302 redirect. On microsoft's doc about clientaccesspolicy.xml you aren't supposed to do any redirects from the xml file; this is mentioned here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc838250(v=vs.95).aspx
So my question is, if my app and xap are on the same domain, why are those xmls trying to get fetched? Is it because I'm using a DNS instead of an IP address? I also stumbled upon this site: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff921170(v=pandp.20).aspx
It states: To avoid cross-domain call issues, the remote modules' XAP files should be located on the same domain as the main application; when deployed like this, the Ref property on the ModuleCatalog should be a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) relative to the main XAP file location on the Web server.
What does that even mean??
EDIT
Okay so I changed the services to point to https instead of http. However new error comes out: The provided URI scheme 'https' is invalid; expected http.
The good thing is, it doesn't even check crossdomain.xml or clientaccesspolicy.xml; so it now realizes it's on the same domain. But now it's expecting a service on port 80, but the name has to follow as https:// in order for it to work.
I think the only solution I have now is to break it off as being a virtual directory, make it a root node of its own website, and make the whole thing as 443. Save myself the headache.
It sounds like you're working in an environment where there is a load balancer offloading the SSL traffic. In this situation, your client(Silverlight) needs to be configured for HTTPS and your server must be configured for HTTP. This is because a device between the two parties is decrypting the SSL data.
In situations like this, aside from the normal client and server side configurations, your server side code needs to be a bit more forgiving about the address of the request.
You likely also need to add an attribute to your service implementation to allow your client to call over HTTPS, but have your service listening on HTTP.
Add this to your service:
[ServiceBehavior(AddressFilterMode = AddressFilterMode.Any)]
This allows your client to call https://my.domain.com/service.svc and have your server live at http://my.domain.com/service.svc.
Here are some links that might help as well:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/b5ae495b-f5fb-4eed-ae21-2b2280d4fec3/address-filter-mismatch-wcf-addressing
http://www.i-m-code.com/blog/blog/2011/11/30/hosting-silverlight-over-http-under-f5-big-ip/
http://www.i-m-code.com/blog/blog/2011/08/18/hosting-silverlight-under-https/
I manage a web site for company that hired me after being unsatisfied with the original developer of the site. One function of this site is to add new patients. Part of adding the patient is to receive data from a USB port on the client machine via an applet. Since the Java 7 update 21 the applet does not work and the company has asked to remove the applet and replace it with a different solution. I am having trouble doing this, however, due to the applet listening to the client USB ports from the server to retrieve the data. I Have thought of a few ideas to solve this but am unsure if it is possible and haven't been able to find the answer online. I was hoping someone here could tell me if my idea is possible or point me in the right direction.
When the user adds a new patient the web site will call a web service on the server. This web service will then call a WCF hosted Windows Service on the client and active its serial port listener. Once the client's Windows Service has received the data the WCF will respond to the Web Service on the server and parse the data.
What I'm having trouble with is finding a way that the web service can call the WCF downloaded by the client and have it begin listening to the USB ports. If anyone could tell me how to do this, or suggest a better way to have the server initiate the client listening to the serial port I would appreciate it.
Do you have any system requirements?
When entering new patient, what kind of browsers are expected?
Will this be deployed as one solution, or clients expect that your application
can support any modern browser?
The main problem is that browsers are very restrictive in terms of what
kind of code you are allowed to execute. By default, browser won't allow
to execute any plugins / read any usb ports, let alone execution / installation
of arbitrary wcf service.
So, supposing that you have 'any modern browser' in requirements - you have following options:
Java / activex applet plugin. I believe this is the only sure-way to have access to usb
on a client machine. Also plugin must be signed with trusted certificate, or client must allow
execution of untrusted plugin (again, check requirements). I though silverlight would also
be a valid alternative, but according to my research (please correct if I am wrong) - its security
model does not allow any kind of USB access.
Prompt user to download and install browser plugin / helper object with access to usb.
And then communicate with your web page through this plugin.
Installing an entire wcf service on a client side would be an overkill in my opinion.
You would have to manage issues like firewalls, closed ports, security,
writing a self-hosting wcf solution, etc.
But if you managed to install and host a wcf service on a client side:
When the user adds a new patient the web site will call a web service on the server.
This web service will then call a WCF hosted Windows Service on the client and active its serial port listener.
Why not save a roundtrip and call client service directly from page?
Server would need to know client address to call it, which is not always possible.
Probably your web page can attempt to access localhost, at predefined port,
where your wcf service is listening.
Once the client's Windows Service has received the data the WCF
will respond to the Web Service on the server and parse the data.
It would be easier to respond on call from your web page (use polling if usb reading is slow),
and only then send to server. Browser already knows where to send data, and have permission
to do so. But if your server address is well known and can be accessed with domain name,
you can try to connect to it from your wcf on client.
Also there is a very similar topic, discussing connection to usb from client.