I have an .NET 4.0 application using Caliburn.Micro. I want to create a dynamic menu such that I don't need to write XAML code for each menu item. Additionally, I want to associate each command with a key gesture.
I have an interface IAction:
public interface IAction
{
string Name { get; }
InputGesture Gesture { get; }
ICommand Command { get; }
}
In my ViewModel I expose a list of IActions:
private List<IAction> _actions;
public List<IAction> Actions
{
get { return _actions; }
set
{
_actions = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(()=> Actions);
}
}
I bind my Toolbar to the actions as follows:
<ToolBar>
<Menu ItemsSource="{Binding Actions}">
<Menu.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="MenuItem">
<Setter Property="Header" Value="{Binding Name}" />
<Setter Property="Command" Value="{Binding Command}" />
</Style>
</Menu.ItemContainerStyle>
</Menu>
</ToolBar>
All of the above works.
What I'm missing is the databinding of the Key Gesture.
Everywhere I read, I only find examples with static definitions of Window.InputBindings such as:
<Window.InputBindings>
<KeyBinding Key="B" Modifiers="Control" Command="ApplicationCommands.Open" />
</Window.InputBindings>
It would be great if I simply could encapsulate the Window.InputBindings in an ItemsControl, but that doesn't work.
Any of you know how to dynamically bind Window.InputBindings?
Thanks!
Key gestures have to be created for the window object (if they are to have window-wide effect).
I guess you could create a custom derived window object which would have a dependency property named for example BindableInputBindings. This property in its OnChanged callback would add/remove the key bindings every time the source collection changed.
EDIT: There may be some errors.
public class WindowWithBindableKeys: Window {
protected static readonly DependencyProperty BindableKeyBindingsProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"BindableKeyBindings", typeof(CollectionOfYourKeyDefinitions), typeof(WindowWithBindableKeys), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata("", new PropertyChangedCallback(OnBindableKeyBindingsChanged))
);
public CollectionOfYourKeyDefinitions BindableKeyBindings
{
get
{
return (string)GetValue(BindableKeyBindingsProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(BindableKeyBindingsProperty, value);
}
}
private static void OnBindableKeyBindingsChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
(d as WindowWithBindableKeys).InputBindings.Clear();
// add the input bidnings according to the BindableKeyBindings
}
}
Then in XAML
<mynamespace:WindowWithBindableKeys BindableKeyBindings={Binding YourSourceOfKeyBindings} ... > ...
Related
Currently I am trying to display a ObservableCollection of an custom class in a TreeView, when the user double clicks on a 'item' it will fire an method in the ViewModel passing the selected custom class as parameter. I am using the MVVM structure for my WPF Application.
The problem I am facing with this is that the Observable Collection is displayed with an HierarchicalDataTemplate. See underneath the whole XAML code for the TreeView
<TreeView Name="DeviceTreeView" ItemsSource="{Binding ViewableTIADeviceTree}" Grid.Column="3" Margin="5">
<TreeView.Resources>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate DataType="{x:Type treeviewable:ViewableTIADevice}" ItemsSource="{Binding DeviceItems}">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=DeviceName}"/>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type treeviewable:ViewableTIADevice}">
<Setter Property="commandBehaviors:MouseDoubleClick.Command"
Value="{Binding TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}"/>
<Setter Property="commandBehaviors:MouseDoubleClick.CommandParameter"
Value="{Binding}"/>
</Style>
</HierarchicalDataTemplate.ItemContainerStyle>
</HierarchicalDataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type treeviewable:ViewableDeviceItem}">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Name}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TreeView.Resources>
</TreeView>
And the MouseDoubleClick attached behavior class:
public class MouseDoubleClick
{
public static DependencyProperty CommandProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("Command",
typeof(ICommand),
typeof(MouseDoubleClick),
new UIPropertyMetadata(CommandChanged));
public static DependencyProperty CommandParameterProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("CommandParameter",
typeof(object),
typeof(MouseDoubleClick),
new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
public static void SetCommand(DependencyObject target, ICommand value)
{
target.SetValue(CommandProperty, value);
}
public static void SetCommandParameter(DependencyObject target, object value)
{
target.SetValue(CommandParameterProperty, value);
}
public static object GetCommandParameter(DependencyObject target)
{
return target.GetValue(CommandParameterProperty);
}
public static void CommandChanged(DependencyObject target, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
Control control = target as Control;
if(control != null)
{
if((args.NewValue != null) && (args.OldValue == null))
{
control.MouseDoubleClick += OnMouseDoubleClick;
}
else if((args.NewValue == null) && (args.OldValue != null))
{
control.MouseDoubleClick -= OnMouseDoubleClick;
}
}
}
private static void OnMouseDoubleClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Control control = sender as Control;
ICommand command = (ICommand)control.GetValue(CommandProperty);
object commandParameter = control.GetValue(CommandParameterProperty);
command.Execute(commandParameter);
}
}
The problem I am facing with this is that it says that the 'ViewableTIADevice' is not an FrameWorkElement and thus I cannot even run it.
I've also tried using the
<Style TargetType"{x:Type TreeViewItem}">
That does run but I get no response when trying to double click an item in the TreeView.
I've searched a lot for the solution and I would like to refer to this thread: WPF/MVVM - how to handle double-click on TreeViewItems in the ViewModel?
I've been using the above thread as solution but how can I combine that solution with an HierarchicalDatatemplate?
EDIT
The ICommand that I am trying to call by double clicking an item
public RelayCommand TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick { get; set; }
Where I am here assigning it to the function
TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick = new RelayCommand(c => tiaDeviceTreeItemDoubleClick(c));
And the function it refers to:
private void tiaDeviceTreeItemDoubleClick(object value)
{
//code
}
This is the ViewableTIADevice class:
public class ViewableTIADevice
{
public ViewableTIADevice()
{
DeviceItems = new List<ViewableDeviceItem>();
}
public string DeviceName { get; set; }
public IList<ViewableDeviceItem> DeviceItems { get; set; }
}
i believe you have a missunderstanding of what your datacontext is, consider this example:
<TreeView ItemsSource="{Binding Items}">
<TreeView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ItemProperty1}"></TextBlock>
</DataTemplate>
</TreeView.ItemTemplate>
<TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="TreeViewItem">
<Setter Property="Local:MouseDoubleClick.Command"
Value="{Binding ElementName=DeviceTreeView, Path=DataContext.TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}"/>
<Setter Property="Local:MouseDoubleClick.CommandParameter"
Value="{Binding}"/>
</Style>
</TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
</TreeView>
the datacontext of my TreeView, is my viewmodel, so when i say ItemsSource="{Binding Items}", i am binding to the observable collection called Items inside my ViewModel.
the datacontext inside TreeView.ItemTemplate, is one single item inside the collection Items. meaning that when i say {Binding ItemProperty1}, i am binding, NOT to ViewModel.ItemProprty1, but to a single item inside the collection ViewModel.Items. this means that you have to have a ViewModel, and inside a collection called Items, and inside this collection you need to have objects of type X, and the class X must have a property called ItemProperty1.
the datacontext inside the TreeView.ItemContainerStyle, is also one single item inside the collection Items, meaning that when you say {Binding TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}, you are trying to bind to an ICommand property that is inside of the class that is inside your collection Items. your datacontext here, is not, as you assumed, your ViewModel, but rather one single item inside ViewModel.Items
so when you use this:
Value="{Binding ElementName=DeviceTreeView, Path=DataContext.TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}"
you are binding to the datacontext of the TreeView, which is ViewModel, which contains an ICommand property called TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick.
when you write this:
{Binding TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}
you are trying to bind to the datacontext of the current TreeViewItem, which is one single object inside your collection Items. so this will only work if you add the ICommand to your class that is inside your collection Items.
you also use this:
<Setter Property="Local:MouseDoubleClick.CommandParameter"
Value="{Binding}"
here, obviosly, you are sending one single item inside your collection Items, and not the ViewModel.
make sense?
I need both operating by mouse clicking and operating by hotkeys in my WPF application. User's actions affects on both data and appearance of application controls.
For example, the following app will send data to tea machine. You can select the tea brand, type (hot or cold) and optional ingredients: milk, lemon and syrup.
Not good from the point of view of UI design, but just example:
If to click the dropdown menu or input Ctrl+B, the list of select options will appear.
If to click the "Hot" button on input Ctrl+T, button becomes blue and text becomes "Cold". If to click or input Ctrl+T again, button becomes orange and text becomes to "Hot" again.
If to click optional ingredient button or input respective shortcut, button's background and text becomes gray (it means "unselected"). Same action will return the respective button to active state.
If don't use MVVM and don't define shortcuts, the logic will be relatively simple:
Tea tea = new Tea(); // Assume that default settings avalible
private void ToggleTeaType(object sender, EventArgs e){
// Change Data
if(tea.getType().Equals("Hot")){
tea.setType("Cold");
}
else{
tea.setType("Hot");
}
// Change Button Appearence
ChangeTeaTypeButtonAppearence(sender, e);
}
private void ChangeTeaTypeButtonAppearence(object sender, EventArgs e){
Button clickedButton = sender as Button;
Style hotTeaButtonStyle = this.FindResource("TeaTypeButtonHot") as Style;
Style coldTeaButtonStyle = this.FindResource("TeaTypeButtonCold") as Style;
if (clickedButton.Tag.Equals("Hot")) {
clickedButton.Style = coldTeaButtonStyle; // includes Tag declaration
clickedButton.Content = "Cold";
}
else (clickedButton.Tag.Equals("Cold")) {
clickedButton.Style = hotTeaButtonStyle; // includes Tag declaration
clickedButton.Content = "Hot";
}
}
// similarly for ingredients toggles
XAML:
<Button Content="Hot"
Tag="Hot"
Click="ToggleTeaType"
Style="{StaticResource TeaTypeButtonHot}"/>
<Button Content="Milk"
Tag="True"
Click="ToggleMilk"
Style="{StaticResource IngredientButtonTrue}"/>
<Button Content="Lemon"
Tag="True"
Click="ToggleLemon"
Style="{StaticResource IngredientButtonTrue}"/>
<Button Content="Syrup"
Tag="True"
Click="ToggleSyrup"
Style="{StaticResource IngredientButtonTrue}"/>
I changed my similar WPF project to MVVM because thanks to commands it's simple to assign the shortcuts:
<Window.InputBindings>
<KeyBinding Gesture="Ctrl+T" Command="{Binding ToggleTeaType}" />
</Window.InputBindings>
However, now it's a problem how to set the control's appearance. The following code is invalid:
private RelayCommand toggleTeaType;
public RelayCommand ToggleTeaType {
// change data by MVVM methods...
// change appearence:
ChangeTeaTypeButtonAppearence(object sender, EventArgs e);
}
I need the Relay Commands because I can bind it to both buttons and shortcuts, but how I can access to View controls from RelayCommand?
You should keep the viewmodel clean of view specific behavior. The viewmodel should just provide an interface for all relevant settings, it could look similar to the following (BaseViewModel would contain some helper methods to implement INotifyPropertyChanged etc.):
public class TeaConfigurationViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
public TeaConfigurationViewModel()
{
_TeaNames = new string[]
{
"Lipton",
"Generic",
"Misc",
};
}
private IEnumerable<string> _TeaNames;
public IEnumerable<string> TeaNames
{
get { return _TeaNames; }
}
private string _SelectedTea;
public string SelectedTea
{
get { return _SelectedTea; }
set { SetProperty(ref _SelectedTea, value); }
}
private bool _IsHotTea;
public bool IsHotTea
{
get { return _IsHotTea; }
set { SetProperty(ref _IsHotTea, value); }
}
private bool _WithMilk;
public bool WithMilk
{
get { return _WithMilk; }
set { SetProperty(ref _WithMilk, value); }
}
private bool _WithLemon;
public bool WithLemon
{
get { return _WithLemon; }
set { SetProperty(ref _WithLemon, value); }
}
private bool _WithSyrup;
public bool WithSyrup
{
get { return _WithSyrup; }
set { SetProperty(ref _WithSyrup, value); }
}
}
As you see, there is a property for each setting, but the viewmodel doesn't care about how the property is assigned.
So lets build some UI. For the following example, generally suppose xmlns:local points to your project namespace.
I suggest utilizing a customized ToggleButton for your purpose:
public class MyToggleButton : ToggleButton
{
static MyToggleButton()
{
MyToggleButton.DefaultStyleKeyProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(MyToggleButton), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(typeof(MyToggleButton)));
}
public Brush ToggledBackground
{
get { return (Brush)GetValue(ToggledBackgroundProperty); }
set { SetValue(ToggledBackgroundProperty, value); }
}
// Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for ToggledBackground. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc...
public static readonly DependencyProperty ToggledBackgroundProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ToggledBackground", typeof(Brush), typeof(MyToggleButton), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata());
}
And in Themes/Generic.xaml:
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:MyToggleButton}" BasedOn="{StaticResource {x:Type ToggleButton}}">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type local:MyToggleButton}">
<Border x:Name="border1" BorderBrush="Gray" BorderThickness="1" Background="{TemplateBinding Background}" Padding="5">
<ContentPresenter HorizontalAlignment="{TemplateBinding HorizontalContentAlignment}" VerticalAlignment="{TemplateBinding VerticalContentAlignment}"/>
</Border>
<ControlTemplate.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsChecked" Value="True">
<Setter TargetName="border1" Property="Background" Value="{Binding ToggledBackground,RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}}"/>
</Trigger>
</ControlTemplate.Triggers>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
Now, build the actual window content using this toggle button. This is just a rough sketch of your desired UI, containing only the functional controls without labels and explanation:
<Grid x:Name="grid1">
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<ComboBox
x:Name="cb1"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
IsEditable="True"
Margin="20"
MinWidth="200"
ItemsSource="{Binding TeaNames}"
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedTea}">
</ComboBox>
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="hotToggle"
IsChecked="{Binding IsHotTea}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="AliceBlue" ToggledBackground="Orange">
<local:MyToggleButton.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:MyToggleButton}">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="Cold"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsChecked" Value="True">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="Hot"/>
</Trigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</local:MyToggleButton.Style>
</local:MyToggleButton>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="milkToggle"
Content="Milk"
IsChecked="{Binding WithMilk}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="WhiteSmoke" ToggledBackground="LightGreen"/>
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="lemonToggle"
Content="Lemon"
IsChecked="{Binding WithLemon}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="WhiteSmoke" ToggledBackground="LightGreen"/>
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="syrupToggle"
Content="Syrup"
IsChecked="{Binding WithSyrup}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="WhiteSmoke" ToggledBackground="LightGreen"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
Notice the style trigger to change the button content between Hot and Cold.
Initialize the datacontext somewhere (eg. in the window constructor)
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
grid1.DataContext = new TeaConfigurationViewModel();
}
At this point, you have a fully functional UI, it will work with the default mouse and keyboard input methods, but it won't yet support your shortcut keys.
So lets add the keyboard shortcuts without destroying the already-working UI. One approach is, to create and use some custom commands:
public static class AutomationCommands
{
public static RoutedCommand OpenList = new RoutedCommand("OpenList", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.B, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleHot = new RoutedCommand("ToggleHot", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.T, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleMilk = new RoutedCommand("ToggleMilk", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.M, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleLemon = new RoutedCommand("ToggleLemon", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.L, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleSyrup = new RoutedCommand("ToggleSyrup", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.S, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
}
You can then bind those commands to appropriate actions in your main window:
<Window.CommandBindings>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.OpenList" Executed="OpenList_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleHot" Executed="ToggleHot_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleMilk" Executed="ToggleMilk_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleLemon" Executed="ToggleLemon_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleSyrup" Executed="ToggleSyrup_Executed"/>
</Window.CommandBindings>
and implement the appropriate handler method for each shortcut in the window code behind:
private void OpenList_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
FocusManager.SetFocusedElement(cb1, cb1);
cb1.IsDropDownOpen = true;
}
private void ToggleHot_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
hotToggle.IsChecked = !hotToggle.IsChecked;
}
private void ToggleMilk_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
milkToggle.IsChecked = !milkToggle.IsChecked;
}
private void ToggleLemon_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
lemonToggle.IsChecked = !lemonToggle.IsChecked;
}
private void ToggleSyrup_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
syrupToggle.IsChecked = !syrupToggle.IsChecked;
}
Again, remember this whole input binding thing is purely UI related, it is just an alternative way to change the displayed properties and the changes will be transferred to the viewmodel with the same binding as if the user clicks the button by mouse. There is no reason to carry such things into the viewmodel.
how I can access to View controls from RelayCommand?
You shouldn't. The whole point of MVVM (arguably) is to separate concerns. The 'state' that the ViewModel contains is rendered by the View (controls). The ViewModel/logic should never directly adjust the view - as this breaks the separation of concerns and closely couples the logic to the rendering.
What you need is for the view to render how it wants to display the state in the View Model.
Typically, this is done by bindings. As example: Rather than the ViewModel grabbing a text box reference and setting the string: myTextBox.SetText("some value"), we have the view bind to the property MyText in the view model.
It's the view's responsibility to decide how to show things on the screen.
That's all well and good, but how? I suggest, if you want to do this change using styles like you describe, I'd try using a converter that converts the using a binding to ViewModel state (Say, an enum property Hot or Cold):
<Button Content="Hot"
Tag="Hot"
Click="ToggleTeaType"
Style="{Binding TeaType, Converter={StaticResource TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter}}"/>
Note, we're using WPF's bindings. The only reference we've got tot he view model is through it's property TeaType.
Defined in your static resources, we have the converter:
<ResourceDictionary>
<Style x:Key="HotTeaStyle"/>
<Style x:Key="ColdTeaStyle"/>
<local:TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter
x:Key="TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter"
HotStateStyle="{StaticResource HotTeaStyle}"
ColdStateStyle="{StaticResource ColdTeaStyle}"/>
</ResourceDictionary>
And have the logic for converting from the TeaType enum to a Style in this:
public enum TeaType
{
Hot, Cold
}
class TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter : IValueConverter
{
public Style HotStateStyle { get; set; }
public Style ColdStateStyle { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
TeaType teaType = (TeaType)value;
if (teaType == TeaType.Hot)
{
return HotStateStyle;
}
else if (teaType == TeaType.Cold)
{
return ColdStateStyle;
}
return null;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
It could be made more generic and re-usable.
You should also take a look at toggle buttons, they deal with this kind of thing internally.
OK, a definite newbie here with WPF, and obviously need to keep learning more about MVVM, my code wasn't specifically designed that way, but I did designate one class to be the interface and controller for the GUI, whereas the model code resides in another set of classes. Have been scouring the web for examples, and questions similar to mine, of which there are plenty, but after three days of running through the maze I'm asking for help.
What I need is a simple dropdown menu, with items that can be dynamically updated (its an app that talks to a USB device, so however many are available should show up along with their device ID and serial number), and the currently selected item should show up on the Button (or whatever implementation of Dropdown menu I end up with). In this example, I just create a static list but that same list would be dynamically updated later on in the full app.
What I have so far looks like it is on the right track: I get the currently selected device id string to show up on the Button, and on pushing the Button, I get the list of all available devices (it doesn't bother me much that the currently selected device shows up redundantly in the list). However, I am not able to hook into any event when an item is selected, and thus can't update the item in the button, or do anything else for that matter.
My XAML below. Note that this was roughly hacked together, and there are some things in here that make no sense, like "IsActive" for the "IsChecked" property, that came from examples. The big problem is that as far as I can tell, none of the Setter properties in the ContextMenu.Resources seem to be doing anything at all...tried changing the fontsize to no avail. And the really big problem, of course, is that the "MyCommand" binding isn't working, that method never gets called.
<Label Content="Device Selected:" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="25,22,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="124" FontWeight="Bold" FontSize="14" Height="25"/>
<Button x:Name="DeviceSelMenuButton" Content="{Binding DeviceID_and_SN, Mode=TwoWay}" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Height="28" Margin="25,52,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="187" FontSize="14" Click="DeviceSelMenuButton_Click">
<Button.ContextMenu>
<ContextMenu ItemsSource="{Binding DeviceID_SN_Collection, Mode=TwoWay}">
<ContextMenu.Resources>
<Style x:Key="SelectDeviceStyle" TargetType="MenuItem">
<Setter Property="Command" Value="{Binding MyCommand}"/>
<Setter Property="CommandTarget" Value="{Binding RelativeSource Self}"/>
<Setter Property="IsChecked" Value="{Binding IsActive}"/>
<Setter Property="IsCheckable" Value="True"/>
<Setter Property="FontSize" Value="14"/>
</Style>
</ContextMenu.Resources>
</ContextMenu>
</Button.ContextMenu>
</Button>
And the code from MainWindow.xaml.cs:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
CustomDeviceGUI _customDeviceGui = new CustomDeviceGUI();
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = _customDeviceGui;
}
private void DeviceSelMenuButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
// " (sender as Button)" is PlacementTarget
(sender as Button).ContextMenu.IsEnabled = true;
(sender as Button).ContextMenu.PlacementTarget = (sender as Button);
(sender as Button).ContextMenu.Placement = System.Windows.Controls.Primitives.PlacementMode.Bottom;
(sender as Button).ContextMenu.IsOpen = true;
}
private void SomeMethod(object sender, DataTransferEventArgs e)
{
// TODO Somehow get the index of the selected menu item (collection index, 0-based)
// int selIndex = (sender as Button).ContextMenu.Items.IndexOf ??
_customDeviceGui.UpdateDeviceID("RelayPro id updated");
}
}
And the GUI code:
class CustomDeviceGUI : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
// Declare the event
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged = delegate { };
private string _deviceDisplayString;
private ICommand _updateMenu;
List<string> ControllerDeviceList = new List<string>();
private System.Collections.ObjectModel.ObservableCollection<string> _DeviceID_SN_Collection = new System.Collections.ObjectModel.ObservableCollection<string>();
// CTOR
public CustomDeviceGUI()
{
ControllerDeviceList.Add("CustomDevice Device 1");
ControllerDeviceList.Add("CustomDevice Device 2");
ControllerDeviceList.Add("CustomDevice Device 3");
ControllerDeviceList.Add("CustomDevice Device 6");
UpdateDeviceID(ControllerDeviceList[0]);
}
#region CustomDeviceGUI Properties
public System.Collections.ObjectModel.ObservableCollection<string> DeviceID_SN_Collection
{
get
{
_DeviceID_SN_Collection.Clear();
foreach (string str in ControllerDeviceList)
{
_DeviceID_SN_Collection.Add(str);
}
return _DeviceID_SN_Collection;
}
private set
{
_DeviceID_SN_Collection = value;
}
}
public string DeviceID_and_SN
{
get
{
return _deviceDisplayString;
}
private set
{
_deviceDisplayString = value;
}
}
public ICommand MyCommand
{
get
{
if (_updateMenu == null)
_updateMenu = new MyGuiCommand();
return _updateMenu;
}
}
#endregion
#region Public Methods
public void UpdateDeviceID(string deviceID)
{
this._deviceDisplayString = deviceID;
RaisePropertyChangeEvent("DeviceID_and_SN");
RaisePropertyChangeEvent("DeviceID_SN_Collection");
}
#endregion
protected void RaisePropertyChangeEvent(string name)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = this.PropertyChanged;
try
{
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// ... TODO Remove this catchall or find specific exceptions
}
}
public class MyGuiCommand : ICommand
{
public void Execute(object parameter)
{
// Debug.WriteLine("Hello, world");
int hmm = 3;
}
public bool CanExecute(object parameter)
{
return true;
}
public event EventHandler CanExecuteChanged // was ;
{
add { CommandManager.RequerySuggested += value; }
remove { CommandManager.RequerySuggested -= value; }
}
}
} // class CustomDeviceGUI
All the changes I had to make were in XAML. Primarily it was a matter of using the ancestor to get the right data context. I also switched to ContextMenu.ItemContainer instead of ContextMenu.Resources.
<ContextMenu.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="MenuItem">
<Setter Property="Command" Value="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Button}}, Path=DataContext.MyCommand}"/>
</Style>
</ContextMenu.ItemContainerStyle>
Eventough I'm not sure I think that the:
<Setter Property="Command" Value="{Binding MyCommand}"/>
binding needs a RoutedUICommand object.
EDIT:
Another thing that i have noticed is that you don't set any command bindings before. Like this:
<Window.CommandBindings>
<CommandBinding Command="MyCommand" Executed="Execute" />
</Window.CommandBindings>
just an example you can set CommandBindings to many others controls.
I'm using Avalondock 2.x for one of my open source projects, if a document is dirty when you close it you should be able to cancel the close.
I am using Caliburn Micro and Coroutine, only way I have been able to solve it is to use C.M to attach to the event
<i:EventTrigger EventName="DocumentClosing">
<cal:ActionMessage MethodName="DocumentClosing">
<cal:Parameter Value="$documentcontext" />
<cal:Parameter Value="$eventArgs" />
</cal:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
The event arg has a cancel property. Problem with this approuch is thats its not very MVVM friendly, I have created a little helper method to Coroutinify this like
public IEnumerable<IResult> Coroutinify(IEnumerable<IResult> results, System.Action cancelCallback)
{
return results.Select(r =>
{
if (r is CancelResult)
cancelCallback();
return r;
});
}
Used like
public IEnumerable<IResult> DocumentClosing(ScriptEditorViewModel document, DocumentClosingEventArgs e)
{
return Result.Coroutinify(HandleScriptClosing(document), () => e.Cancel = true);
}
This works but it's a bit clumsy etc, is there a more MVVM way of closing documents in Avalondock with cancel ability?
edit: source code
https://github.com/AndersMalmgren/FreePIE/blob/master/FreePIE.GUI/Shells/MainShellView.xaml#L29
https://github.com/AndersMalmgren/FreePIE/blob/master/FreePIE.GUI/Shells/MainShellViewModel.cs#L110
https://github.com/AndersMalmgren/FreePIE/blob/master/FreePIE.GUI/Result/ResultFactory.cs#L49
The way I've accomplished this is by binding to the CloseCommand property of an AvalonDock LayoutItem. When this binding is associated, it overrides the default behavior of closing a document ('X' button, right click close / close all). You then are fully responsible for removing (closing) the document if desired.
The way I set it up was to have a DocumentManagerVM which contains an ObservableCollection of DocumentVMs. Each DocumentVM has an ICommand called RequestCloseCommand, which can close the document by removing itself from the collection of DocumentVMs it's owning DocumentManagerVM.
Specifically, in my DocumentVM viewmodel, there's an ICommand (I'm using mvvmLight RelayCommand) to perform the closing logic:
public RelayCommand RequestCloseCommand { get; private set; }
void RequestClose()
{
// if you want to prevent the document closing, just return from this function
// otherwise, close it by removing it from the collection of DocumentVMs
this.DocumentManagerVM.DocumentVMs.Remove(this);
}
In your view, set up your binding in the LayoutItemContainerStyle or LayoutItemContainerStyleSelector.
<ad:DockingManager
DataContext="{Binding DocumentManagerVM}"
DocumentsSource="{Binding DocumentVMs}">
<ad:DockingManager.LayoutItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ad:LayoutItem}">
<Setter Property="Title" Value="{Binding Model.Header}"/>
<Setter Property="CloseCommand" Value="{Binding Model.RequestCloseCommand}"/>
</Style>
</ad:DockingManager.LayoutItemContainerStyle>
</ad:DockingManager>
I added a Dependency Property to the DockingManger, that allows binding to a Close Command:
public static class DocumentClosingBehavior
{
#region Dependecy Property
private static readonly DependencyProperty DocumentClosingCommandProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached
(
"DocumentClosingCommand",
typeof(ICommand),
typeof(DocumentClosingBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata(DocumentClosingCommandPropertyChangedCallBack)
);
#endregion
#region Methods
public static void SetDocumentClosingCommand(this UIElement inUIElement, ICommand inCommand)
{
inUIElement.SetValue(DocumentClosingCommandProperty, inCommand);
}
private static ICommand GetDocumentClosingCommand(UIElement inUIElement)
{
return (ICommand)inUIElement.GetValue(DocumentClosingCommandProperty);
}
#endregion
#region CallBack Method
private static void DocumentClosingCommandPropertyChangedCallBack(DependencyObject inDependencyObject, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs inEventArgs)
{
DockingManager uiElement = inDependencyObject as DockingManager;
if (null == uiElement) return;
uiElement.DocumentClosing += (sender, args) =>
{
GetDocumentClosingCommand(uiElement).Execute(args);
};
}
#endregion
}
In XAML:
<xcad:DockingManager vm:DocumentClosingBehavior.DocumentClosingCommand="{Binding DocumentCloseCommand}" Grid.Row="2"
AllowMixedOrientation="True"
BorderBrush="Black"
BorderThickness="1"
Theme="{Binding ElementName=_themeCombo, Path=SelectedItem.Tag}"
DocumentsSource="{Binding Documents}"
ActiveContent="{Binding ActiveDocument, Mode=TwoWay, Converter={StaticResource ActiveDocumentConverter}}"
>
In my MainViewModel I define an ICommand DocumentCloseCommand.
I have a canvas, e.g. similar to this solution or many others using the ItemsControl.
Now I want a button which should be bound to an ICommand. This command should call a method of ViewModel class which can save the image.
The saving method is clear, but how do I do the binding following the MVVM pattern?
You could pass the Canvas to the ViewModel's Save method using a CommandParameter
<Button Content="Save"
Command="{Binding SaveCanvasCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding ElenementName=myCanvas}" ?>
<Canvas x:Name="myCanvas">
<!-- Stuff to save -->
</Canvas>
And somewhere in you ViewModel or Command you'd have
void SaveCanvasCommandExecute(object parameter)
{
UIElement toSave = (UIElement)parameter;
//.. You'd probably use RenderTargetBitmap here to save toSave.
}
If you don't want to reference UI elements in your ViewModel you could use an attached behaviour:
internal static class Behaviours
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty SaveCanvasProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("SaveCanvas", typeof(bool), typeof(Behaviours),
new UIPropertyMetadata(false, OnSaveCanvas));
public static void SetSaveCanvas(DependencyObject obj, bool value)
{
obj.SetValue(SaveCanvasProperty, value);
}
public static bool GetSaveCanvas(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (bool)obj.GetValue(SaveCanvasProperty);
}
private static void OnSaveCanvas(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if ((bool)e.NewValue)
{
// Save code.....
}
}
}
Then in your ViewModel you have your Command that sets a property, also on your ViewModel:
public ICommand SaveCanvasCommand
{
get
{
if (_saveCanvasCommand == null)
_saveCanvasCommand = new RelayCommand(() => { IsSaveCanvas = true; });
return _saveCanvasCommand;
}
}
And the property which is bound to your View:
public bool IsSaveCanvas
{
get { return _isSaveCanvas; }
set
{
_isSaveCanvas = value;
RaisePropertyChanged("IsSaveCanvas");
}
}
Then hooking it all up in the Xaml looks like this:
Add a Trigger on the Control that binds the value of your ViewModel property to your attached behaviour:
<UserControl.Style>
<Style>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding IsSaveCanvas}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="wpfApplication1:Behaviours.SaveCanvas" Value="True"/>
</DataTrigger>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding IsSaveCanvas}" Value="False">
<Setter Property="wpfApplication1:Behaviours.SaveCanvas" Value="False"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</UserControl.Style>
And then bind your Button / MenuItem to the ViewModels Save Command:
<Canvas.ContextMenu>
<MenuItem Header="Save" Command="{Binding SaveCanvasCommand}"/>
</Canvas.ContextMenu>