Simple regex not working in c# - c#

/news/article-title.html
is not being caught by the regex:
^/news/[^(archives)].+.html
?
I'm trying to have articles that do NOT have "archives" in the filename, but start with "/news/"
Thanks!

You should use a negative lookahead. Character classes only work for a single character. Also, don't forget to escape the dot.
If "archives" cannot be at the beginning:
^/news/(?!archives).+\.html
If "archives" cannot anywhere:
^/news/((?!archives).)+\.html
More tips:
Disallow archives as a whole word: (?!archives\b).+ or (?!archives-).+
make sure \.html is at the end (it may appear more than once): \.html(?=$|[?&])

You can't use the not of a character block to not an entire string.
[^(archives)]
This is interpreted as a character that is not one of the following: (, a, r, c, h, i, v, e, s or ).

Related

How to find two consecutive repeating characters in RGB using Regex?

I am trying to find all RGB numbers, that have 2x3 consecutive numbers. By that, I mean this sort of numbers:
\#00FF11
\#66AA44
\#FF0000
I have tried writing this:
\b#(([0-9a-zA-Z])\1){3}\b
but that doesn't work.
Where is the problem? I would probably say, that the problem is somewhere around the \1, because it's the only part I am not so sure about.
The \1 pattern is a backreference to the Capturing group 1, i.e. (([0-9a-zA-Z])\1). You actually want to refer to Capturing group 2 and thus need \2 instead of \1.
Note that \b# will only match # that is preceded with a word char (letter, digit or _). You need to use a non-word boundary at the start, \B.
To match hex chars, [A-Fa-f] is preferable rather than [A-Za-z].
Use
#"\B#(?:([0-9a-fA-F])\1){3}\b"
Using the verbatim string literal, you do not need to double escape backslashes here.

Get what is in string from one quotation mark to other [duplicate]

I have a value like this:
"Foo Bar" "Another Value" something else
What regex will return the values enclosed in the quotation marks (e.g. Foo Bar and Another Value)?
In general, the following regular expression fragment is what you are looking for:
"(.*?)"
This uses the non-greedy *? operator to capture everything up to but not including the next double quote. Then, you use a language-specific mechanism to extract the matched text.
In Python, you could do:
>>> import re
>>> string = '"Foo Bar" "Another Value"'
>>> print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"', string)
['Foo Bar', 'Another Value']
I've been using the following with great success:
(["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1
It supports nested quotes as well.
For those who want a deeper explanation of how this works, here's an explanation from user ephemient:
([""']) match a quote; ((?=(\\?))\2.) if backslash exists, gobble it, and whether or not that happens, match a character; *? match many times (non-greedily, as to not eat the closing quote); \1 match the same quote that was use for opening.
I would go for:
"([^"]*)"
The [^"] is regex for any character except '"'
The reason I use this over the non greedy many operator is that I have to keep looking that up just to make sure I get it correct.
Lets see two efficient ways that deal with escaped quotes. These patterns are not designed to be concise nor aesthetic, but to be efficient.
These ways use the first character discrimination to quickly find quotes in the string without the cost of an alternation. (The idea is to discard quickly characters that are not quotes without to test the two branches of the alternation.)
Content between quotes is described with an unrolled loop (instead of a repeated alternation) to be more efficient too: [^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*
Obviously to deal with strings that haven't balanced quotes, you can use possessive quantifiers instead: [^"\\]*+(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*+ or a workaround to emulate them, to prevent too much backtracking. You can choose too that a quoted part can be an opening quote until the next (non-escaped) quote or the end of the string. In this case there is no need to use possessive quantifiers, you only need to make the last quote optional.
Notice: sometimes quotes are not escaped with a backslash but by repeating the quote. In this case the content subpattern looks like this: [^"]*(?:""[^"]*)*
The patterns avoid the use of a capture group and a backreference (I mean something like (["']).....\1) and use a simple alternation but with ["'] at the beginning, in factor.
Perl like:
["'](?:(?<=")[^"\\]*(?s:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(?<=')[^'\\]*(?s:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
(note that (?s:...) is a syntactic sugar to switch on the dotall/singleline mode inside the non-capturing group. If this syntax is not supported you can easily switch this mode on for all the pattern or replace the dot with [\s\S])
(The way this pattern is written is totally "hand-driven" and doesn't take account of eventual engine internal optimizations)
ECMA script:
(?=["'])(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^'\\]*)*')
POSIX extended:
"[^"\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^'\\]*)*'
or simply:
"([^"\\]|\\.|\\\n)*"|'([^'\\]|\\.|\\\n)*'
Peculiarly, none of these answers produce a regex where the returned match is the text inside the quotes, which is what is asked for. MA-Madden tries but only gets the inside match as a captured group rather than the whole match. One way to actually do it would be :
(?<=(["']\b))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)
Examples for this can be seen in this demo https://regex101.com/r/Hbj8aP/1
The key here is the the positive lookbehind at the start (the ?<= ) and the positive lookahead at the end (the ?=). The lookbehind is looking behind the current character to check for a quote, if found then start from there and then the lookahead is checking the character ahead for a quote and if found stop on that character. The lookbehind group (the ["']) is wrapped in brackets to create a group for whichever quote was found at the start, this is then used at the end lookahead (?=\1) to make sure it only stops when it finds the corresponding quote.
The only other complication is that because the lookahead doesn't actually consume the end quote, it will be found again by the starting lookbehind which causes text between ending and starting quotes on the same line to be matched. Putting a word boundary on the opening quote (["']\b) helps with this, though ideally I'd like to move past the lookahead but I don't think that is possible. The bit allowing escaped characters in the middle I've taken directly from Adam's answer.
The RegEx of accepted answer returns the values including their sourrounding quotation marks: "Foo Bar" and "Another Value" as matches.
Here are RegEx which return only the values between quotation marks (as the questioner was asking for):
Double quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
"(.*?[^\\])"
Single quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
'(.*?[^\\])'
Both (use value of capture group #2):
(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1
-
All support escaped and nested quotes.
I liked Eugen Mihailescu's solution to match the content between quotes whilst allowing to escape quotes. However, I discovered some problems with escaping and came up with the following regex to fix them:
(['"])(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*\1
It does the trick and is still pretty simple and easy to maintain.
Demo (with some more test-cases; feel free to use it and expand on it).
PS: If you just want the content between quotes in the full match ($0), and are not afraid of the performance penalty use:
(?<=(['"])\b)(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*(?=\1)
Unfortunately, without the quotes as anchors, I had to add a boundary \b which does not play well with spaces and non-word boundary characters after the starting quote.
Alternatively, modify the initial version by simply adding a group and extract the string form $2:
(['"])((?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*)\1
PPS: If your focus is solely on efficiency, go with Casimir et Hippolyte's solution; it's a good one.
A very late answer, but like to answer
(\"[\w\s]+\")
http://regex101.com/r/cB0kB8/1
The pattern (["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1 above does the job but I am concerned of its performances (it's not bad but could be better). Mine below it's ~20% faster.
The pattern "(.*?)" is just incomplete. My advice for everyone reading this is just DON'T USE IT!!!
For instance it cannot capture many strings (if needed I can provide an exhaustive test-case) like the one below:
$string = 'How are you? I\'m fine, thank you';
The rest of them are just as "good" as the one above.
If you really care both about performance and precision then start with the one below:
/(['"])((\\\1|.)*?)\1/gm
In my tests it covered every string I met but if you find something that doesn't work I would gladly update it for you.
Check my pattern in an online regex tester.
This version
accounts for escaped quotes
controls backtracking
/(["'])((?:(?!\1)[^\\]|(?:\\\\)*\\[^\\])*)\1/
MORE ANSWERS! Here is the solution i used
\"([^\"]*?icon[^\"]*?)\"
TLDR;
replace the word icon with what your looking for in said quotes and voila!
The way this works is it looks for the keyword and doesn't care what else in between the quotes.
EG:
id="fb-icon"
id="icon-close"
id="large-icon-close"
the regex looks for a quote mark "
then it looks for any possible group of letters thats not "
until it finds icon
and any possible group of letters that is not "
it then looks for a closing "
I liked Axeman's more expansive version, but had some trouble with it (it didn't match for example
foo "string \\ string" bar
or
foo "string1" bar "string2"
correctly, so I tried to fix it:
# opening quote
(["'])
(
# repeat (non-greedy, so we don't span multiple strings)
(?:
# anything, except not the opening quote, and not
# a backslash, which are handled separately.
(?!\1)[^\\]
|
# consume any double backslash (unnecessary?)
(?:\\\\)*
|
# Allow backslash to escape characters
\\.
)*?
)
# same character as opening quote
\1
string = "\" foo bar\" \"loloo\""
print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"',string)
just try this out , works like a charm !!!
\ indicates skip character
Unlike Adam's answer, I have a simple but worked one:
(["'])(?:\\\1|.)*?\1
And just add parenthesis if you want to get content in quotes like this:
(["'])((?:\\\1|.)*?)\1
Then $1 matches quote char and $2 matches content string.
All the answer above are good.... except they DOES NOT support all the unicode characters! at ECMA Script (Javascript)
If you are a Node users, you might want the the modified version of accepted answer that support all unicode characters :
/(?<=((?<=[\s,.:;"']|^)["']))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)/gmu
Try here.
My solution to this is below
(["']).*\1(?![^\s])
Demo link : https://regex101.com/r/jlhQhV/1
Explanation:
(["'])-> Matches to either ' or " and store it in the backreference \1 once the match found
.* -> Greedy approach to continue matching everything zero or more times until it encounters ' or " at end of the string. After encountering such state, regex engine backtrack to previous matching character and here regex is over and will move to next regex.
\1 -> Matches to the character or string that have been matched earlier with the first capture group.
(?![^\s]) -> Negative lookahead to ensure there should not any non space character after the previous match
echo 'junk "Foo Bar" not empty one "" this "but this" and this neither' | sed 's/[^\"]*\"\([^\"]*\)\"[^\"]*/>\1</g'
This will result in: >Foo Bar<><>but this<
Here I showed the result string between ><'s for clarity, also using the non-greedy version with this sed command we first throw out the junk before and after that ""'s and then replace this with the part between the ""'s and surround this by ><'s.
From Greg H. I was able to create this regex to suit my needs.
I needed to match a specific value that was qualified by being inside quotes. It must be a full match, no partial matching could should trigger a hit
e.g. "test" could not match for "test2".
reg = r"""(['"])(%s)\1"""
if re.search(reg%(needle), haystack, re.IGNORECASE):
print "winning..."
Hunter
If you're trying to find strings that only have a certain suffix, such as dot syntax, you can try this:
\"([^\"]*?[^\"]*?)\".localized
Where .localized is the suffix.
Example:
print("this is something I need to return".localized + "so is this".localized + "but this is not")
It will capture "this is something I need to return".localized and "so is this".localized but not "but this is not".
A supplementary answer for the subset of Microsoft VBA coders only one uses the library Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5 and this gives the following code
Sub TestRegularExpression()
Dim oRE As VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp '* Tools->References: Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5
Set oRE = New VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp
oRE.Pattern = """([^""]*)"""
oRE.Global = True
Dim sTest As String
sTest = """Foo Bar"" ""Another Value"" something else"
Debug.Assert oRE.test(sTest)
Dim oMatchCol As VBScript_RegExp_55.MatchCollection
Set oMatchCol = oRE.Execute(sTest)
Debug.Assert oMatchCol.Count = 2
Dim oMatch As Match
For Each oMatch In oMatchCol
Debug.Print oMatch.SubMatches(0)
Next oMatch
End Sub

Extract string from a pattern preceded by any length

I'm looking for a regular expression to extract a string from a file name
eg if filename format is "anythingatallanylength_123_TESTNAME.docx", I'm interested in extracting "TESTNAME" ... probably fixed length of 8. (btw, 123 can be any three digit number)
I think I can use regex match ...
".*_[0-9][0-9][0-9]_[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].docx$"
However this matches the whole thing. How can I just get "TESTNAME"?
Thanks
Use parenthesis to match a specific piece of the whole regex.
You can also use the curly braces to specify counts of matching characters, and \d for [0-9].
In C#:
var myRegex = new Regex(#"*._\d{3}_([A-Za-z]{8})\.docx$");
Now "TESTNAME" or whatever your 8 letter piece is will be found in the captures collection of your regex after using it.
Also note, there will be a performance overhead for look-ahead and look-behind, as presented in some other solutions.
You can use a look-behind and a look-ahead to check parts without matching them:
(?<=_[0-9]{3}_)[A-Z]{8}(?=\.docx$)
Note that this is case-sensitive, you may want to use other character classes and/or quantifiers to fit your exact pattern.
In your file name format "anythingatallanylength_123_TESTNAME.docx", the pattern you are trying to match is a string before .docx and the underscore _. Keeping the thing in mind that any _ before doesn't get matched I came up with following solution.
Regex: (?<=_)[A-Za-z]*(?=\.docx$)
Flags used:
g global search
m multi-line search.
Explanation:
(?<=_) checks if there is an underscore before the file name.
(?=\.docx$) checks for extension at the end.
[A-Za-z]* checks the required match.
Regex101 Demo
Thanks to #Lucero #noob #JamesFaix I came up with ...
#"(?<=.*[0-9]{3})[A-Z]{8}(?=.docx$)"
So a look behind (in brackets, starting with ?<=) for anything (ie zero or more any char (denoted by "." ) followed by an underscore, followed by thee numerics, followed by underscore. Thats the end of the look behind. Now to match what I need (eight letters). Finally, the look ahead (in brackets, starting with ?=), which is the .docx
Nice work, fellas. Thunderbirds are go.

File.delete not working for 'directorya\directoryb'

I want to create some function which export report to excel file,
but when I try to delete temp data it's not working.
File.Delete(tempFileName);
I try to messagebox 'tempFileName' it's correct
D:\test\bin\Debug\temptemp1.xls
then I try to test manually delete it
File.Delete("D:\test\bin\Debug\temptemp1.xls");
it's give error result 'unrecognized escape sequence';
I try to change it like this
File.Delete("D:/test/bin/Debug/temptemp1.xls");
and it's work smoothly
I see documentation File.Delete here
and it's using '\' not '/';
can anyone explain this to me?
(I use vs 2010 and .net 4 winform)
In a regular string constant, the \ character is an escape character so, if you want to include a literal backslash, you need to escape it (with itself):
File.Delete("D:\\test\\bin\\Debug\\temptemp1.xls");
Otherwise \t will become a tab, \b a backspace and \D give you your unrecognised escape sequence error.
Alternatively, you use a raw string to avoid all the complexities that come from escaping:
File.Delete(#"D:\test\bin\Debug\temptemp1.xls");
which doesn't do the escaping.
The reason that it works with the forward slash / is because Windows has, for a long time, been able to handle both styles (in the API, though not in the command interpreter cmd.exe).
Try..
File.Delete(#"D:\test\bin\Debug\temptemp1.xls");
OR...
File.Delete("D:\\test\\bin\Debug\\temptemp1.xls");
Backslash is a special character. As documented here...
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa691090(v=vs.71).aspx
A character that follows a backslash character () in a
regular-string-literal-character must be one of the following
characters: ', ", \, 0, a, b, f, n, r, t, u, U, x, v. Otherwise, a
compile-time error occurs.

Regular expressions to extract punctuations/characters

Hi guys I need a regex that only extracts punctuations/characters.
I have this so far :
[._^%$#!~#,-]+
but this works if there is at least 1 punctuations and still allows for any other char (digit or letter)
I need to to only allow punctuations/characters
Try this:
^[\p{S}\p{P}]+$
\p{S} matches any symbol character, and \p{P} matches any punctuation.
Note that your pattern will not match all the symbols and punctuations not present in the list.
Try anchoring the regex to the start and the end of the string (unless you're using Multiline matching) - i.e. ^ at the beginning and $ at the end:
^[._^%$#!~#,-]+$
Note - this does not endorse your actual pattern (I can't say whether this is matching all the 'special characters' you're talking about, but it will make it so that the entire string must be all 'special'.
[^a-zA-Z0-9]* u can try something like this. Should NOT accept those chars, cba to writte all beside chars beside one u typed.
\W
Matches any character that is not a word character (alphanumeric & underscore).

Categories