QuickFix C# or Python [closed] - c#

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
We are about to implement a small automated securities trader. The trader will be build on top of the excellent quickfix FIX engine.
After due though, we narrowed our options down to implementing it in C# or in Python. Please specify the pros and cons of each language for this task, in term of:
Performance (The fact that Python uses a GIL troubles me in terms of thread concurrency)
Productivity
Scalability (We may need to scale this trader to a fully-sized platform)
EDIT
I've rephrased the question to make it less "C# vs. Python" (which I find irrelevant - both languages have their merits), but I'm simply trying to draw a comparison table before I make the decision.

I like both languages and a think both would be a good choice. The GIL might really be the most important difference. But I'm not sure if it's a problem in your case. The GIL only affects code running in pure Python. I assume that your tool depends more on I/O than on raw number crunching. If your I/O libraries handle the GIL correctly, they can execute concurrent code without problems. And even for number crunching you still have numpy.
My choice would depend on your existing knowledge. If you have experienced C# developers at hand I would go for C#. If you start absolutly from scratch and it's really 50:50, then I would go for Python. It's easier to learn, free and in many cases more productive.
And just to mention it: You might also have a look at IronPython. ;-)

For points "Performance" and "Scalability" I would suggest C# (although a large part of performance depends on your algorithms). Productivity is much of a subjective thing, but now C# has all cool features like lambda, anonymous method, classes etc which makes it much more productive.

Related

Is there anything you can do in C++ that you cannot do in C#? [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 12 years ago.
I am trying to figure out if there is anything that you can do in c++ that you absolutely cannot do in c#?
I know that there are platforms that are targeted to native libraries, but I want to know if the lowest level c# can compare with the lowest level c++.
Device drivers. These applications operate in kernel mode, and .NET apps don't (they run in user mode). Even if you could, would you really want to? Probably not considering the overhead of the runtime and the relative difficulty of interfacing directly to hardware devices.
In software you can pretty much do anything given enough time and effort. It comes down to whether or not a certain task is practical rather than possible.
inline assembler
there are some very complex win32 signatures that cannot be used via p/invoke; the sspi security interfaces for example
Write Real Mode code. There is no CIL framework that runs in real mode, therefore C# cannot target it. C++ has been able to target real mode for decades now.
You can't use multiple inheritance in C# (Excluding interfaces).
In C++ you can overload more operators: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operators_in_C_and_C%2B%2B vs: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8edha89s%28v=VS.100%29.aspx
Well, C# handles all the memory management, so you're limited in terms of hands on memory management. This isn't really a bad thing though, as it takes a lot of work away from you as the coder. It becomes a bad thing if you're heavily concerned with performance (games and the likes).

Which language is most suitable for an efficient web-crawler? [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 12 years ago.
i need to write an web crawler and i need need which is best language for performance like memory and performance ..
Edit: Original title was "which language is optimized for speed and perfomance c++ or C#"
i need to write an web crawler
In that case, the internet traffic is probably your bottleneck, so the language does not matter at all.
I'd say that, if you know what you're doing, C++ is more likely to be efficient than C#.
On the flip side, C# is probably easier to work with and to optimize your app in.
So, since you have to ask, I recommend C# in your case. ;)
C++ virtually always offers the best performance of any language that supports modern programming techniques like generic programming and OOP. You pay a price for this though - it's substantially harder to use than C#.
Of course C++. You can manage every byte of memory there, while C# is Managed Code, where you tell the framework what you want to do and the framework does the things you usually do in C++. But if that's the main motive - don't stop at C++ and get right to machine code, Assembly.
A Google search would give you an instant answer - C++ is (generally) a better performing language.

Why aren't c# programmers drawn to ruby as java programmers are [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 12 years ago.
This is a trend I've noticed. There is a very large adoption of ruby from the java community. Is it that c# is such an awesome language + having good tools over java that most c# developers aren't as keen to switching to ruby permanently as java developers are?
What are your opinions?
C# is a modern, and quite powerful language, sporting:
Lambdas (closures)
Continuations (yield)
Value types
Properties
Type inference
Pass-by-reference
...just to name a few.
These features make a transition from C# to Ruby far less attractive than a transition from Java to Ruby.
Because .NET is part of a coherent environment which includes developer tools, database links, orm management GUI front ends, net front ends etc. etc.
Java is a language! There are losts of piecemeal bits and pieces which do all of the above, but, the quality varies considerably. From something like Apache POI which is a better interface to MS Office documents than MS provides to the abysmal J2EE stack which half does in a very complicated way what .NET does in a simple and elegant way.
Whereas for Enterprise level, millions of transactions, bullet proof, fast never lose your data all the extra work putting together J2EE, JDBC, Spring, Hibernate etc.etc. etc. is actually worth it, for a quick simple Web to Database app its just too painful, hence the attraction to ROR.
On the other hand while .NET can scale up to the big stuff (not as well as J2EE! ) it is still reasonably straightforward to do a small application.
I see two reasons:
It seems to me that the biggest benefits of switching to Ruby for a Java developer are closures and dynamic type inference. Both of these can be found in C#.
.NET benefits from a rather tight integration with the Windows platform - (COM interop, WPF, easy installation), making it more difficult to switch from .NET to something else.

Becoming a thread monkey [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
What would you suggest as a road map for becoming very proficient in writing multithreaded applications - beyond "tinkering"?
I am a C# developer - would branching off into some other languages help this endeavor?
Does the parallel addition to .NET 4.0 hide things that you should know in order to make it easier?
Read Joe Duffy's "Concurrent Programming on Windows". Joe is an amazing expert.
Investigate different approaches to concurrency on different platforms; look at Erlang, Scala etc
Likewise read Java concurrency books, which will have some subtly different details, but often tackle the same core issues and have some useful patterns. "Java Concurrency in Practice" is often recommended.
Look at the various options on .NET, including the Coordination and Concurrency Runtime and F# asynchronous computations
Definitely learn Parallel Extensions - it'll help a lot, and from what I've seen, a lot of very careful design work has gone into it. (It's changing somewhat for 4.0b2 though, so you may want to defer this for now.)
Theres a really good PDF about threading in .NET here the MSDN documentation for the Thread class as well as the threading primitives (Mutex, WaitHandle, ReaderWriterLockSlim et al) is also good reading.
The key things to understand are:
When to use a thread
When not to use threads
How to manage sharing state between threads.
I could go on to explain these here, but I feel the threading PDF linked to above does a far better job than I could in that respect, the key point is that threads are a powerful tool and understanding when and how to use them will make you more proficient in their use than simply reading MSDN, although strategies for using threads effectively are covered there also.

Starting Intermediate Level C# Class, with heavy focus on UML... Your best tips or experinced advice? [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
I'm starting my 2nd class in C# programming through Kaplan online school. I have some limited interaction with the professor and the class online, but nothing like in an actual school. I'm about to go through "Modern Software Development Using C#.NET" by Richard Wiener. It seems the book as a extremely heavy focus on UML (which I don't even really know what that is right now!)
You experinced Csharpers.... any tips to keep in mind as I go through this to keep in perspective how the modern software engineer works outside the classroom?
Any perspectives to share as I start understanding UML and intermediate C# programming?
Some companies will use UML everywhere. Some use it nowhere. I'm not a big fan myself - I prefer ad-hoc diagrams and plenty of other communication (notes on the diagram, actual talking etc).
The good thing about an ad-hoc approach is that you can leave it as vague as you like or make it really detailed. The bad thing about it is you can't generate any code from it - but I've never really liked generating code from UML. (Others swear by it, mind.)
You certainly don't need to know UML to learn C#.
UML would come very close to the end of the list of things that gave me insight into the complex world of programming. I find it very distracting when trying to design something, and too time consuming for real system descriptions. I have always thought it is important and tried to start my project with UML diagram, but it wasn't ever worth it.
The bigger the projects you are working in the more you need a language to speak with, known by all members of the project team - a common language like UML! But you need not to start learning C# with UML.

Categories