Add the where clause dynamically in Entity Framework

Add the where clause dynamically in Entity Framework - c#

I have this sql statement
SELECT userID from users WHERE
(name='name1' AND username='username1') OR
(name='name2' AND username='username2') OR
(name='name3' AND username='username3') OR
..........
(name='nameN' AND username='usernameN')
How can I implement this statement with entity framework using LINQ?

You can use a beautiful thing called PredicateBuilder. Use it like this
var pr = PredicateBuilder.False<User>();
foreach (var name in names)
{
pr = pr.Or(x => x.Name == name && x.Username == name);
}
return query.AsExpandable().Where(pr);

Expression<Func<User, bool>> whereExpression = null;
foreach (var name in names)
{
Expression<Func<User, bool>> e1 = u => u.Name == name;
Expression<Func<User, bool>> andExpression = e1.And(u => u.Username == name);
whereExpression = whereExpression == null
? andExpression
: whereExpression.Or(andExpression);
}
return query.Where(whereExpression);
This helper may help you.
public static class ExpressionExtensions
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> leftExpression,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> rightExpression)
{
if (leftExpression == null) return rightExpression;
if (rightExpression == null) return leftExpression;
var paramExpr = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T));
var exprBody = Expression.And(leftExpression.Body, rightExpression.Body);
exprBody = (BinaryExpression)new ParameterReplacer(paramExpr)
.Visit(exprBody);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(exprBody, paramExpr);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> leftExpression,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> rightExpression)
{
if (leftExpression == null) return rightExpression;
if (rightExpression == null) return leftExpression;
var paramExpr = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T));
var exprBody = Expression.Or(leftExpression.Body, rightExpression.Body);
exprBody = (BinaryExpression)new ParameterReplacer(paramExpr)
.Visit(exprBody);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(exprBody, paramExpr);
}
}
and:
class ParameterReplacer : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly ParameterExpression _parameter;
protected override Expression VisitParameter(ParameterExpression node)
{
return base.VisitParameter(_parameter);
}
internal ParameterReplacer(ParameterExpression parameter)
{
_parameter = parameter;
}
}

NOTE: this is modified from something I have so it might not work out of the box. But it would be a good starting point.
public static IQueryable<TEntity> Where<TEntity>(
this IQueryable<TEntity> source,
IEnumerable<WhereSpecifier> orClauses) where TEntity : class
{
if (!orClauses.Any()) return source.Where(t => false);
Type type = typeof (TEntity);
ParameterExpression parameter = null;
Expression predicate = Expression.Constant(false, typeof (bool));
ParameterExpression whereEnt = Expression.Parameter(type, "WhereEnt");
foreach (WhereSpecifier orClause in orClauses)
{
Expression selector;
if (orClause.Selector != null) {
selector = orClause.Selector;
parameter = orClause.Parameter;
}
else
{
parameter = whereEnt;
Type selectorResultType;
selector = GenerateSelector<TEntity>(parameter, orClause.Column,
out selectorResultType);
}
Expression clause = selector.CallMethod(orClause.Method,
MakeConstant(selector.Type, orClause.Value), orClause.Modifiers);
predicate = Expression.Or(predicate, clause);
}
var lambda = Expression.Lambda(predicate, whereEnt);
var resultExp = Expression.Call(typeof (Queryable), "Where", new[] {type},
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(lambda));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExp);
}
GenerateSelector:
public static Expression GenerateSelector<TEntity>(
ParameterExpression parameter, string propertyName,
out Type resultType) where TEntity : class
{
// create the selector part, but support child properties
PropertyInfo property;
Expression propertyAccess;
if (propertyName.Contains('.'))
{
// support to be sorted on child fields.
String[] childProperties = propertyName.Split('.');
property = typeof (TEntity).GetProperty(childProperties[0]);
propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
for (int i = 1; i < childProperties.Length; i++)
{
property = property.PropertyType.GetProperty(childProperties[i]);
propertyAccess = Expression
.MakeMemberAccess(propertyAccess, property);
}
}
else
{
property = typeof (TEntity).GetProperty(propertyName);
propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
}
resultType = property.PropertyType;
return propertyAccess;
}
WHereSpecifier:
public class WhereSpecifier
{
public WhereSpecifier(string column, CheckMethod method, string value,
CheckMethodModifiers modifiers)
{
Modifiers = modifiers;
Value = value;
Column = column;
Method = method;
}
public WhereSpecifier(string column, CheckMethod method, string value)
: this(column, method, value, CheckMethodModifiers.None)
{
}
public Expression Selector { get; set; }
public ParameterExpression Parameter { get; set; }
public string Column { get; set; }
public CheckMethod Method { get; set; }
public CheckMethodModifiers Modifiers { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
Usage:
var column = typeof(TEntity).Name + "ID";
var where = from id in SelectedIds
select new WhereSpecifier(column, CheckMethod.Equal, id.ToString());
return GetTable().Where(where);

I tried #Egor Pavlikhin solution but i got "The LINQ expression node type 'Invoke' is not supported in LINQ to Entities.".
According to this you can use PredicateExtensions :
var predicate = PredicateExtensions.Begin<User>();
foreach (var name in names)
{
pr = pr.Or(x => x.Name == name);
}
return _context.Users.Where(predicate);

Don't forget that entity framework also understands entity sql, so you can do this part of the query in a string. Building a string up is pretty convenient when you have dynamic stuff you need to do.

I had to construct the predicate for the 'Where' clause dynamically based on User Interface selections. 'System.Dynamic.Linq' allows to predicates from strings.
foreach (var name in names)
{
query = query.Where("Name=#0 And UserName=#1", name, name);
}
return query;
'System.Dynamic.Linq' is available as a nuget package. Check out Scott Guthrie's introduction to the topic here.

i found this way it is too simple :
var query = context.InvoiceHeader.Where( i => i.DateInvoice >= model.datedu && i.DateInvoice <= model.dateau).AsQueryable();
if(model.name != null)
{
query = query.Where(i => i.InvoiceNum.Equals(model.name));
}
if (model.status != 0 )
{
query = query.Where(i => i.REF_InvoiceStatusRecId == model.status);
}
if (model.paiements != 0)
{
query = query.Where(i => i.REF_PaymentTermRecId == model.paiements);
}
query = query.AsQueryable().OrderByDescending(x => x.RecId);

Related

how to select multi columns filter with lambda expression

is there a short way,
I don't want to use "if state" for every situation
what do you think
Description : type of query is IQueryable
public class OrderFilter{
public string SearchValue { get => _searchValue.ToLower(); set => _searchValue = value; }
public string[] SearchColumns { get; set; }
}
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderFilter.SearchValue))
if (orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("warehouse"))
query = query.Where(x => x.Warehouse.Description.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue));
if (orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("date"))
query = query.Where(x => x.Date.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue));
if (orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("warehouse") && orderFilter.SearchColumns.Contains("date"))
query = query.Where(x => x.OrderNo.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Warehouse.Description.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Client.Description.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Date.ToString().Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
|| x.Salesman.Username.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue)
);
}

Access nested properties with dynamic lambda using Linq.Expression
found the answer I was looking for
public class LambdaHelper
{
public Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> MultiSearchOrder<TSource>(string[] columns, string value)
{
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "x"); // x=> . ... demektir. parametre
MethodInfo containsMethod = typeof(String).GetMethod("Contains", new Type[] { typeof(String) });
Expression dynamiclambda = null;
MethodCallExpression call = null;
foreach (var propertyName in columns)
{
MemberExpression propertyAccess = NestedExpressionProperty(parameter, propertyName);
call = Expression.Call(propertyAccess, containsMethod, Expression.Constant(value));
if (null == dynamiclambda)
{
dynamiclambda = call;
}
else
{
dynamiclambda = Expression.Or(dynamiclambda, call);
}
}
Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(dynamiclambda, parameter);
return predicate;
}
private MemberExpression NestedExpressionProperty(Expression expression, string propertyName)
{
string[] parts = propertyName.Split('.');
int partsL = parts.Length;
return (partsL > 1)
?
Expression.Property(
NestedExpressionProperty(
expression,
parts.Take(partsL - 1)
.Aggregate((a, i) => a + "." + i)
),
parts[partsL - 1])
:
Expression.Property(expression, propertyName);
}

I think you add one property (SearchKey) that property contains of all properties value that used for search in writing time and you using this property instead of OR for example :
savingTime: SearhKey="OrderNo.value Warehouse.Description.Value ...."
Searching Time:
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(orderFilter.SearchValue))
{
query = query.Where(x =>
x.SearchKey.Contains(orderFilter.SearchValue) );
}

you can do an extension o OrderFilter and reuse it :
public static bool HasAny<TSource>(this OrderFilter filter, IEnumerable<TSource> source)
{
if(filter == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(filter));
if(filter.SearchColumns == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(filter.SearchColumns));
if(string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(filter.SearchValue))
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(filter.SearchValue));
if(source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(source));
var properties = typeof(TSource).GetProperties().Where(x=> filter.SearchColumns.Any(s=> s.IndexOf(x.Name, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) > 0));
foreach(var item in source)
{
foreach(var property in properties)
{
var value = property.GetValue(item)?.ToString();
if(value?.Equals(filter.SearchValue , StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) == true)
{
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
now you can do this :
var isValueExists = orderFilter.HasAny(query);

Is it possible to create in a lambda-function a dynamical field?

I have a function like this:
public CountryDto FindCountryByName(string name)
{
Country country = _countryRepository.GetAll().Where(g => g.Name.ToLower().Trim() == name.ToLower().Trim()).FirstOrDefault();
var dto = _mapper.Map<Country, CountryDto>(country);
return dto;
}
and it's referred to GetAll-function in the GenericRepository
public IEnumerable<T> GetAll()
{
return table.ToList();
}
Is it possible creating a function like this (in the GenericRepository)?
public IEnumerable<T> FindByName(string objname, string name)
{
return table.Where(t => t.GetType(objname) == name);
}
By example
Country country = _countryRepository.FindByName("CountryName", name);
and
AlbumTrack track = _albumtrackRepository.FindByName("SongTitle", songTitle);

I don't remember where I found this function, I'm using it to generate LINQ queries based on given property name, please note that you can change the search function "Equals" to "Contains" or "StartsWith" :
///<summary>
/// Create query that search in given property of class T for matching results with value
/// </summary>
public static IQueryable<T> CreateSearchQuery<T>(IQueryable<T> queryable, string PropertyName, string value) where T : class
{
IQueryable<T> query = queryable;
List<Expression> expressions = new List<Expression>();
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
MethodInfo Equals_Method = typeof(string).GetMethod("Equals", new[] { typeof(string) });
MethodInfo ToString_Method = typeof(object).GetMethod("ToString");
//Iterate through all properties Except inherited ones
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in typeof(T).GetProperties(BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public)
.Where(x => x.PropertyType == typeof(string) //properties of type string
|| x.Name == PropertyName))
{
ConstantExpression value_expression = Expression.Constant(value, typeof(string));
MemberExpression member_expression = Expression.PropertyOrField(parameter, prop.Name);
//Combine ToString() and Equals() methods
MethodCallExpression callChain = Expression.Call(Expression.Call(member_expression, ToString_Method), Equals_Method, value_expression);
expressions.Add(callChain);
}
if (expressions.Count == 0)
return query;
Expression or_expression = expressions[0];
for (int i = 1; i < expressions.Count; i++)
{
or_expression = Expression.OrElse(or_expression, expressions[i]);
}
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expression = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(or_expression, parameter);
return query.Where(expression);
}

C# - Order By property by reflection [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Dynamic LINQ OrderBy on IEnumerable<T> / IQueryable<T>
(24 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
How do I specify the argument passed to orderby using a value I take as a parameter?
Ex:
List<Student> existingStudends = new List<Student>{ new Student {...}, new Student {...}}
Currently implementation:
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderBy(c => c.Address).ToList();
Instead of c.Address, how can I take that as a parameter?
Example
string param = "City";
List<Student> orderbyAddress = existingStudends.OrderByDescending(c => param).ToList();

You can use a little bit of reflection to construct the expression tree as follows (this is an extension method):
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty,
bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
orderByProperty is the Property name you want to order by and if pass true as parameter for desc, will sort in descending order; otherwise, will sort in ascending order.
Now you should be able to do existingStudents.OrderBy("City",true); or existingStudents.OrderBy("City",false);

Here's a possiblity using reflection...
var param = "Address";
var propertyInfo = typeof(Student).GetProperty(param);
var orderByAddress = items.OrderBy(x => propertyInfo.GetValue(x, null));

To expand on the answer by #Icarus: if you want the return type of the extension method to be an IOrderedQueryable instead of an IQueryable, you can simply cast the result as follows:
public static IOrderedQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc)
{
string command = desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy";
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return (IOrderedQueryable<TEntity>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}

1) Install System.Linq.Dynamic
2) Add the following code
public static class OrderUtils
{
public static string ToStringForOrdering<T, TKey>(this Expression<Func<T, TKey>> expression, bool isDesc = false)
{
var str = expression.Body.ToString();
var param = expression.Parameters.First().Name;
str = str.Replace("Convert(", "(").Replace(param + ".", "");
return str + (isDesc ? " descending" : "");
}
}
3) Write your switch for selecting of Lambda function
public static class SortHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<UserApp, object>> UserApp(string orderProperty)
{
orderProperty = orderProperty?.ToLowerInvariant();
switch (orderProperty)
{
case "firstname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName;
case "lastname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "fullname":
return x => x.PersonalInfo.FirstName + x.PersonalInfo.LastName;
case "email":
return x => x.Email;
}
}
}
4) Use your helpers
Dbset.OrderBy(SortHelper.UserApp("firstname").ToStringForOrdering())
5) You can use it with pagging (PagedList)
public virtual IPagedList<T> GetPage<TOrder>(Page page, Expression<Func<T, bool>> where, Expression<Func<T, TOrder>> order, bool isDesc = false,
params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] includes)
{
var orderedQueryable = Dbset.OrderBy(order.ToStringForOrdering(isDesc));
var query = orderedQueryable.Where(where).GetPage(page);
query = AppendIncludes(query, includes);
var results = query.ToList();
var total = Dbset.Count(where);
return new StaticPagedList<T>(results, page.PageNumber, page.PageSize, total);
}
Explanation
System.Linq.Dynamic allows us to set string value in OrderBy method. But inside this extension the string will be parsed to Lambda. So I thought it would work if we will parse Lambda to string and give it to OrderBy method. And it works!

Here's something I came up with for dealing with a conditional Descending. You could combine this with other methods of generating the keySelector func dynamically.
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource, TKey>(this IQueryable<TSource> source,
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>> keySelector,
System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection sortOrder
)
{
if (sortOrder == System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending)
return source.OrderBy(keySelector);
else
return source.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
Usage:
//imagine this is some parameter
var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = query.OrderBy(ec => ec.MyColumnName, direction);
Notice this allows you to chain this .OrderBy extension with a new parameter onto any IQueryable.
// perhaps passed in as a request of user to change sort order
// var direction = System.ComponentModel.ListSortDirection.Ascending;
query = context.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Paid)
.OrderBy(ec => ec.OrderPaidUtc, direction);

private Func<T, object> GetOrderByExpression<T>(string sortColumn)
{
Func<T, object> orderByExpr = null;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortColumn))
{
Type sponsorResultType = typeof(T);
if (sponsorResultType.GetProperties().Any(prop => prop.Name == sortColumn))
{
System.Reflection.PropertyInfo pinfo = sponsorResultType.GetProperty(sortColumn);
orderByExpr = (data => pinfo.GetValue(data, null));
}
}
return orderByExpr;
}
public List<T> OrderByDir<T>(IEnumerable<T> source, string dir, Func<T, object> OrderByColumn)
{
return dir.ToUpper() == "ASC" ? source.OrderBy(OrderByColumn).ToList() : source.OrderByDescending(OrderByColumn).ToList();``
}
// Call the code like below
var orderByExpression= GetOrderByExpression<SearchResultsType>(sort);
var data = OrderByDir<SponsorSearchResults>(resultRecords, SortDirectionString, orderByExpression);

This doesn't let you pass a string, as you asked for in your question, but it might still work for you.
The OrderByDescending method takes a Func<TSource, TKey>, so you can rewrite your function this way:
List<Student> QueryStudents<TKey>(Func<Student, TKey> orderBy)
{
return existingStudents.OrderByDescending(orderBy).ToList();
}
There are other overloads for OrderByDescending as well that take a Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>>, and/or a IComparer<TKey>. You could also look into those and see if they provide you anything of use.

The only solution that worked for me was posted here https://gist.github.com/neoGeneva/1878868 by neoGeneva.
I will re-post his code because it works well and I wouldn't want it to be lost in the interwebs!
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortExpression)
{
if (source == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("source", "source is null.");
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(sortExpression))
throw new ArgumentException("sortExpression is null or empty.", "sortExpression");
var parts = sortExpression.Split(' ');
var isDescending = false;
var propertyName = "";
var tType = typeof(T);
if (parts.Length > 0 && parts[0] != "")
{
propertyName = parts[0];
if (parts.Length > 1)
{
isDescending = parts[1].ToLower().Contains("esc");
}
PropertyInfo prop = tType.GetProperty(propertyName);
if (prop == null)
{
throw new ArgumentException(string.Format("No property '{0}' on type '{1}'", propertyName, tType.Name));
}
var funcType = typeof(Func<,>)
.MakeGenericType(tType, prop.PropertyType);
var lambdaBuilder = typeof(Expression)
.GetMethods()
.First(x => x.Name == "Lambda" && x.ContainsGenericParameters && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(funcType);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(tType);
var propExpress = Expression.Property(parameter, prop);
var sortLambda = lambdaBuilder
.Invoke(null, new object[] { propExpress, new ParameterExpression[] { parameter } });
var sorter = typeof(Queryable)
.GetMethods()
.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == (isDescending ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy") && x.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { tType, prop.PropertyType });
return (IQueryable<T>)sorter
.Invoke(null, new object[] { source, sortLambda });
}
return source;
}

Add the nugget package Dynamite to your code
Add the namespace Dynamite.Extensions
Eg : using Dynamite.Extensions;
Give Order by query like any SQL query
Eg : students.OrderBy(" City DESC, Address").ToList();

To extend the response of #Icarus: if you want to sort by two fields I could perform the following function (for one field the response of Icarius works very well).
public static IQueryable<T> OrderByDynamic<T>(this IQueryable<T> q, string SortField1, string SortField2, bool Ascending)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
var body = GetBodyExp(SortField1, SortField2, param);
var exp = Expression.Lambda(body, param);
string method = Ascending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Type[] types = new Type[] { q.ElementType, exp.Body.Type };
var mce = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), method, types, q.Expression, exp);
return q.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(mce);
}
This is the function that the body returns for the lambda expression, it works with string and int, but it is enough to add more types to make it work according to the need of each programmer
public static NewExpression GetBodyExp(string field1, string field2, ParameterExpression Parametro)
{
// SE OBTIENE LOS NOMBRES DE LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLE
string TypeName1 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field1).Type.Name;
string TypeName2 = Expression.Property(Parametro, field2).Type.Name;
// SE DECLARA EL TIPO ANONIMO SEGUN LOS TIPOS DE VARIABLES
Type TypeAnonymous = null;
if (TypeName1 == "String")
{
string var1 = "0";
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
int var2 = 0;
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
if (TypeName1 == "Int32")
{
int var1 = 0;
if (TypeName2 == "Int32")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
if (TypeName2 == "String")
{
string var2 = "0";
var example = new { var1, var2 };
TypeAnonymous = example.GetType();
}
}
//se declaran los TIPOS NECESARIOS PARA GENERAR EL BODY DE LA EXPRESION LAMBDA
MemberExpression[] args = new[] { Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field1), Expression.PropertyOrField(Parametro, field2) };
ConstructorInfo CInfo = TypeAnonymous.GetConstructors()[0];
IEnumerable<MemberInfo> a = TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property);
//BODY
NewExpression body = Expression.New(CInfo, args, TypeAnonymous.GetMembers().Where(m => m.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property));
return body;
}
to use it the following is done
IQueryable<MyClass> IqMyClass= context.MyClass.AsQueryable();
List<MyClass> ListMyClass= IqMyClass.OrderByDynamic("UserName", "IdMyClass", true).ToList();
if there is a better way to do this, it would be great if they share it
I managed to solve it thanks to: How can I make a Multiple property lambda expression with Linq

New Answer : this is a more complete answer that supports multiple columns for order by like SQL. Example : .OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC") :
namespace Utility;
public static class QueryExtension
{
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string orderByProperty, bool desc, bool isThenBy = false)
{
string command = isThenBy ? (desc ? "ThenByDescending" : "ThenBy") : (desc ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy");
var type = typeof(TEntity);
var property = type.GetProperty(orderByProperty);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExpression = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
var resultExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), command, new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExpression));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<TEntity>(resultExpression);
}
public static IQueryable<TEntity> OrderBy<TEntity>(this IQueryable<TEntity> source, string sqlOrderByList)
{
var ordebyItems = sqlOrderByList.Trim().Split(',');
IQueryable<TEntity> result = source;
bool useThenBy = false;
foreach (var item in ordebyItems)
{
var splt = item.Trim().Split(' ');
result = result.OrderBy(splt[0].Trim(), (splt.Length > 1 && splt[1].Trim().ToLower() == "desc"), useThenBy);
if (useThenBy)
useThenBy = true;
}
return result;
}
}
The second function iterates over orderby columns and uses the first one.
Use it like this :
using Utility;
...
public void MyMethod()
{
var query = _dbContext.Person.AsQueryable();
query.OrderBy("FirstName,Age DESC");
}

I'm way late to the party but none of these solutions worked for me. I was eager to try System.Linq.Dynamic, but I couldn't find that on Nuget, maybe depreciated? Either way...
Here is a solutions I came up with. I needed to dynamically use a mixture of OrderBy, OrderByDescending and OrderBy > ThenBy.
I simply created an extension method for my list object, a bit hacky I know... I wouldn't recommend this if it were something I was doing a lot of, but it's good for a one off.
List<Employee> Employees = GetAllEmployees();
foreach(Employee oEmployee in Employees.ApplyDynamicSort(eEmployeeSort))
{
//do stuff
}
public static IOrderedEnumerable<Employee> ApplyDynamicSort(this List<Employee> lEmployees, Enums.EmployeeSort eEmployeeSort)
{
switch (eEmployeeSort)
{
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_ASC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Name_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderByDescending(x => x.Name);
case Enums.EmployeeSort.Department_ASC_Salary_DESC:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Department).ThenByDescending(y => y.Salary);
default:
return lEmployees.OrderBy(x => x.Name);
}
}

How to query column name compare with a string?

I want to sort my columns on the base of column name which is a string but unfortunately I couldn't achieve this because OrderByDescending compares something else, but I am sending a string.
public List<DOlead> sortLead(DOuser user, string Item)
{
List<DOlead> ObjLead = new List<DOlead>();
ObjLead = _Context.leads.Where(x => x.is_converted == false).OrderByDescending(Item).ToList();
return ObjLead;
}
Kindly Help me out?

Use reflection
public List<DOlead> sortLead(DOuser user, string Item)
{
var propertyInfo = typeof(DOlead).GetProperty(Item);
List<DOlead> ObjLead = new List<DOlead>();
ObjLead = _Context.leads.Where(x => x.is_converted == false).OrderByDescending(x => propertyInfo.GetValue(x, null)).ToList();
return ObjLead;
}
Edit
After getting comment by SO, and after some research, I came across this answer and decided to modify it for user.
You have to create lambda expression first then pass it to order by clause.
Creating lambda expression.
public static class QueryableHelper
{
public static IQueryable<TModel> OrderBy<TModel>(this IQueryable<TModel> q, string name)
{
Type entityType = typeof(TModel);
PropertyInfo p = entityType.GetProperty(name);
MethodInfo m = typeof(QueryableHelper).GetMethod("OrderByProperty").MakeGenericMethod(entityType, p.PropertyType);
return(IQueryable<TModel>) m.Invoke(null, new object[] { q, p });
}
public static IQueryable<TModel> OrderByDescending<TModel>(this IQueryable<TModel> q, string name)
{
Type entityType = typeof(TModel);
PropertyInfo p = entityType.GetProperty(name);
MethodInfo m = typeof(QueryableHelper).GetMethod("OrderByPropertyDescending").MakeGenericMethod(entityType, p.PropertyType);
return (IQueryable<TModel>)m.Invoke(null, new object[] { q, p });
}
public static IQueryable<TModel> OrderByPropertyDescending<TModel, TRet>(IQueryable<TModel> q, PropertyInfo p)
{
ParameterExpression pe = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TModel));
Expression se = Expression.Convert(Expression.Property(pe, p), typeof(object));
return q.OrderByDescending(Expression.Lambda<Func<TModel, TRet>>(se, pe));
}
public static IQueryable<TModel> OrderByProperty<TModel, TRet>(IQueryable<TModel> q, PropertyInfo p)
{
ParameterExpression pe = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TModel));
Expression se = Expression.Convert(Expression.Property(pe, p), typeof(object));
return q.OrderBy(Expression.Lambda<Func<TModel, TRet>>(se, pe));
}
}
Your modified method
public List<DOlead> sortLead(DOuser user, string Item)
{
List<DOlead> ObjLead = new List<DOlead>();
ObjLead = _Context.leads.Where(x => x.is_converted == false).OrderByDescending(Item).ToList();
return ObjLead;
}

From Stack , I guess you could use reflection:
from x in db.TableName
where (x.GetType().GetProperty(stringCOLUMN_1_or2).GetValue(x, null)) == " 8"
select x;
Not sure there's any easy Linqish way to do that though...
Assuming dynamic Linq will work it would just be:
from x in objets
.Where(stringCOLUMN_1_or2 + " = ' " + 8 + "'")
select x
There is some more info about dynamic Linq with SQL here: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/01/07/dynamic-linq-part-1-using-the-linq-dynamic-query-library.aspx

You should use Expression builder to achieve this example simple with string properties:
public class OrderByData
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
}
public static class ExpressionBuilder
{
public static Expression<Func<T, string>> GetExpression<T>(OrderByData filter)
{
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
Expression exp = GetExpression<T>(param, filter);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, string>>(exp, param);
}
private static Expression GetExpression<T>(ParameterExpression param, OrderByData filter)
{
MemberExpression member = Expression.Property(param, filter.PropertyName);
return member;
}
}
and then call like this:
public List<DOlead> sortLead(DOuser user, string Item)
{
List<DOlead> ObjLead = new List<DOlead>();
new OrderByData { PropertyName = Item };
var deleg = ExpressionBuilder.GetExpression<lead>(filter).Compile();
ObjLead = _Context.leads.Where(x => x.is_converted == false).OrderByDescending(deleg).ToList();
return ObjLead;
}
also you can extend to use also other types not only strings.

You need to pass delegate to OrderByDescending method.
As you just have the property name so you need to access to the property dynamically, you can use dynamic expression to do so:
public List<DOlead> sortLead(DOuser user, string Item)
{
List<DOlead> ObjLead = new List<DOlead>();
ObjLead = _Context.leads.Where(x => x.is_converted == false).OrderByDescending((d) =>
Expression.Lambda(Expression.Property(Expression.Constant(d), Item)).Compile()()).ToList();
return ObjLead;
}

Combining multiple expressions trees

I'm getting the following error
The parameter 'p' was not bound in the specified LINQ to Entities
query expression.
I understand the problem (same instance of ParameterExpression should be used with all the expressions in the tree) and have attempted to use solutions I've found online but with no luck.
This is my method
private void SeedEntity<TEntity>(DatabaseContext context, ref TEntity entity, params Expression<Func<TEntity, object>>[] identifierExpressions) where TEntity : class
{
Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> allExpresions = null;
var parameters = identifierExpressions.SelectMany(x => x.Parameters).GroupBy(x => x.Name).Select(p => p.First()).ToList();
foreach (Expression<Func<TEntity, object>> identifierExpression in identifierExpressions)
{
Func<TEntity, object> vv = identifierExpression.Compile();
object constant = vv(entity);
ConstantExpression constExp = Expression.Constant(constant, typeof(object));
BinaryExpression equalExpression1 = Expression.Equal(identifierExpression.Body, constExp);
Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> equalExpression2 = Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(equalExpression1, parameters);
if (allExpresions == null)
{
allExpresions = equalExpression2;
}
else
{
BinaryExpression bin = Expression.And(allExpresions.Body, equalExpression2.Body);
allExpresions = Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(bin, parameters);
}
}
TEntity existingEntity = null;
if (allExpresions != null)
{
existingEntity = context.Set<TEntity>().FirstOrDefault(allExpresions);
}
if (existingEntity == null)
{
context.Set<TEntity>().Add(entity);
}
else
{
entity = existingEntity;
}
}
It generates an expression for the lookup of an entity based on a number of properties.
It works fine for a single expression, the error only occurs when passing in multiple.
Called like this:
SeedEntity(context, ref e, p=> p.Name);//Works
SeedEntity(context, ref e, p=> p.Name, p=> p.Age);//Fails
It generates something similar to me performing the following:
context.Set<TEntity>().FirstOrDefault(p=>p.Name == e.Name && p.Age == e.Age);
Replacing e.Name && e.Age with a ConstantExpression
You can see in the method above I grab all of the unique params and store them in parameters at the top, then use the same variable throughout.This is the start, but then I need to replace the instances of the parameter in each of the Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> passed in as the params array, this is where I'm failing.
I've tried enumerate the expressions and use the .Update() method passing in the params
I also tried a solution using the ExpressionVisitor
public class ExpressionSubstitute : ExpressionVisitor
{
public readonly Expression from, to;
public ExpressionSubstitute(Expression from, Expression to)
{
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node)
{
if (node == from) return to;
return base.Visit(node);
}
}
public static class ExpressionSubstituteExtentions
{
public static Expression<Func<TEntity, TReturnType>> RewireLambdaExpression<TEntity, TReturnType>(Expression<Func<TEntity, TReturnType>> expression, ParameterExpression newLambdaParameter)
{
var newExp = new ExpressionSubstitute(expression.Parameters.Single(), newLambdaParameter).Visit(expression);
return (Expression<Func<TEntity, TReturnType>>)newExp;
}
}

You're really close. I don't see the point of your parameters variable. Grouping them by name is a mistake. Why not just pass the parameters from the expression? Then visit if necessary. Your visitor code is fine.
private static void SeedEntity<TEntity>(DbContext context, ref TEntity entity, params Expression<Func<TEntity, object>>[] identifierExpressions)
where TEntity : class
{
Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> allExpresions = null;
foreach (Expression<Func<TEntity, object>> identifierExpression in identifierExpressions)
{
Func<TEntity, object> vv = identifierExpression.Compile();
object constant = vv(entity);
ConstantExpression constExp = Expression.Constant(constant, typeof(object));
BinaryExpression equalExpression1 = Expression.Equal(identifierExpression.Body, constExp);
Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> equalExpression2 = Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(equalExpression1, identifierExpression.Parameters);
if (allExpresions == null)
{
allExpresions = equalExpression2;
}
else
{
var visitor = new ExpressionSubstitute(allExpresions.Parameters[0], identifierExpression.Parameters[0]);
var modifiedAll = (Expression<Func<TEntity,bool>>)visitor.Visit(allExpresions);
BinaryExpression bin = Expression.And(modifiedAll.Body, equalExpression2.Body);
allExpresions = Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(bin, identifierExpression.Parameters);
}
}
TEntity existingEntity = null;
if (allExpresions != null)
{
existingEntity = context.Set<TEntity>().FirstOrDefault(allExpresions);
}
if (existingEntity == null)
{
context.Set<TEntity>().Add(entity);
}
else
{
entity = existingEntity;
}
}

We Keep Coding

C# (C-Sharp) is a programming language developed by Microsoft that runs on the .NET Framework.

Add the where clause dynamically in Entity Framework - c#

You can use a beautiful thing called PredicateBuilder. Use it like this var pr = PredicateBuilder.False<User>(); foreach (var name in names) { pr = pr.Or(x => x.Name == name && x.Username == name); } return query.AsExpandable().Where(pr);

Don't forget that entity framework also understands entity sql, so you can do this part of the query in a string. Building a string up is pretty convenient when you have dynamic stuff you need to do.

Related

how to select multi columns filter with lambda expression

Is it possible to create in a lambda-function a dynamical field?

C# - Order By property by reflection [duplicate]

How to query column name compare with a string?

Combining multiple expressions trees

Categories

Resources