I have the following two routes defined:
routes.MapRoute(null, "" // ~/
,new { controller="Products", action="List", page=1 });
routes.MapRoute(null, "{category}/Page{page}" // ~/CategoryName/Page21
, new { controller = "Products", action = "List", page = 1 }
, new { page = #"\d+" } //page must be numerical
);
I am generating a URL using this code in the view being used by ProductsController: Url.Action("List", new {page=p, category=Model.CurrentCategory})
With the current configuration, I get this URL: /Riding/Page2
However, if I omit the default page parameter from the first route, I get this URL instead: /?category=Riding&page=2
It seems to me that Url.Action() can match both routes and is making a decision to use the second route if I have the default page parameter specified in the first route but is choosing to use the first route if that parameter is omitted.
Given that I am supplying a value for page parameter, why would eliminating it from the route's defaults make a difference in the URL I get back?
Thanks!
Try installing the NuGet package Glimpse. It has excellent route debugging, it should be able to help you.
Here's a blog post by Scott Hanselan on how to use it: NuGet Package of the Week #5
Related
public ActionResult Logout()
{
FormsAuthentication.SignOut();
return RedirectToRoute("Home");
}
I expect this action to redirect the user to the homepage but instead, a redirect loop occurs (according to Chrome).
The aforementioned action belongs to a controller in the "admin" area as where the "Home" route is defined for the default area - I suspect this to be relevant.
Here is the route for good measure:
routes.MapRoute(
"Home",
"{controller}/{action}/{slug}",
new { controller = "Posts", action = "Index", slug = UrlParameter.Optional },
new[] { "GoBlog.Controllers" }
);
Update
Replacing the return statement with the following will cause the action to work as expected:
return RedirectToRoute("Home", (RouteTable.Routes["Home"] as Route).Defaults);
I want to know why this is the case. Ideally I can omit the (cumbersome) second argument.
This issue is particular to the call RedirectToRoute(string) and your particular route:
routes.MapRoute(
"Home",
"{controller}/{action}/{slug}",
new { controller = "Posts", action = "Index", slug = UrlParameter.Optional },
new[] { "GoBlog.Controllers" }
);
What you expected was RedirectToRoute would populate your arbitrary route definition of {controller}/{action}/ with the route's defined defaults:
controller = "Posts", action = "Index"
But RedirectToRoute like all redirect methods, is a part of your controller, and uses your current Controller and Action as Default Values where ever possible. This is a "feature" of the ASP.NET MVC framework -- re-using routes to create new routes. This approach is valuable because your current Controller and Action are strong hints as to your intention.
A great example of this is RedirectToAction(string) which assumes your current instantiated Controller is the default.
Contrast this with:
return RedirectToRoute("Home", (RouteTable.Routes["Home"] as Route).Defaults);
Rather than directing the framework to use it's best guess about how to populate the ambiguous wild card route, you have specifically instructed the framework to use the Defaults from the RouteTable for "Home" route to construct a route and return it as a RouteObject.
When you call RedirectToRoute(string)
This method converts the route name that is passed in routeName to a URL by using the RouteCollection.GetVirtualPath method.
where pass null as parameter RouteValueDictionary. So in this case this parameters was getting from current RequestContext with values for controller, action and etc, i.e. you get url like this
"{controller}/{action}/{slug}"
"Login/Logout/"
and got redirecting loop.
when you call
return RedirectToRoute("Home", (RouteTable.Routes["Home"] as Route).Defaults);
instead RedirectToRoute(string) used RedirectToRoute(String, RouteValueDictionary) and in RouteCollection.GetVirtualPath method you pass defaults values for that route.
It is a general best practice in MVC to allow your controllers as much control as possible. There are multiple controller methods which you can use, and you should generally use the one that is the closest fit to the process you are performing.
return View(). tells the controller to generate and return the specified HTML, similar to a Server.Transfer(). Use for matching HTML with Actions, or when delivering static HTML without interest in the URL string.
Return RedirectToAction(). Tells the controller to build a new URL string based on the Action. This will parse the route dictionary for the Action, and handle the defaults. It acts as a Response.Redirect(), and will return a new generated URL. In general, this is the most commonly used redirect. This also has the benefit of not changing if the route dictionary is changed.
return RedirectToRoute(). Similar to RedirectToAction(), however tied to the Route Dictionary. This will search the Route Dictionary for an exact route match, using whatever route parameters are passed. This does not look for Actions, and thus does not build a route or inject default values. Used when an exact route with specific non-default values must be processed.
return Redirect(). This redirect requires a full URL, and will redirect to the new URL. Usually used when redirecting to a URL on a totally different domain.
I would like my ASP.NET MVC4 application to only serve the base HTML markup for a specific page, and after that I'm processing everything else on client-side with knockout.js/history.js/AJAX, including the initial page load.
So when someone refers to URL http://example.com/products/list/food/fruits, the MVC router should simply ignore everything what is behind "products/list" and route the request to ProductsController and List action. Then on client-side I will handle the rest and load the requested data accordingly.
I was playing with the route definitions, I tried to completely skip the "products/list" route, I also tried to add a "products/list/*" route, but didn't have success yet.
You can use an asterisk as part of the last variable in a route. For example, when configuring your routes:
routes.MapRoute(
"ProductRoute",
"products/list/{*otherArgs}",
new { controller = "Products", action = "List" });
You can learn more in MSDN's Documentation on routing under the section "Handling a Variable Number of Segments in a URL Pattern"
You will need to create your own route.
Something like this should do the trick:
routes.MapRoute("Products", "Products/{List}",
new {controller = "Products", action = "List"}
);
Note: I´m not sure if the other parameters are required in the route.
I have some problem with routing in my ASP.NET MVC3 application, exactly it doesn't works as I want.
Routing definition in Global.asax
routes.MapRoute(
"News", // Route name
"{lang}/{controller}/{action}/{page}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { lang = "pl", controller = "News", action = "Index", page = 1, id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
So I want use it in 2 situation:
/{lang}/{controller}/{action}/{page} - to go to specific paginations' page
/{lang}/{controller}/{action}/{page}/{id} - to remember a current page, and go to page with specific id.
to generate links I use:
#Html.RouteLink(i.ToString(), "News", new { lang = ViewBag.Lang, page = i })
where i is number of page, and lang is language.
In Controller i handle it witch Action:
public ViewResult Index(string lang, int page = 1)
PROBLEM
#Html.RouteLink gives me link /pl/News/Index/2 (when '2' was clicked) but my controller doesn't handle it and page is still '1'. So when I click the same link twice it gives : /pl/News/Index/2/2 and then page equals '2'.
If somebody can explain me how it exactly works, and what can I do to solve it?
Any help would be appreciated.
I guess what you're missing here is that the routing system uses the variable values from the current request to generate the outbound rules.
For example - if you're on the page /pl/News/Index/2 you have
lang = "pl", controller = "News", action = "Index", page = 2
if you try to generate a rule like this
#Html.RouteLink(i.ToString(), "News")
the routing system will use the already present variables like lang and page and will generate exactly the same URL - /pl/News/Index/2.
Of course values that you pass in the anonymous type in Html.RouteLink are treated with priority and will override values from the current request. So in your example you should consider what URL are you at when you generate the link.
Order of precedence is:
variables passed in the anonymous type
request variables
default values defined in the route.
It seems that this part
lang = ViewBag.Lang
is useless since lang will be taken from the request if you don't supply it - so it will be preserved.
Update(might not be relevant):
You should also keep in mind that if you have more than one match for a rule - the routing system will choose the first one which satisfies the constraints(for example values from request should not conflicts with default variables)
Update2:
The routing system uses request variables up to the first explicitly specified variable(via the anonymous type) so if you specify lang explicitly - no request variables will be reused(in your case, because lang is the first segment in your url)
I think part of your problem is that you're breaking convention a bit, and since MVC relies on convention to route successfully, your mapping is a bit busted.
I would suggest rewriting your routing like so:
routes.MapRoute(
"News", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{lang}/{id}/{page}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "News", action = "Index", lang = "pl", page = 1, id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults
);
It seems like the most common case scenario for a URL would be something like:
http://yourdomainhere/news/pl/some-sort-of-permalink/1
How should I configure the following non area routes?
/foo/{controller}/{action}/{id}
maps to controllers in namespace myapp.foo.
/{controller}/{action}/{id}
maps to controllers in namespace myapp.
I also have 2 areas, bar and baz, they are registered with registeraAllAreas.
My current setup
This is my current setup. It gives the problem below when I use the url /Home/Index.
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
routes.IgnoreRoute("myapp/elmah.axd/{*pathInfo}");
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
routes.MapRoute(
"foo", // Route name
"foo/{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }, // Parameter defaults
new string[] { "myapp.Controllers.foo" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Default", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional }, // Parameter defaults
new string[] { "myapp.Controllers" }
);
Multiple types were found that match the controller named 'Menu'. This
can happen if the route that services this request
('foo/{controller}/{action}/{id}') does not specify namespaces to
search for a controller that matches the request.
The request for 'Menu' has found the following matching controllers:
myapp.Controllers.MenuController
myapp.Areas.bar.Controllers.MenuController
myapp.Areas.baz.Controllers.MenuController
Clearly there's something I'm doing the wrong way.
Update
I also get the wrong adress generated when I use:
<% using (Ajax.BeginForm("SaveSomething", "Home", ...
It renders <form target="/foo/Home/SaveSomething"
I'm guessing that one cannot reliably use {controller} in two routes in the same area.
Update 2
It seems to work much better when I put the /foo route registration at the bottom.
This raises the question, what is considered a/the default route? (As the default route is reccomended to be put at the very end.)
You have two controllers that has the name MenuController so MVC doesn't know which one to use if you don't give it more information. In you areas you probably have a files named something like <YourAreaName>AreaRegistration. Open those files and update the RegisterArea method so you route the request to the right controller.
From your error message it seems like the route is getting mapped to foo/{controller}/{action}/{id}, which doesn't have a MenuController. My guess is that you have a action link on a page under foo something something. That will generate an incorrect link if you don't specify the area for the link.
Try this to use the default route with ActionLink:
#Html.ActionLink("Some text", "action", "controller", new { area = "" }, null)
If you want the request to go to a specific area just write it down in the call.
UPDATE: The problem is that when you write something like Ajax.BeginForm("SaveSomething", "Home",...) it will match the first route. You can't solve this by putting the area in the BeginForm statement as I suggested before since the foo route is not an area. You have two options, 1: move the foo part to an area, 2: put the foo route after the default route. If you put the default route before the foo route you will get a hard time rendering urls as long as you have foo in the same area as the default route (the default area), since the route engine will always find the default one first. However, you will be able to catch request to the foo route. So my best suggestion is to put the foo route in an area.
I have a controller named Movie, with an action named ByYear, which takes the year as a parameter :
public ActionResult ByYear(int year)
{
ViewData["Title"] = string.Format("Movies released in {0}", year);
var repository = MvcApplication.GetRepository();
var movies = repository.Medias
.OfType<Movie>()
.Where(m => m.Year == year);
return View("Index", movies);
}
I'd like to access this action with the following URL : /Movie/ByYear/{year}, but the only valid route for this action is this : /Movie/ByYear?year={year}.
I tried to add new routes in my application's RegisterRoutes method, but I can't find a way to get the desired result...
Could anyone tell me how to achieve that ?
Note: this is actually very similar to this question, but no answer was accepted, and the highest voted answer makes no sense to me as I'm completely new to MVC...
Change the name of your parameter year to id and this will match the default route that MVC adds to your project.
So for further clarification, let's take a look at the default route added by ASP.NET MVC:
routes.MapRoute(
"default",
"{controller}/{action}/{id}",
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" }
);
In this route you can see three tokens that are named specifically for controller, action, and the third token which is passed to the action is id. When a request comes into your application, ASP.NET MVC will analyze the routes that are currently mapped and try to find a method signature that matches them by using reflection against your controllers.
When it looks at your Movie controller, it sees an action called ByYear, however that method takes an integer called year, not id. This is why you end up with something like /Movie/ByYear?year={year} when you create an ActionLink for that particular Action. So to fix this, you have two options:
The first and most simple method to fix this is to just change the method signature for your Action to accept a parameter named id which is what I recommended above. This will work fine, but I can see where it might cause a little bit of confusion when you go back to that source later and wonder why you called that parameter id.
The second method is to add another route that matches that method signature. To do this, you should open your Global.asax and just add the following (untested, but should work):
routes.MapRoute(
"MoviesByYear",
"Movies/ByYear/{year}",
new { controller = "Movie", action = "ByYear" }
);
This route is hard-coded, yes, but it won't break the other routes in your system, and it will allow you to call the method parameter year.
EDIT 2: Another thing to note is that the routing engine will stop on the first route it finds that matches your request, so any custom routes like this should be added before the default route so you are sure they will be found.
OK, I just found out how to do it. I just had to create the new route before the default route... I didn't think the order had any significance
routes.MapRoute(
"MovieByYear", // Route name
"Movie/ByYear/{year}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Movie", action = "ByYear" } // Parameter defaults
);
EDIT: Isn't there a simpler way ? (not involving renaming the parameters). I'd like to be able to do something like that :
[Route("/Movie/ByYear/{year}")]
public ActionResult ByYear(int year)
{
...
Design considerations aside, if you did not want to rename the parameter, you could add something like the route below, which enforces having the year parameter
routes.MapRoute(
"MovieByYear", // Route name
"Movie/ByYear/{year}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Movie", action = "ByYear" },
new { year = #"\d+" } // Parameter defaults
);