I know that I can use .Min() to get minimum value from column, but how to get minimum value in a row?
I have following LINQ query (for testing purposes):
from p in Pravidloes
where p.DulezitostId == 3
where p.ZpozdeniId == 1 || p.ZpozdeniId == 2
where p.SpolehlivostId == 2 || p.SpolehlivostId == 3
group p by p.VysledekId into g
select new {
result = g.Key,
value = g
}
Which results into this:
I would however like to get only the MIN value of following three columns:
DulezitostId, ZpozdeniId, SpolehlivostId as a value in:
select new {
result = g.Key,
value = g // <-- here
}
The final result then should look like:
result: 2, value: 1
result: 3, value: 2
I have been looking for similar questions here and googled for few examples with grouping and aggregating queries, but found nothing that would move me forward with this problem.
Btw: Solution isn't limited to linq, if you know better way how to do it.
You could create an array of the values and do Min on those.
select new {
result = g.Key,
value = g.SelectMany(x => new int[] { x.DulezitostId, x.ZpozdeniId, x.SpolehlivostId }).Min()
}
This will return the min for those 3 values in each grouping for ALL rows of that grouping.
Which would result in something like this...
result: 3, value: 1
The below will select the min for each row in the grouping...
select new {
result = g.Key,
value = g.Select(x => new int[] { x.DulezitostId, x.ZpozdeniId, x.SpolehlivostId }.Min())
}
Which would result in something like this...
result: 3, value: 1, 2
The best solution if you're using straight LINQ is Chad's answer. However, if you're using Linq To SQL it won't work because you can't construct an array like that.
Unfortunately, I believe the only way to do this in Linq To Sql is to use Math.Min repeatedly:
select new {
result = g.Key,
value = Math.Min(Math.Min(DulezitostId, ZpozdeniId), SpolehlivostId)
}
This will generate some ugly CASE WHEN ... statements, but it works.
The main advantage of doing it this way is that you're only returning the data you need from SQL (instead of returning all 3 columns and doing the Min in the application).
Related
In table I have 4 Columns GroupName, Display, Value and ID
How can I just show a specific data in display. I only want to show some of the groupNames Data
for example I only want to show Groupname = company and display = Forbes
Here's my linq
sample = (from c in smsDashboardDBContext.CodeDefinitions
orderby c.Display ascending
select new CodeDefinitionDTO
{
GroupName = c.GroupName,
Display = c.Display,
Value = c.Value,
Id = c.Id
}).ToList();
You can add a where statement in the query.
where c.GroupName == "company" && c.Display == "Forbes"
I only want to show some of the groupNames Data for example I only want to show Groupname = company and display = Forbes
Before the ToList, use a Where to keep only those items that you want to show:
var company = ...
var forbes = ...
var result = smsDashboardDBContext.CodeDefinitions
.OrderBy(codeDefinition => codeDefintion.Display)
.Select(codeDefinition => new CodeDefinitionDTO
{
Id = codeDefinition.Id,
GroupName = codeDefinition.GroupName,
Display = codeDefinition.Display,
Value = codeDefinition.Value,
})
.Where(codeDefinition => codeDefition.GroupName == company
&& codeDefintion.Display == forbes);
In words:
Order all codeDefinitions that are in the table of CodeDefintions by ascending value of property codeDefintion.Display.
From every codeDefinition in this ordered sequence make one new CodeDefinitionDTO with the following properties filled: Id, GroupName, Display, Value
Frome every codeDefintion in this sequence of CodeDefinitionDTOs, keep only those codeDefinitions that have a value for property GroupName that equals company and a value for property Display that equals forbes.
There is room for improvement!
Suppose your table has one million elements, and after the Where, only five elements are left. Then you will have sorted almost one million elements for nothing. Consider to first do the Where, then the Order and finally a Select.
In LINQ, try to do aWhere as soon as possible: all following statements will have to work on less items
In LINQ, try to do a Select as late as possible, preferrably just before the ToList / FirstOrDefault / ... This way the Select has to be done for as few elements as possible
So first the Where, then the OrderBy, then the Select, and finally the ToList / FirstOrDefault, etc:
var result = smsDashboardDBContext.CodeDefinitions
.Where(codeDefinition => ...);
.OrderBy(codeDefinition => codeDefintion.Display)
.Select(codeDefinition => new CodeDefinitionDTO
{
...
});
I have a sample of JSON data that I am converting to a JArray with NewtonSoft.
string jsonString = #"[{'features': ['sunroof','mag wheels']},{'features': ['sunroof']},{'features': ['mag wheels']},{'features': ['sunroof','mag wheels','spoiler']},{'features': ['sunroof','spoiler']},{'features': ['sunroof','mag wheels']},{'features': ['spoiler']}]";
I am trying to retrieve the features that are most commonly requested together. Based on the above dataset, my expected output would be:
sunroof, mag wheels, 2
sunroof, 1
mag wheels 1
sunroof, mag wheels, spoiler, 1
sunroof, spoiler, 1
spoiler, 1
However, my LINQ is rusty, and the code I am using to query my JSON data is returning the count of the individual features, not the features selected together:
JArray autoFeatures = JArray.Parse(jsonString);
var features = from f in autoFeatures.Select(feat => feat["features"]).Values<string>()
group f by f into grp
orderby grp.Count() descending
select new { indFeature = grp.Key, count = grp.Count() };
foreach (var feature in features)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0}, {1}", feature.indFeature, feature.count);
}
Actual Output:
sunroof, 5
mag wheels, 4
spoiler, 3
I was thinking maybe my query needs a 'distinct' in it, but I'm just not sure.
This is a problem with the Select. You are telling it to make each value found in the arrays to be its own item. In actuality you need to combine all the values into a string for each feature. Here is how you do it
var features = from f in autoFeatures.Select(feat => string.Join(",",feat["features"].Values<string>()))
group f by f into grp
orderby grp.Count() descending
select new { indFeature = grp.Key, count = grp.Count() };
Produces the following output
sunroof,mag wheels, 2
sunroof, 1
mag wheels, 1
sunroof,mag wheels,spoiler, 1
sunroof,spoiler, 1
spoiler, 1
You could use a HashSet to identify the distinct sets of features, and group on those sets. That way, your Linq looks basically identical to what you have now, but you need an additional IEqualityComparer class in the GroupBy to help compare one set of features to another to check if they're the same.
For example:
var featureSets = autoFeatures
.Select(feature => new HashSet<string>(feature["features"].Values<string>()))
.GroupBy(a => a, new HashSetComparer<string>())
.Select(a => new { Set = a.Key, Count = a.Count() })
.OrderByDescending(a => a.Count);
foreach (var result in featureSets)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{String.Join(",", result.Set)}: {result.Count}");
}
And the comparer class leverages the SetEquals method of the HashSet class to check if one set is the same as another (and this handles the strings being in a different order within the set, etc.)
public class HashSetComparer<T> : IEqualityComparer<HashSet<T>>
{
public bool Equals(HashSet<T> x, HashSet<T> y)
{
// so if x and y both contain "sunroof" only, this is true
// even if x and y are a different instance
return x.SetEquals(y);
}
public int GetHashCode(HashSet<T> obj)
{
// force comparison every time by always returning the same,
// or we could do something smarter like hash the contents
return 0;
}
}
I have the following query:
var results = from theData in GeometricAverage
group theData by new { study = theData.study, groupNumber = theData.groupNumber, GeoAverage= theData.GeoAverage } into grp
select new
{
study = grp.Key.study,
groupNumber = grp.Key.groupNumber,
TGI = testFunction(grp.Key.GeoAverage, Also here I want to pass in the GeoAverage for only group 1 (but for each individual study))
};
What I want to do is that for each study, there are multiple groups with a GeoAverage figure for each group. The TGI is calculated by passing the GeoAverage figure for each group and the GeoAverage figure for group 1 (on each study) into the testFunction. I can't figure out how to pass in the value just for group 1.
Hope this makes sense.
EDIT: Sample of data:
Study Group GeoAverage
1 1 3
1 2 5
1 3 6
2 1 2
2 2 3
2 3 9
So, for the above data, I would want each GeoAverage figure for each group, to be evaluated against the GeoAverage figure of group 1 within that same study. So if I have say a function:
int foo(int a, int b)
{
return a * b;
}
Using the data above, I would first evaluate study 1, group 1 against itself, so pass in GeoAverage 3 twice and return 9. For Study 1, group 2, pass in group 2 GA at 5, and that studys group1 GA at 3, returning 15.
Have now worked it out. I iterate through a collection of data that I want the value to be stored against and use the following two LINQ queries:
foreach (var data in compoundData)
{
var controlValue = from d in GeometricAverage
where d.study == data.study
where d.groupNumber == "1"
select d.GeoAverage;
var treatmentValue = from l in GeometricAverage
where l.study == data.study
where l.groupNumber == data.groupNumber
select l.GeoAverage;
data.TGI = CalculateTGI(controlValue, treatmentValue);
}
I am having a terrible time finding a solution to what I am sure is a simple problem.
I started an app with data in Lists of objects. It's pertinent objects used to look like this (very simplified):
class A {
int[] Nums;
}
and
List<A> myListOfA;
I wanted to count occurrences of values in the member array over all the List.
I found this solution somehow:
var results
from a in myListOfA
from n in a.Nums
group n by n into g
orderby g.Key
select new{ number = g.Key, Occurences = g.Count}
int NumberOfValues = results.Count();
That worked well and I was able to generate the histogram I wanted from the query.
Now I have converted to using an SQL database. The table I am using now looks like this:
MyTable {
int Value1;
int Value2;
int Value3;
int Value4;
int Value5;
int Value6;
}
I have a DataContext that maps to the DB.
I cannot figure out how to translate the previous LINQ statement to work with this. I have tried this:
MyDataContext myContext;
var results =
from d in myContext.MyTable
from n in new{ d.Value1, d.Value2, d.Value3, d.Value4, d.Value5, d.Value6 }
group n by n into g
orderby g.Key
select new { number = g.Key, Occurences = g.Count() };
I have tried some variations on the constructed array like adding .AsQueryable() at the end - something I saw somewhere else. I have tried using group to create the array of values but nothing works. I am a relative newbie when it come to database languages. I just cannot find any clue anywhere on the web. Maybe I am not asking the right question. Any help is appreciated.
I received help on a microsoft site. The problem is mixing LINQ to SQL with LINQ to Objects.
This is how the query should be stated:
var results =
from d in MyContext.MyTable.AsEnumerable()
from n in new[]{d.Value1, d.Value2, d.Value3, d.Value4, d.Value5, d.Value6}
group n by n into g
orderby g.Key
select new {number = g.Key, Occureneces = g.Count()};
Works like a charm.
If you wish to use LINQ to SQL, you could try this "hack" that I recently discovered. It isn't the prettiest most cleanest code, but at least you won't have to revert to using LINQ to Objects.
var query =
from d in MyContext.MyTable
let v1 = MyContext.MyTable.Where(dd => dd.ID == d.ID).Select(dd => dd.Value1)
let v2 = MyContext.MyTable.Where(dd => dd.ID == d.ID).Select(dd => dd.Value2)
// ...
let v6 = MyContext.MyTable.Where(dd => dd.ID == d.ID).Select(dd => dd.Value6)
from n in v1.Concat(v2).Concat(v3).Concat(v4).Concat(v5).Concat(v6)
group 1 by n into g
orderby g.Key
select new
{
number = g.Key,
Occureneces = g.Count(),
};
How about creating your int array on the fly?
var results =
from d in myContext.MyTable
from n in new int[] { d.Value1, d.Value2, d.Value3, d.Value4, d.Value5, d.Value6 }
group n by n into g
orderby g.Key
select new { number = g.Key, Occurences = g.Count() };
In a relational database, such as SQL Server, collections are represented as tables. So you should actually have two tables - Samples and Values. The Keys table would represent a single "A" object, while the Values table would represent each element in A.Nums, with a foreign key pointing to the one of the records in the Samples table. LINQ to SQL
's O/R mapper will then create a "Values" property for each Sample object, which contains a queryable collection of the attached Values. You would then use the following query:
var results =
from sample in myContext.Samples
from value in sample.Values
group value by value into values
orderby values.Key
select new { Value = values.Key, Frequency = values.Count() };
I'm having a hard time understanding how I can form a LINQ query to do the following:
I have a table CallLogs and I want to get back a single result which represents the call that has the longest duration.
The row looks like this:
[ID] [RemoteParty] [Duration]
There can be multiple rows for the same RemoteParty, each which represents a call of a particular duration. I'm wanting to know which RemoteParty has the longest total duration.
Using LINQ, I got this far:
var callStats = (from c in database.CallLogs
group c by c.RemoteParty into d
select new
{
RemoteParty = d.Key,
TotalDuration = d.Sum(x => x.Duration)
});
So now I have a grouped result with the total duration for each RemoteParty but I need the maximum single result.
[DistinctRemoteParty1] [Duration]
[DistinctRemoteParty2] [Duration]
[DistinctRemotePartyN] [Duration]
How can I modify the query to achieve this?
Order the result and return the first one.
var callStats = (from c in database.CallLogs
group c by c.RemoteParty into d
select new
{
RemoteParty = d.Key,
TotalDuration = d.Sum(x => x.Duration)
});
callStats = callStats.OrderByDescending( a => a.TotalDuration )
.FirstOrDefault();
Have a look at the "Max" extension method from linq
callStats.Max(g=>g.TotalDuration);