We Keep Coding

Inject AddSqlServer with another service

Is it possible to resolve an instance of ISettingsService from the ConfigureServices method in Startup(.cs) - webapplication?
I've implemented a SettingsService which is able to retrieve the database connectionstring from an external source (secure credentials store). Within the ConfigureServices I need an instance of the ISettingsService in order to get the connectionstring and pass it to the services.AddSqlServer<MyDbContext>(connectionstring) method.
While creating the instance (using var provider = services.BuildServiceProvider(); var settings = provider.GetService<ISettingsProvider>();) Visual Studio displays the next error:
Another developer posted a similar question on StackOverflow and the answer provides a solution in case of AddSingleton/ AddTransient. What is the correct way to apply it on the AddSqlServer call? Or could you provide another solution to avoid the warning/ error message?

The Intellisense comment for .AddSqlServer actually says to use .AddDbContext if you need more control, and that's certainly the correct option.
If you refer to the source code here, you can see that all .AddSqlServer is actually doing is calling .AddDbContext and configuring the options accordingly. We can therefore write our own solution like this:
services.AddDbContext<DbContext>((serviceProvider, options) => {
var settings = serviceProvider.GetService<ISettingsProvider>();
// I don't know what methods your ISettingsProvider makes available
// so adjust accordingly
string connectionString = settings.GetSetting("connectionString");
options.UseSqlServer(connectionString);
});
Of course you can make other changes to the options here, and .UseSqlServer can also take a Action<SqlServerDbContextOptionsBuilder> (options.UseSqlServer(connectionString, opts => opts.EnableRetryOnFailure()), etc.) to further configure it.

C# AWS Parameter Store - Configuration not loading SystemManagerConfiguration in .Net 6

Application is not able to talk to AWS Parameter Store in .NET 6.
It is always talking to appsettings.json.
I tried debugging locally, still same behavior. Not able to find the SystemManagerConfiguration under list of configuration .
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder();
var connectionString = builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("OrderTrackerDatabase");
Packages Used
Library Source Code : https://github.com/aws/aws-dotnet-extensions-configuration
image

I got the same issue and finally resolved it.
The samples code in https://github.com/aws/aws-dotnet-extensions-configuration missed one line as below after called "AddSystemsManager" method in .Net 6.
builder.Services.Configure<Settings>(builder.Configuration.GetSection($"common:settings"));
After added above line, then I'm able to get the correct values from AWS Parameter Store when using the settings.
I've also created an issue of this in GitHub as below -
https://github.com/aws/aws-dotnet-extensions-configuration/issues/114

I believe the problem might be the trailing slash after "/OrderTracking/", try "/OrderTracking" instead.

WebApplication.CreateBuilder() will create new instance and doesn't carry over the SystemManager configuration.
Instead, use IConfiguration instance through constructor DI.
var connectionString = _configuration.GetConnectionString("OrderTrackerDatabase");

In my case this extensions method was returning null at my lambda:
private static IConfiguration InitializeConfiguration() => new ConfigurationBuilder()
.AddSystemsManager($"/my-data", true, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5))
.Build();
Because the role of lambda didn't have permission for read SSM for that resource.
User: is not authorized to perform: ssm:GetParametersByPath on resource
So, just add necessary permission (ssm:GetParametersByPath) for the role of lambda to your resource at System Manager.

In my case, I am using lambda serverless, so the IConfig is always null when it is passed to the controller.
I resolved it by changing the IOptions<Settings> settings in the Controller constructor to IConfiguration settings and then access the parameters by name like _settings.GetValue<string>("ParameterName")
A little less "Object Oriented", but it seemed much easier than this complex solution

a proxy type with the name account has been defined by another assembly

We have 2 orgs running in our on-premise crm 2011 system.
We have generated early bound classes for both orgs.
One of our plugins is throwing the "a proxy type with the name account has been defined by another assembly" error when deactivating an account.
That plugin only references one of the early bound dll's.
How do I get the CRM system to respect the namespace of these references.
I've tried the few items that show up from Google and none are working.
Since you can reproduce this with 2 vanilla orgs I would imaging there is something OUTSIDE the code layer we can do without having to go back and refactor a bunch of code for the 2 orgs.
Thanks,
Jon

The problem is actually with WCF attempting to deserialize the server response and not being able to identify the correct type. The best method to sort this issue is to pass in the current assembly using Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly() to the ProxyTypesBehavior() while creating the proxy like so.
using (serviceProxy = new OrganizationServiceProxy(config.OrganizationUri,
config.HomeRealmUri,
config.Credentials,
config.DeviceCredentials))
{
// This statement is required to enable early-bound type support.
serviceProxy.ServiceConfiguration.CurrentServiceEndpoint.Behaviors.Add(new ProxyTypesBehavior(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly()));
}

You may run into this issue when referencing different assemblies containing proxy-classes, i.e. one assembly wrapping the server SDK (Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk) and another assembly wrapping the client SDK (Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk.Client).
In such a scenario it seems to be required to tell the OrganizationServiceProxy which assembly should be used to resolve the proxy classes.
This should help:
var credentials = new ClientCredentials();
credentials.Windows.ClientCredential = new System.Net.NetworkCredential(userName, password, domain);
var proxy = new OrganizationServiceProxy(new Uri(discoveryUrl), null, credentials, null);
proxy.EnableProxyTypes(typeof(CrmServiceContext).Assembly);
var context = CrmServiceContext(proxy);
The important thing is to call EnableProxyTypes by passing the correct assembly. I saw another solution using CrmConnection but CrmConnection is only available in the client SDK, which means that you can't instantiate a "server-OrganizationServiceProxy" this way. EnableProxyTypes(Assembly assembly) works for both sides.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
MH

It maybe years since this question has been raised. However, I faced this problem recently and have been extremely worried about thousands of lines of code to be changed. However, I was lucky to find the following simple change to get myself out of hell:
Suppose there are two context objects you deal with:
an OrganizationServiceContext object: context1
a CrmSvcUtil Context object: context2
and a single OrganizationServiceProxy object: service
if in a single method, you make multiple CRUD operations using the same service object but with either of context objects as exemplified above, it is highly probable that this error be raised. However, by doing the following, you can prevent it to happen.
Every time you want to work with context1, you precede the context object with the service object as following:
service.EnableProxyTypes(typeof(OrganizationServiceContext).Assembly);
using (var context1 = new OrganizationServiceContext(_service)){
// your classic code here
}
Also, every time you want to work with context2, you follow the same structure:
service.EnableProxyTypes(typeof(HiwebContext).Assembly);
using (var context = new XYZContext(this._service)){
// your CrmSvcUtil none-classic code here
}

this normally means that there is one or more assemblies with the same method name or property to fix this use the fully qualified name of the assembly.. for example in the using System.IO for example if you had a method named the same way in your Class code that conflicts with System.IO.... you would write your fix like
thisObject.System.IO.Path( ---- ) = somthing for example.. does this make sense..?

I found that adding the Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly() solved the problem.

adding the Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly() solve my problem, you also need to add using System.Reflection;
thanks

How can I get the URL of the current page from within a C# App_Code class?

I have a logging class that, well, logs things. I would like to add the ability to automatically have the current page be logged with the messages.
Is there a way to get the information I'm looking for?
Thanks,

From your class you can use the HttpContext.Current property (in System.Web.dll). From there, you can create a chain of properties:
Request
Url and RawUrl
The underlying object is a Page object, so if you cast it to that, then use any object you would normally use from within a Page object, such as the Request property.

It's brittle and hard to test but you can use System.Web.HttpContext.Current which will give you a Request property which in turn has the RawUrl property.

public static class MyClass
{
public static string GetURL()
{
HttpRequest request = HttpContext.Current.Request;
string url = request.Url.ToString();
return url;
}
}
I tried to break it down a little :)

In the past I've also rolled my own logging classes and used Console.Writeln() but really there are a number of good logging options that already exist so why go there? I use NLog pretty much everywhere; it is extremely flexible with various log output destinations including console and file, lots of log format options, and is trivial to set up with versions targeting the various .net frameworks including compact. Running the installer will add NLog config file options to the Visual Studio Add New Item dialog. Using in your code is simple:
// declare in your class
private static Logger logger = LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger();
...
// use in your code
logger.Debug(() => string.Format("Url: {0}", HttpContext.Current.Request.Url));

Custom MembershipProvider Initialize method

When overriding the MembershipProvider and calling it directly, is there a way to fill the NameValueCollection config parameter of the Initialize method without manually looking through the config file for the settings?
Obviously this Initialize is being called by asp.net and the config is being filled somewhere. I have implemented my own MembershipProvider and it works fine through the build in controls.
I would like to create a new instance of my provider and make a call to it directly, but I don't really want to parse the .config for the MembershipProvider, it's connection string name and then the connection string if it's already being done somewhere.

tvanfosson- Thanks for the help. (if I had the 15 points necessary I would vote you up)
From your link I was able to figure it out. It turns out the second parameter to the Initialize proceedure was the list of parameters from the provider and could be reached in the following way:
string configPath = "~/web.config";
Configuration config = WebConfigurationManager.OpenWebConfiguration(configPath);
MembershipSection section = (MembershipSection)config.GetSection("system.web/membership");
ProviderSettingsCollection settings = section.Providers;
NameValueCollection membershipParams = settings[section.DefaultProvider].Parameters;
Initialize(section.DefaultProvider, membershipParams);

Not sure why you want to create a new one, but if you create it yourself, you'll need to read the web config and get the values yourself to pass to Initialize() as this is done outside the class. I'm sure, though, that there is already a section handler for this section so it should be just a matter of doing:
MembershipSection section = WebConfigurationManager.GetSection("membership");
Then find your provider and accessing its properties to construct the NameValueCollection. I don't think you will have to write any code to parse the configuration section.
Here is the MembershipSection documentation at MSDN. Drill down from there.

In any case you shouldn't create instance of MembershipProvider. It is creating and initializating by standard asp.net infrastructure. You can access to it by code like this one:
var customerMembership = Membership.Provider;