We Keep Coding

How to call a method of the ServiceHost from the hosting process in WCF C#

I have a publisher / subscriber pattern WCF Duplex ServiceHost that is hosted by a Windows Service. The Windows Service receives events from a separate process. OnEvent I would like to force my WCF Host to publish that data to all subscribed clients. Typically if a Client is calling this is straight forward. But when my Service Host needs to do this - I can't get my head around HOW to do that.
I have 2 questions:
1: I do not know how to create a Channel in WCFHost from my Windows Service so that it can use to publish to the Subscribers.
2: I read Creating WCF ChannelFactory so I do know I am creating a DuplexChannelFactory (2 per second ) which might be too much overhead.
Any help examples, hints are greatly appreciated. I am not a WCF expert and currently know more about it than I thought I should have to know in order to use it.
I had read on SO
Can I call a Method in a self hosted wcf host locally?
So then I have created a method inside my WCFHost like so:
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode = InstanceContextMode.PerSession,
AutomaticSessionShutdown = false,
IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults = true)]
[CallbackBehavior(UseSynchronizationContext = false, ConcurrencyMode = ConcurrencyMode.Multiple)]
public class ServerHost<TService> : ServiceHost where TService : class
{
public T GetDuplexClientChannel<T, Cback>(BindingType bindingType, EndpointAddress endPointAddress) where T : class
{
ServiceEndpoint sep = GetContractServiceEndPoint<T>(bindingType, endPointAddress);
lock (_syncRoot)
{
DuplexChannelFactory<T> factory = new DuplexChannelFactory<T>(typeof(Cback), sep);
return factory.CreateChannel(endPointAddress);
}
}
}
I get an error of course that there is no InstanceContext because I am constructing using typeof(Cback) ..
"This CreateChannel overload cannot be called on this instance of DuplexChannelFactory, as the DuplexChannelFactory was initialized with a Type and no valid InstanceContext was provided."
So I am not sure how I can go about performing this ?
And for those that say read the error : yes I read the error.
Now how to do that with an InstanceContext that does not exist as OperationContext.Current does not exist at this point as I am calling this method form my Hosting Process into my WCFHost.
So if I could have a nice example of how to do this - even if I must use the code example on the 2nd link (of course implementing the DuplexChannelFactory) I would greatly appreciate it.
EDIT
Basically the windows Service is doing some heavy work monitoring other services, about 2 times a second it then must publish that to "Subscribed" Clients via WCF.

I think you have got very confused about how everything is wired together and are mixing concepts from the client in with the service. You haven't provided much concrete information about your scenario to go on so I'm going to provide a small example and hopefully you will be able to apply the ideas to your problem.
[ServiceContract(CallbackContract=typeof(IMyServiceCallback))]
public interface IMyService
{
[OperationContract]
void Register();
}
public interface IMyServiceCallback
{
[OperationContract]
void ReceiveData(string data);
}
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode=InstanceContextMode.Single, ConcurrencyMode = ConcurrencyMode.Multiple)]
public class MyService : IMyService
{
static HashSet<IMyServiceCallback> s_allClients = new HashSet<IMyServiceCallback>();
static object s_lockobj = new object();
public void Register()
{
lock(s_lockobj)
{
_allClients.Add(OperationContext.Current.GetCallbackChannel<IMyServiceCallback>());
}
}
public static void SendDataToClients(string data)
{
HashSet<IMyServiceCallback> tempSet;
lock(s_lockobj)
{
tempSet = new HashSet<IMyServiceCallback>(_allClients);
}
foreach(IMyServiceCallback cb in tempSet)
{
try
{
cb.ReceiveData(data);
}
catch(Exception)
{
lock(s_lockobj)
{
_allClients.Remove(cb);
cb.Abort();
cb.Dispose();
}
}
}
}
}
In your OnEvent method, you would call something similar to this inside your event method.
MyService.SendDataToClients(mydata);
This uses static data to store the list of clients. If you wanted to do something like segment your clients for different endpoints, you would need to do something different. There is a potential out of order message and scaling problem with this code if your OnEvent method can be called again while the previous call hasn't completed. For example, if you receive 2 messages, the first being large and the second being small, you could potentially send the second smaller message to clients later in the HashSet iteration order before they have been sent the first message. Also this won't scaled to a large number of clients as you could block timing out on one client holding up messages being sent to other clients. You could use something similar to Task's to dispatch multiple message deliveries. If this needs to scale, I would suggest looking at Reactive Extensions for .Net

Writing a generic WCF service client config/endpoint checker?

I have a client application that consumes a number of services. It's not always immediately obvious when a service is down or incorrectly configured. I own the service side code and hosting for most of the services, but not all of them. It's a real mixed bag of client proxies - different bindings (basichttp/wshttp/nettcp), some have been generated using svcutil.exe, while others are made programatically with ChannelFactory where the contract is in a common assembly. However, I always have access to the address, binding and contract.
I would like to have a single component in my client application that could perform a basic check of the binding/endpoint config and the service availability (to show in some diagnostic panel in the client). As a minimum I just want to know that there is an endpoint at the configured address, even better would be to find out if the endpoint is responsive and supports the binding the client is trying to use.
I tried googling and was surprised that I didn't find an example (already a bad sign perhaps) but I figured that it couldn't be that hard, all I had to do was to create a clientchannel and try to open() and close() catch any exceptions that occur and abort() if necessary.
I was wrong - in particular, with clients using BasicHttpBinding where I can specify any endpoint address and am able to open and close without any exceptions.
Here's a trimmed down version of my implementation, in reality I'm returning slightly more detailed info about the type of exception and the endpoint address but this is the basic structure.
public class GenericClientStatusChecker<TChannel> : ICanCheckServiceStatus where TChannel : class
{
public GenericClientStatusChecker(Binding binding, EndpointAddress endpoint)
{
_endpoint = endpoint;
_binding = binding;
}
public bool CheckServiceStatus()
{
bool isOk = false;
ChannelFactory<TChannel> clientChannelFactory = null;
IClientChannel clientChannel = null;
try
{
clientChannelFactory = new ChannelFactory<TChannel>(_binding, _endpoint);
}
catch
{
return isOk;
}
try
{
clientChannel = clientChannelFactory.CreateChannel() as IClientChannel;
clientChannel.Open();
clientChannel.Close();
isOk = true;
}
catch
{
if (clientChannel != null)
clientChannel.Abort();
}
return isOk;
}
}
[Test]
public void CheckServiceAtNonexistentEndpoint_ExpectFalse()
{
var checker = new GenericClientStatusChecker<IDateTimeService>(new BasicHttpBinding(), new Endpointaddress("http://nonexistenturl"));
// This assert fails, because according to my implementation, everything's ok
Assert.IsFalse(checker.CheckServiceStatus());
}
I also tried a similar technique with a dummy testclient class that implemented ClientBase with the same result. I suppose it might be possible if I knew that all my service contracts implemented a common CheckHealth() method, but because some of the services are outside my control, I can't even do that.
So, is it even possible to write such a simple general purpose generic service checker as this? And if so how? (And if not, why not?)
Thanks!

Have you looked at WCF Discovery?
WCF Discovery allows a client to search for a service based on
different criteria including contract types, binding elements,
namespace, scope, and keywords or version numbers. WCF Discovery
enables runtime and design time discovery. Adding discovery to your
application can be used to enable other scenarios such as fault
tolerance and auto configuration.
For a first attempt, you could query the endpoint to see if it supports the expected contract.
The big benefit is that you can have the client “discover” which service it wants to talk to at runtime. Which removes a lot of the client side configuration errors that you are likely used to seeing.

You need to check out SO-AWARE. It is a web service management tool that can manage SOAP or REST WCF-based service across your organization. Further it has a Test Workbench!
Here are a couple of videos that show it off too:
Part 1
Part 2
To put it in perspective, this is so complex that these people make a living doing it, I don't think it's something you want to realistically build on your own.

WCF Channel and ChannelFactory Caching

So I've decided to up the performance a bit in my WCF application, and attempt to cache Channels and the ChannelFactory. There's two questions I have about all of this that I need to clear up before I get started.
1) Should the ChannelFactory be implemented as a singleton?
2) I'm kind of unsure about how to cache/reuse individual channels. Do you have any examples of how to do this you can share?
It's probably important to note that my WCF service is being deployed as a stand alone application, with only one endpoint.
EDIT:
Thank you for the responses. I still have a few questions though...
1)I guess I'm confused as to where the caching should occur. I'm delivering a client API that uses this code to another department in our company. Does this caching occur on the client?
2)The client API will be used as part of a Silverlight application, does this change anything? In particular, what caching mechanisms are available in such a scenario?
3)I'm still not clear about the design of the GetChannelFactory method. If I have only one service, should only one ChannelFactory ever be created and cached?
I still haven't implemented any caching feature (because I'm utterly confused about how it should be done!), but here's what I have for the client proxy so far:
namespace MyCompany.MyProject.Proxies
{
static readonly ChannelFactory<IMyService> channelFactory =
new ChannelFactory<IMyService>("IMyService");
public Response DoSomething(Request request)
{
var channel = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
try
{
Response response = channel.DoSomethingWithService(request);
((ICommunicationObject)channel).Close();
return response;
}
catch(Exception exception)
{
((ICommenicationObject)channel).Abort();
}
}
}

Use the ChannelFactory to create an instance of the factory, then cache that instance. You can then create communicatino channels as needed/desired from the cached istance.
Do you have a need for multiple channel factories (i.e.., are there multiple services)? In my experience, that's where you'll see the biggest benefit in performance. Creating a channel is a fairly inexpensive task; it's setting everything up at the start that takes time.
I would not cache individual channels - I'd create them, use them for an operation, and then close them. If you cache them, they may time out and the channel will fault, then you'll have to abort it and create a new one anyway.
Not sure why you'd want to usea singleton to implement ChannelFactory, especially if you're going to create it and cache it, and there's only one endpoint.
I'll post some example code later when I have a bit more time.
UPDATE: Code Examples
Here is an example of how I implemented this for a project at work. I used ChannelFactory<T>, as the application I was developing is an n-tier app with several services, and more will be added. The goal was to have a simple way to create a client once per life of the application, and then create communication channels as needed. The basics of the idea are not mine (I got it from an article on the web), though I modified the implementation for my needs.
I have a static helper class in my application, and within that class I have a dictionary and a method to create communication channels from the channelf factory.
The dictionary is as follows (object is the value as it will contain different channel factories, one for each service). I put "Cache" in the example as sort of a placeholder - replace the syntax with whatever caching mechanism you're using.
public static Dictionary<string, object> OpenChannels
{
get
{
if (Cache["OpenChannels"] == null)
{
Cache["OpenChannels"] = new Dictionary<string, object>();
}
return (Dictionary<string, object>)Cache["OpenChannels"];
}
set
{
Cache["OpenChannels"] = value;
}
}
Next is a method to create a communication channel from the factory instance. The method checks to see if the factory exists first - if it does not, it creates it, puts it in the dictionary and then generates the channel. Otherwise it simply generates a channel from the cached instance of the factory.
public static T GetFactoryChannel<T>(string address)
{
string key = typeof(T.Name);
if (!OpenChannels.ContainsKey(key))
{
ChannelFactory<T> factory = new ChannelFactory<T>();
factory.Endpoint.Address = new EndpointAddress(new System.Uri(address));
factory.Endpoint.Binding = new BasicHttpBinding();
OpenChannels.Add(key, factory);
}
T channel = ((ChannelFactory<T>)OpenChannels[key]).CreateChannel();
((IClientChannel)channel).Open();
return channel;
}
I've stripped this example down some from what I use at work. There's a lot you can do in this method - you can handle multiple bindings, assign credentials for authentication, etc. Its pretty much your one stop shopping center for generating a client.
Finally, when I use it in the application, I generally create a channel, do my business, and close it (or abort it if need be). For example:
IMyServiceContract client;
try
{
client = Helper.GetFactoryChannel<IMyServiceContract>("http://myserviceaddress");
client.DoSomething();
// This is another helper method that will safely close the channel,
// handling any exceptions that may occurr trying to close.
// Shouldn't be any, but it doesn't hurt.
Helper.CloseChannel(client);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Something went wrong; need to abort the channel
// I also do logging of some sort here
Helper.AbortChannel(client);
}
Hopefully the above examples will give you something to go on. I've been using something similar to this for about a year now in a production environment and it's worked very well. 99% of any problems we've encountered have usually been related to something outside the application (either external clients or data sources not under our direct control).
Let me know if anything isn't clear or you have further questions.

You could always just make your ChannelFactory static for each WCF Contract...
You should be aware that from .Net 3.5 the proxy objects are pooled for performance reasons by the channel factory. Calling the ICommunicationObject.Close() method actually returns the object to the pool in the hope it can be reused.
I would look at the profiler if you want to do some optimisation, if you can prevent just one IO call being made in your code it could far outweigh any optimisation you will make with the channel factory. Don't pick an area to optimise, use the profiler to find where you can target an optimisation. If you have an SQL database for instance, you will probably find some low hanging fruit in your queries that will get you orders of magnitude performance increases if these haven't already been optimised.

Creating the Channel costs the performance so much. actually , WCF already has the cache mechanism for the ChannelFactory if you use the ClientBase in the client instead of the pure ChannelFactory. But the cache will be expired if you make some anditional operations(Please google it for details if you want).
For the ErOx's issue i got another solution i think it is better. see below:
namespace ChannelFactoryCacheDemo
{
public static class ChannelFactoryInitiator
{
private static Hashtable channelFactories = new Hashtable();
public static ChannelFactory Initiate(string endpointName)
{
ChannelFactory channelFactory = null;
if (channelFactories.ContainsKey(endpointName))//already cached, get from the table
{
channelFactory = channelFactories[endpointName] as ChannelFactory;
}
else // not cached, create and cache then
{
channelFactory = new ChannelFactory(endpointName);
lock (channelFactories.SyncRoot)
{
channelFactories[endpointName] = channelFactory;
}
}
return channelFactory;
}
}
class AppWhereUseTheChannel
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
ChannelFactory channelFactory = ChannelFactoryInitiator.Initiate("MyEndpoint");
}
}
interface IMyContract { }
}
you can customize the logic and the parameters of the Initiate method yourself if you got another requirement. but this initiator class is not limited only one endpoint. it is powerful for all of the endpoint in your application. hopefully. it works well for you. BTW. this solution is not from me. i got this from a book.

Using multiple wcf services, factory class to return proxyclient

I have multiple services in my application. WebService1, WebService2,WebService3 and so on..
All the services have same methods, but they are hosted on different IPs.
Now when a client calls a methodA(1) then
WebService1Client.Method() should be called;
client calls a methodA(2) then WebService2Client.Method() should be called.
I do not want to do a switch case for each and every function on the client.
I would rather prefer to create some class/methods which would return the appropriate proxyClient.
How can I create a class to return the object and further how to use that object.
Please point me to some sample codes or references.
Thanks

If all your services implement the same contract (I mean exactly the same, not a contract with the same methods), you can simply create proxies using the ChannelFactory class and cast the returned object into the contract interface.
This should give you the expected generic behavior.
One way to ensure the same interface is used all over is to put it into a separate class library and share it between all projects. Make sure you configure your service references to reuse types in referenced assemblies.
EDIT: This is how you would use the ChannelFactory, you can get rid of the service reference:
BasicHttpBinding myBinding = new BasicHttpBinding();
EndpointAddress myEndpoint = new EndpointAddress("http://localhost/MathService/Ep1");
ChannelFactory<IMath> myChannelFactory = new ChannelFactory<IMath>(myBinding, myEndpoint);

I am not quite sure why you want to wrap the creation of the proxies into a factory. The easiest usage pattern is to new the proxy where you need it and each time when you need. When you are not running reliable sessions or something other heavy stuff it does not have much overhead to new a proxy instance. On the other hand it makes sure that you have a connection that is working and that the channel is not in a faulted state.
When using the proxy you should make sure to close it when done and abort it when it throws an exception.
var proxy = new Proxy();
try { proxy.SomeMethod(); }
catch { proxy.Abort(); }
finally { proxy.Close(); }

WCF service returning another service (service factory?)

We are using WCF for communication between a client and a server application. The client application has many features that requires communication to the server - and we have chosen to implement this in multiple classes (seperation of responsability)
For the time, we are creating new WCF endpoints and service contracts for each object - Invoicing, Accounting, Content Management, etc. This causes a lot of endpoint configuration both on the client and server (with potential misconfiguration problems when moving into the test and production platforms).
I would like to know if I can define a single WCF endpoint that can deliver multiple service contact implementations. Our configuration files would then contain a single endpoint (to the service factory) and I can request different services by specifying the interface of the service I am interested in.
e.g.
using (IServiceClientFactory serviceClientFactory = new RealProxyServiceClientFactory())
{
// This is normal WCF proxy object creation.
IServiceFactory serviceFactory = serviceClientFactory.CreateInstance<IServiceFactory>("");
// This is what we would like to do
IInvoiceService invoiceService = serviceFactory.getService(typeof(IInvoiceService));
invoiceService.executeOperation(data);
}
The clue being a single endpoint configuration per client/server pair, instead of an endpoint configuration per service contact I would like to make available.
Is this possible?

I'm not 100% clear on what you're trying to do, but if you just want to be able to host different contracts on the same address with the implementation inside one service class, this is completely possible. To share an endpoint address, you must ensure that you use the same binding instance for each service endpoint.
Here is a complete sample which defines 3 contracts, 1 service class which implements all of them, and a ServiceHost with the 3 contract endpoints at the exact same address:
using System;
using System.ServiceModel;
[ServiceContract]
interface IContractA
{
[OperationContract]
void A();
}
[ServiceContract]
interface IContractB
{
[OperationContract]
void B();
}
[ServiceContract]
interface IContractC
{
[OperationContract]
void C();
}
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode = InstanceContextMode.Single)]
class Service : IContractA, IContractB, IContractC
{
public Service()
{
}
public void A()
{
Console.WriteLine("A");
}
public void B()
{
Console.WriteLine("B");
}
public void C()
{
Console.WriteLine("C");
}
}
class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Uri address = new Uri("net.pipe://localhost/Service/");
ServiceHost host = new ServiceHost(new Service(), address);
NetNamedPipeBinding binding = new NetNamedPipeBinding();
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IContractA), binding, string.Empty);
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IContractB), binding, string.Empty);
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IContractC), binding, string.Empty);
host.Open();
IContractA proxyA = ChannelFactory<IContractA>.CreateChannel(new NetNamedPipeBinding(), new EndpointAddress(address));
proxyA.A();
((IClientChannel)proxyA).Close();
IContractB proxyB = ChannelFactory<IContractB>.CreateChannel(new NetNamedPipeBinding(), new EndpointAddress(address));
proxyB.B();
((IClientChannel)proxyB).Close();
IContractC proxyC = ChannelFactory<IContractC>.CreateChannel(new NetNamedPipeBinding(), new EndpointAddress(address));
proxyC.C();
((IClientChannel)proxyC).Close();
host.Close();
}
}

I doubt that this would work. Xml serialization might be the biggest problem here.
Also I don't think you actually need it. If I was in your shoes I would try and abstract my communication with the service. Basically you would always send a "Message" to the service, which has a "Target" being one of the classes you wanted to access. The service would always reply with a "Response", of which the contents would be filled by the class the "Message" was send to.
Another approach would be to route all these messages trough a service that would echo the request to the appropriate service. This way you keep scalability up, but it does still have a large configuration burden.
HTH.

Sounds like you want to keep your seperate services but have some kind of bus that routes is throught. MSMQ maybe, then you can have one services that takes every message pops it onto a specific queue and then a dedicated service can read that off that particular queue.
Not really a WCF based solution though admittedly.
The notion of a single interface(read as ServiceContract) implemented by multiple classes wont work. So you'd need one 'monster' service that implements all and routes through to the correct service. Facade pattern springs to mind.